Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 95 references

Large Cold Dust Reservoir Revealed in Transitional SN Ib 2014C by James Webb Space Telescope Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read JWST mid-infrared spectroscopy of SN 2014C at 3477 days post-explosion reveals a tenfold increase in dust mass, to about 0.078 solar masses, with new grains probably condensing in the cold dense shell between the forward and reverse shocks.

desk verdict The JWST spectrum is a real step forward, but the 'tenfold dust increase' headline is softer than it looks because the 2019 baseline fit was not unique. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14009 v2 pith:2IKEG3R5 submitted 2025-04-18 astro-ph.HE

Samaporn Tinyanont , Ori D. Fox , Melissa Shahbandeh , Tea Temim , Robert Williams , Kittipong Wangnok , Armin Rest , Ryan M. Lau
show 27 more authors
Keiichi Maeda Jacob E. Jencson Katie Auchettl Alexei V. Filippenko Conor Larison Christopher Ashall Thomas Brink Kyle W. Davis Luc Dessart Ryan J. Foley Lluís Galbany Matthew Grayling Joel Johansson Mansi M. Kasliwal Zachary G. Lane Natalie LeBaron Dan Milisavljevic Jeonghee Rho Itsuki Sakon Arkaprabha Sarangi Tamas Szalai Kirsty Taggart Schuyler D. Van Dyk Qinan Wang Yi Yang WeiKang Zheng Szanna Zsíros
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords supernova2014Ccircumstellarmediuminteractiondustformationcolddenseshellmid-infraredspectroscopyJWSTMIRIstellarmassloss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports JWST MIRI MRS and NIRSpec IFU spectra of the transitional Type Ib/IIn supernova 2014C nearly ten years after explosion. Its central claim is that the supernova now contains about 0.078 solar masses of dust, mostly cold carbonaceous grains at about 291 K and silicate grains at about 207 K, roughly ten times the minimum dust mass inferred from Spitzer-era data four years earlier. The authors argue this jump is not an artifact of broader wavelength coverage, and that the most likely origin is new grain growth in the cold dense shell between the forward and reverse shocks. If right, SN 2014C joins the dustiest supernovae known and strengthens the case that core-collapse supernovae, especially interacting ones, can contribute substantially to the dust seen in high-redshift galaxies.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on fitting the full mid-infrared spectrum with a sum of modified blackbody dust components through $F_\mathrm{dust}(\lambda) = B(\lambda,T_\mathrm{dust}) \kappa(\lambda) M_\mathrm{dust} P_\mathrm{esc}(\tau)/d^2$, using carbonaceous and silicate opacities from Draine and Lee with 0.1 $\mu$m grains and an escape probability $P_\mathrm{esc}(\tau)$. The fit requires three components, and Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling gives the cold masses and temperatures. The second load-bearing piece is the comparison with the Spitzer-era light-curve model, a $\rho \propto r^{-2}$ wind profile, which predicts a smooth luminosity decline; because the JWST bolometric luminosity matches that prediction, the paper rules out an additional dense circumstellar component as the source of the extra dust mass. The new dust location is identified with the cold dense shell between the forward and reverse shocks, where a few solar masses of processed circumstellar material and ejecta provide enough material to condense $0.078\ M_\odot$ at a plausible gas-to-dust ratio.

What would settle it

Re-fit the Spitzer-era (days 1620 to 2200) spectral energy distribution with a three-component model that includes a cold about 250 K dust component. If such a model fits the old photometry with about 0.03 solar masses of cold dust without worsening the fit, the tenfold increase collapses toward a factor of two and the case for fresh condensation in the cold dense shell is largely gone; a later JWST epoch showing continued mass growth and cooling would strengthen the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At 3477 rest-frame days post-explosion, JWST MIRI MRS spectroscopy covering 4.9 to 27.9 $\mu$m and NIRSpec IFU data at 1.66 to 5.27 $\mu$m show the bolometric luminosity of SN 2014C still tracking the same wind-like circumstellar-medium interaction model fitted to Spitzer data. Fitting the mid-infrared continuum with a three-component dust model yields a total dust mass of $0.0780 \pm 0.0006\ M_\odot$, mass-averaged temperature about 245 K: $0.0355\ M_\odot$ of carbonaceous dust at 291 K, $0.0425\ M_\odot$ of silicate dust at 207 K, and a small warm component of $2.3 \times 10^{-5}\ M_\odot$ at about 850 K. The paper concludes that the minimum dust mass required to fit the spectral energy distribution has increased by an order of magnitude since the Spitzer-era observations at days 1620 to 2200, and that this increase, together with the drop in dust temperature from about 500 K to about 250 K, indicates fresh grain condensation in the cold dense shell between the forward and reverse shocks rather than pre-existing circumstellar dust.

Load-bearing premise

The claim of a tenfold increase assumes the 2019 Spitzer-era fit captured essentially all the dust present at that time; the paper itself notes that fit could not exclude a cold about 0.03 solar mass component, which would shrink the increase to roughly a factor of two.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the tenfold increase is real, SN 2014C joins SN 2005ip and other interacting supernovae as one of the dustiest known, with cold dust mass comparable to what is needed to explain dust at high redshift.
  • The result implies that dust production in supernovae continues for nearly a decade after explosion, so single-epoch or early-time surveys likely miss most of the final dust mass.
  • Interacting stripped-envelope supernovae, not just Type IIn events, can be significant dust factories, linking binary-induced mass loss to cosmic dust enrichment.
  • If new grains condense in the cold dense shell, the dust should be spatially located at the shock shell and should grow further as more material is processed, yielding a testable prediction for future JWST epochs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct re-analysis of the 2019 Spitzer photometry with a cold about 250 K component included would settle the size of the true increase; the paper itself notes that the 2019 fit was not unique.
  • Applying the same three-component fitting approach to other delayed-interaction stripped-envelope supernovae could reveal whether late cold dust growth is generic or peculiar to SN 2014C's circumstellar geometry.
  • If the dust really lies in the cold dense shell, high-resolution mid-infrared imaging at later epochs might resolve the emitting region at about $3 \times 10^{17}$ cm, while the absence of continued mass growth would favor pre-existing dust being progressively heated.
  • The line-profile evidence for an asymmetric CSM suggests that connecting the dust spatial distribution to that asymmetry through radiative-transfer modeling would test whether the cold dust is preferentially located on the near side.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports JWST MIRI MRS and NIRSpec IFU observations of the interacting Type Ib/IIn SN 2014C at 3477–3568 days post-explosion, together with new Keck optical/NIR spectra and Subaru COMICS photometry. The authors model the 1.7–25 micron SED with three dust components (warm carbonaceous, cold carbonaceous at ~291 K, and cold silicate at ~207 K), deriving a total dust mass of 0.0780 solar masses at a mass-averaged temperature of ~245 K. The bolometric luminosity is found to be consistent with the semianalytic CSM-interaction model fit to earlier Spitzer data, and the paper interprets the factor-of-ten increase in the minimum dust mass relative to the ~1620-day Spitzer/COMICS epoch as evidence for new dust condensation in the cold dense shell between the forward and reverse shocks.

Significance. The paper presents a carefully reduced, late-time mid-IR view of a unique interacting stripped-envelope SN, with strong technical strengths: host subtraction using a dedicated aperture, astrometric alignment with JHAT, a synthetic-photometry sanity check, and transparent MCMC fitting with reported posteriors. If the dust-mass increase and its interpretation as new grain formation in the cold dense shell hold, this is an important data point for supernova dust production and for the high-redshift dust budget. The line-profile analysis of helium, forbidden oxygen, and [Ne II] lines also provides a coherent picture of an asymmetric CSM. However, the central quantitative claim rests on a comparison baseline that the authors themselves concede is non-unique, and the new-dust interpretation is therefore not as secure as the abstract implies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.3 and Figure 4(b)] The central claim of a tenfold dust-mass increase is not currently supported by the analysis as presented. The comparison baseline is the minimum dust mass from the Tinyanont et al. (2019) fit at ~1620 days, but the paper states in Section 3.3 that this fit 'is not unique, and cannot rule out a more massive dust component (~0.03 Msun) at ~250 K.' If such a component were present at 1620 days, the increase to the JWST value of 0.078 Msun is roughly a factor of two to three, not ten, and the evidence for new grain condensation in the cold dense shell is substantially weakened. The counterarguments offered in Section 3.3 do not close this gap: the absence of red-wing suppression excludes dust inside the ejecta, not pre-existing cool dust in the CSM; the expectation that newly formed CDS dust at 1620 days should be warmer than at 3477 days does not apply to a pre-existing cool component; and the bolometric light-curve agreement does not by itself rule out such a component. I recommend that the authors re-fit the 2019 Spitzer+COMICS SED with a two-temperature dust model (or otherwise bound the allowed cold-dust mass at 1620 days) and base the abstract and conclusion on that result, or explicitly reframe the claim as an increase in the minimum dust mass.
  2. [Section 3.2 and Section 3.3] The bolometric-luminosity argument used to exclude a pre-existing dust component farther out is not quantitative. The paper states that the observed bolometric luminosity agrees with the Tinyanont et al. (2019) semianalytic model and that the 'lack of extra luminosity' rules out more pre-existing dust farther from the SN. However, a cooler dust component at ~250 K would emit predominantly at 10–20 micron with a lower luminosity per unit mass, so a modest additional mass could hide within the model uncertainty without producing an obvious bolometric excess. The authors should either compute a quantitative upper limit on the mass of an additional cool dust component allowed by the bolometric comparison, or soften the claim that the bolometric light curve rules out the pre-existing-dust alternative.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3.3] The 'tenfold increase' wording in the abstract and conclusion should be qualified as an increase in the minimum dust mass required to fit the SED, since both the Spitzer-era and JWST-era values are minimum masses and the earlier value is subject to the degeneracy noted in Section 3.3.
  2. [Table 1] The formal statistical uncertainties on the dust masses (e.g., 0.0005 Msun for the 0.0355 Msun component) are much smaller than the systematic uncertainties from distance and opacity; the text mentions the distance uncertainty, but the abstract and Figure 4(b) would be clearer if the mass-increase factor were reported with a range that reflects the dominant systematic uncertainty.
  3. [Section 2.1] The JHAT alignment correction is applied to the MRS coordinates, but the text does not state the magnitude of the applied R.A./decl. offset; reporting this value would help readers assess the alignment quality.
  4. [Section 4.4] In the [Ne II] luminosity calculation, the assumption n = 10^3 cm^-3 forms the lower end of the allowed density range; the derived radius of 3.5e16 cm is therefore only an upper-limit-like estimate, and this caveat should be stated explicitly in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dust masses are fitted from the JWST data, and the supporting bolometric check against the Tinyanont et al. (2019) model is independent. The main caveat is an admitted degeneracy in the 2019 baseline, which weakens the magnitude of the claimed tenfold increase but is not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities — the three dust components with masses 2.30e-5, 0.0355, and 0.0425 Msun — are obtained by fitting Equation (1) to the JWST spectrum with free temperature, mass, radius, and composition, using MCMC with flat priors. This is model fitting, not circular derivation: the fitted parameters are not defined in terms of the conclusion, and the fit does not take the 2019 dust mass as an input. The bolometric-luminosity check is an independent test: the Tinyanont et al. (2019) semianalytic model was fit only to Spitzer-era data, and its prediction is then compared with the JWST epoch luminosity; because the model constants were not set using the JWST data, agreement is genuine external support rather than circular confirmation. The paper also performs a control by fitting synthetic photometry in the old Spitzer/COMICS bands from the JWST spectrum, which addresses the concern that the mass increase is merely an artifact of broader wavelength coverage. The most serious limitation is stated explicitly in Section 3.3: the 2019 SED fit 'is not unique, and cannot rule out a more massive dust component (~0.03 Msun) at ~250 K,' and the fit 'simply used the least amount of dust to explain the observed SED.' This is a real degeneracy that could reduce the claimed tenfold increase to roughly a factor of two if a cooler, more massive component were present at 1620 days. However, that is a robustness/overstatement issue, not circularity: the JWST dust mass is not derived from the 2019 mass, and the comparison of two minimum-mass fits is an empirical comparison, not a reduction of the conclusion to its inputs. No equation in the paper reduces to another by construction, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely from same-author prior work. The reliance on Tinyanont et al. (2019) is heavy but the cited model is externally falsifiable and is in fact tested by the new JWST luminosity. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained; the score is 1 reflecting the mild but non-circular impact of the admitted baseline degeneracy and the heavy use of prior work by the same group.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central inference rests on a standard dust-emission model with seven fitted parameters (six component temperatures and masses plus a radius), on adopted opacity and grain-size assumptions, and on the prior CSM density model from Tinyanont et al. (2019). No genuinely new physical entities are introduced. The most consequential assumption is that the 2019 minimum-dust SED fit is a complete census; the paper itself flags this as uncertain.

free parameters (7)
  • Warm dust temperature T_h = 850 +/- 4 K
    Fitted to the near-infrared excess in the JWST spectrum.
  • Warm dust mass M_h = (2.30 +/- 0.05) x 10^-5 solar masses
    Fitted to the near-infrared to mid-infrared flux level.
  • Cold carbonaceous dust temperature T_c,C = 291 +/- 1 K
    Fitted to the overall mid-infrared continuum shape.
  • Cold carbonaceous dust mass M_c,C = 0.0355 +/- 0.0005 solar masses
    Fitted with the cold silicate component to reproduce the continuum and the lack of strong silicate features.
  • Cold silicate dust temperature T_c,Si = 207 +/- 1 K
    Fitted to the 11 and 18 micron silicate features.
  • Cold silicate dust mass M_c,Si = 0.0425 +/- 0.0003 solar masses
    Fitted to the strength of the silicate features relative to the carbonaceous component.
  • Dust shell radius R = log r = 17.582 +/- 0.007 (cm)
    Left free because the shock velocity at this phase is unclear; it sets the optical depth and escape probability in the dust model.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Draine and Lee (1984) and Laor and Draine (1993) opacities for 0.1 micron grains accurately represent the dust in SN 2014C.
    Used in Eq. 1; the inferred dust mass is inversely proportional to the assumed opacity, so an opacity error propagates linearly into the mass.
  • domain assumption All dust grains have radius 0.1 microns and no grains larger than 1 micron are present.
    Stated in Section 3.1; the authors argue the IR spectral shape is insensitive to grain size, but the mass normalization is set by the adopted opacity.
  • domain assumption The dust is optically thin and distributed spherically, so the Cox and Mathews escape probability applies.
    Equations 2 and 3; the authors note tau is about 0.15 and argue geometry does not affect results because R is a free parameter.
  • domain assumption The Tinyanont et al. (2019) wind-like CSM profile with density proportional to r^-2.01 remains valid at 3477 days.
    Used in Section 3.2 to compare bolometric luminosity and in Section 3.3 to argue the increased dust mass is not pre-existing dust in a denser CSM; the model was fit to Spitzer data only, so it is an external benchmark.
  • domain assumption The 2019 minimum-dust SED fit provides a complete baseline census of the dust at 1620 to 2200 days.
    The paper itself in Section 3.3 admits this fit 'cannot rule out a more massive dust component (~0.03 Msun) at ~250 K'; the tenfold increase depends on this baseline.
  • domain assumption The adopted distance to NGC 7331 is 14.7 Mpc.
    Dust mass scales as distance squared; the authors note the distance uncertainty of about 8 percent dominates the systematic mass uncertainty.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large Cold Dust Reservoir Revealed in Transitional SN Ib 2014C by James Webb Space Telescope Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2IKEG3R5

@misc{pith2026250414009,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large Cold Dust Reservoir Revealed in Transitional SN Ib 2014C by James Webb Space Telescope Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2IKEG3R5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14009}
}
abstract

Supernova (SN) 2014C is a rare transitional event that exploded as a hydrogen-poor, helium-rich Type Ib SN and subsequently interacted with a hydrogen-rich circumstellar medium (CSM) a few months post-explosion. This unique interacting object provides an opportunity to probe the mass-loss history of a stripped-envelope SN progenitor. Using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), we observed SN 2014C with the Mid-Infrared Instrument Medium Resolution Spectrometer at 3477 days post-explosion (rest frame), and the Near-Infrared Spectrograph Integral Field Unit at 3568 days post-explosion, covering 1.7 to 25 $\mu$m. The bolometric luminosity indicates that the SN is still interacting with the same CSM that was observed with the Spitzer Space Telescope 40--1920 days post-explosion. JWST spectra and near-contemporaneous optical and near-infrared spectra show strong [Ne II] 12.831 $\mu$m, He 1.083 $\mu$m, H$\alpha$, and forbidden oxygen ([O I] $\lambda$$\lambda$6300, 6364, [O II] $\lambda$$\lambda$7319, 7330, and [O III] $\lambda$$\lambda$4959, 5007) emission lines with asymmetric profiles, suggesting a highly asymmetric CSM. The mid-IR continuum can be explained by ~$0.036 \ M_\odot$ of carbonaceous dust at ~300 K and ~0.043 $M_\odot$ of silicate dust at ~200 K. The observed dust mass has increased tenfold since the last Spitzer observation 4 yr ago, with evidence suggesting that new grains have condensed in the cold dense shell between the forward and reverse shocks. This dust mass places SN 2014C among the dustiest SNe in the mid-IR and supports the emerging observational trend that SN explosions produce enough dust to explain the observed dust mass at high redshifts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14009 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top: images of SN 2014C from MIRI MRS slice at the rest wavelength of [Ne II] 12.813 µm (left), continuum at 12.824 µm (center), and HST/WFC3 F555W (right; PID 16691; PI Foley). The SN is marked with a cross. North is up, and east is to the left in all images. The HST image was used to align the MIRI parallel image, and applied to the MIRI MRS data. The [Ne II] 12.813 µm image is representative of the complex host e… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. New optical spectra of SN 2014C from 3131, 3230, and 3789 days compared with earlier spectra from Mauerhan et al. (2018) at 269 and 619 days, and from Thomas et al. (2022) at 955, 1273, and 2487 days (note that we merge their red and blue spectra taken at similar time to cover a wider wavelength coverage and report the average epoch). The spectrum of SN 2012au at 2270 days from Milisavljevic et al. (2018) is provide… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: NIR to mid-IR spectrum of SN 2014C from JWST NIRSpec IFU and MIRI MRS, from 3568 and 3477 days post-explosion, respectively. The IR spectra and photometry of SN 2014C at 1623 days published by Tinyanont et al. (2019), along with all mid-IR data of SNe IIn from before 2019 (also shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Dust-temperature evolution of SN 2014C. Orange points are from Spitzer 3.6 to 4.5 µm observations, and the red point is from Spitzer plus a ground-based 9.7 µm image from Tinyanont et al. (2019). These measurements are photometric, and the dust models have a mixtur…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The evolution of the observed dust mass in SN 2014C compared with select CCSNe. These comparison objects are from Shahbandeh et al. (2024) and references therein. velocity corresponds to the reverse shock propagating deeper into the lower-velocity part of the ejecta. A…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top: comparisons between the He I 5876 ˚A, 1.083 µm, and 2.059 µm lines, as well as [O III] 5007 ˚A at around 270, 1300, 1650, and 3800 days post-explosion. The optical spectrum at 269 d showing He I λ5876 and [O III] is from Mauerhan et al. (2018). The optical spectra…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: MIRI MRS spectrum showing [Ne II] 12.813 µm (top) and [Ne III] 15.550 µm (bottom). The absolute flux is provided in Fλ and the dust continuum has been subtracted. In the top panel, the scaled line profile of [O II] λ7319 from day 3789 is provided for comparison. In the…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    2021, , 655, A98, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141279

    Agliozzo , C., Phillips , N., Mehner , A., et al. 2021, , 655, A98, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141279

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141279 2021

  2. [2]

    R., et al

    Argyriou , I., Glasse , A., Law , D. R., et al. 2023, , 675, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346489

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 2023

  3. [3]

    E., & Kassim , N

    Balasubramanian , A., Corsi , A., Polisensky , E., Clarke , T. E., & Kassim , N. E. 2021, , 923, 32, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2154

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2154 2021

  4. [4]

    R., & Davies , B

    Beasor , E. R., & Davies , B. 2018, , 475, 55, 10.1093/mnras/stx3174

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3174 2018

  5. [5]

    R., Davies , B., Smith , N., et al

    Beasor , E. R., Davies , B., Smith , N., et al. 2020, , 492, 5994, 10.1093/mnras/staa255

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa255 2020

  6. [6]

    R., & Smith , N

    Beasor , E. R., & Smith , N. 2022, , 933, 41, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6dcf

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6dcf 2022

  7. [7]

    F., Bartel , N., Kamble , A., et al

    Bietenholz , M. F., Bartel , N., Kamble , A., et al. 2021, , 502, 1694, 10.1093/mnras/staa4003

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa4003 2021

  8. [8]

    F., Kamble , A., Margutti , R., Milisavljevic , D., & Soderberg , A

    Bietenholz , M. F., Kamble , A., Margutti , R., Milisavljevic , D., & Soderberg , A. 2018, , 475, 1756, 10.1093/mnras/stx3194

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3194 2018

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    L., Birkmann , S

    B \"o ker , T., Beck , T. L., Birkmann , S. M., et al. 2023, , 135, 038001, 10.1088/1538-3873/acb846

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    2022, , 939, 105, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b14

    Brethauer , D., Margutti , R., Milisavljevic , D., et al. 2022, , 939, 105, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b14

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    A., Chugai , N., Milisavljevic , D., & Fransson , C

    Chandra , P., Chevalier , R. A., Chugai , N., Milisavljevic , D., & Fransson , C. 2020, , 902, 55, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb460

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    N., & Chevalier , R

    Chugai , N. N., & Chevalier , R. A. 2006, , 641, 1051, 10.1086/500539

    2006 doi

  5. [13]

    G., Carter , B., et al

    Cohen , M., Walker , R. G., Carter , B., et al. 1999, , 117, 1864, 10.1086/300813

    1999 doi

  6. [14]

    P., & Mathews , W

    Cox , D. P., & Mathews , W. G. 1969, , 155, 859, 10.1086/149916

    1969 doi

  7. [15]

    de Jager , C., Nieuwenhuijzen , H., & van der Hucht , K. A. 1988, , 72, 259

    1988

  8. [16]

    2024, , 692, A204, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451983

    Dessart , L. 2024, , 692, A204, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451983

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    T., & Lee , H

    Draine , B. T., & Lee , H. M. 1984, , 285, 89, 10.1086/162480

    1984 doi

  10. [18]

    R., G \"o tberg , Y., Ludwig , B

    Drout , M. R., G \"o tberg , Y., Ludwig , B. A., et al. 2023, Science, 382, 1287, 10.1126/science.ade4970

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    R., Soderberg , A

    Drout , M. R., Soderberg , A. M., Gal-Yam , A., et al. 2011, , 741, 97, 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/97

    2011 doi

  12. [20]

    J., Fraser , M., Smartt , S

    Eldridge , J. J., Fraser , M., Smartt , S. J., Maund , J. R., & Crockett , R. M. 2013, , 436, 774, 10.1093/mnras/stt1612

    2013 doi

  13. [21]

    2024, , 529, L33, 10.1093/mnrasl/slad195

    Ferrari , L., Folatelli , G., Kuncarayakti , H., et al. 2024, , 529, L33, 10.1093/mnrasl/slad195

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    A., Gerardy , C

    Fesen , R. A., Gerardy , C. L., Filippenko , A. V., et al. 1999, , 117, 725, 10.1086/300751

    1999 doi

  15. [23]

    Filippenko , A. V. 1997, , 35, 309, 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309

    1997 doi

  16. [24]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306, 10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    D., Chevalier , R

    Fox , O. D., Chevalier , R. A., Dwek , E., et al. 2010, , 725, 1768, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/1768

    2010 doi

  18. [26]

    D., Filippenko , A

    Fox , O. D., Filippenko , A. V., Skrutskie , M. F., et al. 2013, , 146, 2, 10.1088/0004-6256/146/1/2

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    D., Chevalier , R

    Fox , O. D., Chevalier , R. A., Skrutskie , M. F., et al. 2011, , 741, 7, 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/7

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    D., Van Dyk , S

    Fox , O. D., Van Dyk , S. D., Williams , B. F., et al. 2022, , 929, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5890

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    L., Madore , B

    Freedman , W. L., Madore , B. F., Gibson , B. K., et al. 2001, , 553, 47, 10.1086/320638

    2001 doi

  22. [30]

    2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed

    Gal-Yam , A. 2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed. A. W. Alsabti & P. Murdin , 195, 10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_35

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    2021, Transient Name Server AstroNote, 76, 1

    Gal-Yam , A., Yaron , O., Pastorello , A., et al. 2021, Transient Name Server AstroNote, 76, 1

    2021

  24. [32]

    P., S \'a nchez , S

    Galbany , L., Anderson , J. P., S \'a nchez , S. F., et al. 2018, , 855, 107, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaf20

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    D., Hayward , T

    Gehrz , R. D., Hayward , T. L., Houck , J. R., et al. 1995, , 439, 417, 10.1086/175184

    1995 doi

  26. [34]

    2022, , 661, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    Jakobsen , P., Ferruit , P., Alves de Oliveira , C., et al. 2022, , 661, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    M., Bally , J., Masci , F., et al

    Kasliwal , M. M., Bally , J., Masci , F., et al. 2017, , 839, 88, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6978

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    2000, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Kataza , H., Okamoto , Y., Takubo , S., et al. 2000, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4008, Optical and IR Telescope Instrumentation and Detectors, ed. M. Iye & A. F. Moorwood , 1144--1152, 10.1117/12.395433

    2000 doi

  29. [37]

    D., Drout , M

    Kilpatrick , C. D., Drout , M. R., Auchettl , K., et al. 2021, , 504, 2073, 10.1093/mnras/stab838

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    2014, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 3777, 1

    Kim , M., Zheng , W., Li , W., et al. 2014, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 3777, 1

    2014

  31. [39]

    2019, , 872, 135, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaff6b

    Kokubo , M., Mitsuda , K., Morokuma , T., et al. 2019, , 872, 135, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaff6b

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    P., Kuncarayakti , H., Maeda , K., & Mattila , S

    Kravtsov , T., Anderson , J. P., Kuncarayakti , H., Maeda , K., & Mattila , S. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.06504, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.06504

    2024 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    P., Galbany , L., et al

    Kuncarayakti , H., Anderson , J. P., Galbany , L., et al. 2018, , 613, A35, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731923

    2018 doi

  34. [42]

    2023, , 678, A209, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346526

    Kuncarayakti , H., Sollerman , J., Izzo , L., et al. 2023, , 678, A209, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346526

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    Laor , A., & Draine , B. T. 1993, , 402, 441, 10.1086/172149

    1993 doi

  36. [44]

    S., Sugerman , B

    Lawrence , S. S., Sugerman , B. E., Bouchet , P., et al. 2000, , 537, L123, 10.1086/312771

    2000 doi

  37. [45]

    D., Bersier , D., James , P

    Lyman , J. D., Bersier , D., James , P. A., et al. 2016, , 457, 328, 10.1093/mnras/stv2983

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    2017, , 835, 140, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/140

    Margutti , R., Kamble , A., Milisavljevic , D., et al. 2017, , 835, 140, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/140

    2017 doi

  39. [47]

    D., et al

    Mauerhan , J., Smith , N., Van Dyk , S. D., et al. 2015, , 450, 2551, 10.1093/mnras/stv257

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    C., Filippenko , A

    Mauerhan , J. C., Filippenko , A. V., Zheng , W., et al. 2018, , 478, 5050, 10.1093/mnras/sty1307

    2018 doi

  41. [49]

    J., Chevalier , R

    Milisavljevic , D., Patnaude , D. J., Chevalier , R. A., et al. 2018, , 864, L36, 10.3847/2041-8213/aadd4e

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    2015, , 815, 120, 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/120

    Milisavljevic , D., Margutti , R., Kamble , A., et al. 2015, , 815, 120, 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/120

    2015 doi

  43. [51]

    2024, , 965, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad324b

    Milisavljevic , D., Temim , T., De Looze , I., et al. 2024, , 965, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad324b

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    J., Maeda , K., Taddia , F., et al

    Moriya , T. J., Maeda , K., Taddia , F., et al. 2013, , 435, 1520, 10.1093/mnras/stt1392

    2013 doi

  45. [53]

    2007, Science, 315, 1103, 10.1126/science.1136351

    Morris , T., & Podsiadlowski , P. 2007, Science, 315, 1103, 10.1126/science.1136351

    2007 doi

  46. [54]

    2024, , 976, 230, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8922

    Myers , C., De , K., Yan , L., et al. 2024, , 976, 230, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8922

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    B., Cohen , J

    Oke , J. B., Cohen , J. G., Carr , M., et al. 1995, , 107, 375, 10.1086/133562

    1995 doi

  48. [56]

    2024, , 977, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8ac8

    Orlando , S., Greco , E., Hirai , R., et al. 2024, , 977, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8ac8

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    2008, , 389, 113, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13602.x

    Pastorello , A., Mattila , S., Zampieri , L., et al. 2008, , 389, 113, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13602.x

    2008

  50. [58]

    A., Terreran , G., et al

    Pellegrino , C., Howell , D. A., Terreran , G., et al. 2022, , 938, 73, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8ff6

    2022 doi

  51. [59]

    Perley , D. A. 2019, , 131, 084503, 10.1088/1538-3873/ab215d

    2019 doi

  52. [60]

    C., & Hsu , J

    Podsiadlowski , P., Joss , P. C., & Hsu , J. J. L. 1992, , 391, 246, 10.1086/171341

    1992 doi

  53. [61]

    C., Vink \'o , J., et al

    Pooley , D., Wheeler , J. C., Vink \'o , J., et al. 2019, , 883, 120, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e36

    2019 doi

  54. [62]

    2020 a , The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308, 10.21105/joss.02308

    Prochaska , J., Hennawi , J., Westfall , K., et al. 2020 a , The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308, 10.21105/joss.02308

    2020 doi

  55. [63]

    X., Hennawi , J., Cooke , R., et al

    Prochaska , J. X., Hennawi , J., Cooke , R., et al. 2020 b , pypeit/PypeIt: Release 1.0.0 , v1.0.0, Zenodo, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3743493

    2020 doi

  56. [64]

    2023, The JWST HST Alignment Tool (JHAT) , v2, Zenodo, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7892935

    Rest , A., Pierel , J., Correnti , M., et al. 2023, The JWST HST Alignment Tool (JHAT) , v2, Zenodo, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7892935

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    D., Van Dyk , S

    Ryder , S. D., Van Dyk , S. D., Fox , O. D., et al. 2018, , 856, 83, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaf1e

    2018 doi

  58. [66]

    E., de Koter , A., et al

    Sana , H., de Mink , S. E., de Koter , A., et al. 2012, Science, 337, 444, 10.1126/science.1223344

    2012 doi

  59. [67]

    2022, , 668, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244391

    Sarangi , A. 2022, , 668, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244391

    2022 doi

  60. [68]

    Schlegel , E. M. 1990, , 244, 269

    1990

  61. [69]

    2023, , 523, 6048, 10.1093/mnras/stad1681

    Shahbandeh , M., Sarangi , A., Temim , T., et al. 2023, , 523, 6048, 10.1093/mnras/stad1681

    2023 doi

  62. [70]

    D., Temim , T., et al

    Shahbandeh , M., Fox , O. D., Temim , T., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.09142, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.09142

    2024 doi arXiv

  63. [71]

    2017, , 129, 054201, 10.1088/1538-3873/aa54a6

    Shivvers , I., Modjaz , M., Zheng , W., et al. 2017, , 129, 054201, 10.1088/1538-3873/aa54a6

    2017 doi

  64. [72]

    2014, , 52, 487, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025

    Smith , N. 2014, , 52, 487, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025

    2014 doi

  65. [73]

    2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed

    ---. 2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed. A. W. Alsabti & P. Murdin , 403, 10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_38

    2017 doi

  66. [75]

    V., & Chornock , R

    Smith , N., Li , W., Filippenko , A. V., & Chornock , R. 2011 b , , 412, 1522, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.17229.x

    2011

  67. [76]

    J., Bloom , J

    Smith , N., Foley , R. J., Bloom , J. S., et al. 2008, , 686, 485, 10.1086/590141

    2008 doi

  68. [77]

    2020, , 643, A79, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038960

    Sollerman , J., Fransson , C., Barbarino , C., et al. 2020, , 643, A79, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038960

    2020 doi

  69. [78]

    Sonneborn , G., Pun , C. S. J., Kimble , R. A., et al. 1998, , 492, L139, 10.1086/311106

    1998 doi

  70. [79]

    R., & Crowther , P

    Sun , N.-C., Maund , J. R., & Crowther , P. A. 2020, , 497, 5118, 10.1093/mnras/staa2277

    2020 doi

  71. [80]

    2023, , 521, 2860, 10.1093/mnras/stad690

    ---. 2023, , 521, 2860, 10.1093/mnras/stad690

    2023 doi

  72. [81]

    D., Pejcha , O., & M \"u ller , T

    Szalai , T., Zs \' ros , S., Fox , O. D., Pejcha , O., & M \"u ller , T. 2019, , 241, 38, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab10df

    2019 doi

  73. [82]

    2021, , 650, A174, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039068

    Tartaglia , L., Sollerman , J., Barbarino , C., et al. 2021, , 650, A174, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039068

    2021 doi

  74. [83]

    P., Wheeler , J

    Thomas , B. P., Wheeler , J. C., Dwarkadas , V. V., et al. 2022, , 930, 57, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5fa6

    2022 doi

  75. [84]

    M., Fox , O

    Tinyanont , S., Kasliwal , M. M., Fox , O. D., et al. 2016, , 833, 231, 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/231

    2016 doi

  76. [85]

    M., Kasliwal , M

    Tinyanont , S., Lau , R. M., Kasliwal , M. M., et al. 2019, , 887, 75, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab521b

    2019 doi

  77. [86]

    J., Taggart , K., et al

    Tinyanont , S., Foley , R. J., Taggart , K., et al. 2024, , 136, 014201, 10.1088/1538-3873/ad1b39

    2024 doi

  78. [87]

    Waters , L. B. F. M., Morris , P. W., Voors , R. H. M., Lamers , H. J. G. L. M., & Trams , N. R. 1998, , 255, 179, 10.1023/A:1001145110961

    1998 doi

  79. [88]

    W., Glasse , A., et al

    Wells , M., Pel , J. W., Glasse , A., et al. 2015, , 127, 646, 10.1086/682281

    2015 doi

  80. [89]

    C., Henderson , C

    Wilson , J. C., Henderson , C. P., Herter , T. L., et al. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5492, Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy, ed. A. F. M. Moorwood & M. Iye , 1295--1305, 10.1117/12.550925

    2004 doi

  81. [90]

    E., Van Dyk , S

    Zapartas , E., de Mink , S. E., Van Dyk , S. D., et al. 2017, , 842, 125, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7467

    2017 doi

  82. [91]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.07146, 10.48550/arXiv.2207.07146

    Zenati , Y., Wang , Q., Bobrick , A., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.07146, 10.48550/arXiv.2207.07146

    2022 doi arXiv

  83. [92]

    2025, , 978, 163, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9c76

    Zhai , Q., Zhang , J., Lin , W., et al. 2025, , 978, 163, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9c76

    2025 doi

  84. [93]

    V., & Cenko , S

    Zheng , W., Li , W., Filippenko , A. V., & Cenko , S. B. 2014, The Astronomer's Telegram, 5721, 1

    2014

  85. [94]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.stat...

  86. [95]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.d...

  87. [96]

    j=͹h&f-?< 96w k mYc7 [>V|Ρ=Kܼ N?s b < yJyZ] y77O. SS

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' en...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.