Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 75 references

NTIRE 2025 Challenge on Short-form UGC Video Quality Assessment and Enhancement: KwaiSR Dataset and Study

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read KwaiSR: the first benchmark for super-resolving short-form UGC images, and current methods fail it

desk verdict KwaiSR is a genuinely useful new dataset for short-form UGC super-resolution, but the paper's main validity gap is an undescribed synthetic degradation pipeline that needs to be fixed before the 'in the wild' claim holds. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15003 v1 pith:CEIKYGAA submitted 2025-04-21 cs.CV

Xin Li , Xijun Wang , Bingchen Li , Kun Yuan , Yizhen Shao , Suhang Yao , Ming Sun , Chao Zhou
show 2 more authors
Radu Timofte Zhibo Chen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords imagesuper-resolutionshort-formUGCbenchmarkdatasetKwaiSRno-referencequalityassessmentdiffusionmodelsNTIREchallengereal-worlddegradation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces KwaiSR, the first benchmark dataset built specifically for image super-resolution on short-form user-generated content (UGC) from a real video platform. It contains 1,800 synthetic low-resolution/high-resolution image pairs designed to mimic real short-form UGC degradation, plus 1,900 wild low-quality images directly collected from the Kwai platform and filtered by the KVQ quality assessment method. The dataset is used to run the NTIRE 2025 challenge track on short-form UGC image enhancement, and the challenge results show that existing image super-resolution methods, including diffusion-based ones, do not reliably deliver good perceptual quality on this content. The paper further reports that objective metrics disagree with human preference on this data. If correct, KwaiSR gives the community a shared resource for developing and measuring super-resolution algorithms tailored to the distortions found on short-form video platforms.

What carries the argument

The central object is the KwaiSR dataset itself: 1,800 synthetic low-resolution/high-resolution pairs plus 1,900 wild low-quality images from the Kwai platform, spanning eleven semantic categories (mountain, night, water, field, food, caption, person, portrait, crowd, CG, and stage). The synthetic pairs are intended to supply paired ground truth for training and objective comparison, while the wild images provide an unpaired, in-the-wild test set; both are split 8:1:1 into training, validation, and testing. The dataset is the load-bearing mechanism because every experimental finding in the paper—that existing methods struggle, that diffusion methods trade fidelity for realism, and that objective metrics misjudge subjective quality—is derived from running existing super-resolution models on these images.

What would settle it

Estimate the degradation parameters (blur kernel, noise level, compression strength) from the wild KwaiSR images and compare them with the synthetic low-resolution images; if the estimated distributions differ substantially, the synthetic pairs do not represent real short-form UGC degradation and results on them may not transfer to the wild setting.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that KwaiSR is the first benchmark dataset for short-form UGC image super-resolution in the wild, and that this dataset is genuinely hard for current super-resolution methods. The synthetic subset pairs 1,800 low-resolution images with ground-truth 1920×1080 high-resolution images using a simulated degradation that is said to follow the real distribution of low-quality short-form UGC images; the wild subset contains 1,900 low-quality images filtered by the KVQ quality metric. On the synthetic subset, methods must perform 4x super-resolution, while wild images are evaluated at native resolution. Results from the NTIRE 2025 challenge on this dataset show three things: a realism-versus-perceptual-quality trade-off that no method resolves cleanly, failure of no-reference metrics such as MUSIQ, CLIPIQA, and MANIQA to match user experience, and limited effectiveness of existing diffusion-based restoration methods on this content.

Load-bearing premise

The synthetic low-resolution images are assumed to reproduce the real degradation distribution of short-form UGC images, but the paper never states the degradation model, its parameters, or how that distribution was estimated or validated against the wild images.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Existing image super-resolution methods trained on conventional datasets perform noticeably worse on KwaiSR, so new methods will need to handle the specific degradations of short-form UGC content.
  • The challenge results show a persistent trade-off between realism and perceptual quality: methods that improve fidelity tend to deform faces, while methods that boost perceptual scores generate unreal, AI-style textures.
  • No-reference quality metrics such as MUSIQ, CLIPIQA, and MANIQA do not align with human preference on this dataset, indicating that progress on this task will require a better quality assessment method.
  • The synthetic/wild split lets researchers evaluate both paired fidelity (on synthetic data) and generalization to genuine in-the-wild images (on wild data), a combination that previous SR datasets did not offer.
  • One-step diffusion models such as OSEDiff achieve strong perceptual scores on the wild subset despite lower PSNR and SSIM, suggesting that sampling efficiency does not necessarily hurt perceptual quality on this domain.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper never specifies the synthetic degradation model or its parameter values, so a reader cannot yet judge whether the synthetic pairs really match the degradation distribution of wild short-form UGC images; a validation study comparing estimated degradation parameters or human paired comparisons between synthetic and wild low-resolution images would test this directly.
  • Because the challenge's objective metric ranking disagreed with the user study, the reported team rankings may themselves be an artifact of the chosen composite score; re-ranking the teams by human preference alone could give a different picture of which methods actually work.
  • The dataset could plausibly serve as a frame-level resource for short-form UGC video super-resolution, but the paper does not address temporal consistency, so treating it as a video benchmark would be an extension rather than a claim of the paper.
  • The night and stage categories are underrepresented in the synthetic subset, which may bias results toward the more common categories; future dataset versions could deliberately balance or augment these difficult scenarios.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces KwaiSR, a benchmark dataset for short-form UGC image super-resolution, collected from the Kwai platform and comprising 1,800 synthetic LR-HR pairs (or 1,900, per the abstract) and 1,900 wild low-quality images without ground truth. The authors describe the semantic category distribution, report KVQ-based quality analysis, and present the results of the NTIRE 2025 challenge track in which nine teams submitted results evaluated on synthetic and wild splits using fidelity and no-reference perceptual metrics. The central claim is that KwaiSR is the first benchmark dataset for short-form UGC image super-resolution 'in the wild' and that existing SR methods find it challenging.

Significance. If the dataset is appropriately validated and documented, KwaiSR fills a concrete gap: existing SR benchmarks are either synthetic with simple degradations or real-world without ground truth, and no dataset targets the specific characteristics of short-form UGC platforms. The paper's strengths include the real-world collection from the Kwai platform, the inclusion of eleven semantic categories, the public challenge organization with nine participating teams, and the quantitative comparison of nine recent SR methods on both synthetic and wild splits. The dataset release is likely to be useful to the community regardless of the outcome of the challenge. However, the significance is currently tempered by a lack of specification of the synthetic degradation pipeline and by the partly circular quality analysis, both of which bear directly on the 'in the wild' claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1] The dataset size is stated inconsistently. The abstract says the synthetic dataset includes '1,900 image pairs', while Section 1 says 'resulting in 1800 image pairs'; Section 4.1 then says the benchmark includes '360 synthetic image pairs and 380 low-quality wild images'. Please clarify which numbers are correct and whether Section 4.1 refers only to the validation and test subsets, since the figures in Section 3 show 1,440/180/180 synthetic and 1,520/190/190 wild splits.
  2. [Section 1 and Section 3.2] The central claim that the synthetic subset is 'produced by simulating the degradation following the distribution of real-world low-quality short-form UGC images' is never substantiated. The degradation model, its parameter values or ranges, and the procedure used to estimate the distribution from real UGC images are not described, and no comparison is made between the degradation characteristics of the synthetic LR images and the wild LR images. Since the synthetic pairs are the only ground-truth data used for training and for the objective comparisons in Tables 1 and 2, the 'in the wild' validity of the benchmark currently rests on an unstated assumption. Please provide the degradation specification and a direct comparison or a cross-domain experiment (e.g., training on the synthetic split and evaluating on the wild split).
  3. [Section 3.2 and Figure 5] The quality analysis is partly circular. The wild images were selected by filtering with KVQ, and Figure 5 then reports the KVQ score distribution of those selected images; this confirms the filter's behavior but does not validate that the selected images reflect the quality distribution of short-form UGC images on the platform or that KVQ scores correspond to human perception. The claim that 'the overall distribution of images aligns with that observed on the Kwai Platform' is made without supporting evidence. Please provide human ratings on a sample of the selected and unselected images, or a comparison with the distribution before filtering.
  4. [Section 3.3] The conclusion that 'existing metrics are not accurate to measure the human perception quality in this dataset' is supported only by a brief mention of a user study with no described protocol. The number of participants, rating scale, stimulus presentation method, and significance testing are not reported, and no statistics are given for the claim that the top-ranked objective team 'did not deliver the best user experience'. As written, this is an unsupported claim that nevertheless appears as a headline conclusion of the challenge analysis.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the synthetic dataset includes '1,900 image pairs' while the body of the paper consistently uses 1,800; please make the counts consistent throughout.
  2. [Section 4.1] Please state explicitly that the '360 synthetic image pairs and 380 low-quality wild images' are the validation and test subsets only, to avoid confusion with the full dataset sizes of 1,800 and 1,900.
  3. [Section 4.2] In the Qualitative Comparison paragraph, the text says 'in Figures 1 and 2' but the referenced qualitative figures are Figures 6 and 7; please correct the cross-reference.
  4. [Figure 6] The caption labels two panels as '(f) OSEDiff'; the sixth panel should be labeled '(g)'.
  5. [Section 2.2] The description of HAT as one that 'outperforms state-of-the-art methods in multiple tasks' is vague; please specify the comparison or remove the unspecific claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Wild-subset quality analysis is partly definitional: the KVQ scores used to select the images are then reported as evidence of their low quality.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.2 (Quality Analysis); selection criterion stated in Abstract and Section 1.]
    "The wild dataset contains low-quality images collected directly from the Kwai Platform, which are filtered using the quality assessment method KVQ from the Kwai Platform. ... As shown in Fig. 5, it is evident that the perception scores of low-quality images are fairly consistent across the range of [2.0−5.0]."

    The wild subset is constructed by applying the KVQ filter to select low-quality images, so reporting the KVQ distribution of that same subset is not independent evidence that it consists of low-quality images. The conclusion that the dataset is 'practical and highly relevant' (Section 3.2) is supported by a histogram of the very scores used as the selection criterion; the observed low scores are guaranteed by the selection rule, not discovered. Non-circular validation would require human ratings or a quality metric not used in the filter. This circularity affects only the quality-distribution analysis, not the central benchmark construction.

full rationale

The paper builds a new dataset and organizes a challenge; it derives no equations and fits no parameters to make quantitative predictions, so the main circularity traps do not apply. The only step that reduces by construction is in Section 3.2: the wild subset is filtered by KVQ scores, and the paper then presents the KVQ score distribution of that filtered subset as evidence that the dataset is 'practical and highly relevant.' This is a definitional artifact of the selection filter rather than an independent empirical finding. The synthetic degradation model is asserted as matching real UGC degradation but is never specified or validated; that is a transparency and correctness risk, not a circularity, because the synthetic pairs are an input to the benchmark rather than a quantity derived from the paper's own outputs. The central contribution, the KwaiSR dataset and the challenge results, does not depend on the tautological quality plot, so the overall circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central benchmark depends on implicit choices: the synthetic degradation pipeline parameters, the KVQ filtering threshold for wild images, and assumptions that Kwai content is representative of short-form UGC and that KVQ scores are a valid proxy for low quality. These are not reported as explicit fitted numbers, so they appear here as unstated free choices and domain assumptions. No invented physical or conceptual entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Synthetic degradation model parameters
    The paper states the synthetic pairs are produced by simulating degradation following the distribution of real-world short-form UGC images (Sec. 1), but gives no degradation model, kernel, noise, or compression parameter values. These unreported choices determine whether the synthetic benchmark is representative.
  • KVQ filtering threshold for wild images
    Wild images are selected by the KVQ metric from the Kwai platform (Sec. 1), but the inclusion threshold or score range used to filter 'low-quality' images is not specified. This threshold determines the content and difficulty of the wild set.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Synthetic degradation generated in this work matches the distribution of real-world short-form UGC degradation.
    Sec. 1 states the synthetic pairs simulate degradation of real short-form UGC images, but no degradation model, parameters, or validation is given.
  • domain assumption KVQ quality scores reliably identify low-quality wild images.
    Wild images are filtered by KVQ from the Kwai platform (Sec. 1); KVQ comes from prior work with overlapping authors [36], and no human validation is reported.
  • domain assumption Kwai platform images are representative of short-form UGC platforms generally.
    The benchmark's motivating use case is short-form UGC platforms, but only Kwai images are used (Sec. 1), so representativeness to other platforms is assumed.
  • domain assumption The objective metrics used (PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, MUSIQ, CLIPIQA, MANIQA) are meaningful measures of quality, except where the paper argues they fail.
    Tables 1-4 use these metrics for ranking; the later claim of metric failure is based on a user study summarized without data (Sec. 3.3).
  • domain assumption An 8:1:1 random split preserves the semantics and degradation distributions.
    The paper asserts training, validation, and testing share the same semantic distribution (Sec. 3.1, Figs. 3-4) and relies on this for benchmark validity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of NTIRE 2025 Challenge on Short-form UGC Video Quality Assessment and Enhancement: KwaiSR Dataset and Study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CEIKYGAA

@misc{pith2026250415003,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: NTIRE 2025 Challenge on Short-form UGC Video Quality Assessment and Enhancement: KwaiSR Dataset and Study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CEIKYGAA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15003}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, we build the first benchmark dataset for short-form UGC Image Super-resolution in the wild, termed KwaiSR, intending to advance the research on developing image super-resolution algorithms for short-form UGC platforms. This dataset is collected from the Kwai Platform, which is composed of two parts, i.e., synthetic and wild parts. Among them, the synthetic dataset, including 1,900 image pairs, is produced by simulating the degradation following the distribution of real-world low-quality short-form UGC images, aiming to provide the ground truth for training and objective comparison in the validation/testing. The wild dataset contains low-quality images collected directly from the Kwai Platform, which are filtered using the quality assessment method KVQ from the Kwai Platform. As a result, the KwaiSR dataset contains 1800 synthetic image pairs and 1900 wild images, which are divided into training, validation, and testing parts with a ratio of 8:1:1. Based on the KwaiSR dataset, we organize the NTIRE 2025 challenge on a second short-form UGC Video quality assessment and enhancement, which attracts lots of researchers to develop the algorithm for it. The results of this competition have revealed that our KwaiSR dataset is pretty challenging for existing Image SR methods, which is expected to lead to a new direction in the image super-resolution field. The dataset can be found from https://lixinustc.github.io/NTIRE2025-KVQE-KwaSR-KVQ.github.io/.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.15003 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The visualization of our proposed KwaiSR dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The eleven semantic categories of the KwaiSR dataset. The left/right images are LR/HR, respectively. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The semantic categories and their corresponding image counts for synthetic datasets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The semantic categories and their corresponding image counts for wild datasets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The KVQ Score distribution of different semantic cate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison with different methods. These three rows of images are sourced from the synthetic test set, synthetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative comparison with different methods. These two rows of images are sourced from the wild test set and wild validation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study

    Eirikur Agustsson and Radu Timofte. Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study. In The IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR) Work- shops, 2017. 3

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Low-complexity single-image super-resolution based on nonnegative neighbor embedding

    Marco Bevilacqua, Aline Roumy, Christine Guillemot, and Marie Line Alberi-Morel. Low-complexity single-image super-resolution based on nonnegative neighbor embedding. BMVA press, 2012. 3

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    The 2018 pirm challenge on percep- tual image super-resolution

    Yochai Blau, Roey Mechrez, Radu Timofte, Tomer Michaeli, and Lihi Zelnik-Manor. The 2018 pirm challenge on percep- tual image super-resolution. In Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis. Workshops, pages 0–0, 2018. 2

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Toward real-world single image super-resolution: A new benchmark and a new model

    Jianrui Cai, Hui Zeng, Hongwei Yong, Zisheng Cao, and Lei Zhang. Toward real-world single image super-resolution: A new benchmark and a new model. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 3086–3095, 2019. 3

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Adversarial diffusion compression for real-world image super-resolution

    Bin Chen, Gehui Li, Rongyuan Wu, Xindong Zhang, Jie Chen, Jian Zhang, and Lei Zhang. Adversarial diffusion compression for real-world image super-resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13383, 2024. 3

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Activat- ing more pixels in image super-resolution transformer

    X Chen, X Wang, J Zhou, and C Dong. Activat- ing more pixels in image super-resolution transformer. arXiv:2205.04437. 2

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Activating more pixels in image super- resolution transformer

    Xiangyu Chen, Xintao Wang, Jiantao Zhou, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Activating more pixels in image super- resolution transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 22367–22377, 2023. 2, 3, 5, 6

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Cross aggregation transformer for image restora- tion

    Zheng Chen, Yulun Zhang, Jinjin Gu, Linghe Kong, Xin Yuan, et al. Cross aggregation transformer for image restora- tion. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 35:25478–25490, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Second-order attention network for single im- age super-resolution

    Tao Dai, Jianrui Cai, Yongbing Zhang, Shu-Tao Xia, and Lei Zhang. Second-order attention network for single im- age super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 11065–11074, 2019. 3

    2019

  2. [10]

    Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution

    Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part IV 13 , pages 184–199. Springer,

    2014

  3. [11]

    Mamba-based light field super-resolution with efficient subspace scanning

    Ruisheng Gao, Zeyu Xiao, and Zhiwei Xiong. Mamba-based light field super-resolution with efficient subspace scanning. In Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pages 531–547, 2024. 2

    2024

  4. [12]

    Multi-scale deep neural networks for real image super-resolution

    Shangqi Gao and Xiahai Zhuang. Multi-scale deep neural networks for real image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 0–0, 2019. 3

    2019

  5. [13]

    Mambairv2: Attentive state space restoration

    Hang Guo, Yong Guo, Yaohua Zha, Yulun Zhang, Wenbo Li, Tao Dai, Shu-Tao Xia, and Yawei Li. Mambairv2: Attentive state space restoration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15269 ,

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Mambair: A simple baseline for image restoration with state-space model

    Hang Guo, Jinmin Li, Tao Dai, Zhihao Ouyang, Xudong Ren, and Shu-Tao Xia. Mambair: A simple baseline for image restoration with state-space model. In European con- ference on computer vision, pages 222–241. Springer, 2024. 2

    2024

  7. [15]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 33:6840–6851, 2020. 3

    2020

  8. [16]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen- Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, Weizhu Chen, et al. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. ICLR, 1(2):3, 2022. 2

    2022

  9. [17]

    Single image super-resolution from transformed self-exemplars

    Jia-Bin Huang, Abhishek Singh, and Narendra Ahuja. Single image super-resolution from transformed self-exemplars. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5197–5206, 2015. 3

    2015

  10. [18]

    Musiq: Multi-scale image quality transformer

    Junjie Ke, Qifei Wang, Yilin Wang, Peyman Milanfar, and Feng Yang. Musiq: Multi-scale image quality transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 5148–5157, 2021. 6

    2021

  11. [19]

    Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional net- works

    Jiwon Kim, Jung Kwon Lee, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional net- works. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. workshops, pages 1646–1654, 2016. 2

    2016

  12. [20]

    Dvmsr: Distillated vision mamba for efficient super-resolution

    Xiaoyan Lei, Wenlong Zhang, and Weifeng Cao. Dvmsr: Distillated vision mamba for efficient super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition, pages 6536–6546, 2024. 2

    2024

  13. [21]

    Hst: Hierarchical swin transformer for com- pressed image super-resolution

    Bingchen Li, Xin Li, Yiting Lu, Sen Liu, Ruoyu Feng, and Zhibo Chen. Hst: Hierarchical swin transformer for com- pressed image super-resolution. In European conference on computer vision, pages 651–668. Springer, 2022. 3

    2022

  14. [22]

    Lossagent: Towards any optimization objectives for image processing with llm agents

    Bingchen Li, Xin Li, Yiting Lu, and Zhibo Chen. Lossagent: Towards any optimization objectives for image processing with llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04090, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Sed: Semantic-aware discriminator for image super-resolution

    Bingchen Li, Xin Li, Hanxin Zhu, Yeying Jin, Ruoyu Feng, Zhizheng Zhang, and Zhibo Chen. Sed: Semantic-aware discriminator for image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 25784–25795, 2024. 2

    2024

  16. [24]

    Multi-scale residual network for image super-resolution

    Juncheng Li, Faming Fang, Kangfu Mei, and Guixu Zhang. Multi-scale residual network for image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 517–532, 2018. 3

    2018

  17. [25]

    Learning disentangled fea- ture representation for hybrid-distorted image restoration

    Xin Li, Xin Jin, Jianxin Lin, Sen Liu, Yaojun Wu, Tao Yu, Wei Zhou, and Zhibo Chen. Learning disentangled fea- ture representation for hybrid-distorted image restoration. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part...

    2020

  18. [26]

    Diffusion models for image restoration and enhancement–a compre- hensive survey

    Xin Li, Yulin Ren, Xin Jin, Cuiling Lan, Xingrui Wang, Wenjun Zeng, Xinchao Wang, and Zhibo Chen. Diffusion models for image restoration and enhancement–a compre- hensive survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09388, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  19. [27]

    Ucip: A universal frame- work for compressed image super-resolution using dynamic prompt

    Xin Li, Bingchen Li, Yeying Jin, Cuiling Lan, Hanxin Zhu, Yulin Ren, and Zhibo Chen. Ucip: A universal frame- work for compressed image super-resolution using dynamic prompt. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 107–125. Springer, 2024. 2

    2024

  20. [28]

    Ntire 2024 challenge on short-form ugc video qual- ity assessment: Methods and results

    Xin Li, Kun Yuan, Yajing Pei, Yiting Lu, Ming Sun, Chao Zhou, Zhibo Chen, Radu Timofte, Wei Sun, Haoning Wu, et al. Ntire 2024 challenge on short-form ugc video qual- ity assessment: Methods and results. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern ...

    2024

  21. [29]

    NTIRE 2025 challenge on short-form ugc video quality assessment and enhancement: Methods and results

    Xin Li, Kun Yuan, Bingchen Li, Fengbin Guan, Yizhen Shao, Zihao Yu, Xijun Wang, Yiting Lu, Wei Luo, Suhang Yao, Ming Sun, Chao Zhou, Zhibo Chen, Radu Timofte, et al. NTIRE 2025 challenge on short-form ugc video quality assessment and enhancement: Methods and results. In Pro- c...

    2025

  22. [30]

    Lsdir: A large scale dataset for image restora- tion

    Yawei Li, Kai Zhang, Jingyun Liang, Jiezhang Cao, Ce Liu, Rui Gong, Yulun Zhang, Hao Tang, Yun Liu, Denis Deman- dolx, et al. Lsdir: A large scale dataset for image restora- tion. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., pages 1775–1787, 2023. 3

    2023

  23. [31]

    Swinir: Image restoration us- ing swin transformer

    Jingyun Liang, Jiezhang Cao, Guolei Sun, Kai Zhang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Swinir: Image restoration us- ing swin transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF inter- national conference on computer vision , pages 1833–1844,

  24. [32]

    Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution

    Bee Lim, Sanghyun Son, Heewon Kim, Seungjun Nah, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE confer- ence on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 136–144, 2017. 2, 3

    2017

  25. [33]

    Diff- bir: Toward blind image restoration with generative diffusion prior

    Xinqi Lin, Jingwen He, Ziyan Chen, Zhaoyang Lyu, Bo Dai, Fanghua Yu, Yu Qiao, Wanli Ouyang, and Chao Dong. Diff- bir: Toward blind image restoration with generative diffusion prior. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 430–448. Springer, 2024. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8

    2024

  26. [34]

    Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows

    Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Baining Guo. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. , pages 10012–10022,

  27. [35]

    Aigc- vqa: A holistic perception metric for aigc video quality assessment

    Yiting Lu, Xin Li, Bingchen Li, Zihao Yu, Fengbin Guan, Xinrui Wang, Ruling Liao, Yan Ye, and Zhibo Chen. Aigc- vqa: A holistic perception metric for aigc video quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 638...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Kvq: Kwai video quality assessment for short-form videos

    Yiting Lu, Xin Li, Yajing Pei, Kun Yuan, Qizhi Xie, Yunpeng Qu, Ming Sun, Chao Zhou, and Zhibo Chen. Kvq: Kwai video quality assessment for short-form videos. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 25963–25973, 2024. 2

    2024

  29. [37]

    Efficient transformer for single image super-resolution

    Zhisheng Lu, Hong Liu, Juncheng Li, and Linlin Zhang. Efficient transformer for single image super-resolution. arXiv:2108.11084, 2021. 2

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Transformer for single image super-resolution

    Zhisheng Lu, Juncheng Li, Hong Liu, Chaoyan Huang, Lin- lin Zhang, and Tieyong Zeng. Transformer for single image super-resolution. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., pages 457–466, 2022. 2

    2022

  31. [39]

    A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics

    David Martin, Charless Fowlkes, Doron Tal, and Jitendra Malik. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IC...

    2001

  32. [40]

    Sketch-based manga retrieval using manga109 dataset

    Yusuke Matsui, Kota Ito, Yuji Aramaki, Azuma Fujimoto, Toru Ogawa, Toshihiko Yamasaki, and Kiyoharu Aizawa. Sketch-based manga retrieval using manga109 dataset. Mul- timedia Tools and Applications, 76(20):21811–21838, 2017. 3

    2017

  33. [41]

    Xpsr: Cross-modal priors for diffusion-based image super-resolution

    Yunpeng Qu, Kun Yuan, Kai Zhao, Qizhi Xie, Jinhua Hao, Ming Sun, and Chao Zhou. Xpsr: Cross-modal priors for diffusion-based image super-resolution. ECVA, 2024. 2

    2024

  34. [42]

    Mambacsr: Dual-interleaved scanning for compressed image super-resolution with ssms

    Yulin Ren, Xin Li, Mengxi Guo, Bingchen Li, Shijie Zhao, and Zhibo Chen. Mambacsr: Dual-interleaved scanning for compressed image super-resolution with ssms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11758, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Moe-diffir: Task-customized diffusion priors for universal compressed image restoration

    Yulin Ren, Xin Li, Bingchen Li, Xingrui Wang, Mengxi Guo, Shijie Zhao, Li Zhang, and Zhibo Chen. Moe-diffir: Task-customized diffusion priors for universal compressed image restoration. In European Conference on Computer Vi- sion, pages 116–134. Springer, 2024. 2

    2024

  36. [44]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models for robust image super-resolution in the wild

    Hshmat Sahak, Daniel Watson, Chitwan Saharia, and David Fleet. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models for robust image super-resolution in the wild. arXiv:2302.07864, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Methods and results

    Radu Timofte, Eirikur Agustsson, Luc Van Gool, Ming- Hsuan Yang, and Lei Zhang. Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Methods and results. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 114–125, 2017. 3

    2017

  38. [46]

    Maxim: Multi-axis mlp for image processing

    Zhengzhong Tu, Hossein Talebi, Han Zhang, Feng Yang, Peyman Milanfar, Alan Bovik, and Yinxiao Li. Maxim: Multi-axis mlp for image processing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5769–5780, 2022. 2

    2022

  39. [47]

    Ex- ploring clip for assessing the look and feel of images

    Jianyi Wang, Kelvin CK Chan, and Chen Change Loy. Ex- ploring clip for assessing the look and feel of images. InPro- ceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , pages 2555–2563, 2023. 6

    2023

  40. [48]

    Exploiting diffusion prior for real-world image super-resolution

    Jianyi Wang, Zongsheng Yue, Shangchen Zhou, Kelvin CK Chan, and Chen Change Loy. Exploiting diffusion prior for real-world image super-resolution. International Journal of Computer Vision, 132(12):5929–5949, 2024. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8

    2024

  41. [49]

    Recovering realistic texture in image super-resolution by deep spatial feature transform

    Xintao Wang, Ke Yu, Chao Dong, and Chen Change Loy. Recovering realistic texture in image super-resolution by deep spatial feature transform. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 606–615, 2018. 3

    2018

  42. [50]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Si- moncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing, 13(4):600–612, 2004. 6

    2004

  43. [51]

    Aim 2020 challenge on real image super- resolution: Methods and results

    Pengxu Wei, Hannan Lu, Radu Timofte, Liang Lin, Wang- meng Zuo, Zhihong Pan, Baopu Li, Teng Xi, Yanwen Fan, Gang Zhang, et al. Aim 2020 challenge on real image super- resolution: Methods and results. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020 Workshops: Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Pro-...

    2020

  44. [52]

    Component divide- and-conquer for real-world image super-resolution

    Pengxu Wei, Ziwei Xie, Hannan Lu, Zongyuan Zhan, Qixi- ang Ye, Wangmeng Zuo, and Liang Lin. Component divide- and-conquer for real-world image super-resolution. In Com- puter Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glas- gow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part VIII ...

    2020

  45. [53]

    Q-align: Teaching lmms for visual scoring via discrete text-defined levels

    Haoning Wu, Zicheng Zhang, Weixia Zhang, Chaofeng Chen, Liang Liao, Chunyi Li, Yixuan Gao, Annan Wang, Erli Zhang, Wenxiu Sun, et al. Q-align: Teaching lmms for visual scoring via discrete text-defined levels. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17090, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Q-instruct: Improving low-level visual abilities for multi-modality foundation models

    Haoning Wu, Zicheng Zhang, Erli Zhang, Chaofeng Chen, Liang Liao, Annan Wang, Kaixin Xu, Chunyi Li, Jingwen Hou, Guangtao Zhai, et al. Q-instruct: Improving low-level visual abilities for multi-modality foundation models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer v...

    2024

  47. [55]

    Towards open-ended visual quality comparison

    Haoning Wu, Hanwei Zhu, Zicheng Zhang, Erli Zhang, Chaofeng Chen, Liang Liao, Chunyi Li, Annan Wang, Wenxiu Sun, Qiong Yan, et al. Towards open-ended visual quality comparison. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 360–377. Springer, 2024. 3

    2024

  48. [56]

    One-step effective diffusion network for real-world image super-resolution

    Rongyuan Wu, Lingchen Sun, Zhiyuan Ma, and Lei Zhang. One-step effective diffusion network for real-world image super-resolution. Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, 37:92529–92553, 2024. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8

    2024

  49. [57]

    Diffir: Efficient diffusion model for image restoration

    Bin Xia, Yulun Zhang, Shiyin Wang, Yitong Wang, Xing- long Wu, Yapeng Tian, Wenming Yang, and Luc Van Gool. Diffir: Efficient diffusion model for image restoration. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 13095–13105, 2023. 3, 5, 6, 7, 8

    2023

  50. [58]

    Frequency-assisted mamba for remote sensing image super-resolution

    Yi Xiao, Qiangqiang Yuan, Kui Jiang, Yuzeng Chen, Qiang Zhang, and Chia-Wen Lin. Frequency-assisted mamba for remote sensing image super-resolution. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2024. 2

    2024

  51. [59]

    Hq-50k: A large-scale, high-quality dataset for image restoration

    Qinhong Yang, Dongdong Chen, Zhentao Tan, Qiankun Liu, Qi Chu, Jianmin Bao, Lu Yuan, Gang Hua, and Nenghai Yu. Hq-50k: A large-scale, high-quality dataset for image restoration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05390, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Maniqa: Multi-dimension attention network for no-reference image quality assessment

    Sidi Yang, Tianhe Wu, Shuwei Shi, Shanshan Lao, Yuan Gong, Mingdeng Cao, Jiahao Wang, and Yujiu Yang. Maniqa: Multi-dimension attention network for no-reference image quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pag...

    2022

  53. [61]

    Pixel-aware stable diffusion for realistic image super-resolution and personalized stylization

    Tao Yang, Rongyuan Wu, Peiran Ren, Xuansong Xie, and Lei Zhang. Pixel-aware stable diffusion for realistic image super-resolution and personalized stylization. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 74–91. Springer,

  54. [62]

    Depicting beyond scores: Advanc- ing image quality assessment through multi-modal language models

    Zhiyuan You, Zheyuan Li, Jinjin Gu, Zhenfei Yin, Tianfan Xue, and Chao Dong. Depicting beyond scores: Advanc- ing image quality assessment through multi-modal language models. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 259–276. Springer, 2024. 3

    2024

  55. [63]

    Teaching large language models to regress accurate image quality scores using score distribution

    Zhiyuan You, Xin Cai, Jinjin Gu, Tianfan Xue, and Chao Dong. Teaching large language models to regress accurate image quality scores using score distribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.11561, 2025. 3

    2025

  56. [64]

    Scaling up to excellence: Practicing model scaling for photo- realistic image restoration in the wild

    Fanghua Yu, Jinjin Gu, Zheyuan Li, Jinfan Hu, Xiangtao Kong, Xintao Wang, Jingwen He, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Scaling up to excellence: Practicing model scaling for photo- realistic image restoration in the wild. CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  57. [65]

    Sf-iqa: Quality and similarity integration for ai generated im- age quality assessment

    Zihao Yu, Fengbin Guan, Yiting Lu, Xin Li, and Zhibo Chen. Sf-iqa: Quality and similarity integration for ai generated im- age quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6692–6701, 2024. 3

    2024

  58. [66]

    Resshift: Efficient diffusion model for image super- resolution by residual shifting

    Zongsheng Yue, Jianyi Wang, and Chen Change Loy. Resshift: Efficient diffusion model for image super- resolution by residual shifting. Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, 36:13294–13307, 2023. 5, 6

    2023

  59. [67]

    Arbitrary-steps image super-resolution via diffusion inver- sion

    Zongsheng Yue, Kang Liao, and Chen Change Loy. Arbitrary-steps image super-resolution via diffusion inver- sion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09013, 2024. 5, 6

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    On sin- gle image scale-up using sparse-representations

    Roman Zeyde, Michael Elad, and Matan Protter. On sin- gle image scale-up using sparse-representations. In Interna- tional conference on curves and surfaces , pages 711–730. Springer, 2010. 3

    2010

  61. [69]

    Accurate image restora- tion with attention retractable transformer

    Jiale Zhang, Yulun Zhang, Jinjin Gu, Yongbing Zhang, Linghe Kong, and Xin Yuan. Accurate image restora- tion with attention retractable transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01427, 2022. 3

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution

    Kai Zhang, Jingyun Liang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timo- fte. Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4791– 4800, 2021. 3

    2021

  63. [71]

    Adding con- ditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding con- ditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv:2302.05543, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Transcending the limit of local window: Ad- vanced super-resolution transformer with adaptive token dic- tionary.(2024)

    Leheng Zhang, Yawei Li, Xingyu Zhou, Xiaorui Zhao, and Shuhang Gu. Transcending the limit of local window: Ad- vanced super-resolution transformer with adaptive token dic- tionary.(2024). CoRR abs/2401.08209, 2024. 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  65. [73]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shecht- man, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion, pages 586–595, 2018. 6

    2018

  66. [74]

    Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks

    Yulun Zhang, Kunpeng Li, Kai Li, Lichen Wang, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 286–301, 2018. 2, 3

    2018

  67. [75]

    Residual dense network for image super-resolution

    Yulun Zhang, Yapeng Tian, Yu Kong, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Residual dense network for image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2472–2481, 2018. 3

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.