Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Topological phase transition to a hidden charge density wave liquid

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first observation of a liquid charge density wave, produced transiently in 1T-TaS2 by femtosecond photoexcitation that bypasses a structural phase transition and melts the CDW into a state with local periodicity but…

desk verdict A careful UED study that plausibly observes a liquid CDW in photoexcited 1T-TaS2, but the thermodynamic assignment rests on a quasi-thermal steady state that is asserted rather than demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04867 v1 pith:JAXUE4F5 submitted 2025-05-08 cond-mat.str-el

Joshua S.H. Lee , Thomas M. Sutter , Goran Karapetrov , Pietro Musumeci , Anshul Kogar This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords chargedensitywaveliquidhexaticphaseKTHNYtheory1T-TaS2ultrafastelectrondiffractiontopologicaldefectsphotoinducedtransitionhiddenphases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Charge density waves are electronic crystals, and theory has long predicted that they can melt into a liquid with local periodicity but no long-range order, yet no such liquid had been seen. The paper reports it in 1T-TaS2 by using a femtosecond laser pulse to heat the material so quickly that it skips an irreversible structural transition that normally blocks the melting region. When the starting temperature is near 520K, the CDW diffraction peaks broaden into an isotropic diffuse ring at the CDW wavevector, which the authors read as complete loss of translational and orientational order. At lower starting temperatures the same pulse produces only a transient hexatic state that recovers into a solid, matching the two-step defect-unbinding scenario of KTHNY theory. If correct, the result establishes a new state of electronic matter and a general protocol for reaching hidden phases.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the KTHNY defect-unbinding picture of two-dimensional melting, applied to the triple-q CDW superlattice of 1T-TaS2, whose three concurrent CDWs preserve a triangular lattice motif. In this picture, dislocation pairs unbind first, producing a hexatic with quasi-long-range orientational order but no translational order; then dislocations dissociate into disclinations, producing a liquid with no long-range order of either kind. The experimental machinery is ultrafast electron diffraction with 375 fs temporal resolution, and the analysis machinery is the azimuthal Fourier decomposition $I_{\rm norm}(\phi,t)=C_0(t)+\sum_{n=1}^{4} A_{6n}(t)\cos(6n\phi)$, whose offset $C_0$ and fundamental coefficient $A_6$ track the loss of orientational order. A two-dimensional molecular dynamics simulation with a quenched coupling constant reproduces the same defect populations and diffraction signatures, supporting the claim that the quench pathway also proceeds through topological defects.

What would settle it

Measure the diffuse ring at the CDW wavevector over delay times extending to nanoseconds at an initial temperature of 520K, while monitoring the thermal diffuse background and Bragg peaks: if the liquid CDW is a stable quasi-thermal state, the ring should persist unchanged and the background should stop rising once heat has diffused, whereas a ring that narrows, develops sixfold modulation, or vanishes as the background keeps growing would show the state is transient. A direct calibration of the lattice temperature at $t_\infty$ from the Debye-Waller suppression of Bragg peaks would test the assumed 680K.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that photoexcitation drives a topological phase transition in the incommensurate CDW of 1T-TaS2: dislocations unbind to give a hexatic state, and at higher temperatures disclinations unbind to give a liquid CDW. The liquid signature is an isotropic ring of diffuse scattering at the CDW wavevector that persists at long delay times and is distinct from the thermal diffuse background, along with persistent radial broadening of the CDW peak. Quantitatively, the azimuthal Fourier analysis gives $C_0 \approx 1$ and $A_6 \approx 0$ at an inferred final temperature near 680K, while at 360K the same protocol produces only a transient hexatic with $A_6 \approx 1$ followed by recovery to the solid. The experiment works by maintaining the 1T structure above the 1T-to-2H transition temperature, so the sample reaches a layer-decoupled regime where the CDW behaves as independent 2D layers and KTHNY melting can proceed.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation depends on the photoexcited sample settling into a stable, hotter state at a known temperature near 680K by the time the measurements are taken, but that temperature rise is calculated from material parameters rather than measured directly, so if the lattice is still heating or has not equilibrated, the diffuse ring could be a transient disordered state rather than a true liquid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the liquid CDW is a genuine state, CDW melting in quasi-2D materials proceeds through a two-step KTHNY cascade: hexatic first, then isotropic liquid, with disclination unbinding as the final step.
  • The pump-and-diffract protocol becomes a general way to access phase-space regions blocked by intervening structural transitions, potentially revealing hidden electronic liquid-crystal phases in other correlated materials.
  • The quench-regime dynamics, reproduced by a simulation with a rapidly suppressed interaction, show that topological defect populations can be controlled by the pump, consistent with a Kibble-Zurek-type mechanism.
  • A stable liquid CDW would realize the long-predicted role of such states in the anomalous normal-state properties of cuprates, transition-metal dichalcogenides, kagome metals, and quantum Hall systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to look for the same isotropic ring in a quasi-2D CDW material whose layer-decoupling temperature lies below its structural transition, which should show a liquid CDW in equilibrium without any pump.
  • The Fourier-decomposition analysis ($C_0$ and $A_{6n}$) could be applied to existing ultrafast diffraction data on other charge-ordered compounds to search for hidden hexatic or liquid order in their recovery dynamics.
  • Varying the pump fluence should change the final disclination density and therefore the sharpness of the hexatic-to-liquid crossover, a prediction not tested by the single-fluence data in this paper.
  • If the ring's integrated intensity scales with CDW order-parameter fluctuations rather than phonon population as the background temperature is varied, that would independently confirm its electronic origin.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports ultrafast electron diffraction measurements on 1T-TaS2 after femtosecond 840 nm photoexcitation. The authors show that the incommensurate CDW satellite peaks recover from a photoinduced melt through a state with azimuthally broadened, sixfold-symmetric peaks (hexatic) at low initial temperature (360 K), while at higher initial temperature (520 K) the CDW scattering becomes an isotropic, radially broadened ring at the CDW wavevector, distinct from the thermal diffuse background. They interpret this ring as a liquid CDW state—finite local CDW periodicity without long-range translational or orientational order—formed by disclination unbinding, and support the interpretation with a two-dimensional molecular dynamics simulation with a quenched Yukawa coupling. The abstract claims this is the first observation of a liquid CDW and presents a protocol for accessing phases hidden by an intervening structural transition.

Significance. If correct, this is a noteworthy result: a liquid CDW has been speculated about for decades and would represent a new electronic state, with implications for cuprates, transition metal dichalcogenides, and other correlated systems. The paper has real strengths: the differential procedure I(t) - I(tmin) is a sensible way to isolate the CDW ring from the static background; the Fourier decomposition provides quantitative time-resolved measures of orientational order; the 2D molecular dynamics simulation is a useful forward model demonstrating a plausible defect-mediated pathway; and the experimental protocol for bypassing the 1T-to-2H transition is original. The main weakness is that the central identification of a thermodynamic liquid depends on a quasi-thermal steady state and a known temperature at t∞ that are not fully demonstrated, and on scattering signatures that are also consistent with a random mosaic of small CDW domains. These are correctness risks rather than internal inconsistencies; the paper would be strengthened by additional analysis or by moderating the claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Main text, paragraph beginning 'Together, these data...'; Fig. 2(d); Supplementary Note VIII, Eqs. (S4)-(S6)] The assignment of the isotropic ring at t∞ to a stable liquid CDW assumes that the system has reached a quasi-thermal steady state by t∞. The manuscript states 'the system no longer changes with time,' but Fig. 2(d) shows the Bragg intensity still decreasing and the diffuse background still increasing through t∞, and the fits in Eqs. (S5)-(S6) are relaxations that do not demonstrate plateaus. This is an assumption, not a demonstrated experimental fact, and it is load-bearing: if the lattice is still heating or the electronic system has not fully thermalized, the ring at t∞ could be a transient hot or quench-disordered state rather than a thermodynamic liquid CDW. Please provide direct evidence of a plateau (e.g., a longer delay range or a time-resolved lattice-temperature measurement) or explicitly reframe the conclusion as a transient-state observation.
  2. [Supplementary Note V, Eq. (S2); main text sentence 'the temperature at t=t∞ is raised by about 160 K'] The inferred final temperatures, T(t∞)=520 K and 680 K, are load-bearing for placing the observed states on a KTHNY phase diagram, but the temperature rise of about 160 K is calculated, not measured. Eq. (S2) uses bulk reflectance, transmittance, heat capacity, density, and thickness, assumes full thermalization in the 60 nm flake by t∞, and ignores the nonuniform absorption implied by the Beer-Lambert attenuation (the attenuation length is comparable to the sample thickness). No uncertainty is quoted. Please quantify the systematic uncertainty in T(t∞), cross-check the lattice temperature against a measured quantity such as the Bragg Debye-Waller suppression or the phonon diffuse intensity, and state explicitly how the thickness-averaged absorption affects the inferred uniform temperature.
  3. [Main text, paragraphs beginning 'To observe the liquid CDW state' and 'Together, these data...'] A continuous, radially broadened isotropic ring at the CDW wavevector is the central experimental evidence for the liquid state, but the same diffraction pattern would also result from a random mosaic of small, orientationally disordered CDW domains or a glassy quench-disordered state. The manuscript does not provide a quantitative test that distinguishes a disclination-unbound liquid from such a mosaic (for example, correlation lengths extracted from the ring profile, or the temperature dependence of the ring width compared with KTHNY expectations). The main text says the disclination interpretation is 'suggestive,' while the abstract calls it 'compelling evidence.' Please provide the discriminating analysis or align the abstract with the level of evidence actually presented.
  4. [Fig. 3(b); Supplementary Note IX, Eq. (S10) and the Fourier-decomposition text] The Fourier offset C0(t) mixes the isotropic CDW ring with the diffuse background, as the paper acknowledges. The claim that the ring at 520 K is 'distinct from the diffuse background' is currently supported only by overlaying the background C0 for visual comparison. Since at 360 K the IC-CDW and diffuse-background C0 values agree within error, this separation is essential. Please provide a quantitative decomposition—for example, subtract the diffuse-background azimuthal profile measured at a nearby momentum, or fit the CDW ring and the background simultaneously—and report the residual ring intensity and its uncertainty.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract vs. main text] The abstract states 'compelling evidence for a defect-unbinding transition,' while the main text says 'These data are suggestive that the dislocation-type defects have dissociated into unbound disclination pairs'; please harmonize the strength of the claim with the evidence level.
  2. [Supplementary Note IX, Eq. (S10) and Fig. S7] At T=520 K the fit reports A12=0.61±0.10, which could be misread as a strong 12-fold azimuthal modulation; because of the normalization convention the actual peak-to-peak variation is only a few percent. Please report the peak-to-peak modulation or the residual explicitly so the isotropy claim is transparent.
  3. [Fig. 2(b) and (e)] The single-overlay examples would be more convincing if the full fitted Fourier model and residuals were shown for each time point, rather than only the dominant harmonic or a constant line.
  4. [Supplementary Note X, 2DMDS] The simulation is tuned through J1, J2, ξ1, ξ2, the noise variance, and the J1 ramp rate; the text should state explicitly that the simulation is illustrative rather than a parameter-free prediction, particularly because the main text invokes the Kibble-Zurek mechanism for the quench regime.
  5. [Fig. 2 and main text definitions] Please define t∞ operationally in the main text or Supplementary Information: state which delay-time window is averaged, how many frames are used, and how the value 4.25 ps after tmin is chosen.
  6. [Supplementary Note V] The transmittance is quoted as T=0.10, but direct evaluation of exp(-μz) with the stated μ=0.036 nm^-1 and z=60 nm gives approximately 0.12; please check the arithmetic or define the effective transmittance used in Eq. (S2).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the liquid-CDW claim rests on measured diffraction signatures and an independent KTHNY interpretive framework, not on fitted or self-cited inputs.

full rationale

The central claim is an experimental identification: the hexatic state is assigned from azimuthal broadening with A6(t)≈1 and the liquid state from an isotropic ring at the CDW wavevector (C0(t∞)≈1) together with persistent radial broadening. These are the standard KTHNY scattering signatures, and they are extracted directly from measured diffraction profiles via the Fourier decomposition in Eq. 1 and Eq. S10. No parameter is fitted to the liquid-state claim and then renamed as a prediction. The 160 K temperature rise in Supplementary Note V is an independent calorimetric estimate from Eq. S2 using bulk reflectance, fluence, heat capacity, density, and thickness; it is not extracted from the azimuthal or radial line shapes that define the liquid state. The 2D molecular dynamics simulation is a forward model with explicitly stated interaction terms (Eq. S11), and the paper does not use the simulation output to define the experimental observable. The only nonstandard assumption is that t∞ represents a quasi-thermal steady state; that assumption carries unquantified systematic uncertainty and is a correctness or interpretation issue, not a circular reduction of the claim to its inputs. Citations to prior work are either external (KTHNY theory, earlier hexatic observations) or instrumental (ref. 45) and are not load-bearing for the liquid-CDW conclusion. No self-citation chain, imported uniqueness theorem, or renamed known result is present, so the derivation chain is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on KTHNY theory, the layer-decoupling picture, and a specific interpretation of diffraction features. The simulation contributes hand-tuned parameters rather than independent predictions. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • J1 (Yukawa coupling) = ramped from 0 to 0.3
    In the 2DMDS, J1 is set to zero and linearly ramped to 0.3 to mimic the quench of CDW order; this hand-chosen ramp reproduces the experimental hexatic-liquid behavior.
  • J2 (orientational coupling) = 0.005
    Chosen to model the lattice bias; set constant in the simulation.
  • ξ1 (repulsive screening length) = 2 (simulation units)
    Sets the range of the Yukawa repulsion; chosen by hand.
  • ξ2 (angular screening length) = 1 (simulation units)
    Sets the range of the orientational force; chosen by hand.
  • Langevin noise variance = T/10
    The noise variance is proportional to simulation temperature divided by 10; this scaling is arbitrary.
  • Ramp rate of J1 = 5e-6 per step
    Controls the quench speed; chosen to reproduce the timescale separation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption KTHNY theory of 2D melting applies to the triple-q CDW in 1T-TaS2
    The paper interprets hexatic and liquid signatures within the KTHNY defect-unbinding scenario.
  • domain assumption The IC-CDW behaves as stacks of independent 2D layers between T* and TMF
    Used to justify that KTHNY is applicable in the layer-decoupled regime; T* ~ 630K and TMF ~ 750K are estimated.
  • ad hoc to paper Photoexcitation melts the CDW by reducing the order parameter, and the subsequent dynamics can be modeled by a quench of J1
    This is the basis for the 2DMDS; not directly derived from first principles.
  • domain assumption The isotropic ring at the CDW wavevector after background subtraction uniquely identifies a CDW liquid
    The key interpretive step; alternative origins such as short-range-ordered CDW grains or phonon scattering are argued against by the differential analysis.
  • domain assumption The sample retains the 1T structure at inferred temperatures above 600 K during the measurement
    Required to claim the liquid CDW is in the 1T phase; the presence of the ring at the CDW wavevector is indirect evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological phase transition to a hidden charge density wave liquid." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JAXUE4F5

@misc{pith2026250504867,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological phase transition to a hidden charge density wave liquid},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JAXUE4F5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04867}
}
read the original abstract

Charge density waves (CDWs), electronic crystals that form within a host solid, have long been speculated to melt into a spatially textured electronic liquid. Though they have not been previously detected, liquid CDWs may nonetheless be fundamental to the phase diagrams of many correlated electron systems, including high temperature superconductors and quantum Hall states. In one of the most promising candidate materials capable of hosting a liquid CDW, 1T-TaS2, a structural phase transition impedes its observation. Here, by irradiating the material with a femtosecond light pulse, we circumvent the structural phase transition to reveal how topological defect dynamics govern the otherwise invisible CDW correlations. Upon photoexcitation, the CDW diffraction peaks broaden azimuthally, initially revealing a hexatic state. At higher temperatures, photoexcitation completely destroys translational and orientational order and only a ring of diffuse scattering is observed, a key signature of a liquid CDW. Our work provides compelling evidence for a defect-unbinding transition to a CDW liquid and presents a protocol for uncovering states that are hidden by other transitions in thermal equilibrium.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04867 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spatiotemporal Order and Parametric Instabilities from First-Principles

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A symmetry-based screen with first-principles nonlinear couplings predicts candidate materials for light-induced spatiotemporal parametric instabilities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    H. Dai, H. Chen, and C. M. Lieber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3183 (1991)

    work page 1991

  2. [2]

    Dai and C

    H. Dai and C. M. Lieber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1576 (1992)

    work page 1992

  3. [3]

    S. M. Hayden and J. M. Tranquada, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 15, 215 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Subires, A

    D. Subires, A. Kar, A. Korshunov, C. Fuller, Y. Jiang, H. Hu, D. C˘ alug˘ aru, C. McMonagle, C. Yi, S. Roychowdhury, et al. , arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04452 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    S. A. Kivelson, E. Fradkin, and V. J. Emery, Nature 393, 550 (1998)

    1998

  6. [6]

    L. V. Delacr´ etaz, B. Gout´ eraux, S. A. Hartnoll, and A. Karlsson, Phys. Rev. B 96, 195128 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Taraphder, S

    A. Taraphder, S. Koley, N. Vidhyadhiraja, and M. Laad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236405 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    C. Snow, J. Karpus, S. Cooper, T. Kidd, and T.-C. Chiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 136402 (2003)

    work page 2003

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Ciftja, C

    O. Ciftja, C. M. Lapilli, and C. Wexler, Phys. Rev. B 69, 125320 (2004)

    2004

  2. [10]

    Wexler and O

    C. Wexler and O. Ciftja, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 14, 3705 (2002)

    2002

  3. [11]

    Fradkin and S

    E. Fradkin and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8065 (1999)

    1999

  4. [12]

    L. Nie, G. Tarjus, and S. A. Kivelson, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 7980 13 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Milward, M

    G. Milward, M. Calder´ on, and P. Littlewood, Nature 433, 607 (2005)

    2005

  6. [14]

    M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Science 269, 198 (1995)

    1995

  7. [15]

    K. B. Davis, M. O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995)

    1995

  8. [16]

    C. M. Tenney, Z. F. Croft, and J. M. McMahon, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 125, 23349 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Leggett, in PWA90: A Lifetime of Emergence (World Scientific, 2016) pp

    A. Leggett, in PWA90: A Lifetime of Emergence (World Scientific, 2016) pp. 97–103

    2016

  10. [18]

    Stojchevska, I

    L. Stojchevska, I. Vaskivskyi, T. Mertelj, P. Kusar, D. Svetin, S. Brazovskii, and D. Mihailovic, Science 344, 177 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Kogar, A

    A. Kogar, A. Zong, P. E. Dolgirev, X. Shen, J. Straquadine, Y.-Q. Bie, X. Wang, T. Rohwer, I.-C. Tung, Y. Yang, et al. , Nature Physics 16, 159 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Fausti, R

    D. Fausti, R. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Dienst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, and A. Cavalleri, Science 331, 189 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    A. Disa, J. Curtis, M. Fechner, A. Liu, A. Von Hoegen, M. F¨ orst, T. Nova, P. Narang, A. Maljuk, A. Boris, et al. , Nature 617, 73 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Mitrano, A

    M. Mitrano, A. Cantaluppi, D. Nicoletti, S. Kaiser, A. Perucchi, S. Lupi, P. Di Pietro, D. Pontiroli, M. Ricc` o, S. R. Clark,et al. , Nature 530, 461 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    T. Nova, A. Disa, M. Fechner, and A. Cavalleri, Science 364, 1075 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    X. Li, T. Qiu, J. Zhang, E. Baldini, J. Lu, A. M. Rappe, and K. A. Nelson, Science 364, 1079 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    D. R. Nelson and B. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B 19, 2457 (1979)

    1979

  18. [26]

    B. I. Halperin and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 121 (1978)

    1978

  19. [27]

    J. M. Kosterlitz, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 026001 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    P. Keim, G. Maret, and H. H. von Gr¨ unberg, Phys. Rev. E 75, 031402 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    R. E. Kusner, J. A. Mann, J. Kerins, and A. J. Dahm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3113 (1994)

    1994

  22. [30]

    Troyanovski, M

    A. Troyanovski, M. Van Hecke, N. Saha, J. Aarts, and P. Kes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 147006 (2002)

    2002

  23. [31]

    Guillam´ on, H

    I. Guillam´ on, H. Suderow, A. Fern´ andez-Pacheco, J. Ses´ e, R. C´ ordoba, J. M. De Teresa, M. R. Ibarra, and S. Vieira, Nature Physics 5, 651 (2009)

    2009

  24. [32]

    I. Roy, S. Dutta, A. N. Roy Choudhury, S. Basistha, I. Maccari, S. Mandal, J. Jesudasan, V. Bagwe, C. Castellani, L. Benfatto, and P. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 047001 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    J. D. Brock, A. Aharony, R. J. Birgeneau, K. W. Evans-Lutterodt, J. D. Litster, P. M. Horn, G. B. Stephenson, and A. R. Tajbakhsh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 98 (1986)

    1986

  26. [34]

    Cheng, J

    M. Cheng, J. T. Ho, S. W. Hui, and R. Pindak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 550 (1988)

    1988

  27. [35]

    Sharma, D

    R. Sharma, D. Rey, L. Longchambon, A. Perrin, H. Perrin, and R. Dubessy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 143401 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Huang, T

    P. Huang, T. Sch¨ onenberger, M. Cantoni, L. Heinen, A. Magrez, A. Rosch, F. Carbone, and H. M. 14 Rønnow, Nature Nanotechnology 15, 761 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Gallet, G

    F. Gallet, G. Deville, A. Vald` es, and F. I. B. Williams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 212 (1982)

    1982

  30. [38]

    Knighton, Z

    T. Knighton, Z. Wu, J. Huang, A. Serafin, J. S. Xia, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. B 97, 085135 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    S. H. Sung, N. Agarwal, I. El Baggari, P. Kezer, Y. M. Goh, N. Schnitzer, J. M. Shen, T. Chiang, Y. Liu, W. Lu, et al. , Nat. Comm. 15, 1403 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Domr¨ ose, T

    T. Domr¨ ose, T. Danz, S. F. Schaible, K. Rossnagel, S. V. Yalunin, and C. Ropers, Nature Materials 22, 1345 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Givens and G

    F. Givens and G. Fredericks, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 38, 1363 (1977)

    1977

  34. [42]

    Gruner, Density waves in solids (CRC press, 2018)

    G. Gruner, Density waves in solids (CRC press, 2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    R. E. Thomson, U. Walter, E. Ganz, J. Clarke, A. Zettl, P. Rauch, and F. J. DiSalvo, Phys. Rev. B 38, 10734 (1988)

    1988

  36. [44]

    Rossnagel, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 23, 213001 (2011)

    K. Rossnagel, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 23, 213001 (2011)

    2011

  37. [45]

    T. M. Sutter, J. S. Lee, A. V. Kulkarni, P. Musumeci, and A. Kogar, Structural Dynamics 11 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    A. Zong, A. Kogar, Y.-Q. Bie, T. Rohwer, C. Lee, E. Baldini, E. Erge¸ cen, M. B. Yilmaz, B. Freelon, E. J. Sie, et al. , Nature Physics 15, 27 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Cheng, A

    Y. Cheng, A. Zong, J. Li, W. Xia, S. Duan, W. Zhao, Y. Li, F. Qi, J. Wu, L. Zhao, et al., Nat. Comm. 13, 963 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Gonzalez-Vallejo, V

    I. Gonzalez-Vallejo, V. L. R. Jacques, D. Boschetto, G. Rizza, A. Hadj-Azzem, J. Faure, and D. Le Bol- loc’h, Structural Dynamics 9, 014502 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Trigo, P

    M. Trigo, P. Giraldo-Gallo, M. E. Kozina, T. Henighan, M. P. Jiang, H. Liu, J. N. Clark, M. Chollet, J. M. Glownia, D. Zhu, T. Katayama, D. Leuenberger, P. S. Kirchmann, I. R. Fisher, Z. X. Shen, and D. A. Reis, Phys. Rev. B 99, 104111 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    T.-R. T. Han, Z. Tao, S. D. Mahanti, K. Chang, C.-Y. Ruan, C. D. Malliakas, and M. G. Kanatzidis, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 86, 075145 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 105701 (2005)

    2005

  44. [52]

    Dziarmaga, Phys

    J. Dziarmaga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 245701 (2005)

    2005

  45. [53]

    Polkovnikov, Phys

    A. Polkovnikov, Phys. Rev. B 72, 161201 (2005)

    2005

  46. [54]

    Di Salvo, B

    F. Di Salvo, B. Bagley, J. Voorhoeve, and J. Waszczak, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 34, 1357 (1973)

    1973

  47. [55]

    Di Salvo, J

    F. Di Salvo, J. Wilson, B. Bagley, and J. Waszczak, Physical Review B 12, 2220 (1975)

    1975

  48. [56]

    Yan-Bin, L

    Q. Yan-Bin, L. Yan-Ling, Z. Guo-Hua, Z. Zhi, and Q. Xiao-Ying, Chinese Physics 16, 3809 (2007)

    2007

  49. [57]

    Li and G

    W. Li and G. V. Naik, Optical Materials Express 9, 497 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Ma˜ nas-Valero, B

    S. Ma˜ nas-Valero, B. M. Huddart, T. Lancaster, E. Coronado, and F. L. Pratt, npj Quantum Materials 6, 69 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    W. M. Haynes, CRC handbook of chemistry and physics (CRC press, 2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    “Numba,” (2018), available at: https://numba.pydata.org. 15

    2018

  53. [61]

    NetworkX,

    “NetworkX,” (2024), available at: https://networkx.org. Supplementary Information for Topological phase transition to a hidden charge density wave liquid Joshua S.H. Lee, 1,∗ Thomas M. Sutter, 1,∗ Goran Karapetrov,2 Pietro Musumeci, 1 and Anshul Kogar 1,† 1Department of Physic...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.