Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Plasma Instabilities Dominate Radioactive Transients Magnetic Fields: The self-confinement of leptons in Type Ia and Core-Collapse Supernovae, and Kilonovae

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Plasma instabilities, not stellar fields, confine supernova positrons

desk verdict A credible instability-driven field-generation mechanism with a solid PIC core, but the paper's spatial-confinement claim is inferred from periodic-box runs and needs a transport calculation before it can explain SNe Ia positron trapping. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15335 v2 pith:EDWW4MZR submitted 2025-04-21 astro-ph.HE

Dhvanil D. Desai , Colby C. Haggerty , Benjamin J. Shappee , Michael A. Tucker , Zachary Davis , Chris Ashall , Laura Chomiuk , Keyan Gootkin
show 3 more authors
Damiano Caprioli Antoine Bret Hayk Hakobyan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords supernovae:generalkilonovaeplasmasinstabilitiesmagneticfieldspositronconfinementparticle-in-cellsimulationssynchrotronemission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the magnetic fields which confine high-energy leptons in the ejecta of radioactive transients do not have to be inherited from the progenitor star: they can be generated on the spot by the decay leptons themselves. Fully kinetic particle-in-cell simulations show that positrons emitted near 1 MeV by radioactive decay drive plasma streaming instabilities even when the initial magnetic field is zero, and the resulting fields slow lepton diffusion and transfer lepton energy to the thermal plasma. If this picture is right, the long-standing puzzle of why positrons stay trapped in Type Ia supernova ejecta for thousands of days is solved without invoking pre-existing fields of $10^9$ G or more. The same mechanism is applied to core-collapse supernovae and kilonovae, where it would shape both energy transport and the magnetic environment of the ejecta.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the filamentation (Weibel-type) streaming instability: a relativistic beam of decay leptons moving through a colder electron-ion plasma amplifies transverse magnetic fluctuations even from zero initial field, saturating when the lepton Larmor radius becomes comparable to the electron inertial length. The paper's bridge from microphysics to astrophysical transients is the instantaneous-saturation ansatz: because the instability saturates in microseconds while transients evolve over days, the magnetic field at any time is taken to be the equilibrium value for the current ion density and decay-lepton fraction, as encoded in the scaling relation above. That scaling relation, calibrated by a suite of simulations with varying lepton fraction and energy, is what turns a small periodic box into a time-dependent magnetic field for an expanding supernova or kilonova.

What would settle it

A nearby, circumstellar-free Type Ia supernova observed with LOFAR or SKAO about 20 days after explosion should show synchrotron radio emission peaking near 1 GHz at the level derived from the saturation scaling; a non-detection well below that predicted luminosity would falsify the claimed field strength and confinement. A particle-in-cell run with continuous isotropic lepton injection and an expanding box that fails to sustain the saturated field would falsify the instantaneous-saturation bridge.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using fully kinetic particle-in-cell simulations, the paper shows that relativistic decay leptons (positrons with Lorentz factor $\gamma \approx 2$ and kinetic energy around 0.5 MeV) streaming through a cold electron-ion plasma drive a filamentation-type streaming instability from zero initial magnetic field. The instability grows on electron-plasma-frequency timescales, saturates within microseconds, and produces a magnetic field whose amplitude scales as $B_{\mathrm{sat}} \approx 0.22\,\mathrm{G}\,\sqrt{n_i/10^7\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}}\,(f_p/0.2)^{0.79}\,(E_p/0.5\,\mathrm{MeV})^{0.77}$. In the fiducial Type Ia supernova case the field reaches about 0.34 G with a coherence length comparable to the positron Larmor radius, which scatters the positrons, reduces their drift speed, and transfers roughly half their kinetic energy to electrons and ions within about 7.5 microseconds. Applied to real transients through an instantaneous-saturation prescription, the self-generated field exceeds the strongest plausible progenitor fields within about a day after explosion and remains above the interstellar field until roughly $10^5$ days, providing a natural mechanism for the positron trapping inferred from late-time Type Ia supernova observations.

Load-bearing premise

The whole transient-level conclusion rests on assuming that the magnetic field at any instant is set only by the current density and current fraction of fast decay particles, not by the magnetic field that was built up earlier in the ejecta.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Late-time Type Ia supernova light curves out to about 2400 days, and nebular spectra that require low-velocity energy deposition, are explained without invoking pre-existing white-dwarf fields above $10^9$ G.
  • Plasma-generated fields exceed progenitor fields within roughly a day for typical Type Ia, Type II, stripped-envelope supernovae, and kilonovae, and stay above the interstellar field until about $10^5$ days, so the ejecta magnetization is self-generated for most of its observable life.
  • Kilonova light-curve models that require lepton confinement gain a physical mechanism, because $\beta^-$-decay electrons drive the same instability and are trapped to deposit their energy locally.
  • Prompt synchrotron radio emission from trapped positrons in Type Ia supernovae peaks near 1 GHz about 20 days after explosion and is detectable only for a Galactic or local-group supernova in a clean environment with next-generation radio facilities.
  • The instability transfers almost half the positron kinetic energy into thermal electrons and ions within microseconds, so energy deposition in the collisionless regime is dominated by collective plasma heating rather than Coulomb collisions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: because the saturated field in the scaling relation depends only on local density and lepton fraction, the magnetic structure of a real ejecta should trace the distribution of radioactive material, so centrally concentrated nickel should produce a central magnetic core and mixing should dilute the field; nebular line profiles that depend on local deposition could test this mapping.
  • Inference: the paper's fully isotropic test shows that isotropic decay alone does not drive the instability, so the mechanism relies on beam-like anisotropy at the leading edge of an expanding lepton shell; sustaining confinement at late times may require continuous fresh injection rather than a single instantaneously injected population.
  • Inference: the same instability should operate in any collisionless plasma with a fast lepton beam, so the results plausibly extend beyond radioactively powered transients to other beam-driven environments such as gamma-ray-burst internal shocks, where self-generated fields would alter particle transport and radiation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes that plasma streaming instabilities, rather than pre-existing magnetic fields, confine the ~MeV leptons that power radioactive transients. The authors linearize a cold three-species fluid model to identify the fastest-growing oblique/filamentation modes, then run 3D particle-in-cell simulations with tristan-mp v2 for a relativistic positron beam in an unmagnetized electron-ion plasma. The fiducial simulation produces perpendicular magnetic fields that saturate at approximately 0.34 G for n_i = 10^7 cm^-3 and f_p = 0.2, with a growth rate of 0.12 omega_pe in agreement with the linear-theory value of 0.125 omega_pe, and the power spectrum peaks at the expected oblique modes. A parameter study yields the scaling B_sat = 0.22 G sqrt(n_i / 10^7 cm^-3) (f_p / 0.2)^0.79 (E_p / 0.5 MeV)^0.77 (Eq. 4). The paper then applies Eq. 4 to SNe Ia, Type II SNe, stripped-envelope SNe, and kilonovae, arguing that the self-generated fields exceed progenitor and ISM fields after roughly a day and that positrons are locally confined, explaining late-time SN Ia light curves; it also estimates prompt synchrotron radio emission from SN Ia positrons.

Significance. The paper is valuable for connecting kinetic plasma physics to a long-standing problem in transient astrophysics. If the spatial-confinement step were established, it would remove the need for 10^6 G pre-existing fields in SNe Ia and place plasma-generated fields at the center of lepton transport in a wide class of transients. The strengths are the clean linear-theory/simulation consistency check (growth rate and mode obliquity), the transparent power-law saturation law with explicit exponents and normalization, the use of a public PIC code, and the falsifiable radio-synchrotron predictions that are appropriately caveated. The main limitation is not the instability physics but the leap from velocity-space isotropization to spatial confinement; this is acknowledged in Section 5 but is nevertheless load-bearing for the astrophysical conclusion.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1.2 and Section 5] The central claim that self-generated fields confine leptons is not directly demonstrated. The simulation box is periodic (Section 3.1.1) and the beam is spatially uniform, so no particle can leave the system; what is measured is relaxation of the positron distribution in velocity space (Figure 4b, drift decreasing from 0.866c to ~0.67c). The inference in Section 3.1.2 that 'perpendicular fields suggest that the positrons will remain fixed at the same mass coordinates' is therefore a physical extrapolation, not a numerical result. The quantitative status is especially delicate because the saturated correlation length (~20 d_e ≈ 34 m at 100 d) is comparable to the positron Larmor radius (~50 m), not much smaller, so the deeply magnetized guiding-center regime is not reached. To substantiate 'slow lepton diffusion' and local energy deposition (abstract; Sections 4.2 and 5), the authors should provide a spatial diffusion coefficient or mean free path derived from the simulated field statistics, or run a non-periodic/open-boundary setup, and compare the resulting diffusion length with the ejecta radius over months. The paper itself notes in Section 5 that such transport models are future work, which confirms that the confinement conclusion currently rests on an untested step.
  2. [Section 4.2.2 and Eq. 4] The application of Eq. 4 to an expanding ejecta relies on the assumption, stated in Section 4.2.2, that 'the plasma instability at each moment in time is independent of its past behavior and depends solely on the particle densities at that time.' This instantaneous-saturation ansatz is not tested. In reality, the field generated at earlier times is advected and diluted by homologous expansion, while new leptons are continuously injected; the saturated field at time t could depend on the field history, the injection history, and the expansion rate. The predicted B_plas(t) ∝ t^-1.5 and the conclusion that plasma-generated fields dominate progenitor fields (Figure 8) both rely on this assumption. A justification based on the separation between the microsecond instability timescale and the day expansion timescale would help, but the field is amplified and then transported over much longer times; an expanding-box simulation or a numerical experiment with slowly varying density is needed to validate the ansatz.
  3. [Section 4.5.2] The extension to kilonovae replaces the positron fraction f_p with an electron fraction f_e while retaining the positron-calibrated Eq. 4. No electron-beam simulation is presented, and the nonlinear saturation physics for a light beam species that is identical to the background species (rather than a positron beam) is not obviously the same: the return-current geometry and the two-stream couplings differ. At minimum, this extrapolation should be flagged as an assumption in the KNe section, or supported by a dedicated electron-beam simulation; as written, the KNe field estimates in Figure 8d are a model extrapolation rather than a simulation-based prediction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1.2] There is a duplicated word in the sentence describing the saturated field: 'perpendicular perpendicular to the bulk flow' should be 'perpendicular to the bulk flow'.
  2. [Section 4.2.2] The phrase 'Assuming a dipole field and the the expansion conserving magnetic flux' contains a duplicated 'the' and should be corrected.
  3. [Sections 4.3.2 and 4.4.2] The ion mass is written as 'm_i = 56 m_e' in both sections, but the numerical value given (9.3 × 10^-23 g) corresponds to 56 m_p (proton masses), not 56 m_e. This typo could confuse readers who rely on the formula rather than the number.
  4. [Section 3.1.1] The fiducial positron fraction is stated as f_p = 0.2, 'motivated by the 56Ni decay channel'; Table 1 lists the 56Co β+ branching ratio as 19.7%. The small difference is negligible, but stating the rounded value explicitly would improve consistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (4) is a fit to simulation outputs, not to the supernova observations it is later compared with.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: linear theory identifies unstable modes, PIC simulations measure saturated fields, Eq. (4) summarizes those simulation results, and the formula is then evaluated at transient densities, decay fractions, and lepton energies to estimate B_plas(t). That estimate is compared with progenitor/ISM fields and with the qualitative observational requirement of late-time positron trapping. No step reduces to its own output: the normalization and exponents of Eq. (4) are fit to the simulation suite in Section 3.2, while the SNe Ia light-curve and spectral constraints (Tucker et al. 2022; Ashall et al. 2024) are never used to adjust the fit, so the comparison is not statistically forced. The linear theory is checked against the simulations rather than used to define the saturated amplitude. The self-citations present (e.g., Hakobyan et al. 2023 for the code, Gupta et al. 2021 for shock trapping, and the observational anchors co-authored by some of the present authors) are external evidence or code references and are not load-bearing for the transient field calculation. The explicit instantaneous-saturation ansatz in Section 4.2.2 is a stated modeling assumption, not a circular definition of the result, though it does limit extrapolation. The periodic-boundary PIC setup does not directly measure spatial escape, which is a validation gap for the confinement inference, but that is a correctness risk rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the PIC simulations and the linear theory, which are well-established methods. The scaling law constants are fitted to the simulation suite. The key assumptions are the beam-like injection, the unmagnetized initial state, the periodic box, the artificial ion mass ratio, and the instantaneous-saturation ansatz used to map simulation results onto expanding ejecta. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • B_sat normalization constant = 0.22 G
    Fitted to the fiducial PIC simulation results at n_i=1e7 cm^-3, f_p=0.2, E_p=0.5 MeV; the constant normalizes Eq. 4.
  • f_p exponent = 0.79 ± 0.02
    Power-law exponent fitted to saturated magnetic field as a function of lepton fraction across a simulation suite (Section 3.2, Figure 6).
  • E_p exponent = 0.77 ± 0.03
    Power-law exponent fitted to saturated magnetic field as a function of decay lepton energy across a simulation suite (Section 3.2).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The plasma is collisionless over the timescales of interest, so the Vlasov-Maxwell system applies.
    Invoked in Sections 1 and 3 to justify PIC simulations; holds once ejecta density drops enough, but is not true at very early times, a limitation acknowledged in Section 5.
  • domain assumption The heavy ions can be treated as a cold, immobile, neutralizing background in the linear theory.
    Section 2, linearization; supported in Section 3.1 by the simulation showing ion response is slow, but the artificial mass ratio mi/me=25 modifies ion dynamics.
  • ad hoc to paper The high-energy leptons form a cold, mono-energetic, beam-like population with zero net current (electrons co-drift to cancel current).
    Section 3.1.1 and Appendix A. Real beta-decay positrons are emitted isotropically with a spectrum; the beam assumption is the most extreme escape configuration, and Appendix A shows a fully isotropic distribution does not drive the instability.
  • ad hoc to paper The saturated magnetic field at any time in an expanding ejecta depends only on the instantaneous local density and lepton fraction, independent of the past field evolution.
    Section 4.2.2: 'The plasma instability at each moment in time is assumed to be independent of its past behavior...' This is the key simplifying assumption for all transient applications and is not tested.
  • ad hoc to paper Periodic boundary conditions in the PIC box represent a local patch of the ejecta, and the beam is replenished instantaneously.
    Section 3.1.1; periodic box means particles cannot escape, so the simulation cannot directly demonstrate spatial confinement; the instantaneous injection is noted as a simplification in Section 5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Plasma Instabilities Dominate Radioactive Transients Magnetic Fields: The self-confinement of leptons in Type Ia and Core-Collapse Supernovae, and Kilonovae." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EDWW4MZR

@misc{pith2026250415335,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Plasma Instabilities Dominate Radioactive Transients Magnetic Fields: The self-confinement of leptons in Type Ia and Core-Collapse Supernovae, and Kilonovae},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EDWW4MZR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15335}
}
abstract

The light curves of radioactive transients, such as supernovae and kilonovae, are powered by the decay of radioisotopes, which release high-energy leptons through $\beta^+$ and $\beta^-$ decays. These leptons deposit energy into the expanding ejecta. As the ejecta density decreases during expansion, the plasma becomes collisionless, with particle motion governed by electromagnetic forces. In such environments, strong or turbulent magnetic fields are thought to confine particles, though the origin of these fields and the confinement mechanism have remained unclear. Using fully kinetic particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations, we demonstrate that plasma instabilities can naturally confine high-energy leptons. These leptons generate magnetic fields through plasma streaming instabilities, even in the absence of pre-existing fields. The self-generated magnetic fields slow lepton diffusion, enabling confinement and transferring energy to thermal electrons and ions. Our results naturally explain the positron trapping inferred from late-time observations of thermonuclear and core-collapse supernovae. Furthermore, they suggest potential implications for electron dynamics in the ejecta of kilonovae. We also estimate synchrotron radio luminosities from positrons for Type Ia supernovae and find that such emission could only be detectable with next-generation radio observatories from a Galactic or local-group supernova in an environment without any circumstellar material.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.15335 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top: The linear theory growth rate of the perpendicular magnetic field (𝑦 and 𝑧) as a function of wave number, 𝑘𝑥 (parallel) and 𝑘⊥ = √︃ 𝑘 2 𝑦 + 𝑘 2 𝑧 for the fiducial simulation in units of inverse of the background electron plasma frequency and inverse inertial length, respectively. Bottom: The power spectrum for the magnetic field in the fiducial simulation over the same 𝑘 range. The power spectrum was calculated… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Perpendicular magnetic field averaged over the simulation box for the fiducial SN Ia simulation at 100 days post-explosion with a density of 𝑛𝑖 ≈ 107 cm−3 (solid blue line). The dashed black line shows the growth rate of the instability by fitting the exponential part of the growth, and is given in the legend. Due to the symmetry of the problem, 𝐵𝑦 = 𝐵𝑧. 3.1.2 Simulation Results We begin by examining a fiducial simu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Magnetic field 𝐵𝑧 in a slice through the 𝑥 𝑦-plane for a set of times for the fiducial SN Ia simulation at 100 days post-explosion with a density of 𝑛𝑖 ≈ 107 cm−3 . Physical length scale is given in the first panel and is identical for all panels. The panel for 𝑡 = 0 is not shown because the magnetic field is zero across the grid by definition. At time 𝑡 = 26 𝜔−1 pe = 0.15 𝜇s, the magnetic fields are growing exponen… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mean kinetic energy of positrons, electrons, and ions as a function of time for the fiducial parameters. This simulation goes past the fiducial 3 𝜇s up to 7.5 𝜇s to show the increasing ion kinetic energies. ions. Although our simulations used an artificially low ion-to…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Magnetic field as a function of time for various high-energy lepton fractions 𝑓𝑝 at 100 days post-explosion for a typical SN Ia with a density of 𝑛𝑖 ≈ 107 cm−3 . The decay lepton energy is kept constant at 𝐸𝑝 = 0.5 MeV. The relation between the magnetic field saturatio…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relative fractions of different isotopes of the 56Ni decay chain and the positrons produced in the decay steps as a function of time. The solid red curve for the relative number of positrons also includes their destruc￾tion through electron-positron annihilation, which…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Magnetic field evolution from plasma instabilities compared to progenitor and ISM fields for SNe Ia, SNe II, SE SNe, and KNe. The instability saturates almost instantaneously (< 3 𝜇s), making the magnetic field at any time dependent on ejecta density and decay lepton f…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Wakes from Companion Interactions in Type Ia Supernovae Nebular Emission Line Profiles

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The wake carved by a surviving companion in a Type Ia supernova produces detectable, viewing-angle dependent distortions in the [Co III] and [Ar III] nebular line profiles.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

203 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P., et al., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017PhRvL.119p1101A 119, 161101

    Abbott B. P., et al., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017PhRvL.119p1101A 119, 161101

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101

  2. [2]

    P., et al., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..12A 848, L12

    Abbott B. P., et al., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..12A 848, L12

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9

  3. [3]

    M., Richmond M., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/116886 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994AJ....107..662A 107, 662

    Aldering G., Humphreys R. M., Richmond M., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/116886 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994AJ....107..662A 107, 662

    doi:10.1086/116886 1994

  4. [4]

    P., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935027 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628A...7A 628, A7

    Anderson J. P., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935027 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628A...7A 628, A7

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935027 2019

  5. [5]

    Arcavi I., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature24291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.551...64A 551, 64

    doi:10.1038/nature24291 2017

  6. [6]

    D., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159681 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...253..785A 253, 785

    Arnett W. D., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159681 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...253..785A 253, 785

    doi:10.1086/159681 1982

  7. [7]

    Arnett D., 1996, Supernovae and Nucleosynthesis: An Investigation of the History of Matter from the Big Bang to the Present

    1996

  8. [8]

    Arnould M., Goriely S., Takahashi K., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.06.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PhR...450...97A 450, 97

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.06.002 2007

Show all 203 references
  1. [9]

    Ashall C., Mazzali P., Bersier D., Hachinger S., Phillips M., Percival S., James P., Maguire K., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1995 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.4427A 445, 4427

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    A., Pian E., James P

    Ashall C., Mazzali P. A., Pian E., James P. A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2114 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463.1891A 463, 1891

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    Ashall C., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1654 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...875L..14A 875, L14

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    Ashall C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6608 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..203A 975, 203

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    Baer-Way R., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2175 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964..172B 964, 172

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Barnes J., Kasen D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...775...18B 775, 18

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    Barnes J., Kasen D., Wu M.-R., Mart \' nez-Pinedo G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/110 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...829..110B 829, 110

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    L., Lund K

    Barnes J., Zhu Y. L., Lund K. A., Sprouse T. M., Vassh N., McLaughlin G. C., Mumpower M. R., Surman R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0aec , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...918...44B 918, 44

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    R., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/182.2.147 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978MNRAS.182..147B 182, 147

    Bell A. R., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/182.2.147 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978MNRAS.182..147B 182, 147

    1978 doi

  10. [18]

    R., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08097.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.353..550B 353, 550

    Bell A. R., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08097.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.353..550B 353, 550

    2004

  11. [19]

    M., Li X., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/261 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...833..261B 833, 261

    Beloborodov A. M., Li X., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/261 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...833..261B 833, 261

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    G., Bersten M

    Benvenuto O. G., Bersten M. C., Nomoto K., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...762...74B 762, 74

    2013 doi

  13. [21]

    Bhattacharya D., 2002, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/BF02702467 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002JApA...23...67B 23, 67

    2002 doi

  14. [22]

    J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.3931B 474, 3931

    Blondin S., Dessart L., Hillier D. J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.3931B 474, 3931

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    arXiv:1912.12699

    Braun R., Bonaldi A., Bourke T., Keane E., Wagg J., 2019, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.1912.12699 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv191212699B p. arXiv:1912.12699

    2019 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    Bret A., 2007, @doi [Computer Physics Communications] 10.1016/j.cpc.2006.11.006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007CoPhC.176..362B 176, 362

    2007 doi

  17. [25]

    Bret A., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/990 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...699..990B 699, 990

    2009 doi

  18. [26]

    E., 2010, @doi [Physics of Plasmas] http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3514586 , 17, 120501

    Bret A., Gremillet L., Dieckmann M. E., 2010, @doi [Physics of Plasmas] http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3514586 , 17, 120501

    2010 doi

  19. [27]

    Camacho-Neves Y., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acd558 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951...67C 951, 67

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    Caprioli D., Spitkovsky A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/765/1/L20 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...765L..20C 765, L20

    2013 doi

  21. [29]

    Cattell C., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abefdd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...911L..29C 911, L29

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172393 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...405..614C 405, 614

    Chan K.-W., Lingenfelter R. E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172393 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...405..614C 405, 614

    1993 doi

  23. [31]

    M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acb6d8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944L..28C 944, L28

    Chen N. M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acb6d8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944L..28C 944, L28

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2173 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.3816C 454, 3816

    Childress M. J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2173 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.3816C 454, 3816

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    Chomiuk L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/119 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821..119C 821, 119

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    Chornock R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa905c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..19C 848, L19

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    Ciolfi R., 2020, @doi [General Relativity and Gravitation] 10.1007/s10714-020-02714-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020GReGr..52...59C 52, 59

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    C., Benetti S., Frueh M., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176919 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...459..547C 459, 547

    Clocchiatti A., Wheeler J. C., Benetti S., Frueh M., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176919 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...459..547C 459, 547

    1996 doi

  29. [37]

    A., Petschek A

    Colgate S. A., Petschek A. G., Kriese J. T., 1980, @doi [ ] 10.1086/183239 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...237L..81C 237, L81

    1980 doi

  30. [38]

    A., et al., 2017, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aap9811 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...358.1556C 358, 1556

    Coulter D. A., et al., 2017, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aap9811 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...358.1556C 358, 1556

    2017 doi

  31. [39]

    S., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8fc7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..17C 848, L17

    Cowperthwaite P. S., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8fc7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..17C 848, L17

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    M., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00540.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.391L...5C 391, L5

    Crockett R. M., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00540.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.391L...5C 391, L5

    2008

  33. [41]

    Crusius A., Schlickeiser R., 1986, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 164, L16

    1986

  34. [42]

    M., Giannios D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8bc2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...976..182D 976, 182

    Davis Z., Rueda-Becerril J. M., Giannios D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8bc2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...976..182D 976, 182

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1932 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524..767D 524, 767

    Desai D. D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1932 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524..767D 524, 767

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038148 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...642A..33D 642, A33

    Dessart L., Hillier D. J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038148 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...642A..33D 642, A33

    2020 doi

  37. [46]

    J., Sukhbold T., Woosley S

    Dessart L., Hillier D. J., Sukhbold T., Woosley S. E., Janka H. T., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141927 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...656A..61D 656, A61

    2021 doi

  38. [47]

    P., Kuncarayakti H., Fox O

    Dessart L., Guti \'e rrez C. P., Kuncarayakti H., Fox O. D., Filippenko A. V., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202345969 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...675A..33D 675, A33

    doi

  39. [48]

    J., Woosley S

    Dessart L., Hillier D. J., Woosley S. E., Kuncarayakti H., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346626 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A...7D 677, A7

    doi

  40. [49]

    Drewes M., McDonald J., Sablon L., Vitagliano E., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7874 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934...99D 934, 99

    2022 doi

  41. [50]

    R., et al., 2017, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aaq0049 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...358.1570D 358, 1570

    Drout M. R., et al., 2017, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aaq0049 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...358.1570D 358, 1570

    2017 doi

  42. [51]

    Ertini K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2705 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526..279E 526, 279

    2023 doi

  43. [52]

    T., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-015-0152-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015SSRv..191..111F 191, 111

    Ferrario L., de Martino D., G \"a nsicke B. T., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-015-0152-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015SSRv..191..111F 191, 111

    2015 doi

  44. [53]

    V., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ARA&A..35..309F 35, 309

    Filippenko A. V., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ARA&A..35..309F 35, 309

    1997 doi

  45. [54]

    Fl \"o rs A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.2902F 491, 2902

    2020 doi

  46. [55]

    Foglizzo T., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2015.9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASA...32....9F 32, e009

    2015 doi

  47. [56]

    Fontaine G., Brassard P., Bergeron P., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/319535 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001PASP..113..409F 113, 409

    2001 doi

  48. [57]

    Garasev M., Derishev E., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1345 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461..641G 461, 641

    2016 doi

  49. [58]

    M., Hirschi R., Eggenberger P., Maeder A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118340 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...542A..29G 542, A29

    Georgy C., Ekstr \"o m S., Meynet G., Massey P., Levesque E. M., Hirschi R., Eggenberger P., Maeder A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118340 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...542A..29G 542, A29

    2012 doi

  50. [59]

    arXiv:2410.05388

    Golant R., Vanthieghem A., Groselj D., Sironi L., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2410.05388 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241005388G p. arXiv:2410.05388

    2024 doi arXiv

  51. [60]

    Goriely S., Bauswein A., Janka H.-T., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/738/2/L32 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...738L..32G 738, L32

    2011 doi

  52. [61]

    J., 1979, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A&A....76..306G 76, 306

    Gould R. J., 1979, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A&A....76..306G 76, 306

    1979

  53. [62]

    P., Vink J

    Gr \"a fener G., Owocki S. P., Vink J. S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117497 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...538A..40G 538, A40

    2012 doi

  54. [63]

    Graur O., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf1c3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...870...14G 870, 14

    2019 doi

  55. [64]

    M., Riess A

    Graur O., Zurek D., Shara M. M., Riess A. G., Seitenzahl I. R., Rest A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/31 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...819...31G 819, 31

    2016 doi

  56. [65]

    Graur O., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabe25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859...79G 859, 79

    2018 doi

  57. [66]

    Grossman D., Korobkin O., Rosswog S., Piran T., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2503 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439..757G 439, 757

    2014 doi

  58. [67]

    C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac23cf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...923..208G 923, 208

    Gupta S., Caprioli D., Haggerty C. C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac23cf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...923..208G 923, 208

    2021 doi

  59. [68]

    P., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f52 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850...89G 850, 89

    Guti \'e rrez C. P., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f52 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850...89G 850, 89

    2017 doi

  60. [69]

    Hakobyan H., Spitkovsky A., Chernoglazov A., Philippov A., Groselj D., Mahlmann J., 2023, PrincetonUniversity/tristan-mp-v2: v2.6, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.7566725 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7566725

    2023 doi

  61. [70]

    Hamuy M., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/344689 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...582..905H 582, 905

    2003 doi

  62. [71]

    L., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055221 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARA&A..55..111H 55, 111

    Han J. L., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055221 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARA&A..55..111H 55, 111

    2017 doi

  63. [72]

    E., Sarbadhicary S

    Harris C. E., Sarbadhicary S. K., Chomiuk L., Piro A. L., Sand D. J., Valenti S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acd84f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...952...24H 952, 24

    2023 doi

  64. [73]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2053 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.1060H 534, 1060

    Hatt E. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2053 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.1060H 534, 1060

    2024 doi

  65. [74]

    arXiv:2412.04386

    Healy S., Horiuchi S., Ashall C., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04386 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241204386H p. arXiv:2412.04386

    2024 doi arXiv

  66. [75]

    L., Woosley S

    Heger A., Fryer C. L., Woosley S. E., Langer N., Hartmann D. H., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/375341 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...591..288H 591, 288

    2003 doi

  67. [76]

    Holmbo S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245334 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...675A..83H 675, A83

    2023 doi

  68. [77]

    A., 1960, @doi [ ] 10.1086/146963 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1960ApJ...132..565H 132, 565

    Hoyle F., Fowler W. A., 1960, @doi [ ] 10.1086/146963 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1960ApJ...132..565H 132, 565

    1960 doi

  69. [78]

    C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0ef8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...923..210H 923, 210

    Hristov B., Hoeflich P., Collins D. C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0ef8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...923..210H 923, 210

    2021 doi

  70. [79]

    P., Popov S

    Igoshev A. P., Popov S. B., Hollerbach R., 2021, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe7090351 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Univ....7..351I 7, 351

    2021 doi

  71. [80]

    R., Thielemann F.-K., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/313278 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..125..439I 125, 439

    Iwamoto K., Brachwitz F., Nomoto K., Kishimoto N., Umeda H., Hix W. R., Thielemann F.-K., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/313278 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..125..439I 125, 439

    1999 doi

  72. [81]

    Jerkstrand A., Fransson C., Kozma C., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015937 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...530A..45J 530, A45

    2011 doi

  73. [82]

    Jerkstrand A., Fransson C., Maguire K., Smartt S., Ergon M., Spyromilio J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219528 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...546A..28J 546, A28

    2012 doi

  74. [83]

    Jerkstrand A., Ergon M., Smartt S. J., Fransson C., Sollerman J., Taubenberger S., Bersten M., Spyromilio J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423983 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...573A..12J 573, A12

    2015 doi

  75. [84]

    W., 2017, in Alsabti A

    Jha S. W., 2017, in Alsabti A. W., Murdin P., eds, , Handbook of Supernovae. p. 375, @doi 10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_42

    2017 doi

  76. [85]

    D., Kashibadze O

    Karachentsev I. D., Kashibadze O. G., 2006, @doi [Astrophysics] 10.1007/s10511-006-0002-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Ap.....49....3K 49, 3

    2006 doi

  77. [86]

    A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae829 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.4577K 529, 4577

    Karinkuzhi D., Mukhopadhyay B., Wickramasinghe D., Tout C. A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae829 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.4577K 529, 4577

    2024 doi

  78. [87]

    Kasen D., Barnes J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab06c2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876..128K 876, 128

    2019 doi

  79. [88]

    R., Barnes J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...774...25K 774, 25

    Kasen D., Badnell N. R., Barnes J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...774...25K 774, 25

    2013 doi

  80. [89]

    Kasen D., Metzger B., Barnes J., Quataert E., Ramirez-Ruiz E., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature24453 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.551...80K 551, 80

    2017 doi

  81. [90]

    M., et al., 2017, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aap9455 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...358.1559K 358, 1559

    Kasliwal M. M., et al., 2017, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aap9455 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...358.1559K 358, 1559

    2017 doi

  82. [91]

    M., Beloborodov A

    Kaspi V. M., Beloborodov A. M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023329 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARA&A..55..261K 55, 261

    2017 doi

  83. [92]

    D., et al., 2017, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aaq0073 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...358.1583K 358, 1583

    Kilpatrick C. D., et al., 2017, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aaq0073 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...358.1583K 358, 1583

    2017 doi

  84. [93]

    Kiuchi K., Kyutoku K., Sekiguchi Y., Shibata M., Wada T., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.041502 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PhRvD..90d1502K 90, 041502

    2014 doi

  85. [94]

    Kiuchi K., Cerd \'a -Dur \'a n P., Kyutoku K., Sekiguchi Y., Shibata M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.124034 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PhRvD..92l4034K 92, 124034

    2015 doi

  86. [96]

    u lebi B., Jordan S., Euchner F., G \

    K \"u lebi B., Jordan S., Euchner F., G \"a nsicke B. T., Hirsch H., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912570 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...506.1341K 506, 1341

    2009 doi

  87. [97]

    Kushnir D., Waxman E., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa690 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.5617K 493, 5617

    2020 doi

  88. [98]

    K., Boutloukos S., 2008, in Milone E

    Lamb F. K., Boutloukos S., 2008, in Milone E. F., Leahy D. A., Hobill D. W., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 352, Astrophysics and Space Science Library. p. 87 ( @eprint arXiv 0705.0155 ), @doi 10.1007/978-1-4020-6544-6_5

    2008 arXiv

  89. [99]

    M., Prakash M., 2004, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1090720 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Sci...304..536L 304, 536

    Lattimer J. M., Prakash M., 2004, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1090720 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Sci...304..536L 304, 536

    2004 doi

  90. [100]

    Leloudas G., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912364 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...505..265L 505, 265

    2009 doi

  91. [101]

    M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newar.2009.10.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010NewAR..54....1L 54, 1

    Levesque E. M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newar.2009.10.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010NewAR..54....1L 54, 1

    2010 doi

  92. [102]

    M., 2017, Astrophysics of Red Supergiants , @doi 10.1088/978-0-7503-1329-2

    Levesque E. M., 2017, Astrophysics of Red Supergiants , @doi 10.1088/978-0-7503-1329-2

    2017 doi

  93. [103]

    M., Massey P., Olsen K

    Levesque E. M., Massey P., Olsen K. A. G., Plez B., Josselin E., Maeder A., Meynet G., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...628..973L 628, 973

    2005 doi

  94. [104]

    Li L.-X., Paczy \'n ski B., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311680 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...507L..59L 507, L59

    1998 doi

  95. [105]

    J., Dessart L., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21198.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426.1671L 426, 1671

    Li C., Hillier D. J., Dessart L., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21198.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426.1671L 426, 1671

    2012

  96. [106]

    Li W., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2b49 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...882...30L 882, 30

    2019 doi

  97. [107]

    B., Graur O., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/90 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827...90L 827, 90

    Liu Y.-Q., Modjaz M., Bianco F. B., Graur O., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/90 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827...90L 827, 90

    2016 doi

  98. [108]

    Liu J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.1268L 526, 1268

    2023 doi

  99. [109]

    X., Hungerford A

    Magkotsios G., Timmes F. X., Hungerford A. L., Fryer C. L., Young P. A., Wiescher M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/191/1/66 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJS..191...66M 191, 66

    2010 doi

  100. [110]

    Maoz D., Mannucci F., Nelemans G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141031 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA&A..52..107M 52, 107

    2014 doi

  101. [111]

    Martinez L., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142076 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...660A..41M 660, A41

    2022 doi

  102. [112]

    V., Li W., Leonard D

    Matheson T., Filippenko A. V., Li W., Leonard D. C., Shields J. C., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/319390 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....121.1648M 121, 1648

    2001 doi

  103. [113]

    Mathias P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732542 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...615A.116M 615, A116

    2018 doi

  104. [114]

    R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx879 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.2202M 469, 2202

    Maund J. R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx879 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.2202M 469, 2202

    2017 doi

  105. [115]

    R., Smartt S

    Maund J. R., Smartt S. J., Kudritzki R. P., Podsiadlowski P., Gilmore G. F., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature02161 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.427..129M 427, 129

    2004 doi

  106. [116]

    R., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/739/2/L37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...739L..37M 739, L37

    Maund J. R., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/739/2/L37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...739L..37M 739, L37

    2011 doi

  107. [117]

    A., R \"o pke F

    Mazzali P. A., R \"o pke F. K., Benetti S., Hillebrandt W., 2007, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1136259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007Sci...315..825M 315, 825

    2007 doi

  108. [118]

    A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv761 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450.2631M 450, 2631

    Mazzali P. A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv761 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450.2631M 450, 2631

    2015 doi

  109. [119]

    McCully C., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..32M 848, L32

    2017 doi

  110. [120]

    B., Hoeflich P., Diehl R., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5253 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...930..107M 930, 107

    Mera Evans T. B., Hoeflich P., Diehl R., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5253 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...930..107M 930, 107

    2022 doi

  111. [121]

    D., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16864.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.406.2650M 406, 2650

    Metzger B. D., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16864.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.406.2650M 406, 2650

    2010

  112. [122]

    D., Bauswein A., Goriely S., Kasen D., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2225 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446.1115M 446, 1115

    Metzger B. D., Bauswein A., Goriely S., Kasen D., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2225 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446.1115M 446, 1115

    2015 doi

  113. [123]

    C., Lamb F

    Miller M. C., Lamb F. K., Psaltis D., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306408 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...508..791M 508, 791

    1998 doi

  114. [124]

    A., The L

    Milne P. A., The L. S., Leising M. D., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/313262 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..124..503M 124, 503

    1999 doi

  115. [125]

    Modjaz M., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/226 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...702..226M 702, 226

    2009 doi

  116. [126]

    M \"u ller B., 2020, @doi [Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics] 10.1007/s41115-020-0008-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020LRCA....6....3M 6, 3

    2020 doi

  117. [127]

    L., Pejcha O., Clocchiatti A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa72f1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841..127M 841, 127

    M \"u ller T., Prieto J. L., Pejcha O., Clocchiatti A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa72f1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841..127M 841, 127

    2017 doi

  118. [128]

    J., et al., 2018, in Murphy E., ed., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol

    Murphy E. J., et al., 2018, in Murphy E., ed., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 517, Science with a Next Generation Very Large Array. p. 3 ( @eprint arXiv 1810.07524 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.1810.07524

    2018 doi arXiv

  119. [129]

    Nagao T., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346715 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..11N 681, A11

    2024 doi

  120. [130]

    Nicholl M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9029 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..18N 848, L18

    2017 doi

  121. [131]

    V., Kastaun W., Mi \ n ano B., Vigan \`o D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.023013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PhRvD.106b3013P 106, 023013

    Palenzuela C., Aguilera-Miret R., Carrasco F., Ciolfi R., Kalinani J. V., Kastaun W., Mi \ n ano B., Vigan \`o D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.023013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PhRvD.106b3013P 106, 023013

    2022 doi

  122. [132]

    C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.1887P 532, 1887

    Pan Y. C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.1887P 532, 1887

    2024 doi

  123. [133]

    Pauldrach A. W. A., Vanbeveren D., Hoffmann T. L., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117621 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...538A..75P 538, A75

    2012 doi

  124. [134]

    Penney R., Hoeflich P., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/84 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...795...84P 795, 84

    2014 doi

  125. [135]

    L., Kollmeier J

    Piro A. L., Kollmeier J. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaab3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...855..103P 855, 103

    2018 doi

  126. [136]

    L., Morozova V

    Piro A. L., Morozova V. S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/96 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...826...96P 826, 96

    2016 doi

  127. [137]

    Podsiadlowski P., Hsu J. J. L., Joss P. C., Ross R. R., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1038/364509a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993Natur.364..509P 364, 509

    1993 doi

  128. [138]

    Podsiadlowski P., Langer N., Poelarends A. J. T., Rappaport S., Heger A., Pfahl E., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/421713 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...612.1044P 612, 1044

    2004 doi

  129. [139]

    V., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...414..712P 414, 712

    Popov D. V., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...414..712P 414, 712

    1993 doi

  130. [140]

    J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw299 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.2973P 458, 2973

    Prentice S. J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw299 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.2973P 458, 2973

    2016 doi

  131. [141]

    Psaltis D., Chakrabarty D., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...521..332P 521, 332

    1999 doi

  132. [142]

    D., Woosley S

    Rauscher T., Heger A., Hoffman R. D., Woosley S. E., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/341728 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...576..323R 576, 323

    2002 doi

  133. [143]

    Radiofizika, pp 921--936

    Razin V., 1960, Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii. Radiofizika, pp 921--936

    1960

  134. [144]

    K., Wickramasinghe D

    Reisenegger A., 2001, in Mathys G., Solanki S. K., Wickramasinghe D. T., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 248, Magnetic Fields Across the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram. p. 469 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0103010 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0103010

    2001 doi arXiv

  135. [145]

    R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19892.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.419.2433R 419, 2433

    Reville B., Bell A. R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19892.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.419.2433R 419, 2433

    2012

  136. [146]

    A., Spitkovsky A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/63 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...733...63R 733, 63

    Riquelme M. A., Spitkovsky A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/63 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...733...63R 733, 63

    2011 doi

  137. [147]

    S., Neustadt J

    Rizzo Smith M., Kochanek C. S., Neustadt J. M. M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1483 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.1474R 523, 1474

    2023 doi

  138. [148]

    T., Drake J

    Roberg-Clark G. T., Drake J. F., Swisdak M., Reynolds C. S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae393 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...867..154R 867, 154

    2018 doi

  139. [149]

    F., Kasen D., Lee W

    Roberts L. F., Kasen D., Lee W. H., Ramirez-Ruiz E., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/736/1/L21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...736L..21R 736, L21

    2011 doi

  140. [150]

    J., 2020, @doi [IAU Symposium] 10.1017/S1743921320000587 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020IAUS..357....1R 357, 1

    Ruiter A. J., 2020, @doi [IAU Symposium] 10.1017/S1743921320000587 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020IAUS..357....1R 357, 1

    2020 doi

  141. [151]

    A., Pian E., Nomoto K., Hachinger S., Cappellaro E., Benetti S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1777 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445..711S 445, 711

    Sasdelli M., Mazzali P. A., Pian E., Nomoto K., Hachinger S., Cappellaro E., Benetti S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1777 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445..711S 445, 711

    2014 doi

  142. [152]

    Saumon D., Blouin S., Tremblay P.-E., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PhR...988....1S 988, 1

    2022 doi

  143. [153]

    A., Ruiter A

    Scalzo R. A., Ruiter A. J., Sim S. A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1808 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.2535S 445, 2535

    2014 doi

  144. [154]

    A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3178 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483..628S 483, 628

    Scalzo R. A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3178 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483..628S 483, 628

    2019 doi

  145. [155]

    D., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377476 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...595.1101S 595, 1101

    Schmidt G. D., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377476 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...595.1101S 595, 1101

    2003 doi

  146. [156]

    Schroer B., Pezzi O., Caprioli D., Haggerty C., Blasi P., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac02cd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...914L..13S 914, L13

    2021 doi

  147. [157]

    R., Taubenberger S., Sim S

    Seitenzahl I. R., Taubenberger S., Sim S. A., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15478.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.400..531S 400, 531

    2009

  148. [158]

    R., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts402 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429.1156S 429, 1156

    Seitenzahl I. R., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts402 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429.1156S 429, 1156

    2013 doi

  149. [159]

    R., Timmes F

    Seitenzahl I. R., Timmes F. X., Magkotsios G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/10 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792...10S 792, 10

    2014 doi

  150. [160]

    J., Stanek K

    Shappee B. J., Stanek K. Z., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...733..124S 733, 124

    2011 doi

  151. [161]

    J., et al., 2017a, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aaq0186 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...358.1574S 358, 1574

    Shappee B. J., et al., 2017a, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aaq0186 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...358.1574S 358, 1574

    doi

  152. [162]

    J., Stanek K

    Shappee B. J., Stanek K. Z., Kochanek C. S., Garnavich P. M., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6eab , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841...48S 841, 48

    doi

  153. [163]

    272, Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits

    Shultz M., et al., 2011, in Neiner C., Wade G., Meynet G., Peters G., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 272, Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits. pp 212--213 ( @eprint arXiv 1009.2516 ), @doi 10.1017/S1743921311010398

    2011 arXiv

  154. [164]

    M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467..369S 467, 369

    Silverman J. M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467..369S 467, 369

    2017 doi

  155. [165]

    Sironi L., Spitkovsky A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/726/2/75 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...726...75S 726, 75

    2011 doi

  156. [166]

    Sironi L., Spitkovsky A., Arons J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/771/1/54 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...771...54S 771, 54

    2013 doi

  157. [167]

    J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101737 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47...63S 47, 63

    Smartt S. J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101737 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47...63S 47, 63

    2009 doi

  158. [168]

    J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2015.17 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASA...32...16S 32, e016

    Smartt S. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2015.17 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASA...32...16S 32, e016

    2015 doi

  159. [169]

    J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature24303 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.551...75S 551, 75

    Smartt S. J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature24303 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.551...75S 551, 75

    2017 doi

  160. [170]

    H., Ryde N., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/137/3/3558 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....137.3558S 137, 3558

    Smith N., Hinkle K. H., Ryde N., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/137/3/3558 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....137.3558S 137, 3558

    2009 doi

  161. [171]

    Soares-Santos M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9059 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..16S 848, L16

    2017 doi

  162. [172]

    801, Astrophysical Sources of High Energy Particles and Radiation

    Spitkovsky A., 2005, in Bulik T., Rudak B., Madejski G., eds, American Institute of Physics Conference Series Vol. 801, Astrophysical Sources of High Energy Particles and Radiation. pp 345--350 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0603211 ), @doi 10.1063/1.2141897

    2005 arXiv

  163. [173]

    W., Lattimer J

    Steiner A. W., Lattimer J. M., Brown E. F., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/765/1/L5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...765L...5S 765, L5

    2013 doi

  164. [174]

    Stritzinger M., Sollerman J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066999 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...470L...1S 470, L1

    2007 doi

  165. [175]

    Svensson R., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...258..321S 258, 321

    1982 doi

  166. [176]

    Taddia F., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730844 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...609A.136T 609, A136

    2018 doi

  167. [177]

    Tanaka M., Hotokezaka K., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...775..113T 775, 113

    2013 doi

  168. [178]

    Tanaka M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psx121 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017PASJ...69..102T 69, 102

    2017 doi

  169. [179]

    R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa90b6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..27T 848, L27

    Tanvir N. R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa90b6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..27T 848, L27

    2017 doi

  170. [180]

    Tessore B., L \`e bre A., Morin J., Mathias P., Josselin E., Auri \`e re M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730473 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...603A.129T 603, A129

    2017 doi

  171. [181]

    Thielemann F.-K., Nomoto K., Hashimoto M.-A., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176980 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...460..408T 460, 408

    1996 doi

  172. [182]

    B., Shen K., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.3703T 515, 3703

    Tiwari V., Graur O., Fisher R., Seitenzahl I., Leung S.-C., Nomoto K., Perets H. B., Shen K., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.3703T 515, 3703

    2022 doi

  173. [183]

    E., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2854 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.2849T 465, 2849

    Tremblay P. E., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2854 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.2849T 465, 2849

    2017 doi

  174. [184]

    A., Shappee B

    Tucker M. A., Shappee B. J., Kochanek C. S., Stanek K. Z., Ashall C., Anand G. S., Garnavich P., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.4119T 517, 4119

    2022 doi

  175. [185]

    P., 2004, @doi [Astronomy Letters] 10.1134/1.1738152 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AstL...30..293U 30, 293

    Utrobin V. P., 2004, @doi [Astronomy Letters] 10.1134/1.1738152 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AstL...30..293U 30, 293

    2004 doi

  176. [186]

    D., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/741/2/L28 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741L..28V 741, L28

    Van Dyk S. D., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/741/2/L28 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741L..28V 741, L28

    2011 doi

  177. [187]

    D., et al., 2012a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/143/1/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....143...19V 143, 19

    Van Dyk S. D., et al., 2012a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/143/1/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....143...19V 143, 19

    doi

  178. [188]

    D., et al., 2012b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/131 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...756..131V 756, 131

    Van Dyk S. D., et al., 2012b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/131 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...756..131V 756, 131

    doi

  179. [189]

    D., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/147/2/37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....147...37V 147, 37

    Van Dyk S. D., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/147/2/37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....147...37V 147, 37

    2014 doi

  180. [190]

    S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acf1a3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...955L..37V 955, L37

    Vasylyev S. S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acf1a3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...955L..37V 955, L37

    2023 doi

  181. [191]

    A., 1961, Many-particle theory and its application to plasma

    Vlasov A. A., 1961, Many-particle theory and its application to plasma

    1961

  182. [192]

    S., 1959, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.2.83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959PhRvL...2...83W 2, 83

    Weibel E. S., 1959, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.2.83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959PhRvL...2...83W 2, 83

    1959 doi

  183. [193]

    Wellstein S., Langer N., 1999, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...350..148W 350, 148

    1999

  184. [194]

    Wellstein S., Langer N., Braun H., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010151 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...369..939W 369, 939

    2001 doi

  185. [195]

    D., Hillier D

    Wilk K. D., Hillier D. J., Dessart L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa640 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.2221W 494, 2221

    2020 doi

  186. [196]

    E., Weaver T

    Woosley S. E., Weaver T. A., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.24.090186.001225 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ARA&A..24..205W 24, 205

    1986

  187. [197]

    E., Weaver T

    Woosley S. E., Weaver T. A., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192237 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJS..101..181W 101, 181

    1995 doi

  188. [198]

    E., Langer N., Weaver T

    Woosley S. E., Langer N., Weaver T. A., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/175963 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...448..315W 448, 315

    1995 doi

  189. [199]

    E., Heger A., Weaver T

    Woosley S. E., Heger A., Weaver T. A., 2002, @doi [Reviews of Modern Physics] 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.1015 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002RvMP...74.1015W 74, 1015

    2002 doi

  190. [200]

    Yoon S.-C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1496 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.3970Y 470, 3970

    2017 doi

  191. [201]

    C., Gr \"a fener G., Vink J

    Yoon S. C., Gr \"a fener G., Vink J. S., Kozyreva A., Izzard R. G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219790 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...544L..11Y 544, L11

    2012 doi

  192. [202]

    D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3191 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.5325Z 499, 5325

    Zhang K. D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3191 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.5325Z 499, 5325

    2020 doi

  193. [203]

    de la Chevroti \`e re A., St-Louis N., Moffat A. F. J., MiMeS Collaboration 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/781/2/73 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...781...73D 781, 73

    2014 doi

  194. [204]

    P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A...2V 556, A2

    van Haarlem M. P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A...2V 556, A2

    2013 doi

  195. [205]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.