REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey on Personalized and Pluralistic Preference Alignment in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Personalized preference alignment for large language models (LLMs), the process of tailoring LLMs to individual users' preferences, is an emerging research direction spanning the area of NLP and personalization. In this survey, we present an analysis of works on personalized alignment and modeling for LLMs. We introduce a taxonomy of preference alignment techniques, including training time, inference time, and additionally, user-modeling based methods. We provide analysis and discussion on the strengths and limitations of each group of techniques and then cover evaluation, benchmarks, as well as open problems in the field.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Simultaneous Multi-objective Alignment Across Verifiable and Non-verifiable Rewards
MAHALO aligns LLMs to multiple objectives in one model via per-objective action heads and PRM-guided decoding, improving math, value, and tutoring metrics jointly.
-
Procedural Fairness Failures in RLHF from Preference Averaging
In a synthetic preference-learning setup, PA-RLHF is reported to beat a single averaged reward model on group-level alignment, but the experiment appears to use ground-truth group labels to select the reward model, un...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.