Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Unified Generative Search and Recommendation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.05730 v2 pith:B66N74RR submitted 2025-04-08 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords recommendationsearchgenerativeidentifiersitemssignalstaskstrade-off
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern commercial platforms typically offer both search and recommendation functionalities to serve diverse user needs, making joint modeling of these tasks an appealing direction. While prior work has shown that integrating search and recommendation can be mutually beneficial, it also reveals a performance trade-off: enhancements in one task often come at the expense of the other. This challenge arises from their distinct information requirements: search emphasizes semantic relevance between queries and items, whereas recommendation depends more on collaborative signals among users and items. Effectively addressing this trade-off requires tackling two key problems: (1) integrating both semantic and collaborative signals into item representations, and (2) guiding the model to distinguish and adapt to the unique demands of search and recommendation. The emergence of generative retrieval with Large Language Models (LLMs) presents new possibilities. This paradigm encodes items as identifiers and frames both search and recommendation as sequential generation tasks, offering the flexibility to leverage multiple identifiers and task-specific prompts. In light of this, we introduce GenSAR, a unified generative framework for balanced search and recommendation. Our approach designs dual-purpose identifiers and tailored training strategies to incorporate complementary signals and align with task-specific objectives. Experiments on both public and commercial datasets demonstrate that GenSAR effectively reduces the trade-off and achieves state-of-the-art performance on both tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unifying Search and Recommendation in LLMs via Gradient Multi-Subspace Tuning

    cs.IR 2026-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    GEMS proposes a multi-subspace gradient-tuning framework for unified search and recommendation in LLMs, but its null-space projection equation is inverted and its adaptive gate has no training rule.

  2. Bridging Search and Recommendation through Latent Cross Reasoning

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A latent cross reasoning model with contrastive learning and GRPO reinforcement learning improves search-enhanced recommendation on Qilin and KuaiSAR.

  3. Similarity = Value? Consultation Value Assessment and Alignment for Personalized Search

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    VAPS outperforms semantic-similarity-only consultation alignment by scoring consultations with time decay, scenario scope, and posterior user actions and aligning them with actions via cross-attention.

  4. Continual Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey and tutorial that categorizes continual learning techniques for recommender systems into experience replay and regularization families and identifies future research directions.

Pith tools