Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 195 references

Complex Organic Molecules towards the central molecular zone of NGC 253

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Five interstellar organic molecules in NGC 253 trace two gas components, one cold and cloud-wide, one warm and compact.

desk verdict First resolved iCOM excitation study in an extragalactic starburst CMZ; the two-component GMC/pSSC split is plausible but not secured against non-LTE, so treat the quantitative column densities as conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19631 v1 pith:SELBD7ZL submitted 2025-04-28 astro-ph.GA

M. Bouvier , S. Viti , J. G. Mangum , C. Eibensteiner , E. Behrens , V. M. Rivilla , Á. López-Gallifa , S. Martín
show 4 more authors
N. Harada S. Muller L. Colzi K. Sakamoto
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords NGC253centralmolecularzoneinterstellarcomplexorganicmoleculesastrochemistrystarburstgalaxiessub-thermalexcitationgiantcloudsshockchemistry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses high-resolution millimetre observations of the central molecular zone of the nearby starburst galaxy NGC 253 to map five complex organic molecules—acetaldehyde, ethanol, formamide, methanimine, and methylamine—and asks where their emission comes from and what it traces. The authors find that the emission is concentrated in the inner part of the zone and cannot be explained by a single gas component: a cold, extended component at giant-molecular-cloud scales and a warmer, compact component at the scale of a few parsecs are both needed to reproduce the observed line intensities. If the two-component picture holds, it would mean that resolved extragalactic observations can recover the same shock-dominated, sub-thermally excited organic chemistry seen in the Galactic Center, and that individual molecular clouds in a starburst can differ chemically. The paper also reports chemical differences between the clouds, including a deficit of nitrogen-bearing species toward one cloud and different excitation for two species toward two other regions.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by rotational-diagram analysis of the detected transitions, in which line intensities are used to derive rotational temperatures and column densities under LTE and optically thin assumptions, with a beam-filling factor chosen from the assumed emission size. For CH2NH, a non-LTE large-velocity-gradient calculation with published collisional rates replaces the LTE assumption, and it returns a compact emission size of about 2.5–10 pc together with optical depths up to 3.4, showing that the simple assumptions fail for at least one species. Column-density correlation plots between chemically suspected pairs—CH3CHO/C2H5OH, CH3NH2/NH2CHO, and CH3NH2/CH2NH—provide the basis for the formation-path discussion.

What would settle it

Resolve the same transitions at sub-arcsecond angular resolution across the four regions: if the high-energy emission is spatially extended rather than concentrated at the pSSC positions, the two-scale decomposition fails; separately, measuring CH3NH2, CH3CHO, and NH2CHO with a non-LTE analysis that includes collisional rates would show whether their rotation-diagram two-component fits are artifacts of optical depth and sub-thermal excitation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Across the four surveyed regions of the NGC 253 central molecular zone, the emission of CH3CHO, C2H5OH, NH2CHO, CH2NH, and CH3NH2 is shown to be dominated by two distinct gas components. The lower-energy transitions trace cold gas ($T_{\rm rot}\lesssim 20$ K) at the scale of giant molecular clouds (about 27 pc), while higher-energy transitions require a warmer component ($T_{\rm rot}\sim 30$–80 K) concentrated on scales of a few parsecs, matching the sizes of proto-super-star clusters embedded in the clouds. The authors argue that at cloud scales the widespread, sub-thermally excited emission most plausibly traces large-scale shocks within the clouds, analogous to the Galactic Center, while at the smaller scales both shock and heating from ongoing star formation can act. They also find that column-density correlations support more than one formation path for the organic molecules, and that the four regions are not chemically identical: GMC 7 is depleted in nitrogen-bearing species relative to oxygen-bearing ones, and CH3CHO and NH2CHO show opposite excitation behaviour toward two of the pSSC positions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the cold low-energy and warm high-energy parts of each molecule's rotation diagram come from two physically separate spatial components—one at the ~27-pc cloud scale and one at the few-parsec pSSC scale—under LTE and optically thin emission; the paper's own non-LTE analysis of CH2NH finds optical depths up to 3.4 and non-LTE excitation, which shows these assumptions do not all hold for at least one species.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The iCOM emission toward the central molecular zone of NGC 253 is concentrated in the inner ~100 pc around the kinematic centre, between GMC 7 and pSSC 2.
  • All derived rotational temperatures are below 100 K, mostly 10–40 K, so the molecules are sub-thermally excited rather than tracing hot-core-like gas.
  • For CH2NH, the non-LTE analysis gives a compact emission size of 0.15–0.6 arcseconds (2.5–10 pc) and gas densities of 10^5–10^6 cm^-3, supporting the picture of emission from shocked, dense gas rather than from hot cores.
  • At GMC scales, the most favourable explanation is large-scale shocks within the clouds, which would make the organic chemistry of NGC 253 analogous to that of the Galactic Center.
  • The detected chemical differences between GMCs imply that individual clouds in a starburst nucleus can differ in nitrogen chemistry and excitation, and chemical models will need to reproduce those differences.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the shock interpretation is right, the same sub-thermally excited, shock-dominated iCOM chemistry should be observable toward other starburst nuclear zones with comparable beam sizes, and the N-bearing to O-bearing species ratio may serve as an approximate shock-age indicator.
  • The paper's two-scale attribution could be tested directly with higher angular resolution: if the warm high-energy component remains spatially extended at sub-arcsecond scales, the assignment of that component to few-parsec proto-clusters would need revision.
  • The column-density correlations used here could be turned into quantitative formation-path tests by running chemical models that simultaneously predict the ratios [C2H5OH/CH3CHO], [CH3NH2/NH2CHO], and [CH3NH2/CH2NH] under shock and non-shock conditions.
  • The failure of LTE and optically thin assumptions for CH2NH raises the possibility that the same failure affects the other species; measuring their collisional rates would allow the same non-LTE treatment and would check whether the two-component fits are excitation artifacts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper presents a resolved study of five interstellar complex organic molecules (CH3CHO, C2H5OH, NH2CHO, CH2NH, and CH3NH2) toward the central molecular zone of NGC 253, using 1.6 arcsec (about 27 pc) ALCHEMI ALMA data. The authors image the emission, fit Gaussian line parameters in four regions (GMC 7, GMC 6, pSSC 5, pSSC 2), and derive rotational temperatures and column densities from rotation diagrams under LTE and optically thin assumptions, with beam-filling factors corresponding to GMC scales (1.6 arcsec) and pSSC scales (0.12 arcsec). For CH2NH alone, they additionally perform a non-LTE LVG analysis. The central claim is that the iCOM emission can be reproduced by two gas components: a cold extended component at GMC scales and a warmer compact component at pSSC scales, with the GMC-scale component plausibly tracing large-scale shocks. The paper also reports column-density correlation trends and chemical differences between regions, including an O- versus N-bearing dichotomy toward GMC 7.

Significance. If the central interpretation is correct, this is one of the first resolved extragalactic studies showing that iCOM emission in a starburst CMZ can be decomposed into distinct physical scales and that the chemistry resembles the shock-dominated, sub-thermally excited iCOM chemistry of the Galactic Center. The paper is transparent and carefully hedged in several places: it uses public ALCHEMI data, provides extensive line tables and spectra in appendices, and includes a genuine non-LTE LVG analysis for CH2NH. The observational mapping of five iCOMs across individual GMCs in an external galaxy is a valuable contribution. The main weakness is that the quantitative backbone, especially the two-component-to-two-scale decomposition and the resulting column-density correlations, rests on rotation-diagram curvature that the paper itself acknowledges could be caused by non-LTE or opacity effects for the species driving the analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Sec. 4.2.1, Table C.1] The load-bearing assumption that the two fitted rotation-diagram components correspond to two distinct physical spatial scales (cold extended GMC-scale gas and warm compact pSSC-scale gas) is not established for CH3CHO and CH3NH2. The paper states in Sec. 4.2.1 that "the presence of two components is only clear for NH2CHO whilst it is not clear for CH3CHO and CH3NH2," and for CH3NH2 that "the deviation in the RD could be due to non-LTE effects." Despite this, both species are fitted with two components, assigned to GMC and pSSC scales in Table C.1, and those scale-separated column densities are used in Fig. 6 and in the shock discussion of Sec. 5.2. Since no non-LTE or opacity treatment is applied to CH3CHO, CH3NH2, NH2CHO, or C2H5OH, the rotation-diagram curvature is degenerate with a single-component non-LTE/opacity model. The paper's own CH2NH LVG analysis (Sec. 4.3) demonstrates that this environment produces optical depths up to 3.4 and rotational temperatures below the kinetic temperature. The two-component-to-two-scale mapping, and every quantitative quantity built on it, is therefore not uniquely constrained; this needs either a non-LTE analysis for the other species or a substantial reframing of the quantitative results as model-dependent.
  2. [Sec. 5.1, Fig. 6] The chemical correlation analysis and the quoted abundance ratios (e.g., [C2H5OH/CH3CHO] ~ 3 and [CH3NH2/NH2CHO] ~ 3) are computed from column densities whose systematic uncertainties are not propagated. The Ntot values in Table C.1 depend on the assumed source size, beam-filling factor, component assignment, and the assumed 50/50 split of blended E/A and overlapped lines. These choices are correlated across species and regions, so the Pearson coefficients and p-values in Fig. 6 overstate the statistical support for chemical links. The trends may be real, but as presented they do not provide quantitative constraints on formation pathways. The paper should propagate the systematic uncertainties or explicitly present the correlations as illustrative trends rather than measured abundance ratios.
  3. [Sec. 4.3, Sec. 5.1.3, Fig. 6] For CH2NH, the paper performs an LVG analysis that yields a column density of about 1.5-2 x 10^16 cm^-2 and a compact emission size of 0.15-0.6 arcsec, but then proceeds to use the rotation-diagram column densities of CH2NH in the discussion and in Fig. 6, rather than the LVG-based values. The paper explicitly says the population-diagram correction was only meant to evaluate non-LTE effects, but the RD values differ substantially from the LVG values (e.g., for GMC 6, the RD at pSSC scale gives 4.8 x 10^16 cm^-2 versus the LVG value of 1.5 x 10^16 cm^-2). Because the correlation between CH2NH and CH3NH2 in panels (e) and (j) of Fig. 6 is used as evidence for a chemical link or shared physical process, the choice of CH2NH column density is load-bearing. The authors should either use the LVG-based column densities for CH2NH in the correlation analysis or clearly state that those correlations are based on uncorrected LTE values.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption labels the top panels as "CH3OH" but the text in Sec. 4.2.1 and the plotted data refer to CH3CHO; this is likely a typo and should be corrected.
  2. [Figs. B.1 and B.10 captions] The phrase "we did use them in the analysis" should read "we did not use them in the analysis," since the text says these blended lines were excluded.
  3. [Table C.1, pSSC 2 CH3NH2] The warm component of CH3NH2 toward pSSC 2 has a rotational temperature of 65.8 +/- 37.8 K; this very large uncertainty should be noted in the text when this value is discussed, as it weakens the comparison with other regions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: temperatures and column densities are fitted and labelled as fits; the two-component-to-two-scale mapping is an explicitly stated assumption with conditional conclusions, not a prediction forced by construction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is an observational analysis: line intensities are measured from ALCHEMI cubes, Gaussian-fitted, and used in rotational-diagram and, for CH2NH, LVG non-LTE analyses. The resulting Trot and Ntot values are presented as fitted quantities, not as predictions from a model. The load-bearing interpretive step is the assignment of the cold low-Eu rotational-diagram component to GMC scales and the warm high-Eu component to pSSC scales. This is, however, explicitly labelled as an assumption rather than a derived or predicted result: Sec. 4.2 states 'we made the assumption that they are not arising from the same spatial component... we assumed that whilst the former mainly arises from GMC scales, the latter arises from more compact scales.' The corresponding conclusions are conditional: 'If the iCOMs emit at GMC scales, the most favourable scenario to explain the widespread emission of the iCOMs is if they are tracing large-scale shocks within the GMCs.' No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no output equation reduces to an input equation by construction, and no uniqueness or exclusion claim is imported from self-citations. The paper also states its own limitation that the two-component decomposition is insecure for some species: 'the presence of two components is only clear for NH2CHO whilst it is not clear for CH3CHO and CH3NH2,' and for CH3NH2 it allows that 'the deviation in the RD could be due to non-LTE effects.' These are honest caveats about interpretive degeneracy, not circularity. Citations to prior ALCHEMI papers and to Bouvier et al. (2024) are data and method references rather than load-bearing self-justification, and the non-LTE analysis uses external collisional rates from Xue et al. (2024). The analysis is therefore self-contained and lacks any circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's conclusions depend on standard observational assumptions (LTE, optically thin emission, Rayleigh-Jeans) that are stated in Sec. 4.1 and shown by the authors to be violated for CH2NH in Sec. 4.3, plus an a priori mapping of fitted components to GMC versus pSSC spatial scales (Sec. 4.2). The LVG analysis is a genuine fit to data. No free parameters are hidden in the sense of fitting to produce a prediction, but the assumed source sizes dominate the absolute column densities and hence the correlation analysis. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • Source size for the GMC-scale component (theta_s) = 1.6 arcsec; beam-filling factor 0.5
    Adopted in Sec. 4.1 as a first approximation for the cold component. Sets the absolute scale of all GMC-scale column densities; not fitted except for CH2NH.
  • Source size for the pSSC-scale component (theta_s) = 0.12 arcsec (~2 pc, Leroy et al. 2018)
    Used for the warm component, giving a beam-filling factor of about 0.01; switching between 1.6 and 0.12 arcsec changes column densities by about two orders of magnitude (Table C.1).
  • CH3CHO E/A symmetry-state ratio = 1
    Assumed in Sec. 4.1 because the kinetic temperature is much higher than the 0.1 K E/A splitting; directly scales CH3CHO column densities.
  • Blend split for E/A pairs and overlapping lines = 50/50 per transition
    Assumed in Sec. 4.1 for blended CH3CHO, NH2CHO, CH3NH2, and C2H5OH transitions; propagates into all derived column densities.
  • LVG fixed linewidth for CH2NH = 50 km/s
    Adopted in Sec. 4.3 as the average CH2NH linewidth across regions; an input to the LVG grid, not fitted.
  • LVG fitted column density of CH2NH = (0.2-2) x 10^16 cm^-2
    Best-fit grid result (Table 2). Listed because it is fitted to data, though it is a measurement output rather than a hidden degree of freedom.
  • LVG fitted n(H2), Tkin, source size for CH2NH = n(H2) 0.6e5-3e6 cm^-3; Tkin best fits 33-150 K, often lower limits; size 0.19-0.26 arcsec
    Best-fit grid results (Table 2). Temperatures are mostly lower limits because the collisional rates cap at 150 K.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Rotational diagram method assumes LTE and optically thin emission.
    Stated in Sec. 4.1; underpins all Trot and Ntot values. The CH2NH LVG analysis (Sec. 4.3) shows optical depths up to 3.4 and non-LTE excitation, so the assumption fails for at least one species.
  • domain assumption Rayleigh-Jeans approximation holds for the analyzed transitions.
    Invoked in Sec. 4.1 without further verification; standard at 84-373 GHz.
  • ad hoc to paper Low-Eu transitions trace GMC-scale gas and high-Eu transitions trace pSSC-scale gas when two components are fitted.
    Adopted in Sec. 4.2 to assign beam-filling factors and column-density scales; the supporting kinematic evidence (FWHM/Vpeak shifts) is clear only for NH2CHO.
  • ad hoc to paper The warm compact component contributes negligibly to the cold extended component.
    Stated as a caveat in Sec. 4.2; required for the two-component decomposition and for comparing column densities at the two scales.
  • domain assumption CH3CHO E/A ratio equals 1 and blended transitions contribute 50% each.
    Sec. 4.1; physically motivated but arbitrary at the 10-20% level; affects all CH3CHO column densities and several other species.
  • domain assumption CH2NH-H2 collisional rates (Xue et al. 2024) are accurate over 10-150 K.
    Sec. 4.3; limits Tkin to lower limits and forces exclusion of the 312.336 GHz line (Eu = 151.3 K).
  • domain assumption Column-density correlations indicate shared formation pathways or physical processes.
    Sec. 5.1 uses correlations to argue for chemical links; the authors note correlation does not always imply a chemical link, but the discussion depends on interpreting the correlations as meaningful.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Complex Organic Molecules towards the central molecular zone of NGC 253." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SELBD7ZL

@misc{pith2026250419631,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Complex Organic Molecules towards the central molecular zone of NGC 253},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SELBD7ZL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19631}
}
abstract

Interstellar complex organic molecules (iCOMs) may have a link to prebiotic species, key building blocks for life. In Galactic star-forming (SF) regions, spatial variations of iCOMs emission could reflect the source physical structure or different chemical formation pathways. Investigating iCOMs in extragalactic SF regions may thus provide crucial information about these regions. As an active extragalactic SF region, the central molecular zone (CMZ) of the nearby galaxy NGC 253 provides an ideal template for studying iCOMs under more extreme conditions. We aim to investigate the emission of a few selected iCOMs and understand if a difference between the iCOMs could reflect on the source's chemical or physical structure. Using the high angular resolution ($\sim 27$ pc) observations from the ALCHEMI ALMA large program, we imaged the emission of selected iCOMs and precursors; CH$_3$CHO, C$_2$H$_5$OH, NH$_2$CHO, CH$_2$NH, and CH$_3$NH$_2$. We estimated the iCOMs gas temperatures and column densities using a rotational diagram analysis, and by performing a non-LTE analysis for CH$_2$NH.The iCOM emission concentrates mostly towards the inner part of the CMZ of NGC 253 and can be reproduced with two gas components. Different emission processes can explain iCOM emission towards the CMZ of NGC 253: at Giant Molecular Cloud (GMC) scales ($\sim 27$ pc), the iCOMs could trace large-scale shocks whilst at smaller scales (few pc), both shock and heating processes linked with ongoing star formation may be involved. Using column density correlation trends and known formation pathways, we find that more than one formation path could be involved to explain the iCOM emission. Finally, we found chemical differences between the GMCs, such as a decrease of abundance for the N-bearing species towards one of the GMCs or different excitation conditions for NH$_2$CHO and CH$_3$CHO towards two of the GMCs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19631 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overlap of contours corresponding to the velocity integrated species emission, ordered by their upper energy level, Eu. A spatial scale of 50 pc corresponds to ∼ 3 ′′. The kinematic centre (αICRS = 00h47m33.14s and δICRS = −25◦17′17.52′′; Müller-Sánchez et al. 2010) is labelled by a filled black triangle. The black crosses mark the positions analysed in this work and correspond to GMC 7, GMC 6, pSSC 5 and pSSC 2. Fo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rotation diagrams of each species towards GMC 6. The parameters Eu, Nu, and gu are the level energy (with respect to the ground state), column density and degeneracy of the upper level, respectively. The error bars on ln(Nu/gu) include a calibration error of 15% (see Sec. 2). The blue (and orange if a second component is fitted) solid lines represent the best fits and the dashed grey lines are the extrapolations of … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Linewidths (FWHM; left-hand side) and peak velocities (Vpeak; right-hand side) as a function of upper level energies (Eu) for CH3OH (top panels), CH3NH2 (middle panels), and NH2CHO (bottom panels) and for GMC 6 (filled green circles), pSSC 5 (filled magenta pentagons) and pSSC 2 (filled orange diamonds). The vertical dashed grey lines indicate where the deviation in the RDs occurs, i.e. ∼ 40 K, 30 K, and 60 K for CH… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Derived rotational temperature (Trot; Top panel) and total column density (Ntot; bottom panel) for each species and region. The order of the regions follows the layout of the GMCs/SSCs of the CMZ from north-east to south-west as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Volume density and kinetic temperature contour plots showing the results from the LVG analysis for CH2NH towards GMC 7 (green), GMC 6 (blue), pSSC 5 (magenta) and pSSC 2 (orange). The contours show the 1σ solutions obtained for the minimum χ 2 r value in the column den…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relation between the column densities of the iCOMs derived from the rotation diagrams at GMC scales (θ = 1.6 ′′; Left-hand side of the figure) and at pSSC scales (θ = 0.12′′; Right-hand side of the figure), for each region (GMC 7: blue; GMC 6: green; pSSC 5: magenta; p…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic (not to scale) of summarising the possible formation pathways and chemical links between the iCOMs (Sec. 5.1) and their emission origins (Sec. 5.2) within a GMC. The temperatures reported are averaged over the region but there can be variation from one region…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

195 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    2020, , 897, 110

    Aikawa , Y., Furuya , K., Yamamoto , S., & Sakai , N. 2020, , 897, 110

    2020

  4. [4]

    2017, ApJ, 849, 81

    Ando, R., Nakanishi, K., Kohno, K., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 81

    2017

  5. [5]

    G., Santiago-Garc \' a , J., J rgensen , J

    Arce , H. G., Santiago-Garc \' a , J., J rgensen , J. K., Tafalla , M., & Bachiller , R. 2008, , 681, L21

    2008

  6. [6]

    O ., Hocuk , S., Caselli , P., & K \

    Arslan , \"O ., Hocuk , S., Caselli , P., & K \"u c \"u k , \.I . 2023, , 518, 2050

    2023

  7. [7]

    Baek , G., Lee , J.-E., Hirota , T., Kim , K.-T., & Kim , M. K. 2022, , 939, 84

    2022

  8. [8]

    Barger , C. J. & Garrod , R. T. 2020, , 888, 38

    2020

Show all 195 references
  1. [9]

    2015, , 453, L31

    Barone , V., Latouche , C., Skouteris , D., et al. 2015, , 453, L31

    2015

  2. [10]

    G., Holdship, J., et al

    Behrens, E., Mangum, J. G., Holdship, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 119

    2022

  3. [11]

    G., Viti , S., et al

    Behrens , E., Mangum , J. G., Viti , S., et al. 2024, , 977, 38

    2024

  4. [12]

    T., M \"u ller , H

    Belloche , A., Garrod , R. T., M \"u ller , H. S. P., et al. 2019, , 628, A10

    2019

  5. [13]

    J., Maret , S., et al

    Belloche , A., Maury , A. J., Maret , S., et al. 2020, , 635, A198

    2020

  6. [14]

    Belloche , A., M \"u ller , H. S. P., Menten , K. M., Schilke , P., & Comito , C. 2013, , 559, A47

    2013

  7. [15]

    J., Beswick, R

    Bendo, G. J., Beswick, R. J., D'Cruze, M. J., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, L80

    2015

  8. [16]

    J., Jamieson , C

    Bennett , C. J., Jamieson , C. S., Osamura , Y., & Kaiser , R. I. 2005, , 624, 1097

    2005

  9. [17]

    A., & Sridharan , T

    Beuther , H., Zhang , Q., Bergin , E. A., & Sridharan , T. K. 2009, , 137, 406

    2009

  10. [18]

    2019, , 483, 1850

    Bianchi , E., Codella , C., Ceccarelli , C., et al. 2019, , 483, 1850

    2019

  11. [19]

    2022, , 928, L3

    Bianchi , E., L \'o pez-Sepulcre , A., Ceccarelli , C., et al. 2022, , 928, L3

    2022

  12. [20]

    E., Fuchs , G

    Bisschop , S. E., Fuchs , G. W., van Dishoeck , E. F., & Linnartz , H. 2007, , 474, 1061

    2007

  13. [21]

    A., Sutton, E

    Blake, G. A., Sutton, E. C., Masson, C. R., & Phillips, T. G. 1987, ApJ, 315, 621

    1987

  14. [22]

    1996, JPhCh, 100, 3063

    Bocherel, P., Herbert, L., Rowe, B., et al. 1996, JPhCh, 100, 3063

    1996

  15. [23]

    G., Barr , A

    B gelund , E. G., Barr , A. G., Taquet , V., et al. 2019 a , , 628, A2

    2019

  16. [24]

    G., McGuire , B

    B gelund , E. G., McGuire , B. A., Hogerheijde , M. R., van Dishoeck , E. F., & Ligterink , N. F. W. 2019 b , , 624, A82

    2019

  17. [25]

    T., et al

    Bonfand , M., Belloche , A., Garrod , R. T., et al. 2019, , 628, A27

    2019

  18. [26]

    M., & Bontemps , S

    Bouscasse , L., Csengeri , T., Wyrowski , F., Menten , K. M., & Bontemps , S. 2024, , 686, A252

    2024

  19. [27]

    2024, , 689, A64

    Bouvier , M., Viti , S., Behrens , E., et al. 2024, , 689, A64

    2024

  20. [28]

    R., Baratta , G

    Brucato , J. R., Baratta , G. A., & Strazzulla , G. 2006, , 455, 395

    2006

  21. [29]

    M., Shingledecker , C

    Burkhardt , A. M., Shingledecker , C. N., Le Gal , R., et al. 2019, , 881, 32

    2019

  22. [30]

    B., Elmegreen, B

    Burton, W. B., Elmegreen, B. G., Genzel, R., et al. 1992, Saas-Fee Advanced Course 21: The Galactic Interstellar Medium

    1992

  23. [31]

    A., Belloche , A., Garrod , R

    Busch , L. A., Belloche , A., Garrod , R. T., M \"u ller , H. S. P., & Menten , K. M. 2024, , 681, A104

    2024

  24. [32]

    I., & Herbst , E

    Caselli , P., Hasegawa , T. I., & Herbst , E. 1993, , 408, 548

    1993

  25. [33]

    2017, , 850, 176

    Ceccarelli , C., Caselli , P., Fontani , F., et al. 2017, , 850, 176

    2017

  26. [34]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Ceccarelli , C., Codella , C., Balucani , N., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 379

    2023

  27. [35]

    Ceccarelli, C., Maret, S., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Castets, A., & Caux, E. 2003, A&A, 410, 587

    2003

  28. [36]

    2018, , 612, A47

    Chaabouni , H., Diana , S., Nguyen , T., & Dulieu , F. 2018, , 612, A47

    2018

  29. [37]

    Charnley , S. B. 2004, Advances in Space Research, 33, 23

    2004

  30. [38]

    B., Tielens , A

    Charnley , S. B., Tielens , A. G. G. M., & Millar , T. J. 1992, , 399, L71

    1992

  31. [39]

    Chen , Y., Rocha , W. R. M., van Dishoeck , E. F., et al. 2024, , 690, A205

    2024

  32. [40]

    L., Nazari , P., et al

    Chen , Y., van Gelder , M. L., Nazari , P., et al. 2023, , 678, A137

    2023

  33. [41]

    J., Fedoseev , G., Qasim , D., et al

    Chuang , K. J., Fedoseev , G., Qasim , D., et al. 2020, , 635, A199

    2020

  34. [42]

    J., J \"a ger , C., Krasnokutski , S

    Chuang , K. J., J \"a ger , C., Krasnokutski , S. A., Fulvio , D., & Henning , T. 2022, , 933, 107

    2022

  35. [43]

    2020, , 635, A17

    Codella , C., Ceccarelli , C., Bianchi , E., et al. 2020, , 635, A17

    2020

  36. [44]

    2017, , 605, L3

    Codella , C., Ceccarelli , C., Caselli , P., et al. 2017, , 605, L3

    2017

  37. [45]

    M., et al

    Coletta , A., Fontani , F., Rivilla , V. M., et al. 2020, , 641, A54

    2020

  38. [46]

    2015, , 582, A91

    Costagliola , F., Sakamoto , K., Muller , S., et al. 2015, , 582, A91

    2015

  39. [47]

    2019, , 632, A57

    Csengeri , T., Belloche , A., Bontemps , S., et al. 2019, , 632, A57

    2019

  40. [48]

    2011, , 535, A47

    Danger , G., Borget , F., Chomat , M., et al. 2011, , 535, A47

    2011

  41. [49]

    2019, , 627, A55

    Dartois , E., Chabot , M., Id Barkach , T., et al. 2019, , 627, A55

    2019

  42. [50]

    N., da Silva , J

    de Jesus , D. N., da Silva , J. M. B. A., Tejero , T. N., et al. 2021, , 501, 1202

    2021

  43. [51]

    2020, , 640, A75

    De Simone , M., Codella , C., Ceccarelli , C., et al. 2020, , 640, A75

    2020

  44. [52]

    2011, , 526, A59

    Dedes , C., Leurini , S., Wyrowski , F., et al. 2011, , 526, A59

    2011

  45. [53]

    2012, , 544, A19

    Dore , L., Bizzocchi , L., & Degli Esposti , C. 2012, , 544, A19

    2012

  46. [54]

    Dore, L., Bizzocchi, L., Degri Esposti , C., & Gauss, J. 2010, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 263, 44

    2010

  47. [55]

    2019, , 484, L119

    Dulieu , F., Nguyen , T., Congiu , E., Baouche , S., & Taquet , V. 2019, , 484, L119

    2019

  48. [56]

    T., Bigiel , F., et al

    Eibensteiner , C., Barnes , A. T., Bigiel , F., et al. 2022, , 659, A173

    2022

  49. [57]

    P., Schlemmer , S., Schilke , P., Stutzki , J., & M \"u ller , H

    Endres , C. P., Schlemmer , S., Schilke , P., Stutzki , J., & M \"u ller , H. S. P. 2016, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 327, 95

    2016

  50. [58]

    2021, , 655, A9

    Enrique-Romero , J., Ceccarelli , C., Rimola , A., et al. 2021, , 655, A9

    2021

  51. [59]

    2016, , 459, L6

    Enrique-Romero , J., Rimola , A., Ceccarelli , C., & Balucani , N. 2016, , 459, L6

    2016

  52. [60]

    2022, , 259, 39

    Enrique-Romero , J., Rimola , A., Ceccarelli , C., et al. 2022, , 259, 39

    2022

  53. [61]

    Faure , A., Lique , F., & Remijan , A. J. 2018, Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 9, 3199

    2018

  54. [62]

    J., van Dishoeck , E

    Fedoseev , G., Chuang , K. J., van Dishoeck , E. F., Ioppolo , S., & Linnartz , H. 2016, , 460, 4297

    2016

  55. [63]

    2022, , 924, 110

    Fedoseev , G., Qasim , D., Chuang , K.-J., et al. 2022, , 924, 110

    2022

  56. [64]

    S., et al

    Ferrero , S., Grieco , F., Ibrahim Mohamed , A. S., et al. 2022, , 516, 2586

    2022

  57. [65]

    2020, , 904, 11

    Ferrero , S., Zamirri , L., Ceccarelli , C., et al. 2020, , 904, 11

    2020

  58. [66]

    F \"o rstel , M., Bergantini , A., Maksyutenko , P., G \'o bi , S., & Kaiser , R. I. 2017, , 845, 83

    2017

  59. [67]

    2014, , 568, A65

    Fuente , A., Cernicharo , J., Caselli , P., et al. 2014, , 568, A65

    2014

  60. [68]

    2000, , 355, 499

    Garc \' a-Burillo , S., Mart \' n-Pintado , J., Fuente , A., & Neri , R. 2000, , 355, 499

    2000

  61. [69]

    T., Jin , M., Matis , K

    Garrod , R. T., Jin , M., Matis , K. A., et al. 2022, , 259, 1

    2022

  62. [70]

    T., Widicus Weaver , S

    Garrod , R. T., Widicus Weaver , S. L., & Herbst , E. 2008, , 682, 283

    2008

  63. [71]

    Goldsmith, P. F. & Langer, W. D. 1999, ApJ, 517, 209

    1999

  64. [72]

    H., S \'a nchez-Monge , \'A ., Schilke , P., et al

    Golshan , R. H., S \'a nchez-Monge , \'A ., Schilke , P., et al. 2024, , 688, A3

    2024

  65. [73]

    2020, , 895, 86

    Gorai , P., Bhat , B., Sil , M., et al. 2020, , 895, 86

    2020

  66. [74]

    C., et al

    Gorai , P., Law , C.-Y., Tan , J. C., et al. 2024, , 960, 127

    2024

  67. [75]

    2017, ApJ, 842, 124

    Gorski, M., Ott, J., Rand, R., et al. 2017, ApJ, 842, 124

    2017

  68. [76]

    D., Aalto , S., K \"o nig , S., et al

    Gorski , M. D., Aalto , S., K \"o nig , S., et al. 2023, , 670, A70

    2023

  69. [77]

    D., Ott, J., Rand, R., et al

    Gorski, M. D., Ott, J., Rand, R., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 5434

    2019

  70. [78]

    M., Martín, S., et al

    Haasler, D., Rivilla, V. M., Martín, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A158

    2022

  71. [79]

    T., Ilyushin , V

    Halfen , D. T., Ilyushin , V. V., & Ziurys , L. M. 2013, , 767, 66

    2013

  72. [80]

    2022, ApJ, 938, 80

    Harada, N., Martin, S., Mangum, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, 80

    2022

  73. [81]

    G., et al

    Harada, N., Martín, S., Mangum, J. G., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 24

    2021

  74. [82]

    S., Mart\'in, S., et al

    Harada, N., Meier, D. S., Mart\'in, S., et al. 2024, ApJS, 271, 38

    2024

  75. [83]

    A., Joshi, P

    Haupa, K. A., Joshi, P. R., & Lee, Y.-P. 2022, Journal of Chinese Chemical Society, 69, 1159

    2022

  76. [84]

    M., & Steppe , H

    Henkel , C., Jacq , T., Mauersberger , R., Menten , K. M., & Steppe , H. 1987, , 188, L1

    1987

  77. [85]

    & van Dishoeck , E

    Herbst , E. & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2009, , 47, 427

    2009

  78. [86]

    G., Viti, S., et al

    Holdship, J., Mangum, J. G., Viti, S., et al. 2022, ApJ, 931, 89

    2022

  79. [87]

    2019, , 880, 138

    Holdship , J., Viti , S., Codella , C., et al. 2019, , 880, 138

    2019

  80. [88]

    Y., Abbink , D., Viti , S., & Garc \' a-Burillo , S

    Huang , K. Y., Abbink , D., Viti , S., & Garc \' a-Burillo , S. 2024, , 688, A130

    2024

  81. [89]

    2023, A&A, 675, A151

    Huang, K.-Y., Viti, S., Holdship, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A151

    2023

  82. [90]

    K., Henkel, C., Hernández-Gómez, A., et al

    Humire, P. K., Henkel, C., Hernández-Gómez, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A33

    2022

  83. [91]

    K., Thiel, V., Henkel, C., et al

    Humire, P. K., Thiel, V., Henkel, C., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A222

    2020

  84. [92]

    2022, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transactions), 24, 23245

    Ibrahim , M., Guillemin , J.-C., Chaquin , P., Markovits , A., & Krim , L. 2022, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transactions), 24, 23245

    2022

  85. [93]

    V., Alekseev, E

    Ilyushin, V. V., Alekseev, E. A., Dyubko, S. F., & Motiyenko, R. A. 2005, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 229, 170

    2005

  86. [94]

    2014, , 567, A86

    Iodice , E., Arnaboldi , M., Rejkuba , M., et al. 2014, , 567, A86

    2014

  87. [95]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.01782

    Jimenez-Serra , I. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.01782

    2025 arXiv

  88. [96]

    & Garrod , R

    Jin , M. & Garrod , R. T. 2020, , 249, 26

    2020

  89. [97]

    A., Burton , M

    Jones , P. A., Burton , M. G., Tothill , N. F. H., & Cunningham , M. R. 2011, , 411, 2293

    2011

  90. [98]

    K., M \"u ller , H

    J rgensen , J. K., M \"u ller , H. S. P., Calcutt , H., et al. 2018, , 620, A170

    2018

  91. [99]

    K., Belloche, A., & Garrod, R

    Jørgensen, J. K., Belloche, A., & Garrod, R. T. 2020, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 58, 727–778

    2020

  92. [100]

    2013, , 763, L38

    Kahane , C., Ceccarelli , C., Faure , A., & Caux , E. 2013, , 763, L38

    2013

  93. [101]

    Kim , Y. S. & Kaiser , R. I. 2011, , 729, 68

    2011

  94. [102]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.03867

    Kishikawa , R., Harada , N., Saito , T., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.03867

    2024 arXiv

  95. [103]

    J., & Godefroid, M

    Kleiner, I., Lovas, F. J., & Godefroid, M. 1996, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 25, 4

    1996

  96. [104]

    D., Leroy, A

    Krieger, N., Bolatto, A. D., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2020a, ApJ, 897, 176

  97. [105]

    V., Gerasimov , V

    Kryvda , A. V., Gerasimov , V. G., Dyubko , S. F., Alekseev , E. A., & Motiyenko , R. A. 2009, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 254, 28

    2009

  98. [106]

    Kurtz , S., Cesaroni , R., Churchwell , E., Hofner , P., & Walmsley , C. M. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings , A. P. Boss , & S. S. Russell , 299--326

    2000

  99. [107]

    N., Kolb , F

    Lamberts , T., Markmeyer , M. N., Kolb , F. J., & K \"a stner , J. 2019, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 3, 958

    2019

  100. [108]

    2019, , 876, 63

    Lee , C.-F., Codella , C., Li , Z.-Y., & Liu , S.-Y. 2019, , 876, 63

    2019

  101. [109]

    2017, , 469, L73

    Lefloch , B., Ceccarelli , C., Codella , C., et al. 2017, , 469, L73

    2017

  102. [110]

    K., Bolatto, A

    Leroy, A. K., Bolatto, A. D., Ostriker, E. C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 25

    2015

  103. [111]

    K., Bolatto, A

    Leroy, A. K., Bolatto, A. D., Ostriker, E. C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 126

    2018

  104. [112]

    C., Bolatto, A

    Levy, R. C., Bolatto, A. D., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 912, 4

    2021

  105. [113]

    2024, , 533, 1583

    Li , C., Qin , S.-L., Liu , T., et al. 2024, , 533, 1583

    2024

  106. [114]

    2017, , 849, 115

    Li , J., Shen , Z., Wang , J., et al. 2017, , 849, 115

    2017

  107. [115]

    2020, , 492, 556

    Li , J., Wang , J., Qiao , H., et al. 2020, , 492, 556

    2020

  108. [116]

    Ligterink , N. F. W., Terwisscha van Scheltinga , J., Taquet , V., et al. 2018, , 480, 3628

    2018

  109. [117]

    2019, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 3, 2122

    L \'o pez-Sepulcre , A., Balucani , N., Ceccarelli , C., et al. 2019, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 3, 2122

    2019

  110. [118]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.00495

    L \'o pez-Sepulcre , A., Codella , C., Ceccarelli , C., Podio , L., & Robuschi , J. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.00495

    2024 arXiv

  111. [119]

    A., Mendoza , E., et al

    L \'o pez-Sepulcre , A., Jaber , A. A., Mendoza , E., et al. 2015, , 449, 2438

    2015

  112. [120]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.06397

    Lu , Y., Quan , D., Chang , Q., Chen , L.-F., & Li , D. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.06397

    2024 arXiv

  113. [121]

    G., Ginsburg, A

    Mangum, J. G., Ginsburg, A. G., Henkel, C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 170

    2019

  114. [122]

    2011, A&A, 526, A47

    Maret, S., Hily-Blant, P., Pety, J., Bardeau, S., & Reynier, E. 2011, A&A, 526, A47

    2011

  115. [123]

    2011, A&A, 527, A36

    Mart\'in, S., Krips, M., Mart\'in-Pintado, J., et al. 2011, A&A, 527, A36

    2011

  116. [124]

    2006, ApJS, 164, 450

    Mart\'in, S., Mauersberger, R., Mart\'in-Pintado, J., Henkel, C., & Garc\'ia-Burillo, S. 2006, ApJS, 164, 450

    2006

  117. [125]

    I., & Rajappan , M

    Mart \' n-Dom \'e nech , R., \"O berg , K. I., & Rajappan , M. 2020, , 894, 98

    2020

  118. [126]

    G., Harada, N., et al

    Martín, S., Mangum, J. G., Harada, N., et al. 2021, A&A, 656, A46

    2021

  119. [127]

    E., Friberg , P., & Irvine , W

    Matthews , H. E., Friberg , P., & Irvine , W. M. 1985, , 290, 609

    1985

  120. [128]

    M., Sage , L

    Mauersberger , R., Henkel , C., Walmsley , C. M., Sage , L. J., & Wiklind , T. 1991, , 247, 307

    1991

  121. [129]

    J., van Breugel , W., & Heckman , T

    McCarthy , P. J., van Breugel , W., & Heckman , T. 1987, , 93, 264

    1987

  122. [130]

    McCormick, A., Veilleux, S., & Rupke, D. S. N. 2013, ApJ, 774, 126

    2013

  123. [131]

    S., Walter, F., Bolatto, A

    Meier, D. S., Walter, F., Bolatto, A. D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 63

    2015

  124. [132]

    Mills, E. A. C., Gorski, M., Emig, K. L., et al. 2021, ApJ, 919, 105

    2021

  125. [133]

    T., Colzi , L., et al

    Mininni , C., Beltr \'a n , M. T., Colzi , L., et al. 2023, , 677, A15

    2023

  126. [134]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04040

    M \"o ller , T., Schilke , P., S \'a nchez-Monge , \'A ., & Schmiedeke , A. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04040

    2024 arXiv

  127. [135]

    2024, , 688, A150

    Molpeceres , G., Furuya , K., & Aikawa , Y. 2024, , 688, A150

    2024

  128. [136]

    J., Pel \'a ez , R

    Molpeceres , G., K \"a stner , J., Herrero , V. J., Pel \'a ez , R. J., & Mat \'e , B. 2022, , 664, A169

    2022

  129. [137]

    Molpeceres, G., Tsuge, M., Furuya, K., Watanabe, N., et al. 2024, J. Phys. Chem. A, 128, 3874-3889

    2024

  130. [138]

    M \"u ller , H. S. P., Belloche , A., Xu , L.-H., et al. 2016, , 587, A92

    2016

  131. [139]

    M\"uller, H. S. P., Schlöder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewisser, G. 2005, JMoSt, 742, 215

    2005

  132. [140]

    2011, , 535, A103

    Muller , S., Beelen , A., Gu \'e lin , M., et al. 2011, , 535, A103

    2011

  133. [141]

    M., Henkel , C., & Kanekar , N

    Muller , S., Ubachs , W., Menten , K. M., Henkel , C., & Kanekar , N. 2021, , 652, A5

    2021

  134. [142]

    A., Acosta-Pulido, J

    M\"uller-S\'anchez, F., Gonz\'alez-Mart\' i n, O., Fern\'andez-Ontiveros, J. A., Acosta-Pulido, J. A., & Prieto, M. A. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1166

    2010

  135. [143]

    D., van Gelder , M

    Nazari , P., Meijerhof , J. D., van Gelder , M. L., et al. 2022, , 668, A109

    2022

  136. [144]

    Osterbrock , D. E. 1974, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae (A Series of Books in Astronomy and Astrophysics, San Franciso: Freeman)

    1974

  137. [145]

    T., & Herbst , E

    Paulive , A., Carder , J. T., & Herbst , E. 2022, , 516, 4097

    2022

  138. [146]

    C., Brauer, C

    Pearson, J. C., Brauer, C. S., & Drouin, B. J. 2008, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 251, 394

    2008

  139. [147]

    2022, , 512, 4419

    Peng , Y., Liu , T., Qin , S.-L., et al. 2022, , 512, 4419

    2022

  140. [148]

    2022, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 6, 496

    Perrero , J., Enrique-Romero , J., Mart \' nez-Bachs , B., et al. 2022, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 6, 496

    2022

  141. [149]

    2024, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transactions), 26, 18205

    Perrero , J., Vitorino , J., Congiu , E., et al. 2024, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transactions), 26, 18205

    2024

  142. [150]

    M., Poynter, R

    Pickett, H. M., Poynter, R. L., Cohen, E. A., et al. 1998, JQSRT, 60, 883

    1998

  143. [151]

    P., Güsten, R., Harris, A., et al

    Pérez-Beaupuits, J. P., Güsten, R., Harris, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 23

    2018

  144. [152]

    2018, , 613, A3

    Qiu , J., Wang , J., Shi , Y., et al. 2018, , 613, A3

    2018

  145. [153]

    2018, , 474, 2796

    Qu \'e nard , D., Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., Viti , S., Holdship , J., & Coutens , A. 2018, , 474, 2796

    2018

  146. [154]

    2004, , 416, 165

    Raunier , S., Chiavassa , T., Duvernay , F., et al. 2004, , 416, 165

    2004

  147. [155]

    G., McCall, M

    Rekola, R., Richer, M. G., McCall, M. L., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 330

    2005

  148. [156]

    A., Martín-Pintado, J., Rodríguez-Franco, A., et al

    Requena-Torres, M. A., Martín-Pintado, J., Rodríguez-Franco, A., et al. 2006, A&A, 455, 971

    2006

  149. [157]

    Rico-Villas, F., Martin-Pintado, J., Gonzalez-Alfonso, E., Martin, S., & Rivilla, V. M. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 4573

    2020

  150. [158]

    2018, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 2, 720

    Rimola , A., Skouteris , D., Balucani , N., et al. 2018, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 2, 720

    2018

  151. [159]

    M., Garc \' a De La Concepci \'o n , J., Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., et al

    Rivilla , V. M., Garc \' a De La Concepci \'o n , J., Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., et al. 2022 a , Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 829288

    2022

  152. [160]

    M., Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., Mart \' n-Pintado , J., et al

    Rivilla , V. M., Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., Mart \' n-Pintado , J., et al. 2022 b , Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 876870

    2022

  153. [161]

    F., Rawlings , J

    Roberts , J. F., Rawlings , J. M. C., Viti , S., & Williams , D. A. 2007, , 382, 733

    2007

  154. [162]

    Rocha , W. R. M., van Dishoeck , E. F., Ressler , M. E., et al. 2024, , 683, A124

    2024

  155. [163]

    A., Goss , W

    Rodr \' guez-Rico , C. A., Goss , W. M., Zhao , J. H., G \'o mez , Y., & Anantharamaiah , K. R. 2006, , 644, 914

    2006

  156. [164]

    Rosenberg, M. J. F., Kazandjian, M. V., van der Werf, P. P., et al. 2014, A&A, 564, A126

    2014

  157. [165]

    C., Hickson , K

    Ruaud , M., Loison , J. C., Hickson , K. M., et al. 2015, , 447, 4004

    2015

  158. [166]

    2019, , 489, 594

    Rubin , M., Altwegg , K., Balsiger , H., et al. 2019, , 489, 594

    2019

  159. [167]

    2011, ApJ, 735, 19

    Sakamoto, K., Mao, R.-Q., Matsushita, S., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 19

    2011

  160. [168]

    M., Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., et al

    Sanz-Novo , M., Rivilla , V. M., Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., et al. 2024, , 965, 149

    2024

  161. [169]

    B., et al

    Sewi o, M., Indebetouw, R., Charnley, S. B., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, L19

    2018

  162. [170]

    Shimonishi, T., Tanaka, K. E. I., Zhang, Y., & Furuya, K. 2023, ApJL, 946, L41

    2023

  163. [171]

    2018, , 853, 139

    Sil , M., Gorai , P., Das , A., et al. 2018, , 853, 139

    2018

  164. [172]

    V., et al

    Sivaramakrishnan, R., Su, M.-C., Michael, J. V., et al. 2009, J. Phys. Chem., A, 114, 755

    2009

  165. [173]

    2018, , 854, 135

    Skouteris , D., Balucani , N., Ceccarelli , C., et al. 2018, , 854, 135

    2018

  166. [174]

    2017, , 468, L1

    Skouteris , D., Vazart , F., Ceccarelli , C., et al. 2017, , 468, L1

    2017

  167. [175]

    F., et al

    Suzuki , T., Majumdar , L., Goldsmith , P. F., et al. 2023, , 954, 189

    2023

  168. [176]

    2016, , 825, 79

    Suzuki , T., Ohishi , M., Hirota , T., et al. 2016, , 825, 79

    2016

  169. [177]

    2018, , 237, 3

    Suzuki , T., Ohishi , M., Saito , M., et al. 2018, , 237, 3

    2018

  170. [178]

    G., Viti, S., et al

    Tanaka, K., Mangum, J. G., Viti, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 18

    2024

  171. [179]

    2018, , 620, L6

    Tercero , B., Cuadrado , S., L \'o pez , A., et al. 2018, , 620, L6

    2018

  172. [180]

    2011, , 534, A64

    Theule , P., Borget , F., Mispelaer , F., et al. 2011, , 534, A64

    2011

  173. [181]

    E., Terzieva , R., & Herbst , E

    Turner , B. E., Terzieva , R., & Herbst , E. 1999, , 518, 699

    1999

  174. [182]

    Ulvestad, J. S. & Antonucci, R. R. J. 1997, ApJ, 488, 621

    1997

  175. [183]

    G., Scir \`e , C., Baratta , G

    Urso , R. G., Scir \`e , C., Baratta , G. A., et al. 2017, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transactions), 19, 21759

    2017

  176. [184]

    J., Kristensen, L

    van der Walt , S. J., Kristensen, L. E., J rgensen, J., et al. 2021, A&A, 655, A86

    2021

  177. [185]

    Vasyunin , A. I. & Herbst , E. 2013, , 769, 34

    2013

  178. [186]

    Vazart, F., Calderini, D., Puzzarini, C., Skouteris, D., & Barone, V. 2016, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 12, 5385

    2016

  179. [187]

    2020, , 499, 5547

    Vazart , F., Ceccarelli , C., Balucani , N., Bianchi , E., & Skouteris , D. 2020, , 499, 5547

    2020

  180. [188]

    P., Dever, J

    Viti, S., Collings, M. P., Dever, J. W., McCoustra, M. R. S., & Williams, D. A. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 1141

    2004

  181. [189]

    L., Laas, J

    Widicus Weaver, S. L., Laas, J. C., Zou, L., et al. 2017, ApJS, 232, 3

    2017

  182. [190]

    Woon , D. E. 2002, , 571, L177

    2002

  183. [191]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 967, 164

    Xue, C., Remijan, A., Faure, A., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 967, 164

    2024

  184. [192]

    2017, Introduction to Astrochemsitry: chemical Evolution from Interstellar Clouds to Star and Planet Formation (Springer)

    Yamamoto, S. 2017, Introduction to Astrochemsitry: chemical Evolution from Interstellar Clouds to Star and Planet Formation (Springer)

    2017

  185. [193]

    2021, , 910, 20

    Yang , Y.-L., Sakai , N., Zhang , Y., et al. 2021, , 910, 20

    2021

  186. [194]

    M., et al

    Zeng , S., Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., Rivilla , V. M., et al. 2018, , 478, 2962

    2018

  187. [195]

    2020, , 497, 4896

    Zeng , S., Zhang , Q., Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., et al. 2020, , 497, 4896

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.