Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

SymTFT, Protected Gaplessness, and Spontaneous Breaking of Non-invertible Symmetries

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves a number-theoretic criterion for when a duality rotation admits an invariant gapped boundary in the 4+1d BF SymTFT; absent such a boundary, a symmetry-preserving RG flow cannot end in a trivially gapped phase.

desk verdict Theorem 1 is a genuine and useful classification result; the protected-gaplessness conclusion is conditional on coarse SymTFT assumptions the authors clearly flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18501 v2 pith:LQU2XVXB submitted 2025-04-25 hep-th math.QA

Michele Del Zotto , Azeem Hasan , Elias Riedel G{aa}rding This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath.QA
keywords non-invertiblesymmetriesdualitydefectssymmetryTFTgaplessnessspontaneousbreakingLagrangiansubgroupsclassStheoriestopologicalorders
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks which non-invertible duality symmetries of 3+1d quantum field theories can be realized by a trivially gapped, symmetry-preserving infrared phase. It works with the topological symmetry theory (SymTFT), a 4+1d BF gauge theory whose gapped boundaries are classified by Lagrangian subgroups of the charge lattice $A\times A^\vee$. The central result is Theorem 1: for a finite cyclic group $G\subset Sp(2r,\mathbb{Z})$ acting on the $\mathbb{Z}_N^{2r}$ BF theory, a $G$-invariant Lagrangian subgroup exists unless an odd prime power $p_i^{k_i}$ and an odd cyclotomic power $\Phi_{n_j}(x)^{m_j}$ in $\det(x-g)$ satisfy $n_j$ coprime to $p_i$ with $-1\in\langle p_i\rangle_{n_j}$ (with a special $p_i=2$ case). Whenever no invariant boundary exists, a symmetry-preserving RG flow cannot end in a trivially gapped phase: the IR is either gapless or the symmetry is spontaneously broken. The paper applies this to the $N=1^*$ theories and to class $S$ theories on higher-genus surfaces, and extends the criterion to non-abelian subgroups such as the automorphism groups of the Bolza surface and the Klein quartic.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the topological symmetry theory itself: the 4+1d BF gauge theory $F_A$ with gauge group $A$, whose topological surface operators carry charges in $A\times A^\vee$ and whose gapped boundary conditions are Lagrangian subgroups $L\subset A\times A^\vee$. A duality rotation $g\in Sp(2r,\mathbb{Z})$ acts on this charge lattice, and the existence of a symmetry-preserving gapped boundary is exactly the existence of a $G$-invariant Lagrangian subgroup. The technical engine that decides this is the cyclotomic factorization of $\det(x-g)=\prod_j\Phi_{n_j}(x)^{m_j}$ together with Galois-theoretic and $p$-adic analysis (Hensel lifting and the structure of the Galois groups $\langle p\rangle_{n_j}\subseteq \mathbb{Z}_{n_j}^\times$), which yield the simple obstruction $-1\in\langle p_i\rangle_{n_j}$ of Theorem 1. For non-abelian $G$, the same question is settled by checking invariance under all generators after decomposing into irreducible subspaces over subfields of cyclotomic fields.

What would settle it

Look for a 3+1d theory whose non-invertible duality symmetry has a generator $g$ and level $N$ satisfying the obstruction of Theorem 1 (for example $S$-duality with $N=p^{2k+1}$, $p\equiv 3\pmod 4$), and compute the infrared Hilbert space of a symmetry-preserving deformation: finding a unique gapped symmetric vacuum, or a trivially gapped SPT that carries the symmetry, would falsify the no-go conclusion. A cheaper check is to enumerate Lagrangian subgroups of $\mathbb{Z}_N^{2r}$ for a finite list of $(N,g)$ pairs and compare with Theorem 1's list; any mismatch disproves the criterion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a first coarse classification of the non-invertible zero-form duality symmetries that protect gaplessness or force spontaneous symmetry breaking in 3+1d. The classification is reduced to an arithmetic question about the finite group $G\subseteq Sp(2r,\mathbb{Z})$ acting on the $\mathbb{Z}_N^{2r}$ BF symmetry theory: writing $\det(x-g)=\prod_j \Phi_{n_j}(x)^{m_j}$ for the generator $g$, the theory has an irreducible topological $G$-invariant boundary condition precisely unless an odd power $p_i^{k_i}$ of $N$ and an odd multiplicity $m_j$ meet the obstruction of Theorem 1. If no such boundary condition exists and the non-invertible symmetry is preserved along the flow, the only symmetry-preserving IR options are gaplessness or spontaneous breaking; in particular, no SPT or trivially gapped topological order can carry the symmetry. The same SymTFT analysis also describes what happens when the symmetry is spontaneously broken, with the non-invertible defects acting as domain walls exchanging vacua.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that no trivially gapped phase exists whenever no invariant Lagrangian exists presumes that every possible gapped boundary of the SymTFT is captured by a Lagrangian subgroup of the $\mathbb{Z}_N^{2r}$ charge lattice, with spin-structure, torsional-homology, SPT-stacking, and second-level obstruction effects neglected.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any finite abelian subgroup of $Sp(2r,\mathbb{Z})$, one can algorithmically decide whether a 3+1d theory with that family of duality defects admits a trivially gapped symmetry-preserving IR phase by factoring the characteristic polynomial of the generator and checking the condition of Theorem 1.
  • If Theorem 1 rules out invariant lagrangians, preserving the non-invertible symmetry along a relevant deformation forces gaplessness or spontaneous symmetry breaking, including cases where the one-form symmetry itself may also break.
  • The $r=1$ analysis reproduces and extends known results for $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ duality and triality defects in gauge theories, specifying exactly which $N$ admit invariant lagrangians.
  • Applied to $N=1^*$ theories, the boundary-condition analysis recovers the previously found vacuum structure and identifies an extra topological boundary condition corresponding to gauging $S$-duality, which may select global forms without ordinary Lagrangian descriptions.
  • For class $S$ theories on higher-genus surfaces, deformations that preserve cyclic duality symmetries exist; whether the IR must be gapless or spontaneously broken is decided by the prime factors of $N$ through the same cyclotomic criterion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the theorem's dependence only on the characteristic polynomial suggests the same $p$-adic Jordan-form method can be applied to infinite-order elements of $Sp(2r,\mathbb{Z})$, producing constraints on duality symmetries that are not reductions of finite subgroups; the paper sketches this for $r=1$.
  • Beyond the paper, the neglected refinements named in footnote 3 and Section 4.3—spin structure, torsional homology, SPT stacking, and the second-level obstruction—could add invariant boundaries in some cases; redoing the classification with these data would tell whether any currently predicted 'gapless or broken' cases admit a trivially gapped escape.
  • Beyond the paper, the extra vacua corresponding to gauged duality symmetry (the $B^{(2)}$ boundary conditions) suggest that some symmetry-preserving flows may end on non-Lagrangian fixed points analogous to Argyres-Douglas theories; one could test this by looking for such vacua in non-SUSY deformations of Argyres-Douglas-like models.
  • Beyond the paper, the arithmetic condition can be read as a 4d analogue of a Lieb-Schultz-Mattis constraint: the non-invertible symmetry carries a charge that no topological line can realize, so a lattice or tensor-network construction preserving the duality defect should exhibit either gapless excitations or vacua exchanged by the defect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a coarse classification of G-invariant Lagrangian subgroups of the finite abelian group Z_N^{2r}, which serve as topological boundary conditions of the 4+1d BF SymTFT for 3+1d theories with a 1-form symmetry and a non-invertible duality 0-form symmetry. The central result, Theorem 1 in §4.4, gives a cyclotomic-factorization criterion for whether a finite cyclic subgroup G⊂Sp(2r,Z) admits an irreducible G-invariant Lagrangian subgroup of Z_N^{2r}. The proof is carried out in Appendices B–D using p-adic methods, Hensel lifting, and Galois theory, with non-abelian extensions in Appendix E. The paper then argues that when no such invariant Lagrangian exists and the non-invertible symmetry is preserved along an RG flow, the IR cannot be trivially gapped: it must be either gapless or spontaneously break the symmetry. Applications are given to N=1∗ theories and to supersymmetry-breaking deformations of class S theories.

Significance. If the physical inference is accepted within its stated scope, Theorem 1 provides a genuinely useful algorithmic classification: it is simple to apply, reproduces earlier results in [20,22–24], and extends them to all finite cyclic subgroups of Sp(2r,Z) and to composite N. The appendices are detailed and include explicit worked examples for SL(2,Z), the Bolza surface, and the Klein quartic, which give strong consistency checks. The non-abelian extension in Appendix E is a valuable addition. The main caveat is that the gaplessness/SSB conclusions are conditional on the 'coarse' SymTFT setup: the authors explicitly neglect spin-structure/torsional-homology effects, SPT stacking, and the second-level obstruction mentioned in footnote 17. Within that scope the paper is a solid contribution; the internal algebra of Theorem 1 appears sound and is not circular.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.3.2, footnote 17; §5.1–5.2] The central physical step from 'no G-invariant Lagrangian in F_A' to 'no trivially gapped symmetry-preserving IR phase' is not fully established beyond the coarse setup. Footnote 17 explicitly defers the 'second level obstruction': including a 5D SPT before gauging modifies the fusion algebra and can require a 4D SPT to absorb a phase, which can forbid a gapped boundary even when an invariant Lagrangian exists. Thus Theorem 1 is a necessary condition within the SPT-free BF theory, but the sufficiency direction for actual gapped phases of the orbifolded SymTFT F_A^G is not proven. Because the title and abstract present protected gaplessness as a general conclusion, the paper needs either to prove the missing step, to restrict the physical claims explicitly to the SPT-free coarse setup, or to formulate the physical statement as a conditional theorem with the second-level obstruction as an explicit assumption.
  2. [§5.1, Eqs. (5.3)–(5.7)] The uplift argument from boundary conditions of F_A to boundary conditions of F_A^G assumes that every symmetry-preserving gapped boundary of the orbifolded theory is obtained either from a G-invariant boundary of F_A or from a collection of boundaries permuted by the D_g defects. This converse is not demonstrated; the Carqueville–Runkel–Schaumann orbifold datum is cited, but no proof is given that no 'intrinsically orbifold' symmetry-preserving boundary exists. If such a boundary existed, it would provide a trivially gapped phase even when no invariant Lagrangian exists, which would invalidate the claimed gaplessness conclusion. Please provide a proof of this lifting statement or explicitly state it as an assumption of the coarse classification.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1, §4.4] The symbols ·, ⊙, and ⊗ in Table 1 are explained only in the caption and are easy to misread; please add a legend in the main text, preferably with one worked example showing how a row is read.
  2. [§5.3.1, N=2 example] The statement that the boundary condition B^{(2)}_{A+B} is 'not realized' by N=1∗ theories is imported from [46] and is not derived here; please mark it explicitly as an assumption or supply a direct dynamical argument.
  3. [§5.2.1, after Eq. (5.16)] The sentence 'any one-form symmetry that is not Z_{p^k}^r is anomalous' is stronger than what is proved: the preceding argument shows that a torsional Lagrangian intersects every other Lagrangian, which obstructs a trivially gapped phase, but the identification of this as an 'anomaly' requires a more precise statement about the mixed anomaly. Please clarify the terminology.
  4. [Appendix G] The sentence 'Since its order modulo p is φ(m)' is confusing because the Euler totient φ(m) is not an order; please rephrase the argument about the order of ζ_n modulo p^k.
  5. [Abstract and §1] There are several minor language issues, e.g. 'As a first applications' in the abstract and 'a N−1 theory' in §5.3.2; a careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1 is a self-contained algebraic classification, and the physical gaplessness/SSB conclusions are explicitly conditional on stated coarse SymTFT assumptions rather than derived from them by definition.

full rationale

The central result, Theorem 1, is a mathematical criterion for the existence of G-invariant Lagrangian subgroups of Z_N^{2r} BF theories. Its proof in Appendices B-D is self-contained: it proceeds through p-adic analysis, Hensel lifting, cyclotomic factorization, and Galois groups, and it is explicitly checked against prior results [20,22-24]. The physical inference from the absence of an invariant Lagrangian to the impossibility of a trivially gapped symmetry-preserving IR phase is a logical consequence of the stated SymTFT dictionary, under assumptions the authors flag as coarse: footnote 3 disclaims neglect of spin structure, torsional homology, and SPT stacking, and footnote 17 states that including a 5D SPT before gauging modifies the fusion algebra and introduces a 'second level obstruction' left to future work. These are modeling limitations, not circular inputs: the theorem is not defined in terms of the physical conclusion, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Self-citations such as [17,20] appear as sources of constructions and prior classifications, but the paper rederives and extends the relevant statements rather than merely importing the target result; the central claim therefore does not reduce to a self-citation chain. The paper is honest about the conditional nature of its physical conclusions, and no step in the derivation equates its prediction with its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the central theorem is a pure lattice-theoretic classification. The input axioms are the imported Johnson-Freyd-Yu classification of 4+1d topological orders and the standard Lagrangian-subgroup description of gapped boundaries of BF theory, plus the stated coarse restrictions. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption 4+1d topological orders with no line defects are Witt equivalent to BF theory with finite gauge group A (Johnson-Freyd-Yu classification).
    Imported from [92,93], Section 3.1; underpins the SymTFT construction used throughout.
  • domain assumption Gapped topological boundaries of Z_{p^k}^{2r} BF theory are classified by Lagrangian subgroups of A x A^vee.
    Section 4.1, standard SymTFT result; used to translate boundary conditions into the Lagrangian classification problem.
  • domain assumption The classification is coarse: spin structure, torsional homology, and SPT stacking are neglected, and the SymTFT is gauged without stacking SPTs.
    Footnote 3 and Section 4.3; the central theorem and applications are conditional on these restrictions.
  • standard math Standard results in Galois theory, Hensel's lemma, and cyclotomic factorization over p-adic fields.
    Used in Appendices B-D to prove Theorem 1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SymTFT, Protected Gaplessness, and Spontaneous Breaking of Non-invertible Symmetries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LQU2XVXB

@misc{pith2026250418501,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SymTFT, Protected Gaplessness, and Spontaneous Breaking of Non-invertible Symmetries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LQU2XVXB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18501}
}
read the original abstract

In recent years we have learned that several four-dimensional field theories can manifest non-invertible zero-form symmetries generalizing the Kramers-Wannier duality defect of the 2d critical Ising model. Several recent works by various groups have observed a deep interplay among such non-invertible symmetries in 3+1 dimensions, their anomalies, and the properties of the ground state(s). The purpose of this work is to present a first coarse classification of all possible classes of non-invertible symmetries of this type that can either enforce gaplessness or be spontaneously broken in the infrared exploiting the topological symmetry theory formalism. Our methods also generalize to non-invertible KW-like duality symmetries graded by non-abelian finite subgroups. As a first applications of our results we present examples in the context of supersymmetric models. Along the way we notice the potential for further global structures that could be realized by non-SUSY versions of Argyres-Douglas type fixed points.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Understanding Non-Split 2-Group Symmetry: (3+1)D SymTFT, Anomaly and Bordism

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For G=(Z2,Z2,triv,1), the authors classify anomalies via oriented and spin bordism in spacetime dimensions d<=5 and derive the (3+1)D SymTFT boundary conditions, including the equivalence of the anomalous symmetry cat...

  2. On the Physics of Higher Condensation Defects

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Topological defects from higher gauging are shown, via explicit Lagrangian computations, to satisfy the Karoubi completeness condition of Johnson-Freyd's higher fusion categories, and this is identified with splitting...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain,

    E. H. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, “Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain,” Annals Phys. 16 (1961) 407–466

    1961

  2. [2]

    Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimensions,

    M. B. Hastings, “Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimensions,” Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004) 104431, arXiv:cond-mat/0305505

    arXiv 2004

  3. [3]

    Anomaly Manifestation of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorem and Topological Phases,

    G. Y. Cho, S. Ryu, and C.-T. Hsieh, “Anomaly Manifestation of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorem and Topological Phases,” Phys. Rev. B 96 no. 19, (2017) 195105, arXiv:1705.03892 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorem and its generalizations from the Perspective of the Symmetry Protected Topological phase,

    C.-M. Jian, Z. Bi, and C. Xu, “Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorem and its generalizations from the Perspective of the Symmetry Protected Topological phase,” Phys. Rev. B 97 no. 5, (2018) 054412, arXiv:1705.00012 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Topological theory of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorems in quantum spin systems,

    D. V. Else and R. Thorngren, “Topological theory of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorems in quantum spin systems,” Phys. Rev. B 101 no. 22, (2020) 224437, arXiv:1907.08204 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Anomaly Obstructions to Symmetry Preserving Gapped Phases,

    C. C´ ordova and K. Ohmori, “Anomaly Obstructions to Symmetry Preserving Gapped Phases,” arXiv:1910.04962 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1910

  7. [7]

    Anomaly Constraints on Gapped Phases with Discrete Chiral Symmetry,

    C. C´ ordova and K. Ohmori, “Anomaly Constraints on Gapped Phases with Discrete Chiral Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 2, (2020) 025011, arXiv:1912.13069 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Topological characterization of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis constraints and applications to symmetry-enriched quantum criticality,

    W. Ye, M. Guo, Y.-C. He, C. Wang, and L. Zou, “Topological characterization of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis constraints and applications to symmetry-enriched quantum criticality,” SciPost Phys. 13 no. 3, (2022) 066, arXiv:2111.12097 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2022

Show all 141 references
  1. [9]

    Anomaly enforced gaplessness and symmetry fractionalization for SpinG symmetries,

    T. D. Brennan, “Anomaly enforced gaplessness and symmetry fractionalization for SpinG symmetries,” JHEP 02 (2024) 065, arXiv:2308.12999 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Anomaly Enforced Gaplessness for Background Flux Anomalies and Symmetry Fractionalization,

    T. D. Brennan and A. Sheckler, “Anomaly Enforced Gaplessness for Background Flux Anomalies and Symmetry Fractionalization,” arXiv:2311.00093 [hep-th] . 69

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Constraints on symmetry-preserving gapped phases from coupling constant anomalies,

    T. D. Brennan, “Constraints on symmetry-preserving gapped phases from coupling constant anomalies,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 4, (2024) L041701, arXiv:2404.11660 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Generalized Global Symmetries,

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,” JHEP 02 (2015) 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 12, (2022) 125016, arXiv:2111.01139 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 11, (2022) 111601, arXiv:2111.01141 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,” arXiv:2204.09025 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Non-invertible symmetries of N = 4 SYM and twisted compactification,

    J. Kaidi, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, “Non-invertible symmetries of N = 4 SYM and twisted compactification,” JHEP 08 (2022) 053, arXiv:2205.01104 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    On the 6d origin of non-invertible symmetries in 4d,

    V. Bashmakov, M. Del Zotto, and A. Hasan, “On the 6d origin of non-invertible symmetries in 4d,” JHEP 09 (2023) 161, arXiv:2206.07073 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Noninvertible Time-Reversal Symmetry,

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Noninvertible Time-Reversal Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 no. 13, (2023) 131602, arXiv:2208.04331 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries,

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries,” arXiv:2210.09146 [hep-th]

  12. [20]

    Non-invertible Symmetries of ClassS Theories,

    V. Bashmakov, M. Del Zotto, A. Hasan, and J. Kaidi, “Non-invertible Symmetries of ClassS Theories,” arXiv:2211.05138 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    ”Zoology

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “”Zoology” of non-invertible duality defects: the view from class S,” arXiv:2212.09549 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    When are Duality Defects Group-Theoretical?,

    Z. Sun and Y. Zheng, “When are Duality Defects Group-Theoretical?,” arXiv:2307.14428 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Anomalies of non-invertible symmetries in (3+1)d,

    C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, and C. Zhang, “Anomalies of non-invertible symmetries in (3+1)d,” SciPost Phys. 17 no. 5, (2024) 131, arXiv:2308.11706 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Anomalies of non-invertible self-duality symmetries: fractionalization and gauging,

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “Anomalies of non-invertible self-duality symmetries: fractionalization and gauging,” arXiv:2308.11707 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum,

    B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and I. Valenzuela, “Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum,” JHEP 09 (2021) 203, arXiv:2104.07036 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects,

    K. Roumpedakis, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, “Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects,” arXiv:2204.02407 [hep-th] . 70

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Non-Invertible Higher-Categorical Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “Non-Invertible Higher-Categorical Symmetries,” arXiv:2204.06564 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Non-invertible self-duality defects of Cardy-Rabinovici model and mixed gravitational anomaly,

    Y. Hayashi and Y. Tanizaki, “Non-invertible self-duality defects of Cardy-Rabinovici model and mixed gravitational anomaly,” JHEP 08 (2022) 036, arXiv:2204.07440 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies,

    C. Cordova and K. Ohmori, “Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies,” Phys. Rev. X 13 no. 1, (2023) 011034, arXiv:2205.06243 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Non-invertible defects in 5d, boundaries and holography,

    J. A. Damia, R. Argurio, and E. Garcia-Valdecasas, “Non-invertible defects in 5d, boundaries and holography,” SciPost Phys. 14 no. 4, (2023) 067, arXiv:2207.02831 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Universal Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, S. Schafer-Nameki, and J. Wu, “Universal Non-Invertible Symmetries,” Fortsch. Phys. 70 no. 11, (2022) 2200143, arXiv:2208.05973 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory I,

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, A. E. V. Ferrari, and J. Pearson, “Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory I,” arXiv:2208.05993 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Branes and Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    I. Garcia Etxebarria, “Branes and Non-Invertible Symmetries,” Fortsch. Phys. 70 no. 11, (2022) 2200154, arXiv:2208.07508 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Noninvertible Symmetries from Holography and Branes,

    F. Apruzzi, I. Bah, F. Bonetti, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Noninvertible Symmetries from Holography and Branes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 no. 12, (2023) 121601, arXiv:2208.07373 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Exploring non-invertible symmetries in free theories,

    P. Niro, K. Roumpedakis, and O. Sela, “Exploring non-invertible symmetries in free theories,” JHEP 03 (2023) 005, arXiv:2209.11166 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Non-invertible Gauss Law and Axions,

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Non-invertible Gauss Law and Axions,” arXiv:2212.04499 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Remarks on Geometric Engineering, Symmetry TFTs and Anomalies,

    M. Del Zotto, S. N. Meynet, and R. Moscrop, “Remarks on Geometric Engineering, Symmetry TFTs and Anomalies,” arXiv:2402.18646 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Non-invertible symmetries in axion electrodynamics,

    R. Yokokura, “Non-invertible symmetries in axion electrodynamics,” arXiv:2212.05001 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Unifying Constructions of Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “Unifying Constructions of Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2212.06159 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Non-Invertible Symmetry Webs,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “Non-Invertible Symmetry Webs,” arXiv:2212.06842 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory II,

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, A. E. V. Ferrari, and J. Pearson, “Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory II,” arXiv:2212.07393 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Non-Invertible Defects in Nonlinear Sigma Models and Coupling to Topological Orders,

    P.-S. Hsin, “Non-Invertible Defects in Nonlinear Sigma Models and Coupling to Topological Orders,” arXiv:2212.08608 [cond-mat.str-el] . 71

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Symmetry TFTs and Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    J. Kaidi, E. Nardoni, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs and Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2301.07112 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Comments on Non-invertible Symmetries in Argyres-Douglas Theories,

    F. Carta, S. Giacomelli, N. Mekareeya, and A. Mininno, “Comments on Non-invertible Symmetries in Argyres-Douglas Theories,” JHEP 07 (2023) 135, arXiv:2303.16216 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Generalized Charges, Part II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Generalized Charges, Part II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,” arXiv:2305.17159 [hep-th]

  38. [46]

    Non-invertible symmetries along 4d RG flows,

    J. A. Damia, R. Argurio, F. Benini, S. Benvenuti, C. Copetti, and L. Tizzano, “Non-invertible symmetries along 4d RG flows,” arXiv:2305.17084 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    When Z2 one-form symmetry leads to non-invertible axial symmetries,

    R. Argurio and R. Vandepopeliere, “When Z2 one-form symmetry leads to non-invertible axial symmetries,” JHEP 08 (2023) 205, arXiv:2306.01414 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Intermediate defect groups, polarization pairs, and noninvertible duality defects,

    C. Lawrie, X. Yu, and H. Y. Zhang, “Intermediate defect groups, polarization pairs, and noninvertible duality defects,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 2, (2024) 026005, arXiv:2306.11783 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Higher Structure of Chiral Symmetry,

    C. Copetti, M. Del Zotto, K. Ohmori, and Y. Wang, “Higher Structure of Chiral Symmetry,” Commun. Math. Phys. 406 no. 4, (2025) 73, arXiv:2305.18282 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Action of the axial U(1) non-invertible symmetry on the ’t˜Hooft line operator: A simple argument,

    Y. Honda, S. Onoda, and H. Suzuki, “Action of the axial U(1) non-invertible symmetry on the ’t˜Hooft line operator: A simple argument,” arXiv:2405.07669 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Non-invertible symmetries, brane dynamics, and tachyon condensation,

    I. Bah, E. Leung, and T. Waddleton, “Non-invertible symmetries, brane dynamics, and tachyon condensation,” JHEP 01 (2024) 117, arXiv:2306.15783 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Solitonic symmetry as non-invertible symmetry: cohomology theories with TQFT coefficients,

    S. Chen and Y. Tanizaki, “Solitonic symmetry as non-invertible symmetry: cohomology theories with TQFT coefficients,” arXiv:2307.00939 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Quantization of Axion-Gauge Couplings and Non-Invertible Higher Symmetries,

    Y. Choi, M. Forslund, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Quantization of Axion-Gauge Couplings and Non-Invertible Higher Symmetries,” arXiv:2309.03937 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Axion Domain Walls, Small Instantons, and Non-Invertible Symmetry Breaking,

    C. Cordova, S. Hong, and L.-T. Wang, “Axion Domain Walls, Small Instantons, and Non-Invertible Symmetry Breaking,” arXiv:2309.05636 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    The Club Sandwich: Gapless Phases and Phase Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “The Club Sandwich: Gapless Phases and Phase Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2312.17322 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Lattice realization of the axial U(1) non-invertible symmetry,

    Y. Honda, O. Morikawa, S. Onoda, and H. Suzuki, “Lattice realization of the axial U(1) non-invertible symmetry,” arXiv:2401.01331 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Emergent non-invertible symmetries in N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills theory,

    O. Sela, “Emergent non-invertible symmetries in N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills theory,” arXiv:2401.05032 [hep-th] . 72

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Non-Invertible Peccei-Quinn Symmetry and the Massless Quark Solution to the Strong CP Problem,

    C. Cordova, S. Hong, and S. Koren, “Non-Invertible Peccei-Quinn Symmetry and the Massless Quark Solution to the Strong CP Problem,” arXiv:2402.12453 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    The Non-Invertible Axial Symmetry in QED Comes Full Circle,

    A. Arbalestrier, R. Argurio, and L. Tizzano, “The Non-Invertible Axial Symmetry in QED Comes Full Circle,” arXiv:2405.06596 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    The SL2(R) duality and the non-invertibleU(1) symmetry of Maxwell theory,

    A. Hasan, S. Meynet, and D. Migliorati, “The SL2(R) duality and the non-invertibleU(1) symmetry of Maxwell theory,” arXiv:2405.19218 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    The Higher Structure of Symmetries of Axion-Maxwell Theory,

    M. Del Zotto, M. Dell’Acqua, and E. Riedel G˚ arding, “The Higher Structure of Symmetries of Axion-Maxwell Theory,” arXiv:2411.09685 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Higher Representations and Quark Confinement,

    F. Gagliano, A. Grigoletto, and K. Ohmori, “Higher Representations and Quark Confinement,” arXiv:2501.09069 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    Non-invertible and higher-form symmetries in 2+1d lattice gauge theories,

    Y. Choi, Y. Sanghavi, S.-H. Shao, and Y. Zheng, “Non-invertible and higher-form symmetries in 2+1d lattice gauge theories,” SciPost Phys. 18 no. 1, (2025) 008, arXiv:2405.13105 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Higgsing Transitions from Topological Field Theory & Non-Invertible Symmetry in Chern-Simons Matter Theories,

    C. Cordova, D. Garc´ ıa-Sep´ ulveda, and K. Ohmori, “Higgsing Transitions from Topological Field Theory & Non-Invertible Symmetry in Chern-Simons Matter Theories,” arXiv:2504.03614 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond,

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator, and S.-H. Shao, “Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond,” in 2022 Snowmass Summer Study . 5, 2022. arXiv:2205.09545 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,

    J. McGreevy, “Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,” arXiv:2204.03045 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Introduction to topological symmetry in QFT,

    D. S. Freed, “Introduction to topological symmetry in QFT,” arXiv:2212.00195 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    An introduction to higher-form symmetries,

    P. R. S. Gomes, “An introduction to higher-form symmetries,” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 74 (2023) 1, arXiv:2303.01817 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries,

    S. Schafer-Nameki, “ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries,” arXiv:2305.18296 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,

    T. D. Brennan and S. Hong, “Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,” arXiv:2306.00912 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    Lectures on Generalized Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, “Lectures on Generalized Symmetries,” arXiv:2307.07547 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetry,

    S.-H. Shao, “What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetry,” arXiv:2308.00747 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    Topological defects,

    N. Carqueville, M. Del Zotto, and I. Runkel, “Topological defects,” 11, 2023. arXiv:2311.02449 [math-ph] . 73

    2023 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries,

    D. Costa et al., “Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries,” 11, 2024. arXiv:2411.09082 [math-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Obstructions to Gapped Phases from Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    A. Apte, C. Cordova, and H. T. Lam, “Obstructions to Gapped Phases from Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2212.14605 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    SymTFT for (3+1)d Gapless SPTs and Obstructions to Confinement,

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “SymTFT for (3+1)d Gapless SPTs and Obstructions to Confinement,” 8, 2024

    2024

  69. [77]

    Interacting fermionic topological insulators/superconductors in three dimensions,

    C. Wang and T. Senthil, “Interacting fermionic topological insulators/superconductors in three dimensions,” Phys. Rev. B 89 no. 19, (2014) 195124, arXiv:1401.1142 [cond-mat.str-el] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.B 91, 239902 (2015)]

    2014 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Composite fermi liquids in the lowest Landau level,

    C. Wang and T. Senthil, “Composite fermi liquids in the lowest Landau level,” Phys. Rev. B 94 no. 24, (2016) 245107, arXiv:1604.06807 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2016 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Composite fermion duality for half-filled multicomponent Landau Levels,

    I. Sodemann, I. Kimchi, C. Wang, and T. Senthil, “Composite fermion duality for half-filled multicomponent Landau Levels,” Phys. Rev. B 95 no. 8, (2017) 085135, arXiv:1609.08616 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2017 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Deconfined quantum critical points: symmetries and dualities,

    C. Wang, A. Nahum, M. A. Metlitski, C. Xu, and T. Senthil, “Deconfined quantum critical points: symmetries and dualities,” Phys. Rev. X 7 no. 3, (2017) 031051, arXiv:1703.02426 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2017 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Fusion 3-Categories for Duality Defects,

    L. Bhardwaj, T. D´ ecoppet, S. Schafer-Nameki, and M. Yu, “Fusion 3-Categories for Duality Defects,” arXiv:2408.13302 [math.CT]

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Emergent Non-Invertible Symmetries Bridging UV and IR Phases – The Adjoint QCD Example,

    M. Del Zotto, S. N. Meynet, D. Migliorati, and K. Ohmori, “Emergent Non-Invertible Symmetries Bridging UV and IR Phases – The Adjoint QCD Example,” arXiv:2408.07123 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Representation Theory of Solitons,

    C. Cordova, N. Holfester, and K. Ohmori, “Representation Theory of Solitons,” arXiv:2408.11045 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Generalized Tube Algebras, Symmetry-Resolved Partition Functions, and Twisted Boundary States,

    Y. Choi, B. C. Rayhaun, and Y. Zheng, “Generalized Tube Algebras, Symmetry-Resolved Partition Functions, and Twisted Boundary States,” arXiv:2409.02159 [hep-th]

  77. [85]

    Defect Charges, Gapped Boundary Conditions, and the Symmetry TFT,

    C. Copetti, “Defect Charges, Gapped Boundary Conditions, and the Symmetry TFT,” arXiv:2408.01490 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  78. [86]

    Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality,

    A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg, “Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality,” JHEP 04 (2014) 001, arXiv:1401.0740 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, “Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2 no. 3, (2020) 033417, arXiv:1912.13492 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Orbifold groupoids,

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, “Orbifold groupoids,” JHEP 02 (2021) 132, arXiv:2008.05960 [hep-th] . 74

    2021 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. n. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 402 no. 1, (2023) 895–949, arXiv:2112.02092 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, “Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,” arXiv:2209.07471 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects,

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects,” Commun. Math. Phys. 404 no. 2, (2023) 1021–1124, arXiv:2209.11062 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  84. [92]

    On the Classification of Topological Orders,

    T. Johnson-Freyd, “On the Classification of Topological Orders,” Commun. Math. Phys. 393 no. 2, (2022) 989–1033, arXiv:2003.06663 [math.CT]

    2022 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Topological Orders in (4+1)-Dimensions,

    T. Johnson-Freyd and M. Yu, “Topological Orders in (4+1)-Dimensions,” SciPost Phys. 13 no. 3, (2022) 068, arXiv:2104.04534 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Classification of (3+1)D Bosonic Topological Orders: The Case When Pointlike Excitations Are All Bosons,

    T. Lan, L. Kong, and X.-G. Wen, “Classification of (3+1)D Bosonic Topological Orders: The Case When Pointlike Excitations Are All Bosons,” Phys. Rev. X 8 no. 2, (2018) 021074

    2018

  87. [95]

    Classification of topological phases with finite internal symmetries in all dimensions,

    L. Kong, T. Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang, and H. Zheng, “Classification of topological phases with finite internal symmetries in all dimensions,” JHEP 09 (2020) 093, arXiv:2003.08898 [math-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  88. [96]

    New phenomena in SU(3) supersymmetric gauge theory,

    P. C. Argyres and M. R. Douglas, “New phenomena in SU(3) supersymmetric gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 448 (1995) 93–126, arXiv:hep-th/9505062

    1995 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Anomaly of the Electromagnetic Duality of Maxwell Theory,

    C.-T. Hsieh, Y. Tachikawa, and K. Yonekura, “Anomaly of the Electromagnetic Duality of Maxwell Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 no. 16, (2019) 161601, arXiv:1905.08943 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Quantum Duality in Electromagnetism and the Fine-Structure Constant,

    C. Cordova and K. Ohmori, “Quantum Duality in Electromagnetism and the Fine-Structure Constant,” arXiv:2307.12927 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  91. [99]

    Topological dualities in the Ising model,

    D. S. Freed and C. Teleman, “Topological dualities in the Ising model,” Geom. Topol. 26 (2022) 1907–1984, arXiv:1806.00008 [math.AT]

    2022 arXiv

  92. [100]

    D. S. Freed, Lectures on Field Theory and Topology, vol. 133 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics . AMS, 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=Y6mn6ILOAN8C

    2019

  93. [101]

    Higher dimensional algebra and topological quantum field theory,

    J. C. Baez and J. Dolan, “Higher dimensional algebra and topological quantum field theory,” J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6073–6105, arXiv:q-alg/9503002

    1995 arXiv

  94. [102]

    On the Classification of Topological Field Theories,

    J. Lurie, “On the Classification of Topological Field Theories,” arXiv:0905.0465 [math.CT]

    arXiv

  95. [103]

    Relative quantum field theory,

    D. S. Freed and C. Teleman, “Relative quantum field theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 326 (2014) 459–476, arXiv:1212.1692 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Representation theory for categorical symmetries,

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, and A. Grigoletto, “Representation theory for categorical symmetries,” arXiv:2305.17165 [hep-th] . 75

    arXiv

  97. [105]

    Higher representations for extended operators,

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, and A. Grigoletto, “Higher representations for extended operators,” arXiv:2304.03789 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  98. [106]

    Symmetry Fractionalization, Defects, and Gauging of Topological Phases,

    M. Barkeshli, P. Bonderson, M. Cheng, and Z. Wang, “Symmetry Fractionalization, Defects, and Gauging of Topological Phases,” Phys. Rev. B 100 no. 11, (2019) 115147, arXiv:1410.4540 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2019 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Theory of Twist Liquids: Gauging an Anyonic Symmetry,

    J. C. Y. Teo, T. L. Hughes, and E. Fradkin, “Theory of Twist Liquids: Gauging an Anyonic Symmetry,” Annals Phys. 360 (2015) 349–445, arXiv:1503.06812 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2015 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Orbifolds of n-dimensional defect TQFTs,

    N. Carqueville, I. Runkel, and G. Schaumann, “Orbifolds of n-dimensional defect TQFTs,” Geom. Topol. 23 (2019) 781–864, arXiv:1705.06085 [math.QA]

    2019 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology,

    R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, “Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology,” Commun. Math. Phys. 129 (1990) 393

    1990

  102. [110]

    Dagger n-categories,

    G. Ferrer et al., “Dagger n-categories,” arXiv:2403.01651 [math.CT]

  103. [111]

    Condensations in higher categories,

    D. Gaiotto and T. Johnson-Freyd, “Condensations in higher categories,” arXiv:1905.09566 [math.CT]

    1905 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Cat´ egories Tannakiennes,

    P. Deligne, “Cat´ egories Tannakiennes,”Grothendieck Festschrift vol II. Progress in Mathematics 87 (1990) 111

    1990

  105. [113]

    Fusion 2-categories and a state-sum invariant for 4-manifolds,

    C. L. Douglas and D. J. Reutter, “Fusion 2-categories and a state-sum invariant for 4-manifolds,” arXiv:1812.11933 [math.QA]

    arXiv

  106. [114]

    Fusion 2-categories With no Line Operators are Grouplike,

    T. Johnson-Freyd and M. Yu, “Fusion 2-categories With no Line Operators are Grouplike,” Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 104 no. 3, (2021) 434–442, arXiv:2010.07950 [math.QA]

    2021 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Anomalies of discrete symmetries in various dimensions and group cohomology,

    A. Kapustin and R. Thorngren, “Anomalies of discrete symmetries in various dimensions and group cohomology,” arXiv:1404.3230 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  108. [116]

    Newman, Integral Matrices

    M. Newman, Integral Matrices. Elsevier Science, 1972

    1972

  109. [117]

    The holography of duality in N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills theory,

    O. Bergman and S. Hirano, “The holography of duality in N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills theory,” JHEP 11 (2022) 069, arXiv:2208.09396 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Q/Z symmetry,

    P. Putrov, “ Q/Z symmetry,” arXiv:2208.12071 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  111. [119]

    Global structures from the infrared,

    M. Del Zotto and I. n. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, “Global structures from the infrared,” JHEP 11 (2023) 058, arXiv:2204.06495 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  112. [120]

    On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, “On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,” JHEP 03 (2018) 189, arXiv:1704.02330 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Gapless Symmetry Protected Topological Order,

    T. Scaffidi, D. E. Parker, and R. Vasseur, “Gapless Symmetry Protected Topological Order,” Phys. Rev. X 7 no. 4, (2017) 041048, arXiv:1705.01557 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2017 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Hasse Diagrams for Gapless SPT and SSB Phases with Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, D. Pajer, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Warman, “Hasse Diagrams for Gapless SPT and SSB Phases with Non-Invertible Symmetries,” 3, 2024. 76

    2024

  115. [123]

    Tachikawa, N=2 supersymmetric dynamics for pedestrians

    Y. Tachikawa, N=2 supersymmetric dynamics for pedestrians . 12, 2013. arXiv:1312.2684 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  116. [124]

    A review of the TN theory and its cousins,

    Y. Tachikawa, “A review of the TN theory and its cousins,” PTEP 2015 no. 11, (2015) 11B102, arXiv:1504.01481 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Generalized global symmetries of T [M] theories. Part I,

    S. Gukov, P.-S. Hsin, and D. Pei, “Generalized global symmetries of T [M] theories. Part I,” JHEP 04 (2021) 232, arXiv:2010.15890 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  118. [126]

    N=2 dualities,

    D. Gaiotto, “N=2 dualities,” JHEP 08 (2012) 034, arXiv:0904.2715 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation,

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, “Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation,” Adv. Math. 234 (2013) 239–403, arXiv:0907.3987 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Four-Dimensional SCFTs from M5-Branes,

    I. Bah, C. Beem, N. Bobev, and B. Wecht, “Four-Dimensional SCFTs from M5-Branes,” JHEP 06 (2012) 005, arXiv:1203.0303 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Wrapped Branes and Punctured Horizons,

    N. Bobev, P. Bomans, and F. F. Gautason, “Wrapped Branes and Punctured Horizons,” JHEP 06 (2020) 011, arXiv:1912.04779 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Mosher and M

    R. Mosher and M. Tangora, Cohomology Operations and Applications in Homotopy Theory. Dover Books on Mathematics Series. Dover Publications, 2008. https://books.google.se/books?id=wu79f-7V_6AC

    2008

  123. [131]

    Hatcher, C

    A. Hatcher, C. U. Press, and C. U. D. of Mathematics, Algebraic Topology. Algebraic Topology. Cambridge University Press, 2002

    2002

  124. [132]

    Spectral sequences,

    A. Hatcher, “Spectral sequences,” 2004. https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/AT/SSpage.html

    2004

  125. [133]

    On the groups h(π,n ), ii: Methods of computation,

    S. Eilenberg and S. MacLane, “On the groups h(π,n ), ii: Methods of computation,” Annals of mathematics 60 no. 1, (1954) 49–139

    1954

  126. [134]

    Neukirch, Algebraic number theory, vol

    J. Neukirch, Algebraic number theory, vol. 322 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03983-0 . Translated from the 1992 German original and with a no...

    1999 doi

  127. [135]

    Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories,

    O. Aharony, N. Seiberg, and Y. Tachikawa, “Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories,” JHEP 08 (2013) 115, arXiv:1305.0318 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  128. [136]

    D. A. Buell, Binary Quadratic Forms: Classical Theory and Modern Computations. Springer New York, New York, NY, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4542-1

    1989 doi

  129. [137]

    https://www.sagemath.org

    The Sage Developers, SageMath, the Sage Mathematics Software System (Version 10.2), 2023. https://www.sagemath.org

    2023

  130. [138]

    On binary sextics with linear transformations into themselves,

    O. Bolza, “On binary sextics with linear transformations into themselves,” American Journal of Mathematics 10 no. 1, (1887) 47–70. 77

  131. [139]

    Ueber die Transformation siebenter Ordnung der elliptischen Functionen,

    F. Klein, “Ueber die Transformation siebenter Ordnung der elliptischen Functionen,” Mathematische Annalen 14 (09, 1878) 428–471

  132. [140]

    Klein’s Curve,

    H. W. Braden and T. P. Northover, “Klein’s Curve,” J. Phys. A 43 (2010) 434009, arXiv:0905.4202 [math.AG]

    2010 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Hensel’s lemma

    K. Conrad, “Hensel’s lemma.” https://kconrad.math.uconn.edu/blurbs/gradnumthy/hensel.pdf. 78

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.