Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Quantum Curves in the Context of Symplectic Duality

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dualities turn quantum-curve derivation into plain substitution, so hard quantum operators follow from trivial dual curves.

desk verdict Useful tool paper: clean substitution rule for quantum curve operators under dualities, with new Gen-TR examples; main caveat is unproven existence for Log/Gen-TR. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14924 v1 pith:5IG7KARE submitted 2025-04-21 math-ph hep-thmath.AGmath.MP

Alexander Hock , Sergey Shadrin This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phhep-thmath.AGmath.MP
keywords topologicalrecursionquantumspectralcurvex-ydualitysymplecticwavefunctionLog-TRGen-TRbasepoint
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the two known duality mechanisms of topological recursion—x-y duality and the more general symplectic duality—act on quantum spectral curve operators by direct substitution: replace each operator with a specified rational expression in the dual operators, with no normal ordering. If this is right, the often laborious derivation of a quantum curve for a complicated spectral curve can be reversed: start from a dual curve whose differentials and wave function are trivial, apply the substitution rule, and read off the quantum operator that annihilates the original wave function. The paper proves the substitution rule for arbitrary base points and demonstrates it on Airy, Bessel, r-spin, q-double Hurwitz, colored HOMFLY-PT torus knot, Gaiotto, and generalized topological recursion examples, recovering known operators and producing new ones. The reason to care is that quantum curves are central to knot theory, topological string theory, and enumerative geometry, where existing derivations often require case-by-case tuning.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quantum spectral curve operator $\hat P_\hbar(\hat x,\hat y;\hat x_0,\hat y_0)$, a quantization of the polynomial relation $P(x,y)=0$ whose semiclassical limit is $P$. The paper's main tool is the operator substitution map induced by the extended Laplace transform (3.1): under x-y duality, $\hat x$ maps to $\hat y^\vee_0-\hbar/(\hat x^\vee-\hat x^\vee_0)$, $\hat y$ maps to $\hat x^\vee_0-\hbar/(\hat y^\vee-\hat y^\vee_0)$, and analogously for the base-point operators; symplectic duality is obtained by composing this map with the shift $\hat y\mapsto\hat y-R(\hat x)$ that implements $(x,y)\mapsto(x,y+R(x))$. The substitution is applied to the already-known quantum curve and, being an involution, recovers the dual curve's annihilator without re-running any recursion.

What would settle it

Compute the wave function for a Gen-TR spectral curve with the special-point set $P$ chosen away from the ramification points—for instance the $(r,s)$ example of Section 4.4.2 for $s=3$—and check order by order in $\hbar$ whether the substituted operator annihilates it; the first order at which a mismatch appears would mark the boundary of the method.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that if a quantum spectral curve operator $\hat P_\hbar(\hat x,\hat y;\hat x_0,\hat y_0)$ annihilates the wave function built from a system of differentials, then the dual operator annihilating the dual wave function is obtained by replacing $\hat x,\hat y,\hat x_0,\hat y_0$ with the expressions in (3.7), and similarly the symplectic-dual operator is obtained by the substitution in (3.10). The replacement is literal: no normal ordering is applied, so denominators such as $\hat y^\vee-\hat y^\vee_0$ may appear. The proof combines the extended Laplace transform that relates the two wave functions with the commutation relations $[\hat x^\vee,\hat y^\vee]=-\hbar$ and $[\hat x^\vee_0,\hat y^\vee_0]=\hbar$. Because the dual system is often trivial—only $\omega_{0,1}$ and $\omega_{0,2}$ contribute—the hard side's quantum curve can be obtained by dualizing a trivially quantizable curve.

Load-bearing premise

Throughout, the paper assumes that the wave function defined by (2.6) for Log-TR and Gen-TR is actually annihilated by some quantum spectral curve operator; Section 2.3 states that this existence is not yet established for these generalizations, so if it fails for a curve class, the operators derived by substitution would not be quantum curves in the intended sense.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a rational spectral curve $p(y)-q(y)x=0$ with coprime polynomials, the generic-base-point quantum curve is $p(\hat y-\hbar/(\hat x-\hat x_0))-q(\hat y-\hbar/(\hat x-\hat x_0))(\hat x-\hbar/(\hat y-\hat y_0))$; Airy, Bessel, r-spin, and negative r-spin curves are immediate special cases.
  • The Log-TR examples in Section 4.3 give quantum curves for r-spin q-double Hurwitz numbers and colored HOMFLY-PT polynomials of torus knots in a unified form, reproducing previously known operators such as the one in [MSS13, Eq. (58)] and [DBPSS19, Thm. 10.1].
  • Gen-TR produces quantum curves even when the chosen special-point set $P$ does not coincide with the critical points of $x$; the new Airy-type example has a nonzero $\hbar^2$ correction, and the $(r,s)$ curves require Galois averaging to remove fractional powers.
  • The substitution rule is an involution, so the dual of the dual quantum curve is the original operator; this gives a consistency check and a way to move between representations with different base points.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to feed admissible systems of differentials that do not come from any known version of topological recursion into the substitution rule; if the rule is as universal as Proposition 3.1 suggests, every such system would have a quantum curve whenever its dual does.
  • The appearance of denominators like $\hat y^\vee-\hat y^\vee_0$ indicates that rational expressions, not polynomials, are the natural presentation of quantum curves with arbitrary base points; insisting on polynomial form may be what made earlier derivations look non-canonical.
  • Because the argument is formal in $\hbar$, one could test the substitution rule order by order against direct WKB computation for a higher-genus curve once non-perturbative wave functions are included; a mismatch there would delimit the genus-zero scope of the method.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a systematic method to compute quantum spectral curve operators for wave functions with arbitrary base points by combining the x-y duality and symplectic duality of topological recursion with the perturbative wave function construction. After reviewing CEO-TR, Log-TR, Gen-TR, and the universal duality formulas, the authors state two substitution rules: Corollary 3.7 for the x-y duality and Proposition 3.9 for symplectic duality. These rules transfer a quantum curve from a trivial or simple dual spectral curve to the target curve, and the authors use them to rederive and simplify many known quantum curves (Airy, Bessel, r-spin, q-double Hurwitz, torus knot HOMFLY-PT, Gaiotto curve) and to propose new operators in the Log-TR and Gen-TR settings. The last section contains a Gen-TR example with P empty, including a new Airy-like quantization and a primer for (r,s)-curves.

Significance. If the substitution rules are valid, the paper provides a genuinely useful and conceptually unifying tool: it turns the hard problem of finding a quantum curve for a nontrivial spectral curve into a sequence of algebraic substitutions starting from a trivial dual family. The paper explicitly matches several previously published quantum curves, which is a real strength and gives nontrivial evidence for the method. It also clarifies the role of Log-TR and Gen-TR in quantization and identifies the open question of existence of quantum curves for general Gen-TR. The formal nature of some arguments and the incomplete verification of the new Gen-TR example, however, mean that the main claim is not yet established with full mathematical rigor. The potential payoff is high: a clean, base-point-dependent quantization algorithm with applications to Hurwitz theory, knot invariants, and W-constraints.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, Prop. 3.5] The proof of Proposition 3.5, on which Corollary 3.7 and all subsequent examples rely, is only sketched and contains a nontrivial gap. Differentiating (3.1) with respect to x gives [(ℏ∂_x − ℏ/(x−x0))ψ]/(x−x0), not (ℏ∂_x − ℏ/(x−x0)) applied to ψ/(x−x0). To pass from this to the operator substitutions (3.2)–(3.6) one must multiply by (x−x0) and use additional identities that are not written down. The sentence "Combining (3.5) with (3.3) ..." is not a derivation. Since Corollary 3.7 and all examples in Section 4 are direct consequences of this proposition, the authors should provide a complete, step-by-step proof or explicitly define the operator calculus (including the meaning of denominators such as 1/(ˆx∨−ˆx∨0)) in which the substitutions are made.
  2. [§4.1.3 (Airy example) and §4.3–4.4 (Log-TR/Gen-TR examples)] The paper asserts, but does not show, that the displayed operators annihilate the corresponding wave functions. For the Airy case this is checkable: a full WKB computation shows that the O(ℏ) contributions from (ˆy−ℏ/(x−x0))^2, the ℏ^2ψ'' correction, and the inverse operator 1/(ˆy−ˆy0) cancel exactly, so the example is consistent. The authors should include this kind of check, at least for the Airy benchmark, because it is the test of the whole substitution mechanism. For the Log-TR and Gen-TR examples, especially (4.18) and the s=2 case of §4.4.2, the operators are obtained by formal substitution or by matching a few leading terms, and the paper does not verify annihilation to all orders in ℏ. Given that §2.3.4 states that the existence of quantum curves for Gen-TR is open, these new examples should either be proved or explicitly labeled as conjectural.
  3. [§4.4.2, (r,s)-curves] The "primer" for (r,s)-curves is incomplete. The operator (4.19) is found in the limit x∨→0, and for s>1 the authors replace it by a Galois-averaged operator and then "perturbatively fix the higher order terms" without specifying the iteration or proving convergence/all-orders annihilation. For s=2 the final operator is written down after a one-step compensation, but no verification is given that it annihilates the exact wave function. Since this subsection is the main evidence that Gen-TR can produce a quantum curve when P is not the set of critical points of x, the claims here need a precise statement of what is proved and what is conjectural.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.2.4, Remark 2.14] The text contains a typo: "Get-TR" should read "Gen-TR".
  2. [§2.2.3, Eq. (2.3)] The phrase "one the right hand side" should be "on the right hand side".
  3. [§4.3.5] The sentence "which prevents a conceptual understanding of such examples within a more general framework" in Remark 4.1 is unclear; the surrounding discussion suggests the authors mean the previous derivation was computational and ad hoc, but the wording is confusing.
  4. [§3.1, proof of Prop. 3.5] Equation (3.6) contains the expression "1/(d/dy + d/dy0)", which is dimensionally inconsistent with the claimed equality "ˆx∨0 − ℏ/(ˆy∨−ˆy∨0)". This is likely a typographical issue, but it should be corrected.
  5. [§4.3.4, after Eq. (4.11)] The phrase "The final computational step follows from the identity" refers to an identity in the previous subsection; the references to equations are not always precise. Please number and refer to equations consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the dual quantum-curve substitution rules are derived from the cited x-y swap and symplectic-duality theorems and are benchmarked against independent literature, not equivalent to their inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (i) the universal x-y swap formula for admissible systems of differentials, quoted from the authors' prior published work [ABDB+25, ABDB+24d]; (ii) Proposition 3.1, which the paper itself calls 'essentially a reformulation' of the kernel-duality Theorem 2.28; (iii) Proposition 3.5 and Corollary 3.7, which convert the wave-function Laplace relation into an operator substitution rule; and (iv) Proposition 3.9 for symplectic duality. Each step is a deduction from the preceding formula, and the final quantum-curve operators are not used to define the inputs of the x-y swap or the wave function. The heavily self-cited tools are published theorems with proofs, not fitted parameters, and the paper checks the outputs against independent benchmarks: the r-spin q-orbifold and torus-knot curves are matched to [MSS13, Eq. (58)] and [DBPSS19, Thm. 10.1], the Bessel and r-spin limits reproduce [DN18b] and [BE17], and the Gaiotto curve matches [BCU24, Prop. 5.12]. These external benchmark agreements give the derived operators independent content. The paper also states its own limitations rather than hiding them: Section 2.3 says the quantum-curve construction is 'not yet established for the different types of TR generalizations', and Section 2.3.4 explicitly asks whether Gen-TR gives a quantum curve in general. Those are honest scope restrictions, not circular reductions. The skeptic's concern about the Airy benchmark and the bookkeeping in Proposition 3.5 is a mathematical-correctness issue about a sign or factor and the verification of the displayed operator, not a case of an input being renamed as a prediction; no equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical fitting occurs, so the free parameter list is empty. The main axioms are formal Gaussian integration, existence of quantum curves for Log-TR and Gen-TR, genus zero restrictions, and base point regularization limits. No new entities are invented.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Formal Gaussian integrals define the kernel duality transformation (2.12).
    The paper uses formal Gaussian integrals at each order in sqrt(ℏ) without convergence analysis; Proposition 3.1 relies on this as a proof step.
  • ad hoc to paper For Log-TR and Gen-TR, a quantum curve annihilating the perturbative wave function exists.
    Section 2.3 says the quantum curve construction is not established for TR generalizations, yet Section 4 assumes it in examples.
  • domain assumption All spectral curves in examples have genus zero and satisfy the regularity conditions required by the relevant TR version.
    Bouchard-Eynard Theorem 2.17 is stated for genus zero CEO-TR, and the paper restricts to genus zero in Section 2.3.2.
  • domain assumption Limits and regularizations at singular base points behave as in Lemma 3.8.
    Lemma 3.8 assumes z0 is a singular point of x, not a ramification point, and f analytic in a ring containing y0; these conditions are used throughout Section 4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Curves in the Context of Symplectic Duality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5IG7KARE

@misc{pith2026250414924,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Curves in the Context of Symplectic Duality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5IG7KARE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14924}
}
abstract

We discuss how to use the recent progress in understanding of the $x$-$y$ duality and symplectic duality in the theory of topological recursion and its generalizations in order to efficiently compute the quantum spectral curve operators for the wave functions with arbitrary base points. The paper also contains an overview of recent generalizations of the setup of topological recursion prompted by the progress in understanding the $x$-$y$ duality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14924 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A schematic overview of the different versions of topo￾logical recursion. The most recent extension, Gen-TR, reproduces CEO-TR, Log-TR and CN-TR in general and BE-TR under some additional assumption. 2.2.1. Irregular topological recursion. The term irregular TR refers to the behav￾ior of y around the ramification points Ram(x). We relax the condition that y is regular at the ramification points of x, now allowing y … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Universal Correlators on Exponentially Ramified Spectral Curves

    math-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Generalized topological recursion extends to spectral curves with essential singularities by replacing residues at the essential point with residues at ordinary meromorphic points.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Alexandrov, B

    A. Alexandrov, B. Bychkov, P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Kazarian, and S. Shadrin. Log topological recursion through the prism of x-y swap. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (21):13461--13487, 2024, 2312.16950 http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.16950 . doi:10.1093/imrn/rnae213

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Topological recursion, symplectic duality, and generalized fully simple maps

    A. Alexandrov, B. Bychkov, P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Kazarian, and S. Shadrin. Topological recursion, symplectic duality, and generalized fully simple maps. J. Geom. Phys. , 206:Paper No. 105329, 13, 2024, 2304.11687 http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11687 . doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2024.105329

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Symplectic duality via log topological recursion

    A. Alexandrov, B. Bychkov, P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Kazarian, and S. Shadrin. Symplectic duality via log topological recursion. Commun. Number Theory Phys. , 18(4):795--841, 2024, 2405.10720 http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10720 . doi:10.4310/cntp.241203001416

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Alexandrov, B

    A. Alexandrov, B. Bychkov, P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Kazarian, and S. Shadrin. A universal formula for the x-y swap in topological recursion, 2024, 2212.00320 http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.00320 . To appear in J. Eur. Math. Soc

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Alexandrov, B

    A. Alexandrov, B. Bychkov, P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Kazarian, and S. Shadrin. Degenerate and I rregular T opological R ecursion. Comm. Math. Phys. , 406(5):Paper No. 94, 2025, 2408.02608 http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02608 . doi:10.1007/s00220-025-05274-w

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Weighted Hurwitz numbers and topological recursion: an overview

    A. Alexandrov, G. Chapuy, B. Eynard, and J. Harnad. Weighted H urwitz numbers and topological recursion: an overview. J. Math. Phys. , 59(8):081102, 21, 2018, 1610.09408 http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.09408 . doi:10.1063/1.5013201

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Alexandrov, G

    A. Alexandrov, G. Chapuy, B. Eynard, and J. Harnad. Weighted H urwitz numbers and topological recursion. Comm. Math. Phys. , 375(1):237--305, 2020, 1806.09738 http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09738 . doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03717-0

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Ramifications of Hurwitz theory, KP integrability and quantum curves

    A. Alexandrov, D. Lewanski, and S. Shadrin. Ramifications of H urwitz theory, KP integrability and quantum curves. J. High Energy Phys. , (5):124, 2016, 1512.07026 http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07026 . doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2016)124

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Borot, V

    G. Borot, V. Bouchard, N. K. Chidambaram, R. Kramer, and S. Shadrin. Taking limits in topological recursion, 2023, 2309.01654 http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01654

    2023

  2. [10]

    Borot, V

    G. Borot, V. Bouchard, N. K. Chidambaram, T. Creutzig, and D. Noshchenko. Higher A iry structures, W algebras and topological recursion. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 296(1476):v+108, 2024, 1812.08738 http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08738 . doi:10.1090/memo/1476

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Borot, S

    G. Borot, S. Charbonnier, E. Garcia-Failde, F. Leid, and S. Shadrin. Functional relations for higher-order free cumulants, 2023, 2112.12184 http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.12184

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bouchard, N

    V. Bouchard, N. K. Chidambaram, A. Giacchetto, and S. Shadrin. Top degrees of C hiodo classes, generalized topological recursion, and W -constraints, 2025. In preparation

    2025

  5. [13]

    Borot, N

    G. Borot, N. K. Chidambaram, and G. Umer. Whittaker vectors at finite energy scale, topological recursion and hurwitz numbers, 2024, 2403.16938 http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16938

    2024

  6. [14]

    Bychkov, P

    B. Bychkov, P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Kazarian, and S. Shadrin. Topological recursion for K adomtsev- P etviashvili tau functions of hypergeometric type. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) , 109(6):Paper No. e12946, 57, 2024, 2012.14723 http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.14723 . doi:10.1112/jlms.12946

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Bychkov, P

    B. Bychkov, P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Kazarian, and S. Shadrin. Symplectic duality for topological recursion. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 378(2):1001--1054, 2025, 2206.14792 http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14792 . doi:10.1090/tran/9352

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Bergère and B

    M. Bergère and B. Eynard. Determinantal formulae and loop equations, 2009, 0901.3273 http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.3273

    2009 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Bouchard and B

    V. Bouchard and B. Eynard. Think globally, compute locally. J. High Energy Phys. , (2):143, 2013, 1211.2302 http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.2302 . doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)143

    2013 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bouchard and B

    V. Bouchard and B. Eynard. Reconstructing WKB from topological recursion. J. \' E c. polytech. Math. , 4:845--908, 2017, 1606.04498 http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.04498 . doi:10.5802/jep.58

    2017 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Brini, B

    A. Brini, B. Eynard, and M. Mari\ n o. Torus knots and mirror symmetry. Ann. Henri Poincar\' e , 13(8):1873--1910, 2012, 1105.2012 http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2012 . doi:10.1007/s00023-012-0171-2

    1910 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Bouchard, A

    V. Bouchard, A. Klemm, M. Mari\ n o, and S. Pasquetti. Remodeling the B -model. Comm. Math. Phys. , 287(1):117--178, 2009, 0709.1453 http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.1453 . doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0620-4

    2009 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bouchard and P

    V. Bouchard and P. Su kowski. Topological recursion and mirror curves. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 16(5):1443--1483, 2012, 1105.2052 http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2052 . doi:10.4310/atmp.2012.v16.n5.a3

    2012 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Chekhov and B

    L. Chekhov and B. Eynard. Matrix eigenvalue model: F eynman graph technique for all genera. J. High Energy Phys. , (12):026, 29, 2006, math-ph/0604014 http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0604014 . doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/12/026

    2006 arXiv

  15. [23]

    N. K. Chidambaram, E. Garcia-Failde, and A. Giacchetto. Relations on M _ g,n and the negative r -spin W itten conjecture, 2023, 2205.15621 http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15621

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    L. Chen. Bouchard- K lemm- M arino- P asquetti conjecture for C ^3 . In Topological recursion and its influence in analysis, geometry, and topology , volume 100 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , pages 83--102. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2018, 0910.3739 http://arxiv.org/abs/...

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Chekhov and P

    L. Chekhov and P. Norbury. Topological recursion with hard edges. Internat. J. Math. , 30(3):1950014, 29, 2019, 1702.08631 http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08631 . doi:10.1142/S0129167X19500149

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Dunin-Barkowski, M

    P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Kazarian, A. Popolitov, S. Shadrin, and A. Sleptsov. Topological recursion for the extended O oguri- V afa partition function of colored HOMFLY - PT polynomials of torus knots. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 26(4):793--833, 2022, 2010.11021 http://arxiv.org/a...

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Dunin-Barkowski, R

    P. Dunin-Barkowski, R. Kramer, A. Popolitov, and S. Shadrin. Loop equations and a proof of Z vonkine's qr - ELSV formula. Ann. Sci. \' E c. Norm. Sup\' e r. (4) , 56(4):1199--1229, 2023, 1905.04524 http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.04524 . doi:10.24033/asens.2553

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Dunin-Barkowski, M

    P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Mulase, P. Norbury, A. Popolitov, and S. Shadrin. Quantum spectral curve for the G romov- W itten theory of the complex projective line. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 726:267--289, 2017, 1312.5336 http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5336 . doi:10.1515/crelle-2014-0097

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Dunin-Barkowski, A

    P. Dunin-Barkowski, A. Popolitov, S. Shadrin, and A. Sleptsov. Combinatorial structure of colored HOMFLY - PT polynomials for torus knots. Commun. Number Theory Phys. , 13(4):763--826, 2019, 1712.08614 http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.08614 . doi:10.4310/cntp.2019.v13.n4.a3

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    N. Do, A. Dyer, and D. V. Mathews. Topological recursion and a quantum curve for monotone H urwitz numbers. J. Geom. Phys. , 120:19--36, 2017, 1408.3992 http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.3992 . doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2017.05.014

    2017 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Do and P

    N. Do and P. Norbury. Topological recursion for irregular spectral curves. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) , 97(3):398--426, 2018, 1412.8334 http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.8334 . doi:10.1112/jlms.12112

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Do and P

    N. Do and P. Norbury. Topological recursion on the B essel curve. Commun. Number Theory Phys. , 12(1):53--73, 2018, 1608.02781 http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.02781 . doi:10.4310/CNTP.2018.v12.n1.a2

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Eynard and E

    B. Eynard and E. Garcia-Failde. From topological recursion to wave functions and PDE s quantizing hyperelliptic curves. Forum Math. Sigma , 11:Paper No. e99, 42, 2023, 1911.07795 http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.07795 . doi:10.1017/fms.2023.96

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Eynard, E

    B. Eynard, E. Garcia-Failde, O. Marchal, and N. Orantin. Quantization of classical spectral curves via topological recursion. Comm. Math. Phys. , 405(5):Paper No. 116, 118, 2024, 2106.04339 http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04339 . doi:10.1007/s00220-024-04997-6

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Eynard and N

    B. Eynard and N. Orantin. Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion. Commun. Number Theory Phys. , 1(2):347--452, 2007, math-ph/0702045 http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0702045 . doi:10.4310/CNTP.2007.v1.n2.a4

    2007 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Eynard and N

    B. Eynard and N. Orantin. Computation of open G romov- W itten invariants for toric C alabi- Y au 3-folds by topological recursion, a proof of the BKMP conjecture. Comm. Math. Phys. , 337(2):483--567, 2015, 1205.1103 http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.1103 . doi:10.1007/s00220-015-2361-5

    2015 arXiv

  29. [37]

    B. Eynard. The geometry of integrable systems. tau functions and homology of spectral curves. perturbative definition, 2019, 1706.04938 http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.04938

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Fang, C.-C

    B. Fang, C.-C. M. Liu, and Z. Zong. On the remodeling conjecture for toric C alabi- Y au 3-orbifolds. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 33(1):135--222, 2020, 1604.07123 http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07123 . doi:10.1090/jams/934

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Gukov and P

    S. Gukov and P. Su kowski. A-polynomial, B -model, and quantization. J. High Energy Phys. , (2):070, 2012, 1108.0002 http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0002 . doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2012)070

    2012 arXiv

  32. [40]

    A. Hock. Laplace transform of the x - y symplectic transformation formula in topological recursion. Commun. Number Theory Phys. , 17(4):821--845, 2023, 2304.03032 http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03032 . doi:10.4310/cntp.2023.v17.n4.a1

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    A. Hock. A simple formula for the x - y symplectic transformation in topological recursion. J. Geom. Phys. , 194:Paper No. 105027, 26, 2023, 2211.08917 http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08917 . doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2023.105027

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    A. Hock. On the x - y symmetry of correlators in topological recursion via loop insertion operator. Comm. Math. Phys. , 405(7):Paper No. 166, 25, 2024, 2201.05357 http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.05357 . doi:10.1007/s00220-024-05043-1

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    A. Hock. x - y duality in topological recursion for exponential variables via quantum dilogarithm. SciPost Phys. , 17(2):Paper No. 065, 36, 2024, 2311.11761 http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11761 . doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.2.065

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    K. Iwaki. 2-parameter -function for the first P ainlev\' e equation: topological recursion and direct monodromy problem via exact WKB analysis. Comm. Math. Phys. , 377(2):1047--1098, 2020, 1902.06439 http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.06439 . doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03769-2

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Marchal and N

    O. Marchal and N. Orantin. Quantization of hyper-elliptic curves from isomonodromic systems and topological recursion. J. Geom. Phys. , 171:Paper No. 104407, 44, 2022, 1911.07739 http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.07739 . doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104407

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Mulase and P

    M. Mulase and P. Su kowski. Spectral curves and the S chr\" o dinger equations for the E ynard- O rantin recursion. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 19(5):955--1015, 2015, 1210.3006 http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.3006 . doi:10.4310/ATMP.2015.v19.n5.a2

    2015 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Mulase, S

    M. Mulase, S. Shadrin, and L. Spitz. The spectral curve and the S chr\" o dinger equation of double H urwitz numbers and higher spin structures. Commun. Number Theory Phys. , 7(1):125--143, 2013, 1301.5580 http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.5580 . doi:10.4310/CNTP.2013.v7.n1.a4

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    P. Norbury. A new cohomology class on the moduli space of curves. Geom. Topol. , 27(7):2695--2761, 2023, 1712.03662 http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03662 . doi:10.2140/gt.2023.27.2695

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Q. Weller. The L aplace transform and quantum curves, 2024, 2406.17081 http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17081

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    J. Zhou. Local mirror symmetry for one-legged topological vertex, 2009, 0910.4320 http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.4320

    2009 arXiv

  43. [51]

    J. Zhou. Quantum mirror curves for C ^3 and the resolved confiold, 2012, 1207.0598 http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0598

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.