Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Brief overview of Candidate de Sitter Vacua

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Five explicit string compactifications are shown to produce metastable de Sitter vacua at leading order.

desk verdict Faithful proceedings summary of an important but conditional construction: the five dS vacua are genuine solutions of the stated leading-order EFT only if odd integer fluxes are allowed, a premise the paper itself flags as unresolved. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.00149 v1 pith:BFUSNRXS submitted 2025-04-30 hep-th hep-ph

classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords deSittervacuaKKLTanti-D3-braneupliftKlebanov-StrasslerthroatfluxcompactificationCalabi-YauorientifoldmodulistabilizationconifoldPFV
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims to assemble, for the first time, every ingredient of the two-decade-old KKLT program in fully explicit type IIB string compactifications. In five compactifications, drawn from a scan of over a hundred million flux choices, a supersymmetric AdS minimum is uplifted by a single anti-D3-brane in a Klebanov-Strassler throat to a metastable de Sitter minimum with all moduli stabilized, at leading order in the $\alpha'$ and $g_s$ expansions. The careful reader is meant to take away that explicit dS vacua at leading order now exist, and that the remaining question is whether neglected corrections preserve them.

What carries the argument

The construction combines three mechanisms: (1) conifold PFVs — a perturbatively flat complex-structure/dilaton locus engineered by specific flux choices, which stabilizes a conifold modulus at exponentially small values; (2) a non-perturbative superpotential with 151 (respectively 96) contributions from Euclidean D3-branes and O7-plane gaugino condensates, which stabilizes all Kähler moduli; (3) the KPV anti-D3-brane uplifting potential, whose leading-order form is $c / V_E^{4/3}$, tuned to match the AdS depth through the alignment parameter $\Xi$. The explicit data that carries the construction are the polytope vertices, flux vectors, and the resulting control parameters such as $g_s$, $W_0$, $z_{\rm cf}$, and $g_s M$.

What would settle it

Determine whether the flux vectors used in the five examples, e.g. $\vec K = (-6,-1,0,1,-3,2,0,-1)$ for Example 1, lie in the image of the integral flux lattice under the identification of $H^3(X,\mathbb{Z})$ with its dual; a single forbidden odd flux entry rules out that vacuum. A second, more guarded falsifier would be to compute the leading $\alpha'$ correction to the KPV potential for these specific throat models and check whether the corrected potential still has a local minimum at the claimed VEVs.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By scanning 240,480,253 flux choices across 416 Calabi-Yau orientifolds with small $h^{2,1}$, the author identifies five compactifications whose leading-order effective theory — Kähler potential at string tree level to all orders in $\alpha'$, flux and non-perturbative superpotentials, and a single anti-D3-brane with KPV uplift — has a metastable de Sitter critical point with all moduli stabilized. The paper calls these 'de Sitter vacua at leading order' and notes this is the first explicit construction of such vacua. Each example hosts a Klebanov-Strassler throat with a controlled small conifold modulus, and the uplifted minimum has positive vacuum energy with all moduli masses above the Hubble scale.

Load-bearing premise

The vacua exist only if odd integer flux vectors are allowed by flux quantization in Calabi-Yau orientifolds, and only if the neglected $\alpha'$ and $g_s$ corrections to the anti-D3-brane potential do not destabilize the minimum.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If these vacua survive higher corrections, they demonstrate that the KKLT uplift can be realized in explicit, controlled flux compactifications rather than merely in toy examples.
  • Each example provides a concrete testing ground for computing the corrections that remain unknown: warped metrics, string-loop corrections to the Kähler potential, and $\alpha'$ corrections to the anti-D3-brane potential.
  • The established scan methodology can be extended to polytopes with larger $Q_O$, which the author expects to be even richer hunting grounds for dS vacua.
  • The 30 dS minima at fixed flux choices show that a single flux configuration can yield many dS vacua within the extended Kähler cone.
  • The mass spectra, with lightest moduli masses of order $10^1 H_{\rm dS}$, indicate that these vacua are at least metastable within the leading-order theory, with decay channels beyond the reach of the computed potential.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the scan performs a controlled count of how rare such leading-order dS vacua are: 5 compactifications out of 416 selected orientifolds, and 30 vacua out of 33,371 anti-D3-brane PFVs, so a quantitative statement about the dS landscape could be extracted from the full dataset.
  • Inference: the dependence on odd flux integers is the sharpest place to attack the construction: if flux quantization in integral cohomology forbids odd entries in the chosen flux vectors, all five examples fail, so the authors' explicit caveat is the natural locus for a decisive check.
  • Inference: one could test sensitivity to the undetermined Pfaffian numbers more aggressively by randomizing $A_D$ over their expected ranges; the author only confirms stability for $n_D$ in $[10^{-3}, 10^4]$, which is a limited slice.
  • Inference: the same computational pipeline could be repurposed to look for dS vacua with two anti-D3-branes (modifying the $M/p$ bound) or with different conifold classes, thereby probing whether the five examples are part of a broader pattern.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This proceedings contribution reviews five candidate type IIB Calabi-Yau orientifold compactifications that realize KKLT-type de Sitter vacua at leading order in the alpha' and g_s expansions. The construction combines a flux superpotential from quantized three-form fluxes, a non-perturbative superpotential from Euclidean D3-branes and D7 gaugino condensation, an alpha'-corrected tree-level Kaehler potential, and an anti-D3-brane at the tip of a Klebanov-Strassler throat. The paper lists explicit polytope data, flux vectors, and control parameters for each example, reports tachyon-free mass spectra, shows convergence checks, and makes validation data publicly available. It also explicitly states that unresolved flux quantization, the assumed Pfaffian normalization, and neglected higher-order corrections leave these as candidate de Sitter vacua rather than definitive string-theory solutions.

Significance. If the existence of these vacua is confirmed within the stated effective field theory, this would be a substantial step in explicit KKLT constructions: the paper provides concrete polytope data, explicit flux vectors, a large computational scan (240 million flux configurations, 33,371 anti-D3-brane PFVs, 30 dS minima), and tachyon-free numerical solutions with convergence checks. The advertised 'first instance' claim is, however, contingent on the permissibility of odd integer flux quanta, on the assumed Pfaffian normalization, and on the control of sub-leading alpha' corrections to the anti-D3-brane potential. The manuscript is mostly honest about these conditions, and the public data and notebooks are a clear strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [§1 and §5; §4.1 Eqs. (53)-(54); §4.2 Eqs. (65)-(66)] The central claim of first explicit KKLT-type de Sitter vacua rests on the admissibility of the flux vectors K = (-6,-1,0,1,-3,2,0,-1) and K = (-5,-1,0,1,-1), which contain odd entries. The paper itself concedes in Section 5 that 'there remains ambiguity regarding whether flux quantisation conditions in Calabi-Yau orientifolds allow for odd integer fluxes.' If these odd fluxes are disallowed, Gauss's law in Eq. (28) and the complex-structure stabilization of Section 3.2 fail for all five examples in Table 1, and the vacua are not solutions even within the leading-order EFT. Because this unresolved input is load-bearing, the statement in Section 1 that 'This marks the first instance in which such vacua have been explicitly constructed' should be qualified as conditional on the odd-flux assumption unless the quantization condition is settled.
  2. [§2.3 versus Table 1] Section 2.3 states that the authors 'require M > 12 and g_s M ≳ 1', citing control of alpha' corrections to the KPV analysis. However, four of the five examples in Table 1 have g_s M below one: Example 2 has 0.913, Example 3 has 0.796, Example 4 has 0.808, and Example 5 has 0.746; only Example 1 (1.051) satisfies the stated criterion. In particular, the detailed Example 4 in Section 4.2 has g_s M = 0.808, so the expansion parameter 1/(g_s M) for alpha' corrections to the anti-D3-brane potential is not small. The paper should either explain why these examples remain within the controlled regime or restrict the claim of metastable de Sitter vacua to examples satisfying its own stated criterion.
  3. [§2.2, Eq. (30)] The non-perturbative superpotential in Eq. (31) depends on undetermined Pfaffian prefactors, normalized as in Eq. (30) with n_D = 1. The robustness scan quoted in Section 2.2 ('we verified that the de Sitter vacua exist through the full range 10^-3 ≤ n_D ≤ 10^4') is useful, but the text does not specify whether all Pfaffians are varied independently or only a common overall scale is scanned. Since Kaehler moduli stabilization with the many non-perturbative terms described in Section 4.1 is a delicate competition, the assertion that ignorance of the Pfaffian values 'does not constitute a significant weakness' requires a per-divisor robustness analysis or a physical argument for a common normalization.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1] The sentence 'The cone dual toKX is The Mori cone MX...' appears to contain a duplicated and broken phrase; it should be rewritten for clarity.
  2. [§3.3] The phrase 'aAdS precursor' should read 'an AdS precursor'.
  3. [§4.1 and Figure 5 caption] The caption uses 'potent rays', which seems to be a typo for 'sample rays' or 'points'; also 'There exist152 pure rigid prime toric divisors' is missing a space and should read 'There exist 152 ...'.
  4. [Figure 8 caption] The caption 'T wenty-two de Sitter vacua' contains an unwanted space in 'Twenty-two'.
  5. [§1 and §5] The wording in Section 1 ('first instance in which such vacua have been explicitly constructed') is stronger than the conclusion in Section 5 ('stop short of establishing a definitive proof'); the abstract and introduction should be harmonized to avoid an overclaim, for example by consistently using 'candidate de Sitter vacua at leading order'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dS vacua are obtained by solving the stated leading-order EFT equations, and self-citations to [1] are supported by public data and notebooks.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain constructs candidate de Sitter vacua by minimizing the explicit potential V = V_F + V_D3, where V_F is fixed by the Kähler potential (6), superpotential (31), and flux data, and V_D3 is the KPV/KKLT uplift term (33). The examples in Section 4 are found by numerical solution of the F-term and minimization equations, not by fitting the desired dS value; the vacuum energies in Table 1 are outputs of the computation. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: the only undetermined parameter, the Pfaffian normalization n_D, is set to n_D = 1, and the paper explicitly states that the dS vacua persist over the range 10^{-3} <= n_D <= 10^4, so the result is not forced by that choice. The selection criterion (50) is a physical alignment requirement for a viable uplift, not an input that by construction produces positive energy. The acknowledged ambiguity about odd integer fluxes is a correctness risk about whether the chosen flux vectors are quantized, and the paper honestly states in Section 5 that 'there remains ambiguity regarding whether flux quantisation conditions in Calabi-Yau orientifolds allow for odd integer fluxes.' This is a limitation of existence, not an identity between input and output. The self-citations to [1] are to the original paper on which this proceedings contribution is based, and they concern algorithmic details, convergence tests, and the constant zeta in (50); the present paper also states that data and demo notebooks are publicly available on GitHub, so the cited results are independently checkable. There is no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors, no ansatz smuggled in by self-citation, and no renaming of a known result. The central claim is therefore not circular, even though its physical validity depends on unproven flux-quantization and correction assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the truncated effective field theory, the permissibility of the chosen flux quanta, and the known but uncontrolled size of neglected corrections. No new particles or forces are introduced. The free parameters are the Pfaffian normalization n_D, which is robustly scanned, and an alignment constant zeta taken from the companion paper.

free parameters (2)
  • n_D (Pfaffian normalization) = 1, robustness checked over 10^-3 to 10^4
    The Pfaffian prefactors in the non-perturbative superpotential, Eq. (29) with normalization Eq. (30), are not computable with current methods. The paper sets n_D = 1 for all rigid divisors and verifies the de Sitter vacua persist over a wide range, so the existence claim is not tuned to a single value.
  • zeta = approximately 114 (from [1])
    Introduced in Eq. (50) to define the well-aligned condition Xi ~ 1. The derivation is not reproduced in this proceedings paper, so it functions as an input constant from the companion work.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The leading-order EFT defined by the Kahler potential in Eq. (6), the superpotential in Eq. (31), and the uplift potential in Eq. (33) is a valid approximation to the full string theory vacuum conditions.
    The entire construction is carried out in this truncated EFT; higher-order alpha-prime and g_s corrections are not included and may be significant.
  • domain assumption Flux quantization permits the odd integer flux entries used in the examples.
    The K vectors contain odd integers, for example in Section 4.1. The paper itself notes in Section 5 that this is ambiguous.
  • domain assumption The non-perturbative superpotential receives contributions only from pure rigid prime toric divisors with Pfaffian normalization as in Eq. (30) and n_D = 1.
    This restricts the sum in Eq. (29). The restriction was validated a posteriori in [1], but Pfaffians are not directly computed.
  • domain assumption The anti-D3-brane potential is given by the KPV leading-order expression in Eq. (33), with p = 1 and the metastability bound M/p > 12.
    Higher-order alpha-prime corrections to the uplift potential are neglected, and the paper requires g_s M to be order one in practice.
  • standard math Mirror symmetry and the conifold-expanded prepotential in Eq. (24) correctly describe the complex structure moduli space in the large-complex-structure and conifold regimes.
    These are standard tools in the field and are assumed valid for the specific polytopes used.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Brief overview of Candidate de Sitter Vacua." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BFUSNRXS

@misc{pith2026250500149,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Brief overview of Candidate de Sitter Vacua},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BFUSNRXS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.00149}
}
abstract

We review compactifications of type IIB string theory which produce de Sitter vacua to leading order in the $\alpha^\prime$ and $g_s$ expansions in line with the scenario proposed by Kachru, Kallosh, Linde, and Trivedi. We detail specific Calabi-Yau orientifold compactifications incorporating the non-perturbative superpotential from Euclidean D3-branes, the full flux-induced superpotential, and the K\"ahler potential evaluated at string tree level but retaining all orders in $\alpha'$. Each model hosts a Klebanov-Strassler throat featuring a single anti-D3-brane. The energy associated with this supersymmetry-breaking source, computed at leading order in $\alpha'$, lifts the minimum to a metastable de Sitter vacuum with all moduli stabilised. A key open challenge is the identification of vacua that remain stable when including additional corrections; an endeavour for which this study provides a solid foundation. This work is a contribution to the proceedings of the Corfu Summer Institute 2024 "School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity" (CORFU2024) and is based on arXiv:2406.13751.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.00149 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top: Schematic illustration of a supersymmetric AdS vacuum and the possible outcomes of the anti-D3-brane uplift in the KKLT scenario. Bottom: Scalar potentials corresponding to the AdS vacuum (black) and the uplifted dS vacuum (blue) in the flux compactification on the Calabi-Yau orientifold described in §4.2. The lower panel presents results from a fully explicit computation within the leading-order EFT defined in… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. 𝑊0 as a function of the conifold modulus 𝑧cf for the 33,371 anti-D3-brane PFVs. In the upper plot, the red lines indicate the alignment bounds 0.1 ≤ Ξ ≤ 10 as defined below in Eq. (50). In the lower panel, we zoom in on the remaining 396 points satisfying 0.1 ≤ Ξ ≤ 10 together with 𝑔𝑠 < 0.4 and 𝑊0 < 0.1. 3.3 Kähler moduli stabilisation and uplift Thus far, we found a supersymmetric minimum for the complex structure … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Kähler moduli potential before and after uplift for Example 1 in §4.1. These flux vectors satisfy −𝑀® · 𝐾® = 162 which implies that the presence of a single anti-D3-brane is required to satisfy Gauss’s law (28). The PFV locus can be found from the leading terms in the effective superpotential (46) which are here given by 𝑊PFV = 1 √ 8𝜋 5  14 e2𝜋𝑖 𝜏· 1 40 − 80 e2𝜋𝑖 𝜏· 2 40 + 118 e2𝜋𝑖 𝜏· 3 40 + . . . . (55) Numerical… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plot of the moduli masses in the de Sitter vacuum discussed in §4.1. and the complex structure parameters 𝑔𝑠 = 0.0657 , 𝑊0 = 0.0115 , 𝑧cf = 2.822 × 10−8 , 𝑔𝑠𝑀 = 1.051 . (59) The 𝛼 ′ -corrected string-frame and Einstein-frame volumes are given by V = V(0) + 𝛿V𝛼′3 + 𝛿VWS…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Convergence checks for Example 1 in §4.1. Left: The various superpotential terms (46) converge for the bulk complex structure moduli 𝑧 𝛼 in the dS minimum Right: Worldsheet instanton contributions from a random sample of 2,643 potent rays spanning a 144-dimensional sub…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Kähler moduli potential before and after uplift for Example 4 in §4.2. the corrected Einstein frame volume in the minimum V𝐸 = 1.310 × 104 . (68) Including the anti-D3-brane, we find a de Sitter vacuum with vacuum energy 𝑉dS = +2.341 × 10−15 𝑀4 pl . (69) The parameters…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plot of the moduli masses in the de Sitter vacuum discussed in §4.2. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 E / 10 3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 VdS × 10 15 Example 4: Twenty-two de Sitter vacua [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: For the same choice of flux quanta (65), we found 21 additional de Sitter vacua (blue dots) in the extended Kähler cone. The de Sitter solution discussed in the main text corresponds to the red dot. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. de Sitter JT gravity from double-scaled SYK

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The upper edge of the DSSYK spectrum, in a triple scaling limit, exactly reproduces the matrix model of two-dimensional de Sitter JT gravity.

  2. 4D de Sitter from 6D gauged supergravity with Green-Schwarz counterterm

    hep-th 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    6D gauged supergravity with the Green-Schwarz counterterm admits exact dS4×S2 and Mink4×S2 solutions (with a monopole); the de Sitter vacuum has two tachyons and flows to Minkowski.

  3. Simple quintessence models in light of DESI-BAO observations

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Thawing quintessence with linear or quadratic potentials is favored over LambdaCDM only when the DESY5 supernova catalog is used; with Pantheon+ or Union3 the preference is mild.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    McAllister, J

    L. McAllister, J. Moritz, R. Nally and A. Schachner,Candidate de Sitter vacua,Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 086015 [2406.13751]

  2. [2]

    Candelas, G.T

    P. Candelas, G.T. Horowitz, A. Strominger and E. Witten,Vacuum configurations for superstrings,Nucl. Phys. B258 (1985) 46

  3. [3]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde and S.P. Trivedi,De Sitter vacua in string theory,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 046005 [hep-th/0301240]

  4. [4]

    Demirtas, M

    M. Demirtas, M. Kim, L. Mcallister and J. Moritz,Vacua with Small Flux Superpotential, Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 211603 [1912.10047]

  5. [5]

    Sagnotti,Open Strings and their Symmetry Groups, inNATO Advanced Summer Institute on Nonperturbative Quantum Field Theory (Cargese Summer Institute), 9, 1987 [hep-th/0208020]

    A. Sagnotti,Open Strings and their Symmetry Groups, inNATO Advanced Summer Institute on Nonperturbative Quantum Field Theory (Cargese Summer Institute), 9, 1987 [hep-th/0208020]

  6. [6]

    Bianchi and A

    M. Bianchi and A. Sagnotti,On the systematics of open string theories, Phys. Lett. B247 (1990) 517

  7. [7]

    Dabholkar and J

    A. Dabholkar and J. Park,Strings on orientifolds,Nucl. Phys. B477 (1996) 701 [hep-th/9604178]

  8. [8]

    Sen,F theory and orientifolds, Nucl

    A. Sen,F theory and orientifolds, Nucl. Phys. B475 (1996) 562 [hep-th/9605150]

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Dabholkar,Lectures on orientifolds and duality, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp

    A. Dabholkar,Lectures on orientifolds and duality, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 128–191, 6, 1997 [hep-th/9804208]

  2. [10]

    Acharya, M

    B.S. Acharya, M. Aganagic, K. Hori and C. Vafa,Orientifolds, mirror symmetry and superpotentials, hep-th/0202208

  3. [11]

    Brunner and K

    I. Brunner and K. Hori,Orientifolds and mirror symmetry, JHEP11(2004) 005 [hep-th/0303135]

  4. [12]

    Brunner, K

    I. Brunner, K. Hori, K. Hosomichi and J. Walcher,Orientifolds of Gepner models,JHEP 02 (2007) 001 [hep-th/0401137]

  5. [13]

    Grimm and J

    T.W. Grimm and J. Louis,The Effective action of N = 1 Calabi-Yau orientifolds,Nucl. Phys. B 699 (2004) 387 [hep-th/0403067]

  6. [14]

    Kachru, J

    S. Kachru, J. Pearson and H.L. Verlinde,Brane / flux annihilation and the string dual of a nonsupersymmetric field theory,JHEP06 (2002) 021 [hep-th/0112197]

  7. [15]

    Grisaru, A.E.M

    M.T. Grisaru, A.E.M. van de Ven and D. Zanon,Four Loop Divergences for the N=1 Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Model in Two-Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B277 (1986) 409

  8. [16]

    Gross and E

    D.J. Gross and E. Witten,Superstring Modifications of Einstein’s Equations, Nucl. Phys. B 277 (1986) 1

  9. [17]

    Antoniadis, S

    I. Antoniadis, S. Ferrara, R. Minasian and K.S. Narain,R**4 couplings in M and type II theories on Calabi-Yau spaces, Nucl. Phys. B507 (1997) 571 [hep-th/9707013]

  10. [18]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Becker, M. Haack and J. Louis,Supersymmetry breaking and alpha-prime corrections to flux induced potentials,JHEP06 (2002) 060 [hep-th/0204254]

  11. [19]

    M. Dine, N. Seiberg, X.G. Wen and E. Witten,Nonperturbative Effects on the String World Sheet,Nucl. Phys. B278 (1986) 769

  12. [20]

    M. Dine, N. Seiberg, X.G. Wen and E. Witten,Nonperturbative Effects on the String World Sheet. 2.,Nucl. Phys. B289 (1987) 319. 23 Brief overview of Candidate de Sitter Vacua Andreas Schachner

  13. [21]

    Grimm,Non-Perturbative Corrections and Modularity in N=1 Type IIB Compactifications, JHEP10(2007) 004 [0705.3253]

    T.W. Grimm,Non-Perturbative Corrections and Modularity in N=1 Type IIB Compactifications, JHEP10(2007) 004 [0705.3253]

  14. [22]

    Gopakumar and C

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa,M theory and topological strings. 1., hep-th/9809187

  15. [23]

    Gopakumar and C

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa,M theory and topological strings. 2., hep-th/9812127

  16. [24]

    Cecotti, S

    S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara and L. Girardello,Geometry of Type II Superstrings and the Moduli of Superconformal Field Theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4 (1989) 2475

  17. [25]

    Robles-Llana, M

    D. Robles-Llana, M. Rocek, F. Saueressig, U. Theis and S. Vandoren,Nonperturbative corrections to 4D string theory effective actions from SL(2,Z) duality and supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.98 (2007) 211602 [hep-th/0612027]

  18. [26]

    Saueressig, U.Theis andS

    D.Robles-Llana, F. Saueressig, U.Theis andS. Vandoren,Membraneinstantons frommirror symmetry, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.1 (2007) 681 [0707.0838]

  19. [27]

    Baume, F

    F. Baume, F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner,Instanton Corrections and Emergent Strings, JHEP04 (2020) 174 [1912.02218]

  20. [28]

    Marchesano and M

    F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner,Instantons and infinite distances,JHEP08 (2019) 088 [1904.04848]

  21. [29]

    Hosono, A

    S. Hosono, A. Klemm and S. Theisen,Lectures on mirror symmetry, Lect. Notes Phys.436 (1994) 235 [hep-th/9403096]

  22. [30]

    Demirtas, M

    M. Demirtas, M. Kim, L. McAllister and J. Moritz,Conifold Vacua with Small Flux Superpotential, Fortsch. Phys.68(2020) 2000085 [2009.03312]

  23. [31]

    S.Gukov,C.VafaandE.Witten, CFT’sfromCalabi-Yaufourfolds ,Nucl.Phys.B 584(2000) 69 [hep-th/9906070]

  24. [32]

    Giddings, S

    S.B. Giddings, S. Kachru and J. Polchinski,Hierarchies from fluxes in string compactifications,Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 106006 [hep-th/0105097]

  25. [33]

    Witten,Nonperturbative superpotentials in string theory,Nucl

    E. Witten,Nonperturbative superpotentials in string theory,Nucl. Phys. B474 (1996) 343 [hep-th/9604030]

  26. [34]

    Blumenhagen, M

    R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetic, S. Kachru and T. Weigand,D-Brane Instantons in Type II Orientifolds, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.59(2009) 269 [0902.3251]

  27. [35]

    Schachner,On Vacuum Structures and Quantum Corrections in String Theory, Ph.D

    A. Schachner,On Vacuum Structures and Quantum Corrections in String Theory, Ph.D. thesis,CambridgeU.,UniversityofCambridge,CambridgeU.,2022. 10.17863/CAM.89738

  28. [36]

    Demirtas, M

    M. Demirtas, M. Kim, L. McAllister, J. Moritz and A. Rios-Tascon,Small cosmological constants in string theory,JHEP 12(2021) 136 [2107.09064]

  29. [37]

    Jefferson and M

    P. Jefferson and M. Kim,On the intermediate Jacobian of M5-branes, JHEP05(2024) 180 [2211.00210]

  30. [38]

    Ganor,A Note on zeros of superpotentials in F theory, Nucl

    O.J. Ganor,A Note on zeros of superpotentials in F theory, Nucl. Phys. B499 (1997) 55 [hep-th/9612077]

  31. [39]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and B. Kors,Loop corrections to volume moduli and inflation in string theory,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 026005 [hep-th/0404087]

  32. [40]

    Giddings and A

    S.B. Giddings and A. Maharana,Dynamics of warped compactifications and the shape of the warped landscape,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 126003 [hep-th/0507158]

  33. [41]

    G. Shiu, G. Torroba, B. Underwood and M.R. Douglas,Dynamics of Warped Flux Compactifications, JHEP06(2008) 024 [0803.3068]. 24 Brief overview of Candidate de Sitter Vacua Andreas Schachner

  34. [42]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Dymarsky, I.R. Klebanov, J.M. Maldacena, L.P. McAllister and A. Murugan,On D3-brane Potentials in Compactifications with Fluxes and Wrapped D-branes, JHEP11(2006) 031 [hep-th/0607050]

  35. [43]

    Frey and J

    A.R. Frey and J. Roberts,The Dimensional Reduction and Kähler Metric of Forms In Flux and Warping, JHEP10(2013) 021 [1308.0323]

  36. [44]

    Martucci,Warped Kähler potentials and fluxes,JHEP 01(2017) 056 [1610.02403]

    L. Martucci,Warped Kähler potentials and fluxes,JHEP 01(2017) 056 [1610.02403]

  37. [45]

    Crinò, F

    C. Crinò, F. Quevedo, A. Schachner and R. Valandro,A database of Calabi-Yau orientifolds and the size of D3-tadpoles,JHEP 08(2022) 050 [2204.13115]

  38. [46]

    Kim,D-instanton superpotential in string theory,JHEP03 (2022) 054 [2201.04634]

    M. Kim,D-instanton superpotential in string theory,JHEP03 (2022) 054 [2201.04634]

  39. [47]

    Alexandrov, A.H

    S. Alexandrov, A.H. Fırat, M. Kim, A. Sen and B. Stefański,D-instanton induced superpotential, JHEP07(2022) 090 [2204.02981]

  40. [48]

    Kim,On D3-brane Superpotential, 2207.01440

    M. Kim,On D3-brane Superpotential, 2207.01440

  41. [49]

    Kim,D-instanton, threshold corrections, and topological string, JHEP05(2023) 097 [2301.03602]

    M. Kim,D-instanton, threshold corrections, and topological string, JHEP05(2023) 097 [2301.03602]

  42. [50]

    Klebanov and M.J

    I.R. Klebanov and M.J. Strassler,Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and chi SB resolution of naked singularities, JHEP08(2000) 052 [hep-th/0007191]

  43. [51]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, J.M. Maldacena, L.P. McAllister and S.P. Trivedi, Towards inflation in string theory, JCAP10 (2003) 013 [hep-th/0308055]

  44. [52]

    Junghans,LVS de Sitter vacua are probably in the swampland,Nucl

    D. Junghans,LVS de Sitter vacua are probably in the swampland,Nucl. Phys. B990 (2023) 116179 [2201.03572]

  45. [53]

    Junghans,Topological constraints in the LARGE-volume scenario,JHEP08 (2022) 226 [2205.02856]

    D. Junghans,Topological constraints in the LARGE-volume scenario,JHEP08 (2022) 226 [2205.02856]

  46. [54]

    Hebecker, S

    A. Hebecker, S. Schreyer and V. Venken,Curvature corrections to KPV: do we need deep throats?, JHEP10(2022) 166 [2208.02826]

  47. [55]

    Schreyer and V

    S. Schreyer and V. Venken,𝛼’ corrections to KPV: an uplifting story, JHEP07(2023) 235 [2212.07437]

  48. [56]

    Schreyer,Higher order corrections to KPV: The nonabelian brane stack perspective, JHEP07 (2024) 075 [2402.13311]

    S. Schreyer,Higher order corrections to KPV: The nonabelian brane stack perspective, JHEP07 (2024) 075 [2402.13311]

  49. [57]

    Kreuzer and H

    M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke,Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four-dimensions, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4 (2000) 1209 [hep-th/0002240]

  50. [58]

    Demirtas, C

    M. Demirtas, C. Long, L. McAllister and M. Stillman,The Kreuzer-Skarke Axiverse,JHEP 04(2020) 138 [1808.01282]

  51. [59]

    Moritz,Orientifolding Kreuzer-Skarke, 2305.06363

    J. Moritz,Orientifolding Kreuzer-Skarke, 2305.06363

  52. [60]

    Álvarez-García, R

    R. Álvarez-García, R. Blumenhagen, M. Brinkmann and L. Schlechter,Small Flux Superpotentials for Type IIB Flux Vacua Close to a Conifold,Fortsch. Phys.68(2020) 2000088 [2009.03325]

  53. [61]

    Dubey, S

    A. Dubey, S. Krippendorf and A. Schachner,JAXVacua — a framework for sampling string vacua, JHEP12(2023) 146 [2306.06160]

  54. [62]

    Ebelt, S

    J. Ebelt, S. Krippendorf and A. Schachner,W0_sample = np.random.normal(0,1)?, Phys. Lett. B855 (2024) 138786 [2307.15749]. 25 Brief overview of Candidate de Sitter Vacua Andreas Schachner

  55. [63]

    Krippendorf and A

    S. Krippendorf and A. Schachner,New non-supersymmetric flux vacua in string theory, JHEP12 (2023) 145 [2308.15525]

  56. [64]

    Chauhan, M

    A. Chauhan, M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, A. Maharana, P. Piantadosi and A. Schachner,Deep observations of the Type IIB flux landscape, 2501.03984

  57. [65]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and B. Kors,String loop corrections to Kahler potentials in orientifolds, JHEP11 (2005) 030 [hep-th/0508043]

  58. [66]

    Kim,On string one-loop correction to the Einstein-Hilbert term and its implications on the Kähler potential, JHEP07(2023) 044 [2302.12117]

    M. Kim,On string one-loop correction to the Einstein-Hilbert term and its implications on the Kähler potential, JHEP07(2023) 044 [2302.12117]

  59. [67]

    Kim,On one-loop corrected dilaton action in string theory, Adv

    M. Kim,On one-loop corrected dilaton action in string theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27 (2023) 1965 [2305.08263]

  60. [68]

    Cho and M

    M. Cho and M. Kim,A worldsheet description of flux compactifications, JHEP05(2024) 247 [2311.04959]. 26

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.