Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 6 cited by

Extreme Loss Suppression and Wide Tunability of Dipolar Interactions in an Ultracold Molecular Gas

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dressing NaCs molecules with two microwave fields cuts two-body loss over 10,000-fold and three-body loss over 1,000-fold, with dipolar interactions tunable to 20,000 Bohr radii.

desk verdict The measured lifetime and loss suppression are solid and important; the wide-tunability claim needs a clean fix of the Supplementary Hamiltonian before it can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.08773 v1 pith:PL5TEMWO submitted 2025-05-13 cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atm-clusphysics.atom-phquant-ph

Weijun Yuan , Siwei Zhang , Niccolò Bigagli , Haneul Kwak , Claire Warner , Tijs Karman , Ian Stevenson , Sebastian Will This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atm-clusphysics.atom-phquant-ph PACS 67.85.-d
keywords ultracoldmoleculesmicrowaveshieldingdoubledressingdipolarinteractionscollisionallossesNaCslengthquantummany-bodyphases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that ultracold NaCs molecules in their rovibrational ground state, dressed by two microwave fields with $\pi$ and $\sigma^+$ polarization, almost stop colliding: two-body loss drops by more than a factor of 10,000 relative to undressed molecules, three-body loss by more than 1,000 relative to single microwave dressing, and the samples survive for several seconds at densities near $10^{12}$ per cubic centimeter. The same dressing that blocks the losses sets the strength of the long-range dipole-dipole force, so the dipolar length can be dialed continuously from zero to about 20,000 Bohr radii without leaving the low-loss window. If these results hold, molecular gases could finally combine the long lifetimes of atomic quantum gases with interactions strong enough to search for bulk quantum phases such as dipolar droplets, supersolids, and self-organized crystals.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the microwave-dressed three-level system: the rotational ground state $|0,0\rangle$ is coupled by a $\sigma^+$ field to $|1,1\rangle$ and by a $\pi$ field to $|1,0\rangle$, and the molecules are prepared in the highest-energy eigenstate $|s\rangle = \alpha|0,0\rangle + \beta|1,0\rangle + \gamma|1,1\rangle$. This state combines two opposing interaction channels — the $\pi$ admixture produces repulsive-in-plane 'dipolar' forces while the $\sigma^+$ admixture produces attractive-in-plane 'antidipolar' forces — whose balance is set by the Rabi-frequency ratio $\Omega_\pi/\Omega_\sigma$. The effective squared dipole moment $d_{\mathrm{ind}}^2 = d_0^2|\alpha|^2(2|\beta|^2 - |\gamma|^2)/3$ controls the dipolar length $a_d = m\,d_{\mathrm{ind}}^2/(4\pi\varepsilon_0\hbar^2)$, which vanishes when $|\gamma|^2 = 2|\beta|^2$. The same eigenstate carries a repulsive collisional barrier at an intermolecular distance near 2,500 $a_0$ that blocks short-range inelastic collisions, and coupled-channels calculations with absorbing boundary conditions predict the residual loss rates and the bound-state positions that mark the edges of the stability window.

What would settle it

Measure the two- and three-body loss coefficients with the $\pi$ field at the exact operating detuning ($\Delta_\pi/(2\pi) = 10$ MHz) while characterizing the $\pi$ field's $\sigma^+$ and $\sigma^-$ projections in situ at that same frequency; if $\beta_{2B}$ and $L_{3B}$ rise above the coupled-channels predictions for the measured residual polarization, or above the $10^{-13}$ cm$^3$/s and $10^{-25}$ cm$^6$/s detection floors, the assumed shielding barrier is too strong and the claimed tuning range must be revised inward.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the shielded eigenstate produced by double microwave dressing confers collisional stability and strong, tunable dipolar interactions simultaneously. With the $\sigma^+$ field fixed near $\Delta_\sigma/\Omega_\sigma = 1$, adding a $\pi$ field and varying the Rabi-frequency ratio $\Omega_\pi/\Omega_\sigma$ from 0.6 to 1.1 keeps two-body loss below the $10^{-13}$ cm$^3$/s detection floor and three-body loss near $2\times10^{-25}$ cm$^6$/s, while the effective dipole moment passes through zero at the compensation point $|\gamma|^2 = 2|\beta|^2$ and reaches dipolar lengths from $-21{,}000\,a_0$ (antidipolar) to $+12{,}000\,a_0$ (dipolar). Measured loss coefficients agree with coupled-channels calculations where they can be compared, and losses rise only where a bound state enters the dressed potential, opening a three-body recombination channel. At the projected maximal densities near $10^{15}$ cm$^{-3}$, the ratio of dipolar to kinetic energy $r_d = |a_d|/a_{sp}$ reaches 6.5, placing the system firmly in the strongly dipolar regime.

Load-bearing premise

The results assume the two microwave fields are almost perfectly pure in polarization and exactly perpendicular, but the polarization was calibrated at a $\pi$-field detuning about 2 MHz away from the operating point; if the residual $\sigma^+$ and $\sigma^-$ projections (bounded by $\sin 1^\circ$ and $\sin 4^\circ$ in Rabi frequency at calibration) are worse at the working detuning, the real shielding barrier is weaker than modeled and the usable tuning range shrinks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At densities near $10^{12}$ cm$^{-3}$, double-dressed NaCs samples live longer than 6 seconds, close to the 8.5-second one-body limit set by trap-laser scattering, so collisional loss no longer limits the sample lifetime.
  • Within the stability window $0.6 < \Omega_\pi/\Omega_\sigma < 1.1$, the dipolar length is continuously tunable from about $-21{,}000\,a_0$ to $+12{,}000\,a_0$, including the compensation point where the dipole-dipole interaction vanishes entirely.
  • Extrapolating the measured loss coefficients to a target lifetime of 100 ms gives maximal densities around $10^{15}$ cm$^{-3}$, comparable to atomic quantum gases, with the dipolar-to-kinetic-energy ratio $r_d$ reaching 6.5.
  • Because the shielding is set by the dressed eigenstate rather than a species-specific resonance, the same double-dressing scheme should transfer to other molecules with large electric dipole moments.
  • Together with the existing NaCs Bose-Einstein condensate, simultaneous stability and tunability open the route to strongly dipolar quantum liquids, droplets, supersolids, and self-organized dipolar crystals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The loss coefficients inside the stable window sit below the detection floor set by the one-body lifetime, so the quoted suppression factors of 10,000 and 1,000 are lower bounds; a trap with less laser scattering would reveal the true residual loss of double dressing.
  • The stability window ends where bound states enter the dressed potential, so varying the two-field frequency difference $\Delta_\pi - \Delta_\sigma$ should shift those bound states and could widen the low-loss window — a direct, testable extension of the reported tuning maps.
  • Near-total suppression of loss wherever no bound state exists suggests the same dressing pair can act as a fast on-off switch for collisions, letting experiments quench the shielding on microsecond timescales and watch a stable gas turn collisional.
  • If the residual-loss floor is as low as the detection limit suggests, evaporative cooling should reach degeneracy at strong dipolar interactions, not only at the $a_d = 0$ compensation point used for the NaCs condensate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports experiments on ultracold NaCs ground-state molecules in an optical dipole trap under double microwave dressing with both π and σ+ fields. The authors measure a sample lifetime of 6.6(5) s, close to the one-body limit of 8.5(1.5) s, and infer lower-bound suppression factors of more than 10,000 for two-body loss and more than 1,000 for three-body loss relative to undressed molecules. They further claim that the dipolar length can be continuously tuned from 0 to about 20,000 a0 (and to negative values down to -21,000 a0) across a stability window 0.6 < Ωπ/Ωσ < 1.1, and they project interaction-strength ratios rd up to 6.5 at densities that still permit a 100 ms lifetime. The experimental conclusions are based on direct decay measurements, fits to a kinetic model, and coupled-channels calculations; the quoted tuning range and stability boundaries are derived from a three-level dressed-state model.

Significance. The directly measured several-second lifetime and the honest reporting of suppression factors as lower bounds are significant experimental achievements for bulk ultracold molecular gases, as prior shielding demonstrations achieved only factors of 10 to 100. If the wide tunability and stability window are quantitatively correct, the work would open a realistic route to strongly dipolar many-body phases with molecules, and the projected rd values are compelling. The paper also uses a careful deep-trap method to suppress evaporative loss, spectral calibration of Rabi frequencies, and coupled-channels calculations that reproduce the measured loss rates where they can be compared. However, the tunability claim rests on model calculations whose printed Hamiltonian is internally inconsistent, and the calibration of the microwave polarization compensation is carried out away from the operating point; these issues must be resolved before the tuning range can be taken at face value.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary, 'Three-level V-system', Eq. (1)] The printed Hamiltonian matrix has the detunings interchanged: in the basis {|0,0>, |1,0>, |1,1>} the diagonal entries are -Δσ for |1,0> and -Δπ for |1,1>, whereas the main text (Fig. 1B) defines the π field (Rabi Ωπ) as coupling |0,0> to |1,0> with detuning Δπ and the σ+ field (Rabi Ωσ) as coupling |0,0> to |1,1> with detuning Δσ. As printed, the matrix cannot be the one used to obtain the dressed-state amplitudes β and γ that enter d_ind^2 = d0^2|α|^2(2|β|^2 - |γ|^2)/3, and hence all plotted ad values in Figs. 1D and 5A would be miscalculated. Please correct the matrix and explicitly confirm that the tuning curves and bound-state boundaries were computed with the correct assignment of Δπ and Δσ. Since no code or data is deposited, this correction is necessary for the reader to verify the central tunability claim.
  2. [Supplementary, 'Rabi frequencies, microwave ellipticities and orthogonality'] The compensation of the π-field projection onto the σ+ plane is calibrated at a π detuning about 2 MHz larger than the shielding value, and the residual projections are bounded only by sin(1°) and sin(4°) in Rabi frequency. The authors note that a frequency-dependent relative phase shift leaves uncertainty in the compensation quality at the precise dressing frequency. Because the dressed-state composition, the compensation point Ωπ/Ωσ ≈ 0.85, and the bound-state boundaries in Figs. 1D and 4 all depend on the purity of the microwave polarizations, this calibration uncertainty is load-bearing for the quoted stability window 0.6 < Ωπ/Ωσ < 1.1 and the ad tuning range. Please provide a quantitative sensitivity analysis (for example, recompute ad and the loss rates for residual projections within the stated bounds) or otherwise demonstrate that the calibration uncertainty does not alter the central tunability claims.
  3. [Supplementary, 'Kinetic model'] The density-dependent heating term En is introduced as a fitting parameter with no independent measurement or model (details are deferred to future work). The extracted two-body and three-body loss coefficients, which are compared with theory in Figs. 3 and 4 and used to compute nmax and rd in Fig. 5, may therefore carry a systematic uncertainty from this unconstrained term. Please show that the fitted β2B and L3B values are stable under reasonable variations of En, or include the resulting systematic error in the reported loss coefficients and in the projected densities and interaction ratios.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Fig. 5A] The abstract states the dipolar length can be tuned 'from 0 to 1 µm ∼ 20,000 a0', but Fig. 5A shows a range from -21,000 a0 to +12,000 a0; please state the full range including the negative (antidipolar) values, and use '≈' rather than '∼' for the unit conversion.
  2. [Main text, after Acknowledgments] The heading 'Data Vailability' contains a typo and should read 'Data Availability'.
  3. [Fig. 4B and related text] For 0.6 < Ωπ/Ωσ < 1.1 the three-body loss coefficient is quoted as 2(2) × 10^-25 cm^6/s, which is 'at or below our detection limit'; it would be clearer to report this as an upper bound rather than a central value with uncertainty.
  4. [Supplementary, Fig. S1 caption] The word 'significantly' is misspelled as 'significantly' (extra 'f'?); please check the spelling in the caption.
  5. [Main text, Fig. 1 caption and text] The notation for the Rabi frequency ratio appears as both 'Ωπ/Ωσ' and 'Ωπ/Ωσ' with inconsistent subscript formatting; please standardize the typography.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the headline loss suppression is measured, and the dipole-length tuning curve is a standard model prediction using measured inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claims — multi-second lifetime, >10,000-fold two-body and >1,000-fold three-body loss suppression, and the stability window 0.6 < Ωπ/Ωσ < 1.1 — are anchored in measured decay curves fit to a kinetic model with independent one-, two-, and three-body loss terms. The dipolar-length tuning curve (Figs. 1D and 5A) is computed from the standard expression d_ind² = d0²|α|²(2|β|²−|γ|²)/3 using spectroscopically measured Rabi frequencies and detunings; it is not fitted to the loss data, so the tuning claim does not reduce to its inputs. The coupled-channels calculations of bound-state positions and residual loss rates come from the same group's Ref. [38], but they are parameter-free, are checked against the measured single-dressing loss coefficients in the accessible regime, and do not take the measured lifetimes as input, so they constitute independent theoretical evidence rather than a self-citation shortcut. The supplement's stated calibration limitation ('optimization is performed for a π detuning that is ≈2 MHz larger than for shielding') and the apparent Δπ/Δσ interchange in the printed three-level Hamiltonian (Supplementary Eq. 1) are genuine verification and correctness caveats, but they do not make any claimed result equivalent to an input by construction. No self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, or uniqueness-imported step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's headline numbers rest on direct measurements (lifetime, molecule number) and on calculated quantities (dipolar length, bound-state positions, projected BEC density). The calculated quantities use a three-level dressed-state model, coupled-channels theory from the same group, and scaling assumptions for low temperature and BEC statistics. These are stated rather than hidden, but they are assumptions.

free parameters (1)
  • En (density-dependent heating parameter) = not quoted in the manuscript
    Added to the kinetic model to reproduce the observed temperature rise; fitted to decay data. The extracted beta_2B and L3B values depend on this model, so it is a genuine fitting parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Rotating-wave approximation and pure polarization for the two microwave fields in the three-level Hamiltonian (Supplementary Eq. S1)
    Used to compute dressed eigenstates and d_ind; the supplementary notes this is a simplified assumption and refers to a more detailed treatment including ellipticity.
  • domain assumption Coupled-channels rigid-rotor model with absorbing boundary condition at short range predicts two-body loss rates and bound-state positions
    The theoretical curves and stability-window boundaries in Figs. 3 and 4 come from the group's own preprint Ref. 38; the absorbing boundary models universal short-range loss.
  • domain assumption Temperature scaling L3B(T) ~ T^(7/6) and Thomas-Fermi suppression factors for BEC densities
    Used to project maximum density and rd values in Fig. 5 from measured finite-temperature loss coefficients.
  • domain assumption Universal two-body loss dominates short-range collisions in the absence of shielding
    Basis for comparing unshielded loss coefficient ~10^-9 cm^3/s.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Extreme Loss Suppression and Wide Tunability of Dipolar Interactions in an Ultracold Molecular Gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PL5TEMWO

@misc{pith2026250508773,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Extreme Loss Suppression and Wide Tunability of Dipolar Interactions in an Ultracold Molecular Gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PL5TEMWO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.08773}
}
abstract

Ultracold dipolar molecules hold great promise for the creation of novel quantum states of matter, but the realization of long-lived molecular bulk samples with strong dipole-dipole interactions has remained elusive. Here, we realize a collisionally stable gas of ultracold ground state molecules with a lifetime of several seconds. Utilizing double microwave dressing, we achieve an extreme suppression of inelastic two- and three-body losses by factors of more than 10,000 and 1,000, respectively. We find that losses remain suppressed across a wide range of dipole-dipole interactions, allowing the continuous tuning of the dipolar length from 0 to 1 um $\sim$ 20,000 $a_0$. Combined with the recent realization of Bose-Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules, our findings open the door to the exploration of strongly dipolar quantum liquids.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.08773 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A shows the interaction potentials of NaCs ground state molecules for three relevant dressing scenarios. Without mi￾crowave dressing, dipolar interactions are absent and short￾range interactions are strongly attractive, inducing univer￾sal two-body loss [25–27]. For single microwave dress￾ing with ∆σ /Ωσ = 1 and Ωπ /Ωσ = 0, the dipolar length is ad ∼ −40,000 a0 and molecules approaching each other initially experien… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tunable state-dependent interactions in collisionally stable mixtures of polar molecules

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Vibrational states v=0 and v=1 of microwave-shielded polar molecules form a collisionally stable pseudo-spin with tunable dipolar Ising, density-density, and spin-density interactions.

  2. Ro-vibrational van der Waals interaction between ultracold polar molecules

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Molecules in (v,j)=(0,1) and (1,0) feel a strong ro-vibrational van der Waals repulsion, C6=d_e^4/(9α_e), that can cut collisional loss by orders of magnitude.

  3. Bose-Einstein condensate of ultracold sodium-rubidium molecules with tunable dipolar interactions

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A BEC of 23Na87Rb molecules is created by dual microwave shielding, and tuning the dipolar interaction yields a gas-phase condensate and a candidate self-bound molecular quantum droplet.

  4. Tuning interactions between static-field-shielded polar molecules with microwaves

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding a microwave field to static-field-shielded CaF molecules allows the s-wave scattering length and dipole length to be tuned over wide ranges while keeping collisional losses low.

  5. Symmetry and Self-Bound Droplets in Dipolar Molecular Gases

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A D3 symmetry tiles the two-parameter interaction plane of microwave-dressed molecules, and this classification yields the phase diagram and scaling laws for self-bound molecular droplets.

  6. Strongly dipolar molecular Bose-Einstein condensates: From few- to many-body physics

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-12 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    Strongly dipolar molecular BECs push dipolar quantum-gas theory past the extended Gross–Pitaevskii limit, into regimes where quantum Monte Carlo predicts droplets, superfluid membranes, and Wigner crystals.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Störmer, and A. C. Gossard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559 (1982)

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    Y . Cao, V . Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxi- ras, and P . Jarillo-Herrero, Nature 556, 43 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Kapitza, Nature 141, 74 (1938)

    P . Kapitza, Nature 141, 74 (1938)

    work page 1938

  4. [4]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957)

    1957

  5. [5]

    Nozieres, Theory of quantum liquids: Superfluid bose liquids (CRC Press, 2018)

    P . Nozieres, Theory of quantum liquids: Superfluid bose liquids (CRC Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  7. [7]

    M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Science 269, 198 (1995)

    1995

  8. [8]

    K. B. Davis, M.-O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995)

    work page 1995

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Inouye, M

    S. Inouye, M. Andrews, J. Stenger, H.-J. Miesner, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Nature 392, 151 (1998)

    1998

  2. [10]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P . Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Science 357, 995 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Zwerger, The BCS-BEC crossover and the unitary Fermi gas, V ol

    W. Zwerger, The BCS-BEC crossover and the unitary Fermi gas, V ol. 836 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    Greiner, O

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Nature 415, 39 (2002)

    2002

  6. [14]

    Lahaye, T

    T. Lahaye, T. Koch, B. Fröhlich, M. Fattori, J. Metz, A. Gries- maier, S. Giovanazzi, and T. Pfau, Nature 448, 672 (2007)

    2007

  7. [15]

    Kadau, M

    H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, C. Wink, T. Maier, I. Ferrier- Barbut, and T. Pfau, Nature 530, 194 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Chomaz, S

    L. Chomaz, S. Baier, D. Petter, M. Mark, F. Wächtler, L. San- tos, and F. Ferlaino, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041039 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Chomaz, D

    L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P . Ilzhöfer, G. Natale, A. Trautmann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. V an Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, et al., Phys. Rev. X 9, 021012 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    M. Guo, F. Böttcher, J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, H. P . Büchler, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, Nature 574, 386 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Tanzi, S

    L. Tanzi, S. Roccuzzo, E. Lucioni, F. Famà, A. Fioretti, C. Gab- banini, G. Modugno, A. Recati, and S. Stringari, Nature 574, 382 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    M. A. Baranov, M. Dalmonte, G. Pupillo, and P . Zoller, Chem. Rev. 112, 5012 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Y e, Science 357, 1002 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Ciardi, K

    M. Ciardi, K. R. Pedersen, T. Langen, and T. Pohl, arXiv:2504.02682 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    H. P . Büchler, E. Demler, M. Lukin, A. Micheli, N. Prokof’ev, G. Pupillo, and P . Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 060404 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    Góral, L

    K. Góral, L. Santos, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 170406 (2002)

    2002

  17. [25]

    Ospelkaus, K.-K

    S. Ospelkaus, K.-K. Ni, D. Wang, M. De Miranda, B. Neyen- huis, G. Quéméner, P . Julienne, J. Bohn, D. Jin, and J. Y e, Science 327, 853 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    P . S. Julienne, T. M. Hanna, and Z. Idziaszek, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 19114 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    Bause, A

    R. Bause, A. Christianen, A. Schindewolf, I. Bloch, and X.-Y . Luo, J. Phys. Chem. A 127, 729 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    V altolina, K

    G. V altolina, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, J.-R. Li, L. De Marco, and J. Y e, Nature588, 239 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Matsuda, L

    K. Matsuda, L. De Marco, J.-R. Li, W. G. Tobias, G. V altolina, G. Quéméner, and J. Y e, Science 370, 1324 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Anderegg, S

    L. Anderegg, S. Burchesky, Y . Bao, S. S. Y u, T. Karman, E. Chae, K.-K. Ni, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Science 373, 779 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Schindewolf, R

    A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, X.-Y . Chen, M. Duda, T. Karman, I. Bloch, and X.-Y . Luo, Nature 607, 677 (2022)

    2022

  24. [33]

    J. Lin, G. Chen, M. Jin, Z. Shi, F. Deng, W. Zhang, G. Quéméner, T. Shi, S. Yi, and D. Wang, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031032 (2023)

    2023

  25. [35]

    Gorshkov, P

    A. Gorshkov, P . Rabl, G. Pupillo, A. Micheli, P . Zoller, M. Lukin, and H. Büchler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 073201 (2008)

    2008

  26. [37]

    Z. Z. Y an, J. W. Park, Y . Ni, H. Loh, S. Will, T. Karman, and M. Zwierlein, Phys. Rev. Lett 125, 063401 (2020)

    2020

  27. [39]

    F. Deng, X. Hu, W.-J. Jin, S. Yi, and T. Shi, arXiv:2501.05210 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  28. [40]

    See Supplementary Information for details

  29. [41]

    Here, m denotes the molecular mass and ¯h the reduced Planck constant

    and the associated characteristic length scale, the dipo- lar length, ad = md2 ind/(4 πε 0 ¯h2) [20, 23], are determined by the composition of the shielded eigenstate. Here, m denotes the molecular mass and ¯h the reduced Planck constant. The dipolar length can be widely tuned...

  30. [42]

    The definition of dind via the interaction energy formally leads to real (imaginary) val- ues for the case of dipolar (antidipolar) interactions

    The factor of 2 in front of | β |2 arises from π interactions being twice as strong as σ + interactions [53]. The definition of dind via the interaction energy formally leads to real (imaginary) val- ues for the case of dipolar (antidipolar) interactions

  31. [44]

    Weber, J

    T. Weber, J. Herbig, M. Mark, H.-C. Nägerl, and R. Grimm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 123201 (2003)

    2003

  32. [45]

    Avdeenkov and J

    A. Avdeenkov and J. L. Bohn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 043006 (2003)

    2003

  33. [46]

    X.-Y . Chen, S. Biswas, S. Eppelt, A. Schindewolf, F. Deng, T. Shi, S. Yi, T. A. Hilker, I. Bloch, and X.-Y . Luo, Nature 626, 283 (2024)

    2024

  34. [48]

    Dajun Wang, private communication

  35. [49]

    Langen, J

    T. Langen, J. Boronat, J. Sánchez-Baena, R. Bombín, T. Kar- man, and F. Mazzanti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 053001 (2025)

    2025

  36. [50]

    Zhang, K

    W. Zhang, K. Chen, S. Yi, and T. Shi, arXiv:2503.02644 (2025). 7

    2025 arXiv

  37. [51]

    Mitra, C

    K. Mitra, C. Williams, and C. de Melo, arXiv:0903.4655 (2009)

    2009 arXiv

  38. [52]

    Cinti, T

    F. Cinti, T. Macrì, W. Lechner, G. Pupillo, and T. Pohl, Nat. Commun. 5, 3235 (2014)

    2014

  39. [53]

    Sánchez-Baena, C

    J. Sánchez-Baena, C. Politi, F. Maucher, F. Ferlaino, and T. Pohl, Nat. Commun. 14, 1868 (2023)

    2023

  40. [54]

    Extreme Loss Suppression and Wide Tunability of Dipolar Interactions in an Ultracold Molecular Gas

    T. Karman, Z. Z. Y an, and M. Zwierlein, Phys. Rev. A 105, 013321 (2022). Supplementary Material for “Extreme Loss Suppression and Wide Tunability of Dipolar Interactions in an Ultracold Molecular Gas” Weijun Y uan,1, ∗ Siwei Zhang, 1, ∗ Niccolò Bigagli, 1 Haneul Kwak, 1 Clair...

    2022

  41. [55]

    pick the relative phase and amplitude of π c1 and π c2,

  42. [56]

    minimize π σ − with the π x-π c phase and π c global am- plitude, and

  43. [57]

    photon number

    measure π σ + . At the end, we pick the π c1-π c2 parameters that best mini- mize π σ + and π σ − . Our estimate is that, in terms of Rabi frequencies, we achieved |π σ − | < sin (1◦)|π π | and |π σ +| < sin (4◦)|π π |. The main limitation of this technique is that the optimiz...

  44. [58]

    Here, n0 = N ¯ω 3[m/(2π kBT )]3/2 is the peak density ( ¯ω is the mean trap frequency, m is the mass of the molecule)

    and the related energy change ˙E2B = −(3/4)β 2Bn0E/(2 √ 2). Here, n0 = N ¯ω 3[m/(2π kBT )]3/2 is the peak density ( ¯ω is the mean trap frequency, m is the mass of the molecule). The number loss due to three-body loss is given by ˙N3B = −L3Bn2 0N/(3 √

  45. [59]

    The effect of evaporative loss is summarized by ˙Nev = −Nν (η )Γ th [16, 17]

    and the corresponding en- ergy change is given by ˙E3B = −(2/3)L3Bn2 0E/(3 √ 3). The effect of evaporative loss is summarized by ˙Nev = −Nν (η )Γ th [16, 17]. Here, v(η ) = ( 2 + 2η + η 2)/(2eη ) is the ratio of elastically scattered molecules with kinetic energy larger than t...

  46. [60]

    Here, ˙Tc is a constant one-body heating rate which likely results from mechanical shaking of the dipole trap

    well describes the experimentally observed increment of the tem- perature. Here, ˙Tc is a constant one-body heating rate which likely results from mechanical shaking of the dipole trap. This value is fixed to 8(2) nK/s obtained from measuring the tem- perature evolution of cesi...

  47. [61]

    Details on density- dependent heating will be reported in future work [18]

    describes a density dependent heating process parameterized by a fitting parameter En. Details on density- dependent heating will be reported in future work [18]. Projected maximum density. The maximum density in Fig. 5 is determined as follows: For a given two-body loss coeffic...

  48. [62]

    A. Z. Lam, N. Bigagli, C. Warner, W. Y uan, S. Zhang, E. Tie- mann, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L022019 (2022)

    2022

  49. [63]

    W. B. Cairncross, J. T. Zhang, L. R. B. Picard, Y . Y u, K. Wang, and K.-K. Ni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 123402 (2021)

    2021

  50. [64]

    Stevenson, A

    I. Stevenson, A. Z. Lam, N. Bigagli, C. Warner, W. Y uan, S. Zhang, and S. Will, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 113022 (2023)

    2023

  51. [65]

    Warner, N

    C. Warner, N. Bigagli, A. Z. Lam, W. Y uan, S. Zhang, I. Steven- son, and S. Will, New J. Phys. 25, 053036 (2023)

    2023

  52. [66]

    P . J. Dagdigian and L. Wharton, J. Chem. Phys. 57, 1487 (1972)

    1972

  53. [67]

    Aymar and O

    M. Aymar and O. Dulieu, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 204302 (2005)

    2005

  54. [68]

    Y uan, S

    W. Y uan, S. Zhang, N. Bigagli, C. Warner, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 94, 123201 (2023)

    2023

  55. [69]

    Zhang, W

    S. Zhang, W. Y uan, N. Bigagli, C. Warner, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 263401 (2024)

    2024

  56. [71]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Y uan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Nature 631, 289 (2024)

    2024

  57. [72]

    Karman, N

    T. Karman, N. Bigagli, W. Y uan, S. Zhang, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, arXiv:2501.08095 (2025)

    2025

  58. [73]

    D. T. Colbert and W. H. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 1982 (1992)

    1992

  59. [74]

    Karman and J

    T. Karman and J. M. Hutson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 163401 (2018)

    2018

  60. [75]

    Bigagli, C

    N. Bigagli, C. Warner, W. Y uan, S. Zhang, I. Stevenson, T. Kar- man, and S. Will, Nat. Phys. 19, 1579 (2023)

    2023

  61. [76]

    Stevenson, S

    I. Stevenson, S. Singh, A. Elkamshishy, N. Bigagli, W. Y uan, S. Zhang, C. H. Greene, and S. Will, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 263402 (2024)

    2024

  62. [77]

    Luiten, M

    O. Luiten, M. Reynolds, and J. Walraven, Phys. Rev. A 53, 381 (1996)

    1996

  63. [78]

    A. J. Olson, R. J. Niffenegger, and Y . P . Chen, Phys. Rev. A 87, 053613 (2013)

    2013

  64. [79]

    Stevenson et al., (in preparation) (2025)

    I. Stevenson et al., (in preparation) (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.