Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DynaServe: Unified and Elastic Execution for Dynamic Disaggregated LLM Serving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.09285 v2 pith:DQBXFOZB submitted 2025-04-12 cs.DC

DynaServe: Unified and Elastic Execution for Dynamic Disaggregated LLM Serving

classification cs.DC
keywords timesdisaggregateddynaservegoodputlatencyprefillservingunder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

LLM inference must meet strict latency SLOs (e.g., 100 ms P99 time-between-tokens) while maximizing goodput. Yet, real-world variability in prompt and response lengths skews compute-intensive prefill and memory-bound decode phases, making both colocated (even with chunked prefill) and disaggregated deployments unable to simultaneously deliver low tail latency and high throughput. We introduce DynaServe, a high-performance LLM serving system built atop vLLM that unifies and extends both paradigms for maximizing goodput under SLO constraints, when handling unbalanced and dynamic workloads. It relies on a micro-request abstraction, which arbitrarily splits each request at any token boundary into at most two cooperating segments. A two-level scheduling framework then balances micro-request load across unified GPU instances. The global scheduler rapidly selects per-request split points by considering both the request's prefill/decode time ratio and the current load across GPU instances. The local schedulers on each GPU instance independently form SLO-aware batches, adjusting their composition in response to workload fluctuations, potential latency spikes and per-GPU under/over utilization. On real-world traces, DynaServe boosts the overall serving capacity from 1.15$\times$ to 3.07$\times$, improves goodput by up to 1.91$\times$ and 1.61$\times$, and improves the performance by up to 60\% in a hybrid workload under SLO compared to state-of-the-art colocated and disaggregated baselines.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ViBE: Co-Optimizing Workload Skew and Hardware Variability for MoE Serving

    cs.DC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ViBE co-optimizes expert placement with measured GPU performance variability in MoE inference to cut execution-time imbalance, delivering 14% better SLO attainment and up to 45% lower P90 TTFT.

  2. SMetric: Rethink LLM Scheduling for Serving Agents with Balanced Session-centric Scheduling

    cs.DC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Balancing only first-turn agent requests while keeping follow-ups cache-aware raises LLM cluster TPS 10-16% (colocation) and prefill TPS 2-34% (disaggregation) over SOTA schedulers on production agent traces.