Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Evolution of cavities in BCC-Fe with coexisting H and He under fusion environments

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read When hydrogen and helium coexist in BCC iron, cavities evolve into a stable core-shell configuration—He at the center, H on the surface—and H trapping remains possible above 600 K once the matrix H concentration passes a critical threshold.

desk verdict The core-shell mechanism is likely robust, but the paper's quantitative claims rest on an unvalidated hybrid potential and single trajectories, so treat thresholds as provisional until the potential is benchmarked. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19528 v1 pith:VSJP45OF submitted 2025-04-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.atm-clusphysics.atom-ph

Jin Wang , Fengping Luo , Tao Zheng , Bowen Zhang , Yuxin Liu , Denghuang Chen , Xinyue Xie , Mohan Chen
show 5 more authors
Hong-Bo Zhou Fei Gao Jianming Xue Yugang Wang Chenxu Wang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.atm-clusphysics.atom-ph
keywords H-Hesynergiestrappingeffectscore-shellstructuremoleculardynamicsthermodynamictheoryBCCironcavityevolutionfusionstructuralmaterials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that when hydrogen and helium are both present in body-centered cubic (BCC) iron—the situation in fusion-reactor steels—cavities do not just absorb gas randomly; they settle into a predictable core-shell configuration. Helium atoms sit stably at the cavity center, while hydrogen atoms prefer the cavity surface, and this geometry is produced by both molecular-dynamics kinetics and a Gibbs free-energy stability condition. A second claim is that the widely cited 600 K hydrogen de-trapping temperature is not an absolute limit: above 600 K, cavities still trap hydrogen as long as the matrix hydrogen concentration exceeds a critical value that grows with temperature. If these claims hold, fusion-relevant steels at high hydrogen production rates can retain hydrogen in cavities even at elevated irradiation temperatures, and the halo-core contrast seen in electron microscopy of irradiated steels has a concrete atomic mechanism.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by two coupled instruments. The first is a newly assembled three-species Fe-H-He empirical potential: an s-band many-body Fe-He description, an embedded-atom-method Fe-H potential that reproduces DFT-level H-H and H$_2$ behavior, a short-range repulsive H-He pair potential, and a compatible He-He pair form. It lets the authors run nanosecond-scale kinetic simulations with cyclic H/He insertion and a vacuum layer that allows atoms to escape, so trapping and de-trapping are both observable in one run. The second instrument is a statistical-thermodynamic stability condition, $\Delta G(x,y,z) = -\sum_l E_b^H(l,y,z) - x k_B T \ln[C_H/(1-C_H)]$, built from H binding energies and the bulk H concentration: when the reversible work of adding one more H atom to the cavity is negative, trapping is spontaneous. Taken together, these convert a static ground-state picture of bubble energetics into a temperature- and concentration-dependent rule for cavity evolution.

What would settle it

One decisive check would be a direct comparison at 723 K and 973 K between this potential's predictions and a DFT-trained machine-learning potential for Fe-H-He: if a cavity with He/V = 0.5 does not retain an H surface shell above the critical concentration, or if the predicted critical H concentration shifts by more than an order of magnitude, the core-shell conclusion fails. Experimentally, one could irradiate a ferritic/martensitic steel with He and H so that the matrix H concentration at 723 K exceeds roughly 10 appm and look for an H halo around He-filled cavities by electron energy-loss spectroscopy; its absence would contradict the thermodynamic threshold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that an H-He-vacancy cavity in BCC-Fe evolves into a stable core-shell structure: He is trapped at the cavity center because He-vacancy binding (about 2 eV) dominates, while H binds more weakly (about 0.75 eV) and therefore decorates the inner and outer cavity surfaces, which are low-electron-density regions. The molecular-dynamics simulations show this for temperatures 300–973 K, cavity radii 0.57–2.86 nm, and He/V ratios of 0, 0.5, and 0.8, with H$_2$ molecules forming in the cavity interior at intermediate temperatures and low He/V ratios. Statistical thermodynamics then supplies the quantitative condition: H trapping by a cavity is spontaneous, with $\Delta G < 0$, when the matrix H concentration exceeds a critical threshold—about 10 atomic parts per million (appm) at 723 K and 100 appm at 973 K—even though both higher He/V ratio and higher temperature make trapping harder. This reconciles the old rule that H detraps above 600 K with experiments that observe H halos at 723 K, and it explains why the experimentally seen core-shell contrast is the expected steady state.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the newly assembled Fe-H-He potential describes H/He/Fe interactions accurately at the high temperatures, high concentrations, and cavity surfaces studied here, even though the paper reports no direct benchmark of this combined potential against density-functional theory or experiments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Above 600 K, hydrogen retention by cavities becomes concentration-limited rather than absolutely forbidden; around 723 K a matrix H concentration of roughly 10 appm is enough to keep trapping thermodynamically spontaneous.
  • Triple-beam irradiation experiments at high H/He production rates should expect H-He-V cavities to display a He-rich core and an H-rich surface shell, with the H shell detectable at the cavity periphery.
  • Increasing the He/V ratio suppresses H$_2$ formation in the cavity interior, but the pressure-driven expansion of the cavity surface and the surrounding strain field add H-trapping sites, so hydrogen retention moves outward to the shell.
  • Interstitial H in the matrix promotes the formation of hydrogen-tagged helium-vacancy clusters outside cavities, creating competing traps and reducing H/He accumulation in pre-existing cavities.
  • An intermediate temperature near 723 K maximizes hydrogen storage in cavities because it balances thermal activation of H$_2$ formation against escape of interstitial H.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: the same Gibbs criterion predicts that the critical He/V ratio for H trapping shifts upward as matrix H concentration increases, so a concentration-temperature phase diagram for the H shell could be drawn from this model.
  • The concentration-threshold logic implies that post-irradiation cooling history matters: H retained on cavity surfaces during irradiation can redistribute or de-trap as the matrix H concentration drops, so ex-situ measurements may undercount the H that was present in service.
  • If the core-shell structure is the long-time attractor, then cavity swelling models for ferritic/martensitic steels should treat the H shell as part of the cavity pressure balance, since H$_2$ in the interior and H adsorbed on surfaces contribute differently to stress.
  • The same hybrid potential and free-energy criterion could be applied to H/He behavior at grain boundaries, where the competition between He core trapping and H surface trapping may set incubation times for boundary bubble arrays.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper combines molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with a statistical thermodynamic model to study the evolution of H and He atoms trapped in pre-existing cavities in BCC Fe. The authors assemble a hybrid Fe-H-He interatomic potential from previously published Fe-He, Fe-H, He-He, and H-He potentials. MD simulations with cyclic insertion of H and He at a 4:1 ratio show that He forms a core-like distribution at the cavity center while H forms a shell near the cavity surface, with H2 molecules forming inside the cavity at higher temperatures. A thermodynamic model based on DFT binding energies from prior work predicts that H trapping by cavities is favorable at temperatures above 600 K provided the matrix H concentration exceeds a critical value (~10 appm at 723 K and ~100 appm at 973 K). The authors argue that these results explain experimental observations of core-shell H-He-V cavities in ion-irradiated RAFM steels.

Significance. If the assembled potential is quantitatively reliable, the study provides a plausible kinetic mechanism for the experimentally observed core-shell structure and yields a falsifiable thermodynamic condition for H retention at elevated temperatures. The thermodynamic analysis is based on independent DFT data rather than the MD potential, which is a strength. However, the central MD results are not validated against reference calculations or experiments, and all quantitative outcomes derive from single trajectories, so the significance is currently conditional on these caveats.

major comments (4)
  1. [2.1] The assembled Fe-H-He hybrid potential is not validated anywhere in the manuscript. The text states that 'the final interatomic potential was derived by fitting the functional forms of these potentials along with their associated parameters' but provides no fitting procedure, no parameter values, and no benchmark against DFT (e.g., the Wu deep potential [30]), DFT-based binding energies, or experiments. The central kinetic claims—that H forms a stable shell on the cavity surface and that H2 molecules form in the cavity center (Secs. 3.1.2 and 3.2, Figs. 4-8)—depend directly on the accuracy of H-surface and H-H interactions in this potential. The authors themselves note that the earlier Ramasubramaniam Fe-H potential overestimated H-H attraction and produced artificial clustering (Ref. 26), demonstrating the sensitivity of such MD results to the potential. Without validation, the core-shell picture is not established.
  2. [3.1-3.2] All reported concentrations, capture efficiencies, and H2 counts (e.g., capture efficiencies in Figs. 2 and 4, H2 counts in Fig. 5(d), and CH values in Fig. 7) are obtained from single MD trajectories. No error bars, multiple independent runs, or statistical measures are reported. Given the stochastic insertion scheme and the finite system size (2.5x10^5 Fe atoms), quantitative trends such as the claim that 723 K maximizes H2 formation (Fig. 5(d)) may be sensitive to initial conditions and thermal noise. This undermines the quantitative nature of the kinetic evidence.
  3. [4.2, Eq. (8)] The thermodynamic model is based on binding energies from previous DFT studies [25,62], not from the MD potential used in the kinetic simulations. While this independence is a strength, the paper claims that the thermodynamic calculations 'provide substantial support' for the MD results, yet the two frameworks use different energy surfaces, so only qualitative agreement can be expected. More importantly, the thermodynamic model assumes a stable cavity with a constant He/V ratio (Eq. 8), whereas in the MD simulations the He/V ratio increases as He is trapped. The critical concentration thresholds (~10 appm at 723 K, ~100 appm at 973 K, Figs. 10-11) are therefore not directly comparable to the MD conditions, and their sensitivity to the assumed binding energies is not assessed.
  4. [2.3] The cyclic insertion scheme introduces H and He at extremely high rates (up to 16,000 appm H and 4,000 appm He over 20 ns). The authors acknowledge that the rates exceed experimental values, but the consequences for the observed H2 formation and shell structure are not discussed. It is plausible that the high insertion rate drives the system into an oversaturated regime where H2 formation is artificially enhanced. A discussion of this limitation, or tests at lower insertion rates, is needed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract/Conclusion] The phrase 'strong consistency with experimental results' is overly strong; the comparison with experiment is qualitative (Sec. 4), based mainly on the general core-shell morphology rather than quantitative distributions or concentrations.
  2. [2.1] The manuscript should clarify whether each component potential is used with its original published parameters or whether any refitting was performed; as written, the description of the 'fitting' is opaque and prevents reproduction.
  3. [4.2] In the sentence beginning 'Clowers et al. [10] provided clear evidence...', the phrase 'at irradiation temperature' appears twice; this editorial error should be fixed.
  4. [Fig. 5] The panel labels in Fig. 5 are not defined in the caption; the reader must infer that panels (a-c) correspond to 300 K, 723 K, and 973 K from the text. Please add explicit labels.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: kinetic MD is independent of the thermodynamic model; the self-cited DFT binding energies are inputs, not fitted predictions.

full rationale

The central core-shell observation comes from MD trajectories run with an assembled Fe-H-He potential and is not imposed by the thermodynamics in Sec. 4.2. Eq. 8 computes the Gibbs free energy for H trapping using E_b^H(l,y,z) binding energies taken from prior DFT studies [25,62]; these are external, parameter-free first-principles inputs rather than quantities fitted to the paper's own MD snapshots or to the claimed critical concentrations (10 appm at 723 K, 100 appm at 973 K). The MD and thermodynamic analyses therefore provide independent evidence, and the reported agreement with experimental EELS halo-core observations is an external benchmark. The unspecified fitting of the hybrid potential and the lack of DFT benchmarking in this paper are validity and accuracy concerns, not circularity: nothing in the text shows the core-shell distribution or the thermodynamic thresholds being inserted into the potential or into the free-energy formula by construction. The only circularity-adjacent feature is that the thermodynamic threshold and the statement that He trapping is more favorable than H trapping lean on the authors' own earlier DFT papers [25,62], but those papers contain stated assumptions that do not include the present target result. This is a minor self-citation dependence, not a forced reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entity, particle, or force is introduced. The 'core-shell' and 'halo' terms describe spatial arrangements of known atoms, not new entities.

free parameters (1)
  • Hybrid Fe-H-He potential fitting parameters = not disclosed
    Section 2.1 says the final potential was derived by fitting functional forms and associated parameters, but the fit values and fit data are not reported. All MD results depend on this fitted potential.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The assembled Fe-H-He hybrid potential accurately models H, He, and Fe interactions in BCC-Fe under simulated temperatures and concentrations.
    Section 2.1; every MD result depends on this potential, yet the paper provides no direct validation of the assembled set.
  • domain assumption The ideal-solution entropy expression in Eq. (6) and the neglect of vacancy/He terms in Eq. (8) are valid for pre-existing cavities.
    Section 4.2; the critical H concentration thresholds follow from this entropy model and simplification.
  • domain assumption The H-cavity binding energies E_b^H(l,y,z) from prior studies [25,62] are accurate and transferable to the simulated cavity sizes and He/V ratios.
    Section 4.2, Eq. (8); the thermodynamic support for H trapping rests on these externally computed values.
  • domain assumption Vacuum boundary layers and cyclic insertion at high rates reproduce the qualitative behavior of continuous irradiation in a semi-infinite matrix.
    Section 2.3; the model allows H/He escape through vacuum layers and uses 100 insertion cycles over 20 ns, far above experimental rates, and the paper acknowledges this in Sec. 4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evolution of cavities in BCC-Fe with coexisting H and He under fusion environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VSJP45OF

@misc{pith2026250419528,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evolution of cavities in BCC-Fe with coexisting H and He under fusion environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VSJP45OF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19528}
}
read the original abstract

In the fusion environment, understanding the synergistic effects of transmutation-produced hydrogen (H), helium (He), and irradiation-induced displacement damage in iron-based alloys is crucial for the development of structural materials for fusion reactors. When H and He atoms are simultaneously introduced into the matrix, the interaction between irradiation-induced cavity defects (voids and bubbles) with H and He, along with their evolutionary behavior remains poorly understood. In this study, the evolutionary behavior of cavities in body-centered cubic (BCC) iron (Fe) with H and He atoms is systematically investigated through a combination of molecular dynamics (MD) calculations and statistical thermodynamics. First, an efficient and suitable set of Fe-H-He ternary potential functions for describing interatomic interactions is established. Based on the newly developed MD model, the evolutionary behavior of H/He atoms and cavities is systematically investigated under various temperature and cavity structure conditions. Specifically, the kinetic process of H/He capture by cavities is elucidated for different scenarios. Additionally, thermodynamic analyses are employed to assess the feasibility of cavity trapping of H under varying conditions. The results exhibit strong consistency with experimental results and provide significant evidence supporting the formation of the core-shell structure (where He is confined at the cavity center while H accumulates at the surface) from both kinetic and thermodynamic perspectives. This work provides mechanistic insights into the nucleation and growth of cavities over extended temporal and spatial scales in the presence of H-He synergies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19528 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Principal flowchart of the simulation process (a) and schematic diagram of the model construction (b-d). (b) The conformational diagram of H and He atoms in the matrix of BCC-Fe containing a cavity, and the region of 10 times the lattice constant beyond the atomic configuration is identified as the vacuum layer. (c) The constructed cavities are characterized by using Constructing Surface Mesh, with the surfaces of t… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [30]

    F. Wu, Z. Liu, Y. Chen, X. Guo, J. Xue, Y. Li, H. Huang, H. Zhou, H. Deng, Deep learning-based neural network potential for investigating the synergistic effect of H and He in BCC -Fe, Comput. Mater. Sci. 246 (2025) 113434. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2024.113434

    arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    Zinkle, J.T

    S.J. Zinkle, J.T. Busby, Structural materials for fission & fusion energy, Mater. Today 12 (2009) 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(09)70294-9

    doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(09)70294-9 2009

  3. [2]

    Zinkle, G.S

    S.J. Zinkle, G.S. Was, Materials challenges in nuclear energy, Acta Mater. 61 (2013) 735–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004

    doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004 2013

  4. [4]

    Sekimura, T

    N. Sekimura, T. Iwai, Y. Arai, S. Yonamine, A. Naito, Y. Miwa, S. Hamada, Synergistic effects of hydrogen and helium on microstructural evolution in vanadium alloys by triple ion beam irradiation, J. Nucl. Mater. 283 –287 (2000) 224–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00341-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-3115(00)00341-x 2000

  5. [5]

    Wakai, T

    E. Wakai, T. Sawai, K. Furuya, A. Naito, T. Aruga, K. Kikuchi, S. Yamashita, S. Ohnuki, S. Yamamoto, H. Naramoto, S. Jistukawa, Effect of triple ion beams in ferritic/martensitic steel on swelling behavior, J. Nucl. Mater. 307–311 (2002) 278–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(02)01076-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-3115(02)01076-0 2002

  6. [6]

    Wakai, K

    E. Wakai, K. Kikuchi, S. Yamamoto, T. Aruga, M. Ando, H. Tanigawa, T. Taguchi, T. Sawai, K. Oka, S. Ohnuki, Swelling behavior of F82H steel irradiated by triple/dual ion beams, J. Nucl. Mater. 318 (2003) 267 –273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(03)00122-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-3115(03)00122-3 2003

  7. [7]

    Tanaka, K

    T. Tanaka, K. Oka, S. Ohnuki, S. Yamashita, T. Suda, S. Watanabe, E. Wakai, Synergistic effect of helium and hydrogen for defect evolution under multi -ion irradiation of Fe -Cr ferritic alloys, J. Nucl. Mater. 329 –333 (2004) 294 –298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.051

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.051 2004

  8. [8]

    Roldá n, P

    M. Roldá n, P. Ferná ndez, R. Vila, A. Gó mez-Herrero, F.J. Sá nchez, The effect of triple ion beam irradiation on cavity formation on pure EFDA iron, J. Nucl. Mater. 479 (2016) 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.06.043

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.06.043 2016

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Jiang, Q

    L. Jiang, Q. Peng, P. Xiu, Y. Yan, Z. Jiao, C. Lu, T. Liu, C. Ye, R. Shu, Y. Liao, Q. Ren, F. Gao, L. Wang, Elucidating He -H assisted cavity evolution in alpha Cr under multiple ion beam irradiation, Scr. Mater. 187 (2020) 291 –295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.06.031

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    Clowers, Z

    L.N. Clowers, Z. Jiao, G.S. Was, Synergies between H, He and radiation damage in dual and triple ion irradiation of candidate fusion blanket materials, J. Nucl. Mater. 565 (2022) 153722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.153722

    2022

  3. [11]

    Clowers, G.S

    L.N. Clowers, G.S. Was, The effect of hydrogen co -injection on the microstructure of triple ion irradiated F82H, J. Nucl. Mater. 601 (2024) 155331. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2024.155331

    2024

  4. [12]

    Tolstolutskaya, V

    G.D. Tolstolutskaya, V. V. Ruzhytskiy, I.E. Kopanets, S.A. Karpov, V. V. Bryk, V.N. Voyevodin, F.A. Garner, Displacement and helium -induced enhancement of hydrogen and deuterium retention in ion-irradiated 18Cr10NiTi stainless steel, J. Nucl. Mater. 356 (2006) 136 –147. https...

    2006 doi

  5. [13]

    Garner, E.P

    F.A. Garner, E.P. Simonen, B.M. Oliver, L.R. Greenwood, M.L. Grossbeck, W.G. Wolfer, P.M. Scott, Retention of hydrogen in fcc metals irradiated at temperatures leading to high densities of bubbles or voids, J. Nucl. Mater. 356 (2006) 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat....

    2006 doi

  6. [14]

    Zimber, J

    N. Zimber, J. Lammer, P. Vladimirov, G. Kothleitner, V.J. Keast, M. Dü rrschnabel, M. Klimenkov, Hydrogen and helium trapping in hcp beryllium, Commun. Chem. 6 (2023) 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-023-00877-7

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Klueh, D.S

    R.L. Klueh, D.S. Gelles, S. Jitsukawa, A. Kimura, G.R. Odette, B. Van der Schaaf, M. Victoria, Ferritic/martensitic steels - Overview of recent results, J. Nucl. Mater. 307 –311 (2002) 455 –465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022 - 3115(02)01082-6

    2002 doi

  8. [16]

    Huang, N

    Q. Huang, N. Baluc, Y. Dai, S. Jitsukawa, A. Kimura, J. Konys, R.J. Kurtz, R. Lindau, T. Muroga, G.R. Odette, B. Raj, R.E. Stoller, L. Tan, H. Tanigawa, A.A.F. Tavassoli, T. Yamamoto, F. Wan, Y. Wu, Recent progress of R&D activities on reduced activat ion ferritic/martensitic ...

    2013 doi

  9. [17]

    Tavassoli, E

    A.A.F. Tavassoli, E. Diegele, R. Lindau, N. Luzginova, H. Tanigawa, Current status and recent research achievements in ferritic/martensitic steels, J. Nucl. Mater. 455 (2014) 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.017

    2014 doi

  10. [18]

    Zimber, P

    N. Zimber, P. Vladimirov, M. Klimenkov, U. Jä ntsch, R. Vila, V. Chakin, F. Mota, Microstructural evolution of three potential fusion candidate steels under ion-irradiation, J. Nucl. Mater. 535 (2020) 152160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2020.152160

    2020

  11. [19]

    Marian, T

    J. Marian, T. Hoang, M. Fluss, L.L. Hsiung, A review of helium -hydrogen synergistic effects in radiation damage observed in fusion energy steels and an interaction model to guide future understanding, J. Nucl. Mater. 462 (2015) 409–

    2015

  12. [20]

    Myers, F

    S.M. Myers, F. Besenbacher, J. Bottiger, Deuterium in He -implanted Fe: Trapping and the surface permeation barrier, Appl. Phys. Lett. 39 (1981) 450 –

    1981

  13. [21]

    Hirth, Effects of hydrogen on the properties of iron and steel, Metall

    J.P. Hirth, Effects of hydrogen on the properties of iron and steel, Metall. Trans. A 11 (1980) 861–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02654700

    1980 doi

  14. [22]

    Ortiz, R

    C.J. Ortiz, R. Vila, J.M. Pruneda, Ab initio study of helium and hydrogen interactions in α-Fe, (2012) 1–5. http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.6374

    2012 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Z. Chen, L. Yang, X. Hu, B.D. Wirth, M. Ye, MD simulation of the He bubble effect on H retention in BCC iron, Fusion Eng. Des. 180 (2022) 113184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2022.113184

    2022

  16. [25]

    F. Luo, J. Huang, Q. Liu, Z. Gao, W. Ge, F. Gao, Y. Wang, C. Wang, Dynamic investigations on hydrogen-helium interaction around the vacancy in BCC iron from ab -initio calculations, Nucl. Fusion 63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/acb4ab

    2023 doi

  17. [26]

    Ramasubramaniam, M

    A. Ramasubramaniam, M. Itakura, E.A. Carter, Interatomic potentials for hydrogen in α -iron based on density functional theory, Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 79 (2009) 1 –13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.174101

    2009 doi

  18. [27]

    Song, W.A

    J. Song, W.A. Curtin, Atomic mechanism and prediction of hydrogen embrittlement in iron, Nat. Mater. 12 (2013) 145 –151. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3479

    2013 doi

  19. [28]

    Wen, A new interatomic potential describing Fe -H and H-H interactions in bcc iron, Comput

    M. Wen, A new interatomic potential describing Fe -H and H-H interactions in bcc iron, Comput. Mater. Sci. 197 (2021) 110640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110640

    2021

  20. [29]

    Binyukova, I.I

    S.Y. Binyukova, I.I. Chernov, B.A. Kalin, T. Swe, Effectiveness of helium bubbles as traps for hydrogen, J. Nucl. Mater. 367 –370 (2007) 500 –504. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2007.03.110

    2007 doi

  21. [31]

    D. Lu, W. Jiang, Y. Chen, L. Zhang, W. Jia, H. Wang, M. Chen, DP Compress: A Model Compression Scheme for Generating Efficient Deep Potential Models, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18 (2022) 5559 –5567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00102

    2022 doi

  22. [32]

    Huang, Y.H

    H.X. Huang, Y.H. Li, T.R. Yang, H.B. Zhou, J.L. Li, H.Z. Ma, Y.Z. Niu, X.C. Li, H. Deng, G.H. Lu, Investigating the synergistic evolution of H and He with irradiation defects in Fe by a new Fe-H-He ternary potential, J. Nucl. Mater. 607 (2025) 155687. https://doi.org/10.1016/J...

    2025

  23. [33]

    Thompson, H.M

    A.P. Thompson, H.M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D.S. Bolintineanu, W.M. Brown, P.S. Crozier, P.J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S.G. Moore, T.D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M.J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, S.J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle -based materials modeling...

    2022

  24. [34]

    F. Gao, H. Deng, H.L. Heinisch, R.J. Kurtz, A new Fe -He interatomic potential based on ab initio calculations in α -Fe, J. Nucl. Mater. 418 (2011) 115 –120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.06.008

    2011 doi

  25. [35]

    Mendelev, S

    M.I. Mendelev, S. Han, D.J. Srolovitz, G.J. Ackland, D.Y. Sun, M. Asta, Development of new interatomic potentials appropriate for crystalline and liquid iron, Philos. Mag. 83 (2003) 3977 –3994. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430310001613264

    2003 doi

  26. [36]

    Ackland, M.I

    G.J. Ackland, M.I. Mendelev, D.J. Srolovitz, S. Han, A. V. Barashev, Development of an interatomic potential for phosphorus impurities in α -iron, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 16 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/16/27/003

    2004 doi

  27. [37]

    Aziz, A.R

    R.A. Aziz, A.R. Janzen, M.R. Moldover, Ab initio calculations for helium: A standard for transport property measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 1586–

    1995

  28. [38]

    Pitike, W

    K.C. Pitike, W. Setyawan, Accurate Fe –He machine learning potential for studying He effects in BCC -Fe, J. Nucl. Mater. 574 (2023) 154183. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2022.154183

    2023

  29. [39]

    Y. Hu, L. Peng, J. Shi, L. Li, Y. Sun, S. Chen, Y. Wan, The temperature effect on the formation and growth of helium -vacancy clusters in bcc iron: A comprehensive molecular dynamics simulation, J. Nucl. Mater. 597 (2024) 155130. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2024.155130

    2024

  30. [40]

    L. Yang, F. Gao, R.J. Kurtz, X.T. Zu, Atomistic simulations of helium clustering and grain boundary reconstruction in alpha-iron, Acta Mater. 82 (2015) 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2014.09.015

    2015 doi

  31. [41]

    L. Yang, F. Gao, R.J. Kurtz, X.T. Zu, S.M. Peng, X.G. Long, X.S. Zhou, Effects of local structure on helium bubble growth in bulk and at grain boundaries of bcc iron: A molecular dynamics study, Acta Mater. 97 (2015) 86 –93. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2015.06.055

    2015 doi

  32. [42]

    R. Wang, L. Cheng, C. Yin, W. Lou, K. Wu, The effects of hydrogen and vacancy on the tensile deformation behavior of Σ3 symmetric tilt grain boundaries in pure fe, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48 (2023) 30930 –30948. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2023.04.186

    2023 doi

  33. [43]

    Kapci, P

    M.F. Kapci, P. Yu, J. Marian, G. Liu, Y. Shen, Y. Li, B. Bal, Edge dislocation depinning from hydrogen atmosphere in α-iron, Scr. Mater. 247 (2024) 116094. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCRIPTAMAT.2024.116094

    2024

  34. [44]

    Hasan, M.F

    M.S. Hasan, M.F. Kapci, B. Bal, M. Koyama, H. Bayat, W. Xu, An atomistic study on the HELP mechanism of hydrogen embrittlement in pure metal Fe, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 57 (2024) 60 –68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2023.12.274

    2024 doi

  35. [45]

    Thompson, S.J

    A.P. Thompson, S.J. Plimpton, W. Mattson, General formulation of pressure and stress tensor for arbitrary many -body interaction potentials under periodic boundary conditions, J. Chem. Phys. 131 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3245303

    2009 doi

  36. [46]

    Rycroft, VORO++: A three -dimensional Voronoi cell library in C++, Chaos 19 (2009)

    C.H. Rycroft, VORO++: A three -dimensional Voronoi cell library in C++, Chaos 19 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3215722

    2009 doi

  37. [47]

    Gilbert, K

    M.R. Gilbert, K. Arakawa, Z. Bergstrom, M.J. Caturla, S.L. Dudarev, F. Gao, A.M. Goryaeva, S.Y. Hu, X. Hu, R.J. Kurtz, A. Litnovsky, J. Marian, M.C. Marinica, E. Martinez, E.A. Marquis, D.R. Mason, B.N. Nguyen, P. Olsson, Y. Osetskiy, D. Senor, W. Set yawan, M.P. Short, T. Suz...

    2021

  38. [48]

    Torres, C

    E. Torres, C. Judge, H. Rajakumar, A. Korinek, J. Pencer, G. Bickel, Atomistic simulations and experimental measurements of helium nano -bubbles in nickel, J. Nucl. Mater. 495 (2017) 475 –483. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2017.08.044

    2017 doi

  39. [49]

    Hatton, D

    P. Hatton, D. Perez, T. Frolov, B.P. Uberuaga, He bubble -induced phase transformation of W grain boundaries revealed by accelerated molecular dynamics, Acta Mater. 269 (2024) 119821. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2024.119821

    2024

  40. [50]

    Brimbal, B

    D. Brimbal, B. Dé camps, J. Henry, E. Meslin, A. Barbu, Single- and dual-beam in situ irradiations of high -purity iron in a transmission electron microscope: Effects of heavy ion irradiation and helium injection, Acta Mater. 64 (2014) 391–

    2014

  41. [51]

    Fré chard, M

    S. Fré chard, M. Walls, M. Kociak, J.P. Chevalier, J. Henry, D. Gorse, Study by EELS of helium bubbles in a martensitic steel, J. Nucl. Mater. 393 (2009) 102 –

    2009

  42. [52]

    Zinkle, L.L

    S.J. Zinkle, L.L. Snead, Designing radiation resistance in materials for fusion energy, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 44 (2014) 241 –267. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113627

    2014 doi

  43. [53]

    Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the Open Visualization Tool, Model

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the Open Visualization Tool, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012

    2010 doi

  44. [54]

    Zhou, J.L

    H.B. Zhou, J.L. Wang, W. Jiang, G.H. Lu, J.A. Aguiar, F. Liu, Electrophobic interaction induced impurity clustering in metals, Acta Mater. 119 (2016) 1 –8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2016.08.005

    2016 doi

  45. [55]

    C.C. Fu, F. Willaime, Ab initio study of helium in α-Fe: Dissolution, migration, and clustering with vacancies, Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 72 (2005) 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.064117

    2005 doi

  46. [56]

    Hayward, C.C

    E. Hayward, C.C. Fu, Interplay between hydrogen and vacancies in α -Fe, Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 87 (2013) 1 –14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.174103

    2013 doi

  47. [57]

    Hayward, R

    E. Hayward, R. Hayward, C.C. Fu, Predicting distinct regimes of hydrogen behavior at nano -cavities in metals, J. Nucl. Mater. 476 (2016) 36 –44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.04.029

    2016 doi

  48. [58]

    Hou, X.S

    J. Hou, X.S. Kong, C.S. Liu, J. Song, Hydrogen clustering in bcc metals: Atomic origin and strong stress anisotropy, Acta Mater. 201 (2020) 23 –35. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2020.09.048

    2020 doi

  49. [59]

    Hou, X.S

    J. Hou, X.S. Kong, J. Sun, Y.W. You, X. Wu, C.S. Liu, J. Song, Hydrogen bubble nucleation by self -clustering: Density functional theory and statistical model studies using tungsten as a model system, Nucl. Fusion 58 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aacdb6

    2018 doi

  50. [60]

    Hayward, C

    E. Hayward, C. Deo, Energetics of small hydrogen-vacancy clusters in bcc iron, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953 - 8984/23/42/425402

    2011 doi

  51. [61]

    Hou, X.S

    J. Hou, X.S. Kong, X. Wu, J. Song, C.S. Liu, Predictive model of hydrogen trapping and bubbling in nanovoids in bcc metals, Nat. Mater. 18 (2019) 833 –

    2019

  52. [62]

    F. Luo, B. Zhang, Z. Gao, J. Huang, H.B. Zhou, G.H. Lu, F. Gao, Y. Wang, C. Wang, Quantitative method to predict the energetics of helium -nanocavities interactions in metal systems based on electrophobic interaction, J. Mater. 10 (2024) 725–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAT...

    2024 doi

  53. [63]

    Granberg, K

    F. Granberg, K. Nordlund, M.W. Ullah, K. Jin, C. Lu, H. Bei, L.M. Wang, F. Djurabekova, W.J. Weber, Y. Zhang, Mechanism of Radiation Damage Reduction in Equiatomic Multicomponent Single Phase Alloys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.135504

    2016 doi

  54. [64]

    M. Jin, P. Cao, M.P. Short, Thermodynamic mixing energy and heterogeneous diffusion uncover the mechanisms of radiation damage reduction in single-phase Ni-Fe alloys, Acta Mater. 147 (2018) 16 –23. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2017.12.064

    2018 doi

  55. [107]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.05.011

    2009 doi

  56. [401]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.052

    2013 doi

  57. [421]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.046

    2014 doi

  58. [452]

    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.92735

    doi

  59. [839]

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0422-4

    doi

  60. [1589]

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1586

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.