REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 27 references
Critical Ising model, Multiple SLE$_\kappa\left(\frac{\kappa-6}{2},\frac{\kappa-6}{2}\right)$ and $\beta$-Jacobi Ensemble
T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper proves that multiple $N$-SLE$_\kappa((\kappa-6)/2,(\kappa-6)/2)$ is unique, builds it twice from GFF flow lines, identifies its coalesced-start hitting points with $\beta$-Jacobi ensembles at $\beta=8/\kappa$, and shows…
desk verdict A serious SLE/Ising paper whose advertised β-Jacobi identification does not survive a change of variables; the constructions are real, but Corollary 1.8 needs a major correction. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The carrying mechanism is the imaginary-geometry flow-line construction of the Gaussian free field. The random input is a set of auxiliary boundary points $z_j$ or $w_j$ drawn from the explicit densities (1.3)/(1.4) and their same-start variants (1.5)/(1.6); the exponents in those densities, $-4/\kappa$, $(6-\kappa)/\kappa$, $(2-\kappa)/\kappa$ and $8/\kappa$, are exactly what makes the integrals Selberg-type and ultimately produces the Jacobi-ensemble parameters. The GFF is assigned stepwise boundary data $\lambda-2N\lambda$, $\lambda(1-2N+2(j-1))$, and so on, at the starting points $x_j$ and at the sampled points; the $N$ curves are the flow lines issued from $x_j$ or from the common point $x$ with angles $2\lambda(j-1)/\chi$. The cascade relations in Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2 express the law of the last curve as a fixed SLE weighted by a martingale involving the partition functions $Z_N$ and $W_N$, and they identify the conditional law of the remaining $N-1$ curves recursively; the partition-function identity (3.19) then forces the two couplings $P_N$ and $Q_N$ to coincide. Uniqueness is proved by a Markov chain that resamples one curve at a time from its defining conditional law, with the hard positivity estimate (3.20) supplied by absolute continuity of the flow lines on subdomains (Lemma 3.4).
What would settle it
For $N=2$, run the two couplings $P_2$ and $Q_2$ directly from the densities (1.3) and (1.4), simulate the GFF flow lines, and compare the distribution of the hitting point of the second curve: any difference would disprove the claimed equality of laws (Theorem 1.3). Alternatively, check positivity (3.20) for two tubes brought arbitrarily close to tangency; a zero transition probability would localize the failure in Lemma 3.4.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
Fix $N\ge 1$ and $\kappa\in(0,4)$. The paper calls a probability measure on $N$ disjoint simple curves, running from prescribed boundary points to a common boundary arc, a multiple $N$-SLE$_\kappa((\kappa-6)/2,(\kappa-6)/2)$ if each curve's conditional law given the others is chordal SLE$_\kappa((\kappa-6)/2,(\kappa-6)/2)$ in the domain left by the other curves, with the neighbouring endpoints as force points. The central discovery is that this defining property is enough: the measure is unique when it exists (Theorem 1.3), and likewise for the variant where all curves start at the same point (Theorem 1.7). The paper then constructs the measure explicitly. It samples $M$ or $N-M$ auxiliary points on the boundary arc from the Selberg-type densities (1.3) or (1.4), gives the Gaussian free field piecewise-constant boundary data that jumps by multiples of $\lambda=\pi/\sqrt{\kappa}$ at the starting points and at the sampled points, and takes the $N$ flow lines with angles $2\lambda(j-1)/\chi$, where $\chi=2/\sqrt{\kappa}-\sqrt{\kappa}/2$. These two constructions have the same law (Lemma 3.3), so the hitting points of the odd-indexed curves are distributed by (1.3) and those of the even-indexed curves by (1.4) (Corollary 1.4). When all starting points collapse to one point, inversion turns these laws into the $\operatorname{Jacobi}(M;8/\kappa,\ldots)$ and $\operatorname{Jacobi}(N-M;8/\kappa,\ldots)$ ensembles (Corollary 1.8).
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that the adapted Markov-chain uniqueness proof is valid—specifically that the positivity estimate (3.20) holds because the flow-line laws remain comparable when restricted to smaller domains; if either point fails, the two constructions could differ and the hitting-point and Ising conclusions would not follow.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The two distinct flow-line constructions in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 carry the same law, so any quantity of the multiple SLE—transition kernels, crossing events, endpoint laws—can be computed in whichever coupling is more convenient.
- The hitting points of odd- and even-indexed curves have the explicit Selberg-type densities (1.3) and (1.4), and in the common-start limit they become intertwined $\beta$-Jacobi ensembles with $\beta=8/\kappa$.
- For the critical Ising model with alternating/free boundary, the probability that all $N$ interfaces end on the free boundary arc has the explicit conformal scaling limit (1.7) in terms of $Z_N$, $W_N$ and the Ising partition function $R_N$.
- Conditioned on that event, the interface tuple $(\gamma_1^\delta,\ldots,\gamma_N^\delta)$ converges under the curve metric to the $\kappa=3$ member of the multiple SLE family.
- The uniqueness theorem (Theorem 1.3) makes the characterization complete: any future construction satisfying the same conditional law describes the same object.
Reading between the lines
- Inference: if the uniqueness argument is sound, the same Markov-chain/positivity strategy should characterize other chordal multiple SLE$_\kappa(\rho)$ families with fixed extreme force points, wherever the relevant flow-line restriction is absolutely continuous.
- Inference: the exact appearance of $\beta$-Jacobi ensembles suggests that GFF flow-line configurations with marked boundary points form a natural ambient space for random-matrix spectra; a testable extension would be to couple the $z_j/w_j$ points to the eigenvalues of the tridiagonal Jacobi matrix model.
- Inference: the explicit formula (1.7) can be checked numerically for small $N$ by simulating critical Ising interfaces on $\delta\mathbb{Z}^2$ and comparing the empirical probability that all interfaces hit the free arc with the predicted scaling limit.
- Inference: carrying the same flow-line construction to $\kappa=16/3$ would produce the analogous statement for FK-Ising interfaces or other alternating boundary patterns, with a different $\beta=8/\kappa$ value; the paper does not treat this case.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper introduces a family of multiple chordal SLEs with two force points of weight (κ-6)/2, called multiple N-SLE_κ((κ-6)/2,(κ-6)/2), and gives two GFF-flow-line constructions with explicitly sampled hitting points (Theorems 1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 1.6). It claims uniqueness of this multiple SLE from its conditional law (Theorems 1.3 and 1.7), derives the joint law of the hitting points on the target arc (Corollaries 1.4 and 1.8), and claims that after shrinking all starting points to one point the hitting points converge to β-Jacobi ensembles with β=8/κ. The paper then applies these objects to the critical Ising model: Theorem 1.9 gives the asymptotic probability of the event that all N discrete interfaces end on the free arc, and the conditional convergence of the interface tuple to the multiple SLE with κ=3.
Significance. If the main claims are correct, this paper would provide an explicit, conformally invariant endpoint distribution for a nontrivial family of multiple SLEs and a direct SLE-to-β-Jacobi connection, in addition to a rigorous conditional scaling limit for multiple critical Ising interfaces with mixed boundary conditions. The cascade computations in Section 3, especially the partition-function identity (3.19), are explicit and checkable, and the constructions via GFF flow lines with densities (1.3)–(1.6) are concrete enough to test directly. However, the advertised Jacobi corollary is false as stated, and the uniqueness arguments that support the endpoint laws are incomplete. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's central claims, so the significance is conditional on substantial revision.
major comments (4)
- [Section 4, Corollary 1.8] A direct change of variables contradicts the stated Jacobi parameters. For N=2, M=1, the density (1.5) with x=0, u=1 is C 1_{1<z_1} z_1^{-8/κ}(z_1-1)^{(6-κ)/κ}. Setting y=ψ(z_1)=1/z_1 gives density C' y^{(2-κ)/κ}(1-y)^{(6-κ)/κ}, which by the definition in Section 2.3 is Jacobi(1;8/κ,(2-κ)/κ,(6-κ)/κ), not Jacobi(1;8/κ,1/2,3/2) as claimed. The equations (2-κ)/κ=1/2 and (6-κ)/κ=3/2 have no common solution; at the Ising value κ=3 the derived exponents are -1/3 and 1. In general the odd-endpoint density in the y=1/z coordinates is proportional to ∏_j y_j^{(4N-8M+2-κ)/κ}(1-y_j)^{(6-κ)/κ}∏_{i<j}|y_i-y_j|^{8/κ}, and the even-endpoint density is proportional to ∏_j y_j^{(4N-8(N-M)+6-κ)/κ}(1-y_j)^{(2-κ)/κ}∏_{i<j}|y_i-y_j|^{8/κ}. Corollary 1.8 is therefore not a minor misprint but a wrong parameter identification; the advertised SLE–β-Jacobi connection must be corrected (the relation β=8/κ itself is unchanged).
- [Section 3, Proof of Theorem 1.3] The uniqueness theorem is load-bearing for Corollary 1.4 and Theorem 1.7, but as written the proof is only an outline. After Lemma 3.3 the text states: "The proof is almost the same as the proof of [Zha24, Theorem 4.2] and we only give the outline below." The key positivity estimate (3.20) is not proved in the manuscript: the three-step construction of the sets A_j yields (3.22) only if Lemma 3.4 supplies the required positive transition probability, but Lemma 3.4 is dispatched by saying "This is same as the proof of [Yu23, Lemma 3.1]", without checking that the cited hypotheses apply to SLE_κ((κ-6)/2,(κ-6)/2) in the required tubes and without proving the claimed absolute continuity of the corresponding flow lines on subdomains. Since the identification of the two constructions and the hitting-point formulas both rely on uniqueness, this gap is central rather than cosmetic.
- [Section 4, Proof of Theorem 1.7] The same-start uniqueness proof has two serious gaps affecting Corollary 1.8. First, the passage from (4.8) to (4.9) invokes "monotone convergence" for the integrals of ∂_{v_2} log U(g_s(x_-), W_s, g_s(u)); no monotonicity or sign property of this integrand is shown, and the stopping times σ_{ϵ0} depend on ϵ0, so the stated almost-sure limit is not justified. Second, the proof of Theorems 1.5 and 1.6 says "the same proof still works" when x_1=...=x_N, but the cascade lemmas in Section 3 then involve force points that are no longer distinct; the manuscript does not prove that the flow-line hitting descriptions from Section 2.2, or the defining conditional-law property, survive this degeneration. Both issues are load-bearing because Corollary 1.8 rests on Theorem 1.7.
- [Section 1.2 and Theorem 1.9] There is an unflagged inconsistency in the announced value of κ for the Ising application. The paragraph before Theorem 1.9 says the conditional interface tuple converges to the multiple N-SLE with "κ = 8/3", while Theorem 1.9 itself, the abstract, and all of Section 5 (for example Lemma 5.4 with h=1/2 and κ=3) use κ=3. Since the choice of κ determines which SLE is the claimed scaling limit, this contradiction must be resolved.
minor comments (6)
- [Theorem 1.9 statement] The statement says "ϕ(x_{2N+2})=∞", which should presumably be ϕ(x_{N+2})=∞; the subscript appears to be a typo.
- [Lemma 5.3] In the displayed inclusions, the term ∂B(x^δ_{N+1},ϵ) appears twice where the second occurrence should involve x^δ_{N+2}.
- [Figure captions] Figure 1.4 and Figure 1.5 are captioned as illustrations of Theorem 1.1, but they illustrate the same-start constructions of Theorems 1.5 and 1.6 respectively.
- [Section 2.2, properties of Q_N] In the bullet point for Q_N, the sentence "η_{m-1} is on the left to η_m for 2≤ℓ≤N" uses the wrong index ℓ; it should be "for 2≤m≤N".
- [References] The reference [Yu23] has an incomplete title: "Time-reversal of multiple-force-point chordal ." ends with a dangling period; the missing word should be supplied.
- [Section 1.2] There is a typo in "Recall the definitio of partition function"; it should be "definition".
Circularity Check
No load-bearing circularity; the uniqueness and Ising derivation are self-contained given the cited external inputs, and the beta-Jacobi statement is a change-of-variables restatement rather than an independent prediction.
full rationale
The paper's central derivations are not circular. Theorem 1.3 (uniqueness) is proved by a Markov-chain argument explicitly modeled on the external results [BPW21, Theorem 1.2] and [Zha24, Theorem 4.2]; the author states that a crucial lemma of [BPW21] does not hold and supplies a modification relying on Lemma 3.4, which in turn cites [Yu23, Lemma 3.1] with a one-line justification. These are external, non-self-cited inputs, so the uniqueness claim does not reduce to the author's own prior work. The two constructions in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 are explicit probability measures on GFF flow lines with density (1.3)/(1.4); Lemma 3.3 directly proves they coincide, and Theorem 1.1/1.2 then verify the defining conditional-law property. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The beta-Jacobi relation is a direct read-off: after the change of variables psi(z)=1/z, the constructed densities (1.5)/(1.6) have the Jacobi ensemble form with pair exponent 8/kappa, so beta=8/kappa is obtained from the construction rather than being an independent empirical output; this is not circular because the Jacobi ensemble is defined by that density form, and the connection is a legitimate identification. However, the specific exponents a,b stated in Corollary 1.8 appear inconsistent with the same change of variables (e.g., for N=2, kappa=3, Theorem 1.5 gives a y-exponent of -1/3 rather than 1/2); this is a correctness concern, not a circularity. Similarly, the Ising application in Theorem 1.9 is a scaling-limit derivation building on [Izy15] and [FWY24] for the Ising partition function and on Lemma 3.3 for the SLE partition functions; no step of that proof presupposes the conclusion. The self-citations [FLPW24] and [LPW24] appear only in the introductory literature survey and are not load-bearing. The uniqueness proof is admittedly an outline and depends on the external absolute-continuity result [Yu23, Lemma 3.1]; that is a completeness risk but does not make the argument circular.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- beta = 8/kappa (Jacobi parameter) =
8/kappa
assumptions (7)
- standard math GFF flow-line theory of Miller-Sheffield [MS16a], including existence, interaction, and SLE_kappa(rho) law of flow lines.
- standard math Absolute continuity of flow lines on subdomains, Lemma 3.4, asserted by the same proof as [Yu23, Lemma 3.1].
- ad hoc to paper The Markov-chain uniqueness strategy of Zhan [Zha24, Theorem 4.2] extends to multiple SLE with (kappa-6)/2 force points.
- standard math Izyurov's convergence of Ising interfaces and the Feng-Wu-Yang SDE (5.1) for the limiting driving function.
- standard math Strong RSW bounds for critical FK-Ising crossings [CDCH16, Corollary 1.7].
- standard math Non-vanishing of the partition functions R_N on Xi_{N+1} [Izy15, Remark 2.5].
- standard math Domain Markov property and monotonicity for the critical Ising model.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Critical Ising model, Multiple SLE$_\kappa\left(\frac{\kappa-6}{2},\frac{\kappa-6}{2}\right)$ and $\beta$-Jacobi Ensemble." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JNNL2XOV
@misc{pith2026250414595,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Critical Ising model, Multiple SLE$_\kappa\left(\frac\kappa-62,\frac\kappa-62\right)$ and $\beta$-Jacobi Ensemble},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JNNL2XOV}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14595}
}
abstract
Fix $N\ge 1$ and suppose that $(\Omega;x_1,\ldots, x_{N}; x_{N+1}, x_{N+2})$ is a polygon, i.e. $\Omega$ is a simply connected domain with locally connected boundary and $x_1,\ldots,x_{N+2}$ are $N+2$ different points located counterclockwisely on $\partial\Omega$. Fix $\kappa\in (0,4)$. In this paper, we will give two different constructions of multiple $N$-SLE$_\kappa\left(\frac{\kappa-6}{2},\frac{\kappa-6}{2}\right)$ on $(\Omega;x_1,\ldots,x_{N}; x_{N+1},x_{N+2})$ and prove that they give the same law on random curves. Then, by establishing the uniqueness of multiple $N$-SLE$_\kappa\left(\frac{\kappa-6}{2},\frac{\kappa-6}{2}\right)$, we can obtain the joint law of the hitting points of multiple $N$-SLE$_\kappa\left(\frac{\kappa-6}{2},\frac{\kappa-6}{2}\right)$ with odd (resp. even) indices on $(x_{N+1}x_{N+2})$. After shrinking $x_1,\ldots,x_N$ to one point, the law of hitting points with odd (resp. even) indices converge to $\beta$-Jacobi ensemble with the conjectured relation $\beta=\frac{8}{\kappa}$. We will establish a direct connection between SLE-type curves and $\beta$-Jacobi ensemble. As an application, we consider critical Ising model on a discrete polygon $(\Omega^\delta_\delta;x^\delta_1,\ldots,x^\delta_{N}; x^\delta_{N+1},x^\delta_{N+2})$ with alternating boundary $(x^\delta_{N+2}x^\delta_{N+1})$ and free boundary $(x^\delta_{N+1}x^\delta_{N+2})$. Motivated by the partition function of multiple $N$-SLE$_\kappa\left(\frac{\kappa-6}{2},\frac{\kappa-6}{2}\right)$, we derive the scaling limit of the probability of the event that the interface $\gamma_j^\delta$ starting from $x^\delta_j$ ends at $(x^\delta_{N+1}x^\delta_{N+2})$ for all $1\le j\le N$. Moreover, we prove that given this event, the interface $(\gamma_1^\delta,\ldots,\gamma_N^\delta)$ converges to multiple $N$-SLE$_\kappa\left(\frac{\kappa-6}{2},\frac{\kappa-6}{2}\right)$ with $\kappa=3$.
Figures
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
On the uniqueness of global multiple SLE s
Vincent Beffara, Eveliina Peltola, and Hao Wu. On the uniqueness of global multiple SLE s. Ann. Probab. , 49(1):400--434, 2021
2021
-
[2]
Stochastic loewner evolution and dyson's circular ensembles
John Cardy. Stochastic loewner evolution and dyson's circular ensembles. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , 36(24):L379, jun 2003
work page 2003
-
[3]
Convergence of I sing interfaces to S chramm's SLE curves
Dmitry Chelkak, Hugo Duminil-Copin, Cl\' e ment Hongler, Antti Kemppainen, and Stanislav Smirnov. Convergence of I sing interfaces to S chramm's SLE curves. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris , 352(2):157--161, 2014
work page 2014
-
[4]
Crossing probabilities in topological rectangles for the critical planar FK-Ising model
Dmitry Chelkak, Hugo Duminil-Copin, and Cl \'e ment Hongler. Crossing probabilities in topological rectangles for the critical planar FK-Ising model . Electronic Journal of Probability , 21(none):1 -- 28, 2016
work page 2016
-
[5]
Robust discrete complex analysis: A toolbox
Dmitry Chelkak. Robust discrete complex analysis: A toolbox. The Annals of Probability , 44(1):628--683, 2016
2016
-
[6]
Universality in the 2 D I sing model and conformal invariance of fermionic observables
Dmitry Chelkak and Stanislav Smirnov. Universality in the 2 D I sing model and conformal invariance of fermionic observables. Invent. Math. , 189(3):515--580, 2012
work page 2012
-
[7]
Commutation relations for S chramm- L oewner evolutions
Julien Dub \'e dat. Commutation relations for S chramm- L oewner evolutions. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 60(12):1792--1847, 2007
2007
-
[8]
Duality of S chramm- L oewner evolutions
Julien Dub \'e dat. Duality of S chramm- L oewner evolutions. Ann. Sci. \'Ec. Norm. Sup\'er. (4) , 42(5):697--724, 2009
work page 2009
Show all 27 references
-
[9]
Multiple SLEs for (0,8) : Coulomb gas integrals and pure partition functions
Yu Feng, Mingchang Liu, Eveliina Peltola, and Hao Wu. Multiple SLEs for (0,8) : Coulomb gas integrals and pure partition functions. Preprint in arXiv: 2406.06522, 2024
2024 arXiv
-
[10]
Connection probabilities of multiple FK-Ising interfaces
Yu Feng, Eveliina Peltola, and Hao Wu. Connection probabilities of multiple FK-Ising interfaces. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 189(1-2):281--367, March 2024
2024
-
[11]
Multiple Ising interfaces in annulus and 2N-sided radial SLE
Yu Feng, Hao Wu, and Lu Yang. Multiple Ising interfaces in annulus and 2N-sided radial SLE . Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , 2024(6):5326--5372, 2024
2024
-
[12]
Vivian Olsiewski Healey and Gregory F. Lawler. N-sided radial S chramm- L oewner evolution. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 181(1-3):451--488, 2021
2021
-
[13]
Smirnov's observable for free boundary conditions, interfaces and crossing probabilities
Konstantin Izyurov. Smirnov's observable for free boundary conditions, interfaces and crossing probabilities. Comm. Math. Phys. , 337(1):225--252, 2015
2015
-
[14]
Limits of conformal images and conformal images of limits for planar random curves, 2018
Alex Karrila. Limits of conformal images and conformal images of limits for planar random curves, 2018. arXiv:1810.05608
2018
-
[15]
Multiple SLE type scaling limits: from local to global, 2019
Alex Karrila. Multiple SLE type scaling limits: from local to global, 2019. arXiv:1903.10354
2019 arXiv
-
[16]
Matrix models for circular ensembles
Rowan Killip and Irina Nenciu. Matrix models for circular ensembles. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2004, 10 2004
2004
-
[17]
Uniform spanning tree in topological polygon, partition functions for SLE (8), and correlations in c=-2 logarithm CFT
Mingchang Liu, Eveliina Peltola, and Hao Wu. Uniform spanning tree in topological polygon, partition functions for SLE (8), and correlations in c=-2 logarithm CFT . Ann. Probab. to appear , 2024
2024
-
[18]
Lawler, Oded Schramm, and Wendelin Werner
Gregory F. Lawler, Oded Schramm, and Wendelin Werner. Conformal invariance of planar loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees. Ann. Probab. , 32(1B):939--995, 2004
2004
-
[19]
A level line of the gaussian free field with measure-valued boundary conditions
Titus Lupu and Hao Wu. A level line of the gaussian free field with measure-valued boundary conditions. Science China Mathematics , 67, 06 2021
2021
-
[20]
Imaginary geometry I : I nteracting SLE s
Jason Miller and Scott Sheffield. Imaginary geometry I : I nteracting SLE s. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 164(3-4):553--705, 2016
2016
-
[21]
Imaginary geometry II : R eversibility of SLE ( 1; 2) for (0,4)
Jason Miller and Scott Sheffield. Imaginary geometry II : R eversibility of SLE ( 1; 2) for (0,4) . Ann. Probab. , 44(3):1647--1722, 2016
2016
-
[22]
Basic properties of SLE
Steffen Rohde and Oded Schramm. Basic properties of SLE . Ann. of Math. (2) , 161(2):883--924, 2005
2005
-
[23]
Critical percolation in the plane: conformal invariance, C ardy's formula, scaling limits
Stanislav Smirnov. Critical percolation in the plane: conformal invariance, C ardy's formula, scaling limits. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S\'er. I Math. , 333(3):239--244, 2001
2001
-
[24]
Contour lines of the two-dimensional discrete G aussian free field
Oded Schramm and Scott Sheffield. Contour lines of the two-dimensional discrete G aussian free field. Acta Math. , 202(1):21--137, 2009
2009
-
[25]
Oded Schramm and David B. Wilson. S LE coordinate changes. New York J. Math. , 11:659--669 (electronic), 2005
2005
-
[26]
Time-reversal of multiple-force-point chordal
Pu Yu. Time-reversal of multiple-force-point chordal . Electronic Journal of Probability , 28(none):1 -- 19, 2023
2023
-
[27]
Existence and uniqueness of nonsimple multiple SLE
Dapeng Zhan. Existence and uniqueness of nonsimple multiple SLE . J. Stat. Phys. , 191(8):Paper No. 101, 15, 2024
2024
Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.