pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.00474 · v1 · submitted 2025-04-01 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn

High specific impulse electrospray propulsion with small capillary emitters

Manel Caballero-P\'erez , Marc Galobardes-Esteban , Manuel Gamero-Casta\~no This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 22:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn
keywords electrospray propulsionionic liquidsTaylor conespecific impulsecapillary emitterscone-jet modefluid dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Smaller capillary emitters enable steady cone-jet electrospray at lower flow rates, reaching specific impulses up to 3000 s.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that capillary emitters with tip diameters of 15 to 50 micrometers produce smaller and more stable Taylor cones when using ionic liquid propellants. The added stability allows steady cone-jet operation at flow rates much lower than those possible with larger emitters, which was not expected from standard theory. With 10 kV acceleration this produces specific impulses up to 3000 seconds and efficiencies above 50 percent, roughly doubling earlier results. For some liquids and the smallest emitters the emitted beam consists only of ions at the lowest flows. At these low rates a significant fraction of the supplied propellant escapes acceleration, which renders time-of-flight measurements of specific impulse unreliable.

Core claim

Reducing emitter tip diameter from 50 to 15 micrometers yields smaller, more stable Taylor cones that permit steady cone-jet electrospray at flow rates well below the values set by propellant properties alone. At 10 kV this produces specific impulses up to 3000 s with efficiencies above 50 percent, approximately twice the performance obtained with larger emitters. For one ionic liquid and the smallest tips the beam is purely ionic at the lowest flows, yet propellant losses appear that make time-of-flight data unreliable.

What carries the argument

Stabilization of the Taylor cone by reduced capillary diameter, which lowers the minimum flow rate required for steady cone-jet operation.

If this is right

  • Specific impulses up to 3000 s become reachable with efficiencies above 50 percent.
  • The I_sp roughly doubles compared with larger capillary emitters.
  • Purely ionic beams appear at the lowest flow rates for some liquids and smallest emitters.
  • Propellant losses at low flow rates make time-of-flight I_sp measurements unreliable.
  • Steady cone-jet operation occurs at flow rates below the value expected from propellant properties alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Thruster designs could exploit the size effect to improve efficiency without changing propellant.
  • The geometry dependence may extend to other electrohydrodynamic emitters beyond capillaries.
  • Direct thrust measurements would be needed to confirm performance when time-of-flight data fail.
  • Testing a wider range of ionic liquids could map how strongly the size effect depends on liquid properties.

Load-bearing premise

The minimum flow rate for steady cone-jet operation depends only on propellant properties when the jet is much smaller than far-field geometry.

What would settle it

Finding that the minimum flow rate for steady cone-jet mode remains unchanged when emitter diameter is reduced from 50 to 15 micrometers would falsify the reported size dependence.

read the original abstract

This study demonstrates the feasibility of using smaller capillary emitters to achieve higher specific impulse ($I_\text{sp}$) in electrospray propulsion. Four ionic liquids were characterized using capillary emitters with tip diameters from 15 to 50 $\mu$m. Smaller diameter capillaries produced smaller and more stable Taylor cones. This stabilization enabled steady cone-jet operation at significantly lower flow rates compared to larger emitters. This was unexpected because when the jet diameter is much smaller than far-field geometric features, the minimum flow rate is thought to be solely determined by the physical properties of the propellant. Using the smaller emitters and acceleration voltages of 10 kV, specific impulses up to 3000 s could be achieved with efficiencies above 50%, approximately doubling the $I_\text{sp}$ observed with larger emitters. For one of the liquids and the smallest emitters, the beam consisted solely of ions at the lowest flow rates, similarly to studies using externally wetted and porous emitters. Another important finding was that at sufficiently low flow rates, a significant fraction of the propellant fed to the emitter is not accelerated by the electrostatic field. These propellant losses make the time-of-flight technique unreliable for determining the $I_\text{sp}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript experimentally characterizes electrospray emitters with capillary tip diameters of 15–50 μm using four ionic liquids. It reports that smaller emitters produce smaller, more stable Taylor cones, enabling steady cone-jet mode at lower flow rates than expected from propellant properties alone. Using 10 kV acceleration, this yields specific impulses up to 3000 s with efficiencies above 50% (roughly double prior larger-emitter results), and ion-only beams for one liquid at the lowest flows. A key additional finding is that at sufficiently low flow rates a significant fraction of fed propellant is not electrostatically accelerated, rendering time-of-flight (ToF) measurements unreliable for I_sp.

Significance. The qualitative demonstration of stable low-flow cone-jet operation with small capillaries is of clear relevance to electrospray propulsion, as it suggests a route to higher I_sp without changing propellant. The ion-only beam observation aligns with prior externally wetted/porous emitter results. However, the quantitative performance claims (I_sp doubling, >50% efficiency) rest on ToF data in the exact regime the paper identifies as unreliable, limiting the strength of the central result.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported I_sp values up to 3000 s and efficiencies above 50% are explicitly tied to the lowest flow rates with the smallest emitters, yet the same paragraph states that 'at sufficiently low flow rates, a significant fraction of the propellant fed to the emitter is not accelerated' and therefore 'time-of-flight technique [is] unreliable for determining the I_sp.' No alternative thrust or mass-loss measurement is described, so the quantitative doubling claim lacks a secure experimental foundation.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The result is presented as unexpected because 'when the jet diameter is much smaller than far-field geometric features, the minimum flow rate is thought to be solely determined by the physical properties of the propellant.' The manuscript does not include a calculation or table comparing the observed minimum flow rates against the expected scaling from propellant properties (e.g., viscosity, surface tension, conductivity), leaving the magnitude of the deviation unquantified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the thorough and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and agree that revisions are needed to resolve inconsistencies and strengthen the quantitative support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reported I_sp values up to 3000 s and efficiencies above 50% are explicitly tied to the lowest flow rates with the smallest emitters, yet the same paragraph states that 'at sufficiently low flow rates, a significant fraction of the propellant fed to the emitter is not accelerated' and therefore 'time-of-flight technique [is] unreliable for determining the I_sp.' No alternative thrust or mass-loss measurement is described, so the quantitative doubling claim lacks a secure experimental foundation.

    Authors: We acknowledge the tension highlighted in the abstract. The high I_sp and efficiency values are indeed reported from the lowest-flow regime where propellant losses become significant and ToF reliability decreases. While our efficiency calculations attempted to account for observed losses via beam current and mass flow comparisons, we agree that without an independent thrust or mass-loss measurement the quantitative claims rest on a less secure foundation than presented. In the revised manuscript we will qualify the abstract to state that the reported I_sp and efficiency figures are subject to the noted uncertainties at the lowest flows, provide additional detail on loss-fraction estimation, and remove or soften the 'doubling' claim until corroborated by future measurements. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The result is presented as unexpected because 'when the jet diameter is much smaller than far-field geometric features, the minimum flow rate is thought to be solely determined by the physical properties of the propellant.' The manuscript does not include a calculation or table comparing the observed minimum flow rates against the expected scaling from propellant properties (e.g., viscosity, surface tension, conductivity), leaving the magnitude of the deviation unquantified.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would be strengthened by an explicit quantitative comparison. In the revision we will add a calculation of the theoretical minimum flow rates for each ionic liquid using the standard scaling relations that depend on viscosity, surface tension, and conductivity. These predicted values will be tabulated alongside the experimentally observed minimum stable flow rates for the 15–50 μm capillaries, thereby quantifying the deviation from the expected propellant-property-limited scaling. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; purely experimental characterization

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental results on Taylor cone stability, flow rates, and performance metrics for small capillary emitters. No derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are presented that could reduce to inputs by construction. The central observations (smaller emitters enabling lower flow rates and higher I_sp) are empirical findings, with the paper itself explicitly noting that ToF becomes unreliable at the relevant low flow rates due to propellant losses. This is self-contained experimental work with no load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes, or renamings of prior results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work is an experimental feasibility study.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5750 in / 1084 out tokens · 68597 ms · 2026-05-22T22:18:26.453510+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Electrospray as a source of nanoparticles for efficient colloid thrusters,

    Gamero-Castaño, M., and Hruby, V., “Electrospray as a source of nanoparticles for efficient colloid thrusters,”Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 17, No. 5, 2001, pp. 977–987. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5858

    work page doi:10.2514/2.5858 2001

  2. [2]

    Development of a multiplexed electrospray micro-thruster with post-acceleration and beam containment,

    Lenguito, G., and Gomez, A., “Development of a multiplexed electrospray micro-thruster with post-acceleration and beam containment,”Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 114, No. 15, 2013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4822029

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4822029 2013

  3. [3]

    Microfabricated electrospray thruster array with high hydraulic resistance channels,

    Grustán-Gutiérrez, E., and Gamero-Castaño, M., “Microfabricated electrospray thruster array with high hydraulic resistance channels,”JournalofPropulsionandPower ,Vol.33,No.4,2017,pp.984–991. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36268

    work page doi:10.2514/1.b36268 2017

  4. [4]

    Figueroa

    Natisin, M. R., Zamora, H. L., McGehee, W. A., Arnold, N. I., Holley, Z. A., Holmes, M. R., and Eckhardt, D., “Fabrication and characterization of a fully conventionally machined, high-performance porous-media electrospray thruster,”Journal 24 of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Vol. 30, No. 11, 2020, p. 115021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088...

    work page doi:10.1088/1361- 2020

  5. [5]

    Investigating the ions emitted by multiply charged ionic liquids from a porous electrospray ion source,

    Dworski, S., and Ryan, C. N., “Investigating the ions emitted by multiply charged ionic liquids from a porous electrospray ion source,”Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 136, No. 13, 2024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0215888

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0215888 2024

  6. [6]

    High-Impulse, Modular, 3D-Printed CubeSat Electrospray Thrusters Throttleable via Pressure and Voltage Control,

    Kim, H., and Velásquez-García, L. F., “High-Impulse, Modular, 3D-Printed CubeSat Electrospray Thrusters Throttleable via Pressure and Voltage Control,”Advanced Science, 2025, p. 2413706. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202413706

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.202413706 2025

  7. [7]

    Liquid Metal Droplets for Heavy Particle Propulsion

    Krohn Jr., V. E.,Electrostatic Propulsion, 1961. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-395559-3.50010-2, chapter: "Liquid Metal Droplets for Heavy Particle Propulsion", pp. 73–80

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-395559-3.50010-2 1961

  8. [8]

    Glycerol droplets for electrostatic propulsion,

    Krohn Jr, V. E., “Glycerol droplets for electrostatic propulsion,”Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol. 9, 1963. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/5.9781600864865.0435.0440

    work page doi:10.2514/5.9781600864865.0435.0440 1963

  9. [9]

    Research on Colloid Thrusters,

    Martínez-Sánchez, M., Fernández de la Mora, M., Gamero-Castaño, M., and Khayms, V., “Research on Colloid Thrusters,” 26th International Electric Propulsion Conference, 1999

    work page 1999

  10. [10]

    Experimental performance of field emission microthrusters,

    Marcuccio, S., Genovese, A., and Andrenucci, M., “Experimental performance of field emission microthrusters,”Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1998, pp. 774–781. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5340

    work page doi:10.2514/2.5340 1998

  11. [11]

    Informing FEEP thruster design utilizing the flight heritage from 167 thrusters in LEO and GEO,

    Krejci, D., Reissner, A., Schönherr, T., Koch, Q., Hugonnaud, V., Grimaud, L., Vogel, T., and Seifert, B., “Informing FEEP thruster design utilizing the flight heritage from 167 thrusters in LEO and GEO,”AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, 2024, p. 1343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-1343

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2024-1343 2024

  12. [12]

    Full performance mapping of the IFM Nano Thruster, including direct thrust measurements,

    Krejci, D., Hugonnaud, V., Schönherr, T., Little, B., Reissner, A., Seifert, B., Koch, Q., Bosch-Borràs, E., and González del Amo, J., “Full performance mapping of the IFM Nano Thruster, including direct thrust measurements,”Journal of Small Satellites, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2019, pp. 881–893

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Charge emissions from electrosprays in vacuum: Mixtures of formamide with methylammoniumformate,

    Garoz, D., and Fernández de la Mora, J., “Charge emissions from electrosprays in vacuum: Mixtures of formamide with methylammoniumformate,”JournalofAppliedPhysics ,Vol.113,No.6,2013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4790580

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4790580 2013

  14. [14]

    Taylor cones of ionic liquids from capillary tubes as sources of pure ions for electrical propulsion,

    Garoz, D., Bueno, C., Larriba, C., Castro, S., and Fernández de la Mora, J., “Taylor cones of ionic liquids from capillary tubes as sources of pure ions for electrical propulsion,”42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2006, p

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-4639

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2006-4639 2006

  16. [16]

    Taylor cones of ionic liquids from capillary tubes as sources of pure ions: The role of surface tension and electrical conductivity,

    Garoz, D., Bueno, C., Larriba, C., Castro, S., Romero-Sanz, I., Fernández de la Mora, J., Yoshida, Y., and Saito, G., “Taylor cones of ionic liquids from capillary tubes as sources of pure ions: The role of surface tension and electrical conductivity,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 102, No. 6, 2007, p. 064913. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2783769

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2783769 2007

  17. [17]

    Masset, R

    Villegas-Prados, D., Cruz, J., Wijnen, M., Fajardo, P., and Navarro-Cavallé, J., “Emission and performance characterization of ionic liquids for an externally wetted electrospray thruster,”Acta Astronautica, 2024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j. actaastro.2024.03.013. 25

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2024

  18. [18]

    Performancemeasurementandevaluationofanionicliquidelectrospraythruster,

    Huang,C.,Jianling,L.,andMu,L.,“Performancemeasurementandevaluationofanionicliquidelectrospraythruster,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2023, pp. 1–15

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Scalable microfabrication of multi-emitter arrays in silicon for a compact microfluidic electrospray propulsion system,

    Cisquella-Serra, A., Galobardes-Esteban, M., and Gamero-Castaño, M., “Scalable microfabrication of multi-emitter arrays in silicon for a compact microfluidic electrospray propulsion system,”ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Vol. 14, No. 38, 2022, pp. 43527–43537. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c12716

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.2c12716 2022

  20. [20]

    Renes, Renato Renner, and Ma rk M

    Lenguito, G., and Gomez, A., “Pressure-driven operation of microfabricated multiplexed electroSprays of ionic liquid solutions for space propulsion applications,”Journal of microelectromechanical systems, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2013, pp. 689–698. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2013.2283728

    work page doi:10.1109/jmems.2013.2283728 2013

  21. [21]

    The fluid dynamics of Taylor cones,

    Fernández de la Mora, J., “The fluid dynamics of Taylor cones,”Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., Vol. 39, 2007, pp. 217–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.39.050905.110159

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.39.050905.110159 2007

  22. [22]

    A planar array of micro-fabricated electrospray emitters for thruster applications,

    Velásquez-García, L. F., Akinwande, A. I., and Martínez-Sánchez, M., “A planar array of micro-fabricated electrospray emitters for thruster applications,”Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1272–1280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2006.879710

    work page doi:10.1109/jmems.2006.879710 2006

  23. [23]

    Emission performance of ionic liquid electrospray thruster for micropropulsion,

    Huang, C., Li, J., Li, M., Si, T., Xiong, C., and Fan, W., “Emission performance of ionic liquid electrospray thruster for micropropulsion,”Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2022, pp. 212–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/ 1.B37878

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Environmental and lifetime testing of the BET-300-P electrospray thruster,

    Fedkiw, T., Wood, Z. D., and Demmons, N. R., “Environmental and lifetime testing of the BET-300-P electrospray thruster,” AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2020 Forum, 2020, p. 3614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-3614

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2020-3614 2020

  25. [25]

    Multiplexed electrospray emission on a porous wedge,

    Wright, P. L., and Wirz, R. E., “Multiplexed electrospray emission on a porous wedge,”Physics of Fluids, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0030031

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0030031 2021

  26. [26]

    Colloid microthruster flight performance results from space technology 7 disturbance reduction system,

    Ziemer, J., Marrese-Reading, C., Dunn, C., Romero-Wolf, A., Cutler, C., Javidnia, S., Li, T., Li, I., Franklin, G., Barela, P., Hsu, O., Maghami, P., O’Donnell, J., Slutsky, J., Thorpe, J. I., Demmons, N., and Hruby, V., “Colloid microthruster flight performance results from space technology 7 disturbance reduction system,”35th International Electric Prop...

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    LISA colloid microthruster technology development plan and progress,

    Ziemer, J., Marrese-Reading, C. M., Arestie, S. M., Conroy, D. G., Leifer, S. D., Demmons, N. R., Gamero-Castaño, M., and Wirz, R. E., “LISA colloid microthruster technology development plan and progress,”36th International Electric Propulsion Conference, 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 132(21), 214102 (2010)

    Castro, S., and Fernández de la Mora, J., “Effect of tip curvature on ionic emissions from Taylor cones of ionic liquids from externally wetted tungsten tips,”Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 105, No. 3, 2009. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/1. 3073873. 26

    work page doi:10.1063/1 2009

  29. [29]

    Emission characteristics of passively fed electrospray microthrusters with propellant reservoirs,

    Krejci, D., Mier-Hicks, F., Thomas, R., Haag, T., and Lozano, P., “Emission characteristics of passively fed electrospray microthrusters with propellant reservoirs,”Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2017, pp. 447–458

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Ionic liquid ion sources: suppression of electrochemical reactions using voltage alternation,

    Lozano, P., and Martínez-Sánchez, M., “Ionic liquid ion sources: suppression of electrochemical reactions using voltage alternation,”Journal of colloid and interface science, Vol. 280, No. 1, 2004, pp. 149–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jcis.2004.07.037

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    Colloid thruster propellant stability after radiation exposure,

    Ziemer, J., Marrese-Reading, C., and Gamero-Castaño, M., “Colloid thruster propellant stability after radiation exposure,”39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEEJointPropulsionConferenceandExhibit , 2003, p.4853. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003- 4853

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2003- 2003

  32. [32]

    Fabrication of a high-density emitter array for electrospray thrusters using field emitter array process,

    Inoue, N., Nagao, M., Murakami, K., Khumpuang, S., Hara, S., and Takao, Y., “Fabrication of a high-density emitter array for electrospray thrusters using field emitter array process,”Japanese journal of applied physics, Vol. 58, No. SE, 2019, p. SEEG04. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7567/1347-4065/ab0fee

    work page doi:10.7567/1347-4065/ab0fee 2019

  33. [33]

    Ionic liquids database (ILThermo),

    Dong, Q., Kazakov, A. F., Muzny, C. D., Chirico, R. D., Widegren, J. A., Diky, V., Magee, J. W., Marsh, K. N., and Frenkel, M. D., “Ionic liquids database (ILThermo),” 2006

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    Imidazolium-based ionic liquids containing the trifluoroacetate anion: thermodynamic study,

    Zaitsau, D. H., and Verevkin, S. P., “Imidazolium-based ionic liquids containing the trifluoroacetate anion: thermodynamic study,”Journal of Solution Chemistry, Vol. 47, 2018, pp. 892–905

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Prediction of dielectric constant of ionic liquids,

    Rybinska-Fryca, A., Sosnowska, A., and Puzyn, T., “Prediction of dielectric constant of ionic liquids,”Journal of Molecular Liquids, Vol. 260, 2018, pp. 57–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.03.080

    work page doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2018.03.080 2018

  36. [36]

    Direct measurement of ion evaporation kinetics from electrified liquid surfaces,

    Gamero-Castaño, M., and Fernández de la Mora, J., “Direct measurement of ion evaporation kinetics from electrified liquid surfaces,”TheJournalofChemicalPhysics ,Vol.113,No.2,2000,pp.815–832. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481857

    work page doi:10.1063/1.481857 2000

  37. [37]

    Electrosprays of highly conducting liquids: A study of droplet and ion emission based on retarding potential and time-of-flight spectrometry,

    Gamero-Castaño, M., and Cisquella-Serra, A., “Electrosprays of highly conducting liquids: A study of droplet and ion emission based on retarding potential and time-of-flight spectrometry,”Physical Review Fluids, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2021, p. 013701. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.013701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.6.013701 2021

  38. [38]

    Numerical simulation of electrospraying in the cone-jet mode,

    Gamero-Castaño, M., and Magnani, M., “Numerical simulation of electrospraying in the cone-jet mode,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 859, 2019, pp. 247–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.832

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.832 2019

  39. [39]

    The steady cone-jet mode of electrospraying close to the minimum volume stability limit,

    Ponce-Torres, A., Rebollo-Muñoz, N., Herrada, M. A., Gañán-Calvo, A. M., and Montanero, J. M., “The steady cone-jet mode of electrospraying close to the minimum volume stability limit,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 857, 2018, pp. 142–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.737

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.737 2018

  40. [40]

    The minimum flow rate of electrosprays in the cone-jet mode,

    Gamero-Castaño, M., and Magnani, M., “The minimum flow rate of electrosprays in the cone-jet mode,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 876, 2019, pp. 553–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.569. 27

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2019.569 2019

  41. [41]

    Review on the physics of electrospray: From electrokinetics to the operating conditions of single and coaxial Taylor cone-jets, and AC electrospray,

    Ganán-Calvo, A. M., López-Herrera, J. M., Herrada, M. A., Ramos, A., and Montanero, J. M., “Review on the physics of electrospray: From electrokinetics to the operating conditions of single and coaxial Taylor cone-jets, and AC electrospray,” Journal of Aerosol Science, Vol. 125, 2018, pp. 32–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.05.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.05.002 2018

  42. [42]

    Cone-jetanalyticalextensionofTaylor’selectrostaticsolutionandtheasymptoticuniversalscalinglawsin electrospraying,

    Gañán-Calvo,A.M.,“Cone-jetanalyticalextensionofTaylor’selectrostaticsolutionandtheasymptoticuniversalscalinglawsin electrospraying,”Physicalreviewletters ,Vol.79,No.2,1997,p.217.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.217

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.217 1997

  43. [43]

    Electrostatic spraying of liquids in cone-jet mode,

    Cloupeau, M., and Prunet-Foch, B., “Electrostatic spraying of liquids in cone-jet mode,”Journal of electrostatics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1989, pp. 135–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(94)90199-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-8502(94)90199-6 1989

  44. [44]

    The minimum or natural rate of flow and droplet size ejected by Taylor cone–jets: physical symmetries and scaling laws,

    Gañán-Calvo, A. M., Rebollo-Muñoz, N., and Montanero, J., “The minimum or natural rate of flow and droplet size ejected by Taylor cone–jets: physical symmetries and scaling laws,”New Journal of Physics, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2013, p. 033035. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033035

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033035 2013

  45. [45]

    Qualitative analysis of the minimum flow rate of a cone-jet of a very polar liquid,

    Higuera, F. J., “Qualitative analysis of the minimum flow rate of a cone-jet of a very polar liquid,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 816, 2017, p. 428–441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.111

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.111 2017

  46. [46]

    Absolute to convective instability transition in charged liquid jets,

    López-Herrera, J. M., Gañán-Calvo, A. M., and Herrada, M. A., “Absolute to convective instability transition in charged liquid jets,”Physics of Fluids, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2010. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3446972

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3446972 2010

  47. [47]

    Modeling of electrosprays of ionic liquids including dissipation and self-heating,

    Magnani, M., Caballero-Pérez, M., and Gamero-Castaño, M., “Modeling of electrosprays of ionic liquids including dissipation and self-heating,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics (not yet published), 2025

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    R., Kar, M., and Pringle, J

    MacFarlane, D. R., Kar, M., and Pringle, J. M.,Fundamentals of ionic liquids: from chemistry to applications, John Wiley & Sons, 2017. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527340033

    work page doi:10.1002/9783527340033 2017

  49. [49]

    Electrospray ionization from nanopipette emitters with tip diameters of less than 100 nm,

    Yuill, E. M., Sa, N., Ray, S. J., Hieftje, G. M., and Baker, L. A., “Electrospray ionization from nanopipette emitters with tip diameters of less than 100 nm,”Analytical chemistry, Vol. 85, No. 18, 2013, pp. 8498–8502. https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1021/ac402214g

    work page doi:10.1021/ac402214g 2013

  50. [50]

    Reduced sampling size with nanopipette for tapping-mode scanning probe electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging,

    Kohigashi, T., Otsuka, Y., Shimazu, R., Matsumoto, T., Iwata, F., Kawasaki, H., and Arakawa, R., “Reduced sampling size with nanopipette for tapping-mode scanning probe electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging,”Mass Spectrometry, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2016, pp. S0054–S0054. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5702/massspectrometry.s0054

    work page doi:10.5702/massspectrometry.s0054 2016

  51. [51]

    Energy dissipation in electrosprays and the geometric scaling of the transition region of cone-jets,

    Gamero-Castaño, M., “Energy dissipation in electrosprays and the geometric scaling of the transition region of cone-jets,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 662, 2010, pp. 493–513. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112010003423

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022112010003423 2010

  52. [52]

    Analysis of self-heating in electrosprays operating in the cone-jet mode,

    Magnani, M., and Gamero-Castaño, M., “Analysis of self-heating in electrosprays operating in the cone-jet mode,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 980, 2024, p. A40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.59

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2024.59 2024

  53. [53]

    Increasing Specific Impulse in Electrospray Devices through Emitter Design,

    Caballero-Pérez, M., and Gamero-Castaño, M., “Increasing Specific Impulse in Electrospray Devices through Emitter Design,” 38th International Electric Propulsion Conference, 2024. 28

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Results of the successful 48000 h endurance test of a FEEP multi-emitter,

    Buldrini, N., Bettiol, L., Seifert, B., Plesescu, F., González del Amo, J., and Massotti, L., “Results of the successful 48000 h endurance test of a FEEP multi-emitter,”In 74th International Astronautical Congress, Baku, Azerbaijan, 2023

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Dissipation in cone-jet electrosprays and departure from isothermal operation,

    Gamero-Castaño, M., “Dissipation in cone-jet electrosprays and departure from isothermal operation,”Physical Review E, Vol. 99, 2019, p. 061101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.061101

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.99.061101 2019

  56. [56]

    Field induced ion evaporation from liquid surfaces at atmospheric pressure,

    Thomson, B., and Iribarne, J., “Field induced ion evaporation from liquid surfaces at atmospheric pressure,”The Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 71, No. 11, 1979, pp. 4451–4463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.438198

    work page doi:10.1063/1.438198 1979

  57. [57]

    A continuum model for ion evaporation from a drop: effect of curvatureandchargeonionsolvationenergy,

    Labowsky, M., Fenn, J. B., and Fernández de la Mora, J., “A continuum model for ion evaporation from a drop: effect of curvatureandchargeonionsolvationenergy,” AnalyticaChimicaActa ,Vol.406,No.1,2000,pp.105–118. https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00595-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(99)00595-4 2000

  58. [58]

    On the evaporation of small ions from charged droplets,

    Iribarne, J., and Thomson, B., “On the evaporation of small ions from charged droplets,”The Journal of chemical physics, Vol. 64, No. 6, 1976, pp. 2287–2294

    work page 1976

  59. [59]

    DirectandIndirectThrustMeasurementsofIonic-LiquidElectrosprayThrusterson a Magnetically-Levitated Testbed,

    Corrado,M.N.,Bruno,A.,andLozano,P.,“DirectandIndirectThrustMeasurementsofIonic-LiquidElectrosprayThrusterson a Magnetically-Levitated Testbed,”AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, 2024, p. 1344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024- 1344

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2024- 2024

  60. [60]

    Electric-field-induced ion evaporation from dielectric liquid,

    Gamero-Castaño, M., “Electric-field-induced ion evaporation from dielectric liquid,”Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, 2002, p. 147602

    work page 2002

  61. [61]

    Search for liquids electrospraying the smallest possible nanodrops in vacuo,

    Alonso-Matilla, R., Fernández-García, J., Congdon, H., and Fernández de la Mora, J., “Search for liquids electrospraying the smallest possible nanodrops in vacuo,”Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 116, No. 22, 2014, p. 224504. https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.4901635

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4901635 2014

  62. [62]

    Effect of operating variables on the propulsive performance of cone-jet electrosprays,

    Caballero-Pérez, M., and Gamero-Castaño, M., “Effect of operating variables on the propulsive performance of cone-jet electrosprays,”37th International Electric Propulsion Conference, 2022

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    The structure of electrospray beams in vacuum,

    Gamero-Castaño, M., “The structure of electrospray beams in vacuum,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 604, 2008, pp. 339–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112008001316

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022112008001316 2008

  64. [64]

    Mass flux and current density distributions of electrospray plumes,

    Thuppul, A., Collins, A., Wright, P., Uchizono, N., and Wirz, R., “Mass flux and current density distributions of electrospray plumes,”Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 130, No. 10, 2021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0056761

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0056761 2021

  65. [65]

    The expansion of colloid thruster beams and its dependence on emission temperature,

    Gamero-Castaño, M., “The expansion of colloid thruster beams and its dependence on emission temperature,”49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2013, p. 3880. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-3880. 29

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2013-3880 2013