Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 69 references

Probing the quantum speed limit and entanglement in flavor oscillations of neutrino-antineutrino system in curved spacetime

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A spinning black hole's gravity modifies neutrino-antineutrino flavor oscillations and the quantum speed limit of the flavor change.

desk verdict A load-bearing unit error in the oscillation phase and QSLT ratio guts the central quantitative claims; the KSP coordinate application is new but the advertised analytical potential is never shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.20236 v2 pith:L6KKRAUL submitted 2025-04-28 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-phhep-thquant-ph

Abhishek Kumar Jha , Mriganka Dutta , Mayank Pathak , Subhashish Banerjee , Banibrata Mukhopadhyay This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEhep-phhep-thquant-ph PACS 04.70.-s14.60.Pq03.65.-w03.67.-a
keywords neutrinooscillationsneutrino-antineutrinoKerr-Schildpolarcoordinatesfour-vectorgravitationalpotentialquantumspeedlimittimeentanglemententropyprimordialblackholesZeemaneffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the gravitational field of a spinning primordial black hole, described by the Kerr metric in Kerr-Schild polar coordinates, generates a four-vector gravitational potential that enters the Dirac equation as an axial term and changes how neutrinos oscillate into antineutrinos and into other flavors. That potential depends on the polar angle of the neutrino's position relative to the spin axis, the distance from the hole, and the dimensionless spin parameter a, and it vanishes for a non-spinning hole. If correct, the result means that near a spinning black hole the flavor survival probability, the quantum speed limit time ratio, and the entanglement entropy of the neutrino state are all altered by gravity within roughly 100 gravitational radii, after which standard vacuum oscillations return. The authors connect the same mechanism to a gravitational Zeeman splitting of neutrino and antineutrino energies and find that the resulting neutrino-number asymmetry at the Sun's surface is many orders of magnitude below current observations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the four-vector gravitational potential $B^d$ built from the spin connection, evaluated in Kerr-Schild polar coordinates. It produces an axial-vector term $B_d\gamma^d\gamma^5$ in the Dirac Lagrangian, which for Majorana neutrinos becomes an effective mass matrix that couples neutrino and antineutrino two-spinors. The computations then rest on three tools: the WKBJ approximation that the neutrino wavelength is small enough for $B^d$ to be locally constant, the ultrarelativistic approximation for the energy eigenvalues, and the null radial geodesic mapping from time to radial distance. The quantum speed limit ratio is built from the Bures angle $S_0 = \cos^{-1}\sqrt{P_S}$ and the energy variance $\Delta H$.

What would settle it

Compute the neutrino survival probability near a $10^{18}$ kg spinning primordial black hole by numerically integrating the Dirac equation in the Kerr background without assuming a locally constant $B^d$, for $a = 0.998$ and $\theta = \pi/3$. If the exact result differs materially from the paper's Eq. (32) for radii between about $3$ and $6$ gravitational radii, the WKBJ stitching assumption fails and the claimed suppression of oscillations near the hole is not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the Kerr-Schild polar coordinate form of the Kerr metric the spin connection yields a nonzero four-vector gravitational potential $B^d = \epsilon^{abcd}\omega_{bac}$, and that this potential changes the effective mass matrix of a Majorana neutrino-antineutrino system. Diagonalizing that matrix gives a mixing angle and an energy splitting $\delta \simeq B_0 - |\mathbf{B}|$ that drive gravity-induced oscillations between neutrino and antineutrino states. Using the WKBJ approximation and a null radial geodesic to convert propagation time to radial distance, the survival probability of an initial flavor state is computed; the same unitary evolution is used to obtain the quantum speed limit bound ratio $T_{\mathrm{QSLT}}/T$. The paper finds that this ratio is suppressed for larger black hole spin $a$, and similarly suppressed for lower primordial black hole mass, meaning stronger spin-curvature coupling allows the neutrino flavor state to evolve faster. The entanglement entropy of the four-qubit flavor state is suppressed in the strong-coupling region and reaches Bell-state-like maxima where the survival probability is near $1/2$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the WKBJ approximation: the neutrino wavelength is so small compared with the scale on which the gravitational potential varies that the potential can be treated as locally constant and the global solution built by stitching local plane waves; if this fails near the black hole, the derived survival probabilities and speed limits break down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Near a fast-spinning primordial black hole the neutrino-antineutrino oscillation length is short and the survival probability of the initial flavor state is high close to the horizon, so oscillations are suppressed in the strong-coupling region and recover farther out.
  • Larger black hole spin $a$ lowers the quantum speed limit ratio $T_{\mathrm{QSLT}}/T$, so the flavor state can evolve faster close to the hole; lower primordial black hole mass has the same effect.
  • Entanglement entropy of the neutrino-antineutrino flavor mode is strongly suppressed near the hole and returns to Bell-state-like maxima where the survival probability equals $1/2$, then becomes independent of angle and spin beyond about $100$ gravitational radii.
  • For extremely long distances the gravitational effect dies out and the two-flavor oscillation approaches ordinary vacuum mixing, independent of black hole spin and angle.
  • The same gravitational Zeeman effect generates a neutrino-number asymmetry; at the solar surface the paper estimates $\Delta n/n \sim 10^{-39}$, far below the observed cosmic value near $10^{-10}$, so a dedicated solar probe would be needed to see it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could test the WKBJ assumption directly by numerically solving the Dirac equation in the Kerr background without the local-constant approximation; the predictions near $r \sim 3\,r_g$, where $B^d$ varies fastest, are the most vulnerable.
  • Because the gravity-induced effects are confined to roughly $100$ gravitational radii, any realistic astrophysical probe would need neutrinos produced or detected very close to the horizon; distant detectors would see ordinary vacuum oscillations.
  • The same Kerr-Schild polar-coordinate four-vector potential could also be used to derive gravitational geometric phases or spin precession for other fermions around spinning black holes, not just neutrino flavor oscillations.
  • A future measurement of solar neutrino-number asymmetry at the predicted $10^{-39}$ level would confirm the gravitational Zeeman mechanism, while any detection near the observed $10^{-10}$ level from the Sun would rule it out as the dominant cause.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies two-flavor neutrino-antineutrino oscillations near a spinning primordial black hole modeled by the Kerr metric in Kerr-Schild polar coordinates. It derives (or claims to derive) the four-vector gravitational potential Bd from the spin connection, embeds its temporal and spatial components into a Hermitian effective mass matrix for Majorana neutrinos, and then computes survival probabilities, the quantum speed limit time ratio, and entanglement entropy as functions of radial distance. The central claims are that the gravitational potential significantly modifies the flavor transition probabilities within roughly 100 gravitational radii, that a larger black hole spin suppresses the QSLT bound ratio, and that a smaller PBH mass produces faster dynamical evolution and more oscillatory entanglement entropy. The paper is an application of an established spin-curvature coupling formalism, with the new elements being the Kerr-Schild polar-coordinate choice and the QSLT/entanglement analysis.

Significance. If the results were correct, the paper would provide a concrete quantum-information signature of gravitational coupling to neutrinos near black holes, extending earlier work on the gravitational Zeeman effect. The use of PDG data for neutrino parameters and the transparent mass-matrix setup are positive features, and the QSLT and entanglement diagnostics are interesting tools for this problem. However, the quantitative content is not reliable: the oscillation phase in Eq. (32) is dimensionally inconsistent, the printed QSLT formula in Eq. (57) has the wrong algebraic structure and units, and the central numerical claims rest on these equations. Because the main physical conclusions are drawn from figures and empirical relations generated from these inconsistent formulas, the paper in its present form does not establish its claims. The topic may be worth revisiting after a careful revision that fixes the units, provides the closed-form Bd, validates the WKBJ assumption, and recomputes all figures.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section VI, Eqs. (28)-(32), Fig. 10] The oscillation phase in Eq. (32) is dimensionally inconsistent. Section IV fixes r in units of rg = 1, so the integral in Eq. (31) is dimensionless, while delta in Eq. (29) has units of eV. For the phase delta * integral to be dimensionless in units with hbar = c = 1, the integral must be multiplied by rg expressed in eV^-1 (or delta must be converted to inverse length). For MPBH = 10^18 kg, rg is about 3.8 x 10^-3 eV^-1, so the plotted phases are too large by a factor of roughly 260. This directly affects the survival probabilities in Figs. 6 and 9-10. In particular, the mass dependence in Fig. 10 is suspect: since Bd scales as 1/rg through Eq. (16) and the coordinate time t from Eq. (31) carries a factor rg, the corrected phase becomes largely mass-independent, so the claim that lower PBH mass leads to highly oscillatory survival probability does not follow from the equations as written.
  2. [Section VIII, Eqs. (55) and (57), Figs. 11-12] The QSLT ratio formula in Eq. (57) is algebraically and dimensionally wrong. Equation (2) gives T_QSLT = S0 / Delta H, and Eq. (55) defines Delta H = sqrt(Q). The correct ratio is therefore T_QSLT/T = S0 / (sqrt(Q) * T), with T proportional to the integral in Eq. (31). Equation (57) instead places sqrt(Q) in the numerator, which is the reciprocal of the correct expression and has units of eV divided by a dimensionless integral. This error propagates into the bottom panel of Fig. 11, the panels of Fig. 12, and the empirical relations (58)-(59). The claims that larger a suppresses T_QSLT/T and that smaller PBH mass speeds up evolution are therefore not supported by the printed formulas.
  3. [Section VI, Eq. (30) and surrounding text] The WKBJ approximation is not quantitatively justified. The condition as typeset in Eq. (30) is not a well-formed dimensionless inequality, and the statement that it is satisfied 'from Figs. 1 and 2' is not a quantitative check. The entire r-dependent treatment, including the t-to-r mapping in Eq. (31) and the survival probabilities derived from locally constant Bd, requires that the fractional change of Bd over a neutrino wavelength be small, i.e., lambda |dB/dr| << |B|. The paper does not verify this along the specific trajectories used in the figures. Since Bd varies rapidly near the PBH, this is a load-bearing gap for the central quantitative claims.
  4. [Section IV, after Eq. (15)] The abstract and Section IV claim an analytical expression for the four-vector gravitational potential in Kerr-Schild polar coordinates, but no closed-form expression is ever displayed. The reader is given only the definition in Eq. (16), the tetrad choice in Eq. (15), and plots of B0 and |B|. Without the explicit algebraic form of Bd(r, theta, a), the claimed derivation cannot be independently checked, and the coordinate dependence that drives all subsequent results is not actually demonstrated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The notation for the survival probability alternates between Ps, PS, and P_S; please standardize it to a single symbol.
  2. [Eq. (30)] The WKBJ condition contains typographical errors involving p and p c; it should be rewritten as a dimensionless inequality, preferably in the form lambda |dB/dr| << |B| or with an explicit characteristic length scale.
  3. [Eq. (54)] The Bures angle expression has a missing ket bracket: |psi_e(r)> should appear inside the inner product, not |psi_e(r>.
  4. [Fig. 11] The panel labels for Delta H and T_QSLT/T are garbled in the typeset version; the axis labels should state the correct variable names and units.
  5. [Data availability] The data availability statement cites Ref. [59], which is the PDG review; it does not describe the data generated for the figures in this paper. Please state explicitly whether any numerical data or code is being released.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: neutrino parameters come from PDG, gravitational potential is derived from the Kerr metric, and the oscillation/QSLT/entanglement quantities are computed rather than fitted.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The four-vector gravitational potential Bd is obtained from the Kerr metric in Kerr-Schild polar coordinates through Eq. (16), which is an explicit computation from tetrads and spin connections. The neutrino masses and vacuum mixing parameters are taken from the PDG (Table I), not from the paper's own outputs. The effective mass matrix in Eq. (24) and its two-flavor extension in Eq. (34) follow from the Dirac Lagrangian in curved spacetime and from the standard gravitational Zeeman formalism of Refs. [21,22]; although several cited works share authors with the present paper, the present computation of Bd in KSP coordinates and the subsequent survival probabilities, QSLT ratio, and entanglement entropy are explicit analytic expressions built on those inputs, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The QSLT ratio in Eq. (57) uses the computed survival probability and energy fluctuation, not a target value fitted in advance. There is a possible dimensional inconsistency in Eqs. (31), (32), and (57) concerning the conversion between dimensionless rg units and eV units, and the WKBJ approximation in Eq. (30) is stated rather than quantitatively justified; these are correctness or validity concerns, not circularity. No step reduces by construction to its own input, and no load-bearing uniqueness claim is imported solely from a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results depend on the chosen PBH mass and on PDG neutrino parameters as inputs, plus the standard curved-spacetime Dirac formalism and the WKBJ approximation. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • PBH mass MPBH = 10^18 kg (also 10^17 and 10^16 kg in Figs 10, 12, 14)
    Chosen by hand to satisfy the rg ~ lambda_c condition for neutrinos; sets the overall scale of Bd in Eq (16).
  • Majorana mass parameters (me, mu, me_mu) = me = 0.0497666 eV, mu = 0.0500574 eV, me_mu = 0.000347999 eV
    Derived from PDG fitted neutrino mass splittings and vacuum mixing angle; used as fixed inputs in Eqs (45)-(48).
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Dirac equation in curved spacetime with spin connection
    Base formalism for coupling spin-1/2 particles to gravity, Eqs (5)-(9).
  • domain assumption Neutrinos are Majorana particles with left-handed chirality
    Necessary to write the four-component spinor in Eq (18) as neutrino and antineutrino states and to define the gravity-induced mass matrix in Eq (24).
  • domain assumption WKBJ approximation with locally constant Bd
    Assumed in Section VI around Eq (30) to justify plane-wave solutions and the mapping from time to radial distance in Eq (31). This is load-bearing: if it fails, the transition probabilities are not reliable.
  • domain assumption Ultrarelativistic limit |p| >> m
    Used in Eqs (28), (50), (52) to simplify the energy eigenvalues and oscillation probability.
  • ad hoc to paper Choice of tetrads in Eq (15) is 'without loss of generality'
    The specific tetrad choice from Ref [33] determines the components of Bd; a different tetrad could change the spin connection and hence the potential, though physical results should be tetrad-independent if handled correctly.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing the quantum speed limit and entanglement in flavor oscillations of neutrino-antineutrino system in curved spacetime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L6KKRAUL

@misc{pith2026250420236,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing the quantum speed limit and entanglement in flavor oscillations of neutrino-antineutrino system in curved spacetime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L6KKRAUL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.20236}
}
read the original abstract

We consider a spinning primordial black hole (PBH) described by the Kerr metric in Kerr-Schild polar coordinates. We derive an analytical expression for the four-vector gravitational potential in the underlying Hermitian Dirac Hamiltonian using these coordinates. This gravitational potential introduces an axial vector term in the Dirac equation in curved spacetime. We find that the magnitudes of the temporal and spatial components of the four-vector gravitational potential are significantly affected by the angle of the position vector of the spinor with respect to the spin axis of the PBH, its radial distance from the PBH, and the strength of the specific angular momentum of the PBH. These potentials modify the effective mass matrix of the neutrino-antineutrino system and significantly affect the transition probabilities during the flavor oscillation of the neutrino-antineutrino system. We then use the transition probability to investigate the quantum speed limit time bound ratio for the two-flavor oscillation of the neutrino-antineutrino system in curved spacetime. This helps us estimate how quickly the initial neutrino flavor state evolves over time under the influence of the gravitational field. Finally, we discuss quantum correlations such as entanglement entropy during the two-flavor oscillation of the neutrino-antineutrino system near a spinning PBH.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.20236 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Magnitude of the temporal gravitational potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Comparison between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: Mixing angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Survival probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: In the two-flavor scenario, the mixing angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: In the two-flavor scenario, the mixing angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: In the two-flavor scenario, the survival probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: In the two-flavor scenario, the survival probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: In the two-flavor scenario, (a) the Bures angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: In the two-flavor scenario, the ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: In the two-flavor scenario, the entanglement entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: In the two-flavor scenario, the entanglement entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chen and A

    W.-X. Chen and A. M. Beloborodov, Neutrino-Cooled Accre- tion Disks around Spinning Black Hole, Astrophys. J. 657, 383 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0607145

    arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    cos(2θe) + 2(E2 1− E2

    work page

  3. [3]

    (56) In the ultrarelativistic regime, the middle panel of Fig

    cos(2ϕ1) sin2θe)]. (56) In the ultrarelativistic regime, the middle panel of Fig. 11 il- lustrates the energy fluctuation ∆H as a function of the radial distance r for different values of a, withθ =π/4. We observe that at small radial distances r from the PBH, ∆H is high, and as we increase r, after a certain range, ∆H tends to zero for all values of a. F...

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Surman, J

    R. Surman, J. Beun, G. C. McLaughlin, S. Kane, and W. R. Hix, The role of neutrinos in r-process nucleosynthesis in su- pernovae and gamma-ray bursts, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 35, 014059 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Nucleosynthesis in accretion flows around Black Holes

    B. Mukhopadhyay and S. K. Chakrabarti, Nucleosynthesis in accretion flows around black holes, Astron. Astrophys. 353, 1029 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9912568

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    M. A. Luty, Baryogenesis via leptogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 45, 455 (1992)

    1992

  7. [7]

    A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate, J. Phys. G 48, 043001 (2021), arXiv:2007.10722 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Gherghetta and A

    T. Gherghetta and A. Shkerin, Probing a local dark matter halo with neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095009 (2023), arXiv:2305.06441 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Pontecorvo, Mesonium and anti-mesonium, Sov

    B. Pontecorvo, Mesonium and anti-mesonium, Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 429 (1957)

    1957

  2. [10]

    Pontecorvo, Inverse beta processes and nonconservation of lepton charge, Zh

    B. Pontecorvo, Inverse beta processes and nonconservation of lepton charge, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.34, 247 (1957)

    1957

  3. [11]

    S. M. Bilenky and B. Pontecorvo, Lepton Mixing and Neutrino Oscillations, Phys. Rept. 41, 225 (1978)

    1978

  4. [12]

    S. M. Bilenky, The History of neutrino oscillations, Phys. Scripta T 121, 17 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0410090

    2005 arXiv

  5. [13]

    S. M. Bilenky, Bruno pontecorvo and neutrino oscillations, Advances in High Energy Physics 2013, 873236 (2013), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1155/2013/873236

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    J. N. Bahcall, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, and C. Pena-Garay, So- lar neutrinos before and after neutrino 2004, JHEP 08, 016, arXiv:hep-ph/0406294

    2004 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Eguchi et al

    K. Eguchi et al. (KamLAND), First results from KamLAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 021802 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0212021

    2003 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Araki et al

    T. Araki et al. (KamLAND), Measurement of neutrino oscil- lation with KamLAND: Evidence of spectral distortion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 081801 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0406035

    2005 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Ashieet al

    Y . Ashieet al. (Super-Kamiokande), Evidence for an oscillatory signature in atmospheric neutrino oscillation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 101801 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0404034

    2004 arXiv

  10. [18]

    D. G. Michael et al. (MINOS), Observation of muon neutrino disappearance with the MINOS detectors and the NuMI neu- trino beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 191801 (2006), arXiv:hep- ex/0607088

    2006

  11. [19]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. (T2K), Observation of Electron Neutrino Appear- ance in a Muon Neutrino Beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 061802 (2014), arXiv:1311.4750 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. (T2K), Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Pa- rameters from Muon Neutrino Disappearance with an O ff-axis Beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 211803 (2013), arXiv:1308.0465 [hep-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Giganti, S

    C. Giganti, S. Lavignac, and M. Zito, Neutrino oscillations: The rise of the PMNS paradigm, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 98, 1 (2018), arXiv:1710.00715 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    R. N. Mohapatra and P. B. Pal, Massive Neutrinos in Physics and Astrophysics , 3rd ed. (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2004) https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/5024

    2004 doi

  15. [23]

    Mukhopadhyay, Gravity induced neutrino-antineutrino os- cillation: CPT and lepton number non-conservation under grav- ity, Class

    B. Mukhopadhyay, Gravity induced neutrino-antineutrino os- cillation: CPT and lepton number non-conservation under grav- ity, Class. Quant. Grav.24, 1433 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0702062

    2007 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Sinha and B

    M. Sinha and B. Mukhopadhyay, CPT and lepton number violation in neutrino sector: Modified mass matrix of neu- trino coupled to gravity, Phys. Rev. D 77, 025003 (2008), arXiv:0704.2593 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    V . D. Barger, J. G. Learned, S. Pakvasa, and T. J. Weiler, Neutrino decay as an explanation of atmospheric neutrino observations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2640 (1999), arXiv:astro- 18 ph/9810121

    1999

  18. [26]

    Barenboim, J

    G. Barenboim, J. Beacom, L. Borissov, and B. Kayser, Cpt vi- olation and the nature of neutrinos, Physics Letters B 537, 227 (2002)

    2002

  19. [27]

    Mohanty, B

    S. Mohanty, B. Mukhopadhyay, and A. R. Prasanna, Experi- mental tests of curvature couplings of fermions in general rela- tivity, Phys. Rev. D65, 122001 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0201172

    2002 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Singh and B

    P. Singh and B. Mukhopadhyay, Gravitationally induced neu- trino asymmetry, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 18, 779 (2003)

    2003

  21. [29]

    D. V . Ahluwalia and D. Grumiller, Dark matter: A Spin one half fermion field with mass dimension one?, Phys. Rev. D 72, 067701 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0410192

    2005 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Mukhopadhyay, Neutrino asymmetry around black holes: Neutrinos interact with gravity, Mod

    B. Mukhopadhyay, Neutrino asymmetry around black holes: Neutrinos interact with gravity, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 20, 2145 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505460

    2005 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Debnath, B

    U. Debnath, B. Mukhopadhyay, and N. Dadhich, Space-time curvature coupling of spinors in early universe: Neutrino asym- metry and a possible source of baryogenesis, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21, 399 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0510351

    2006 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Mukhopadhyay, T

    B. Mukhopadhyay, T. Ghosh, and S. K. Ganguly, Gravitational geometric phase, in 16th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Re- cent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories (2021) arXiv:2111.03277 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    A. K. Jha, M. Dutta, S. Banerjee, and B. Mukhopadhyay, Influ- ence of gravity on the quantum speed limit in neutrino oscilla- tions (2024) arXiv:2411.18558 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    A. K. Jha, B. Mukhopadhyay, M. Dutta, M. Pathak, and S. Banerjee, Gravitational Influence on the Quantum Speed Limit in Flavor Oscillations of Neutrino-Antineutrino System, in 17th Marcel Grossmann Meeting: On Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativ...

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Takahashi, Horizon-Penetrating Transonic Accretion Disks around Rotating Black Holes, Mon

    R. Takahashi, Horizon-Penetrating Transonic Accretion Disks around Rotating Black Holes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.382, 567 (2007), arXiv:0705.0048 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  28. [36]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973)

    1973

  29. [37]

    Thakuria, A

    D. Thakuria, A. Srivastav, B. Mohan, A. Kumari, and A. K. Pati, Generalised quantum speed limit for arbitrary time-continuous evolution, J. Phys. A 57, 025302 (2024), arXiv:2207.04124 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Mandelstam and I

    L. Mandelstam and I. Tamm, The uncertainty relation between energy and time in non-relativistic quantum mechanics, in Se- lected Papers , edited by B. M. Bolotovskii, V . Y . Frenkel, and R. Peierls (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,

  31. [39]

    Margolus and L

    N. Margolus and L. B. Levitin, The maximum speed of dy- namical evolution, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 120, 188 (1998), proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Physics and Consumption

    1998

  32. [40]

    Banerjee and K

    S. Banerjee and K. G. Paulson, Quantum speed of evolu- tion of neutral mesons, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 597 (2023), arXiv:2206.13938 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Aggarwal, S

    S. Aggarwal, S. Banerjee, A. Ghosh, and B. Mukhopadhyay, Non-uniform magnetic field as a booster for quantum speed limit: faster quantum information processing, New J. Phys. 24, 085001 (2022), arXiv:2112.04519 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Maleki and A

    Y . Maleki and A. Maleki, Speed limit of quantum dynamics near the event horizon of black holes, Phys. Lett. B810, 135700 (2020), arXiv:1906.10894 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Khan and J

    F. Khan and J. Dajka, Geometric speed limit of neutrino oscil- lation, Quant. Inf. Proc. 20, 193 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Bouri, A

    S. Bouri, A. K. Jha, and S. Banerjee, Probing CP Violation and Mass Hierarchy in Neutrino Oscillations in Matter through Quantum Speed Limits, (2024), arXiv:2405.13114 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    Blasone, F

    M. Blasone, F. Dell’Anno, S. D. Siena, and F. Illuminati, Entan- glement in neutrino oscillations, Europhysics Letters 85, 50002 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Blasone, F

    M. Blasone, F. Dell’Anno, S. De Siena, M. Di Mauro, and F. Il- luminati, Multipartite entangled states in particle mixing, Phys. Rev. D 77, 096002 (2008), arXiv:0711.2268 [quant-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Banerjee, A

    S. Banerjee, A. K. Alok, R. Srikanth, and B. C. Hiesmayr, A quantum information theoretic analysis of three flavor neutrino oscillations, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 487 (2015), arXiv:1508.03480 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  41. [49]

    A. K. Alok, S. Banerjee, and S. Uma Sankar, Quantum cor- relations in terms of neutrino oscillation probabilities, Nuclear Physics B 909, 65 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    A. K. Jha, S. Mukherjee, and B. A. Bambah, Tri-partite entan- glement in neutrino oscillations, Modern Physics Letters A 36, 2150056 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732321500565

    2021 doi

  43. [51]

    A. K. Jha and A. Chatla, Quantum studies of neutrinos on IBMQ processors, Eur. Phys. J. ST 231, 141 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    A. K. Jha, A. Chatla, and B. A. Bambah, Quantum simulation of oscillating neutrinos, in5th International Conference on Par- ticle Physics and Astrophysics (2020) arXiv:2010.06458 [hep- ph]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [53]

    A. K. Jha, A. Chatla, and B. A. Bambah, Neutrinos as qubits and qutrits, Eur. Phys. J. Plus139, 68 (2024), arXiv:2203.13485 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    V . A. S. V . Bittencourt, M. Blasone, S. De Siena, and C. Ma- trella, Complete complementarity relations for quantum corre- lations in neutrino oscillations, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 566 (2022), arXiv:2205.01601 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Banerjee, P

    R. Banerjee, P. Panda, R. Mohanta, and S. Patra, Analysis of neutrino oscillation parameters in the light on quantum entan- glement, (2024), arXiv:2410.05727 [hep-ph]

    2024

  48. [56]

    Dixit, J

    K. Dixit, J. Naikoo, B. Mukhopadhyay, and S. Banerjee, Quan- tum correlations in neutrino oscillations in curved spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 100, 055021 (2019), arXiv:1903.05664 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Mukhopadhyay and S

    B. Mukhopadhyay and S. K. Ganguly, Gravity-Induced Ge- ometric Phases and Entanglement in Spinors and Neutri- nos: Gravitational Zeeman E ffect, Universe 6, 160 (2020), arXiv:1802.10377 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Gühne and G

    O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Entanglement detection, Phys. Rept. 474, 1 (2009), arXiv:0811.2803 [quant-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Schwinger, Particles, Sources, And Fields, V olume 1 (Taylor and Francis, 2019)

    J. Schwinger, Particles, Sources, And Fields, V olume 1 (Taylor and Francis, 2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics , Quantum physics, quantum information and quantum compu- tation (Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    Shrimali, S

    D. Shrimali, S. Bhowmick, V . Pandey, and A. K. Pati, Capacity of entanglement for a nonlocal Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. A 106, 042419 (2022), arXiv:2207.11459 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996), arXiv:quant-ph/9511030

    1996 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Bravyi, Entanglement entropy of multipartite pure states, Phys

    S. Bravyi, Entanglement entropy of multipartite pure states, Phys. Rev. A 67, 012313 (2003)

    2003

  57. [65]

    F. Pan, D. Liu, G. Lu, and J. P. Draayer, Simple Entanglement Measure for Multipartite Pure States, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43, 1241 (2004), arXiv:quant-ph /0405133 19 [quant-ph]

    2004

  58. [66]

    Fields and S

    B. Fields and S. Sarkar, Big-Bang nucleosynthesis (2006 Parti- cle Data Group mini-review), (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0601514

    2006 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Steigman, Primordial Nucleosynthesis: The Predicted and Observed Abundances and Their Consequences, PoS NICXI, 001 (2010), arXiv:1008.4765 [astro-ph.CO]

    G. Steigman, Primordial Nucleosynthesis: The Predicted and Observed Abundances and Their Consequences, PoS NICXI, 001 (2010), arXiv:1008.4765 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Komatsu, K

    E. Komatsu, K. M. Smith, J. Dunkley, C. L. Bennett, B. Gold, G. Hinshaw, N. Jarosik, D. Larson, M. R. Nolta, L. Page, D. N. Spergel, M. Halpern, R. S. Hill, A. Kogut, M. Limon, S. S. Meyer, N. Odegard, G. S. Tucker, J. L. Weiland, E. Wollack, and E. L. Wright, Seven-year wilki...

    2011

  61. [69]

    Canetti, M

    L. Canetti, M. Drewes, and M. Shaposhnikov, Matter and An- timatter in the Universe, New J. Phys. 14, 095012 (2012), arXiv:1204.4186 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.