Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.408189Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
As of 18 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 51 of 51 outbound references and 10 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2505.04966.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T05:22:49.527648Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z
Reference resolution
51 of 51 outbound references displayed
- verified exact2
- verified fuzzy28
- unresolved21
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
0
arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z
Outbound references
Observation 64c6385e-2f1f-4ce7-ba1e-e598295ff6f8 · outbound
This paper cites write newline.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards write newline
Reference 1
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.187179Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d0f3a452-840e-4914-a150-bfa133540d20 · outbound
This paper cites Has the Machine Learning Review Process Become More Arbitrary as the Field Has Grown? The NeurIPS 2021 Consistency Experiment.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Has the Machine Learning Review Process Become More Arbitrary as the Field Has Grown? The NeurIPS 2021 Consistency Experiment
Reference 2
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.192501Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 31192ae8-f3e6-4d3c-ac82-9e06f1cde3d0 · outbound
This paper cites and Daniel, H.-D.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards and Daniel, H.-D
Reference 3
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:08.138358Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation e12c9005-562d-4077-998a-d638008b3be9 · outbound
This paper cites On the inaccuracy of numerical ratings: dealing with biased opinions in social networks.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards On the inaccuracy of numerical ratings: dealing with biased opinions in social networks
Reference 4
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:08.124141Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 338c1b0c-5185-4ddc-888e-5372076b6922 · outbound
This paper cites Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment
Reference 5
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.206008Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b6d34c4e-6afd-44e3-88c7-d07c7384d3ff · outbound
This paper cites The dangers of using large language models for peer review.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards The dangers of using large language models for peer review
Reference 6
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:08.110699Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation bf2a4be5-71b7-4e12-99b2-ab44d048e5d0 · outbound
This paper cites M., Elsaid, K., and Almeer, S.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards M., Elsaid, K., and Almeer, S
Reference 7
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:08.096632Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation b596d6b2-f09f-42ac-87be-206dffb32775 · outbound
This paper cites Educational functions and design of badge systems: A conceptual literature review.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Educational functions and design of badge systems: A conceptual literature review
Reference 8
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:08.082514Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 3883d5ff-db73-4e89-b05b-0d78ec9d5847 · outbound
This paper cites Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science
Reference 9
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:08.069506Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 41806929-42d1-4bbb-8075-7bd5b07d78ce · outbound
This paper cites and Torgler, B.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards and Torgler, B
Reference 10
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:08.055870Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 8e6a8160-7a47-4525-81a4-374af04f77aa · outbound
This paper cites Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conference.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conference
Reference 11
- Resolution
- verified exact
- local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.651031Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 6cff6c84-dfde-4871-9cf6-600196bcd551 · outbound
This paper cites Digital badges in education.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Digital badges in education
Reference 12
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:08.042727Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation d7b90a6b-2143-4f1a-abf2-68f5f4717166 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Unresolved cited work
Reference 13
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:08.027658Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation d2a83849-d7a2-4bc4-99a1-4ed4c3117db4 · outbound
This paper cites Potential biases in big data: Omitted voices on social media.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Potential biases in big data: Omitted voices on social media
Reference 14
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:08.014099Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 15c1759e-58d2-4c5f-b0e8-dde97e2d4be1 · outbound
This paper cites What makes a successful rebuttal in computer science conferences?: A perspective on social interaction.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards What makes a successful rebuttal in computer science conferences?: A perspective on social interaction
Reference 15
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:08.000597Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 4814f663-87cb-4208-9870-c89fe25787ba · outbound
This paper cites On the Detection of Reviewer-Author Collusion Rings From Paper Bidding.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards On the Detection of Reviewer-Author Collusion Rings From Paper Bidding
Reference 16
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.255591Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 80ec50b8-f68b-4486-905f-e621a5345c5e · outbound
This paper cites Author-based analysis of conference versus journal publication in computer science.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Author-based analysis of conference versus journal publication in computer science
Reference 17
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.986841Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 4cef054d-a396-4290-a86d-2c595f17f9a3 · outbound
This paper cites What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?
Reference 18
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.264024Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f27aebfb-a419-44df-83c9-3f621da2bd9f · outbound
This paper cites Mapping the increasing use of llms in scientific papers.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Mapping the increasing use of llms in scientific papers
Reference 19
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.972900Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 7d57ddfb-4e3c-4635-983c-4da0aa7d2edc · outbound
This paper cites Monitoring ai-modified content at scale: A case study on the impact of chatgpt on ai conference peer reviews.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Monitoring ai-modified content at scale: A case study on the impact of chatgpt on ai conference peer reviews
Reference 20
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.959335Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation c08e6d94-e179-49b1-82fc-2a58fb7907d3 · outbound
This paper cites Y., Yang, X., Vodrahalli, K., He, S., Smith, D.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Y., Yang, X., Vodrahalli, K., He, S., Smith, D
Reference 21
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.945684Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 3725b206-e125-4e32-a116-0bdd72f9c081 · outbound
This paper cites ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing
Reference 22
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.281609Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ac7bb54c-fc18-47f2-ac1b-ad6ff8d44d04 · outbound
This paper cites The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery
Reference 23
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.286866Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation bc9f56f8-455f-40de-a3a2-8c5da8af1c7c · outbound
This paper cites Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024
Reference 24
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.291582Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 5e697180-93b0-48c3-b37d-cced995a603e · outbound
This paper cites and McCallum, A.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards and McCallum, A
Reference 25
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.932327Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 8b5c7b8d-c51e-43bf-94a8-635320db6e95 · outbound
This paper cites Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers
Reference 26
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.918599Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 9171ce2c-a01e-4849-b1de-8b240593fa4c · outbound
This paper cites and Alperin, J.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards and Alperin, J
Reference 27
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.904913Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 65c90784-869b-4a73-866b-e9e58294c422 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Unresolved cited work
Reference 28
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.891827Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation fe0be6fc-2fbd-4b84-8f21-38d552c11da8 · outbound
This paper cites and Augenstein, I.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards and Augenstein, I
Reference 29
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.878161Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation adfe14bc-4635-4631-9f71-09697d142837 · outbound
This paper cites S., Gross, C.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards S., Gross, C
Reference 30
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.863985Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 6c66135f-66f4-48c3-9d01-81ecd02ad71b · outbound
This paper cites Some Ethical Issues in the Review Process of Machine Learning Conferences.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Some Ethical Issues in the Review Process of Machine Learning Conferences
Reference 31
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.320162Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2e2770ed-17f5-42cf-819b-0ed9fb03eb96 · outbound
This paper cites Avoiding a Tragedy of the Commons in the Peer Review Process.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Avoiding a Tragedy of the Commons in the Peer Review Process
Reference 32
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.324486Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation fc6ae9ed-a01b-490e-8b71-23f71fab8313 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Unresolved cited work
Reference 33
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.850915Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 877519b8-7876-4126-af60-44e3da923aeb · outbound
This paper cites Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Review.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Review
Reference 34
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.333383Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4721199d-ed68-452f-b157-3557f8f45822 · outbound
This paper cites and Carey, K.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards and Carey, K
Reference 35
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.837264Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 0c415aab-bd6b-4e36-a1db-ab24b14af7a5 · outbound
This paper cites How economics shapes science.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards How economics shapes science
Reference 36
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.823211Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 5061ec1a-f103-4da5-8b17-6e49cd42a3ca · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Unresolved cited work
Reference 37
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.808700Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 63933210-9845-4fd3-bf6f-d97e4462b094 · outbound
This paper cites You are the best reviewer of your own papers: An owner-assisted scoring mechanism.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards You are the best reviewer of your own papers: An owner-assisted scoring mechanism
Reference 38
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.795433Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation cd3e807d-b095-4cde-bbc4-5169634b940e · outbound
This paper cites An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process
Reference 39
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.354238Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 6143c6a7-780e-4e63-ab49-6074e891abb0 · outbound
This paper cites AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews
Reference 40
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.358653Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 1d29ed80-6ba8-4b91-8feb-199170312e85 · outbound
This paper cites Peer Prediction for Peer Review: Designing a Marketplace for Ideas.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Peer Prediction for Peer Review: Designing a Marketplace for Ideas
Reference 41
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.363380Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 9a935884-ef36-489c-93a0-29efcb194466 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Unresolved cited work
Reference 42
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.781166Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 2d4466e7-d7f5-4bb0-885f-3c93c28e29f0 · outbound
This paper cites Rewarding reviewers--sense or sensibility? a wiley study explained.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Rewarding reviewers--sense or sensibility? a wiley study explained
Reference 43
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.767165Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation d9cd8cd8-1eb1-49d2-a1e5-6270572173a4 · outbound
This paper cites Large Language Models for Simultaneous Named Entity Extraction and Spelling Correction.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Large Language Models for Simultaneous Named Entity Extraction and Spelling Correction
Reference 44
- Resolution
- verified exact
- local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.481014Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation fee54635-c219-4fd2-8ca6-397f40e28a78 · outbound
This paper cites An Isotonic Mechanism for Overlapping Ownership.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards An Isotonic Mechanism for Overlapping Ownership
Reference 45
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.381718Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 3f1ab25e-ef25-488d-9c7a-75dba94822d2 · outbound
This paper cites A truth serum for eliciting self-evaluations in scientific reviews.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards A truth serum for eliciting self-evaluations in scientific reviews
Reference 46
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.752187Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 2a962573-e701-4acc-8d1a-8d261081bb6b · outbound
This paper cites Making paper reviewing robust to bid manipulation attacks.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Making paper reviewing robust to bid manipulation attacks
Reference 47
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.737907Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 060ec0b5-a1d8-4b53-95ff-59970464cf8d · outbound
This paper cites E., Fang, F., Tomczak, J., Zhang, C., Xue, Z.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards E., Fang, F., Tomczak, J., Zhang, C., Xue, Z
Reference 48
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.723195Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 70b346b1-ce16-4427-a0fb-5651742a01cb · outbound
This paper cites Are We There Yet? Revealing the Risks of Utilizing Large Language Models in Scholarly Peer Review.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Are We There Yet? Revealing the Risks of Utilizing Large Language Models in Scholarly Peer Review
Reference 49
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.399860Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2aed15dc-0f43-4e5e-82a1-1930f872e11f · outbound
This paper cites A system-level analysis of conference peer review.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards A system-level analysis of conference peer review
Reference 50
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.708914Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 4573f235-029f-4083-b102-939694966f03 · outbound
This paper cites Is llm a reliable reviewer? a comprehensive evaluation of llm on automatic paper reviewing tasks.
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards Is llm a reliable reviewer? a comprehensive evaluation of llm on automatic paper reviewing tasks
Reference 51
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:19:07.694220Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Pith citing papers
Observation 5d292c9f-723f-41d7-9ec1-27476598e114 · inbound
Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem cites this paper.
Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
Reference 23
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T05:22:49.527648Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d3fa42b8-7e49-42b1-9411-aeab968d95df · inbound
Position: Academic Conferences are Potentially Facing Denominator Gaming Caused by Fully Automated Scientific Agents cites this paper.
Position: Academic Conferences are Potentially Facing Denominator Gaming Caused by Fully Automated Scientific Agents Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
Reference 12
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-12T05:41:26.211926Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation ccd96230-3d36-4c3e-bed0-9eed25d40a7a · inbound
Toward an Engineering of Science: Rebalancing Generation and Verification in the Age of AI cites this paper.
Toward an Engineering of Science: Rebalancing Generation and Verification in the Age of AI Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
Reference 16
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-12T05:36:25.833860Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation c9f67b27-7dd0-4b06-a420-6ccc2042afe6 · inbound
MLReplicate: Benchmarking Autonomous Research Systems for Machine Learning Reproducibility cites this paper.
MLReplicate: Benchmarking Autonomous Research Systems for Machine Learning Reproducibility Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
Reference 20
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-20T20:03:44.025076Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 5afe3b8f-ab11-421c-96ca-027450a20299 · inbound
Analyzing the Effects of Two-Stage Peer Evaluation cites this paper.
Analyzing the Effects of Two-Stage Peer Evaluation Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
Reference 21
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-30T14:24:44.753042Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation dc0e5722-56cd-4a73-97d3-8ba753796465 · inbound
No Hidden Prompts Needed! You Can Game AI Peer Review with Presentation-Only Revisions cites this paper.
No Hidden Prompts Needed! You Can Game AI Peer Review with Presentation-Only Revisions Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
Reference 12
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-03T15:08:33.678510Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 5f9cbb40-2e6d-4040-942f-eed1050a7465 · inbound
PseudoBench: Measuring How Agentic Auto-Research Fuels Pseudoscience cites this paper.
PseudoBench: Measuring How Agentic Auto-Research Fuels Pseudoscience Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
Reference 123
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-03T20:18:56.479358Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 0e253ae6-38a8-4bad-b59d-8b9e11f6cd38 · inbound
Reviewer Scores Are Not Comparable Across Research Areas in ML Peer Review cites this paper.
Reviewer Scores Are Not Comparable Across Research Areas in ML Peer Review Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
Reference 2025
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T15:15:45.867941Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 51fa18ae-f187-469f-86f9-f94efa357fdb · inbound
ReVoicer: Conversational Voice Annotation for Human-Centered, LLM-Assisted Peer Review cites this paper.
ReVoicer: Conversational Voice Annotation for Human-Centered, LLM-Assisted Peer Review Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
Reference 18
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T00:49:03.125338Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4a4ba0ee-c203-4189-ba21-5ff4f25e34cb · inbound
ReVoicer: Conversational Voice Annotation for Human-Centered, LLM-Assisted Peer Review cites this paper.
ReVoicer: Conversational Voice Annotation for Human-Centered, LLM-Assisted Peer Review Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
Reference 18
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T04:15:21.316357Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.