REVIEW 2 cited by
Accurate KV Cache Quantization with Outlier Tokens Tracing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The impressive capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) come at the cost of substantial computational resources during deployment. While KV Cache can significantly reduce recomputation during inference, it also introduces additional memory overhead. KV Cache quantization presents a promising solution, striking a good balance between memory usage and accuracy. Previous research has shown that the Keys are distributed by channel, while the Values are distributed by token. Consequently, the common practice is to apply channel-wise quantization to the Keys and token-wise quantization to the Values. However, our further investigation reveals that a small subset of unusual tokens exhibit unique characteristics that deviate from this pattern, which can substantially impact quantization accuracy. To address this, we develop a simple yet effective method to identify these tokens accurately during the decoding process and exclude them from quantization as outlier tokens, significantly improving overall accuracy. Extensive experiments show that our method achieves significant accuracy improvements under 2-bit quantization and can deliver a 6.4 times reduction in memory usage and a 2.3 times increase in throughput.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Harmonia: Algorithm-Hardware Co-Design for Memory- and Compute-Efficient BFP-based LLM Inference
Harmonia runs LLM inference with all activations in block floating point (BFP) and a 4-bit KV cache, reporting 3.08x average speedup, 2.03x energy savings, and under 1% accuracy loss on LongBench.
-
Survey of Specialized Large Language Model
A survey of 24 specialized LLMs (2022-2025) claims a shift from domain fine-tuning to native architectures, but the synthesis is undermined by citation errors and selection bias.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.