Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Highly squeezed nanophotonic quantum microcombs with broadband frequency tunability

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A seeded silicon nitride microresonator running below threshold generates directly detected two-mode squeezing of 5.6 dB and maps a 16-qumode comb spanning 11 THz.

desk verdict Solid 5.6 dB squeezing with an honest but over-sold 16-qumode comb claim built from sequential single-pair measurements. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03734 v1 pith:O2Z62B7K submitted 2025-05-06 physics.optics quant-ph

Yichen Shen , Ping-Yen Hsieh , Dhruv Srinivasan , Antoine Henry , Gregory Moille , Sashank Kaushik Sridhar , Alessandro Restelli , You-Chia Chang
show 3 more authors
Kartik Srinivasan Thomas A. Smith Avik Dutt
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsquant-ph
keywords squeezedlightnanophotonicmicroresonatoropticalparametricamplificationquantumfrequencycombfour-wavemixingcontinuous-variableinformationsiliconnitrideseed-assisteddetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a weak seed laser can turn a below-threshold Kerr microresonator into a bright, frequency-multiplexed source of squeezed light. The central result is directly detected two-mode squeezing of 5.6 dB $\pm$ 0.2 dB, which the authors report as surpassing previous continuous-wave and pulsed nanophotonic squeezers. By seeding one mode pair at a time, the same device yields eight squeezed pairs—16 quantum modes (qumodes)—whose two furthest members are separated by about 11 THz. The seed-assisted approach also allows one squeezed pair to be tuned continuously across a full free spectral range, and two pairs to be squeezed simultaneously. This gives a path to compact, chip-integrated quantum sensors and continuous-variable information processors that do not need a phase-coherent local oscillator.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is seed-assisted four-wave-mixing optical parametric amplification in a below-threshold microring. A weak tunable seed at a chosen resonance stimulates regenerative gain for that signal–idler pair, making the pair bright while the pump stays below the oscillation threshold; in phase space each seeded pair is a displaced two-mode squeezed state along the difference quadrature $x_m - x_{-m}$. The expected squeezing in this cavity OPA is set by $S = 1 - \eta_c \eta_{\mathrm{path}} \eta_D$, where $\eta_c$ is the resonator overcoupling, $\eta_{\mathrm{path}}$ the collection path efficiency, and $\eta_D$ the detector efficiency; with $\eta_c \approx 93\%$, $\eta_{\mathrm{path}} \approx 84\%$, and $\eta_D \approx 99\%$, the measured 5.6 dB is consistent with about 9 dB of on-chip squeezing degraded by loss. A mean-field cavity model of the Kerr comb is used to simulate the multiplexed OPA modes and to select which pair a given seed excites.

What would settle it

Seed all eight pairs at once and monitor per-pair intensity-difference noise: if the individually observed squeezing levels collapse, or if strong cross-pair correlations appear, then the sequentially constructed 16-qumode comb is not a simultaneously operating quantum frequency comb.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors' central discovery is that seeding a single optical parametric amplifier mode in a strongly overcoupled silicon nitride microresonator converts what would otherwise be a vacuum-squeezed signal–idler pair into a bright, displaced two-mode squeezed state. That brightness lets the quantum correlations be read out directly as intensity-difference noise on a balanced photodetector, avoiding the phase-coherent local oscillator normally required for nanophotonic squeezing. They measure $5.6\ \mathrm{dB}\pm 0.2\ \mathrm{dB}$ of squeezing in the strongest pair and, by stepping the seed across eight resonant pairs, construct a quantum frequency comb of 16 qumodes with the outermost pair separated by 11 THz. The same seeded OPA, with a thermo-optic feedback loop, tunes one squeezed pair continuously over one free spectral range, and two simultaneous seeds produce two simultaneously squeezed pairs.

Load-bearing premise

The 16-qumode comb is built from measurements taken one mode pair at a time; the claim that it is a quantum frequency comb assumes these sequentially probed pairs behave identically when all pairs are excited simultaneously.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A compact chip can now generate and directly detect squeezing at a level beyond earlier nanophotonic devices, so quantum-enhanced sensing below the shot-noise limit becomes available on a foundry-compatible platform.
  • Because the seed selects the mode pair, frequency-multiplexed qumodes can be addressed individually without an external local oscillator, simplifying continuous-variable encoding and readout.
  • The 16 qumodes spread over 11 THz offer many parallel squeezed channels, and tuning a pair across one free spectral range fills the gaps between comb lines, enabling gapless spectral coverage.
  • Simultaneous two-pair seeding shows that the scheme extends beyond single pairs, supporting the scaling argument toward larger frequency-multiplexed squeezed combs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sequentially assembled comb behaves as the tensor product of independent two-mode squeezed states, then seeding all eight pairs at once should yield 16 simultaneously squeezed modes; the paper's two-pair multiseed result is suggestive but does not prove full simultaneity.
  • The stated loss budget implies that pushing idler overcoupling toward unity and raising path efficiency could recover most of the on-chip squeezing, potentially moving nanophotonic squeezing from the measured 5.6 dB toward the roughly 9 dB generated before loss.
  • The same seed-assisted direct-detection approach may transfer to other integrated nonlinear platforms where homodyne local oscillators are hard to build, though the paper only demonstrates it in silicon nitride.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a seed-assisted optical parametric amplifier in a Si3N4 microring, operating below the oscillation threshold, to generate bright twin beams whose intensity-difference noise is squeezed. The main experimental results are: (i) 5.6 dB ± 0.2 dB of directly detected squeezing at the ±7th mode, consistent with a loss-budget calculation using independently measured coupling, path, and detector efficiencies; (ii) a 'quantum frequency comb' assembled by sequentially seeding eight mode pairs, with squeezing between 3.5 and 5.1 dB and the outermost pair separated by 11 THz; (iii) continuous and coarse tuning of a squeezed pair across one FSR; and (iv) a two-seed experiment showing simultaneous squeezing of two mode pairs. The paper claims this establishes a scalable path to chip-scale multimode quantum sources.

Significance. The single-pair 5.6 dB squeezing result, if correct, is a state-of-the-art result for nanophotonic squeezers and is supported by an independent loss budget and raw time traces showing noise below shot noise with dark-noise subtraction. The seed-assisted detection scheme is a useful alternative to homodyne detection for microresonator OPAs, and the FSR-spanning tuning is an important technical contribution. However, the '16-qumode quantum frequency comb' claim rests on sequential single-pair measurements plus a two-pair simultaneous experiment; the extrapolation to simultaneous many-mode operation is not demonstrated and is the main gap between the title/abstract and the data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Bright Squeezed Quantum Frequency Comb] The 16-qumode comb is not measured in simultaneous operation. The paper explicitly states that the comb spectrum is obtained by superimposing spectra from sequentially seeding individual modes (Section 'Bright Squeezed Quantum Frequency Comb'), and Fig. 3B–C reports one pair at a time. The only simultaneous multi-seed experiment, Fig. 5, uses two seeds, not eight. Since the abstract and title present a 16-qumode quantum frequency comb as a demonstrated resource, this is a load-bearing extrapolation. The authors should either provide a simultaneous multi-pair measurement, with at least several well-separated pairs and per-pair verification, or explicitly qualify the claim as a sequential characterization of parametric gain and per-pair squeezing.
  2. [Multiseeded Squeezing] Fig. 5: the two-seed measurement combines the two signal beams on one photodetector port and the two idler beams on the other. This measurement certifies that the summed intensity difference of the two pairs is squeezed, but it does not by itself prove that each pair is independently squeezed or that no cross-pair correlations are present. The sentence 'These results confirm that our seed-assisted OPA technique can be expanded to measure simultaneous bright squeezing of multiple independent mode pairs' overstates what the combined-port measurement demonstrates; a full characterization would require simultaneous but separate detection of each pair or a measured covariance matrix.
  3. [Bright Squeezed Quantum Frequency Comb] The tensor-product state |comb⟩ ∝ ⊗_m [...] is introduced as though supported by the data, but the text only calls it a 'hint.' The independence of different mode pairs under simultaneous seeding is not established, and the LLE simulation in Section 'Seed-Assisted Parametric Amplification for Squeezing' states that seeding one mode suppresses amplification of vacuum fluctuations in other modes, which raises the possibility of gain competition in the multi-seed regime. This should be addressed, either with a model that predicts the observed two-seed result or with a dedicated multi-pair independence test.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Methods, Table I] The entry for 'Measured β2 [fs2/mm]' reads '-297.7 to do' and appears to contain an unfinished placeholder; please complete or remove it.
  2. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption contains the typo 'pairsise'; it should be 'pairwise'.
  3. [Bright Squeezed Quantum Frequency Comb] The phrase 'See Supplementry Materials' should read 'See Supplementary Materials.'
  4. [Seed-Assisted Parametric Amplification for Squeezing] Please define S in the formula 'S = 1−ηcηpathηD' explicitly and show how the predicted squeezing level in dB and its uncertainty are derived; as written, the text is ambiguous about whether S is the normalized noise variance or the squeezing level in dB.
  5. [Seed-Assisted Parametric Amplification for Squeezing] The text says 'generated on-chip squeezing≈9 dB' based on ηc ≈ 93%, but the displayed formula would give roughly 11.5 dB of squeezing for ηc = 0.93; please clarify the efficiency accounting, for example by stating which additional on-chip losses are included.
  6. [Figures 2 and 3] The repeated statement that '0 dB corresponds to 1 mW of power' is confusing for noise traces; please specify whether the vertical axis is in dBm or a renormalized noise-power unit, and clarify the conversion for the shot-noise traces.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main squeezing claim is compared against a standard cavity-OPA formula using independently measured efficiencies, and the QFC claim is explicitly presented as a sequential construction rather than a derived prediction.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim, 5.6 dB ± 0.2 dB of directly detected squeezing, is checked against the standard cavity-OPA expression S = 1 − ηc ηpath ηD, where ηc ≈ 93% is the overcoupling coefficient, ηpath ≈ 84% is the measured detection-path efficiency, and ηD ≈ 99% is the detector quantum efficiency. The paper states that these efficiencies were independently characterized, and no parameter was fitted to the squeezing data itself. The formula is attributed to a mixture of external and prior references (Vahlbruch, Fabre, Chembo, and an earlier Dutt et al. paper), but the core result is a standard textbook cavity-OPA prediction, not a claim whose content is supplied by self-citation. The LLE simulations are used only to model classical parametric gain and mode selection, not to generate the quantum squeezing prediction. The 'quantum frequency comb' of 16 qumodes is admittedly assembled by superimposing spectra obtained from sequential single-pair seeding; the paper explicitly distinguishes this from a simultaneously oscillating Kerr comb and acknowledges the sequential construction. That is an experimental-limitation issue about simultaneous operation, not a circularity of derivation: the per-pair squeezing measurements are real and the multiseed experiment provides partial simultaneous validation. Self-citations such as the authors' prior 3.5 dB squeezing paper are used for context and comparison, not as load-bearing justification for the current result. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the squeezing data; loss values are independently characterized. The model assumptions are standard for cavity OPA squeezing and microresonator comb dynamics, and the interpretation of the noise measurement as quantum squeezing is a standard domain assumption.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Cavity OPA squeezing formula S = 1 − ηc ηpath ηD applies near threshold at low measurement frequency
    Used to predict the 5.6 dB result from measured losses; it is standard input-output theory for a lossy OPA below threshold.
  • domain assumption The Lugiato-Lefever equation describes the classical seeded microcomb gain dynamics
    Used in Figure 2A simulation of multiplexed OPA modes; well-established for Kerr microresonators but a model assumption.
  • domain assumption The intensity-difference noise below shot noise originates from two-mode squeezed quantum correlations rather than classical common-mode noise
    The whole measurement relies on this interpretation; the shot-noise calibration and detector common-mode rejection support it, but raw data are not provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Highly squeezed nanophotonic quantum microcombs with broadband frequency tunability." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O2Z62B7K

@misc{pith2026250503734,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Highly squeezed nanophotonic quantum microcombs with broadband frequency tunability},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O2Z62B7K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03734}
}
abstract

Squeezed light offers genuine quantum advantage in enhanced sensing and quantum computation; yet the level of squeezing or quantum noise reduction generated from nanophotonic chips has been limited. In addition to strong quantum noise reduction, key desiderata for such a nanophotonic squeezer include frequency agility or tunability over a broad frequency range, and simultaneous operation in many distinct, well-defined quantum modes (qumodes). Here we present a strongly overcoupled silicon nitride squeezer based on a below-threshold optical parametric amplifier (OPA) that produces directly detected squeezing of 5.6 dB $\pm$ 0.2 dB, surpassing previous demonstrations in both continuous-wave and pulsed regimes. We introduce a seed-assisted detection technique into such nanophotonic squeezers that reveals a quantum frequency comb (QFC) of 16 qumodes, with a separation of 11~THz between the furthest qumode pair, while maintaining a strong squeezing. Additionally, we report spectral tuning of a qumode comb pair over one free-spectral range of the OPA, thus bridging the spacing between the discrete modes of the QFC. Our results significantly advance both the generation and detection of nanophotonic squeezed light in a broadband and multimode platform, establishing a scalable, chip-integrated path for compact quantum sensors and continuous-variable quantum information processing systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.03734 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. For each pairsise squeezed comb line, (left) a comparison of squeezed noises and shot noises, (right) the corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Heterogeneously Integrated Squeezed-Light Generation and Detection on a Single Photonic Chip

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single silicon-nitride chip now generates, routes, and detects a 34-mode squeezed quantum microcomb with about 3 dB of raw squeezing.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    B. J. Lawrie, P. D. Lett, A. M. Marino, and R. C. Pooser, Quantum sensing with squeezed light, ACS Photonics 6, 1307 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 (2005)

    2005

  3. [3]

    U. L. Andersen, G. Leuchs, and C. Silberhorn, Continuous-variable quantum information processing, Laser & Photonics Reviews 4, 337 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    E. S. Polzik, J. Carri, and H. J. Kimble, Spectroscopy with squeezed light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3020 (1992)

    1992

  5. [5]

    D. I. Herman, M. Walsh, M. K. Kreider, N. Lordi, E. J. Tsao, A. J. Lind, M. Heyrich, J. Combes, J. Genest, and S. A. Diddams, Squeezed dual-comb spectroscopy, Science 387, 653 (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    Fukui, A

    K. Fukui, A. Tomita, A. Okamoto, and K. Fujii, High- threshold fault-tolerant quantum computation with ana- log quantum error correction, Physical review X 8, 021054 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Inoue, T

    A. Inoue, T. Kashiwazaki, T. Yamashima, N. Takanashi, T. Kazama, K. Enbutsu, K. Watanabe, T. Umeki, M. Endo, and A. Furusawa, Toward a multi-core ultra- fast optical quantum processor: 43-ghz bandwidth real- time amplitude measurement of 5-db squeezed light using modularized optical parametric amplifier with 5g tech- nology, Applied Physics Letters 122 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    L.-A. Wu, H. Kimble, J. Hall, and H. Wu, Generation of squeezed states by parametric down conversion, Physical review letters 57, 2520 (1986)

    work page 1986

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Vahlbruch, M

    H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schn- abel, Detection of 15 db squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110801 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Yokoyama, R

    S. Yokoyama, R. Ukai, S. Armstrong, et al. , Ultra-large- scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain, Nature Photonics 7, 982 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Asavanant, Y

    W. Asavanant, Y. Shiozawa, S. Yokoyama, B. Charoen- sombutamon, H. Emura, R. N. Alexander, S. Takeda, 9 TABLE III. Summary of lasers used in the experiment Device name Wavelength [nm] Linewidth (5 µs) [kHz] Piezo-tuning range [GHz] Tunable Laser A 1510 − 1630 ≤10 33 Tunable La...

    2019

  4. [12]

    Roslund, R

    J. Roslund, R. de Ara´ ujo, S. Jiang, et al. , Wavelength- multiplexed quantum networks with ultrafast frequency combs, Nature Photonics 8, 109 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    M. Chen, N. C. Menicucci, and O. Pfister, Experimental realization of multipartite entanglement of 60 modes of a quantum optical frequency comb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120505 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    Reimer, M

    C. Reimer, M. Kues, P. Roztocki, B. Wetzel, F. Grazioso, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, T. Johnston, Y. Bromberg, L. Caspani, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, Generation of multiphoton entangled quantum states by means of integrated frequency combs, Science 351, 1176 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Zhong, H

    H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y. Hu, et al. , Quantum computational advantage using photons, Sci- ence 370, 1460 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    L. S. Madsen, F. Laudenbach, M. F. Askarani, et al. , Quantum computational advantage with a pro- grammable photonic processor, Nature 606, 75 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    J. Aasi, J. Abadie, B. Abbott, et al., Enhanced sensitivity of the ligo gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light, Nature Photonics 7, 613 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    R. B. de Andrade, H. Kerdoncuff, K. Berg-Sørensen, T. Gehring, M. Lassen, and U. L. Andersen, Quantum- enhanced continuous-wave stimulated raman scattering spectroscopy, Optica 7, 470 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    C. A. Casacio, L. S. Madsen, A. Terrasson, et al. , Quantum-enhanced nonlinear microscopy, Nature 594, 201 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Z. Yang, M. Jahanbozorgi, D. Jeong, S. Sun, O. Pfister, H. Lee, and X. Yi, A squeezed quantum microcomb on a chip, Nature Communications 12, 4781 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Jahanbozorgi, Z

    M. Jahanbozorgi, Z. Yang, S. Sun, H. Chen, R. Liu, B. Wang, and X. Yi, Generation of squeezed quantum microcombs with silicon nitride integrated photonic cir- cuits, Optica 10, 1100 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Z. Wang, K. Li, Y. Wang, X. Zhou, Y. Cheng, B. Jing, F. Sun, J. Li, Z. Li, B. Wu, et al. , Large-scale cluster quantum microcombs, Light: Science & Applications 14, 164 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    X. Jia, C. Zhai, X. Zhu, C. You, Y. Cao, X. Zhang, Y. Zheng, Z. Fu, J. Mao, T. Dai, et al. , Continuous- variable multipartite entanglement in an integrated mi- crocomb, Nature 639, 1 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Tritschler, T

    P. Tritschler, T. Ohms, C. Schweikert, O. S¨ ozen, R. H. Klenk, S. Abdani, W. Vogel, G. Rademacher, A. Zim- mermann, and P. Degenfeld-Schonburg, Chip-integrated single-mode coherent-squeezed light source using four- wave mixing in microresonators, arXiv:2502.16278 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Y. Zhao, Y. Okawachi, J. K. Jang, X. Ji, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Near-degenerate quadrature-squeezed vacuum generation on a silicon-nitride chip, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 193601 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    A. E. Ulanov, B. Ruhnke, T. Wildi, and T. Herr, Quadrature squeezing in a nanophotonic microresonator, arXiv:2502.17337 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Zhang, M

    Y. Zhang, M. Menotti, K. Tan, V. D. Vaidya, D. H. Mahler, L. G. Helt, L. Zatti, M. Liscidini, B. Morri- son, and Z. Vernon, Squeezed light from a nanophotonic molecule, Nature Communications 12, 2233 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    V. D. Vaidya, B. Morrison, L. G. Helt, R. Shahrokshahi, D. H. Mahler, M. J. Collins, K. Tan, J. Lavoie, A. Re- pingon, M. Menotti, N. Quesada, R. C. Pooser, A. E. Lita, T. Gerrits, S. W. Nam, and Z. Vernon, Broad- band quadrature-squeezed vacuum and nonclassical pho- ton numbe...

    2020

  21. [29]

    Cernansky and A

    R. Cernansky and A. Politi, Nanophotonic source of quadrature squeezing via self-phase modulation, APL Photonics 5, 101303 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    P.-K. Chen, I. Briggs, S. Hou, and L. Fan, Ultra- broadband quadrature squeezing with thin-film lithium niobate nanophotonics, Opt. Lett. 47, 1506 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Adamou, L

    D. Adamou, L. Hirsch, T. Shields, S. Yoon, A. C. Dada, J. M. Weaver, D. Faccio, M. Peccianti, L. Caspani, and M. Clerici, Quantum-enhanced time-domain spec- troscopy, Science Advances 11, eadt2187 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    F. Li, T. Li, M. O. Scully, and G. S. Agarwal, Quan- tum advantage with seeded squeezed light for absorption measurement, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 044030 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    X. Sun, Y. Wang, L. Tian, S. Shi, Y. Zheng, and K. Peng, Dependence of the squeezing and anti-squeezing factors of bright squeezed light on the seed beam power and pump beam noise, Optics Letters 44, 1789 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    McCormick, V

    C. McCormick, V. Boyer, E. Arimondo, and P. Lett, Strong relative intensity squeezing by four-wave mixing in rubidium vapor, Optics letters 32, 178 (2006)

    2006

  27. [35]

    Y. Zhao, J. K. Jang, X. Ji, Y. Okawachi, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Large regenerative parametric amplification on chip at ultra-low pump powers, Optica10, 819 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Shen, P.-Y

    Y. Shen, P.-Y. Hsieh, S. K. Sridhar, S. Feldman, Y.- C. Chang, T. A. Smith, and A. Dutt, Strong nanopho- tonic quantum squeezing exceeding 3.5 db in a foundry- compatible kerr microresonator, Optica 12, 302 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Nehra, R

    R. Nehra, R. Sekine, L. Ledezma, Q. Guo, R. M. Gray, A. Roy, and A. Marandi, Few-cycle vacuum squeezing in nanophotonics, Science 377, 1333 (2022). 10

    2022

  30. [38]

    Frascella, R

    G. Frascella, R. V. Zakharov, O. V. Tikhonova, and M. V. Chekhova, Multimode optical parametric amplification in the phase-sensitive regime, Optics Letters 46, 2364 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Takanashi, A

    N. Takanashi, A. Inoue, T. Kashiwazaki, T. Kazama, K. Enbutsu, R. Kasahara, T. Umeki, and A. Furusawa, All-optical phase-sensitive detection for ultra-fast quan- tum computation, Opt. Express 28, 34916 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Shaked, Y

    Y. Shaked, Y. Michael, R. Z. Vered, L. Bello, M. Rosen- bluh, and A. Pe’er, Lifting the bandwidth limit of optical homodyne measurement with broadband parametric am- plification, Nature communications 9, 609 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Virally, P

    S. Virally, P. Cusson, and D. V. Seletskiy, Enhanced electro-optic sampling with quantum probes, Physical Review Letters 127, 270504 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    L. A. Lugiato and R. Lefever, Spatial dissipative struc- tures in passive optical systems, Physical review letters 58, 2209 (1987)

    1987

  35. [43]

    Moille, Q

    G. Moille, Q. Li, X. Lu, and K. Srinivasan, pylle: a fast and user friendly lugiato-lefever equation solver, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 124, 1 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    A. Dutt, K. Luke, S. Manipatruni, A. L. Gaeta, P. Nussenzveig, and M. Lipson, On-chip optical squeez- ing, Phys. Rev. Applied 3, 044005 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    Fabre, E

    C. Fabre, E. Giacobino, A. Heidmann, and S. Reynaud, Noise characteristics of a non-degenerate optical para- metric oscillator - application to quantum noise reduc- tion, J. Phys. France 50, 1209 (1989)

    1989

  38. [46]

    Y. K. Chembo, Quantum dynamics of kerr optical fre- quency combs below and above threshold: Spontaneous four-wave mixing, entanglement, and squeezed states of light, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033820 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kon- dratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, Tempo- ral solitons in optical microresonators, Nature Photonics 8, 145 (2014)

    2014

  40. [48]

    T. Herr, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, Dissi- pative kerr solitons in optical microresonators, Nonlinear optical cavity dynamics: from microresonators to fiber lasers , 129 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    Godey, I

    C. Godey, I. V. Balakireva, A. Coillet, and Y. K. Chembo, Stability analysis of the spatiotemporal lugiato- lefever model for kerr optical frequency combs in the anomalous and normal dispersion regimes, Physical Re- view A 89, 063814 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    Q.-F. Yang, Y. Hu, V. Torres-Company, and K. Vahala, Efficient microresonator frequency combs, ELight 4, 18 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    M. Kues, C. Reimer, J. M. Lukens, W. J. Munro, A. M. Weiner, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, Quantum optical microcombs, Nature Photonics 13, 170 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    Zhu, C.-H

    X. Zhu, C.-H. Chang, C. Gonz´ alez-Arciniegas, A. Pe’er, J. Higgins, and O. Pfister, Hypercubic cluster states in the phase-modulated quantum optical frequency comb, Optica 8, 281 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    H.-H. Lu, A. M. Weiner, P. Lougovski, and J. M. Lukens, Quantum information processing with frequency-comb qudits, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 31, 1858 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    J. A. Jaramillo-Villegas, P. Imany, O. D. Odele, D. E. Leaird, Z.-Y. Ou, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, Persistent energy–time entanglement covering multiple resonances of an on-chip biphoton frequency comb, Optica 4, 655 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Lustig, M

    E. Lustig, M. A. Guidry, D. M. Lukin, S. Fan, and J. Vuckovic, Quadrature-dependent lattice dy- namics of dissipative microcombs, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2407.13049 (2024), arXiv:2407.13049 [physics.optics]

    2024 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    X. Ji, F. A. S. Barbosa, S. P. Roberts, A. Dutt, J. Carde- nas, Y. Okawachi, A. Bryant, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lip- son, Ultra-low-loss on-chip resonators with sub-milliwatt parametric oscillation threshold, Optica 4, 619 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    M. W. Puckett, K. Liu, N. Chauhan, Q. Zhao, N. Jin, H. Cheng, J. Wu, R. O. Behunin, P. T. Rakich, K. D. Nel- son, et al., 422 million intrinsic quality factor planar inte- grated all-waveguide resonator with sub-mhz linewidth, Nature communications 12, 934 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    Samantaray, I

    N. Samantaray, I. Ruo-Berchera, A. Meda, et al. , Real- ization of the first sub-shot-noise wide field microscope, Light: Science & Applications 6, e17005 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    R. C. Pooser and B. Lawrie, Ultrasensitive measure- ment of microcantilever displacement below the shot- noise limit, Optica 2, 393 (2015), publisher: Optica Pub- lishing Group

    2015

  52. [60]

    Acernese, M

    F. Acernese, M. Agathos, L. Aiello, A. Allocca, A. Am- ato, S. Ansoldi, S. Antier, M. Ar` ene, N. Arnaud, S. As- cenzi, et al., Increasing the astrophysical reach of the ad- vanced virgo detector via the application of squeezed vac- uum states of light, Physical review letters...

    2019

  53. [61]

    V. G. Lucivero, R. Jim´ enez-Mart´ ınez, J. Kong, and M. W. Mitchell, Squeezed-light spin noise spectroscopy, Physical Review A 93, 053802 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Wolfgramm, A

    F. Wolfgramm, A. Cere, F. A. Beduini, A. Predojevi´ c, M. Koschorreck, and M. W. Mitchell, Squeezed-light op- tical magnetometry, Physical review letters 105, 053601 (2010)

    2010

  55. [63]

    X. Nie, N. Turk, Y. Li, Z. Liu, and R. Baets, High extinc- tion ratio on-chip pump-rejection filter based on cascaded grating-assisted contra-directional couplers in silicon ni- tride rib waveguides, Opt. Lett. 44, 2310 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    Singh, R

    A. Singh, R. Belansky, and M. Soltani, Ultraflat band- pass, high extinction, and tunable silicon photonic filters, Opt. Express 30, 43787 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    J. Gao, T. C. Tzu, T. Fatema, X. Guo, Q. Yu, G. Navick- aite, M. Zervas, M. Geiselmann, and A. Beling, Hetero- geneous balanced photodetector on silicon nitride with 30 ghz bandwidth and 26 db common mode rejection ra- tio, in Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2023 ...

    2023

  58. [66]

    Costanzo, J

    R. Costanzo, J. Gao, X. Shen, Q. Yu, A. Alabdulwa- hab, A. Beling, and S. M. Bowers, Low-noise balanced photoreceiver with inp-on-si photodiodes and sige bic- mos transimpedance amplifier, J. Lightwave Technol.39, 4837 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    Bruynsteen, M

    C. Bruynsteen, M. Vanhoecke, J. Bauwelinck, and X. Yin, Integrated balanced homodyne photonic– electronic detector for beyond 20 ghz shot-noise-limited measurements, Optica 8, 1146 (2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    Raffaelli, G

    F. Raffaelli, G. Ferranti, D. H. Mahler, P. Sibson, J. E. Kennard, A. Santamato, G. Sinclair, D. Bonneau, M. G. Thompson, and J. C. F. Matthews, A homodyne detector integrated onto a photonic chip for measuring quantum states and generating random numbers, Quantum Sci- ence an...

    2018

  61. [69]

    J. F. Tasker, J. Frazer, G. Ferranti, et al. , Silicon pho- tonics interfaced with integrated electronics for 9 ghz measurement of squeezed light, Nature Photonics 15, 11 (2021)

    2021

  62. [70]

    Gurses, D

    V. Gurses, D. Sarkar, S. Davis, and A. Hajimiri, An in- tegrated photonic-electronic quantum coherent receiver for sub-shot-noise-limited optical links, in Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2024 (Optica Pub- lishing Group, 2024) p. Tu2C.1

    2024

  63. [71]

    J. F. Tasker, J. Frazer, G. Ferranti, and J. C. F. Matthews, A bi-cmos electronic pho- tonic integrated circuit quantum light detec- tor, Science Advances 10, eadk6890 (2024), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.adk6890. 12 0 2 4 6 8 −86 −84 −82 0 2 4 6 8 0 50 100 p...

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.