Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 65 references

Characterizing Ocean Flows with the Scattering Transform

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the scattering transform, a wavelet-based method, can separate ocean flows—balanced currents, internal waves, and turbulence types—even when their power spectra are identical.

desk verdict Useful new application of the scattering transform to ocean flows, with the strongest claim (identical spectra) fully checked only for the 2D-vs-SQG case. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.00819 v1 pith:QRUMC4K2 submitted 2025-05-01 physics.ao-ph physics.flu-dyn

J. W. Skinner , A. Lawrence , J. Callies This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ao-phphysics.flu-dyn
keywords scatteringtransformseasurfaceheightinternalwavesbalanceddynamicsgeostrophicturbulencesubmesoscalesatellitealtimetrypowerspectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the scattering transform (ST), a wavelet-based method that records the shape and arrangement of structures, can characterize upper-ocean flows beyond what the power spectrum provides. The ST converts a spatial field into coefficients that quantify how sparse and how elongated its features are at each scale. In idealized simulations the authors show that two turbulence types with the same $k^{-5/3}$ spectra—2D turbulence and surface quasi-geostrophic turbulence—are separable by these statistics, and that balanced flow and inertia-gravity waves separate as well. Applied to sea surface height from a realistic North Atlantic simulation, the ST separates a wave-dominated eastern region from a turbulence-dominated western region and tracks the seasonal transition between regimes. If this holds for satellite snapshots, it would let altimetry missions like SWOT identify underlying ocean dynamics without the temporal filtering that current approaches require.

What carries the argument

The central object is the scattering transform: convolve the field with a family of rotated and dilated Morlet wavelets (plane waves modulated by Gaussian envelopes), take the modulus, convolve again, and spatially average. First-order coefficients capture scale-by-scale amplitudes; second-order coefficients capture how structures at different scales and orientations interact. The paper reduces this to two orientation-averaged ratios: $s_{21}$ (sparsity) and $s_{22}$ (shape). It is these ratios, computed across scale pairs $j_1, j_2$, that carry the discrimination: they quantify the localization and anisotropy that distinguish filaments, eddies, and wave patterns, while remaining insensitive to the Fourier phases that the power spectrum ignores.

What would settle it

Recompute the isotropic power spectra of the $\nabla^2 h$ fields at $t=1000$ for both the balanced and inertia-gravity-wave ensembles and compare them; if they have diverged, the 'identical power spectra' claim for that case is not established. A stronger test would phase-randomize one balanced snapshot to force identical spectra and check whether the ST still separates the fields.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that morphology, not just spectral power, identifies oceanic flow regimes. Two summary scattering statistics—sparsity $s_{21}$, which measures how localized or clustered features are, and shape $s_{22}$, which measures whether structures are smooth or elongated—separate dynamical classes. For equal power spectra, the scattering coefficients remain distinct because they retain phase and spatial information that the power spectrum discards. The paper demonstrates this for 2D versus SQG turbulence with matched $E(k)\propto k^{-5/3}$ spectra, and for balanced shallow-water flow versus inertia-gravity waves initialized from the same Garrett-Munk spectrum. In realistic sea surface height fields the statistics separate western and eastern North Atlantic regions and reveal a winter-to-summer shift toward wave-dominated signals.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, in the wave-versus-balanced shallow-water experiment, the two flow types still have identical power spectra when the scattering transform is applied; the initial spectra are matched, but the spectra at analysis time are not shown.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Single snapshots of sea surface height can be classified by dynamical regime, making temporally sparse altimetry such as SWOT useful for separating waves from balanced motion.
  • Model evaluation gains a stricter test: simulations must reproduce not only spectral slopes but also the geometry of fronts, filaments, eddies, and waves.
  • Because the statistics are scale-resolved, they identify the wavenumber range over which waves or balanced flow dominates, as shown for 4–8 km versus 32–64 km scales.
  • The method transfers to other spatial maps, such as airborne or coastal radar, and to other geophysical fields.
  • Seasonal and regional contrasts in upper-ocean dynamics can be tracked from daily snapshots without temporal filtering.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One consequence the paper leaves implicit is that the ST statistics could serve as an unsupervised diagnostic for satellite swath data, flagging regions where internal tides contaminate the balanced signal without requiring harmonic fits to time series.
  • A direct extension, not tested here, would be to check whether $s_{21}$ and $s_{22}$ remain robust to realistic altimeter noise, swath gaps, and the anisotropic sampling of SWOT.
  • Because sparsity and shape vary with scale, the same machinery could be applied to subsurface fields such as buoyancy or tracer concentrations to compare stirring geometry across models and observations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the scattering transform (ST) as a diagnostic for characterizing the geometry of upper-ocean flows beyond what can be learned from power spectra. It defines two scale-dependent summary statistics—s21 (sparsity) and s22 (shape)—and shows, in three experimental settings, that they separate dynamical regimes: (i) 2D inverse-cascade turbulence versus surface quasi-geostrophic (SQG) forward-cascade turbulence, both configured to have kinetic-energy spectra with k^{-5/3} slopes; (ii) balanced turbulence versus inertia-gravity waves in freely decaying shallow-water equations initialized with identical k^{-2} kinetic-energy spectra; and (iii) two regions of a realistic North Atlantic simulation with different balances between mesoscale/submesoscale turbulence and internal waves. The paper argues that the ST extracts phase/geometry information that the power spectrum discards, and it positions the method as a framework for interpreting SWOT sea-surface-height snapshots. The code and packages used are publicly available.

Significance. The central claim—that the ST can distinguish flows even when their power spectra are identical—is of considerable interest for oceanography, because many observed flows share similar spectral slopes. The 2D-versus-SQG experiment in Section 3 is well posed: the analyzed ∇²ψ fields share the same power-law spectrum, the ensemble statistics show small error bars, and the differences in s21 and s22 are consistent with the visual morphology. The realistic North Atlantic application uses an independent temporal filter as a ground-truth check, which is a sound validation strategy. The paper is clearly written and uses open-source, reproducible tools, which are strengths. However, the strongest claim is not fully supported for the balanced-versus-IGW experiment in Section 4, where the spectra are matched only at initialization and not verified at the analysis time; this is the case closest to the satellite-altimetry motivation. The manuscript needs to address this gap or carefully qualify its claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, Fig. 3] The abstract claims that the ST distinguishes balanced flows and internal waves 'even when their power spectra are identical,' but the balanced-versus-IGW shallow-water experiment does not verify that the two ensembles have identical power spectra at the time the ST is applied. The simulations are initialized with matched E(k) ∝ k^{-2} spectra, yet the ST is applied to ∇²h at t=1000, after the balanced flow has undergone an inverse cascade and filament sharpening while the IGW field has dispersed and smoothed through weak nonlinear interactions. The manuscript does not show the power spectra of the analyzed ∇²h fields at t=1000 or at the times displayed in Fig. 3c. Because s21 and s22 are scale-dependent statistics, a spectral rearrangement alone could produce differences between the ensembles, so the claimed geometric discrimination is not established for this experiment. Please provide the ensemble-mean spectra at the analysis time, or perform a controlled test with spectra matched at the analysis time, and adjust the claims accordingly. If the spectra differ at t=1000, restrict the 'identical power spectra' claim to the 2D-versus-SQG experiment or phrase it more cautiously.
  2. [Section 3 and Abstract] The abstract states that the ST distinguishes 'types of turbulence—even when their power spectra are identical,' but Section 3 describes the 2D and SQG simulations as configured to equilibrate 'with identical spectral slopes in their inertial ranges,' not with identical power spectra. The analyzed ∇²ψ fields will then have the same power-law slope, but the text does not state whether the full spectra (including prefactor and dissipation-range structure) coincide over the analyzed scales. Since s21 and s22 are amplitude-ratio statistics, a global amplitude difference would not matter, but differences in the shape of the spectrum (e.g., inertial-range boundaries) could still influence the scale-dependent statistics. Please either show that the power spectra of the analyzed fields are identical in the analyzed range, or rephrase the claim to 'even when their power spectra have the same slope' or 'similar power spectra.' This distinction is directly relevant to the paper's headline claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 7.3] The text contains a typo: 'Guassian random fields' should read 'Gaussian random fields.'
  2. [Section 7.4] The model start date '06-12-2025' appears to be a future date relative to the manuscript submission; please clarify whether this is a model time or a calendar date, and if it is a typo, correct it.
  3. [Section 3 and Figure 2] In the SQG case, the dynamically active field is the surface buoyancy ξ = |∇|ψ, while the text and figure caption refer to the analyzed field as 'the vorticity field ∇²ψ' for both 2D and SQG turbulence. The analysis of ∇²ψ for SQG is a legitimate choice, but the terminology should be explained to avoid confusion.
  4. [Equation (4)] The definition of s22(j1,j2) = ⟨S∥2/S⊥2⟩_{l1} would be clearer if the text explicitly stated that for each l1 the average is over second-order coefficients whose wavelet orientation l2 is parallel (∥) or perpendicular (⊥) to l1.
  5. [Section 5] A brief discussion of the robustness of the ST summary statistics to measurement noise would be useful, since SWOT observations will contain significant noise and the Laplacian ∇²h amplifies small-scale noise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scattering-transform diagnostics are fixed transforms with no label-fitted parameters; the shallow-water 'identical spectra at analysis time' gap is an evidentiary issue, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The scattering transform (ST) coefficients S1 and S2, and the summary statistics s21 and s22, are fixed functions of the input field (Eqs. 1-4), with no parameters fitted to the labels 'balanced,' 'IGW,' '2D,' or 'SQG.' The discrimination results therefore do not reduce by construction to a fit. In the 2D-vs-SQG experiment, the matched k^-5/3 kinetic-energy spectra are shown at equilibrium (Fig. 2i), and the ST differences are reported as ensemble statistics with standard deviations. In the shallow-water experiment, the E(k) proportional to k^-2 spectra are matched at initialization, but the paper does not display spectra at t=1000, when the ST is applied; nonlinear balanced evolution could plausibly have reshaped the spectrum. This is a verification gap in the 'even when their power spectra are identical' claim for that particular case, not a circular reduction: the ST has no tunable parameters, the distinction is not defined in terms of the ST outputs, and no parameter is renamed as a prediction. The realistic-ocean analysis is independently checked against a subinertial temporal filter: the full-versus-subinertial comparison is a separate, externally imposed separation that agrees with the ST differences, providing non-circular validation. Self-citations (e.g., Lawrence & Callies 2022; Sinha, Callies & Menemenlis 2023) supply context, simulation setup, and physical interpretation; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the central claim. No self-definitional, fitted-input, ansatz-smuggled-via-citation, or renaming pattern is present. The sparsity/shape interpretation of s21 and s22 is illustrative (Fig. 1b), not an assumption of the conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted parameters. The main assumptions are that the scattering transform's known properties hold for ocean fields, that the turbulence simulations have matched spectra, that the Eulerian filter is sufficient for wave/balanced separation, and that the modified shallow-water model is representative. These assumptions are standard within the methodology but not independently verified within this paper.

free parameters (2)
  • Scattering transform hyperparameters (Morlet wavelet width sigma, oscillation wavenumber k0, max scale J, number of… = sigma = 0.8 * 2^j, |k0| = 3*pi/(4*2^j), J=8, L=4
    Chosen by hand for the presented fields. The paper states results are unchanged up to 1024x1024 resolution with J=log2 N, but no systematic sensitivity analysis is provided for these choices.
  • Analyzed scale range (j1, j2) for summary statistics = j1=2-5, j2=2-7 (4-32 km and 4-128 km for realistic fields)
    The paper excludes grid and domain scales because they are affected by damping. This selection is based on physical intuition and could influence the separability of the regimes.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The scattering transform captures phase information beyond the power spectrum and preserves enough structure to distinguish geometric differences in fields.
    Relies on results from Mallat 2012 and Cheng & Ménard 2021, and on Fig. 1a. The paper does not re-derive these properties.
  • domain assumption The turbulence simulations (2D and SQG) at equilibrium have identical kinetic-energy spectra and thus identical power spectra of the analyzed ∇²ψ fields.
    The paper configures forcing and dissipation to produce identical spectral slopes, but the power spectra of the analyzed fields are only implied, not directly shown in the paper. This is essential to the 'identical power spectra' claim.
  • domain assumption The Eulerian subinertial filter with cutoff at the local Coriolis frequency adequately separates balanced motions from waves in the realistic North Atlantic simulation.
    Section 5 footnote: 'Lagrangian filtering would be preferable but the Eulerian filter is sufficient for the ST analysis.' The interpretation of full vs subinertial differences relies on this.
  • domain assumption The Bühler (1998) modification of the shallow-water equations prevents nonlinear steepening of gravity waves and does not bias the balanced-vs-IGW comparison.
    Supplementary 7.3. The modified equations suppress wave breaking, so the IGW field remains largely linear, which may not represent real ocean internal waves.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Characterizing Ocean Flows with the Scattering Transform." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QRUMC4K2

@misc{pith2026250500819,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Characterizing Ocean Flows with the Scattering Transform},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QRUMC4K2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.00819}
}
read the original abstract

Upper-ocean flows are a multi-scale jigsaw puzzle of turbulence and waves. Characterizing these flows is essential for understanding their role in redistributing heat, carbon, and nutrients, yet power spectral analysis cannot always distinguish between types of motion. We show that the scattering transform (ST), a wavelet convolution method, can extract geometric information from flow fields, offering insights beyond the power spectrum. The ST distinguishes balanced dynamics, internal waves, and types of turbulence -- even when their power spectra are identical. Applied to sea surface height (SSH) fields from ocean models, the ST differentiates regions with distinct underlying dynamics. Our analysis offers a framework for interpreting SSH from satellite altimetry missions and for analyzing other spatial maps (e.g., from airborne and coastal radar). More generally, the ST is an appealing way to characterize complex fluid motion in a variety of geophysical contexts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.00819 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Building intuition for the scattering transform. (a) Comparison on structural information cap￾tured by the power spectrum, bispectrum, and scattering transform. A turbulent vorticity field (left panel) with spatially intermittent and geometrically complex multi-scale structures is reconstructed using the in￾formation captured by each method. The power spectrum reconstruction randomizes the Fourier phases of the turb… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distinguishing balanced flows and inertia–gravity waves (IGWs). (a) Balanced and (b) IGW flow fields and their shape and sparsity from shallow-water simulations. Snapshots of ∇2h, where h is sur￾face height, at t = 1000 are shown alongside shape and sparsity coefficients averaged over 20 ensemble members (error bars show standard deviations). (c) Time series of shape and sparsity for individual simu￾lations in each … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Waves and balanced flows in a realistic simulation of the North Atlantic Ocean. (a) Snapshot of ∇2h, where h is SSH, on March 3 (using an arsinh-scaled color map). (b) Magnified regions of interest in the western and eastern North Atlantic, where the fields at small sc…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Characterizing the shape and sparsity of realistic fields. Shown are snapshots of ∇2h in the ENA and WNA regions with axes in units of grid points and 90-day averages of the shape and sparsity coefficients for j1 = 2 to 5 and j2 = 2 to 7, characterizing structures with…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Seasonal evolution of the shape and sparsity in the ENA and WNA regions. Shown are time series of sparsity s21 and shape s22 from daily snapshots of ∇2h. Values are shown for both the full and subinertial fields for spatial scales of (a) 4 to 8 km ( j1 = 2, j2 = 3) and…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    apacite url apacite =6pt Acknowledgments. 6pt 1sp \@dates Received \@recvdate\@empty\@rcvaccrule \@recvdate \@revisedate\@empty ; revised \@revisedate; \@accptdate\@empty \@revisedate\@empty; accepted \@accptdate \@pubdate\@empty. ; published \@pubdate. -2pt \@authaddrs @list\@empty =.15in @list 1sp @list =9pt plus 2pt minus 6pt \@sluginfo width 4pc =3000...

    2001

  2. [2]

    gc" journal option for G-Cubed Nov 3, 2003 M Kelly, fixed noindent in subsubsubsection titles and for all sections in rog option Oct 2, 2003 M Kelly, added

    \@ifstar \@figbox \@figbox \@figbox#1#2#3 to !#1! #3 [#1][c] !#2!#3 \@tempdima#2 \@tempdima by2 \@tempdima by- \@tempdima by- \@height\@tempdima\@depth\@tempdima\@width @ to @ #3 Bib ??? ??? ??? =0 =0 = @figure=0 @table=0 #1 --#1 -24pt -2ex #1 0= #1 to 0 #1 I NDEX T ERMS: #1 #1 Citation: #1 Feb 9, 2009 Changed name and references to name from agu2001 to a...

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    , Marchand, T

    allys_2020 APACrefauthors Allys, E. , Marchand, T. , Cardoso, J F. , Villaescusa-Navarro, F. , Ho, S. \ Mallat, S. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . New interpretable statistics for large-scale structure analysis and generation New interpretable statistics for large-scale structure analysis and generation . Physical Review D 102 10 103506

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    , Angles, T

    Andreuxetal_2020 APACrefauthors Andreux, M. , Angles, T. , Exarchakis, G. , Leonarduzzi, R. , Rochette, G. , Thiry, L. Eickenberg, M. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Kymatio: Scattering Transforms in Python Kymatio: Scattering transforms in python . Journal of Machine Learning Research 21 60 1--6 . APACrefURL http://jmlr.org/papers/v21/19-047.html APACrefURL

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    , Polzin, K L

    Arbicetal_2013 APACrefauthors Arbic, B K. , Polzin, K L. , Scott, R B. , Richman, J G. \ Shriver, J F. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . On eddy viscosity, energy cascades, and the horizontal resolution of gridded satellite altimeter products On eddy viscosity, energy cascades, and the horizontal resolution of gridded satellite altimeter products . Journal of Physi...

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    \ Flament, P

    armi_1985 APACrefauthors Armi, L. \ Flament, P. APACrefauthors \ 1985 11 . Cautionary remarks on the spectral interpretation of turbulent flows Cautionary remarks on the spectral interpretation of turbulent flows . Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 90 C6 11779--11782 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/JC090iC06p11779 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1029/jc090ic06p11779 1985

  7. [7]

    APACrefauthors \ 1953

    batchelor_1953 APACrefauthors Batchelor, G K. APACrefauthors \ 1953 . The theory of homogeneous turbulence The theory of homogeneous turbulence . Cambridge university press

    work page 1953

  8. [8]

    \ Santos-Victor, J

    bernardino_2005 APACrefauthors Bernardino, A. \ Santos-Victor, J. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . A real-time gabor primal sketch for visual attention A real-time gabor primal sketch for visual attention . Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis Iberian conference on pattern recognition and image analysis \ ( \ 335--342)

    work page 2005

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    APACrefauthors \ 1978 05

    blumen_1978 APACrefauthors Blumen, W. APACrefauthors \ 1978 05 . Uniform Potential Vorticity Flow : Part I . Theory of Wave Interactions and Two - Dimensional Turbulence Uniform Potential Vorticity Flow : Part I . Theory of Wave Interactions and Two - Dimensional Turbulence . ...

    1978 doi

  2. [10]

    \ Mallat, S

    bruna_2013 APACrefauthors Bruna, J. \ Mallat, S. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Invariant scattering convolution networks Invariant scattering convolution networks . IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 35 8 1872--1886

    2013

  3. [11]

    APACrefauthors \ 1998

    buhler_shallow-water_1998 APACrefauthors B \"u hler, O. APACrefauthors \ 1998 . A Shallow-Water Model That Prevents Nonlinear Steepening of Gravity Waves A shallow-water model that prevents nonlinear steepening of gravity waves . Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    1998

  4. [12]

    , Callies, J

    Buhleretal_2014 APACrefauthors B \"u hler, O. , Callies, J. \ Ferrari, R. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Wave--vortex decomposition of one-dimensional ship-track data Wave--vortex decomposition of one-dimensional ship-track data . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 756 1007--1026

    2014

  5. [13]

    \ Muller, C J

    buhler&muller_2007 APACrefauthors B \"u hler, O. \ Muller, C J. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Instability and focusing of internal tides in the deep ocean Instability and focusing of internal tides in the deep ocean . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 588 1--28

    2007

  6. [14]

    , Vasil , G M

    Dedalus APACrefauthors Burns , K J. , Vasil , G M. , Oishi , J S. , Lecoanet , D. \ Brown , B P. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Dedalus: A flexible framework for numerical simulations with spectral methods Dedalus: A flexible framework for numerical simulations with spectral methods ...

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    \ Ferrari, R

    callies&ferarri_2013 APACrefauthors Callies, J. \ Ferrari, R. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Interpreting energy and tracer spectra of upper-ocean turbulence in the submesoscale range (1--200 km) Interpreting energy and tracer spectra of upper-ocean turbulence in the submesoscale ran...

    2013

  8. [16]

    , Ferrari, R

    callies_2015 APACrefauthors Callies, J. , Ferrari, R. , Klymak, J M. \ Gula, J. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Seasonality in submesoscale turbulence Seasonality in submesoscale turbulence . Nature communications 6 1 6862

    2015

  9. [17]

    , Flierl, G

    callies_2016 APACrefauthors Callies, J. , Flierl, G. , Ferrari, R. \ Fox-Kemper, B. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . The role of mixed-layer instabilities in submesoscale turbulence The role of mixed-layer instabilities in submesoscale turbulence . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 788 5--41

    2016

  10. [18]

    callies&wu_2019 APACrefauthors Callies, J. \ Wu, W. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Some expectations for submesoscale sea surface height variance spectra Some expectations for submesoscale sea surface height variance spectra . Journal of Physical Oceanography 49 9 2271--2289

    2019

  11. [19]

    , McWilliams, J C

    capet_2008 APACrefauthors Capet, X. , McWilliams, J C. , Molemaker, M J. \ Shchepetkin, A F. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Mesoscale to submesoscale transition in the California Current System. Part III: Energy balance and flux Mesoscale to submesoscale transition in the california ...

    2008

  12. [20]

    \ Klein, P

    Chavanne&Klein_2010 APACrefauthors Chavanne, C P. \ Klein, P. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Can oceanic submesoscale processes be observed with satellite altimetry? Can oceanic submesoscale processes be observed with satellite altimetry? Geophysical Research Letters 37 22

    2010

  13. [21]

    \ M \'e nard, B

    cheng_2021 APACrefauthors Cheng, S. \ M \'e nard, B. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . How to Quantify Fields or Textures? A Guide to the Scattering Transform How to quantify fields or textures? A guide to the scattering transform . arXiv:2112.01288 . APACrefDOI doi:10.48550/arXiv.2112....

    2021 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    , Morel, R

    Chengetal_2024 APACrefauthors Cheng, S. , Morel, R. , Allys, E. , M \'e nard, B. \ Mallat, S. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Scattering spectra models for physics Scattering spectra models for physics . PNAS nexus 3 4 pgae103

    2024

  15. [23]

    , Ting, Y S

    cheng_2020 APACrefauthors Cheng, S. , Ting, Y S. , M \'e nard, B. \ Bruna, J. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . A new approach to observational cosmology using the scattering transform A new approach to observational cosmology using the scattering transform . Monthly Notices of the Roya...

    2020

  16. [24]

    , Rocha, C B

    Chereskinetal_2019 APACrefauthors Chereskin, T K. , Rocha, C B. , Gille, S T. , Menemenlis, D. \ Passaro, M. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Characterizing the transition from balanced to unbalanced motions in the southern California Current Characterizing the transition from balanced...

    2019

  17. [25]

    \ Wunsch, C

    Ferrari&Wunsch_2010 APACrefauthors Ferrari, R. \ Wunsch, C. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . The distribution of eddy kinetic and potential energies in the global ocean The distribution of eddy kinetic and potential energies in the global ocean . Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Ocean...

    2010

  18. [26]

    APACrefauthors \ 1995

    frisch_1995 APACrefauthors Frisch, U. APACrefauthors \ 1995 . Turbulence: The Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov Turbulence: The legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov . Cambridge University Press

    1995

  19. [27]

    , Alsdorf, D

    Fuetal_2009 APACrefauthors Fu, L L. , Alsdorf, D. , Rodriguez, E. , Morrow, R. , Mognard, N. , Lambin, J. Lafon, T. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . The SWOT (Surface Water and Ocean Topography) mission: Spaceborne radar interferometry for oceanographic and hydrological applications Th...

    2009

  20. [28]

    , Pavelsky, T

    Fuetal_2024 APACrefauthors Fu, L L. , Pavelsky, T. , Cretaux, J F. , Morrow, R. , Farrar, J T. , Vaze, P. others APACrefauthors \ 2024 . The surface water and ocean topography mission: A breakthrough in radar remote sensing of the ocean and land surface water The surface water...

    2024

  21. [29]

    APACrefauthors \ 1989

    gargett_1989 APACrefauthors Gargett, A E. APACrefauthors \ 1989 . Ocean turbulence Ocean turbulence . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 21 1 419--451

    1989

  22. [30]

    \ Kunze, E

    garrett_kunze_2007 APACrefauthors Garrett, C. \ Kunze, E. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Internal tide generation in the deep ocean Internal tide generation in the deep ocean . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39 1 57--87

    2007

  23. [31]

    \ Munk, W

    Garrett&Munk_1972 APACrefauthors Garrett, C. \ Munk, W. APACrefauthors \ 1972 . Space–time scales of internal waves. Space–time scales of internal waves. \ ( 2)

    1972

  24. [32]

    , Lam, F P A

    Gerkemaetal_2004 APACrefauthors Gerkema, T. , Lam, F P A. \ Maas, L R. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . Internal tides in the Bay of Biscay: conversion rates and seasonal effects Internal tides in the bay of biscay: conversion rates and seasonal effects . Deep Sea Research Part II: Top...

    2004

  25. [33]

    , Pierrehumbert, R T

    held_1995 APACrefauthors Held, I M. , Pierrehumbert, R T. , Garner, S T. \ Swanson, K L. APACrefauthors \ 1995 . Surface quasi-geostrophic dynamics Surface quasi-geostrophic dynamics . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 282 1--20

    1995

  26. [34]

    , Briegleb, B P

    jochum_2013 APACrefauthors Jochum, M. , Briegleb, B P. , Danabasoglu, G. , Large, W G. , Norton, N J. , Jayne, S R. Bryan, F O. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . The Impact of Oceanic Near-Inertial Waves on Climate The impact of oceanic near-inertial waves on climate . Journal of Climat...

    2013 doi

  27. [35]

    \ Lapeyre, G

    klein_2009 APACrefauthors Klein, P. \ Lapeyre, G. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . The Oceanic Vertical Pump Induced by Mesoscale and Submesoscale Turbulence The oceanic vertical pump induced by mesoscale and submesoscale turbulence \ [Journal Article]. Annual Review of Marine Science ...

    2009

  28. [36]

    APACrefauthors \ 1941 01

    Kolmogorov_1941 APACrefauthors Kolmogorov , A. APACrefauthors \ 1941 01 . The Local Structure of Turbulence in Incompressible Viscous Fluid for Very Large Reynolds' Numbers The Local Structure of Turbulence in Incompressible Viscous Fluid for Very Large Reynolds' Numbers . Aka...

    1941

  29. [37]

    APACrefauthors \ 1967

    kraichnan_1967 APACrefauthors Kraichnan, R H. APACrefauthors \ 1967 . Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence . Physics of fluids 10 7 1417

    1967

  30. [38]

    , Gula, J

    lahaye_2019 APACrefauthors Lahaye, N. , Gula, J. \ Roullet, G. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Sea surface signature of internal tides Sea surface signature of internal tides . Geophysical Research Letters 46 7 3880--3890

    2019

  31. [39]

    \ Callies, J

    lawrence_2022 APACrefauthors Lawrence, A. \ Callies, J. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Seasonality and spatial dependence of mesoscale and submesoscale ocean currents from along-track satellite altimetry Seasonality and spatial dependence of mesoscale and submesoscale ocean currents ...

    2022

  32. [40]

    , Ferrari, R

    levy_2012 APACrefauthors L \'e vy, M. , Ferrari, R. , Franks, P J. , Martin, A P. \ Rivi \`e re, P. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Bringing physics to life at the submesoscale Bringing physics to life at the submesoscale . Geophysical Research Letters 39 14

    2012

  33. [41]

    , Franks, P J

    levy_2018 APACrefauthors L \'e vy, M. , Franks, P J. \ Smith, K S. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . The role of submesoscale currents in structuring marine ecosystems The role of submesoscale currents in structuring marine ecosystems . Nature communications 9 1 4758

    2018

  34. [42]

    APACrefauthors \ 2016 01

    mahadevan_2016 APACrefauthors Mahadevan, A. APACrefauthors \ 2016 01 . The Impact of Submesoscale Physics on Primary Productivity of Plankton The Impact of Submesoscale Physics on Primary Productivity of Plankton . Annual Review of Marine Science 8 1 161--184

    2016

  35. [43]

    APACrefauthors \ 2012

    Mallat_2012 APACrefauthors Mallat, S. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Group Invariant Scattering Group invariant scattering . Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 65 10 1331-1398 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21413 APACrefDOI

    2012 doi

  36. [44]

    , Shuckburgh, E

    marshall_2006 APACrefauthors Marshall, J. , Shuckburgh, E. , Jones, H. \ Hill, C. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Estimates and implications of surface eddy diffusivity in the Southern Ocean derived from tracer transport Estimates and implications of surface eddy diffusivity in the so...

    2006

  37. [45]

    APACrefauthors \ 2016

    mcwilliams_2016 APACrefauthors McWilliams, J C. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Submesoscale currents in the ocean Submesoscale currents in the ocean . Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 472 2189 20160117

    2016

  38. [46]

    , Garraffo, Z

    mensa_2013 APACrefauthors Mensa, J A. , Garraffo, Z. , Griffa, A. , \"O zg \"o kmen, T M. , Haza, A. \ Veneziani, M. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Seasonality of the submesoscale dynamics in the Gulf Stream region Seasonality of the submesoscale dynamics in the gulf stream region . ...

    2013

  39. [47]

    , Fu, L L

    Morrowetal_2019 APACrefauthors Morrow, R. , Fu, L L. , Ardhuin, F. , Benkiran, M. , Chapron, B. , Cosme, E. others APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Global observations of fine-scale ocean surface topography with the surface water and ocean topography (SWOT) mission Global observations ...

    2019

  40. [48]

    \ Le Traon, P Y

    morrow_2012 APACrefauthors Morrow, R. \ Le Traon, P Y. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Recent advances in observing mesoscale ocean dynamics with satellite altimetry Recent advances in observing mesoscale ocean dynamics with satellite altimetry . Advances in Space Research 50 8 1062--1076

    2012

  41. [49]

    \ Lim, J

    Oppenheim&Lim_1981 APACrefauthors Oppenheim, A. \ Lim, J. APACrefauthors \ 1981 . The importance of phase in signals The importance of phase in signals . Proceedings of the IEEE 69 5 529-541 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1109/PROC.1981.12022 APACrefDOI

    1981

  42. [50]

    , Held, I M

    Pierrehumbert_1994 APACrefauthors Pierrehumbert, R T. , Held, I M. \ Swanson, K L. APACrefauthors \ 1994 . Spectra of local and nonlocal two-dimensional turbulence Spectra of local and nonlocal two-dimensional turbulence . Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 4 6 1111-1116 . Special Iss...

    1994 doi

  43. [51]

    \ Zaron, E D

    ray&zaron_2016 APACrefauthors Ray, R D. \ Zaron, E D. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . M2 internal tides and their observed wavenumber spectra from satellite altimetry M2 internal tides and their observed wavenumber spectra from satellite altimetry . Journal of Physical Oceanography 46 1 3--22

    2016

  44. [52]

    APACrefauthors \ 1969

    reeves_1969 APACrefauthors Reeves, P M. APACrefauthors \ 1969 . A non-Gaussian turbulence simulation A non-gaussian turbulence simulation \ ( 69)\ ( 67). Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force

    1969

  45. [53]

    , Arbic, B K

    richman_2012 APACrefauthors Richman, J G. , Arbic, B K. , Shriver, J F. , Metzger, E J. \ Wallcraft, A J. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Inferring dynamics from the wavenumber spectra of an eddying global ocean model with embedded tides Inferring dynamics from the wavenumber spectra ...

    2012

  46. [54]

    , Gille, S T

    rocha_2016 APACrefauthors Rocha, C B. , Gille, S T. , Chereskin, T K. \ Menemenlis, D. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Seasonality of submesoscale dynamics in the Kuroshio Extension Seasonality of submesoscale dynamics in the kuroshio extension . Geophysical Research Letters 43 21 11--304

    2016

  47. [55]

    APACrefauthors \ 2022

    SDSC2022 APACrefauthors San Diego Supercomputer Center . APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Triton Shared Computing Cluster . Triton Shared Computing Cluster . Service . University of California, San Diego. https://doi.org/10.57873/T34W2R

    2022 doi

  48. [56]

    , Klein, P

    Sasakietal_2014 APACrefauthors Sasaki, H. , Klein, P. , Qiu, B. \ Sasai, Y. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Impact of oceanic-scale interactions on the seasonal modulation of ocean dynamics by the atmosphere Impact of oceanic-scale interactions on the seasonal modulation of ocean dyna...

    2014

  49. [57]

    , Callies , J

    Sinha_2023 APACrefauthors Sinha , A. , Callies , J. \ Menemenlis , D. APACrefauthors \ 2023 04 . Do Submesoscales Affect the Large-Scale Structure of the Upper Ocean? Do Submesoscales Affect the Large-Scale Structure of the Upper Ocean? Journal of Physical Oceanography 53 1025...

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    , Boccaletti, G

    smith_2002 APACrefauthors Smith, K S. , Boccaletti, G. , Henning, C C. , Marinov, I. , Tam, C Y. , Held, I M. \ Vallis, G K. APACrefauthors \ 2002 10 . Turbulent diffusion in the geostrophic inverse cascade Turbulent diffusion in the geostrophic inverse cascade . Journal of Fl...

    2002 doi

  51. [59]

    \ Thompson, A F

    taylor&thompson_2023 APACrefauthors Taylor, J R. \ Thompson, A F. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Submesoscale dynamics in the upper ocean Submesoscale dynamics in the upper ocean . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 55 1 103--127

    2023

  52. [60]

    thorpe_2007 APACrefauthors Thorpe, S A. \ . APACrefauthors \ 2007 . An introduction to ocean turbulence An introduction to ocean turbulence \ ( 10). Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    2007

  53. [61]

    , Klein, P

    Torresetal_2018 APACrefauthors Torres, H S. , Klein, P. , Menemenlis, D. , Qiu, B. , Su, Z. , Wang, J. Fu, L L. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Partitioning ocean motions into balanced motions and internal gravity waves: A modeling study in anticipation of future space missions Partit...

    2018

  54. [62]

    APACrefauthors \ 1976

    townsend_1976 APACrefauthors Townsend, A. APACrefauthors \ 1976 . The structure of turbulent shear flow The structure of turbulent shear flow . Cambridge university press

    1976

  55. [63]

    APACrefauthors \ 2017

    Vallis2017 APACrefauthors Vallis, G K. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics: Fundamentals and Large-Scale Circulation Atmospheric and oceanic fluid dynamics: Fundamentals and large-scale circulation \ ( 2 \ ). Cambridge University Press

    2017

  56. [64]

    , de Lavergne , C

    whalen_2020 APACrefauthors Whalen, C B. , de Lavergne , C. , Naveira Garabato, A C. , Klymak, J M. , MacKinnon, J A. \ Sheen, K L. APACrefauthors \ 2020 11 . Internal Wave-Driven Mixing: Governing Processes and Consequences for Climate Internal wave-driven mixing: Governing pr...

    2020 doi

  57. [65]

    APACrefauthors \ 2007

    wunch_2007 APACrefauthors Wunsch, C. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . The past and future ocean circulation from a contemporary perspective The past and future ocean circulation from a contemporary perspective . A. Schmittner, J C H. Chiang \ S R. Hemming\ ( ), Geophysical Monograph Se...

    2007 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.