Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 7 minor 123 references

SVAD: From Single Image to 3D Avatar via Synthetic Data Generation with Video Diffusion and Data Augmentation

T0 review · 5 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read SVAD claims a single photograph is enough to create an animatable, real-time 3D avatar by training a 3D Gaussian avatar on a video-diffusion-generated synthetic sequence, with identity and restoration post-processing.

desk verdict Clever system paper that chains video diffusion and 3DGS for single-image avatars, but the SOTA claims rest on a thin evaluation and an untested view-consistency assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.05475 v1 pith:ACRW5A3P submitted 2025-05-08 cs.CV

Yonwoo Choi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords 3DavatargenerationsingleimagetovideodiffusionGaussiansplattingsynthetictrainingdataidentitypreservationrestorationhumananimation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to prove that a single photograph can supply enough information for a high-quality, animatable 3D human avatar, if the missing viewpoints are manufactured rather than captured. It proposes a pipeline, SVAD, in which a pose-conditioned video diffusion model animates the still image through a fixed 189-frame full-body rotation, an identity-preservation module fuses a reconstructed 3D head into the frames, and an image-restoration module sharpens details; the cleaned synthetic sequence then trains a 3D Gaussian Splatting avatar. The reported comparisons claim that this synthetic-data route outperforms existing single-image avatar methods on identity preservation and novel-pose adaptation, and that the resulting avatar renders in real time. A sympathetic reader should care because it would break the usual dependence of high-fidelity avatars on dense monocular video or multi-view capture, and would make photorealistic avatars a single-click operation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the synthetic training sequence itself: 189 frames of a subject rotating with arms extended, produced by a pose-conditioned video diffusion model from the single input image. The augmentation stack is what makes that sequence usable as training data—Poisson-based face fusion from a reconstructed 3D head locks identity, diffusion-based restoration recovers fine texture, and parametric-body fitting plus a Laplacian regularizer binds the Gaussians to a deformable body model. All of it exists to convert one photo into many pseudo-observations that a 3D Gaussian avatar can be trained on, so that inference happens in the fast Gaussian renderer rather than in the diffusion model.

What would settle it

Generate an avatar from a front-facing photo of a person who also has a real back-view photograph, render the avatar from the same back camera position, and compare local texture similarity against the real photo; a systematic drop for back views, accompanied by inconsistent patterns, would show the synthetic sequence is not serving as a consistent multi-view observation set.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

SVAD's central discovery is that hallucinated observations can stand in for captured observations in avatar reconstruction. Starting from one image, the method generates a temporally coherent animation with a video diffusion model, removes identity drift by blending in renderings of a 3D head avatar reconstructed from the same image, restores high-frequency detail with a diffusion-based restorer, and then trains a 3D Gaussian Splatting avatar on the refined frames. The author claims this is sufficient to produce a coherent 3D body with plausible side and back views, and reports that the avatar preserves facial identity and clothing details across novel poses and viewpoints, outperforming single-image baselines and enabling real-time rendering.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the 189-frame synthetic video generated from one photo behaves like a genuine multi-view recording of the same person, so that back and side views learned from it will not contradict the person's real appearance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If SVAD works as claimed, a single photograph is enough to produce a rigged, animatable avatar; no multi-view capture or monocular video is required.
  • The avatar can be reposed into novel poses and rendered from novel viewpoints in real time, because the trained representation is a 3D Gaussian avatar rather than a diffusion model at inference.
  • Identity and fine detail are carried from the input photo through the synthetic video to the final mesh, so facial features and clothing textures persist across animation.
  • The same single-image pipeline can be chained after text-to-image or text-editing models, which the paper demonstrates as text-to-avatar and text-guided avatar editing.
  • Performance is bounded by the synthetic generator's frontal bias: the paper's own failure cases show imperfect back views, loose-clothing deformation, and segmentation artifacts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the synthetic pose template is a fixed 189-frame rotation, a likely extension is to generate several synthetic sequences per identity with varied poses and camera paths; this could reduce the back-view inconsistency the paper reports without changing the pipeline's core claim.
  • A factorial ablation that isolates raw diffusion output, identity preservation only, restoration only, and both would make the contribution of each augmentation module clearer than the two removed-component ablations reported.
  • If back-view quality is inherited from the video generator's frontal bias, then swapping the generator for a multi-view-consistent one should directly raise the ceiling of the method; this is testable with the same downstream training and evaluation protocol.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes SVAD, a pipeline for creating animatable 3D Gaussian Splatting avatars from a single image. The method first generates a 189-frame pose-conditioned video using MusePose, a video diffusion model driven by a fixed full-body rotation pose sequence. The frames are then refined by an identity-preservation module (3D head reconstruction and Poisson-based face fusion) and an image-restoration module (BFRffusion-based super-resolution), after which an SMPL-X model is fitted and a 3DGS avatar is trained on the refined synthetic video. The authors claim state-of-the-art performance for single-image avatar generation on the People-Snapshot and THuman datasets, with real-time rendering after training. The paper also demonstrates text-to-3D and text-guided editing applications.

Significance. If the empirical claims were fully supported, SVAD would represent a practical advance: it would show that a single image plus a pretrained video diffusion model can supply enough training data for a high-quality animatable 3DGS avatar, avoiding the dense video or multi-view capture usually required. The paper is strong on pipeline integration and provides considerable implementation detail, including explicit hyperparameters and per-module ablations, and the applications section extends the method's scope. However, the significance is currently moderated by the weak empirical validation: the state-of-the-art claim rests on a single single-image baseline, no uncertainty quantification is provided, and the central multi-view consistency assumption of the synthetic data is not verified. The paper would contribute to the field if these issues were addressed with additional experiments and a more careful evaluation protocol.

major comments (5)
  1. [Secs. 3.1 and 3.3, Sec. C.3] The central premise is that the 189-frame MusePose-generated rotation forms a geometrically consistent multi-view observation of the same person, which is then used as the sole 3D supervision for the 3DGS avatar in Sec. 3.3. MusePose is a 2D image-to-video animation model without a shared 3D representation, and Sec. C.3 (Fig. 14) concedes visible back-view inconsistency. The paper provides no independent view-consistency check, so the reported advantage on novel-view synthesis (Tables 1 and 2, Fig. 7) could stem from hallucinated back or side texture rather than coherent 3D reconstruction. Please add a direct consistency test, e.g., cross-view reprojection error, or evaluate the avatar against a real multi-view capture of the same subject.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Tables 1 and 2] The claim that SVAD 'significantly outperforms SOTA single-image avatar generation methods' (Sec. 1) is supported by exactly one single-image avatar baseline: ExAvatar (Single Image) in Table 1. The other rows in Table 1 are monocular-video methods using roughly 200 frames, and Table 2 compares against single-view reconstruction methods (PIFu, TeCH, Ultraman, SIFU, SiTH), not animatable avatar systems. Please expand the baseline set to include more recent single-image animatable-avatar methods from the Related Work section, or narrow the claim accordingly.
  3. [Tables 1-4] All quantitative results are reported as single point estimates without variance, confidence intervals, or significance tests. Several margins are small or negative (e.g., Table 1, Male-4-casual PSNR: Ours 23.71 vs. ExAvatar Single Image 23.74), so the word 'significantly' is not supported by the evidence as presented. Reporting per-subject or per-seed deviations, or running multiple seeds of the stochastic pipeline, would be needed to substantiate the superiority claim.
  4. [Sec. A.1 and Table 1] The predefined pose template is explicitly taken from the male-4-casual sequence of People-Snapshot (Sec. A.1), and Table 1 evaluates on the Male-4-casual subject. If the synthetic training video for this subject uses the same rotation/pose sequence as the test sequence, then the 'novel pose and viewpoint' evaluation for this subject is not novel and may be contaminated. Please clarify whether the training and test pose sets are disjoint for each subject, and if not, exclude that subject or use a disjoint temporal split.
  5. [Sec. 4.4, Tables 3 and 4] The text states that the modules are 'required to reach the optimal performance reflected by all the metrics,' but Table 4 shows that the full model has worse LPIPS (0.1124) than the variant without image restoration (0.0799) on THuman, and the text concedes 'second best in LPIPS.' This contradicts the blanket claim. The paper should temper the statement or analyze why the restoration module degrades LPIPS on this dataset.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Throughout] The method name appears inconsistently as both 'SVAD' and 'SV AD'; please standardize.
  2. [Table 1 caption] The caption mentions 'the top two results for single-image input' but there is only one single-image baseline; please reword to avoid confusion.
  3. [Sec. 4.1 and Table 1] CLIP Similarity is introduced as one of the four evaluation metrics, but Table 1 does not report CLIP values. Either add CLIP to Table 1 or explain its omission.
  4. [Eq. (30)] The loss weights λ_RGB = 0.8, λ_SSIM = 0.2, and λ_LPIPS = 0.2 sum to 1.2; please clarify whether the weights are meant to be normalized or if the stated values are correct.
  5. [Sec. A.5.2] The text says the male SMPL-X model is used for all experiments 'due to its superior performance'; using a male template for female subjects may bias shape fitting and should be justified or avoided.
  6. [Sec. 3.1] The pose-alignment procedure lists 'ten distinct body regions' but enumerates only nine items (neck, face, shoulders, upper arms, lower arms, hands, torso, upper legs, lower legs); please reconcile the count.
  7. [Fig. 2] The figure labels 'Flame Tracking' and 'Flame' inconsistently; the abbreviation should be 'FLAME' everywhere.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; minor self-referential identity-copying in the augmentation module; central results are externally benchmarked.

  1. other [Sec. 3.2, Identity preservation sub-module (Eq. 4-6)]
    "From a single input image, we first create a 3D Gaussian-based head avatar using a method inspired by Chu et al. [15] ... These renderings provide high-quality, identity-consistent facial details across different viewpoints. ... we selectively apply the face fusion process only to frames where the head is front-facing ... This ensures temporally consistent facial details while preserving the original identity throughout the animation sequence."

    The identity-preservation module builds its rendered head images from the same single input image whose identity is later reported as 'preserved': Eq. 4 places the head Gaussians using features from that input, and Eq. 6 Poisson-blends the corresponding render into every front/side training frame. The facial content of the synthetic training video is therefore, by construction, a copy of the input identity rather than an independent 3D prediction. This makes identity-consistency claims partially self-fulfilling. It is a real but minor circularity: the paper's main quantitative avatar-quality results are evaluated against external ground-truth frames (People-Snapshot and THuman) and are not reduced to this copying.

full rationale

This is an empirical systems paper rather than a derivation of a first-principles result. The pipeline has three main stages: MusePose generates a 189-frame pose-conditioned video from the single image; the identity-preservation and image-restoration modules refine those frames; and ExAvatar-style 3DGS training consumes the refined data. The central quantitative claims (Tables 1-2) are benchmarked against external data—People-Snapshot ground-truth frames and THuman scan renderings—and against SOTA single-image baselines, so those claims do not reduce to the input by construction. No fitted parameter is later presented as a prediction, no load-bearing self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem appears, and no existing method is merely renamed. The geometric-consistency assumption about MusePose's synthetic rotation video is a correctness risk, not circularity, and the paper itself concedes back-view inconsistency in Sec. C.3. The only self-referential element is the identity-preservation sub-module, which renders a 3D head avatar from the input image and Poisson-blends it into the front/side training frames; any notion of 'identity consistency' is thereby partly built from the exact image whose identity is being measured. This inflates the appearance of identity preservation but does not invalidate the externally benchmarked reconstruction-quality comparisons. Hence score 1.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method relies on several domain assumptions about the reliability of off-the-shelf generative modules (MusePose, GAGAvatar, BFRffusion) and about the geometric consistency of synthetic video; none are validated directly in the paper. Free parameters are mainly hand-set hyperparameters and one empirically chosen restoration scale. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Image restoration upscale factor s = 1.5
    Sec 3.2: chosen via empirical analysis as the optimal balance between detail and artifacts; directly controls the quality of training frames.
  • Classifier-free guidance scale w = 3.5
    Sec 3.1 and A.4: set for video diffusion and restoration; hand-picked, affects identity fidelity versus artifacts.
  • 3DGS loss weights lambda_RGB/SSIM/LPIPS = 0.8 / 0.2 / 0.2
    A.5.2: hand-set weights in the avatar training objective; no sensitivity analysis is provided.
  • SMPL-X fitting loss weights lambda_kpt/reg/temp = 1.0 / 0.001 / 0.1
    A.5.1: hand-set weights for keypoint reprojection, regularization, and temporal smoothness; they influence pose accuracy.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption MusePose can generate a temporally consistent, pose-conditioned video of the same identity from a single image.
    Sec 3.1: the entire pipeline depends on this synthetic video as training signal; the paper cites MusePose's capabilities but does not validate multi-view consistency.
  • domain assumption The 189-frame rotating sequence is sufficient pose and viewpoint coverage to train a full 3DGS body avatar.
    Sec 3.1 and A.1: one rotation template is used for all subjects; no analysis of coverage sufficiency is given.
  • domain assumption The refined synthetic frames are geometrically consistent enough that SMPL-X fitting and 3DGS training converge to a coherent 3D body.
    Sec 3.3 and A.5: the 3DGS avatar is trained with the synthetic frames as pseudo-ground-truth; consistency is assumed, and back-view inconsistency is admitted only as a failure case in C.3.
  • domain assumption GAGAvatar head reconstruction from a single image preserves identity well enough for face fusion.
    Sec 3.2 and A.3: face fusion quality depends on this; no independent evaluation of head avatar fidelity is provided.
  • domain assumption BFRffusion restoration improves training data without introducing artifacts that hurt 3DGS training.
    Sec 3.2 and A.4: restoration is applied before training; the paper picks s=1.5 to avoid artifacts but does not verify the effect on final avatar metrics across scales.
  • domain assumption Anim-NeRF optimized pose parameters provide correct ground-truth poses for evaluation.
    Sec 4.1: the paper freezes these optimized parameters for fair comparison; errors in them would propagate to reported metrics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SVAD: From Single Image to 3D Avatar via Synthetic Data Generation with Video Diffusion and Data Augmentation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ACRW5A3P

@misc{pith2026250505475,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SVAD: From Single Image to 3D Avatar via Synthetic Data Generation with Video Diffusion and Data Augmentation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ACRW5A3P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.05475}
}
read the original abstract

Creating high-quality animatable 3D human avatars from a single image remains a significant challenge in computer vision due to the inherent difficulty of reconstructing complete 3D information from a single viewpoint. Current approaches face a clear limitation: 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) methods produce high-quality results but require multiple views or video sequences, while video diffusion models can generate animations from single images but struggle with consistency and identity preservation. We present SVAD, a novel approach that addresses these limitations by leveraging complementary strengths of existing techniques. Our method generates synthetic training data through video diffusion, enhances it with identity preservation and image restoration modules, and utilizes this refined data to train 3DGS avatars. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that SVAD outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) single-image methods in maintaining identity consistency and fine details across novel poses and viewpoints, while enabling real-time rendering capabilities. Through our data augmentation pipeline, we overcome the dependency on dense monocular or multi-view training data typically required by traditional 3DGS approaches. Extensive quantitative, qualitative comparisons show our method achieves superior performance across multiple metrics against baseline models. By effectively combining the generative power of diffusion models with both the high-quality results and rendering efficiency of 3DGS, our work establishes a new approach for high-fidelity avatar generation from a single image input.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05475 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall Pipeline of SVAD. Starting from a single input image, the diffusion model generates pose-conditioned animations, which are refined using an identity preservation module and an image restoration module. The refined outputs are then used to train the 3DGS avatar, enabling high-fidelity, animatable 3D avatars with consistent details across poses and viewpoints. data, we proceed to train a 3DGS avatar model, as … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. 3D Avatars trained by SVAD. SVAD generates high quality 3D avatars with just a single-image. The trained avatars can be rendered from any view point, in any pose. per legs, and lower legs. For each body part i, we compute its scale factor si as the ratio between the corresponding keypoint distances. For body parts with bilateral symmetry (e.g., arms), we average the scales from both sides: s_{arm\_upper} = \frac {1}… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative Evaluation on the People Snapshot dataset and of THuman dataset scan renderings. From a single-image input, SVAD generates high-quality, animatable 3D avatars. Given an input image I_s , global and local features F_{\text {local}} are extracted using a froz…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative Evaluation against SiTH [29]. Our ap￾proach better reconstructs complex contours and subtle features, resulting in a more lifelike and coherent side-view appearance. a) Input b) SiTH c) SVAD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative Evaluation against SiTH [29]. Our method reconstructs fine detail (hands), while preserving original identity in facial regions. to reach the optimal performance reflected by all the met￾rics. Using the THuman dataset, we apply the same eval￾uation techniqu…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative Evaluation against ExAvatar [68] in single￾image to 3D avatar task. Our method generates more plausible back and side views with the generated synthetic dataset. Method PSNR↑ SSIM↑ LPIPS↓ CLIP↑ PIFu [82] 15.62 0.8921 0.1903 0.8612 TeCH [38] 15.85 0.8892 0.1…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Ablation study on the identity preservation module. We show that with the module, the final avatar maintains facial details on the original input image. 5. Conclusion and Discussion In this work, we introduced SVAD, a novel synthetic data generation approach for creati…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Text to 3D Avatar. Our method enables the generation of animatable 3D avatars from text prompts. We show results for various textual descriptions processed through Flux-1 Dev [56] for image generation, followed by our single-image to 3D avatar pipeline. B. Application…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Text-Guided 3D Avatar Editing. Our framework enables semantic editing of 3D avatars using textual prompts. The resulting edited images are then processed by our single-image to 3D avatar pipeline, producing updated, animatable 3D avatars that reflect the specified tex…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Failure case of segmentation artifacts. When seg￾mentation fails to properly separate the subject from the back￾ground, residual background elements become embedded in the avatar. (a) Input (b) Legs Together (c) Legs Apart (d) Legs Apart [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Failure case of loose clothing deformation. Our method struggles with modeling loose garments like dresses due to limitations of the underlying parametric body model.” (a) Input (b) Avatar (c) Ground Truth (d) Avatar (Zoom in) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Failure case of back view synthesis. The inherently ill-posed nature of single-image 3D generation results in degraded quality for unseen viewpoints.” performance computing node equipped with an AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (128 logical cores) and an NVIDIA A100-SX…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: 3D Avatars from People Snapshot [2] dataset Our method successfully generates high-fidelity avatars for various subjects from a single input image, demonstrating robust identity preservation and consistent appearance across novel poses and viewpoints. x Zoom in for mo…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: 3D Avatars from People Snapshot [2] dataset. SVAD enables creation of detailed and expressive avatars from a single image, accurately reproducing clothing details and facial features while maintaining realism in different poses. x Zoom in for more details. 21 [PITH_F…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: 3D Avatars from the THuman [108] scan renderings. Our approach generalizes well to the THuman dataset, producing realistic avatars with high geometric and texture fidelity. x Zoom in for more details. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: 3D Avatars from Internet Images. SVAD demonstrates strong generalization capability to in-the-wild images, successfully reconstructing recognizable 3D avatars of various celebrities from single unconstrained photographs. The method preserves distinctive appearance cha…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Single-image 3d human digitization with shape-guided diffusion

    Badour AlBahar, Shunsuke Saito, Hung-Yu Tseng, Changil Kim, Johannes Kopf, and Jia-Bin Huang. Single-image 3d human digitization with shape-guided diffusion. In SIG- GRAPH Asia, 2023. 2

    2023

  2. [2]

    Video based reconstruc- tion of 3d people models

    Thiemo Alldieck, Marcus Magnor, Weipeng Xu, Christian Theobalt, and Gerard Pons-Moll. Video based reconstruc- tion of 3d people models. In CVPR, 2018. 3, 6, 7, 13, 20, 21

    2018

  3. [3]

    The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls.ACM TOMS,

    C Bradford Barber, David P Dobkin, and Hannu Huhdan- paa. The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls.ACM TOMS,

  4. [4]

    Person image synthesis via de- noising diffusion model

    Ankan Kumar Bhunia, Salman Khan, Hisham Cholakkal, Rao Muhammad Anwer, Jorma Laaksonen, Mubarak Shah, and Fahad Shahbaz Khan. Person image synthesis via de- noising diffusion model. In CVPR, 2023. 2

    2023

  5. [5]

    Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Andreas Blattmann, Robin Rombach, Huan Ling, Tim Dockhorn, Seung Wook Kim, Sanja Fidler, and Karsten Kreis. Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with latent diffusion models. In CVPR, 2023. 2

    2023

  6. [6]

    Yukang Cao, Yan-Pei Cao, Kai Han, Ying Shan, and Kwan- Yee K. Wong. Dreamavatar: Text-and-shape guided 3d human avatar generation via diffusion models. In CVPR,

  7. [7]

    Pega- sus: Personalized generative 3d avatars with composable attributes

    Hyunsoo Cha, Byungjun Kim, and Hanbyul Joo. Pega- sus: Personalized generative 3d avatars with composable attributes. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  8. [8]

    Perse: Per- sonalized 3d generative avatars from a single portrait

    Hyunsoo Cha, Inhee Lee, and Hanbyul Joo. Perse: Per- sonalized 3d generative avatars from a single portrait. In CVPR, 2025. 2

    2025

Show all 123 references
  1. [9]

    Everybody dance now

    Caroline Chan, Shiry Ginosar, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A Efros. Everybody dance now. In ICCV, 2019. 2, 3

    2019

  2. [10]

    Efficient geometry-aware 3d generative adversarial networks

    Eric R Chan, Connor Z Lin, Matthew A Chan, Koki Nagano, Boxiao Pan, Shalini De Mello, Orazio Gallo, Leonidas J Guibas, Jonathan Tremblay, Sameh Khamis, et al. Efficient geometry-aware 3d generative adversarial networks. In CVPR, 2022. 16

    2022

  3. [11]

    Ultraman: Single image 3d human reconstruction with ultra speed and detail

    Mingjin Chen, Junhao Chen, Xiaojun Ye, Huan-ang Gao, Xiaoxue Chen, Zhaoxin Fan, and Hao Zhao. Ultraman: Single image 3d human reconstruction with ultra speed and detail. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12028, 2024. 6, 7, 8

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Towards real-world blind face restoration with generative diffusion prior

    Xiaoxu Chen, Jingfan Tan, Tao Wang, Kaihao Zhang, Wen- han Luo, and Xiaochun Cao. Towards real-world blind face restoration with generative diffusion prior. IEEE TCSVT,

  5. [13]

    Mono- gaussianavatar: Monocular gaussian point-based head avatar

    Yufan Chen, Lizhen Wang, Qijing Li, Hongjiang Xiao, Shengping Zhang, Hongxun Yao, and Yebin Liu. Mono- gaussianavatar: Monocular gaussian point-based head avatar. In SIGGRAPH, 2024. 2

    2024

  6. [14]

    Meshavatar: Learning high-quality triangular human avatars from multi-view videos

    Yushuo Chen, Zerong Zheng, Zhe Li, Chao Xu, and Yebin Liu. Meshavatar: Learning high-quality triangular human avatars from multi-view videos. ECCV, 2024. 1, 2

    2024

  7. [15]

    Generalizable and an- imatable gaussian head avatar

    Xuangeng Chu and Tatsuya Harada. Generalizable and an- imatable gaussian head avatar. NeurIPS, 2024. 4, 14

    2024

  8. [16]

    3d u-net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation

    ¨Ozg¨un C ¸ ic ¸ek, Ahmed Abdulkadir, Soeren S Lienkamp, Thomas Brox, and Olaf Ronneberger. 3d u-net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In MICCAI, 2016. 3

    2016

  9. [17]

    Retinaface: Single-shot multi-level face localisation in the wild

    Jiankang Deng, Jia Guo, Evangelos Ververas, Irene Kotsia, and Stefanos Zafeiriou. Retinaface: Single-shot multi-level face localisation in the wild. In CVPR, 2020. 15

    2020

  10. [18]

    Headgas: Real-time animatable head avatars via 3d gaus- sian splatting

    Helisa Dhamo, Yinyu Nie, Arthur Moreau, Jifei Song, Richard Shaw, Yiren Zhou, and Eduardo P ´erez-Pellitero. Headgas: Real-time animatable head avatars via 3d gaus- sian splatting. In ECCV, 2025. 2

    2025

  11. [19]

    Diffusionrig: Learning personalized priors for facial appearance editing

    Zheng Ding, Xuaner Zhang, Zhihao Xia, Lars Jebe, Zhuowen Tu, and Xiuming Zhang. Diffusionrig: Learning personalized priors for facial appearance editing. In CVPR,

  12. [20]

    4d gaussian splatting: To- wards efficient novel view synthesis for dynamic scenes

    Yuanxing Duan, Fangyin Wei, Qiyu Dai, Yuhang He, Wen- zheng Chen, and Baoquan Chen. 4d gaussian splatting: To- wards efficient novel view synthesis for dynamic scenes. SIGGRAPH, 2024. 2

    2024

  13. [21]

    Learning an animatable detailed 3d face model from in-the-wild images

    Yao Feng, Haiwen Feng, Michael J Black, and Timo Bolkart. Learning an animatable detailed 3d face model from in-the-wild images. SIGGRAPH, 2021. 15

    2021

  14. [22]

    Stylegan-human: A data-centric odyssey of human genera- tion

    Jianglin Fu, Shikai Li, Yuming Jiang, Kwan-Yee Lin, Chen Qian, Chen Change Loy, Wayne Wu, and Ziwei Liu. Stylegan-human: A data-centric odyssey of human genera- tion. In ECCV, 2022. 2

    2022

  15. [23]

    Effi- cient ofdm channel estimation with rrdbnet

    Wei Gao, Meihong Yang, Wei Zhang, and Libin Liu. Effi- cient ofdm channel estimation with rrdbnet. In ISCC, 2022. 15

    2022

  16. [24]

    Digital Image Processing

    Rafael C Gonzalez and Richard E Woods. Digital Image Processing. Prentice Hall, 2008. 6

    2008

  17. [25]

    Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape

    Colin Goodall. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 1991. 14

    1991

  18. [26]

    Sparsectrl: Adding sparse controls to text-to-video diffusion models

    Yuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Anyi Rao, Maneesh Agrawala, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. Sparsectrl: Adding sparse controls to text-to-video diffusion models. ECCV, 2024. 3

    2024

  19. [27]

    Animatediff: Animate your personalized text- to-image diffusion models without specific tuning

    Yuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Anyi Rao, Zhengyang Liang, Yaohui Wang, Yu Qiao, Maneesh Agrawala, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. Animatediff: Animate your personalized text- to-image diffusion models without specific tuning. ICLR,

  20. [28]

    Learning locally editable virtual humans

    Hsuan-I Ho, Lixin Xue, Jie Song, and Otmar Hilliges. Learning locally editable virtual humans. In CVPR, 2023. 7

    2023

  21. [29]

    Sith: Single-view textured human reconstruction with image-conditioned dif- fusion

    I Ho, Jie Song, Otmar Hilliges, et al. Sith: Single-view textured human reconstruction with image-conditioned dif- fusion. In CVPR, 2024. 7, 8

    2024

  22. [30]

    Classifier-free diffusion guidance

    Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598, 2022. 3, 13

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Video dif- fusion models

    Jonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey Gritsenko, William Chan, Mohammad Norouzi, and David J Fleet. Video dif- fusion models. NeurIPS, 2022. 2, 13

    2022

  24. [32]

    Avatarclip: Zero-shot text- driven generation and animation of 3d avatars.SIGGRAPH,

    Fangzhou Hong, Mingyuan Zhang, Liang Pan, Zhongang Cai, Lei Yang, and Ziwei Liu. Avatarclip: Zero-shot text- driven generation and animation of 3d avatars.SIGGRAPH,

  25. [33]

    Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation

    Li Hu. Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation. InCVPR,

  26. [34]

    Gaussianavatar: Towards realistic human avatar modeling from a single video via animatable 3d gaussians

    Liangxiao Hu, Hongwen Zhang, Yuxiang Zhang, Boyao Zhou, Boning Liu, Shengping Zhang, and Liqiang Nie. Gaussianavatar: Towards realistic human avatar modeling from a single video via animatable 3d gaussians. In CVPR,

  27. [35]

    Sherf: Generalizable human nerf from a single image

    Shoukang Hu, Fangzhou Hong, Liang Pan, Haiyi Mei, Lei Yang, and Ziwei Liu. Sherf: Generalizable human nerf from a single image. In ICCV, 2023. 2

    2023

  28. [36]

    Gauhuman: Articu- lated gaussian splatting from monocular human videos

    Shoukang Hu, Tao Hu, and Ziwei Liu. Gauhuman: Articu- lated gaussian splatting from monocular human videos. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  29. [37]

    On the error analysis of 3d gaussian splatting and an optimal projection strategy

    Letian Huang, Jiayang Bai, Jie Guo, Yuanqi Li, and Yan- wen Guo. On the error analysis of 3d gaussian splatting and an optimal projection strategy. CoRR, 2024. 2

    2024

  30. [38]

    Tech: Text- guided reconstruction of lifelike clothed humans

    Yangyi Huang, Hongwei Yi, Yuliang Xiu, Tingting Liao, Jiaxiang Tang, Deng Cai, and Justus Thies. Tech: Text- guided reconstruction of lifelike clothed humans. In 3DV,

  31. [39]

    Splatarmor: Articulated gaussian splatting for animat- able humans from monocular rgb videos

    Rohit Jena, Ganesh Subramanian Iyer, Siddharth Choud- hary, Brandon Smith, Pratik Chaudhari, and James Gee. Splatarmor: Articulated gaussian splatting for animat- able humans from monocular rgb videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10812, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Avatarcraft: Transforming text into neural human avatars with parame- terized shape and pose control, 2023

    Ruixiang Jiang, Can Wang, Jingbo Zhang, Menglei Chai, Mingming He, Dongdong Chen, and Jing Liao. Avatarcraft: Transforming text into neural human avatars with parame- terized shape and pose control, 2023. 17

    2023

  33. [41]

    Humangen: Generating human radiance fields with explicit priors

    Suyi Jiang, Haoran Jiang, Ziyu Wang, Haimin Luo, Wen- zheng Chen, and Lan Xu. Humangen: Generating human radiance fields with explicit priors. In CVPR, 2023. 2

    2023

  34. [42]

    In- stantavatar: Learning avatars from monocular video in 60 seconds

    Tianjian Jiang, Xu Chen, Jie Song, and Otmar Hilliges. In- stantavatar: Learning avatars from monocular video in 60 seconds. In CVPR, 2023. 6

    2023

  35. [43]

    Rtmpose: Real- time multi-person pose estimation based on mmpose.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07399, 2023

    Tao Jiang, Peng Lu, Li Zhang, Ningsheng Ma, Rui Han, Chengqi Lyu, Yining Li, and Kai Chen. Rtmpose: Real- time multi-person pose estimation based on mmpose.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07399, 2023. 15

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Gaussian- shader: 3d gaussian splatting with shading functions for re- flective surfaces

    Yingwenqi Jiang, Jiadong Tu, Yuan Liu, Xifeng Gao, Xi- aoxiao Long, Wenping Wang, and Yuexin Ma. Gaussian- shader: 3d gaussian splatting with shading functions for re- flective surfaces. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  37. [45]

    Adaptive savitzky-golay filtering in non-gaussian noise

    Arlene John, Jishnu Sadasivan, and Chandra Sekhar Seela- mantula. Adaptive savitzky-golay filtering in non-gaussian noise. IEEE TSP, 2021. 14, 16

    2021

  38. [46]

    Belonging there: Vroom-ing into the uncanny valley of xr telepresence

    Brennan Jones, Yaying Zhang, Priscilla NY Wong, and Sean Rintel. Belonging there: Vroom-ing into the uncanny valley of xr telepresence. ACM HCI, 2021. 2

    2021

  39. [47]

    Dreampose: Fashion image-to-video synthesis via stable diffusion

    Johanna Karras, Aleksander Holynski, Ting-Chun Wang, and Ira Kemelmacher-Shlizerman. Dreampose: Fashion image-to-video synthesis via stable diffusion. In ICCV,

  40. [48]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM TOG, 2023. 2

    2023

  41. [49]

    Target-aware video diffu- sion models

    Taeksoo Kim and Hanbyul Joo. Target-aware video diffu- sion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18950, 2025. 2

    2025

  42. [50]

    Gala: Generating animatable layered assets from a single scan

    Taeksoo Kim, Byungjun Kim, Shunsuke Saito, and Han- byul Joo. Gala: Generating animatable layered assets from a single scan. In CVPR, 2024. 17

    2024

  43. [51]

    Dlib-ml: A machine learning toolkit

    Davis King. Dlib-ml: A machine learning toolkit. http: //dlib.net, 2009. 5, 14

    2009

  44. [52]

    Adam: A method for stochastic opti- mization

    Diederik P Kingma. Adam: A method for stochastic opti- mization. ICLR, 2015. 16

    2015

  45. [53]

    Segment anything

    Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer Whitehead, Alexander C Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, et al. Segment anything. In ICCV, 2023. 16, 18

    2023

  46. [54]

    Dreamhuman: Animatable 3d avatars from text

    Nikos Kolotouros, Thiemo Alldieck, Andrei Zanfir, Ed- uard Bazavan, Mihai Fieraru, and Cristian Sminchisescu. Dreamhuman: Animatable 3d avatars from text. NeurIPS,

  47. [55]

    Dynmf: Neural motion factorization for real-time dynamic view synthesis with 3d gaussian splatting

    Agelos Kratimenos, Jiahui Lei, and Kostas Daniilidis. Dynmf: Neural motion factorization for real-time dynamic view synthesis with 3d gaussian splatting. In ECCV, 2025. 2

    2025

  48. [56]

    Black Forest Labs. Flux. https://github.com/ black-forest-labs/flux, 2024. 17

    2024

  49. [57]

    Deblurring 3d gaussian splatting

    Byeonghyeon Lee, Howoong Lee, Xiangyu Sun, Usman Ali, and Eunbyung Park. Deblurring 3d gaussian splatting. ECCV, 2024. 2

    2024

  50. [58]

    Guess the unseen: Dynamic 3d scene reconstruction from partial 2d glimpses

    Inhee Lee, Byungjun Kim, and Hanbyul Joo. Guess the unseen: Dynamic 3d scene reconstruction from partial 2d glimpses. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  51. [59]

    Gart: Gaussian articulated template models

    Jiahui Lei, Yufu Wang, Georgios Pavlakos, Lingjie Liu, and Kostas Daniilidis. Gart: Gaussian articulated template models. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  52. [60]

    Learning a model of facial shape and ex- pression from 4d scans

    Tianye Li, Timo Bolkart, Michael J Black, Hao Li, and Javier Romero. Learning a model of facial shape and ex- pression from 4d scans. TOG, 2017. 5, 13

    2017

  53. [61]

    Animatable gaussians: Learning pose-dependent gaussian maps for high-fidelity human avatar modeling

    Zhe Li, Zerong Zheng, Lizhen Wang, and Yebin Liu. Animatable gaussians: Learning pose-dependent gaussian maps for high-fidelity human avatar modeling. In CVPR,

  54. [62]

    Tingting Liao, Hongwei Yi, Yuliang Xiu, Jiaxiang Tang, Yangyi Huang, Justus Thies, and Michael J. Black. TADA! Text to Animatable Digital Avatars. In International Con- ference on 3D Vision (3DV), 2024. 17

    2024

  55. [63]

    Common diffusion noise schedules and sample steps are flawed

    Shanchuan Lin, Bingchen Liu, Jiashi Li, and Xiao Yang. Common diffusion noise schedules and sample steps are flawed. In WACV, 2024. 3

    2024

  56. [64]

    Step1x-edit: A practi- cal framework for general image editing

    Shiyu Liu, Yucheng Han, Peng Xing, Fukun Yin, Rui Wang, Wei Cheng, Jiaqi Liao, Yingming Wang, Hong- hao Fu, Chunrui Han, et al. Step1x-edit: A practi- cal framework for general image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17761, 2025. 17

    2025 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Gaussianavatar-editor: Photore- alistic animatable gaussian head avatar editor

    Xiangyue Liu, Kunming Luo, Heng Li, Qi Zhang, Yuan Liu, Li Yi, and Ping Tan. Gaussianavatar-editor: Photore- alistic animatable gaussian head avatar editor. 3DV, 2025. 17

    2025

  58. [66]

    Dynamic 3d gaussians: Tracking by per- sistent dynamic view synthesis

    Jonathon Luiten, Georgios Kopanas, Bastian Leibe, and Deva Ramanan. Dynamic 3d gaussians: Tracking by per- sistent dynamic view synthesis. 3DV, 2024. 2 10

    2024

  59. [67]

    Accurate 3d hand pose estimation for whole-body 3d hu- man mesh estimation

    Gyeongsik Moon, Hongsuk Choi, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Accurate 3d hand pose estimation for whole-body 3d hu- man mesh estimation. In CVPR, 2022. 15

    2022

  60. [68]

    Expressive whole-body 3d gaussian avatar

    Gyeongsik Moon, Takaaki Shiratori, and Shunsuke Saito. Expressive whole-body 3d gaussian avatar. ECCV, 2024. 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 16

    2024

  61. [69]

    Human gaussian splatting: Real-time rendering of animatable avatars

    Arthur Moreau, Jifei Song, Helisa Dhamo, Richard Shaw, Yiren Zhou, and Eduardo P´erez-Pellitero. Human gaussian splatting: Real-time rendering of animatable avatars. In CVPR, 2024. 1

    2024

  62. [70]

    Laplacian mesh optimization

    Andrew Nealen, Takeo Igarashi, Olga Sorkine, and Marc Alexa. Laplacian mesh optimization. In GRAPHITE, 2006. 6

    2006

  63. [71]

    Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervi- sion

    Maxime Oquab, Timoth ´ee Darcet, Th ´eo Moutakanni, Huy V o, Marc Szafraniec, Vasil Khalidov, Pierre Fernandez, Daniel Haziza, Francisco Massa, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, et al. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervi- sion. TMLR, 2023. 5

    2023

  64. [72]

    Ash: Animatable gaus- sian splats for efficient and photoreal human rendering

    Haokai Pang, Heming Zhu, Adam Kortylewski, Christian Theobalt, and Marc Habermann. Ash: Animatable gaus- sian splats for efficient and photoreal human rendering. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  65. [73]

    Expressive body capture: 3d hands, face, and body from a single image

    Georgios Pavlakos, Vasileios Choutas, Nima Ghorbani, Timo Bolkart, Ahmed AA Osman, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J Black. Expressive body capture: 3d hands, face, and body from a single image. In CVPR, 2019. 6, 13, 16

    2019

  66. [74]

    Pois- son image editing

    Patrick P ´erez, Michel Gangnet, and Andrew Blake. Pois- son image editing. In Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2. Association for Computing Ma- chinery, 2023. 5, 14

    2023

  67. [75]

    Sm- plpix: Neural avatars from 3d human models

    Sergey Prokudin, Michael J Black, and Javier Romero. Sm- plpix: Neural avatars from 3d human models. In WACV,

  68. [76]

    Gaussianavatars: Photorealistic head avatars with rigged 3d gaussians

    Shenhan Qian, Tobias Kirschstein, Liam Schoneveld, Da- vide Davoli, Simon Giebenhain, and Matthias Nießner. Gaussianavatars: Photorealistic head avatars with rigged 3d gaussians. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  69. [77]

    3dgs-avatar: Animatable avatars via deformable 3d gaussian splatting

    Zhiyin Qian, Shaofei Wang, Marko Mihajlovic, Andreas Geiger, and Siyu Tang. 3dgs-avatar: Animatable avatars via deformable 3d gaussian splatting. In CVPR, 2024. 1, 2

    2024

  70. [78]

    Learn- ing transferable visual models from natural language super- vision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learn- ing transferable visual models from natural language super- vision. In ICML, 2021. 6, 13

    2021

  71. [79]

    Deep spa- tial transformation for pose-guided person image genera- tion and animation

    Yurui Ren, Ge Li, Shan Liu, and Thomas H Li. Deep spa- tial transformation for pose-guided person image genera- tion and animation. IEEE TIP, 2020. 2

    2020

  72. [80]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In CVPR, 2022. 6

    2022

  73. [81]

    U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation. In MICCAI, 2015. 3, 13

    2015

  74. [82]

    Pifu: Pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution clothed human digiti- zation

    Shunsuke Saito, Zeng Huang, Ryota Natsume, Shigeo Mor- ishima, Angjoo Kanazawa, and Hao Li. Pifu: Pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution clothed human digiti- zation. In ICCV, 2019. 7, 8

    2019

  75. [83]

    Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models

    Tim Salimans and Jonathan Ho. Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models. ICLR, 2022. 3

    2022

  76. [84]

    Neural re- rendering of humans from a single image

    Kripasindhu Sarkar, Dushyant Mehta, Weipeng Xu, Vladislav Golyanik, and Christian Theobalt. Neural re- rendering of humans from a single image. In ECCV, 2020. 2

    2020

  77. [85]

    mm-pose: Real-time human skeletal posture estima- tion using mmwave radars and cnns.IEEE Sensors Journal,

    Arindam Sengupta, Feng Jin, Renyuan Zhang, and Siyang Cao. mm-pose: Real-time human skeletal posture estima- tion using mmwave radars and cnns.IEEE Sensors Journal,

  78. [86]

    Splattingavatar: Realistic real-time human avatars with mesh-embedded gaussian splatting

    Zhijing Shao, Zhaolong Wang, Zhuang Li, Duotun Wang, Xiangru Lin, Yu Zhang, Mingming Fan, and Zeyu Wang. Splattingavatar: Realistic real-time human avatars with mesh-embedded gaussian splatting. In CVPR, 2024. 1, 2

    2024

  79. [87]

    X- avatar: Expressive human avatars

    Kaiyue Shen, Chen Guo, Manuel Kaufmann, Juan Jose Zarate, Julien Valentin, Jie Song, and Otmar Hilliges. X- avatar: Expressive human avatars. In CVPR, 2023. 1

    2023

  80. [88]

    First order motion model for image animation

    Aliaksandr Siarohin, St ´ephane Lathuili `ere, Sergey Tulyakov, Elisa Ricci, and Nicu Sebe. First order motion model for image animation. NeurIPS, 2019. 2

    2019

  81. [89]

    Motion representations for ar- ticulated animation

    Aliaksandr Siarohin, Oliver J Woodford, Jian Ren, Menglei Chai, and Sergey Tulyakov. Motion representations for ar- ticulated animation. In CVPR, 2021. 2

    2021

  82. [90]

    Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data

    Uriel Singer, Adam Polyak, Thomas Hayes, Xi Yin, Jie An, Songyang Zhang, Qiyuan Hu, Harry Yang, Oron Ashual, Oran Gafni, et al. Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792,

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Denois- ing diffusion implicit models

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denois- ing diffusion implicit models. ICLR, 2020. 3, 13

    2020

  84. [92]

    Laplacian surface editing

    Olga Sorkine, Daniel Cohen-Or, Yaron Lipman, Marc Alexa, Christian R ¨ossl, and H-P Seidel. Laplacian surface editing. In Eurographics, 2004. 6

    2004

  85. [93]

    Haha: Highly articulated gaussian human avatars with textured mesh prior

    David Svitov, Pietro Morerio, Lourdes Agapito, and Alessio Del Bue. Haha: Highly articulated gaussian human avatars with textured mesh prior. ACCV, 2024. 1, 2

    2024

  86. [94]

    Musepose: a pose-driven image-to-video framework for virtual human generation

    Zhengyan Tong, Chao Li, Zhaokang Chen, Bin Wu, and Wenjiang Zhou. Musepose: a pose-driven image-to-video framework for virtual human generation. arxiv, 2024. 2, 3, 13

    2024

  87. [95]

    Attention is all you need

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. NeurIPS,

  88. [96]

    Gaussianhead: Impressive 3d gaussian-based head avatars with dynamic hybrid neural field

    Jie Wang, Xianyan Li, Jiucheng Xie, Feng Xu, and Hao Gao. Gaussianhead: Impressive 3d gaussian-based head avatars with dynamic hybrid neural field. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2312, 2023. 2

    2023

  89. [97]

    Disco: Disentangled control for re- alistic human dance generation

    Tan Wang, Linjie Li, Kevin Lin, Yuanhao Zhai, Chung- Ching Lin, Zhengyuan Yang, Hanwang Zhang, Zicheng Liu, and Lijuan Wang. Disco: Disentangled control for re- alistic human dance generation. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  90. [98]

    Real-esrgan: Training real-world blind super-resolution with pure synthetic data

    Xintao Wang, Liangbin Xie, Chao Dong, and Ying Shan. Real-esrgan: Training real-world blind super-resolution with pure synthetic data. In ICCV, 2021. 15

    2021

  91. [99]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE TIP, 2004. 6 11

    2004

  92. [100]

    Structural similarity based image quality assessment

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, and Hamid R Sheikh. Structural similarity based image quality assessment. In Digital Video image quality and perceptual coding. CRC Press, 2017. 14

    2017

  93. [101]

    Affine transformation

    Eric W Weisstein. Affine transformation. https://mathworld. wolfram. com/, 2004. 14

    2004

  94. [102]

    Hu- mannerf: Free-viewpoint rendering of moving people from monocular video

    Chung-Yi Weng, Brian Curless, Pratul P Srinivasan, Jonathan T Barron, and Ira Kemelmacher-Shlizerman. Hu- mannerf: Free-viewpoint rendering of moving people from monocular video. In CVPR, 2022. 6, 7

    2022

  95. [103]

    The emergence of deepfake technology: A review

    Mika Westerlund. The emergence of deepfake technology: A review. Technology innovation management review , 9 (11), 2019. 19

    2019

  96. [104]

    Magicanimate: Temporally consistent human image animation using diffusion model

    Zhongcong Xu, Jianfeng Zhang, Jun Hao Liew, Han- shu Yan, Jia-Wei Liu, Chenxu Zhang, Jiashi Feng, and Mike Zheng Shou. Magicanimate: Temporally consistent human image animation using diffusion model. In CVPR,

  97. [105]

    Depth any- thing v2

    Lihe Yang, Bingyi Kang, Zilong Huang, Zhen Zhao, Xiao- gang Xu, Jiashi Feng, and Hengshuang Zhao. Depth any- thing v2. NeurIPS, 2024. 16

    2024

  98. [106]

    Ef- fective whole-body pose estimation with two-stages distil- lation

    Zhendong Yang, Ailing Zeng, Chun Yuan, and Yu Li. Ef- fective whole-body pose estimation with two-stages distil- lation. In ICCV, 2023. 3, 13, 15

    2023

  99. [107]

    Pose-guided human animation from a single image in the wild

    Jae Shin Yoon, Lingjie Liu, Vladislav Golyanik, Kri- pasindhu Sarkar, Hyun Soo Park, and Christian Theobalt. Pose-guided human animation from a single image in the wild. In CVPR, 2021. 2

    2021

  100. [108]

    Function4d: Real-time human vol- umetric capture from very sparse consumer rgbd sensors

    Tao Yu, Zerong Zheng, Kaiwen Guo, Pengpeng Liu, Qiong- hai Dai, and Yebin Liu. Function4d: Real-time human vol- umetric capture from very sparse consumer rgbd sensors. In CVPR, 2021. 6, 8, 19, 22

    2021

  101. [109]

    Bidirectionally deformable motion modulation for video-based human pose transfer

    Wing-Yin Yu, Lai-Man Po, Ray CC Cheung, Yuzhi Zhao, Yu Xue, and Kun Li. Bidirectionally deformable motion modulation for video-based human pose transfer. In ICCV,

  102. [110]

    Avatarbooth: High-quality and customizable 3d human avatar generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09864,

    Yifei Zeng, Yuanxun Lu, Xinya Ji, Yao Yao, Hao Zhu, and Xun Cao. Avatarbooth: High-quality and customizable 3d human avatar generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09864,

    arXiv

  103. [111]

    Rodinhd: High-fidelity 3d avatar generation with diffusion models

    Bowen Zhang, Yiji Cheng, Chunyu Wang, Ting Zhang, Jiaolong Yang, Yansong Tang, Feng Zhao, Dong Chen, and Baining Guo. Rodinhd: High-fidelity 3d avatar generation with diffusion models. ECCV, 2024. 17

    2024

  104. [112]

    Teca: Text-guided generation and editing of compositional 3d avatars

    Hao Zhang, Yao Feng, Peter Kulits, Yandong Wen, Justus Thies, and Michael J Black. Teca: Text-guided generation and editing of compositional 3d avatars. In 3DV, 2024. 17

    2024

  105. [113]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In ICCV, 2023. 2

    2023

  106. [114]

    Exploring dual-task correlation for pose guided person image generation

    Pengze Zhang, Lingxiao Yang, Jian-Huang Lai, and Xiao- hua Xie. Exploring dual-task correlation for pose guided person image generation. In CVPR, 2022. 2

    2022

  107. [115]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shecht- man, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In CVPR, 2018. 6

    2018

  108. [116]

    Sifu: Side- view conditioned implicit function for real-world usable clothed human reconstruction

    Zechuan Zhang, Zongxin Yang, and Yi Yang. Sifu: Side- view conditioned implicit function for real-world usable clothed human reconstruction. In CVPR, 2024. 7, 8

    2024

  109. [117]

    Thin-plate spline motion model for image animation

    Jian Zhao and Hui Zhang. Thin-plate spline motion model for image animation. In CVPR, 2022. 2

    2022

  110. [118]

    Path smoothing for five-axis machine tools using dual quaternion approximation with dominant points

    Xin Zhao, Huan Zhao, Xiangfei Li, and Han Ding. Path smoothing for five-axis machine tools using dual quaternion approximation with dominant points. IJPEM, 2017. 14

    2017

  111. [119]

    Gps- gaussian: Generalizable pixel-wise 3d gaussian splatting for real-time human novel view synthesis

    Shunyuan Zheng, Boyao Zhou, Ruizhi Shao, Boning Liu, Shengping Zhang, Liqiang Nie, and Yebin Liu. Gps- gaussian: Generalizable pixel-wise 3d gaussian splatting for real-time human novel view synthesis. In CVPR, 2024. 2

    2024

  112. [120]

    Physavatar: Learning the physics of dressed 3d avatars from visual observations

    Yang Zheng, Qingqing Zhao, Guandao Yang, Wang Yi- fan, Donglai Xiang, Florian Dubost, Dmitry Lagun, Thabo Beeler, Federico Tombari, Leonidas Guibas, and Gordon Wetzstein. Physavatar: Learning the physics of dressed 3d avatars from visual observations. In ECCV, 2024. 18

    2024

  113. [121]

    Physa- vatar: Learning the physics of dressed 3d avatars from vi- sual observations

    Yang Zheng, Qingqing Zhao, Guandao Yang, Wang Yi- fan, Donglai Xiang, Florian Dubost, Dmitry Lagun, Thabo Beeler, Federico Tombari, Leonidas Guibas, et al. Physa- vatar: Learning the physics of dressed 3d avatars from vi- sual observations. ECCV, 2024. 1, 2

    2024

  114. [122]

    Champ: Controllable and consistent human image animation with 3d parametric guidance

    Shenhao Zhu, Junming Leo Chen, Zuozhuo Dai, Yinghui Xu, Xun Cao, Yao Yao, Hao Zhu, and Siyu Zhu. Champ: Controllable and consistent human image animation with 3d parametric guidance. ECCV, 2024. 2

    2024

  115. [123]

    A woman with orange blouse and brown skirt

    Wojciech Zielonka, Timur Bagautdinov, Shunsuke Saito, Michael Zollh¨ofer, Justus Thies, and Javier Romero. Driv- able 3d gaussian avatars. 3DV, 2023. 2 12 A. Implementation Details In this section, we provide comprehensive technical details of SV AD. We first describe the pred...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.