Magnetically modified double slit based x-ray interferometry

A. Islegen-Wojdyla; A. Scholl; K. A. Goldberg; N. Burdet; S. A. Montoya; S. A. Morley; S. Atkar; S. Roy; Trinanjan Datta; Z. Tumbleson

arxiv: 2504.10586 · v1 · submitted 2025-04-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Magnetically modified double slit based x-ray interferometry

S. Atkar , Z. Tumbleson , S. A. Morley , N. Burdet , A. Islegen-Wojdyla , K. A. Goldberg , A. Scholl , S. A. Montoya

show 2 more authors

Trinanjan Datta S. Roy

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 19:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords x-ray interferometryXMCDmagnetic thin filmdouble slitrefractive indexfringe shiftsmagneto-optical effectsspin moment

0 comments

The pith

Covering one slit with a magnetic thin film in an x-ray double-slit setup determines both real and imaginary parts of the complex refractive index from magnetization-induced fringe shifts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to establish that a Young's double-slit x-ray interferometer can be modified by placing a magnetic thin film over one slit, allowing both the real and imaginary parts of the complex refractive index to be extracted from observed fringe shifts when the sample magnetization is reversed. A sympathetic reader would care because this merges x-ray magnetic circular dichroism with interferometry into a single measurement, directly tying the data to the electron spin moment without separate absorption and phase scans. If the approach holds, it supplies a practical route to probe magneto-optical properties of thin films at x-ray wavelengths.

Core claim

By covering one of two slits with a magnetic thin film and employing XMCD, fringe shifts that occur due to a change in the sample magnetization permit determination of both the real and the imaginary parts of the complex refractive index. The hybrid spectroscopic-interferometric methodology thereby provides a means to probe changes in the magnetic refractive index in terms of the electron spin moment.

What carries the argument

The magnetically modified Young's double slit, where one slit is covered by a magnetic thin film; it encodes magneto-optical modifications to the x-ray wave into measurable interference fringe shifts upon magnetization reversal.

If this is right

Both real and imaginary refractive-index components become accessible from a single set of interference measurements.
The method isolates spin-moment contributions to the refractive index through XMCD contrast.
Magnetization reversal serves as an internal control to separate magnetic from non-magnetic signals.
The technique supplies a combined spectroscopic and interferometric probe suited to magnetic thin films.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The setup could be extended to time-resolved x-ray sources to track dynamic magnetization processes.
It may link to phase-contrast x-ray imaging methods already used for magnetic domain visualization.
Systematic tests on films of varying thickness would help establish the range where non-magnetic artifacts remain negligible.

Load-bearing premise

The observed fringe shifts must arise solely from the magneto-optical modification of the refractive index in the magnetic film and not from mechanical, thermal, or non-magnetic optical changes when magnetization is reversed.

What would settle it

A control run with a non-magnetic film of identical thickness and material but no applied field or magnetization change that still produces identical fringe shifts would falsify the claim that the shifts originate from magnetic refractive-index effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.10586 by A. Islegen-Wojdyla, A. Scholl, K. A. Goldberg, N. Burdet, S. A. Montoya, S. A. Morley, S. Atkar, S. Roy, Trinanjan Datta, Z. Tumbleson.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Experimental fringe shift recorded through the magn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The rate of fringe shift as a function of the beamline [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Fraunhofer diffraction of a plane electromagnetic wav [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Flowchart outlining the workflow to extract the fring [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Intensity image of the fringe pattern generated by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Flowchart outlining the workflow to extract the absor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We demonstrate an experimental approach to determine magneto-optical effects which combines x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) with x-ray interferometry, based on the concepts of Young's canonical double slit. By covering one of two slits with a magnetic thin film and employing XMCD, we show that it is possible to determine both the real and the imaginary parts of the complex refractive index by measuring the fringe shifts that occur due to a change in the sample magnetization. Our hybrid spectroscopic-interferometric methodology provides a means to probe changes in the magnetic refractive index in terms of the electron spin moment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper outlines a double-slit x-ray interferometer with one slit coated in magnetic film to extract real and imaginary refractive-index shifts from magnetization reversal via XMCD, but the abstract supplies no data or artifact checks.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this work tries a hybrid interferometry-plus-XMCD geometry: cover one slit of a Young's double-slit with a magnetic thin film, reverse its magnetization, and read the resulting fringe shift to pull out both the real and imaginary parts of the magnetic refractive index at x-ray energies. The abstract frames it as a way to probe spin moments through changes in the complex index, which is a clean conceptual step beyond plain XMCD or standard x-ray interferometry alone. If the fringe shifts really track only the magneto-optical response, it could give a direct handle on materials where separating dispersive and absorptive magnetic contributions matters. The paper does a reasonable job stating the measurement principle without overclaiming. The geometry is simple enough that groups already running x-ray interferometers at synchrotrons could test it with modest changes. That said, the description stops at the intended principle. No numbers appear for the size of the observed shifts, no error bars, and no mention of controls that would separate refractive-index changes from mechanical or thermal effects when the field is flipped. Magnetostriction in the film or substrate, or even small temperature drifts, can move the optical path by amounts that look identical to an index shift in a single measurement. Without those checks shown, it is hard to judge whether the central claim holds in practice. This is the sort of paper that would interest people working on magneto-optical characterization or x-ray optics at facilities like ALS or ESRF. A reader already building interferometers or doing XMCD on thin films might see value in the geometry and want to try it. I would send it to peer review. The idea is specific enough to be worth expert scrutiny on the data and controls, even if the current write-up leaves those details open.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an experimental method combining x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) with Young's double-slit interferometry. One slit is covered by a magnetic thin film; fringe shifts induced by reversing the sample magnetization are used to extract both the real and imaginary parts of the complex refractive index, thereby probing magneto-optical effects linked to the electron spin moment.

Significance. If the central experimental claim is validated with adequate controls, the hybrid interferometric-XMCD approach would supply a direct, phase-sensitive route to the magnetic contribution to the x-ray refractive index that is complementary to conventional absorption-based XMCD. This could be useful for quantifying spin-dependent optical constants in thin-film and nanostructured magnetic materials.

major comments (1)

The central claim requires that measured fringe shifts upon magnetization reversal arise exclusively from the magneto-optical change in the complex refractive index of the film. The manuscript provides no quantitative upper bounds on possible non-magneto-optical contributions (e.g., magnetostrictive displacement of the slit or film, local heating, or geometric distortion) nor any control data that isolate these artifacts from the intended XMCD-induced shift. This assumption is load-bearing for the extraction of both real and imaginary index components.

minor comments (1)

The abstract states the measurement principle clearly but does not report numerical values, error bars, or fringe-visibility data; these should be added to the results section with explicit comparison to the expected magneto-optical signal magnitude.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recognizing the potential of our hybrid XMCD-interferometry approach as a complementary probe of magnetic contributions to the x-ray refractive index. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the validation of our central claim.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim requires that measured fringe shifts upon magnetization reversal arise exclusively from the magneto-optical change in the complex refractive index of the film. The manuscript provides no quantitative upper bounds on possible non-magneto-optical contributions (e.g., magnetostrictive displacement of the slit or film, local heating, or geometric distortion) nor any control data that isolate these artifacts from the intended XMCD-induced shift. This assumption is load-bearing for the extraction of both real and imaginary index components.

Authors: We agree that ruling out non-magneto-optical artifacts is essential for confidently attributing the observed fringe shifts to changes in the complex refractive index. The current manuscript does not include explicit quantitative upper bounds or dedicated control datasets for effects such as magnetostriction, local heating, or geometric distortions. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (likely in the Methods or Supplementary Information) that provides order-of-magnitude estimates for these contributions based on the experimental parameters (magnetic field strength, film thickness, x-ray flux, and material properties from the literature). We will also describe control measurements performed with non-magnetic reference films and with the magnetic film held at fixed magnetization to demonstrate that fringe shifts are absent when the XMCD contrast is removed. These additions will directly support the exclusivity assumption and improve the robustness of the extracted real and imaginary index values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental measurement of fringe shifts

full rationale

The paper describes an experimental setup combining Young's double-slit interferometry with XMCD on a magnetic thin film covering one slit. Fringe shifts upon magnetization reversal are measured directly to extract real and imaginary parts of the refractive index. No derivation chain, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps appear in the provided abstract or described methodology. The central claim rests on observed optical-path changes in a physical apparatus rather than any equation that reduces to its inputs by construction, rendering the result self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that fringe shifts are produced exclusively by the magnetic contribution to the refractive index; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Fringe shifts observed upon magnetization reversal are caused solely by the magneto-optical change in the complex refractive index of the film covering one slit.
Invoked when the authors state that fringe shifts allow determination of real and imaginary parts of the refractive index.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5670 in / 1304 out tokens · 62658 ms · 2026-05-22T19:26:23.047940+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

By covering one of two slits with a magnetic thin film and employing XMCD, it is possible to determine both the real and the imaginary parts of the complex refractive index by measuring the fringe shifts that occur due to a change in the sample magnetization.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

[1]

The peaks in the β(ω) ﬁts are consis- tent with the peaks seen in the total-electron-yield (TEY) data (shown in Fig

The two sharp peaks correspond to the Fe absorption edges and exhibit the XMCD ef- fect, appearing as a diﬀerential absorption between the two helical beams. The peaks in the β(ω) ﬁts are consis- tent with the peaks seen in the total-electron-yield (TEY) data (shown in Fig. 3(inset)). We note that the diﬀer- ential absorption is pronounced at the L3 edge,...

work page
[2]

∆Y extraction The workﬂow for extracting the ∆ Y parameter is sum- marized in Fig

IIA. ∆Y extraction The workﬂow for extracting the ∆ Y parameter is sum- marized in Fig

work page
[3]

In the ﬁrst step, Image compilation , the CCD intensity images are systematically organized into a data set as a function of the varying experimen- tal parameters, such as the applied magnetic ﬁeld ( B) or beamline energy ( E). In the next step, Image Pre- processing, we normalize by the beamline current to compensate for ﬂuctuations in synchrotron intens...

work page
[4]

IIB. β extraction To extract the β parameter from the intensity images, the images are organized into a data set in step 1, Im- age compilation , and pre-processed in step 2, Image pre-processing, following a method similar to that de- scribed earlier. The general procedure is described in the ﬂow chart in Fig

work page
[5]

For step 3, Data Fitting , we use the least-squares ﬁtting analysis and focus on one half of the intensity pattern, speciﬁcally excluding the beamstop region to avoid distortions caused by the blocked beam. To simplify the analysis, the intensity data is averaged along the direction perpendicular to the fringe pattern (X-direction), collapsing the two-dim...

work page
[6]

( 6) shown in the supplementary ﬁle [Eq.(2) of the main text]

The obtained intensity curve can now be ﬁt to Eq. ( 6) shown in the supplementary ﬁle [Eq.(2) of the main text]. Finally, in step 4, β plotting, the obtained β parameter is plotted as a function of the beamline en- ergy

work page
[7]

H. C. S. Joachim St¨ ohr, Magnetism: From Fundamen- tals to Nanoscale Dynamics (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007, London, 2007)

work page 2007
[8]

D. M. Jens Als-Nielsen, Elements of Modern X-ray Physics (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom, 2011)

work page 2011
[9]

Norman and A

P. Norman and A. Dreuw, Simulating x-ray spectro- scopies and calculating core-excited states of molecules, Chemical Reviews, Chemical Reviews 118, 7208 (2018)

work page 2018
[10]

Sakdinawat and D

A. Sakdinawat and D. Attwood, Nanoscale x-ray imag- ing, Nature Photonics 4, 840 (2010)

work page 2010
[11]

Sanchez-Cano, R

C. Sanchez-Cano, R. A. Alvarez-Puebla, J. M. Aben- droth, T. Beck, R. Blick, Y. Cao, F. Caruso, I. Chakraborty, H. N. Chapman, C. Chen, B. E. Co- hen, A. L. C. Concei¸ c˜ ao, D. P. Cormode, D. Cui, K. A. Dawson, G. Falkenberg, C. Fan, N. Feliu, M. Gao, E. Gargioni, C.-C. Gl¨ uer, F. Gr¨ uner, M. Hassan, Y. Hu, Y. Huang, S. Huber, N. Huse, Y. Kang, A. Khad...

work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c09563 2021
[12]

Saadeh, V

Q. Saadeh, V. Philipsen, J. Meersschaut, V. S. K. Chan- nam, K.-A. Kantre, A. Sokolov, B. Kupper, T. Wiesner, D. Oca˜ na Garc ´ ıa, Z. Salami, C. Buchholz, F. Scholze, and V. Soltwisch, Optical constants of tin, amorphous sio2, and sin in the extreme ultraviolet range, Applied Optics , Applied Optics 63, 9210 (2024)

work page 2024
[13]

J. Kas, F. Vila, C. Pemmaraju, M. Prange, K. Pers- son, R. Yang, and J. Rehr, Full spectrum op- tical constant interface to the materials project, Computational Materials Science 201, 110904 (2022)

work page 2022
[14]

Lucarini, J

V. Lucarini, J. Saarinen, K. Peiponen, and E. Vartiainen, Kramers-kronig relations in optical materials research, Kramers-Kronig Relations in Optical Materials Research, by V. Lucarini, J. Saarinen, K. Peiponen, and E. Varti- ainen. X, 162 p. 37 illus. 3-540-23673-2. Berlin: Springer,

work page
[15]

Blume and D

M. Blume and D. Gibbs, Polarization dependence of mag- netic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B 37, 1779 (1988)

work page 1988
[16]

J. P. Hill and D. F. McMorrow, Resonant Exchange Scat- tering: Polarization Dependence and Correlation Func- tion, Acta Crystallographica Section A 52, 236 (1996)

work page 1996
[17]

B. T. Thole, P. Carra, F. Sette, and G. van der Laan, X-ray circular dichroism as a probe of orbital magnetiza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1943 (1992)

work page 1943
[18]

C. Kao, J. B. Hastings, E. D. Johnson, D. P. Sid- dons, G. C. Smith, and G. A. Prinz, Magnetic-resonance exchange scattering at the iron lii and liii edges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 373 (1990)

work page 1990
[19]

Carra, B

P. Carra, B. T. Thole, M. Altarelli, and X. Wang, X-ray circular dichroism and local magnetic ﬁelds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 694 (1993)

work page 1993
[20]

J. W. Freeland, K. Bussmann, Y. U. Idzerda, and C.-C. Kao, Understanding correlations be- tween chemical and magnetic interfacial roughness, Phys. Rev. B 60, R9923 (1999)

work page 1999
[21]

S. Roy, M. R. Fitzsimmons, S. Park, M. Dorn, O. Pe- tracic, I. V. Roshchin, Z.-P. Li, X. Batlle, R. Morales, A. Misra, X. Zhang, K. Chesnel, J. B. Kortright, S. K. Sinha, and I. K. Schuller, Depth proﬁle of uncompensated spins in an exchange bias system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 047201 (2005)

work page 2005
[22]

Foroosh, J

H. Foroosh, J. Zerubia, and M. Berthod, Exten- sion of phase correlation to subpixel registration, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 11, 188 (2002)

work page 2002
[23]

K. A. Goldberg and J. Bokor, Fourier- transform method of phase-shift determination, Appl. Opt. 40, 2886 (2001)

work page 2001
[24]

M. Born, E. Wolf, A. B. Bhatia, P. C. Clemmow, D. Ga- bor, A. R. Stokes, A. M. Taylor, P. A. Wayman, and W. L. Wilcock, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diﬀraction of Light, 7th ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

work page 1999
[25]

D. P. Jackson, N. Ferris, R. Strauss, H. Li, and B. J. Pearson, Subtleties with Young’s double-slit experiment: Investigation of spatial coherence and fringe visibility, American Journal of Physics 86, 683 (2018)

work page 2018
[26]

Savitzky and M

A. Savitzky and M. J. E. Golay, Smoothing and diﬀer- entiation of data by simpliﬁed least squares procedures., Analytical Chemistry 36, 1627 (1964)

work page 1964
[27]

Attwood, Soft X-Rays and Extreme Ultraviolet Radia- tion: Principles and Applications (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

D. Attwood, Soft X-Rays and Extreme Ultraviolet Radia- tion: Principles and Applications (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

work page 1999
[28]

J. B. Kortright and S.-K. Kim, Resonant magneto-optical properties of fe near its 2 p levels: Measurement and ap- plications, Phys. Rev. B 62, 12216 (2000)

work page 2000
[29]

Rudolf, F

P. Rudolf, F. Sette, L. Tjeng, G. Meigs, and C. Chen, Magnetic moments in a gadolinium iron garnet studied by soft-x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 109, 109 (1992)

work page 1992

[1] [1]

The peaks in the β(ω) ﬁts are consis- tent with the peaks seen in the total-electron-yield (TEY) data (shown in Fig

The two sharp peaks correspond to the Fe absorption edges and exhibit the XMCD ef- fect, appearing as a diﬀerential absorption between the two helical beams. The peaks in the β(ω) ﬁts are consis- tent with the peaks seen in the total-electron-yield (TEY) data (shown in Fig. 3(inset)). We note that the diﬀer- ential absorption is pronounced at the L3 edge,...

work page

[2] [2]

∆Y extraction The workﬂow for extracting the ∆ Y parameter is sum- marized in Fig

IIA. ∆Y extraction The workﬂow for extracting the ∆ Y parameter is sum- marized in Fig

work page

[3] [3]

In the ﬁrst step, Image compilation , the CCD intensity images are systematically organized into a data set as a function of the varying experimen- tal parameters, such as the applied magnetic ﬁeld ( B) or beamline energy ( E). In the next step, Image Pre- processing, we normalize by the beamline current to compensate for ﬂuctuations in synchrotron intens...

work page

[4] [4]

IIB. β extraction To extract the β parameter from the intensity images, the images are organized into a data set in step 1, Im- age compilation , and pre-processed in step 2, Image pre-processing, following a method similar to that de- scribed earlier. The general procedure is described in the ﬂow chart in Fig

work page

[5] [5]

For step 3, Data Fitting , we use the least-squares ﬁtting analysis and focus on one half of the intensity pattern, speciﬁcally excluding the beamstop region to avoid distortions caused by the blocked beam. To simplify the analysis, the intensity data is averaged along the direction perpendicular to the fringe pattern (X-direction), collapsing the two-dim...

work page

[6] [6]

( 6) shown in the supplementary ﬁle [Eq.(2) of the main text]

The obtained intensity curve can now be ﬁt to Eq. ( 6) shown in the supplementary ﬁle [Eq.(2) of the main text]. Finally, in step 4, β plotting, the obtained β parameter is plotted as a function of the beamline en- ergy

work page

[7] [7]

H. C. S. Joachim St¨ ohr, Magnetism: From Fundamen- tals to Nanoscale Dynamics (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007, London, 2007)

work page 2007

[8] [8]

D. M. Jens Als-Nielsen, Elements of Modern X-ray Physics (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom, 2011)

work page 2011

[9] [9]

Norman and A

P. Norman and A. Dreuw, Simulating x-ray spectro- scopies and calculating core-excited states of molecules, Chemical Reviews, Chemical Reviews 118, 7208 (2018)

work page 2018

[10] [10]

Sakdinawat and D

A. Sakdinawat and D. Attwood, Nanoscale x-ray imag- ing, Nature Photonics 4, 840 (2010)

work page 2010

[11] [11]

Sanchez-Cano, R

C. Sanchez-Cano, R. A. Alvarez-Puebla, J. M. Aben- droth, T. Beck, R. Blick, Y. Cao, F. Caruso, I. Chakraborty, H. N. Chapman, C. Chen, B. E. Co- hen, A. L. C. Concei¸ c˜ ao, D. P. Cormode, D. Cui, K. A. Dawson, G. Falkenberg, C. Fan, N. Feliu, M. Gao, E. Gargioni, C.-C. Gl¨ uer, F. Gr¨ uner, M. Hassan, Y. Hu, Y. Huang, S. Huber, N. Huse, Y. Kang, A. Khad...

work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c09563 2021

[12] [12]

Saadeh, V

Q. Saadeh, V. Philipsen, J. Meersschaut, V. S. K. Chan- nam, K.-A. Kantre, A. Sokolov, B. Kupper, T. Wiesner, D. Oca˜ na Garc ´ ıa, Z. Salami, C. Buchholz, F. Scholze, and V. Soltwisch, Optical constants of tin, amorphous sio2, and sin in the extreme ultraviolet range, Applied Optics , Applied Optics 63, 9210 (2024)

work page 2024

[13] [13]

J. Kas, F. Vila, C. Pemmaraju, M. Prange, K. Pers- son, R. Yang, and J. Rehr, Full spectrum op- tical constant interface to the materials project, Computational Materials Science 201, 110904 (2022)

work page 2022

[14] [14]

Lucarini, J

V. Lucarini, J. Saarinen, K. Peiponen, and E. Vartiainen, Kramers-kronig relations in optical materials research, Kramers-Kronig Relations in Optical Materials Research, by V. Lucarini, J. Saarinen, K. Peiponen, and E. Varti- ainen. X, 162 p. 37 illus. 3-540-23673-2. Berlin: Springer,

work page

[15] [15]

Blume and D

M. Blume and D. Gibbs, Polarization dependence of mag- netic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B 37, 1779 (1988)

work page 1988

[16] [16]

J. P. Hill and D. F. McMorrow, Resonant Exchange Scat- tering: Polarization Dependence and Correlation Func- tion, Acta Crystallographica Section A 52, 236 (1996)

work page 1996

[17] [17]

B. T. Thole, P. Carra, F. Sette, and G. van der Laan, X-ray circular dichroism as a probe of orbital magnetiza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1943 (1992)

work page 1943

[18] [18]

C. Kao, J. B. Hastings, E. D. Johnson, D. P. Sid- dons, G. C. Smith, and G. A. Prinz, Magnetic-resonance exchange scattering at the iron lii and liii edges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 373 (1990)

work page 1990

[19] [19]

Carra, B

P. Carra, B. T. Thole, M. Altarelli, and X. Wang, X-ray circular dichroism and local magnetic ﬁelds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 694 (1993)

work page 1993

[20] [20]

J. W. Freeland, K. Bussmann, Y. U. Idzerda, and C.-C. Kao, Understanding correlations be- tween chemical and magnetic interfacial roughness, Phys. Rev. B 60, R9923 (1999)

work page 1999

[21] [21]

S. Roy, M. R. Fitzsimmons, S. Park, M. Dorn, O. Pe- tracic, I. V. Roshchin, Z.-P. Li, X. Batlle, R. Morales, A. Misra, X. Zhang, K. Chesnel, J. B. Kortright, S. K. Sinha, and I. K. Schuller, Depth proﬁle of uncompensated spins in an exchange bias system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 047201 (2005)

work page 2005

[22] [22]

Foroosh, J

H. Foroosh, J. Zerubia, and M. Berthod, Exten- sion of phase correlation to subpixel registration, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 11, 188 (2002)

work page 2002

[23] [23]

K. A. Goldberg and J. Bokor, Fourier- transform method of phase-shift determination, Appl. Opt. 40, 2886 (2001)

work page 2001

[24] [24]

M. Born, E. Wolf, A. B. Bhatia, P. C. Clemmow, D. Ga- bor, A. R. Stokes, A. M. Taylor, P. A. Wayman, and W. L. Wilcock, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diﬀraction of Light, 7th ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

work page 1999

[25] [25]

D. P. Jackson, N. Ferris, R. Strauss, H. Li, and B. J. Pearson, Subtleties with Young’s double-slit experiment: Investigation of spatial coherence and fringe visibility, American Journal of Physics 86, 683 (2018)

work page 2018

[26] [26]

Savitzky and M

A. Savitzky and M. J. E. Golay, Smoothing and diﬀer- entiation of data by simpliﬁed least squares procedures., Analytical Chemistry 36, 1627 (1964)

work page 1964

[27] [27]

Attwood, Soft X-Rays and Extreme Ultraviolet Radia- tion: Principles and Applications (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

D. Attwood, Soft X-Rays and Extreme Ultraviolet Radia- tion: Principles and Applications (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

work page 1999

[28] [28]

J. B. Kortright and S.-K. Kim, Resonant magneto-optical properties of fe near its 2 p levels: Measurement and ap- plications, Phys. Rev. B 62, 12216 (2000)

work page 2000

[29] [29]

Rudolf, F

P. Rudolf, F. Sette, L. Tjeng, G. Meigs, and C. Chen, Magnetic moments in a gadolinium iron garnet studied by soft-x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 109, 109 (1992)

work page 1992