REVIEW 5 cited by
Technical Report: Evaluating Goal Drift in Language Model Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As language models (LMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, their robust adherence to human-assigned objectives becomes crucial for safe operation. When these agents operate independently for extended periods without human oversight, even initially well-specified goals may gradually shift. Detecting and measuring goal drift - an agent's tendency to deviate from its original objective over time - presents significant challenges, as goals can shift gradually, causing only subtle behavioral changes. This paper proposes a novel approach to analyzing goal drift in LM agents. In our experiments, agents are first explicitly given a goal through their system prompt, then exposed to competing objectives through environmental pressures. We demonstrate that while the best-performing agent (a scaffolded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet) maintains nearly perfect goal adherence for more than 100,000 tokens in our most difficult evaluation setting, all evaluated models exhibit some degree of goal drift. We also find that goal drift correlates with models' increasing susceptibility to pattern-matching behaviors as the context length grows.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Model or Harness? An Interaction-Centric Taxonomy for Localizing Agent Failures
The paper introduces a 41-mode taxonomy that assigns each agent failure to an interaction edge and a fault side, and shows LLM judges can reproduce the labels with Cohen's κ=0.76.
-
From Cognitive Architectures to Language Agents: A Mechanism-Level Review of Lineage, Convergence, and Migration Gaps
Coding each mechanism for evidence of lineage and implementation depth, the review closes one candidate gap (GraSP) and isolates five residual control bundles for language agents.
-
A Taxonomy of Cognitive Capability Gaps in Generative and Agentic AI
The paper organizes persistent AI limitations into a five-part taxonomy of cognitive capability gaps and proposes a conceptual ACIA architecture and cognition-centric metrics, none of which are validated.
-
Engineering Trustworthy Agentic AI for Critical Systems
A survey claiming that agentic AI trustworthiness is a single cross-domain problem and outlining a framework for graded, certifiable assurance.
-
Adaptive Monitoring and Real-World Evaluation of Agentic AI Systems
AMDM combines EWMA thresholds with joint Mahalanobis detection to flag goal drift and other anomalies in agentic AI, reducing simulated detection latency and false positives versus static thresholds.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.