Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

A generalized solution for advection-dominated accretion flow, standard disc, and slim disc

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One set of accretion equations reproduces all four black-hole disc states.

desk verdict A genuinely unifying self-similar accretion solution with solid benchmarks, but the low-rate ADAF branch rests on an electron energy balance that the authors themselves show breaks down below mdot ~ 1e-3. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03583 v1 pith:POK7N527 submitted 2025-05-06 astro-ph.HE

Mingjun Liu , B. F. Liu , Yilong Wang , Huaqing Cheng , Weimin Yuan This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords accretiondiscsadvection-dominatedflowslimdiscstandardthinblackholephotontrappingself-similarsolutiontwo-temperatureplasma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a single generalized set of height-averaged, axisymmetric accretion equations, solved with a self-similar ansatz, contains all four classic black-hole accretion solutions as special branches: the Shakura–Sunyaev thin disc (SSD), the Shapiro–Lightman–Eardley solution (SLE), the slim disc, and the advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF). Across accretion rates from sub-Eddington to super-Eddington, the same algebraic solution reproduces each branch and the expected S-curve in the $\dot{m}$–$\Sigma$ plane. A sympathetic reader would care because it offers a unified description of how an accreting black hole changes state, including the smooth radial transition from thin disc to slim disc when photon trapping sets in and the coexistence of ADAF and SSD below a critical rate.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the generalized height-averaged energy equation together with the generalized radiation pressure $p_{\rm r} = (F_{\rm rad}/2c)(\tau+2/\sqrt{3})$, in which the same formula covers optically thin and optically thick flows, and the electron energy balance $q_{ie}=q_{\rm rad}$, which fixes the two-temperature structure. The self-similar ansatz reduces the differential equations to algebraic relations for velocities, sound speed, scale height, and density as functions of the advection fraction $f$ and the generalized adiabatic exponent $\Gamma_3$; an ergodic-bisection search finds the roots of $f$, $\chi=p_{\rm r}/p$, $T_i$, and $T_e$. This machinery is what lets the four classical solutions appear as different roots of one system rather than as separately constructed models.

What would settle it

Measure the X-ray luminosity of a quiescent or hard-state stellar-mass black hole together with an independent estimate of its mass accretion rate at $\dot{m}\lesssim10^{-3}$: the unification predicts $L\propto\dot{m}^2$ for the ADAF, whereas including direct electron viscous heating would give $L\propto\dot m$, so the observed scaling decides which energy balance is right.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that one algebraic solution of the generalized equations describes all four accretion states, with the advection fraction $f = q_{\rm int}/(q_c+q_{\rm vis})$ and a generalized adiabatic exponent $\Gamma_3$ carrying the unification. Including entropy advection, generalized radiation pressure valid for both optically thin and thick flows, and photon trapping, the solution produces the ADAF, SLE, SSD, and slim disc branches as distinct roots in the $\dot m$–$f$ plane, and an S-curve in the $\dot m$–$\Sigma$ plane whose SSD and slim disc segments match earlier results. At a fixed super-Eddington rate the solution gives a hybrid radial structure: outer regions follow the SSD while the inner region becomes a slim disc, with a smooth transition at the photon-trapping radius. The paper also derives luminosities, radiation efficiencies, and spectra for a $10\,M_\odot$ black hole over a wide range of accretion rates.

Load-bearing premise

The whole unification rests on treating the electron energy equation as a balance between Coulomb heating and radiative cooling alone, which is only justified for accretion rates above roughly $10^{-3}$ Eddington; below that, neglected advection and direct viscous heating of electrons could change the ADAF's structure and luminosity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the unification is right, the state of an accreting black hole at any radius and accretion rate is fixed by one continuous solution, so state transitions are smooth rather than requiring ad hoc switches between separate models.
  • The photon-trapping radius marks a genuine SSD-to-slim-disc transition: above a rate around the Eddington value the inner flow is a slim disc while the outer flow remains a thin disc, with the transition radius moving outward as $\dot m$ increases.
  • Below a critical accretion rate $\dot{m}_{\rm c}$ that scales roughly as $\alpha^2$, the ADAF and SSD coexist, supporting the picture in which a thin disc truncates to an inner hot flow either by assumption or by evaporation.
  • The radiation efficiency of the SSD-slim disc branch stays near $0.25$ until photon trapping takes over, then falls; for the ADAF it rises with $\dot m$ roughly as $L\propto\dot m^2$.
  • The model predicts a spectral plateau: as the accretion rate grows, the multi-colour blackbody peak is cut down by trapping, which can be compared with observed super-Eddington spectra.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct testable extension: the transition radius between SSD and slim disc should scale with accretion rate and viscosity parameter; mapping it in a well-measured super-Eddington source would separate the trapping radius from disc-wind effects.
  • The comparison the authors make only for $\alpha=0.1$ and $\beta=0.5$ could be pushed to a grid in $\alpha$ and magnetization; since the critical rates vary as $\alpha^2$, the unification predicts that state-transition luminosities in X-ray binaries should correlate with the viscous parameter.
  • If direct viscous heating of electrons is included in the ADAF branch at very low rates, the luminosity scaling would change from $\dot m^2$ to $\dot m$; quiescent black-hole X-ray binaries offer a clean laboratory to check which scaling holds.
  • The effectively optically thin solution the paper flags for moderate rates between SSD and slim disc may fill a previously ignored observational window; its spectrum and stability are promised future work, but it could already explain soft intermediate accretion states.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents an algebraic, vertically averaged model of steady, axisymmetric accretion flows around a black hole. The authors generalize the standard equations by including two-temperature ions and electrons, a radiation-pressure formula valid for both optically thin and optically thick regimes, magnetic pressure via a β parameter, and an advected-energy fraction f together with a generalized adiabatic exponent Γ3. Using a self-similar ansatz for the velocities and sound speed, they solve iteratively for f, Γ3, T_i, and T_e at a given radius and accretion rate. The resulting solution is shown to reproduce the ADAF, SLE, standard thin disc, and slim disc branches in the f–ṁ and ṁ–Σ planes, to yield a radial SSD-to-slim disc transition when photon trapping becomes important, and to produce luminosities, radiation efficiencies, and spectra for a 10 M☉ black hole with α = 0.1 and β = 0.5.

Significance. The main strength of the paper is that a single set of equations yields four known accretion solutions without tuning the advection fraction; the S-curve emerges from the solution rather than being imposed, and the SSD and slim disc branches are benchmarked against Frank et al. (2002) and Wang & Zhou (1999) with good agreement. The hybrid SSD-slim disc radial structure at super-Eddington rates is a useful and falsifiable prediction. If the electron energy equation is valid over the full claimed range, the result is a valuable unified framework for interpreting accretion state transitions. The derivation is openly presented and the iteration scheme is described in enough detail to be reproduced, although the code itself is not deposited.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (17); Figures 1 and 6] The electron energy balance q_ie = q_rad (Eq. 8, second line of Eq. 15) neglects electron advection, compression work, and direct viscous heating. The paper's own estimates in Eq. (17) show that q_int,e/q_rad and q_c,e/q_rad scale as (p_e/(β p)) f/(1−f), while δ q_vis/q_rad ~ (m_e/m_p)/(1−f); for an ADAF at low ṁ, f → 1 and these ratios are not guaranteed to be small. The authors state in Section 4 that q_ie = q_rad is a good approximation only for ṁ >~ 0.1α² ≈ 10⁻³, yet Figure 1 plots the ADAF branch down to ṁ = 10⁻⁴ and Section 3.4 together with Figure 6 quote L_ADAF ∝ ṁ² over the ADAF range; the ADAF spectrum in Figure 8 is shown at ṁ = 10⁻³, at the stated validity boundary. Because q_ie = q_rad also determines T_e, which enters p_r and Γ3 through Eqs. (6) and (7), the low-rate ADAF branch is not fully determined by the equations as solved. The authors should either restrict the ADAF unification claims to ṁ >~ 10⁻³ and flag L_ADAF ∝ ṁ² as conditional, or include the neglected electron heating terms and quantify how Figures 1, 6, and 8 change.
  2. [Section 3.3 and Appendix B] The radial hybrid SSD-slim disc structure is obtained by applying the self-similar solution pointwise in radius, with the radial derivatives in Eqs. (B1)-(B3) replaced by power-law indices. Appendix B gives a plausibility argument that the deviation from the true power-law indices is 'not so large', but it provides no quantitative error bound and no comparison with a global solution of Eqs. (1)-(9). Since the smoothness of the SSD-slim disc transition in Figure 5 is one of the central claims, the authors should quantify the self-similar approximation error in the transition region, for example by integrating the full radial ODE system at one representative super-Eddington accretion rate.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (17)] The symbols q_int,e and q_c,e used in Eq. (17) are not defined in the main text; they should be defined as the electron advection and pressure-work rates corresponding to q_int and q_c.
  2. [Section 2.3] The 'ergodic-bisection method' is described only verbally; a short pseudocode or flow chart would substantially improve reproducibility.
  3. [Figure 1] The legend uses 'Slim disk' while the text uses 'slim disc'; the spelling should be unified.
  4. [Section 3.4] The ADAF luminosity is computed with the outer boundary at 5000 R_S, but the sensitivity of L_ADAF to this choice is not discussed.
  5. [Section 3.5] The Monte Carlo spectrum calculation for the ADAF is not described in detail (geometry, number of photons, seed, or a public code); the authors should state these assumptions.
  6. [Section 4, Eq. (16)] The pseudo-Newtonian potential is tested only for the Schwarzschild case; the sentence in the text about the Kerr case reports higher inner-zone luminosity and temperature without a corresponding figure or table.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the generalized equations are solved for f and Γ3, and the reproduced branches are cross-checked against independent external solutions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that its generalized height-averaged equations, solved with a self-similar ansatz and an iterative determination of the advection fraction f and generalized adiabatic index Γ3, reproduce the ADAF, SLE, SSD, and slim disc branches. No step in this chain reduces to its own input. The advection fraction f is defined as q_int/(q_c+q_vis) (Eq. 13) and is then solved from the energy equations (Eqs. 11 and 15), not fitted to the target branches. The four solution branches emerge from the same system of equations, and the authors verify them against external benchmarks: the S-curve is compared with Frank et al. (2002) and Wang & Zhou (1999), and the ADAF radial structure is compared with Narayan & Yi (1994, 1995b). These are independent checks, not re-statements of the model's definitions. The self-similar form is adopted explicitly from Narayan & Yi (1994, 1995b), and the generalized radiation pressure and flux expressions (Eqs. 6 and 9) are standard constructions whose limiting forms are stated, so no ansatz is smuggled through a citation. The main physical limitation — the electron energy balance q_ie = q_rad, with Eq. (17) showing that the neglected terms can become important for mdot less than about 1e-3 — is a validity or correctness concern for the low-accretion-rate ADAF branch, not a circularity: the authors explicitly note that including direct viscous heating would change L_ADAF from mdot^2 to mdot. No self-citation is load-bearing; references to the authors' earlier works (e.g., Liu et al. 1999; Qiao & Liu 2012) are contextual or supporting, not used to deduce the central result. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks, so no circularity score above zero is warranted.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on a series of standard and domain-specific modeling assumptions, chiefly the self-similar ansatz, the height-averaged vertical structure, the interpolated Eddington radiative transfer, and the electron energy balance. No new physical entities are introduced. The parameters alpha, beta, ln Lambda, and outer radius are chosen by hand rather than fitted; the model is not calibrated to observations.

free parameters (4)
  • alpha (viscosity parameter) = 0.1
    Chosen as a typical value for the numerical solutions; the phase structure likely changes with alpha (e.g., mdot_c ~ alpha^2), but no fitting to observations is performed.
  • beta (magnetic pressure fraction) = 0.5
    Assumes equipartition between gas and magnetic pressure (p_m = p_g). This is an ad hoc modeling choice, representative of magnetized accretion flows; no observational fit.
  • Coulomb logarithm ln Lambda = 20
    Standard fixed value in the ion-electron energy exchange rate, Eq. (A1).
  • Outer radius for luminosity/spectra = 5000 R_S
    Integration limit chosen for the luminosity and spectral calculations in Sections 3.4 and 3.5; different outer radii will change the integrated quantities.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Self-similar power-law forms for radial velocity, angular velocity, and sound speed (Eq. 12).
    The generalized equations are reduced to algebraic relations by assuming self-similarity; Appendix B argues that radial derivatives are close to power-law indices, but deviations are not quantified for all regimes.
  • domain assumption Vertical hydrostatic equilibrium with scale height factor 2/5 (Eq. 4).
    Adopted from Narayan & Yi (1995a) to accommodate geometrically thick flows; the paper states it does not affect thin solutions but is an approximation for thick branches.
  • domain assumption Generalized Eddington two-stream radiative transfer flux F_rad = 4 sigma T_e^4 (3 tau/2 + sqrt(3) + 1/tau_abs)^-1 (Eq. 9).
    Interpolates between optically thin and thick limits; derived from Hubeny (1990). The absorption opacity is set through Kirchhoff's law with bremsstrahlung and synchrotron plus their Comptonized parts.
  • domain assumption Electron energy balance q_ie = q_rad (Eq. 8), neglecting electron advection, compression work, and direct viscous heating.
    Load-bearing for the ADAF and SLE branches; Section 4 estimates these neglected terms are small for mdot >~ 10^-3, but at lower rates direct viscous heating can alter L_ADAF proportionality.
  • domain assumption Generalized radiation pressure p_r = F_rad/(2c)(tau + 2/sqrt(3)) (Eq. 6).
    Interpolates radiation pressure between optically thin and thick regimes; recovers a T^4/3 in the diffusive limit. Standard in prior unified models.
  • domain assumption Ideal gas equation of state with tangled magnetic field pressure p_m = (1-beta)/beta p_g and internal energy including 3p_m and 3p_r (Eqs. 6-7).
    Standard treatment for magnetized two-temperature accretion flows, following Esin (1997) and Narayan et al. (1998a).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A generalized solution for advection-dominated accretion flow, standard disc, and slim disc." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/POK7N527

@misc{pith2026250503583,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A generalized solution for advection-dominated accretion flow, standard disc, and slim disc},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/POK7N527}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03583}
}
abstract

Aiming at a general description of four basic solutions describing the accretion processes, i.e., the Shakura-Sunyaev thin disc (SSD), the Shapiro-Lightman-Eardley solution (SLE), the slim disc, and the advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF), we present generalized axisymmetric height-averaged equations, where the entropy advection, the radiation pressure, and photon trapping effect are all included self-consistently. Our generalized solution can reproduce the ADAF, SLE, SSD, and slim disc branches in a wide range of accretion rates from sub- to super-Eddington accretion. An S-curve in the $\dot{m}-\Sigma$ plane is also reproduced, representing the SSD branch, the radiation-pressure-dominant branch, and the slim disc branch. The solution gives a natural transition between SSD and slim disc when photon trapping occurs in the accretion flow, producing a radially hybrid SSD-slim disc structure in a certain range of accretion rates. The coexistence of ADAF and SSD below a critical accretion rate is clearly shown with distinct advection fraction of accretion energy. We also present the luminosity, radiation efficiency, and spectrum from the generalized solutions for a large range of accretion rates in stellar mass black holes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.03583 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. All possible solutions obtained from the generalized equations. The left, middle, and right panels display respectively the advection fraction of energy, the ion and electron temperatures, and the scale height varying with the accretion rates from sub- to super-Eddington accretion rates for 𝑚 = 10, 𝛼 = 0.1, and 𝑝m = 𝑝g. The upper panels are for 𝑅 = 10𝑅S and the lower panels are for 𝑅 = 1000𝑅S. of energy advection. T… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The thermal equilibrium curves of the generalized solutions composed of ADAF, SLE, SSD, and slim disc for 𝑚 = 10, 𝛼 = 0.1, and 𝑝m = 𝑝g at 10 𝑅S (the left panel), 103 𝑅S (the middle panel), and 105 𝑅S (the right panel). For comparison, the thermal equilibrium curves from the SSD equations (Frank et al. 2002, FKR02) and the self-similar solution of slim disc (Wang & Zhou 1999, WZ99) are also plotted by black dashed li… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The radial profiles of the advection fraction of energy, electron temperatures, and surface density of the ADAF (red solid lines) and SSD (black solid lines) in generalized solution for 𝑚 = 10, 𝛼 = 0.1, and 𝑝m = 𝑝g, at 0.001 𝑀¤ Edd. For comparison, the SSD solutions of Frank et al. (2002, FKR02) are plotted in black dashed line. 10 1 10 2 10 3 R / RS 10 3 10 2 10 1 m c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The critical accretion rate for existence of hot flows as a function of radius for 𝑚 = 10, 𝛼 = 0.1, and 𝑝m = 𝑝g. profile. Here we also display the distribution of the upper limit of the accretion rate for the existence of hot flows, 𝑚¤ c. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The radial profiles (red solid lines) of electron temperatures, effective temperature, and surface density of the generalized solution for 𝑚 = 10, 𝛼 = 0.1, and 𝑝m = 𝑝g, at 0.1 𝑀¤ Edd (the upper panel) and 10 𝑀¤ Edd (the lower panel). For comparison, the SSD solutions o…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The variation of the bolometric luminosities as a function of the mass accretion rates of SSD-slim disc and the ADAF for 𝑚 = 10, 𝛼 = 0.1, and 𝑝m = 𝑝g. the accretion rate until 𝑚¤ c at the ISCO is reached. The luminosity of ADAF qualitatively has the trend 𝐿ADAF ∝ ¤𝑚 2 …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The variation of the radiation efficiency as a function of the mass accretion rates of SSD-slim disc and the ADAF for 𝑚 = 10, 𝛼 = 0.1, and 𝑝m = 𝑝g. The radiation efficiency of SSD without zero torque condition at inner boundary is also marked by horizontal grey dotted …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The radial profiles of electron temperature in Newtonian case (dashed line) and pseudo-Newtonian case (solid line) of the generalized so￾lution for 10 𝑀⊙ Schwarzschild black hole, 𝛼 = 0.1, and 𝑝m = 𝑝g, at 0.1 𝑀¤ Edd. compression work, and direct heat rate for electrons…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. First detection of ultra-fast outflows in a quiescent galaxy

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    First detection of an ultra-fast outflow (v≈0.07c) in a quiescent galaxy quenched ~9 Gyr ago, suggesting AGN winds can maintain quiescence independent of global star formation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    @urlcharsother \@makeother \ & \# \^ \_ \ @doi @urlcharsother \@ifnextchar [ @doi@ @doi@[] @doi@[#1]#2 \@tempa #1 \@tempa\@empty http://dx.doi.org/#2 doi:#2 http://dx.doi.org/#2 #1 @eprint#1#2 @eprint@#1:#2::\@nil @eprint@arXiv#1 http://arxiv.org/abs/#1 arXiv:#1 @eprint@dblp#1 http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/#1.xml dblp:#1 @eprint@#1:#2:#3:#4\@nil \@t...

  2. [2]

    A., Czerny B., Lasota J

    Abramowicz M. A., Czerny B., Lasota J. P., Szuszkiewicz E., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/166683 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...332..646A 332, 646

    doi:10.1086/166683 1988

  3. [3]

    A., Chen X., Kato S., Lasota J.-P., Regev O., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187709 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...438L..37A 438, L37

    Abramowicz M. A., Chen X., Kato S., Lasota J.-P., Regev O., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187709 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...438L..37A 438, L37

    doi:10.1086/187709 1995

  4. [4]

    A., Chen X

    Abramowicz M. A., Chen X. M., Granath M., Lasota J. P., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/178004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...471..762A 471, 762

    doi:10.1086/178004 1996

  5. [5]

    V., Bjoernsson G., Novikov I

    Artemova I. V., Bjoernsson G., Novikov I. D., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177084 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...461..565A 461, 565

    doi:10.1086/177084 1996

  6. [6]

    V., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G

    Artemova I. V., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., Igumenshchev I. V., Novikov I. D., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/319432 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...549.1050A 549, 1050

    work page doi:10.1086/319432 2001

  7. [7]

    V., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G

    Artemova Y. V., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., Igumenshchev I. V., Novikov I. D., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/496964 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...637..968A 637, 968

    doi:10.1086/496964 2006

  8. [8]

    d., 1940, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/100.7.500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1940MNRAS.100..500A 100, 500

    Atkinson R. d., 1940, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/100.7.500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1940MNRAS.100..500A 100, 500

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/100.7.500 1940

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    C., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/184.1.53 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978MNRAS.184...53B 184, 53

    Begelman M. C., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/184.1.53 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978MNRAS.184...53B 184, 53

    1978 doi

  2. [10]

    C., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/187.2.237 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979MNRAS.187..237B 187, 237

    Begelman M. C., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/187.2.237 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979MNRAS.187..237B 187, 237

    1979 doi

  3. [11]

    C., Meier D

    Begelman M. C., Meier D. L., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159688 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...253..873B 253, 873

    1982 doi

  4. [13]

    N., Fink H., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9504093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...305...53B 305, 53

    Boller T., Brandt W. N., Fink H., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9504093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...305...53B 305, 53

    1996 doi arXiv

  5. [14]

    Bondi H., 1952, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/112.2.195 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1952MNRAS.112..195B 112, 195

    1952 doi

  6. [15]

    Bondi H., Hoyle F., 1944, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/104.5.273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1944MNRAS.104..273B 104, 273

    1944 doi

  7. [16]

    R., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0022-4073(83)90102-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983JQSRT..30..395B 30, 395

    Buchler J. R., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0022-4073(83)90102-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983JQSRT..30..395B 30, 395

    1983 doi

  8. [17]

    New York: Dover

    Chandrasekhar S., 1967, An introduction to the study of stellar structure . New York: Dover

    1967

  9. [18]

    E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172916 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...412..254C 412, 254

    Chen X., Taam R. E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172916 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...412..254C 412, 254

    1993 doi

  10. [19]

    Chen L.-H., Wang J.-M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423416 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...614..101C 614, 101

    2004 doi

  11. [20]

    A., Lasota J.-P., Narayan R., Yi I., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187836 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...443L..61C 443, L61

    Chen X., Abramowicz M. A., Lasota J.-P., Narayan R., Yi I., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187836 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...443L..61C 443, L61

    1995 doi

  12. [21]

    D., 1983, Principles of stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis

    Clayton D. D., 1983, Principles of stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis . Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    1983

  13. [22]

    Czerny B., Elvis M., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/165630 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...321..305C 321, 305

    1987 doi

  14. [23]

    C., Roth N., Ramirez-Ruiz E., Miller M

    Dai L., McKinney J. C., Roth N., Ramirez-Ruiz E., Miller M. C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aab429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859L..20D 859, L20

    2018 doi

  15. [24]

    D., Liang E

    Dermer C. D., Liang E. P., Canfield E., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/169770 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...369..410D 369, 410

    1991 doi

  16. [25]

    Elvis M., et al., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJS...95....1E 95, 1

    1994 doi

  17. [26]

    A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/304129 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...482..400E 482, 400

    Esin A. A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/304129 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...482..400E 482, 400

    1997 doi

  18. [27]

    A., Narayan R., Ostriker E., Yi I., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177421 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...465..312E 465, 312

    Esin A. A., Narayan R., Ostriker E., Yi I., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177421 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...465..312E 465, 312

    1996 doi

  19. [28]

    Feng H., Soria R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newar.2011.08.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011NewAR..55..166F 55, 166

    2011 doi

  20. [29]

    J., 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition

    Frank J., King A., Raine D. J., 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    2002

  21. [30]

    arXiv:1307.3635

    Ghosh H., 2013, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.1307.3635 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013arXiv1307.3635G p. arXiv:1307.3635

    2013 doi arXiv

  22. [31]

    Honma F., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/48.1.77 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996PASJ...48...77H 48, 77

    1996 doi

  23. [32]

    Honma F., Matsumoto R., Kato S., 1991a, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991PASJ...43..147H 43, 147

  24. [33]

    A., 1991b, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991PASJ...43..261H 43, 261

    Honma F., Matsumoto R., Kato S., Abramowicz M. A., 1991b, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991PASJ...43..261H 43, 261

  25. [34]

    Huang J., Feng H., Gu W.-M., Wu W.-B., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ace71e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954..150H 954, 150

    2023 doi

  26. [35]

    Hubeny I., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/168501 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...351..632H 351, 632

    1990 doi

  27. [36]

    Ichimaru S., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155314 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...214..840I 214, 840

    1977 doi

  28. [37]

    Jiao C.-L., Wu X.-B., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/112 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...733..112J 733, 112

    2011 doi

  29. [38]

    Jin C., Ward M., Done C., Gelbord J., 2012a, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19805.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420.1825J 420, 1825

    2011

  30. [40]

    Jin C., Ward M., Done C., 2012c, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21272.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.425..907J 425, 907

    2012

  31. [41]

    P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARA&A..55..303K 55, 303

    Kaaret P., Feng H., Roberts T. P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARA&A..55..303K 55, 303

    2017 doi

  32. [42]

    Kyoto: Kyoto University Press

    Kato S., Fukue J., Mineshige S., 2008, Black-Hole Accretion Disks --- Towards a New Paradigm --- . Kyoto: Kyoto University Press

    2008

  33. [43]

    I., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155355 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...215..265K 215, 265

    Katz J. I., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155355 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...215..265K 215, 265

    1977 doi

  34. [44]

    Komossa S., Bade N., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9901141 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...343..775K 343, 775

    1999 doi arXiv

  35. [45]

    S., 1957, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1957JETP....4..730K 4, 730

    Kompaneets A. S., 1957, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1957JETP....4..730K 4, 730

    1957

  36. [46]

    Kubota A., Done C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2140 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489..524K 489, 524

    2019 doi

  37. [47]

    Li J., Qiao E., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad736 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.3237L 521, 3237

    2023 doi

  38. [48]

    Li D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab744a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...891..121L 891, 121

    2020 doi

  39. [49]

    P., Wandel A., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170321 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...376..746L 376, 746

    Liang E. P., Wandel A., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170321 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...376..746L 376, 746

    1991 doi

  40. [50]

    F., Yuan W., Meyer F., Meyer-Hofmeister E., Xie G

    Liu B. F., Yuan W., Meyer F., Meyer-Hofmeister E., Xie G. Z., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312383 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...527L..17L 527, L17

    1999 doi

  41. [51]

    P., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/266.2.386 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994MNRAS.266..386L 266, 386

    Luo C., Liang E. P., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/266.2.386 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994MNRAS.266..386L 266, 386

    1994 doi

  42. [52]

    E., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/168.3.603 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974MNRAS.168..603L 168, 603

    Lynden-Bell D., Pringle J. E., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/168.3.603 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974MNRAS.168..603L 168, 603

    1974 doi

  43. [53]

    Mahadevan R., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/303727 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...477..585M 477, 585

    1997 doi

  44. [54]

    A., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..582M 268, 582

    Malkan M. A., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..582M 268, 582

    1983 doi

  45. [55]

    A., Sargent W

    Malkan M. A., Sargent W. L. W., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159701 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...254...22M 254, 22

    1982 doi

  46. [56]

    Manmoto T., Kato S., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...538..295M 538, 295

    2000 doi

  47. [57]

    Manmoto T., Mineshige S., Kusunose M., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/304817 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...489..791M 489, 791

    1997 doi

  48. [58]

    Meyer F., Meyer-Hofmeister E., 1994, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994A&A...288..175M 288, 175

    1994

  49. [59]

    F., Meyer-Hofmeister E., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0007091 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...361..175M 361, 175

    Meyer F., Liu B. F., Meyer-Hofmeister E., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0007091 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...361..175M 361, 175

    2000 doi arXiv

  50. [60]

    W., 1984, Foundations of radiation hydrodynamics

    Mihalas D., Mihalas B. W., 1984, Foundations of radiation hydrodynamics . New York: Oxford University Press

    1984

  51. [61]

    Mineshige S., Kawaguchi T., Takeuchi M., Hayashida K., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/52.3.499 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000PASJ...52..499M 52, 499

    2000 doi

  52. [62]

    Narayan R., Yi I., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...428L..13N 428, L13

    1994 doi

  53. [63]

    Narayan R., Yi I., 1995a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/175599 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...444..231N 444, 231

    doi

  54. [64]

    Narayan R., Yi I., 1995b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176343 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...452..710N 452, 710

    doi

  55. [65]

    Narayan R., Kato S., Honma F., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/303591 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...476...49N 476, 49

    1997 doi

  56. [66]

    A., Bj \"o rnsson G., Pringle J

    Narayan R., Mahadevan R., Quataert E., 1998a, in Abramowicz M. A., Bj \"o rnsson G., Pringle J. E., eds, Theory of Black Hole Accretion Disks. pp 148--182 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/9803141 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9803141

    doi arXiv

  57. [67]

    E., Popham R

    Narayan R., Mahadevan R., Grindlay J. E., Popham R. G., Gammie C., 1998b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...492..554N 492, 554

    doi

  58. [68]

    D., Thorne K

    Novikov I. D., Thorne K. S., 1973, in Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus). pp 343--450

    1973

  59. [69]

    E., Matsumoto R., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/16 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...697...16O 697, 16

    Oda H., Machida M., Nakamura K. E., Matsumoto R., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/16 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...697...16O 697, 16

    2009 doi

  60. [70]

    Ohsuga K., Mori M., Nakamoto T., Mineshige S., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430728 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...628..368O 628, 368

    2005 doi

  61. [71]

    P., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/319042 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...549..100P 549, 100

    Park M.-G., Ostriker J. P., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/319042 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...549..100P 549, 100

    2001 doi

  62. [72]

    Piran T., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/156069 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ...221..652P 221, 652

    1978 doi

  63. [73]

    A., Sobol I

    Pozdniakov L. A., Sobol I. M., Siuniaev R. A., 1977, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977AZh....54.1246P 54, 1246

    1977

  64. [74]

    A., Sobol I

    Pozdnyakov L. A., Sobol I. M., Syunyaev R. A., 1983, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ASPRv...2..189P 2, 189

    1983

  65. [75]

    F., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...744..145Q 744, 145

    Qiao E., Liu B. F., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...744..145Q 744, 145

    2012 doi

  66. [76]

    J., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1038/333523a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988Natur.333..523R 333, 523

    Rees M. J., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1038/333523a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988Natur.333..523R 333, 523

    1988 doi

  67. [77]

    J., Begelman M

    Rees M. J., Begelman M. C., Blandford R. D., Phinney E. S., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1038/295017a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982Natur.295...17R 295, 17

    1982 doi

  68. [78]

    A., McClintock J

    Remillard R. A., McClintock J. E., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ARA&A..44...49R 44, 49

    2006 arXiv

  69. [79]

    B., Lightman A

    Rybicki G. B., Lightman A. P., 1979, Radiative processes in astrophysics . Wiley

    1979

  70. [80]

    I., Sunyaev R

    Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A&A....24..337S 24, 337

    1973

  71. [81]

    L., Lightman A

    Shapiro S. L., Lightman A. P., Eardley D. M., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/154162 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...204..187S 204, 187

    1976 doi

  72. [82]

    Shimura T., Manmoto T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06158.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.338.1013S 338, 1013

    2003

  73. [83]

    W., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/204.4.1269 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983MNRAS.204.1269S 204, 1269

    Stepney S., Guilbert P. W., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/204.4.1269 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983MNRAS.204.1269S 204, 1269

    1983 doi

  74. [84]

    Svensson R., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160082 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...258..335S 258, 335

    1982 doi

  75. [85]

    C., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/287.1.165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.287..165S 287, 165

    Szuszkiewicz E., Miller J. C., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/287.1.165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.287..165S 287, 165

    1997 doi

  76. [86]

    C., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01668.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.298..888S 298, 888

    Szuszkiewicz E., Miller J. C., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01668.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.298..888S 298, 888

    1998

  77. [88]

    P., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170564 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...380...84W 380, 84

    Wandel A., Liang E. P., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170564 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...380...84W 380, 84

    1991 doi

  78. [89]

    Wang J.-M., Zhou Y.-Y., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307080 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...516..420W 516, 420

    1999 doi

  79. [90]

    Watarai K.-y., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505854 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...648..523W 648, 523

    2006 doi

  80. [91]

    Watarai K.-y., Fukue J., Takeuchi M., Mineshige S., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/52.1.133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000PASJ...52..133W 52, 133

    2000 doi

  81. [92]

    Yuan F., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04258.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.324..119Y 324, 119

    2001

  82. [93]

    Yuan F., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378666 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...594L..99Y 594, L99

    2003 doi

  83. [94]

    Yuan F., Narayan R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA&A..52..529Y 52, 529

    2014 doi

  84. [95]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.