REVIEW 1 cited by
Benchmarking Synthetic Tabular Data: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Framework
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Evaluating the quality of synthetic data remains a key challenge for ensuring privacy and utility in data-driven research. In this work, we present an evaluation framework that quantifies how well synthetic data replicates original distributional properties while ensuring privacy. The proposed approach employs a holdout-based benchmarking strategy that facilitates quantitative assessment through low- and high-dimensional distribution comparisons, embedding-based similarity measures, and nearest-neighbor distance metrics. The framework supports various data types and structures, including sequential and contextual information, and enables interpretable quality diagnostics through a set of standardized metrics. These contributions aim to support reproducibility and methodological consistency in benchmarking of synthetic data generation techniques. The code of the framework is available at https://github.com/mostly-ai/mostlyai-qa.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
TabQueryBench: A Query-Centric Benchmark for Synthetic Tabular Data
Across 49 datasets and 11 generators, distance-based fidelity overstates synthetic tabular quality: best query-centric score is only 0.75, with systematic failures on high-cardinality support, local conditionals, and ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.