Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 161 references

Brazilian Report on Dark Matter 2024

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This white paper argues that Brazil's dark matter community has grown and consolidated, moving from a few researchers to participation in flagship experiments across every major detection frontier, and that continued funding is needed to…

desk verdict A competent community white paper whose growth claim overreaches its own bibliometric evidence, but the participation record holds up. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16228 v2 pith:ZNL23WCP submitted 2025-04-22 hep-ph astro-ph.HEhep-ex

I. F. M. Albuquerque , J. Alcaniz , A. Alves , J. Amaral , C. Bonifazi , H. A. Borges , S. Carneiro , L. Casarini
show 46 more authors
D. Cogollo A. G. Dias G. C. Dorsch A. Esmaili G. Gil da Silveira C. Gobel V. P. Gonçalves A. S. Jesus D. Hadjimichef P. C. de Holanda R.F.L. Holanda E. Kemp A. Lessa A. Machado M.V T. Machado M. Makler V. Marra M. S. Mateus Junior R. D. Matheus P. G. Mercadante A. A. Nepomuceno R.M.P. Neves C. Nishi Y.M. Oviedo-Torres N. Pinto C. A. Pires E. Polycarpo F. S. Queiroz T. Quirino M. S. Rangel P. Rebello Teles D. C. Rodrigues J. G. Rodrigues P. S. Rodrigues da Silva R. Rosenfeld B. L. Sanchez-Vega E. Segretto R. Silva D. R. da Silva C. Siqueira V. de Souza S. Fonseca De Souza T. R. F. P. Tomei G. A. Valdiviesso A. Viana Y. Villamizar
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.HEhep-ex PACS 95.35.+d
keywords darkmattersectorBraziliancommunitywhitepaperdirectdetectionindirectcollidersearchesCONNIE
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Prepared for Brazil's national high-energy physics strategy planning, this white paper aims to establish one fact: the Brazilian dark matter and dark sector community has grown and consolidated over the past four years, moving from a handful of researchers in a few experiments to participation in major international efforts across direct detection, indirect detection, colliders, neutrino physics, and cosmology. The paper presents this breadth as evidence that the community is a durable partner in the global dark matter program, and it argues that sustained financial support is needed to maintain the Brazilian presence. A sympathetic reader should take the report as a collective declaration of capacity: the same groups that produced DarkSide-50 low-mass dark matter analyses now sit inside the next generation of detection experiments. The paper itself notes that its quantitative growth plot is not meant to be rigorous, which defines the strength of the claim the evidence can carry.

What carries the argument

The report's organizing device is the standard dark matter complementarity of detection strategies — direct, indirect, collider, plus neutrino and cosmological probes — which lets the paper present many separate collaborations as one coherent portfolio. The load-bearing quantitative evidence is the bibliometric count in FIG. 5, a Google Scholar tally of theses and papers with Brazilian affiliation compiled on July 22, 2024, together with the experiment map in FIG. 1 that pairs each collaboration with its Brazilian participant institutions or universities.

What would settle it

A reproducible bibliometric check—counting distinct dark matter and dark sector papers and theses with disambiguated Brazilian affiliations, year by year from 2011 to 2024, using curated bibliographic databases—would settle whether the upward trend in FIG. 5 is real; if the curated counts are flat or shrinking in the last four years, the claim that the community has demonstrably grown fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the Brazilian community devoted to dark matter and dark sector physics has grown and consolidated since the 2019 community report, and is now embedded in large-scale, long-term international collaborations across all detection frontiers: direct detection (DarkSide-20k, CYGNO, Oscura), indirect detection (CTAO, SWGO), collider and accelerator searches (ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, HL-LHC, FCC, neutron-conversion experiments), neutrino physics (CONNIE, SBND, DUNE), and cosmology and astrophysics (DES, J-PAS, BINGO, LSST, LISA, Einstein Telescope). The growth is evidenced by a count of theses and articles with Brazilian affiliation rising over 2011–2024, and by a comparison of the number of experiments with Brazilian involvement between the 2019 and the present report. On this basis the paper argues that the community warrants sustained financial support to maintain its role in the global search for dark matter particles.

Load-bearing premise

The claim of demonstrated growth rests on an undisclosed Google Scholar count that the authors themselves disclaim as not rigorous; if that count's affiliation filter or deduplication is unreliable, the quantitative evidence of growth collapses and the report is left with anecdote.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the report is right, the Brazilian dark matter community spans every major detection strategy, making it a broad rather than niche partner for international collaborations.
  • The named future program — DarkSide-20k, CYGNO, Oscura, CTAO, SWGO, CONNIE upgrades, HL-LHC and FCC — would keep Brazilian groups active in next-generation facilities for at least a decade.
  • The theory program's stated connection to experiment (relic density calculations, long-lived particle searches, gamma-ray constraints, beam-dump proposals) supplies the physics case that justifies the experimental commitments.
  • Continued funding of the listed collaborations is the direct policy conclusion the report draws from its account of growth and consolidation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The report's own disclaimer that its count is not rigorous suggests the strategy process should commission a reproducible bibliometric baseline before treating the growth figure as firm evidence.
  • Membership in large collaborations like ATLAS, CMS, or LISA does not by itself measure physics output; a natural extension would be to count actual papers and leadership roles of Brazilian authors within each collaboration.
  • The increase in dark matter theses and articles may partly parallel a general growth in the country's physics output, so normalizing the count to all Brazilian high-energy and astroparticle publications would isolate the dark-sector specialization.
  • The Brazilian synchrotron and FCC proposals indicate the community is already looking beyond current facilities; a testable prediction is that, with funding, these proposals become concrete experimental programs with named deliverables.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This white paper, submitted to the proceedings of the II HECAP Strategy Plan, surveys the activities of the Brazilian dark matter and dark sector community over roughly 2019-2024. It organizes the material by detection channel: direct detection (DarkSide, CYGNO, Oscura), indirect detection (CTAO, SWGO), colliders (ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, future colliders), complementary probes (CONNIE, SBND, DUNE, DES, J-PAS, BINGO, LSST, LISA, ET), and theoretical efforts in particle physics and cosmology. The stated objective is to document growth and consolidation of the community and to argue for continued financial support for Brazilian groups in international collaborations. The central quantitative evidence for growth is Fig. 5, a Google Scholar-based count of theses and papers with Brazilian affiliation; the paper explicitly disclaims rigor in that count.

Significance. The report is a useful and largely accurate snapshot of a national community's experimental and theoretical portfolio, and it is consistent with the published literature it cites. Its strengths are the institution-level map in Fig. 1, the explicit enumeration of Brazilian roles in named collaborations (DarkSide-20k, CTAO, SWGO, CONNIE, Oscura, LHCb, and others), and the candid statement of limitations around the bibliometric count. If the growth claim is accepted, the document provides timely input for the HECAP strategy process. The weakness is that the only quantitative support for the headline claim is a non-reproducible count of works rather than people; the qualitative evidence of expanded collaboration membership is real but is less than what 'convincingly demonstrates' promises.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section II and Section VIII, Fig. 5] The sentence in Section II that 'This white paper convincingly demonstrates that the community has both grown and consolidated' is not supported by the quantitative evidence in Fig. 5. The left panel counts works (theses and papers) returned by a Google Scholar search on July 22, 2024, but the query, affiliation filter, deduplication rule, and raw counts are not provided, and the caption explicitly disclaims rigor. Growth in the number of works does not establish growth in the number of researchers, because per-capita output, collaboration size, and Google Scholar coverage can all change over time; the separate comparison of 2024-with-2014 is especially sensitive to index coverage and preprint/published duplicates. The right panel's experiment count does support an expanded experimental footprint, but the 'convincingly demonstrates' claim needs either a reproducible search protocol with person-level counts or a more modest wording that distinguishes growth in research output and collaborative footprint from growth in community size.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III.b] The text says 'We emphasize that CYGNOS represents a new addition compared to the last white paper'; the project name should be CYGNO, not CYGNOS.
  2. [Section IV.b] The final sentence of Section IV.b refers to 'the CTAO and SGWO telescopes'; the acronym should be SWGO, not SGWO.
  3. [Section III.a and Fig. 2] The text quotes a sensitivity of 7.4 x 10^-48 cm^2 for a TeV WIMP with a 200 t.yr exposure, while the right-panel legend lists curves for 500, 250, and 100 t.yr; please reconcile the quoted exposure with the figure labels or identify which curve corresponds to the quoted number.
  4. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption statement 'In July 2024, we have produced more work than the whole year of 2014' is ambiguous because the data were collected on July 22, 2024; it should read 'by July 2024' or 'in the first seven months of 2024'.
  5. [References] Some entries are incomplete, for example reference [1] gives only an arXiv identifier without a journal and reference [34] lacks a year or venue; please complete and standardize all bibliography entries to the journal's format.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the report's growth claim rests on independently checkable collaboration lists and a bibliometric figure explicitly disclaimed as non-rigorous; self-citations are descriptive, not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a community white paper rather than a derivation, so the equation-based circularity tests do not apply. The central claim that the Brazilian dark-matter community has grown and consolidated is supported by two types of evidence: (i) named participation in large international experiments (DarkSide-20k, CTAO, SWGO, ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, CONNIE, Oscura, LISA, BINGO), which is externally checkable, and (ii) FIG. 5, a Google Scholar count of theses and papers with Brazilian affiliation. The paper itself disclaims rigor for that count, stating: 'Our goal here is not to be rigorous about the precise number of experiments or works written, but to solidly show that the dark sector community is growing.' A weak or irreproducible bibliometric indicator is a correctness or evidentiary concern, not a circularity: the metric is not definitionally identical to the conclusion, since community size and publication count are distinct concepts, and the conclusion is not derived by construction from the figure alone. Self-citations, including the previous white paper [8] and papers authored by community members, are normal in a community report and are used descriptively to document activities; they do not constitute a load-bearing uniqueness argument or an imported theorem that forces the report's conclusions. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no quantity is defined in terms of the claim it is supposed to support, and no reliance on the authors' prior work substitutes for independent evidence. The report therefore exhibits no significant circularity under the stated hard-rule standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The report contributes no fitted parameters, so free_parameters is empty. The content is carried by domain assumptions inherited from the field: dark matter is non-baryonic new physics satisfying the Section I criteria, the cited projections and limits are taken at face value, and the SM plus Lambda-CDM backgrounds are assumed. No entities are invented here; candidates such as WIMPs, axions, dark photons, millicharged particles, and primordial black holes are surveyed from prior literature.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Dark matter consists of one or more new particles not contained in the Standard Model.
    Section I opens with this premise and the entire report is organized around it. It is the standard paradigm of the field, but it remains unproven and is not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption Dark matter must be stable, must yield the correct relic density, must be non-relativistic at matter-radiation equality, and must be effectively neutral.
    Section I lists these as the four requirements any dark matter candidate should fulfill, adopted without derivation or citation at the point of use.
  • domain assumption More than 80% of the matter in the universe is non-baryonic dark matter.
    Section I asserts this without a direct citation at the point of use; only review [1] is referenced nearby.
  • domain assumption The cited experimental sensitivities and constraints (DarkSide-20k, CTAO, SWGO, LHC searches, CONNIE limits) are reliable as published.
    The report's characterizations of discovery potential rest on sensitivity projections and limits taken from the cited literature (e.g., refs [9, 23, 24, 69]) without independent verification.
  • standard math Standard Model physics and the standard cosmological model provide the correct backgrounds for interpreting the cited results.
    Every constraint and projection invoked in the report assumes SM backgrounds and the Lambda-CDM framework; this is standard physics background, not introduced by the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Brazilian Report on Dark Matter 2024." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZNL23WCP

@misc{pith2026250416228,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Brazilian Report on Dark Matter 2024},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZNL23WCP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16228}
}
read the original abstract

One of the key scientific objectives for the next decade is to uncover the nature of dark matter (DM). We should continue prioritizing targets such as weakly-interacting massive particles (WIMPs), Axions, and other low-mass dark matter candidates to improve our chances of achieving it. A varied and ongoing portfolio of experiments spanning different scales and detection methods is essential to maximize our chances of discovering its composition. This report paper provides an updated overview of the Brazilian community's activities in dark matter and dark sector physics over the past years with a view for the future. It underscores the ongoing need for financial support for Brazilian groups actively engaged in experimental research to sustain the Brazilian involvement in the global search for dark matter particles

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.16228 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Map of the Brazilian involvement in dark matter and dark sector physics. Current detectors are delimited with solid lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Current and Projected sensitivity of the DarkSide experiment on the dark matter–nucleon spin-independent scattering cross [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Projected limits on the dark matter annihilation into [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Upper limits on the charge of milicharged particles, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. On the left, we show a summary plot with the number of works (thesis + papers) related to dark matter and dark sectors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

161 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Arcadi, D

    G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y . Mambrini, J. P. Neto, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, The Waning of the WIMP: Endgame?, 2403.15860

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Billard et

    J. Billard et. al., Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*, Rept. Prog. Phys. 85 (2022), no. 5 056201, [2104.07634]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    DarkSide-20k Collaboration, C. E. Aalseth et. al., DarkSide-20k: A 20 tonne two-phase LAr TPC for direct dark matter detection at LNGS, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133 (2018) 131, [1707.08145]

    arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Agnes et

    DarkSide Collaboration, P. Agnes et. al., DarkSide-50 532-day Dark Matter Search with Low-Radioactivity Argon, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 10 102006, [1802.07198]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Agnes et

    DarkSide Collaboration, P. Agnes et. al., Low-Mass Dark Matter Search with the DarkSide-50 Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018), no. 8 081307, [1802.06994]

    arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Agnes et

    DarkSide Collaboration, P. Agnes et. al., Search for Dark Matter Particle Interactions with Electron Final States with DarkSide-50, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023), no. 10 101002, [2207.11968]

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Agnes et

    DarkSide-50 Collaboration, P. Agnes et. al., Search for low-mass dark matter WIMPs with 12 ton-day exposure of DarkSide-50, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 6 063001, [2207.11966]. 11 Report of the Brazilian Community on Dark Matter 2024

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Abdalla et

    E. Abdalla et. al., Brazilian Community Report on Dark Matter, 1912.10076

    arXiv 1912

Show all 161 references
  1. [9]

    Agnes, Direct Detection of Dark Matter with DarkSide-20k, EPJ Web Conf

    DarkSide Collaboration, P. Agnes, Direct Detection of Dark Matter with DarkSide-20k, EPJ Web Conf. 280 (2023) 06003

    2023

  2. [10]

    Agnes et

    DarkSide Collaboration, P. Agnes et. al., Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark-Matter–Electron Scattering from the DarkSide-50 Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018), no. 11 111303, [1802.06998]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Agnes et

    DarkSide Collaboration, P. Agnes et. al., Search for Dark-Matter–Nucleon Interactions via Migdal Effect with DarkSide-50, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023), no. 10 101001, [2207.11967]

    2023

  4. [12]

    F. D. Amaro et. al., The CYGNO/INITIUM experiment, SciPost Phys. Proc. 12 (2023) 019

    2023

  5. [13]

    F. D. Amaro et. al., The CYGNO experiment, a directional detector with optical readout for Dark Matter search, Nuovo Cim. C 47 (2024), no. 3 126

    2024

  6. [14]

    F. D. Amaro et. al., Secondary scintillation yield from GEM electron avalanches in He-CF4 and He-CF4-isobutane for CYGNO — Directional Dark Matter search with an optical TPC, Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138759

    2024

  7. [15]

    With newly available multiplexing electronics, CONNIE can host several such modules

    experiment (and first MCM operating in a working experiment), increasing its mass in skipper CCDs by a factor close to 30. With newly available multiplexing electronics, CONNIE can host several such modules. Therefore, we expect improved constraints on dark sectors. In additio...

    2024

  8. [16]

    Aguilar-Arevalo et

    Oscura Collaboration, A. Aguilar-Arevalo et. al., The Oscura Experiment, 2202.10518

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Tiffenberg, M

    SENSEI Collaboration, J. Tiffenberg, M. Sofo-Haro, A. Drlica-Wagner, R. Essig, Y . Guardincerri, S. Holland, T. V olansky, and T.-T. Yu,Single-electron and single-photon sensitivity with a silicon Skipper CCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), no. 13 131802, [1706.00028]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Perez et

    Oscura Collaboration, S. Perez et. al., Searching for millicharged particles with 1 kg of Skipper-CCDs using the NuMI beam at Fermilab, JHEP 02 (2024) 072, [2304.08625]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Adari et

    SENSEI Collaboration, P. Adari et. al., SENSEI: First Direct-Detection Results on sub-GeV Dark Matter from SENSEI at SNOLAB, 2312.13342

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    CTA Consortium Collaboration, B. S. Acharya et. al., Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array. WSP, 11, 2018

    2018

  13. [21]

    Cherenkov Telescope Array Collaboration, S. Abe et. al., Dark Matter Line Searches with the Cherenkov Telescope Array, 2403.04857

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Bal ´azs, J

    C. Bal ´azs, J. Conrad, B. Farmer, T. Jacques, T. Li, M. Meyer, F. S. Queiroz, and M. A. S´anchez-Conde, Sensitivity of the Cherenkov Telescope Array to the detection of a dark matter signal in comparison to direct detection and collider experiments, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no...

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Albert et

    HA WCCollaboration, A. Albert et. al., An optimized search for dark matter in the galactic halo with HAWC, JCAP 12 (2023) 038, [2305.09861]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Viana, H

    A. Viana, H. Schoorlemmer, A. Albert, V . de Souza, J. P. Harding, and J. Hinton,Searching for Dark Matter in the Galactic Halo with a Wide Field of View TeV Gamma-ray Observatory in the Southern Hemisphere, JCAP 12 (2019) 061, [1906.03353]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    G. N. Fortes, F. S. Queiroz, C. Siqueira, and A. Viana, Present and future constraints on secluded dark matter in the Galactic Halo with TeV Gamma-ray observatories, JCAP 07 (2023) 043, [2212.05075]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Abercrombie et

    D. Abercrombie et. al., Dark Matter benchmark models for early LHC Run-2 Searches: Report of the ATLAS/CMS Dark Matter Forum, Phys. Dark Univ. 27 (2020) 100371, [1507.00966]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Boveia et

    A. Boveia et. al., Recommendations on presenting LHC searches for missing transverse energy signals using simplified s-channel models of dark matter, Phys. Dark Univ. 27 (2020) 100365, [1603.04156]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Albert et

    A. Albert et. al., Recommendations of the LHC Dark Matter Working Group: Comparing LHC searches for dark matter mediators in visible and invisible decay channels and calculations of the thermal relic density, Phys. Dark Univ. 26 (2019) 100377, [1703.05703]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Hayrapetyan et

    CMS Collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et. al., Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2, JINST 19 (2024), no. 11 P11021, [2410.17038]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Hayrapetyan et

    CMS Collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et. al., Enriching the Physics Program of the CMS Experiment via Data Scouting and Data Parking, 2403.16134

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et. al., Search for resonant production of dark quarks in the dijet final state with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 02 (2024) 128, [2311.03944]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et. al., Search for dark photons in rareZ boson decays with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023), no. 25 251801, [2306.07413]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et. al., Constraints on dark matter models involving ans-channel mediator with the ATLAS detector inpp collisions at √s = 13 TeV, 2404.15930

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et. al., Combination of searches for Higgs boson decays into a photon and a massless dark photon usingpp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, 2406.01656

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    J. V . Da Fonseca Pinto, M. Verissimo De Araujo, W. Spolidoro Freund, C. Meyer, J. Seixas, and D. Oliveira Damazio, NeuralRinger: An Ensemble of Neural Networks Fed from Calorimeter Ring Sums for Triggering on Electrons,

  28. [36]

    W. Spolidoro Freund and on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration, An ensemble of neural networks for online electron filtering at the ATLAS experiment, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1525 (Apr, 2020) 012076

    2020

  29. [37]

    Tumasyan et

    CMS Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et. al., Search for new particles in events with energetic jets and large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP 11 (2021) 153, [2107.13021]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et. al., Search for dark matter produced in association with a leptonically decaying Z boson in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021), no. 1 13, [2008.04735]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 81, 333 (2021)]. 12 Report of th...

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et. al., Search for dark matter produced in association with a single top quark or a top quark pair in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP 03 (2019) 141, [1901.01553]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et. al., Search for dark matter particles produced in association with a Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP 03 (2020) 025, [1908.01713]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Tumasyan et

    CMS Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et. al., A search for decays of the Higgs boson to invisible particles in events with a top-antitop quark pair or a vector boson in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023), no. 10 933, [2303.01214]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et. al., Search for high mass dijet resonances with a new background prediction method in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP 05 (2020) 033, [1911.03947]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Hayrapetyan et

    CMS Collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et. al., Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment, 2405.13778

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et. al., Search for massive long-lived particles decaying semileptonically in the LHCb detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017), no. 4 224, [1612.00945]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et. al., Search for Dark Photons Produced in 13 TeVpp Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), no. 6 061801, [1710.02867]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [46]

    A. B. Rodr ´ıguez, V . Chobanova, X. Cid Vidal, S. L. Soli˜no, D. M. Santos, T. Momb¨acher, C. Prouv´e, E. X. R. Fern´andez, and C. V´azquez Sierra, Prospects on searches for baryonic Dark Matter produced in b-hadron decays at LHCb, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021), no. 11 964, [2106.12870]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Ilten, J

    P. Ilten, J. Thaler, M. Williams, and W. Xue, Dark photons from charm mesons at LHCb, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 11 115017, [1509.06765]

    2015 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Ilten, Y

    P. Ilten, Y . Soreq, J. Thaler, M. Williams, and W. Xue,Proposed Inclusive Dark Photon Search at LHCb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 25 251803, [1603.08926]

    2016 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Craik, P

    D. Craik, P. Ilten, D. Johnson, and M. Williams, LHCb future dark-sector sensitivity projections for Snowmass 2021, in Snowmass 2021, 3, 2022. 2203.07048

    2021 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Alimena et

    J. Alimena et. al., Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider, J. Phys. G 47 (2020), no. 9 090501, [1903.04497]

    2020

  43. [51]

    Cid Vidal et

    X. Cid Vidal et. al., Report from Working Group 3: Beyond the Standard Model physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.7 (2019) 585–865, [1812.07831]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Agostini et

    LHeC, FCC-he Study Group Collaboration, P. Agostini et. al., The Large Hadron–Electron Collider at the HL-LHC, J. Phys. G 48 (2021), no. 11 110501, [2007.14491]

    2021

  45. [53]

    D’Onofrio, O

    M. D’Onofrio, O. Fischer, and Z. S. Wang, Searching for Dark Photons at the LHeC and FCC-he, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 1 015020, [1909.02312]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Huang, S

    G.-y. Huang, S. Jana, A. S. de Jesus, F. S. Queiroz, and W. Rodejohann, Search for leptophilic dark matter at the LHeC, J. Phys. G 50 (2023), no. 6 065001, [2207.01656]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Abada et

    FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et. al., FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 (2019), no. 2 261–623

    2019

  48. [56]

    Abada et

    FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et. al., FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3, Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 (2019), no. 4 755–1107

    2019

  49. [57]

    Abada et

    FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et. al., FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019), no. 6 474

    2019

  50. [58]

    Rebello Teles, D

    P. Rebello Teles, D. d’Enterria, V . P. Gonc ¸alves, and D. E. Martins,Searches for axionlike particles viaγγ fusion at future e+e- colliders, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 5 055003, [2310.17270]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Duarte, L

    L. Duarte, L. Lin, M. Lindner, V . Kozhuharov, S. V . Kuleshov, A. S. de Jesus, F. S. Queiroz, Y . Villamizar, and H. Westfahl, Search for dark sector by repurposing the UVX Brazilian synchrotron, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023), no. 6 514, [2206.05305]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Angel et

    L. Angel et. al., Toward a search for axionlike particles at the LNLS, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 5 055030, [2305.13384]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Abele et

    H. Abele et. al., Particle Physics at the European Spallation Source, Phys. Rept. 1023 (2023) 1–84, [2211.10396]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Burgman, The HIBEAM Experiment †, Particles 8 (2025), no

    HIBEAM, NNBAR Collaboration, A. Burgman, The HIBEAM Experiment †, Particles 8 (2025), no. 1 6, [2412.15933]

    2025 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Santoroet

    V . Santoroet. al., HighNESS conceptual design report: Volume II. The NNBAR experiment., J. Neutron Res. 25 (2024), no. 3-4 315–406

    2024

  56. [64]

    CONNIE Collaboration, A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et. al., Exploring low-energy neutrino physics with the Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Interaction Experiment, Phys. Rev. D 100 (Nov., 2019) 092005, [1906.02200]

    2019 arXiv

  57. [65]

    CONNIE Collaboration, A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et. al., Search for coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering at a nuclear reactor with CONNIE 2019 data, Journal of High Energy Physics 2022 (May, 2022) 17, [2110.13033]

    2019 arXiv

  58. [66]

    CONNIE Collaboration, A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et. al., Search for light mediators in the low-energy data of the CONNIE reactor neutrino experiment, Journal of High Energy Physics 2020 (Apr., 2020) 54, [1910.04951]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Akimov et

    COHERENT Collaboration, D. Akimov et. al., First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering on Argon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021), no. 1 012002, [2003.10630]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Adamski et

    S. Adamski et. al., First detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on germanium, 2406.13806

  61. [69]

    CONNIE Collaboration, A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et. al., Searches for CEνNS and Physics beyond the Standard Model using Skipper-CCDs at CONNIE, 2403.15976. 13 Report of the Brazilian Community on Dark Matter 2024

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    CONNIE, Atucha-II Collaboration, A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et. al., Search for reactor-produced millicharged particles with Skipper-CCDs at the CONNIE and Atucha-II experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (Feb, 2025) 071801, [2405.16316]

    2025 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Barak et

    SENSEI Collaboration, L. Barak et. al., SENSEI: Search for Millicharged Particles produced in the NuMI Beam, 2305.04964

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    P. A. Machado, O. Palamara, and D. W. Schmitz, The Short-Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 (2019) 363–387, [1903.04608]

    2019 arXiv

  65. [73]

    G. F. S. Alves, P. A. N. Machado, and R. Z. Funchal, Could SBND-PRISM probe Lepton Flavor Violation?, 2405.00777

    arXiv

  66. [74]

    Balasubramanian, Beyond the Standard Model New Physics Searches with SBND, Phys

    SBND Collaboration, S. Balasubramanian, Beyond the Standard Model New Physics Searches with SBND, Phys. Sci. Forum 8 (2023), no. 1 68

    2023

  67. [75]

    J. F. Acevedo, J. Berger, and P. B. Denton, Dark Matter Raining on DUNE and Other Large Volume Detectors, 2407.01670

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    Huang and Y

    J. Huang and Y . Zhao,Dark Matter Induced Nucleon Decay: Model and Signatures, JHEP 02 (2014) 077, [1312.0011]

    2014 arXiv

  69. [77]

    De Romeri, K

    V . De Romeri, K. J. Kelly, and P. A. N. Machado,DUNE-PRISM Sensitivity to Light Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 9 095010, [1903.10505]

    2019 arXiv

  70. [78]

    K. J. Kelly and Y . Zhang,Mononeutrino at DUNE: New Signals from Neutrinophilic Thermal Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 5 055034, [1901.01259]

    2019 arXiv

  71. [79]

    De Romeri, P

    V . De Romeri, P. Mart´ınez-Mirav´e, and M. T´ortola, Signatures of primordial black hole dark matter at DUNE and THEIA, JCAP 10 (2021) 051, [2106.05013]

    2021 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Singh et

    DES, SPT Collaboration, A. Singh et. al., Galaxy cluster matter profiles: I. Self-similarity and mass calibration, 2407.10961

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Bigwood et

    DES Collaboration, L. Bigwood et. al., Weak lensing combined with the kinetic Sunyaev Zel’dovich effect: A study of baryonic feedback, 2404.06098

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    DES Collaboration, P. Shah et. al., The dark energy survey: detection of weak lensing magnification of supernovae and constraints on dark matter haloes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 532 (2024), no. 1 932–944, [2406.05047]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Benitez et

    J-PAS Collaboration, N. Benitez et. al., J-PAS: The Javalambre-Physics of the Accelerated Universe Astrophysical Survey, 1403.5237

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Salzanoet

    V . Salzanoet. al., J-PAS: forecasts on interacting vacuum energy models, JCAP 09 (2021) 033, [2102.06417]

    2021 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Figueruelo et

    D. Figueruelo et. al., J-PAS: Forecasts for dark matter - dark energy elastic couplings, JCAP 07 (2021) 022, [2103.01571]

    2021 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Abdalla et

    E. Abdalla et. al., The BINGO project - I. Baryon acoustic oscillations from integrated neutral gas observations, Astron. Astrophys. 664 (2022) A14, [2107.01633]

    2022 arXiv

  79. [87]

    A. A. Costa et. al., The BINGO project - VII. Cosmological forecasts from 21 cm intensity mapping, Astron. Astrophys. 664 (2022) A20, [2107.01639]

    2022 arXiv

  80. [88]

    C. P. Novaes et. al., The BINGO project - VIII. Recovering the BAO signal in HI intensity mapping simulations, Astron. Astrophys. 666 (2022) A83, [2207.12125]

    2022 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Drlica-Wagner et

    LSST Dark Matter Group Collaboration, A. Drlica-Wagner et. al., Probing the Fundamental Nature of Dark Matter with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, 1902.01055

    1902 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Lochner et

    LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration, M. Lochner et. al., The Impact of Observing Strategy on Cosmological Constraints with LSST, Astrophys. J. Supp. 259 (2022), no. 2 58, [2104.05676]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [91]

    ˇSarˇcevi´c, C

    LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration, N. ˇSarˇcevi´c, C. D. Leonard, and M. M. Rau, Joint Modelling of Astrophysical Systematics for Cosmology with LSST, 2406.03352

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    Y .-Y . Maoet. al., Snowmass2021: Vera C. Rubin Observatory as a Flagship Dark Matter Experiment, 2203.07252

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    Bertone et

    G. Bertone et. al., Gravitational wave probes of dark matter: challenges and opportunities, SciPost Phys. Core 3 (2020) 007, [1907.10610]

    2020 arXiv

  86. [94]

    LISA Collaboration, K. G. Arun et. al., New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA, Living Rev. Rel. 25 (2022), no. 1 4, [2205.01597]

    2022 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Auclair et

    LISA Cosmology Working Group Collaboration, P. Auclair et. al., Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel. 26 (2023), no. 1 5, [2204.05434]

    2023 arXiv

  88. [96]

    S. Bird, I. Cholis, J. B. Mu ˜noz, Y . Ali-Ha¨ımoud, M. Kamionkowski, E. D. Kovetz, A. Raccanelli, and A. G. Riess, Did LIGO detect dark matter?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 20 201301, [1603.00464]

    2016 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Raidal, V

    M. Raidal, V . Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ae, Gravitational Waves from Primordial Black Hole Mergers, JCAP 09 (2017) 037, [1707.01480]

    2017 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Brito, S

    R. Brito, S. Ghosh, E. Barausse, E. Berti, V . Cardoso, I. Dvorkin, A. Klein, and P. Pani,Gravitational wave searches for ultralight bosons with LIGO and LISA, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 6 064050, [1706.06311]

    2017 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Arcadi, G

    G. Arcadi, G. C. Dorsch, J. P. Neto, F. S. Queiroz, and Y . M. Oviedo-Torres,Probing a dark sector with collider physics, direct detection, and gravitational waves, Phys. Lett. B 848 (2024) 138382, [2307.06376]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Mangano,Studies on the cooling systems of the Einstein Telescope cryogenic payloads, Nuovo Cim

    Einstein Telescope Collaboration, V . Mangano,Studies on the cooling systems of the Einstein Telescope cryogenic payloads, Nuovo Cim. C 47 (2024), no. 3 98

    2024

  93. [101]

    Badaracco, Einstein Telescope: Science and technology, Nuovo Cim

    ET Collaboration, F. Badaracco, Einstein Telescope: Science and technology, Nuovo Cim. C 47 (2024), no. 3 66

    2024

  94. [102]

    Esmaili and P

    A. Esmaili and P. D. Serpico, First implications of Tibet ASγ data for heavy dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 2 L021301, [2105.01826]. 14 Report of the Brazilian Community on Dark Matter 2024

    2021 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Bhattacharya, A

    A. Bhattacharya, A. Esmaili, S. Palomares-Ruiz, and I. Sarcevic, Update on decaying and annihilating heavy dark matter with the 6-year IceCube HESE data, JCAP 05 (2019) 051, [1903.12623]

    2019 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Acharyya et

    CTA Collaboration, A. Acharyya et. al., Sensitivity of the Cherenkov Telescope Array to a dark matter signal from the Galactic centre, JCAP 01 (2021) 057, [2007.16129]

    2021 arXiv

  97. [105]

    CTA Consortium Collaboration, K. Abe et. al., Prospects forγ-ray observations of the Perseus galaxy cluster with the Cherenkov Telescope Array, 2309.03712

    arXiv

  98. [106]

    Andrade, J

    M. Andrade, J. Fagiani, C. Siqueira, V . de Souza, and A. Viana,Prospects for the detection of Dark Matter with Long-lived Mediators in the Sun using the Southern Wide-field Gamma-ray Observatory, 2406.07489

    arXiv

  99. [107]

    Angel, G

    L. Angel, G. Gambini, L. Guedes, F. S. Queiroz, and V . de Souza,Constraining gamma-ray lines from dark matter annihilation using Fermi-LAT and H.E.S.S. data, JCAP 04 (2024) 028, [2311.17827]

    2024

  100. [108]

    Lindner, Y

    M. Lindner, Y . Mambrini, T. B. de Melo, and F. S. Queiroz,XENON1T anomaly: A light Z’ from a Two Higgs Doublet Model, Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135972, [2006.14590]

    2020 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Arcadi, M

    G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y . Mambrini, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz,The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018), no. 3 203, [1703.07364]

    2018 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Arcadi, A

    G. Arcadi, A. S. de Jesus, T. B. de Melo, F. S. Queiroz, and Y . S. Villamizar,A 2HDM for the g-2 and dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 982 (2022) 115882, [2104.04456]

    2022 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Oliveira and C

    V . Oliveira and C. A. de S. Pires,PandaX-4T limits on Z’ mass in 3-3-1LHN model, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 1 015031, [2112.03963]

    2022 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Arcadi, S

    G. Arcadi, S. Profumo, F. S. Queiroz, and C. Siqueira, Right-handed Neutrino Dark Matter, Neutrino Masses, and non-Standard Cosmology in a 2HDM, JCAP 12 (2020) 030, [2007.07920]

    2020 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Arcadi, J

    G. Arcadi, J. P. Neto, F. S. Queiroz, and C. Siqueira, Roads for right-handed neutrino dark matter: Fast expansion, standard freeze-out, and early matter domination, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 3 035016, [2108.11398]

    2022 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Barman, P

    B. Barman, P. Ghosh, F. S. Queiroz, and A. K. Saha, Scalar multiplet dark matter in a fast expanding Universe: Resurrection of the desert region, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 1 015040, [2101.10175]

    2021 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Dutra, V

    M. Dutra, V . Oliveira, C. A. de S. Pires, and F. S. Queiroz,A model for mixed warm and hot right-handed neutrino dark matter, JHEP 10 (2021) 005, [2104.14542]

    2021 arXiv

  108. [116]

    T. N. Maity and F. S. Queiroz, Detecting bosonic dark matter with neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 8 083019, [2104.02700]

    2021 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Garny, J

    M. Garny, J. Heisig, B. L ¨ulf, and S. V ogl,Coannihilation without chemical equilibrium, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 103521, [1705.09292]

    2017 arXiv

  110. [118]

    R. T. D’Agnolo, D. Pappadopulo, and J. T. Ruderman, Fourth Exception in the Calculation of Relic Abundances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 061102, [1705.08450]

    2017 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Heisig, A

    J. Heisig, A. Lessa, and L. M. D. Ramos, Probing conversion-driven freeze-out at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 1 015031, [2404.16086]

    2024 arXiv

  112. [120]

    G. G. da Silveira and M. S. Mateus, Investigation of scalar and fermion dark matter in mono-photon production at high-energy colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024), no. 2 181, [2308.03680]

    2024 arXiv

  113. [121]

    G. G. da Silveira and M. S. Mateus Jr., Resonant Production of Vector DM States Characterized by Monophoton ISR at High-Energy Colliders, Braz. J. Phys. 54 (2024), no. 5 164

    2024

  114. [122]

    C. P. Oliveira, D. Hadjimichef, and M. V . T. Machado,Compton-like dark photon production in electron–nucleus collisions, J. Phys. G 49 (2022), no. 3 035001

    2022

  115. [123]

    J. R. Alves, L. Angel, L. Guedes, R. M. P. Neves, F. S. Queiroz, D. R. da Silva, R. Silva, and Y . Villamizar,Updated Big Bang nucleosynthesis bounds on long-lived particles from dark sectors, Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138845, [2311.07688]

    2024 arXiv

  116. [124]

    J. S. Alcaniz, J. P. Neto, F. S. Queiroz, D. R. da Silva, and R. Silva, The Hubble constant troubled by dark matter in non-standard cosmologies, Sci. Rep. 12 (2022), no. 1 20113, [2211.14345]. [Erratum: Sci.Rep. 13, 209 (2023)]

    2022 arXiv

  117. [125]

    A. S. de Jesus, N. Pinto-Neto, F. S. Queiroz, J. Silk, and D. R. da Silva, The hubble rate trouble: an effective field theory of dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023), no. 3 203, [2212.13272]

    2023 arXiv

  118. [126]

    S. S. da Costa, D. R. da Silva, A. S. de Jesus, N. Pinto-Neto, and F. S. Queiroz, The H 0 trouble: confronting non-thermal dark matter and phantom cosmology with the CMB, BAO, and Type Ia supernovae data, JCAP 04 (2024) 035, [2311.07420]

    2024 arXiv

  119. [127]

    J. G. Rodrigues, V . Oliveira, R. von Marttens, C. A. d. S. Pires, and J. Alcaniz,CMB constraints on inflection-point inflation with pseudoscalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 2 023518, [2309.09842]

    2024 arXiv

  120. [128]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V . I. Zakharov,Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?, Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 493–506

    1980

  121. [129]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31 (1980) 260

    1980

  122. [130]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B 104 (1981) 199–202

    1981

  123. [131]

    A. G. Dias, J. Leite, J. W. F. Valle, and C. A. Vaquera-Araujo,Reloading the axion in a 3-3-1 setup, Phys. Lett. B 810 (2020) 135829, [2008.10650]

    2020 arXiv

  124. [132]

    A. G. Dias, J. Leite, and D. S. V . Gonc ¸alves,Axion-neutrino interplay in a gauged two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 7 075014, [2106.07518]. 15 Report of the Brazilian Community on Dark Matter 2024

    2021 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Alves and C

    A. Alves and C. H. Yamaguchi, Reconstruction of missing resonances combining nearest neighbors regressors and neural network classifiers, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022), no. 8 746, [2203.03662]

    2022 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Alves, E

    A. Alves, E. d. S. Almeida, and I. N. Mesquita, Variational autoencoders for regression: recovering fully leptonic bbW +W − in di-Higgs searches, JHEP 05 (2024) 023, [2402.10273]

    2024 arXiv

  127. [135]

    von Marttens, J

    R. von Marttens, J. E. Gonzalez, J. Alcaniz, V . Marra, and L. Casarini,Model-independent reconstruction of dark sector interactions, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 4 043515, [2011.10846]

    2021 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Benetti, H

    M. Benetti, H. Borges, C. Pigozzo, S. Carneiro, and J. Alcaniz, Dark sector interactions and the curvature of the universe in light of Planck’s 2018 data, JCAP 08 (2021) 014, [2102.10123]

    2021 arXiv

  129. [137]

    S. H. Pereira, A. M. Vicente, J. F. Jesus, and R. F. L. Holanda, Dark matter from torsion in Friedmann cosmology, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022), no. 4 356, [2202.01807]

    2022 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Z. C. Santana J ´unior, M. O. Costa, R. F. L. Holanda, and R. Silva,Interaction in the dark sector: A phenomenological approach, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 12 123542, [2405.15726]

    2024 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Wands, Duality Invariance of Cosmological Perturbation Spectra, Phys

    D. Wands, Duality Invariance of Cosmological Perturbation Spectra, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 23507, [9809062]

    1999

  132. [140]

    Peter, E

    P. Peter, E. J. C. Pinho, and N. Pinto-Neto, A Non inflationary model with scale invariant cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 023516, [hep-th/0610205]

    2007 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Novello and S

    M. Novello and S. E. P. Bergliaffa, Bouncing Cosmologies, Phys. Rept. 463 (2008) 127–213, [0802.1634]

    2008 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Pinto-Neto, Bouncing Quantum Cosmology, Universe 7 (2021), no

    N. Pinto-Neto, Bouncing Quantum Cosmology, Universe 7 (2021), no. 4 110

    2021

  135. [143]

    Capanema, A

    A. Capanema, A. Esmaeili, and A. Esmaili, Evaporating primordial black holes in gamma ray and neutrino telescopes, JCAP 12 (2021), no. 12 051, [2110.05637]

    2021 arXiv

  136. [144]

    E. J. Barroso, L. F. Dem ´etrio, S. D. P. Vitenti, and X. Ye,Primordial Black Hole Formation in a Dust Bouncing Model, 2405.00207

    arXiv

  137. [145]

    Maga ˜na, M

    J. Maga ˜na, M. San Mart´ın, J. Sureda, M. Rubio, I. Araya, and N. Padilla, Extended primordial black hole mass functions with a spike, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 520 (2023), no. 3 4276–4288, [2207.13689]

    2023 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Carneiro, P

    S. Carneiro, P. C. de Holanda, and A. Saa, Neutrino primordial Planckian black holes, Phys. Lett. B 822 (2021) 136670

    2021

  139. [147]

    H. A. Borges, I. P. R. Baranov, F. C. Sobrinho, and S. Carneiro, Remnant loop quantum black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024), no. 5 05LT01, [2310.01560]

    2024 arXiv

  140. [148]

    K. Bora, R. F. L. Holanda, and S. Desai, Probing the dark matter density evolution law with large scale structures, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021), no. 7 596, [2105.02168]

    2021 arXiv

  141. [149]

    K. Bora, R. F. L. Holanda, S. Desai, and S. H. Pereira, A test of the standard dark matter density evolution law using galaxy clusters and cosmic chronometers, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022), no. 1 17, [2106.15805]

    2022 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Z. C. Santana, R. F. L. Holanda, and R. Silva, Non-Parametric Analysis for the Dark Matter Density Evolution, 2308.05165

    arXiv

  143. [151]

    R. F. L. Holanda, R. S. Gonc ¸alves, J. E. Gonzalez, and J. S. Alcaniz,An estimate of the dark matter density from galaxy clusters and supernovae data, JCAP 11 (2019) 032, [1905.09689]

    2019 arXiv

  144. [152]

    von Marttens, L

    R. von Marttens, L. Casarini, N. R. Napolitano, S. Wu, V . Amaro, R. Li, C. Tortora, A. Canabarro, and Y . Wang,Inferring galaxy dark halo properties from visible matter with machine learning, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 516 (2022), no. 3 3924–3943, [2111.01185]

    2022 arXiv

  145. [153]

    S. Wu, N. R. Napolitano, C. Tortora, R. von Marttens, L. Casarini, R. Li, and W. Lin, Total and dark mass from observations of galaxy centers with Machine Learning, Astron. Astrophys. 686 (2024) A80, [2310.02816]

    2024

  146. [154]

    Steigerwald, D

    H. Steigerwald, D. Rodrigues, S. Profumo, and V . Marra,Type Ia supernova magnitude step from the local dark matter environment, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 510 (2022), no. 4 4779–4795, [2112.09739]

    2022 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Steigerwald and E

    H. Steigerwald and E. Tejeda, Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton Accretion in a Reactive Medium: Detonation Ignition and a Mechanism for Type Ia Supernovae, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021), no. 1 011101, [2104.07066]

    2021 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Steigerwald, V

    H. Steigerwald, V . Marra, and S. Profumo,Revisiting constraints on asymmetric dark matter from collapse in white dwarf stars, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 8 083507, [2203.09054]

    2022 arXiv

  149. [157]

    D. C. Rodrigues, A. Hernandez-Arboleda, and A. Wojnar, Normalized additional velocity distribution: Testing the radial profile of dark matter halos and MOND, Phys. Dark Univ. 41 (2023) 101230, [2204.03762]

    2023 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Hernandez-Arboleda, D

    A. Hernandez-Arboleda, D. C. Rodrigues, J. D. Toniato, and A. Wojnar, Palatini f(R) gravity tests in weak field limit: Solar system, seismology and galaxies, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 20 (2023), no. Supp01 2450028, [2306.04475]

    2023 arXiv

  151. [159]

    G. F. S. Alves, S. Gardner, P. Machado, and M. Zakeri, Does the Sun have a Dark Disk?, 2406.03607

    arXiv

  152. [160]

    N. G. de Is ´ıdio et. al., Dark matter distribution in Milky Way-analog galaxies, 2310.13839

    arXiv

  153. [161]

    F. S. Lima, R. F. L. Holanda, S. H. Pereira, and W. J. C. da Silva, On the cosmic distance duality relation and strong gravitational lens power law density profile, JCAP 08 (2021) 035, [2104.06202]. 16

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.