Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Gaussian Splatting as a Unified Representation for Autonomy in Unstructured Environments

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single 3D Gaussian splatting map can drive exploration, semantic navigation, and collision avoidance outdoors.

desk verdict A candid, clearly written synthesis of the authors' own 3DGS robotics systems; the unified-representation claim is plausible but rests entirely on prior work, and the exploration uncertainty metric is asserted without validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.11794 v1 pith:RDILH47S submitted 2025-05-17 cs.RO

Dexter Ong , Yuezhan Tao , Varun Murali , Igor Spasojevic , Vijay Kumar , Pratik Chaudhari This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords 3DGaussiansplattingautonomousexplorationsemanticnavigationcollisionavoidanceunstructuredoutdoorenvironmentssubmappingrobotplanninguncertaintyestimation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that 3D Gaussian splatting, a scene representation made of many small Gaussians carrying color, opacity, depth, and semantic information, is a suitable single representation for autonomous robot navigation in large-scale unstructured outdoor environments. The central claim is that the same explicit map can support exploration of unknown areas, natural-language semantic navigation, and collision avoidance, without requiring a separate grid-based occupancy map or frontier map. The authors back the claim with real-world indoor and outdoor experiments from two of their own systems, reporting better map fidelity than ensemble-based and Fisher-information-based exploration baselines, and successful task-driven navigation across large areas. If the argument holds, a robot's perception and planning stack could be unified around one dense representation that is reused, updated online, and queried for geometry, semantics, and safety.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 3D Gaussian splatting map: the environment is modeled as a set of 3D Gaussians, each with position, orientation, scale, opacity, color, and, in the semantic variant, a compressed language-feature vector. A differentiable renderer projects these Gaussians into images, allowing the robot to update parameters by comparing rendered RGB, depth, and feature images with sensor observations. Three mechanisms carry the argument. First, uncertainty for exploration is estimated from the magnitude of Gaussian parameter updates during optimization, treated as a proxy for where the map is incomplete. Second, collision avoidance works by sampling test points along candidate trajectories and issuing a single massive GPU collision check against all local Gaussians, then combining per-point results for each trajectory. Third, semantic navigation clusters Gaussians by geometric distance and feature similarity, building a sparse hierarchy of objects, regions, and submaps over which the planner finds paths, with a vision-language model deciding when the task is finished.

What would settle it

Run the exploration planner on one of the reported outdoor scenes and, at candidate viewpoints, measure actual rendered-depth error against ground truth; if the viewpoints selected by large parameter-update magnitudes reduce map error no better than random viewpoints, the uncertainty proxy fails. A second check: if a scene with millions of Gaussians cannot be navigated without exceeding GPU memory or showing visible geometric inconsistency after loop closures, the submapping claim would not be sustained.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that Gaussian splatting's explicit dense representation is more than a rendering tool: it can serve as the working map for autonomy. Geometric and photometric information can be rendered on demand for mapping; uncertainty can be estimated by tracking how much Gaussian parameters move during optimization; semantics can be stored as compressed language features inside the Gaussians; and collision checking can be performed directly against the Gaussians on the GPU. The paper reports experiments in outdoor parks and parking lots spanning roughly one thousand to twenty-two thousand square meters, with maps containing from about one million to eleven million Gaussians, showing that this representation supports task-driven navigation to natural-language goals and information-driven exploration that produces higher-quality maps than the compared baselines. It also presents a submap-based memory scheme that keeps GPU usage bounded and preserves geometric consistency during loop-closure updates.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the amount by which a Gaussian's parameters change during map optimization truly indicates how uncertain or unknown that part of the map is; the paper uses this proxy to select exploration goals but does not independently validate it against actual map error.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A robot could explore an unknown outdoor area without building an occupancy grid or signed-distance field for goal generation, because uncertainty and free-space checking both live in the Gaussian map.
  • Natural-language tasks such as finding a parking lot or a river can be planned directly on a dense map whose Gaussians carry language features, so the same representation supports both mapping and task-driven planning.
  • GPU-accelerated collision checking against millions of Gaussians can keep pace with online motion planning as long as submap loading and unloading bound the working set.
  • The submap structure lets maps exceed GPU memory limits by swapping regions between GPU and CPU, which is necessary for large-scale outdoor operation.
  • Because one map serves mapping, exploration, semantics, and collision checking, improvements to any single component, such as localization accuracy or the uncertainty metric, directly improve all navigation tasks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: If parameter-update magnitude is a valid uncertainty signal, exploration planning becomes nearly free, requiring no map ensembles and no second-order Fisher information, so replanning can occur at a much higher rate than the baselines compared in the paper.
  • Inference: The paper's coupling of localization quality to photometric map quality suggests a mixed-sensor failure mode: LiDAR-based odometry misalignment visibly corrupts rendering, and vision-only odometry drift also corrupts it, so tightly-coupled Gaussian-splatting SLAM is the natural next step.
  • Inference: The dense language features stored in Gaussians could also support terrain classification and traversability estimation, extending the same representation from object-level goal selection toward rough-terrain navigation.
  • Inference: The submap and GPU-collision machinery should extend to aerial vehicles with full 3D planning, but the search space and number of collision checks would grow; offloading submaps to disk and resolution-of-detail collision checks are plausible mitigations the authors suggest.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript argues that 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) is a suitable unified map representation for autonomous robot navigation in large-scale unstructured outdoor environments. It summarizes two prior systems from the same group—RT-GuIDE for information-driven exploration and ATLAS Navigator for semantic navigation—and adds a submapping framework, GPU-based collision checking, and a lessons-learned section. The paper claims that a single explicit 3DGS map can support exploration, semantic navigation, and collision avoidance without a separate grid map. It reports memory benchmarks, reconstruction quality comparisons, and real-world navigation trials, all drawn from the prior papers [47,48].

Significance. If the central claim is correct, it is significant: replacing the traditional grid/occupancy map with one dense representation that supports mapping, planning, and collision checking would simplify autonomy stacks and exploit GPU rendering. The paper's strengths include real outdoor robot experiments, large-scale maps with millions of Gaussians, and a clear articulation of open challenges (tightly-coupled Gaussian SLAM, sensor alignment). The manuscript is honest in attributing quantitative results to prior work. However, as written it is a synthesis of self-cited results rather than a new demonstration, and the central exploration pillar rests on an unvalidated uncertainty metric.

major comments (4)
  1. [§IV-A and §IV-C] The uncertainty metric defined in Section IV-A as the magnitude of Gaussian parameter updates during optimization is asserted without derivation or validation. In 3DGS, unobserved regions contain no Gaussians, so the metric is identically zero exactly in the areas a robot should explore; at best it measures instability of already-initialized Gaussians (e.g., newly added splats or regions early in the optimization schedule), which is an exploitation signal. The experiments in Section IV-C report final reconstruction quality (PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS/RMSE) against FisherRF and an ensemble, but do not measure exploration efficiency (coverage, path length, or number of views); the final sentence of Section IV-C also incorrectly describes these baselines as 'frontier-based.' Without a derivation linking parameter-update magnitude to map error or information gain, or a comparison against frontier-based exploration, the paper's claim that this metric enables information-driven exploration is unsupported. This is load-bearing because exploration is one of the four claimed capabilities of the unified representation.
  2. [Tables I–III and §III–§V] All quantitative evidence for the central claim comes from the authors' own prior papers: Table I is labeled 'Results from [47]', Table II is from [48], Table III is from [47], and Section III-B states 'More details of such systems are presented in [47,48].' The manuscript reports no new experiments. Since the abstract says 'We demonstrate' and Section IV-C says 'We conduct several real-world experiments,' the reader could reasonably believe these results are new. The paper should be reframed explicitly as a synthesis/position paper (or include new experiments), and the abstract and introduction should state that all quantitative results are reproduced from prior work. This matters because the paper's contribution is the unified-representation thesis, not a specific new algorithm.
  3. [§VI-C] Section VI-C admits 'significant errors in the map due to misalignment between the LiDAR odometry estimates and the camera images' and 'issues with localization due to drift in the visual-inertial odometry.' These issues directly affect the Gaussian map quality and the navigation metrics in Table III, yet the paper provides no error bars, sensitivity analysis, or quantification of how odometry error propagates into the competitive ratios. For a paper advocating a unified representation for real-world autonomy, this omission leaves the quantitative claims unbounded and weakens the lessons-learned recommendations.
  4. [§III-B and §V-A] The 'unified' claim is qualified by auxiliary structures: the system still uses an external visual-inertial odometry source (Section VI-C), a sparse hierarchical graph from agglomerative clustering (Section V-A), and a separate planning graph for Dijkstra (Section IV-B). The paper should clarify precisely which components of the autonomy stack are represented by the Gaussians and which are not. If the high-level planner operates on a separate graph, the claim that the system is unified under Gaussian splatting is only partially supported. Specify the minimal auxiliary representations that remain.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§II-B] Typo: 'Gaussian splitting' should be 'Gaussian splatting' in Section II-B.
  2. [§IV-C] The sentence 'We show that our approach is able to construct maps of higher quality and fidelity compared to other information metrics built on frontier-based exploration' is inaccurate because the listed baselines (FisherRF and ensemble) are not frontier-based; please revise or remove.
  3. [Table III] The table cells mix distances and ratios (e.g., 'SP (m / ratio)'), which is confusing; please use separate columns for distance and ratio, and clearly define the competitive ratio in the caption.
  4. [Fig. 4] The axes of Figure 4 are in log scale, but this is not stated in the caption; please add 'log-log' to the caption and define the units (ms versus number of Gaussians).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Empirical support for the unified-representation claim is drawn entirely from the authors' own prior preprints [47,48]; no new experiments or independent validation appear in this paper.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section III; Section IV-C (Table II); Section V-C (Table III); Table I caption]
    "This section summarizes our past work [47, 48] utilizing Gaussian splatting as a unified representation for navigation. ... Table II: Geometric exploration and mapping results using [48]. ... Table III: Overview of semantic navigation experiments. ... Table from [47]."

    The paper's central claim—that Gaussian splatting is a suitable unified representation for autonomy—is supported in this manuscript only by the authors' own prior preprints [47,48]. Every quantitative result offered as evidence (memory comparison, exploration/mapping quality, semantic navigation trajectories) is reproduced from those same-author papers, with captions 'Results from [47]', 'using [48]', and 'Table from [47]'. The abstract's 'we demonstrate' is therefore not a demonstration carried out here; it is an appeal to the authors' prior work. Because [47,48] are not machine-checked or independently reproduced within this paper, the evidence loop is closed by self-citation.

full rationale

The paper is a synthesis or summary of two prior same-author preprints, ATLAS Navigator [47] and RT-GuIDE [48], and it presents no new experiments. The central claim is empirical rather than derivational, and the empirical evidence consists of Tables I-III republished from [47,48]. This is a load-bearing self-citation chain because the current manuscript adds no external benchmark results of its own and the cited preprints are by the same authors. However, the cited prior work does compare against external baselines (FisherRF, ensemble, Gaussian-SLAM, LoopSplat, SplaTAM), so the claim is not definitionally forced; it rests on experiments that are at least described as comparisons to other methods. The uncertainty metric in Section IV-A—using the magnitude of Gaussian parameter updates as an uncertainty estimate—is asserted without validation and may be a poor exploration signal, but that is a correctness or epistemic concern, not circularity: the metric is not defined in terms of the exploration outcomes it is used to predict. Similarly, the absence of a frontier-based baseline is a comparison gap, not a circular step. Score 4 reflects substantial self-citation with independent content in the underlying prior experiments.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a soft architectural position rather than a numerical result, so the ledger mainly records the heuristic and design choices that the navigation outcomes depend on. The key unresolved item is the uncertainty proxy, which is asserted without validation.

free parameters (2)
  • CLIP feature compression dimension = 24
    512-dim CLIP features are approximated with 24 PCA components in Section V-A, a hand-set choice that trades semantic fidelity against map memory, with no ablation study.
  • Submap load radius = not specified
    The local map radius that controls which submaps are loaded to the GPU is set from perception range and collision safety distance in Section III-C, but the actual value and its sensitivity are not reported.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The magnitude of Gaussian parameter updates during mapping is a valid proxy for map uncertainty and information gain.
    Section IV-A defines the exploration metric this way without any derivation or independent ground-truth comparison. The exploration results in Table II depend entirely on this proxy.
  • domain assumption Exhaustive GPU collision checking against all local-map Gaussians is fast enough for real-time planning.
    Section III-D claims one batched collision test is sufficient; Figure 4 shows scaling with Gaussian count, but no end-to-end planning frequency is provided.
  • domain assumption External odometry (LiDAR or visual-inertial) is accurate enough to keep the Gaussian map geometrically consistent.
    Section VI explicitly reports significant map errors from LiDAR-camera misalignment and VIO drift, yet the whole navigation pipeline relies on such external odometry for mapping.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gaussian Splatting as a Unified Representation for Autonomy in Unstructured Environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RDILH47S

@misc{pith2026250511794,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gaussian Splatting as a Unified Representation for Autonomy in Unstructured Environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RDILH47S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.11794}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, we argue that Gaussian splatting is a suitable unified representation for autonomous robot navigation in large-scale unstructured outdoor environments. Such environments require representations that can capture complex structures while remaining computationally tractable for real-time navigation. We demonstrate that the dense geometric and photometric information provided by a Gaussian splatting representation is useful for navigation in unstructured environments. Additionally, semantic information can be embedded in the Gaussian map to enable large-scale task-driven navigation. From the lessons learned through our experiments, we highlight several challenges and opportunities arising from the use of such a representation for robot autonomy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.11794 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Robot navigating outdoor environments that lack structure in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the autonomy framework [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Novel-view rendering from the onboard Gaussian splatting map and the corresponding groundtruth observations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Time required to test for collisions of trajectories with a 5m horizon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An overview of the ATLAS Navigator system. The front-end processing modules [A] extracts and compresses dense pixel-level language features [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Experiment areas for large-scale semantic navigation. The park [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Novel-view renderings from a Gaussian splatting map. The geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [47]

    Atlas navigator: Active task-driven language-embedded gaussian splat- ting,

    D. Ong, Y . Tao, V . Murali, I. Spasojevic, V . Kumar, and P. Chaudhari, “Atlas navigator: Active task-driven language-embedded gaussian splat- ting,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.20386 , 2025

    arXiv 2025

  2. [48]

    Rt-guide: Real-time gaussian splatting for information-driven explo- ration,

    Y . Tao, D. Ong, V . Murali, I. Spasojevic, P. Chaudhari, and V . Kumar, “Rt-guide: Real-time gaussian splatting for information-driven explo- ration,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18122 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Challenges and opportunities for autonomous micro-uavs in precision agriculture,

    X. Liu, S. W. Chen, G. V . Nardari, C. Qu, F. Cladera, C. J. Taylor, and V . Kumar, “Challenges and opportunities for autonomous micro-uavs in precision agriculture,” IEEE Micro, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [2]

    Uavs for forestry: Metric- semantic mapping and diameter estimation with autonomous aerial robots,

    A. Prabhu, X. Liu, I. Spasojevic, Y . Wu, Y . Shao, D. Ong, J. Lei, P. C. Green, P. Chaudhari, and V . Kumar, “Uavs for forestry: Metric- semantic mapping and diameter estimation with autonomous aerial robots,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing , vol. 208, p. 111050, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [3]

    Search and rescue under the forest canopy using multiple uavs,

    Y . Tian, K. Liu, K. Ok, L. Tran, D. Allen, N. Roy, and J. P. How, “Search and rescue under the forest canopy using multiple uavs,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 39, no. 10-11, pp. 1201– 1221, 2020

    2020

  6. [4]

    Receding horizon path planning for 3d exploration and surface inspec- tion,

    A. Bircher, M. S. Kamel, K. Alexis, H. Oleynikova, and R. Siegwart, “Receding horizon path planning for 3d exploration and surface inspec- tion,” Autonomous Robots , vol. 42, 02 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [5]

    Octomap: An efficient probabilistic 3d mapping framework based on octrees,

    A. Hornung, K. M. Wurm, M. Bennewitz, C. Stachniss, and W. Burgard, “Octomap: An efficient probabilistic 3d mapping framework based on octrees,” Autonomous robots, vol. 34, pp. 189–206, 2013

    2013

  8. [6]

    Fiesta: Fast incremental euclidean distance fields for online motion planning of aerial robots,

    L. Han, F. Gao, B. Zhou, and S. Shen, “Fiesta: Fast incremental euclidean distance fields for online motion planning of aerial robots,” in 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2019, pp. 4423–4430

    work page 2019

Show all 56 references
  1. [7]

    V oxblox: Incremental 3d euclidean signed distance fields for on-board mav planning,

    H. Oleynikova, Z. Taylor, M. Fehr, R. Siegwart, and J. Nieto, “V oxblox: Incremental 3d euclidean signed distance fields for on-board mav planning,” in 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 1366–1373

    2017

  2. [8]

    Semantic octree mapping and shannon mutual information computation for robot exploration,

    A. Asgharivaskasi and N. Atanasov, “Semantic octree mapping and shannon mutual information computation for robot exploration,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics , vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1910–1928, 2023

    1910

  3. [9]

    Autonomous exploration and simultaneous object search using aerial robots,

    T. Dang, C. Papachristos, and K. Alexis, “Autonomous exploration and simultaneous object search using aerial robots,” in 2018 IEEE Aerospace Conference. IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–7

    2018

  4. [10]

    Slideslam: Sparse, lightweight, decentral- ized metric-semantic slam for multi-robot navigation,

    X. Liu, J. Lei, A. Prabhu, Y . Tao, I. Spasojevic, P. Chaudhari, N. Atanasov, and V . Kumar, “Slideslam: Sparse, lightweight, decentral- ized metric-semantic slam for multi-robot navigation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.17249, 2024

    2024

  5. [11]

    3d scene graph: A structure for unified semantics, 3d space, and camera,

    I. Armeni, Z.-Y . He, J. Gwak, A. R. Zamir, M. Fischer, J. Malik, and S. Savarese, “3d scene graph: A structure for unified semantics, 3d space, and camera,” in IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. on Computer Vision , 2019, pp. 5664–5673

    2019

  6. [12]

    Scenegraph- fusion: Incremental 3d scene graph prediction from rgb-d sequences,

    S.-C. Wu, J. Wald, K. Tateno, N. Navab, and F. Tombari, “Scenegraph- fusion: Incremental 3d scene graph prediction from rgb-d sequences,” in Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2021, pp. 7515–7525

    2021

  7. [13]

    3d vsg: Long-term semantic scene change prediction through 3d variable scene graphs,

    S. Looper, J. Rodriguez-Puigvert, R. Siegwart, C. Cadena, and L. Schmid, “3d vsg: Long-term semantic scene change prediction through 3d variable scene graphs,” in IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics & Automation. IEEE, 2023, pp. 8179–8186

    2023

  8. [14]

    Foundations of spatial perception for robotics: Hierarchical representations and real-time systems,

    N. Hughes, Y . Chang, S. Hu, R. Talak, R. Abdulhai, J. Strader, and L. Carlone, “Foundations of spatial perception for robotics: Hierarchical representations and real-time systems,” The International Journal of Robotics Research , 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10...

    2024 doi

  9. [15]

    Clio: Real-time task-driven open-set 3d scene graphs,

    D. Maggio, Y . Chang, N. Hughes, M. Trang, D. Griffith, C. Dougherty, E. Cristofalo, L. Schmid, and L. Carlone, “Clio: Real-time task-driven open-set 3d scene graphs,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.13696 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Orionnav: Online plan- ning for robot autonomy with context-aware llm and open-vocabulary semantic scene graphs,

    V . N. Devarakonda, R. G. Goswami, A. U. Kaypak, N. Patel, R. Khor- rambakht, P. Krishnamurthy, and F. Khorrami, “Orionnav: Online plan- ning for robot autonomy with context-aware llm and open-vocabulary semantic scene graphs,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06239 , 2024

    arXiv

  11. [17]

    Conceptgraphs: Open-vocabulary 3d scene graphs for perception and planning,

    Q. Gu, A. Kuwajerwala, S. Morin, K. Jatavallabhula, B. Sen, A. Agar- wal, C. Rivera, W. Paul, K. Ellis, R. Chellappa, C. Gan, C. de Melo, J. Tenenbaum, A. Torralba, F. Shkurti, and L. Paull, “Conceptgraphs: Open-vocabulary 3d scene graphs for perception and planning,” Inter- n...

    2024

  12. [18]

    Hi- erarchical Open-V ocabulary 3D Scene Graphs for Language-Grounded Robot Navigation,

    A. Werby, C. Huang, M. B ¨uchner, A. Valada, and W. Burgard, “Hi- erarchical Open-V ocabulary 3D Scene Graphs for Language-Grounded Robot Navigation,” in Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems , Delft, Netherlands, July 2024

    2024

  13. [19]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis,

    B. Mildenhall, P. P. Srinivasan, M. Tancik, J. T. Barron, R. Ramamoorthi, and R. Ng, “Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis,” Communications of the ACM , vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 99–106, 2021

    2021

  14. [20]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering,

    B. Kerbl, G. Kopanas, T. Leimk ¨uhler, and G. Drettakis, “3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2023

    2023

  15. [21]

    Splatam: Splat, track & map 3d gaussians for dense rgb-d slam,

    N. Keetha, J. Karhade, K. M. Jatavallabhula, G. Yang, S. Scherer, D. Ramanan, and J. Luiten, “Splatam: Splat, track & map 3d gaussians for dense rgb-d slam,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024

    2024

  16. [22]

    Rtg- slam: Real-time 3d reconstruction at scale using gaussian splatting,

    Z. Peng, T. Shao, Y . Liu, J. Zhou, Y . Yang, J. Wang, and K. Zhou, “Rtg- slam: Real-time 3d reconstruction at scale using gaussian splatting,” in ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers , 2024, pp. 1–11

    2024

  17. [23]

    Cg-slam: Efficient dense rgb-d slam in a consistent uncertainty- aware 3d gaussian field,

    J. Hu, X. Chen, B. Feng, G. Li, L. Yang, H. Bao, G. Zhang, and Z. Cui, “Cg-slam: Efficient dense rgb-d slam in a consistent uncertainty- aware 3d gaussian field,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2025, pp. 93–112

    2025

  18. [24]

    Hammer: Heterogeneous, multi-robot semantic gaussian splatting,

    J. Yu, T. Chen, and M. Schwager, “Hammer: Heterogeneous, multi-robot semantic gaussian splatting,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.14147 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Multimodal llm guided exploration and active mapping using fisher information,

    W. Jiang, B. Lei, K. Ashton, and K. Daniilidis, “Multimodal llm guided exploration and active mapping using fisher information,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17422, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Fisherrf: Active view selection and uncertainty quantification for radiance fields using fisher information,

    W. Jiang, B. Lei, and K. Daniilidis, “Fisherrf: Active view selection and uncertainty quantification for radiance fields using fisher information,” arXiv, 2023

    2023

  21. [27]

    Langsplat: 3d language gaussian splatting,

    M. Qin, W. Li, J. Zhou, H. Wang, and H. Pfister, “Langsplat: 3d language gaussian splatting,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024, pp. 20 051–20 060

    2024

  22. [28]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark, et al., “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2021, pp. 8748–8763

    2021

  23. [29]

    Loopsplat: Loop closure by registering 3d gaussian splats,

    L. Zhu, Y . Li, E. Sandstr ¨om, S. Huang, K. Schindler, and I. Armeni, “Loopsplat: Loop closure by registering 3d gaussian splats,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10154, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Gaussian-slam: Photo-realistic dense slam with gaussian splatting,

    V . Yugay, Y . Li, T. Gevers, and M. R. Oswald, “Gaussian-slam: Photo-realistic dense slam with gaussian splatting,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10070, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  25. [31]

    A frontier-based approach for autonomous exploration,

    B. Yamauchi, “A frontier-based approach for autonomous exploration,” in Proceedings 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation CIRA’97. ’Towards New Com- putational Principles for Robotics and Automation’ . IEEE, 1997, pp. 146–151. 8

    1997

  26. [32]

    Autonomous indoor 3d exploration with a micro-aerial vehicle,

    S. Shen, N. Michael, and V . Kumar, “Autonomous indoor 3d exploration with a micro-aerial vehicle,” in 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation . IEEE, 2012, pp. 9–15

    2012

  27. [33]

    Fuel: Fast uav exploration using incremental frontier structure and hierarchical planning,

    B. Zhou, Y . Zhang, X. Chen, and S. Shen, “Fuel: Fast uav exploration using incremental frontier structure and hierarchical planning,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 779–786, 2021

    2021

  28. [34]

    SEER: Safe efficient exploration for aerial robots using learning to predict information gain,

    Y . Tao, Y . Wu, B. Li, F. Cladera, A. Zhou, D. Thakur, and V . Kumar, “SEER: Safe efficient exploration for aerial robots using learning to predict information gain,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 1235–1241

    2023

  29. [35]

    Information theoretic active exploration in signed distance fields,

    K. Saulnier, N. Atanasov, G. J. Pappas, and V . Kumar, “Information theoretic active exploration in signed distance fields,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 4080–4085

    2020

  30. [36]

    An efficient sampling-based method for online informative path planning in unknown environments,

    L. Schmid, M. Pantic, R. Khanna, L. Ott, R. Siegwart, and J. Nieto, “An efficient sampling-based method for online informative path planning in unknown environments,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1500–1507, 2020

    2020

  31. [37]

    Information-theoretic mapping using cauchy-schwarz quadratic mutual information,

    B. Charrow, S. Liu, V . Kumar, and N. Michael, “Information-theoretic mapping using cauchy-schwarz quadratic mutual information,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2015, pp. 4791–4798

    2015

  32. [38]

    Receding horizon

    A. Bircher, M. Kamel, K. Alexis, H. Oleynikova, and R. Siegwart, “Receding horizon” next-best-view” planner for 3d exploration,” in 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 1462–1468

    2016

  33. [39]

    An ac- tive perception game for robust information gathering,

    S. He, Y . Tao, I. Spasojevic, V . Kumar, and P. Chaudhari, “An ac- tive perception game for robust information gathering,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.00769, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Active per- ception using neural radiance fields,

    S. He, C. D. Hsu, D. Ong, Y . S. Shao, and P. Chaudhari, “Active per- ception using neural radiance fields,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.09892 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Gs-planner: A gaussian-splatting-based planning framework for active high-fidelity reconstruction,

    R. Jin, Y . Gao, Y . Wang, H. Lu, and F. Gao, “Gs-planner: A gaussian-splatting-based planning framework for active high-fidelity reconstruction,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405. 10142

    2024

  36. [42]

    Hgs-planner: Hierarchical planning framework for ac- tive scene reconstruction using 3d gaussian splatting,

    Z. Xu, R. Jin, K. Wu, Y . Zhao, Z. Zhang, J. Zhao, F. Gao, Z. Gan, and W. Ding, “Hgs-planner: Hierarchical planning framework for ac- tive scene reconstruction using 3d gaussian splatting,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17624, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Optimal scene graph planning with large language model guidance,

    Z. Dai, A. Asgharivaskasi, T. Duong, S. Lin, M.-E. Tzes, G. Pappas, and N. Atanasov, “Optimal scene graph planning with large language model guidance,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 14 062–14 069

    2024

  38. [44]

    Hierarchical representations and explicit memory: Learning effective navigation policies on 3d scene graphs using graph neural networks,

    Z. Ravichandran, L. Peng, N. Hughes, J. D. Griffith, and L. Carlone, “Hierarchical representations and explicit memory: Learning effective navigation policies on 3d scene graphs using graph neural networks,” in 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . ...

    2022

  39. [45]

    Vlfm: Vision- language frontier maps for zero-shot semantic navigation,

    N. Yokoyama, S. Ha, D. Batra, J. Wang, and B. Bucher, “Vlfm: Vision- language frontier maps for zero-shot semantic navigation,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 42–48

    2024

  40. [46]

    Spine: Online semantic planning for missions with incomplete natural language specifications in unstructured environments,

    Z. Ravichandran, V . Murali, M. Tzes, G. J. Pappas, and V . Kumar, “Spine: Online semantic planning for missions with incomplete natural language specifications in unstructured environments,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.03035, 2024

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Groundgrid: Lidar point cloud ground segmentation and terrain estimation,

    N. Steinke, D. Goehring, and R. Rojas, “Groundgrid: Lidar point cloud ground segmentation and terrain estimation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 420–426, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Splat-nav: Safe real-time robot navigation in gaussian splatting maps,

    T. Chen, O. Shorinwa, J. Bruno, A. Swann, J. Yu, W. Zeng, K. Nagami, P. Dames, and M. Schwager, “Splat-nav: Safe real-time robot navigation in gaussian splatting maps,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 2025

    2025

  43. [51]

    Search-based motion planning for aggressive flight in SE(3),

    S. Liu, K. Mohta, N. Atanasov, and V . Kumar, “Search-based motion planning for aggressive flight in SE(3),” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 2439–2446, 2018

    2018

  44. [52]

    Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment,

    Z. Wang, E. Simoncelli, and A. Bovik, “Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment,” in The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Confer- ence on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003 , vol. 2, 2003, pp. 1398– 1402 V ol.2

    2003

  45. [53]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric,

    R. Zhang, P. Isola, A. A. Efros, E. Shechtman, and O. Wang, “The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric,” in CVPR, 2018

    2018

  46. [54]

    Microsoft coco: Common objects in context,

    T.-Y . Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Doll ´ar, and C. L. Zitnick, “Microsoft coco: Common objects in context,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13 . Springer,...

    2014

  47. [55]

    Conceptfusion: Open-set multimodal 3d mapping,

    K. M. Jatavallabhula, A. Kuwajerwala, Q. Gu, M. Omama, T. Chen, A. Maalouf, S. Li, G. Iyer, S. Saryazdi, N. Keetha, et al. , “Conceptfusion: Open-set multimodal 3d mapping,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07241, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Activegs: Active scene reconstruction using gaussian splatting,

    L. Jin, X. Zhong, Y . Pan, J. Behley, C. Stachniss, and M. Popovi ´c, “Activegs: Active scene reconstruction using gaussian splatting,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 2025

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.