Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 64 references

Illuminating Very Heavy Dark Matter in the Earth with Tau Neutrinos

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tau-neutrino regeneration lets TeV–PeV neutrino telescopes see dark matter annihilating in Earth's core up to 10^10 GeV, and 7.5 years of IceCube data already set 90% limits on the cross section.

desk verdict A useful, well-scoped paper that opens a new mass window for Earth-capture DM searches via tau regeneration, but the signal acceptance calculation has a directional-substitution issue that needs a closure test before the limits can be taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09673 v1 pith:WIKIGFVP submitted 2025-05-14 hep-ph astro-ph.HE

Tianyi Ding , Ali Kheirandish , Qinrui Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.HE
keywords tauneutrinoregenerationveryheavydarkmatterEarthcorecaptureindirectsearchIceCubehigh-energystartingeventsspin-independentmatter-nucleoncrosssectionleptonannihilationchannelstelescopes
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's claim is that tau neutrino regeneration removes the usual ~PeV opacity barrier for indirect dark matter searches in Earth, because a very high energy $\nu_\tau$ interacting in the Earth produces a short-lived $\tau$ that decays back into neutrinos rather than being absorbed. As a result, neutrino telescopes operating at TeV–PeV energies can look for dark matter with masses from 100 TeV to 10 EeV ($10^5$–$10^{10}$ GeV) annihilating in Earth's core into $\tau^+\tau^-$ or $\nu_\tau\bar\nu_\tau$. Using 7.5 years of IceCube high-energy starting events, the paper reports 90% confidence upper limits on the spin-independent dark matter-nucleon cross section in that mass range, a region where the Earth is opaque to all other neutrino flavors. The takeaway is that the tau channel turns a supposedly blind energy window into an observable one, and existing public data already place new bounds in this regime.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is tau regeneration, implemented through the transport equation $\frac{d\vec{\phi}(E,x)}{dx} = -\sigma(E)\vec{\phi}(E,x) + \int_E^\infty d\tilde E\, f(\tilde E,E)\vec{\phi}(\tilde E,x)$, where the redistribution kernel $f$ includes neutral-current down-scattering and the decay of taus produced by charged-current interactions. The initial annihilation spectra are fed into a Monte Carlo propagation code that tracks taus and neutrinos through a layered Earth density profile with a 3 km water-ice layer at the surface. The propagated surface flux is then folded with detector effective areas and event-morphology probabilities to produce expected cascade and double-cascade counts, which enter a binned Poisson likelihood.

What would settle it

Recompute the signal event rate for the same event sample using the up-going effective areas and detector responses rather than the down-going ones; if the resulting 90% confidence cross-section limits move by more than the Monte Carlo statistical uncertainty, the quoted limits depend on that substitution and would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that tau regeneration converts an otherwise unobservable ultra-high-energy signal into a lower-energy, detectable one: $\nu_\tau \to \tau \to \nu_\tau$ (plus other decay products) repeatedly shifts energy downward as the flux crosses the Earth, so the surface spectrum at TeV–PeV energies retains a signal even when the primary dark matter mass is $10^{10}$ GeV. For both annihilation channels considered, $\tau^+\tau^-$ and $\nu_\tau\bar\nu_\tau$, the paper obtains 90% confidence upper limits on the spin-independent dark matter-nucleon cross section over $10^5$–$10^{10}$ GeV using the 7.5-year HESE event sample. For masses above $10^7$ GeV the two channel limits converge; below that, the $\tau^+\tau^-$ channel gives a somewhat weaker limit because taus lose energy to photonuclear interactions in the Earth's core before they can decay.

Load-bearing premise

The signal rate is computed with the detector response for down-going events even though the dark matter neutrinos arrive from below, on the ground that propagation through Earth is already included in the flux; the paper does not show that the two detector responses are interchangeable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Earth-core dark matter searches no longer need to stop at about 1 PeV; if annihilation produces taus, masses up to $10^{10}$ GeV are within reach of existing TeV–PeV neutrino telescopes.
  • Because the limits are set on the annihilation rate and then converted to the spin-independent scattering cross section, the result directly constrains the dark matter-nucleon interaction strength in a mass range far above direct-detection experiments.
  • For $m_\chi > 10^7$ GeV, the $\tau^+\tau^-$ and $\nu_\tau\bar\nu_\tau$ channels give nearly identical limits, so the high-mass bound does not depend strongly on which tau-related channel dominates.
  • Selecting cascade plus double-cascade events strengthens the upper limit by about 17% compared with using all event morphologies, and a dedicated double-cascade search would add a nearly background-free tau signature.
  • Scaling instrumented volume to a next-generation detector improves the projected limit by roughly a factor of 3 before including better event reconstruction, so the approach is expected to tighten with future telescopes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same tau-regeneration argument should apply to other high-density dark matter reservoirs, such as the Sun or the Galactic center, where neutrino searches also hit the PeV opacity ceiling; extending this Earth-core analysis to those targets would test how general the effect is.
  • A direct check of the down-going versus up-going detector-response substitution could be made by recomputing the signal with up-going effective areas; if the resulting limits shift materially, the quoted bounds are analysis-dependent rather than physics-driven.
  • The near-zero double-cascade background suggests that a targeted search for tau-neutrino double cascades in the full sky might be the most sensitive route at the highest masses; the paper mentions double-cascade analyses as future work but does not perform that search.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that neutrino telescopes can probe very heavy dark matter (DM) annihilating inside the Earth, provided the DM annihilates to tau neutrinos or tau leptons, because tau regeneration mitigates Earth opacity at energies above ~PeV. Using the public codes chiaroNu and TauRunner, the authors compute the capture rate in the Earth, the annihilation rate, and the propagated neutrino flux for DM masses between 10^5 and 10^10 GeV in the tau+tau- and nu_tau anti-nu_tau channels. They then use 7.5 years of IceCube HESE data, selecting up-going cascade and double-cascade events, and construct a binned Poisson likelihood to set 90% CL upper limits on the annihilation rate and on the spin-independent DM-nucleon cross section. The central quantitative result is a set of upper limits on sigma_SI extending to very heavy DM masses, together with a projection for IceCube-Gen2.

Significance. The qualitative idea is attractive and potentially important: if tau regeneration allows Earth-capture searches to reach DM masses beyond the PeV scale, neutrino telescopes could provide a new probe of ultra-heavy DM. The use of public, community-developed codes (chiaroNu, TauRunner) and public HESE data is a strength, as is the explicit comparison with other Earth-capture and direct-detection limits. The projected Gen2 sensitivity, while based on simplified volume scaling, is a useful outlook. However, the numerical upper limits in Figure 7 rely on a non-standard directional substitution in the event rate calculation and on a background fixed to best-fit values without propagated uncertainties. As presented, the central quantitative claim is not yet fully supported; the paper is a promising proof-of-concept that requires a more careful detector-response treatment.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, paragraph beginning 'To calcualte the number of signal events'] The signal event rate is computed using the down-going HESE MC selection, while the background uses the up-going effective area. This directional substitution is not justified. The DM signal originates from the Earth's core, i.e. from the nadir (up-going) direction, and the HESE veto and reconstruction efficiencies are direction- and zenith-dependent. No closure test is provided to show that the down-going and up-going effective areas for cascade and double-cascade events are identical over the relevant true-energy and deposited-energy ranges (roughly 10 TeV to 1 EeV). If the down-going acceptance is larger (for example because the outer veto suppresses fewer down-going neutrino events), the signal expectation is overestimated and the resulting upper limits in Figure 7 become artificially strong. The authors should either perform a consistent calculation (e.g., use the up-going MC response with the un-attenuated production flux and let the MC handle Earth propagation, or demonstrate explicitly that the two effective-area choices give identical signal expectations) and estimate the shift in the limits.
  2. [Section 4, Eq. (4.1)] The background is fixed to the IceCube HESE best-fit astrophysical flux (normalization 6.37 and spectral index 2.87) and to the best-fit atmospheric parameters, with no nuisance parameters in the likelihood. The published uncertainties on the spectral index (gamma = 2.87 +0.20/-0.19) and normalization are therefore not propagated into the 90% CL limits on the DM annihilation rate and sigma_SI. Since the DM signal overlaps with the astrophysical neutrino background in energy and flavor, this can underestimate the uncertainties in the quoted upper limits. The authors should either profile or marginalize over the background parameters (with appropriate priors or penalty terms) or demonstrate that the limits are robust against the allowed range of background parameters.
  3. [Section 4, Eq. (4.4)] The test statistic is assumed to follow a chi-squared distribution with one degree of freedom by applying Wilks's theorem. This is problematic because the parameter of interest, Gamma_ann, is non-negative and the null hypothesis Gamma_ann = 0 lies on the boundary of the parameter space, so the standard regularity conditions are not met. In addition, the sample is small (15 up-going cascade events), so the asymptotic approximation may be poor. The 90% CL threshold TS >= 2.71 should be validated with Monte Carlo pseudo-experiments or a boundary-corrected distribution. If the threshold changes, the upper limits in Figures 7 and 10 would shift correspondingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4, paragraph beginning 'To calcualte the number of signal events'] There is a typo: 'To calcualte' should be 'To calculate'.
  2. [Figure 3 caption] The caption repeats a sentence fragment: 'This initial flux serves as the input for near each peak denote the assumed DM particle mass. This initial flux serves as the input for propagation simulations...' The duplicated text should be removed.
  3. [Section 2, paragraph on chiaroNu] The description of the modification to chiaroNu ('we need to modify current chiaroNu by turning off the decay of tau') is vague. Please provide a more precise account of what was changed and how the modified initial flux was validated.
  4. [Section 6] The statement that the tau regeneration effect is 'emphasized for the first time' in this context should be checked against Ref. [40] and related literature, which also consider neutrinos from Earth-bound DM annihilation and may already include tau regeneration; if not, the novelty claim should be sharpened by explaining the difference.
  5. [Figure 7] The extrapolation of the LZ and PandaX-4T limits from m_chi = 10^4 GeV to 10^10 GeV should state the assumptions used (halo model, form factor, and scattering kinematics), since extrapolating direct-detection limits far beyond the experimentally covered mass range can be misleading.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DM flux prediction and IceCube limit stem from independent public codes and a binned likelihood against public HESE data.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The initial DM annihilation spectra are generated with the public chiaroNu code [58] and PYTHIA 8.2, then propagated with TauRunner [61]; neither code is tuned to produce the quoted limits, and the propagation physics (tau regeneration) is independently implemented in several public codes cited in Sec. 3. The signal event expectation is obtained by folding the propagated flux with the public HESE MC response, and the limits are derived from a Poisson binned likelihood (Eq. 4.3) against the observed 7.5-year HESE event counts. The background uses IceCube's published best-fit astrophysical and atmospheric fluxes from the same public dataset; using published best-fit background parameters is a standard limit-setting practice and does not make the DM signal prediction an input to itself. The only author-overlapping citation is chiaroNu [58], used as a flux-generation tool rather than as a uniqueness or exclusion argument, so it is not load-bearing in a circular sense. The directional substitution of down-going HESE MC for signal acceptance (Sec. 4) is a detector-response validity concern, not a circularity, because the signal expectation is not defined in terms of the observed up-going counts. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no result is forced by self-citation or by definition. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central limit is a data-driven upper bound. It rests on standard dark matter capture and annihilation physics, on public propagation codes, and on IceCube's published background model. The main fitted inputs are the astrophysical and atmospheric background parameters taken from the HESE 7.5-year analysis. No new particles or forces are introduced. The assumptions are all standard for this class of analysis, though the detector-response substitution (down-going MC for signal) is a nonstandard modeling choice that deserves validation.

free parameters (3)
  • Astrophysical neutrino flux normalization = 6.37e-18 GeV^-1 cm^-2 s^-1 sr^-1
    From IceCube HESE 7.5-year best fit, Eq. (4.1); fixed in the likelihood, so the limits depend on this value.
  • Astrophysical neutrino spectral index = 2.87
    From IceCube HESE 7.5-year best fit, Eq. (4.1); fixed in the analysis.
  • Atmospheric neutrino background parameters = Not specified numerically
    Adopted from the HESE 7.5-year analysis (Ref. [67]); used to compute the atmospheric background event counts.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Dark matter is self-annihilating (e.g., Majorana) and capture/annihilation equilibrium is reached, so the annihilation rate Gamma_a = C/2 tanh^2(t sqrt(C A)).
    Sec. 2 Eq. (2.2); needed to convert the fitted annihilation rate into a cross-section limit.
  • domain assumption Single-scatter capture regime applies for the cross sections considered in this work.
    Sec. 2 before Eq. (2.5); the paper states capture is below the geometric limit so single-scatter capture is valid.
  • domain assumption Local dark matter density rho_chi = 0.42 GeV/cm^3 and velocity dispersion v_chi = 270 km/s.
    Sec. 2, after Eq. (2.6); standard halo parameters used in the capture rate.
  • domain assumption The thermally averaged annihilation cross section benchmark <sigma v> = 3e-26 cm^3/s is used when presenting limits in the <sigma v>-sigma_SI plane.
    Sec. 5 and Fig. 8; this is the canonical thermal relic value, not measured in this work.
  • standard math Wilks' theorem applies to the test statistic, which is assumed to follow a chi^2 distribution with one degree of freedom.
    Sec. 4, Eq. (4.4); regularity conditions are stated but not verified for the low-count, bounded parameter case.
  • domain assumption The TauRunner propagation code accurately models tau regeneration, energy losses, and column density using the PREM profile.
    Sec. 3; the entire surface flux calculation depends on this public Monte Carlo code.
  • domain assumption The initial annihilation spectra from chiaroNu with Pythia 8.2 electroweak showering adequately represent the tau and nu_tau fluxes at masses up to 10^10 GeV without the HDMSpectra electroweak corrections.
    Sec. 2, paragraph on flux generation; the authors note they do not use the HDMSpectra intermediate results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Illuminating Very Heavy Dark Matter in the Earth with Tau Neutrinos." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WIKIGFVP

@misc{pith2026250509673,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Illuminating Very Heavy Dark Matter in the Earth with Tau Neutrinos},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WIKIGFVP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09673}
}
abstract

Dark matter accumulates in the center of the Earth as the planet plows through the dark matter halo in the Milky Way. Possible annihilation of dark matter to Standard Model particles can be probed in indirect dark matter searches. Among possible messengers, neutrinos are uniquely ideal as they can escape dense regions. Therefore, neutrino telescopes, with their large volume and broad energy exposures, offer new opportunities to search for dark matter signals from the center of the Earth. However, such studies have been restricted to dark matter masses below $\sim$ PeV as the Earth becomes opaque to very-high-energy neutrinos. In this study, we demonstrate that neutrino telescopes operating at TeV-PeV energies can probe very heavy dark matter particles if they annihilate to tau neutrinos or tau leptons. Here, we report upper limits on the spin-independent dark matter-nucleon cross section for masses between $10^5$ GeV and $10^{10}$ GeV by using 7.5 years of IceCube high-energy starting event observations. Our results motivate detailed analyses in IceCube and other upcoming neutrino telescopes in the Northern Hemisphere.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

    arXiv 2005

  2. [3]

    V. C. Rubin, N. Thonnard and W. K. Ford, Jr.,Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 /R = 4kpc/ to UGC 2885 /R = 122 kpc/,Astrophys. J.238(1980) 471. – 13 –

    work page 1980

  3. [4]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones et al., A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter,Astrophys. J. Lett.648(2006) L109 [astro-ph/0608407]. [5]WMAPcollaboration,First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Determination of cosmological parameters,Astrophys. J. Suppl.148 (2003) ...

    arXiv 2006

  4. [6]

    Roszkowski, E

    L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo and S. Trojanowski,WIMP dark matter candidates and searches—current status and future prospects,Rept. Prog. Phys.81(2018) 066201 [1707.06277]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [7]

    Schumann,Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status,J

    M. Schumann,Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status,J. Phys. G46(2019) 103003 [1903.03026]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [8]

    M. W. Goodman and E. Witten,Detectability of Certain Dark Matter Candidates, Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 3059. [9]XENONcollaboration,First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 041003 [2303.14729]. [10]PANDA-X, PandaXcollaboration,PandaX-xT—A deep underground multi-ten-tonne liquid xenon observatory,Sci. Ch...

    arXiv 1985

  7. [12]

    J. Silk, K. A. Olive and M. Srednicki,The Photino, the Sun and High-Energy Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.55(1985) 257

    work page 1985

  8. [13]

    J. M. Gaskins,A review of indirect searches for particle dark matter,Contemp. Phys. 57(2016) 496 [1604.00014]

    arXiv 2016

Show all 64 references
  1. [14]

    Bergstrom,Indirect detection of neutralino dark matter,AIP Conf

    L. Bergstrom,Indirect detection of neutralino dark matter,AIP Conf. Proc.478 (1999) 352 [astro-ph/9902172]

    1999 arXiv

  2. [15]

    Bergstrom,Possible Structure in Cosmic gamma-rays From Dark Matter Particle Annihilation,Nucl

    L. Bergstrom,Possible Structure in Cosmic gamma-rays From Dark Matter Particle Annihilation,Nucl. Phys. B325(1989) 647

    1989

  3. [16]

    McDaniel, M

    A. McDaniel, M. Ajello, C. M. Karwin, M. Di Mauro, A. Drlica-Wagner and M. A. S´ anchez-Conde,Legacy analysis of dark matter annihilation from the Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with 14 years of Fermi-LAT data,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 063024 [2311.04982]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [17]

    McDaniel, T

    A. McDaniel, T. Jeltema and S. Profumo,Multiwavelength analysis of annihilating dark matter as the origin of the gamma-ray emission from M31,Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 103021 [1802.05258]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [18]

    Di Mauro, X

    M. Di Mauro, X. Hou, C. Eckner, G. Zaharijas and E. Charles,Search forγ-ray emission from dark matter particle interactions from Andromeda and Triangulum Galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 123027 [1904.10977]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [19]

    C. A. Arg¨ uelles, A. Diaz, A. Kheirandish, A. Olivares-Del-Campo, I. Safa and A. C. Vincent,Dark matter annihilation to neutrinos,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 035007 [1912.09486]. – 14 –

    2021 arXiv

  7. [20]

    C. A. Arg¨ uelles, D. Delgado, A. Friedlander, A. Kheirandish, I. Safa, A. C. Vincent et al.,Dark matter decay to neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 123021 [2210.01303]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [21]

    Blennow, E

    M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martinez, A. O.-D. Campo, S. Pascoli, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and A. V. Titov,Neutrino Portals to Dark Matter,1903.00006

    1903 arXiv

  9. [22]

    Boehm, Y

    C. Boehm, Y. Farzan, T. Hambye, S. Palomares-Ruiz and S. Pascoli,Is it possible to explain neutrino masses with scalar dark matter?,Phys. Rev.D77(2008) 043516 [hep-ph/0612228]

    2008 arXiv

  10. [23]

    Farzan and E

    Y. Farzan and E. Ma,Dirac neutrino mass generation from dark matter,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 033007 [1204.4890]

    2012 arXiv

  11. [24]

    Escudero, N

    M. Escudero, N. Rius and V. Sanz,Sterile neutrino portal to Dark Matter I: The U(1)B−L case,JHEP02(2017) 045 [1606.01258]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [25]

    Escudero, N

    M. Escudero, N. Rius and V. Sanz,Sterile Neutrino portal to Dark Matter II: Exact Dark symmetry,Eur. Phys. J.C77(2017) 397 [1607.02373]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [26]

    Hagedorn, J

    C. Hagedorn, J. Herrero-Garc´ ıa, E. Molinaro and M. A. Schmidt,Phenomenology of the Generalised Scotogenic Model with Fermionic Dark Matter,JHEP11(2018) 103 [1804.04117]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [27]

    J. B. G. Alvey and M. Fairbairn,Linking Scalar Dark Matter and Neutrino Masses with IceCube 170922A,1902.01450

    1902 arXiv

  15. [28]

    H. H. Patel, S. Profumo and B. Shakya,Loop Dominated Signals from Neutrino Portal Dark Matter,1912.05581

    1912 arXiv

  16. [29]

    Baumholzer, V

    S. Baumholzer, V. Brdar, P. Schwaller and A. Segner,Shining Light on the Scotogenic Model: Interplay of Colliders, Cosmology and Astrophysics,1912.08215

    1912 arXiv

  17. [30]

    Gould,Resonant Enhancements in WIMP Capture by the Earth,Astrophys

    A. Gould,Resonant Enhancements in WIMP Capture by the Earth,Astrophys. J.321 (1987) 571

    1987

  18. [31]

    Nu˜ nez Casti˜ neyra, E

    A. Nu˜ nez Casti˜ neyra, E. Nezri and V. Bertin,Dark matter capture by the Sun: revisiting velocity distribution uncertainties,JCAP12(2019) 043 [1906.11674]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [32]

    R. K. Leane and J. Smirnov,Dark matter capture in celestial objects: treatment across kinematic and interaction regimes,JCAP12(2023) 040 [2309.00669]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [33]

    Bose and S

    D. Bose and S. Sarkar,Impact of galactic distributions in celestial capture of dark matter,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 063010 [2211.16982]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [34]

    Li and J

    L. Li and J. Fan,Jupiter missions as probes of dark matter,JHEP10(2022) 186 [2207.13709]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [35]

    Gondolo and G

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini,Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B360(1991) 145. [36]IceCubecollaboration,First search for dark matter annihilations in the Earth with the IceCube Detector,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 82 [1609.01492]. [37]IceCubecollab...

    1991 arXiv

  23. [40]

    Pospelov and A

    M. Pospelov and A. Ray,Neutrinos from Earth-bound dark matter annihilation,JCAP 01(2024) 029 [2309.10032]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [41]

    Halzen and D

    F. Halzen and D. Saltzberg,Tau-neutrino appearance with a 1000 megaparsec baseline, Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 4305 [hep-ph/9804354]

    1998 arXiv

  25. [42]

    J. G. Learned and S. Pakvasa,Detecting tau-neutrino oscillations at PeV energies, Astropart. Phys.3(1995) 267 [hep-ph/9405296]

    1995 arXiv

  26. [43]

    J. F. Beacom, P. Crotty and E. W. Kolb,Enhanced Signal of Astrophysical Tau Neutrinos Propagating through Earth,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 021302 [astro-ph/0111482]

    2002 arXiv

  27. [44]

    S. I. Dutta, M. H. Reno and I. Sarcevic,Secondary neutrinos from tau neutrino interactions in earth,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 077302 [hep-ph/0207344]

    2002 arXiv

  28. [45]

    Bugaev, T

    E. Bugaev, T. Montaruli, Y. Shlepin and I. A. Sokalski,Propagation of tau neutrinos and tau leptons through the earth and their detection in underwater / ice neutrino telescopes,Astropart. Phys.21(2004) 491 [hep-ph/0312295]

    2004 arXiv

  29. [46]

    Gould,WIMP Distribution in and Evaporation From the Sun,Astrophys

    A. Gould,WIMP Distribution in and Evaporation From the Sun,Astrophys. J.321 (1987) 560

    1987

  30. [47]

    Garani and S

    R. Garani and S. Palomares-Ruiz,Evaporation of dark matter from celestial bodies, JCAP05(2022) 042 [2104.12757]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [48]

    Berezinsky, A

    V. Berezinsky, A. Bottino, J. R. Ellis, N. Fornengo, G. Mignola and S. Scopel, Searching for relic neutralinos using neutrino telescopes,Astropart. Phys.5(1996) 333 [hep-ph/9603342]

    1996 arXiv

  32. [49]

    Jungman, M

    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest,Supersymmetric dark matter,Phys. Rept.267(1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380]

    1996 arXiv

  33. [50]

    A. M. Dziewonski and D. L. Anderson,Preliminary reference earth model,Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors25(1981) 297

    1981

  34. [51]

    Balugani, J

    S. Balugani, J. A. Hernandez, N. S´ evelin-Radiguet, O. Mathon, V. Recoules, J. J. Kas et al.,New Constraints on the Melting Temperature and Phase Stability of Shocked Iron up to 270 GPa Probed by Ultrafast X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 254101

    2024

  35. [52]

    W. H. Press and D. N. Spergel,Capture by the sun of a galactic population of weakly interacting massive particles,Astrophys. J.296(1985) 679

    1985

  36. [53]

    Kouvaris and P

    C. Kouvaris and P. Tinyakov,Can Neutron stars constrain Dark Matter?,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 063531 [1004.0586]

    2010 arXiv

  37. [54]

    Bramante, A

    J. Bramante, A. Delgado and A. Martin,Multiscatter stellar capture of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 063002 [1703.04043]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [55]

    Dasgupta, A

    B. Dasgupta, A. Gupta and A. Ray,Dark matter capture in celestial objects: Improved treatment of multiple scattering and updated constraints from white dwarfs,JCAP08 (2019) 018 [1906.04204]. – 16 –

    2019 arXiv

  39. [56]

    Multiscatter stellar capture of dark matter

    C. Ilie, J. Pilawa and S. Zhang,Comment on “Multiscatter stellar capture of dark matter”,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 048301 [2005.05946]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [57]

    Bramante, J

    J. Bramante, J. Kumar, G. Mohlabeng, N. Raj and N. Song,Light dark matter accumulating in planets: Nuclear scattering,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 063022 [2210.01812]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [58]

    Q. Liu, J. Lazar, C. A. Arg¨ uelles and A. Kheirandish,χaroν: a tool for neutrino flux generation from WIMPs,JCAP10(2020) 043 [2007.15010]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [59]

    C. W. Bauer, N. L. Rodd and B. R. Webber,Dark matter spectra from the electroweak to the Planck scale,JHEP06(2021) 121 [2007.15001]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [60]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159 [1410.3012]

    2015 arXiv

  44. [61]

    I. Safa, J. Lazar, A. Pizzuto, O. Vasquez, C. A. Arg¨ uelles and J. Vandenbroucke, TauRunner: A public Python program to propagate neutral and charged leptons, Comput. Phys. Commun.278(2022) 108422 [2110.14662]. [62]ALEPHcollaboration,Updated measurement of the tau lepton life...

    2022 arXiv

  45. [63]

    A. C. Vincent, C. A. Arg¨ uelles and A. Kheirandish,High-energy neutrino attenuation in the Earth and its associated uncertainties,JCAP11(2017) 012 [1706.09895]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [64]

    Alvarez-Mu˜ niz, W

    J. Alvarez-Mu˜ niz, W. R. Carvalho, A. L. Cummings, K. Payet, A. Romero-Wolf, H. Schoorlemmer et al.,Comprehensive approach to tau-lepton production by high-energy tau neutrinos propagating through the Earth,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 023021 [1707.00334]

    2018 arXiv

  47. [65]

    Garcia, R

    A. Garcia, R. Gauld, A. Heijboer and J. Rojo,Complete predictions for high-energy neutrino propagation in matter,JCAP09(2020) 025 [2004.04756]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [66]

    Garg et al.,Neutrino propagation in the Earth and emerging charged leptons with nuPyProp,JCAP01(2023) 041 [2209.15581]

    D. Garg et al.,Neutrino propagation in the Earth and emerging charged leptons with nuPyProp,JCAP01(2023) 041 [2209.15581]. [67]IceCubecollaboration,The IceCube high-energy starting event sample: Description and flux characterization with 7.5 years of data,Phys. Rev. D104(2021)...

    2023 arXiv

  49. [69]

    Huang,Measurement of Atmospheric tau Neutrino Appearance With Icecube/deepcore, Ph.D

    F. Huang,Measurement of Atmospheric tau Neutrino Appearance With Icecube/deepcore, Ph.D. thesis, Penn State U., Penn State U., 2018. [70]IceCubecollaboration,Flavor Ratio of Astrophysical Neutrinos above 35 TeV in IceCube,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 171102 [1502.03376]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [71]

    Palladino and F

    A. Palladino and F. Vissani,The natural parameterization of cosmic neutrino oscillations,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 433 [1504.05238]

    2015 arXiv

  51. [72]

    Cowan, K

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross and O. Vitells,Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554 [1007.1727]. [73]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of Particle Physics,PTEP2022 (2022) 083C01. – 17 –

    2011 arXiv

  52. [74]

    S. S. Wilks,The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses,Annals Math. Statist.9(1938) 60. [75]PandaX-4Tcollaboration,Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 261802 [2107.13438]. [76]ANT...

    1938 arXiv

  53. [78]

    Armesto, C

    N. Armesto, C. Merino, G. Parente and E. Zas,Charged current neutrino cross-section and tau energy loss at ultra-high energies,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 013001 [0709.4461]

    2008 arXiv

  54. [79]

    Abbasi et al.,A Convolutional Neural Network based Cascade Reconstruction for the IceCube Neutrino Observatory,JINST16(2021) P07041 [2101.11589]

    R. Abbasi et al.,A Convolutional Neural Network based Cascade Reconstruction for the IceCube Neutrino Observatory,JINST16(2021) P07041 [2101.11589]. [80]IceCubecollaboration,Observation of high-energy neutrinos from the Galactic plane, Science380(2023) adc9818 [2307.04427]. [8...

    2021

  55. [83]

    V. M. Aynutdinov et al.,The Baikal-GVD Neutrino Telescope: Current Status and Development Prospects,Phys. Atom. Nucl.86(2023) 989. [84]KM3NeTcollaboration,Latest Results with the KM3NeT Neutrino Telescope,PoS T AUP2023(2024) 176. [85]TRIDENTcollaboration,A multi-cubic-kilometr...

    2023

  56. [86]

    All Morphologies

    N. Song, S. W. Li, C. A. Arg¨ uelles, M. Bustamante and A. C. Vincent,The Future of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrino Flavor Measurements,JCAP04(2021) 054 [2012.12893]. – 18 – Figure 9. Comparison of the expected dark matter signal and observed IceCube events for different ev...

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.