Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

A Nearby Dark Molecular Cloud in the Local Bubble Revealed via H$_2$ Fluorescence

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A previously unidentified molecular cloud, Eos, lies only 94 parsecs from the Sun and is predicted to photoevaporate in about 5.7 million years.

desk verdict A plausible and interesting discovery that needs a direct distance tie to the H2 gas before the 'closest dark cloud' claim can be taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.17843 v1 pith:SZ2Q6DKY submitted 2025-04-24 astro-ph.GA

Blakesley Burkhart , Thavisha E. Dharmawardena , Shmuel Bialy , Thomas J. Haworth , Fernando Cruz Aguirre , Young-Soo Jo , B-G Andersson , Haeun Chung
show 15 more authors
Jerry Edelstein Isabelle Grenier Erika T. Hamden Wonyong Han Keri Hoadley Min-Young Lee Kyoung-Wook Min Thomas Müller Kate Pattle J. E. G. Peek Geoff Pleiss David Schiminovich Kwang-Il Seon Andrew Gordon Wilson Catherine Zucker
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords ISM:cloudsmoleculesstructureH2fluorescenceCO-darkgasLocalBubble3Ddustmappingphotodissociation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the discovery of Eos, a diffuse molecular cloud at 94$-$130 parsecs from the Sun, identified for the first time through far-ultraviolet fluorescent emission of molecular hydrogen rather than through carbon monoxide. The authors argue that most of the cloud's molecular mass, about $3.4\times10^3$ solar masses, is CO-dark gas that standard CO surveys miss, with only 20$-$40 solar masses visible in CO. They place the cloud on the surface of the Local Bubble beside the high-latitude part of the North Polar Spur, and show that its crescent-shaped boundary casts shadows in soft X-ray and O VI emission. From the observed $\mathrm{H}_2$ dissociation and formation rates, they conclude the cloud is being photodissociated faster than it can reform molecules, and they predict it will be destroyed in about 5.7 million years. If correct, Eos is the nearest example of the long-predicted population of CO-dark molecular clouds that standard census methods overlook.

What carries the argument

The central object is fluorescent $\mathrm{H}_2$ line emission: $\mathrm{H}_2$ molecules that absorb Lyman-Werner-band photons (11.2$-$13.6 eV) re-emit in the FUV between about 912 and 1700 \AA, tracing the warm boundary layer where atomic gas turns molecular. The paper stacks FIMS/SPEAR spectra, removes continuum and atomic lines, and maps the ratio of $\mathrm{H}_2$ fluorescence to total FUV intensity, which isolates Eos as a distinct crescent. To convert the observed fluorescence into a physical state, it uses H2Spec synthetic spectra to correct for the instrument's limited bandpass and sensitivity, a steady-state photodissociation-region formula for the expected total line intensity, and the non-equilibrium rate relations that connect FUV line intensity and HI column to dissociation and formation rates. The independent distance and mass come from the Dustribution 3D dust density cube, which shows a single dust structure at 94$-$130 pc.

What would settle it

A far-ultraviolet absorption-line observation toward stars with known distances behind Eos would settle the association: if the $\mathrm{H}_2$ gas has a radial velocity that places it outside 94$-$130 pc, or if the absorbing gas is at a different distance than the dust, the cloud's distance, mass, CO-dark fraction, and 5.7 Myr destruction timescale would all lose their anchor. Alternatively, a high-resolution FUV spectrum that resolves individual $\mathrm{H}_2$ rotational lines could test the assumed fluorescent excitation and the derived dissociation and formation rates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that one coherent molecular structure, named Eos, exists at 94$-$130 pc with a total molecular mass near $3.4\times10^3$ solar masses, while the CO-bright region inside it, MBM 40, accounts for only about 20$-$40 solar masses. The discovery rests on the $\mathrm{H}_2$ fluorescent emission map of the FIMS/SPEAR all-sky survey: the cloud appears as a bright feature in the ratio of $\mathrm{H}_2$ fluorescence to total FUV continuum, with a crescent shape that matches 21-cm HI emission, absorbs 0.25 and 1 keV X-rays, and shadows O VI emission. The 3D dust map places the cloud at 94$-$130 pc with no other cloud along the same sight lines, and the authors associate it with the nearby side of the Local Bubble and the high-latitude segment of the North Polar Spur. Because the measured $\mathrm{H}_2$ dissociation rate ($\dot{\Sigma}_D^{\rm obs}=0.32\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{-1}$) exceeds the formation rate ($\dot{\Sigma}_F^{\rm obs}=0.02\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{-1}$), the paper concludes that the cloud is out of chemical equilibrium and is being destroyed at about 600 solar masses per million years, giving a photoevaporation timescale of 5.7 Myr.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the 2D $\mathrm{H}_2$ fluorescent feature and the dust structure recovered at 94$-$130 pc are the same physical gas, because the paper has no direct kinematic distance, absorption-line measurement, or parallax that ties the emitting gas to that dust.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Local molecular-gas inventories would need to be revised upward, because a $3.4\times10^3$ solar-mass cloud at 94$-$130 pc is almost invisible in CO and conventional surveys would classify that gas as atomic or dark.
  • FUV $\mathrm{H}_2$ fluorescence becomes a practical discovery method for molecular clouds, extending detection to the CO-dark boundary layers that trace the atomic-to-molecular transition.
  • Eos is a live example of feedback destroying a cloud before star formation: with dissociation outpacing formation, the cloud will photoevaporate in 5.7 Myr rather than collapse.
  • The soft X-ray and O VI shadows cast by the cloud make it the nearest hot-cold interstellar gas interface, letting observers watch how molecular gas ablates against million-degree gas.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If follow-up absorption measurements confirm the 94$-$130 pc association, Eos would become the best local benchmark for the CO-dark fraction in diffuse clouds, because it ties a dust-distance measurement to a direct molecular tracer in a single object.
  • The same fluorescence-to-FUV-ratio technique could be applied across the archival FIMS/SPEAR sky to search for additional Eos-like clouds on the Local Bubble surface, a search the paper itself motivates but does not carry out.
  • A high-resolution FUV spectrum resolving individual $\mathrm{H}_2$ lines could measure the cloud's temperature and ortho-para ratio, directly testing the out-of-equilibrium photodissociation picture and refining the 5.7 Myr lifetime.
  • If Eos is representative, diffuse high-latitude clouds near the Sun may generally be transient, feedback-dissociated structures rather than future star-forming sites, implying that the nearby clouds that do form stars formed under different shielding or dynamical conditions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of a diffuse molecular cloud, named Eos, traced by far-ultraviolet H2 fluorescent emission in the FIMS/SPEAR all-sky data. The cloud appears at Galactic coordinates l ≈ 25°–45°, b ≈ 40°–63° as a crescent-shaped feature with an average detected intensity of about 20,000 LU, and it is not seen in FUV continuum or H-alpha. The authors overlay the H2 contours on GALFA-HI, Planck dust, ROSAT 0.25/1 keV X-ray, O VI, and CO maps, and use the Dustribution 3D dust map to argue that a dust cloud at 94–130 pc is physically associated with the H2 emission. From this association they derive a total cloud mass of 5.5×10^3 M_sun, an H2 mass of 3.4×10^3 M_sun, and a CO-bright mass of only 20–40 M_sun, concluding that Eos is mostly CO-dark. Using the H2 dissociation/formation framework of Bialy et al. (2024), they estimate a photoevaporation timescale of 5.7 Myr and argue that the cloud is being destroyed by FUV and X-ray radiation faster than it can form molecules. The paper claims this is the first molecular cloud identified via H2 fluorescence and the closest dark molecular cloud to the Sun.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this would be a genuinely novel result: a new method for finding CO-dark molecular gas, a nearby example of a hot-cold interstellar interface, and a concrete case of stellar feedback destroying a molecular cloud on a few-million-year timescale. The paper has notable strengths: it uses publicly available multi-wavelength data, releases the 3D dust map and code, explicitly checks the robustness of the H2 feature to adaptive smoothing (Supplemental Figure 1), and acknowledges a factor-of-three mass discrepancy with an independent 3D dust map (Edenhofer et al. 2024). However, the headline distance, mass, and photoevaporation time all rest on two load-bearing assumptions: that the H2 fluorescent emission originates in the same structure as the 94–130 pc dust cloud, and that the total H2 intensity I_tot recovered from fitting H2Spec with assumed χ=1 and T=100 K is reliable despite the paper's own argument that X-ray excitation and non-equilibrium effects are important. These assumptions need to be either directly tested or substantially qualified before the quantitative claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Distance determination (Fig. 3; 'We compute the distance of the cloud...')] The distance of the H2-emitting gas is not independently established. FIMS/SPEAR has spectral resolution R≈550 and no velocity information; the H2 map is purely two-dimensional. The overlays with Dustribution dust slices, GALFA-HI, ROSAT shadows, and O VI are projected morphological alignments of line-of-sight-integrated tracers. An X-ray shadow demonstrates only that the cloud lies in front of some hot emitting gas, not that it lies at 94 pc. The manuscript itself notes on page 14 that O VI absorption toward stars with known distances will be of great value, acknowledging that this tie is currently missing. Because the 94–130 pc distance enters the mass estimate, the CO-dark fraction, the Local Bubble association, and the photoevaporation timescale, this is a load-bearing assumption that should be flagged prominently and, if possible, tested with an absorption-line measurement or by reframing the distance as conditional on the assumed association.
  2. [Methods, 'Non-steady-state Model' (Eqs. 5-6)] The 5.7 Myr photoevaporation timescale is derived from the dissociation rate using I_tot = 1.4×10^5 LU. That I_tot is not directly observed; it is the value obtained by fitting the H2Spec synthetic spectra to the FIMS/SPEAR data with χ=1, T=100 K, and the H2 column density as the sole free parameter, then correcting for the instrument response (Methods, 'Modeling the Limited Sensitivity of FIMS/SPEAR'). Yet the paper argues in 'Chemical Steady-State Model' and Figure 5 that the cloud is likely excited by X-rays and is out of chemical equilibrium. A χ=1 Draine ISRF may therefore be the wrong pump spectrum, and the H2Spec assumption of statistical equilibrium may not hold. The uncertainty in I_tot from these assumptions is not propagated into the quoted lifetime. The abstract's 5.7 Myr number should be presented as one value within a range that reflects the radiation-field and temperature assumptions, not as a definite prediction.
  3. [Methods, 'Building the 3D Dust Density Map' and Fig. 7] The headline mass estimates (M_H2 ≈ 3.4×10^3 M_sun, total mass 5.5×10^3 M_sun) depend on the Astrodendro boundary thresholds and on a fixed gas-to-dust mass ratio of 124. The manuscript's own validation against the Edenhofer et al. (2024) 3D dust map yields a factor-of-three lower mass (1.6×10^3 M_sun), and Figure 7 shows the recovered cloud mass varying strongly with the chosen threshold column density. Since the H2 mass enters the CO-dark fraction and the photoevaporation timescale, the abstract should quote a systematic range (roughly 1.6–5.5×10^3 M_sun or wider) rather than a single value, and the sensitivity to the gas-to-dust ratio should be stated explicitly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] The Introduction states that 'the cloud line intensity is 20,000 LU on average,' while Methods quotes the observed mean as ⟨I_det⟩ = (1.29±0.29)×10^4 LU. Please reconcile these numbers or clarify that the 20,000 LU refers to a peak or a different quantity.
  2. [Author affiliations] Typographical errors: 'Max Plank Institute' should be 'Max Planck Institute,' and 'Repulic of Korea' should be 'Republic of Korea.'
  3. [CO Mass (Eq. 7)] The CO mass estimate assumes MBM 40 is associated with Eos and adopts d = 100 pc; the authors note that the distance to MBM 40 is not well constrained. This caveat should also appear where the CO-bright mass 20–40 M_sun is quoted in the abstract and discussion.
  4. [Figure 4 caption] The caption refers to 'FIMS/SPEAR O vi data, modified from [55]' but the text and reference list use both 'O vi' and 'O VI'; please standardize the notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the discovery, distance, and mass estimates are observationally anchored, and the photoevaporation timescale is a derived estimate from an independent published framework.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are self-contained rather than circular. The H2 fluorescent cloud is identified directly from the FIMS/SPEAR all-sky H2 fluorescence map (Jo et al. 2017), which is an empirical dataset, not an output of this paper's models. The distance is obtained from the 3D dust map Dustribution, with the H2 2D contours overlaid on 3D dust slices; whether the H2-emitting gas and the 94–130 pc dust feature are physically co-located is a scientific assumption (morphological association), not a definitional reduction, so it is a correctness/evidence risk but not circularity. The cloud mass (M_H2 ≈ 3.4×10^3 M_sun) is derived from dust extinction and a gas-to-dust ratio, independent of the H2 intensity fit. The photoevaporation analysis uses Eqs. (5) and (6) from Bialy et al. (2024), which is coauthored by this paper's coauthor S. Bialy; however, that is an externally published analytical/simulation-calibrated framework and is not an unverified self-citation invoked to forbid alternatives. The 5.7 Myr timescale is an arithmetic consequence of the observed H2 intensity (Itot fitted via H2Spec to FIMS data), the dust-derived H2 mass, and the cloud radius; it is labeled an estimate and is a consistency calculation rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. No step reduces by construction to its own input, and no uniqueness theorem from prior author work is invoked. The self-citation is noted but is not load-bearing in a circular sense, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity (score 0).

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a small set of standard ISM assumptions plus a few unvalidated inputs: the FIMS map, the H2Spec model, the steady-state PDR rate framework, the Dustribution/VNNGP dust map, constant gas-to-dust ratio, and the physical association of the 2D H2 feature with the 3D dust cloud. The cloud's existence is an observational claim; the mass and lifetime are model-dependent.

free parameters (3)
  • H2 column density of emitting layer (N_H2 in H2Spec) = implicit; tuned so I_tot = (1.44 +/- 0.10)e5 LU
    The single variable in the H2Spec fit to the observed FIMS/SPEAR detected intensity <I_det> = (1.29 +/- 0.29)e4 LU; the resulting total intensity drives the dissociation rate and lifetime.
  • Astrodendro 3D boundary thresholds = min density 4e-5 mag pc^-1, min delta 0.15 dex, min pixels 8
    Chosen based on the final mean Dustribution model parameters; directly sets the cloud volume, effective radius 25.5 pc, and dust mass.
  • Cloud defining column threshold N_thresh = 2-3e20 cm^-2
    Supplemental Figure 7: mass varies strongly with this threshold; the paper selects 2-3e20 to best capture the boundary, affecting the 3.4e3 M_sun H2 mass.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The FIMS/SPEAR H2 fluorescence map (Jo+2017) correctly separates H2 fluorescent emission from continuum and atomic lines; the Eos feature is real and not an artifact of adaptive smoothing.
    The discovery rests entirely on this map; the paper checks robustness but does not reprocess raw data.
  • domain assumption H2Spec (Hoadley+2015) accurately predicts the H2 fluorescent spectrum for given column, temperature, and radiation field, and the Draine ISRF with chi=1 applies to Eos.
    Used to convert detected intensity to total I_tot; if the true illuminating spectrum differs (e.g., X-ray contribution), I_tot changes.
  • domain assumption The steady-state PDR framework (Sternberg+1989; Bialy+2016, 2024) describes H2 formation/dissociation balance in this cloud.
    Equations 3-6 come from this framework; the paper argues the cloud is out of equilibrium but uses the same rate coefficients.
  • domain assumption Dustribution with a VNNGP modification reconstructs the 3D dust density correctly at 3 pc resolution; the modification is described only in a forthcoming paper.
    Underpins distance (94-130 pc) and dust mass; no validation of the modified algorithm is provided in this paper.
  • domain assumption A constant gas-to-dust mass ratio of 124 (Draine+2003) applies throughout the cloud.
    Dust mass 44 M_sun is converted to total mass 5.5e3 M_sun using this ratio; variations would directly change the H2 mass and CO-dark fraction.
  • domain assumption The CO-to-H2 conversion factor X_CO = 2e20 cm^-2 (K km/s)^-1 applies to MBM40 at high latitude.
    Converts CO luminosity to CO-bright H2 mass; the paper acknowledges factor of few uncertainties.
  • domain assumption The FUV H2 emission is physically associated with the dust cloud at 94-130 pc, rather than a chance superposition with gas at another distance.
    The paper overlays 2D contours on 3D dust slices but has no kinematic or absorption measurement tying the H2 gas to the dust distance.
  • domain assumption The cloud is roughly spherical with effective radius 25.5 pc, uniform density, and no magnetic or turbulent support in Jeans and lifetime estimates.
    Used for Jeans mass and photoevaporation timescale; adding support would change stability and mass loss estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Nearby Dark Molecular Cloud in the Local Bubble Revealed via H$_2$ Fluorescence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SZ2Q6DKY

@misc{pith2026250417843,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Nearby Dark Molecular Cloud in the Local Bubble Revealed via H$_2$ Fluorescence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SZ2Q6DKY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.17843}
}
abstract

A longstanding prediction in interstellar theory posits that significant quantities of molecular gas, crucial for star formation, may be undetected due to being ``dark" in commonly used molecular gas tracers, such as carbon monoxide. We report the discovery of Eos, the closest dark molecular cloud, located just 94 parsecs from the Sun. This cloud is the first molecular cloud ever to be identified using H$_2$ far ultra-violet (FUV) fluorescent line emission, which traces molecular gas at the boundary layers of star-forming and supernova remnant regions. The cloud edge is outlined along the high-latitude side of the North Polar Spur, a prominent x-ray/radio structure. Our distance estimate utilizes 3D dust maps, the absorption of the soft X-ray background, and hot gas tracers such as O\,{\sc vi}; these place the cloud at a distance consistent with the Local Bubble's surface. Using high-latitude CO maps we note a small amount (M$_{\rm{H}_2}\approx$20-40\,M$_\odot$) of CO-bright cold molecular gas, in contrast with the much larger estimate of the cloud's true molecular mass (M$_{\rm{H}_2}\approx3.4\times 10^3$\,M$_\odot$), indicating most of the cloud is CO-dark. Combining observational data with novel analytical models and simulations, we predict this cloud will photoevaporate in 5.7 million years, placing key constraints on the role of stellar feedback in shaping the closest star-forming regions to the Sun.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.17843 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. If we instead include all the dust in the range 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Searching for star formation towards the Eos molecular cloud

    astro-ph.GA 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    No young stellar population or kinematic clustering is found toward the Eos cloud, indicating it has not recently formed stars.

  2. Faint absorption of the ground state hyperfine-splitting transitions of hydroxyl at 18 cm in the Galactic Disk

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A deep OH absorption survey toward four continuum sources confirms OH as a widespread molecular gas tracer, yields median abundances of about 1.2e-7 relative to H2, and finds only one CO-dark component in 23.

  3. Magnetic fields in the Eos Cloud: dynamically important fields in the interface between atomic and molecular gas

    astro-ph.GA 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Magnetic fields in the Eos cloud are parallel to the cloud structure, sub-Alfvenic, and subcritical, with plane-of-sky strengths around 6 microgauss in Eos and 12 microgauss in the denser MBM 40 region.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Zucker, C. et al. Star formation near the Sun is driven by expansion of the Local Bubble. Nature 601, 334–337 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    M., Haslam, C

    Berkhuijsen, E. M., Haslam, C. G. T. & Salter, C. J. Structure of the north polar spur and the local supernova hypothesis. Astronomy and Astrophysics 14, 252–268 (1971)

    work page 1971

  3. [3]

    NICEST, a near-infrared color excess method tailored to small-scale structures

    Lombardi, M. NICEST, a near-infrared color excess method tailored to small-scale structures. Astron. Astrophys. 493, 735–745 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Planck 2013 results

    Collaboration, P. Planck 2013 results. xi. all-sky model of thermal dust emission. Astron. Astrophys. 571, A11 (2014). URL https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/ 2014A%26A...571A..11P

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    M., Hartmann, D

    Dame, T. M., Hartmann, D. & Thaddeus, P. The Milky Way in Molecular Clouds: A New Complete CO Survey. Astrophys. J. 547, 792–813 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Dame, T. M. & Thaddeus, P. A CO Survey of the Entire Northern Sky.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 262, 5 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Koda, J. Wong, T. & Kim, W.-T. (eds) Molecular Clouds with CO-dark Envelopes in the Extended Ultraviolet (XUV) Disk of M83 . (eds Wong, T. & Kim, W.- T.) Resolving the Rise and Fall of Star Formation in Galaxies , Vol. 373 of IAU Symposium, 15–20 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Lebrun, F. et al. COS-B gamma-ray measurements, cosmic rays and the local interstellar medium. Astron. Astrophys. 107, 390–396 (1982)

    work page 1982

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    A., Lebrun, F., Arnaud, M., Dame, T

    Grenier, I. A., Lebrun, F., Arnaud, M., Dame, T. M. & Thaddeus, P. CO Obser- vations of the Cepheus Flare. I. Molecular Clouds Associated with a Nearby Bubble. Astrophys. J. 347, 231 (1989)

    1989

  2. [10]

    Busch, M. P. First Extragalactic Detection of Thermal Hydroxyl (OH) 18 cm Emission in M31 Reveals Abundant CO-faint Molecular Gas. Astrophys. J. 967, 148 (2024). 21

    2024

  3. [11]

    Black, J. H. & van Dishoeck, E. F. Fluorescent Excitation of Interstellar H 2. Astrophys. J. 322, 412 (1987)

    1987

  4. [12]

    & Dalgarno, A

    Sternberg, A. & Dalgarno, A. The Infrared Response of Molecular Hydrogen Gas to Ultraviolet Radiation: High-Density Regions. Astrophys. J. 338, 197 (1989)

    1989

  5. [13]

    & Han, W

    Jo, Y.-S., Seon, K.-I., Min, K.-W., Edelstein, J. & Han, W. A Far-ultraviolet Flu- orescent Molecular Hydrogen Emission Map of the Milky Way Galaxy.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 231, 21 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Spectroscopy of Plasma Evolution from Astrophysical Radiation

    Edelstein, J. et al. The “Spectroscopy of Plasma Evolution from Astrophysical Radiation” Mission. Astrophys. J. Lett. 644, L153–L158 (2006)

    2006

  7. [15]

    Peek, J. E. G. et al. The GALFA-HI Survey: Data Release 1. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 194, 20 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Lee, M.-Y. et al. A High-resolution Study of the H I-H 2 Transition across the Perseus Molecular Cloud. Astrophys. J. 748, 75 (2012)

    2012

  9. [17]

    & Burkhart, B

    Imara, N. & Burkhart, B. The H I Probability Distribution Function and the Atomic-to-molecular Transition in Molecular Clouds. Astrophys. J. 829, 102 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    M., Lee, M.-Y., Burkhart, B

    Pingel, N. M., Lee, M.-Y., Burkhart, B. & Stanimirovi´ c, S. Multi-phase Turbu- lence Density Power Spectra in the Perseus Molecular Cloud. Astrophys. J. 856, 136 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Burkhart, B., Lee, M.-Y., Murray, C. E. & Stanimirovi´ c, S. The Lognormal Probability Distribution Function of the Perseus Molecular Cloud: A Comparison of HI and Dust. Astrophys. J. Lett. 811, L28 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    & Bialy, S

    Sternberg, A., Gurman, A. & Bialy, S. H i-to-h transitions in dust-free interstellar gas. The Astrophysical Journal 920, 83 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac167b

    2021

  13. [21]

    & Mundy, L

    Magnani, L., Blitz, L. & Mundy, L. Molecular gas at high galactic latitudes. Astrophys. J. 295, 402–421 (1985)

    1985

  14. [22]

    N., Olofsson, H

    Monaci, M., Magnani, L., Shore, S. N., Olofsson, H. & Joy, M. R. Shear, writhe, and filaments: Turbulence in the high-latitude molecular cloud MBM 40. Astron. Astrophys. 676, A138 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    E., Bailer-Jones, C

    Dharmawardena, T. E., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Fouesneau, M. & Foreman- Mackey, D. Three-dimensional dust density structure of the Orion, Cygnus X, Taurus, and Perseus star-forming regions. Astron. Astrophys. 658, A166 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Dharmawardena, T. E. et al. The three-dimensional structure of galactic molec- ular cloud complexes out to 2.5 kpc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 519, 228–247 22 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Dharmawardena, T. E. et al. All-sky three-dimensional dust density and extinc- tion Maps of the Milky Way out to 2.8 kpc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Adam, R. et al. Planck2015 results: X. diffuse component separation: Foreground maps. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A10 (2016). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/201525967

    2016

  19. [27]

    L., Landecker, T

    West, J. L., Landecker, T. L., Gaensler, B. M., Jaffe, T. & Hill, A. S. A Unified Model for the Fan Region and the North Polar Spur: A Bundle of Filaments in the Local Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 923, 58 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    V., Dickinson, C., Readhead, A

    Panopoulou, G. V., Dickinson, C., Readhead, A. C. S., Pearson, T. J. & Peel, M. W. Revisiting the Distance to Radio Loops I and IV Using Gaia and Radio/Optical Polarization Data. Astrophys. J. 922, 210 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Draine, B. T. Scattering by Interstellar Dust Grains. I. Optical and Ultraviolet. Astrophys. J. 598, 1017–1025 (2003)

    2003

  22. [30]

    Goodman, A. A. et al. A role for self-gravity at multiple length scales in the process of star formation. Nature 457, 63–66 (2009)

    2009

  23. [31]

    & Rosolowsky, E

    Burkhart, B., Lazarian, A., Goodman, A. & Rosolowsky, E. Hierarchical Struc- ture of Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in Position-position-velocity Space. Astrophys. J. 770, 141 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Puspitarini, L., Lallement, R., Vergely, J. L. & Snowden, S. L. Local ISM 3D distribution and soft X-ray background. Inferences on nearby hot gas and the North Polar Spur. Astron. Astrophys. 566, A13 (2014)

    2014

  25. [33]

    North Polar Spur/Loop I: gigantic outskirt of the Northern Fermi bubble or nearby hot gas cavity blown by supernovae? Comptes Rendus Physique 23, 1–24 (2023)

    Lallement, R. North Polar Spur/Loop I: gigantic outskirt of the Northern Fermi bubble or nearby hot gas cavity blown by supernovae? Comptes Rendus Physique 23, 1–24 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    L., Mebold, U., Hirth, W., Herbstmeier, U

    Snowden, S. L., Mebold, U., Hirth, W., Herbstmeier, U. & Schmitt, J. H. M. ROSAT Detection of an X-ray Shadow in the 1/4-keV Diffuse Background in the Draco Nebula. Science 252, 1529–1532 (1991)

    1991

  27. [35]

    Shelton, R. L. Revising the local bubble model due to solar wind charge exchange x-ray emission. Space Science Reviews 143, 231–239 (2008). URL http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s11214-008-9358-8

    2008 doi

  28. [36]

    G., Knauth, D

    Andersson, B. G., Knauth, D. C., Snowden, S. L., Shelton, R. L. & Wannier, P. G. A Hot Envelope around the Southern Coalsack: X-Ray and Far-Ultraviolet Observations. Astrophys. J. 606, 341–352 (2004). 23

    2004

  29. [37]

    & Montier, L

    Pelgrims, V., Ferri` ere, K., Boulanger, F., Lallement, R. & Montier, L. Modeling the magnetized Local Bubble from dust data.Astron. Astrophys. 636, A17 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    J., Zucker, C., Goodman, A

    O’Neill, T. J., Zucker, C., Goodman, A. A. & Edenhofer, G. The Local Bub- ble is a Local Chimney: A New Model from 3D Dust Mapping. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2403.04961 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Hamden, E. T. et al. Hyperion: the origin of the stars. A far UV space telescope for high-resolution spectroscopy over wide fields. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 8, 044008 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Based on the fact that ˙Σ(obs) F < ˙Σ(obs) D and the fact that the cloud is quasi-Jeans supported, we conclude that the cloud is dissociating

    provides an estimate of the formation rate ( ˙Σ(obs) F ), which we estimate to be ˙Σ(obs) F = 0.02 M⊙ pc−2 Myr−1. Based on the fact that ˙Σ(obs) F < ˙Σ(obs) D and the fact that the cloud is quasi-Jeans supported, we conclude that the cloud is dissociating. Given ˙Σ(obs) D , a ...

    2023

  33. [41]

    Bialy, S. et al. The molecular cloud lifecycle i: Constraining h2 formation and dissociation rates with observations. Astrophys. J. (2024). URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2408.06416

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Soler, J. D. et al. A comparison of the Milky Way’s recent star formation revealed by dust thermal emission and high-mass stars. Astron. Astrophys. 678, A95 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Inefficient star formation through turbulence, magnetic fields and feedback

    Federrath, C. Inefficient star formation through turbulence, magnetic fields and feedback. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 4035–4042 (2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    M., Wandelt, B

    Gorski, K. M., Wandelt, B. D., Hansen, F. K., Hivon, E. & Banday, A. J. The healpix primer (1999). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9905275. astro-ph/ 9905275

    1999 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Ryu, K. et al. Blades, J. C. & Siegmund, O. H. W. (eds) Optics development for the SPEAR mission . (eds Blades, J. C. & Siegmund, O. H. W.) Future EUV/UV and Visible Space Astrophysics Missions and Instrumentation. , Vol. 4854 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engine...

    2003

  38. [46]

    Edelstein, J. et al. The SPEAR Instrument and On-Orbit Performance. Astrophys. J. Lett. 644, L159–L162 (2006)

    2006

  39. [47]

    D., McJunkin, M

    Hoadley, K., France, K., Alexander, R. D., McJunkin, M. & Schneider, P. C. The Evolution of Inner Disk Gas in Transition Disks. Astrophys. J. 812, 41 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Draine, B. T. Photoelectric heating of interstellar gas. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 36, 595–619 (1978)

    1978

  41. [49]

    Habing, H. J. The interstellar radiation density between 912 A and 2400 A. Bulletin Astronomical Institute of the Netherlands 19, 421 (1968)

    1968

  42. [50]

    Korpela, E. J. et al. Blades, J. C. & Siegmund, O. H. W. (eds) The SPEAR science payload. (eds Blades, J. C. & Siegmund, O. H. W.) Future EUV/UV and Visible Space Astrophysics Missions and Instrumentation. , Vol. 4854 of Society 24 of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (S...

    2003

  43. [51]

    Ultraviolet Fluorescent Molecular Hydrogen Emission

    Sternberg, A. Ultraviolet Fluorescent Molecular Hydrogen Emission. Astrophys. J. 347, 863 (1989)

    1989

  44. [52]

    & Sternberg, A

    Bialy, S. & Sternberg, A. Analytic H I-to-H 2 Photodissociation Transition Profiles. Astrophys. J. 822, 83 (2016)

    2016

  45. [53]

    Walch, S. et al. The SILCC (SImulating the LifeCycle of molecular Clouds) project - I. Chemical evolution of the supernova-driven ISM.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 238–268 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    Seifried, D. et al. SILCC-Zoom: the dynamic and chemical evolution of molecular clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 472, 4797–4818 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Jo, Y.-S. et al. Global Distribution of Far-ultraviolet Emissions from Highly Ionized Gas in the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 243, 9 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Jo, Y.-S. et al. Global distribution of far-ultraviolet emissions from highly ionized gas in the milky way.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 243, 9 (2019). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab22ae

    2019 doi

  49. [57]

    & Cunningham, J

    Wu, L., Pleiss, G. & Cunningham, J. P. Variational nearest neighbor gaussian process. International Conference on Machine Learning 24114–24130 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Zhang, X., Green, G. M. & Rix, H.-W. Parameters of 220 million stars from Gaia BP/RP spectra. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 524, 1855–1884 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Edenhofer, G. et al. A parsec-scale Galactic 3D dust map out to 1.25 kpc from the Sun. Astron. Astrophys. 685, A82 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    D., Wolfire, M

    Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M. & Leroy, A. K. The CO-to-H 2 Conversion Factor. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51, 207–268 (2013)

    2013

  53. [61]

    F., Hopkins, P

    Skalidis, R., Goldsmith, P. F., Hopkins, P. F. & Ponnada, S. B. Constraining the H2 column densities in the diffuse interstellar medium using dust extinction and H I data. Astron. Astrophys. 682, A161 (2024). 25

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.