Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 127 references

Lecture Notes: WISPs in gamma-ray astrophysics

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read These lecture notes show that ALP-photon conversion in cosmic magnetic fields can imprint observable signatures on gamma-ray spectra, spatial distributions, and polarization, and they derive the conversion probability from first principles.

desk verdict Competent, clearly-written lecture notes with a genuinely useful tutorial package; the only real problem is a sign inconsistency in Exercise 2 that should be corrected before teaching from it. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12905 v1 pith:SBMDMBZI submitted 2025-05-19 astro-ph.HE hep-ph

Francesca Calore , Christopher Eckner This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords axion-likeparticlesALP-photonconversiongamma-rayastrophysicsWISPsdarkmatterNGC1275axionelectrodynamicslecturenotes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that axion-like particles (ALPs), although extremely weakly coupled, can be probed through their conversion into photons in astrophysical magnetic fields. It provides a self-contained route from the axion-photon Lagrangian to the photon-ALP conversion probability, then applies this formalism to gamma-ray observations of NGC 1275 to derive constraints on the ALP-photon coupling. If the derivations and tutorial are correct, the notes faithfully reproduce the standard framework used in current ALP searches and give readers a working toolkit for similar analyses. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers an accessible way to test physics beyond the Standard Model without building a laboratory experiment.

What carries the argument

The central object is the axion-photon interaction term $\mathcal{L}_{a\gamma}=-\tfrac14 g_{a\gamma} F_{\mu\nu}\tilde F^{\mu\nu} a = g_{a\gamma}\,\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{B}\,a$, which couples the ALP field $a$ to the electromagnetic field strength and its dual. From this Lagrangian, the paper derives a linearized, coupled Schr\"odinger-type equation for the state $(a, A_\parallel)^T$ in a constant magnetic field. The mixing is governed by the matrix with entries $\Delta_a=m_a^2/(2\omega)$ and $\Delta_{a\gamma}=-\tfrac12 g_{a\gamma} B_0$, and diagonalization through the angle $\theta$ yields the sinusoidal conversion probability. This machinery carries the entire argument: it turns the abstract axion-photon coupling into a concrete, testable prediction for how gamma-ray spectra should be modified.

What would settle it

Re-run the NGC 1275 exercise with a purely ordered (fully coherent) magnetic field model: if the exclusion region in the $(m_a, g_{a\gamma})$ plane disappears, then the tutorial's constraints are artifacts of the assumed field model rather than robust properties of the ALP-photon conversion framework.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that ALP-photon conversion in astrophysical magnetic fields is a well-defined, calculable process that can leave distinctive imprints on high-energy photon signals. The paper derives the modified Maxwell equations of axion electrodynamics from the Lagrangian and then, in a static and uniform magnetic field, obtains the coupled propagation equations for the parallel photon polarization and the ALP state. Solving these equations for an initially pure photon beam gives the conversion probability $P_{\gamma\to a}(z)=\sin^2(2\theta)\,\sin^2\!\big(z\sqrt{\Delta_a^2+(2\Delta_{a\gamma})^2}/2\big)$, matching the standard result. The tutorial then applies this probability to the gamma-ray spectrum of NGC 1275, modeling the Perseus cluster magnetic field as a homogeneous field with Gaussian turbulence and deriving upper limits on the ALP-photon coupling for ALP masses around 0.5 to 5 neV.

Load-bearing premise

The tutorial's constraints from NGC 1275 assume the Perseus intracluster magnetic field is a homogeneous field with Gaussian turbulence while neglecting conversion in the intergalactic medium; if the real field is largely ordered, the derived limits almost vanish.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ALP-photon conversion in a single magnetic domain produces energy-dependent oscillations in the conversion probability, which can imprint spectral irregularities on the otherwise smooth gamma-ray spectra of bright point sources.
  • In turbulent magnetic fields with many domains, the ensemble-averaged conversion can make very-high-energy photons more transparent than expected, leading to apparent spectral hardening of distant sources.
  • Conversions can also convert ALPs produced in supernovae or other astrophysical sources back into gamma rays, producing time-dependent or diffuse signals that trace the Milky Way's magnetic field structure.
  • If ALPs are the dark matter and decay into two photons, the decay produces a sharp spectral line at half the ALP mass, and the notes show how targeted observations of dark-matter-rich systems can constrain this process.
  • The same formalism applies to different astrophysical environments, so any robust detection or bound depends on knowing the magnetic field strength, coherence length, and free electron density along the line of sight.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors do not stress it, but the conversion probability depends on the product $g_{a\gamma} B$ rather than the coupling alone, so constraints on $g_{a\gamma}$ from any single source are degenerate with the assumed magnetic field strength; combining sources with different field environments could help break that degeneracy.
  • The tutorial's NGC 1275 limits are explicitly sensitive to the assumed intracluster magnetic field model. An inference is that future ALP searches should prioritize sources whose magnetic field structures are independently measured (through rotation measures or polarization) to obtain robust constraints.
  • The same derivation could be extended to time-dependent magnetic fields, such as those in pulsar magnetospheres or merging neutron stars, where the conversion probability would acquire an additional temporal modulation that might produce correlated gamma-ray and gravitational-wave signals.
  • If gamma-ray polarization measurements become routinely available, the polarization-dependent nature of ALP-photon conversion (only the parallel polarization mixes) would provide a new observable that is largely independent of spectral shape and could cleanly separate ALP effects from astrophysical background models.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. These lecture notes provide a broad pedagogical review of axion-like particle (ALP) phenomenology in high-energy gamma-ray astrophysics, covering high-energy astrophysical sources, the ALP-photon mixing formalism, observational signatures (spectral distortions, spectral hardening, diffuse emission), dark-matter decay searches, and a hands-on tutorial with three exercises. The central pedagogical claim is that Section 6.2 gives a self-contained derivation of the photon-ALP conversion probability (Eq. 37) starting from the axion-photon Lagrangian (Eq. 23), and that the NGC 1275 data-analysis exercise reproduces the framework used in current ALP searches. The paper also serves as a record of training-school material, with code and notebooks made available on Zenodo.

Significance. If correct, the tutorial would be a valuable self-contained teaching resource: it connects the Lagrangian-level formalism to a concrete observable and to real data, and the review portions accurately reflect the current status of ALP searches, including honest caveats about magnetic-field model dependence (e.g., the near-vanishing of NGC 1275 limits for a purely ordered field, citing Libanov and Troitsky). The use of public Fermi-LAT data and open-source software (gammaALPs) is commendable, and the final conversion probability formula (Eq. 37) is standard and internally consistent with Eq. (12). However, the correctness of the tutorial route is compromised by a sign error in the printed intermediate steps of Exercise 2, which undermines the claim of a self-contained derivation even though the final result is unchanged.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 6.2, Eqs. (31)-(34)] The printed derivation of the photon propagation equation contains a sign error. With the stated plane-wave ansatz δA∥ = i e^{iω(z-t)} A∥(z) and δa = e^{iω(z-t)} a(z), Eq. (31) leads to the intermediate expression 2ω ∂z A∥ = -iω g_aγ B0 a, which algebraically implies i∂z A∥ = + (1/2) g_aγ B0 a. The next line instead states i∂z A∥ = - (1/2) g_aγ B0 a, and Eq. (34) adopts Δ_aγ = -g_aγ B/2 for both off-diagonal entries. Thus the final matrix is not the one obtained from the preceding equations; the derivation as printed does not connect Eq. (31) to Eq. (34). The final formula Eq. (37) remains correct because it is invariant under the overall sign of the mixing matrix, but the tutorial route is invalid as written and must be corrected.
  2. [Section 3.2, Eqs. (8)-(9) vs. Section 6.2, Eq. (34)] The sign convention for the fundamental mixing parameters changes without comment. The general formalism uses Δ_a = -m_a^2/(2ω) and Δ_aγ = +g_aγ B/2, whereas the tutorial defines Δ_a = +m_a^2/(2ω) and Δ_aγ = -g_aγ B/2. While the conversion probability is unaffected because only relative signs enter the oscillation formula, a tutorial should either adopt the same convention as the main text or explicitly state that an overall phase redefinition has been applied; as printed, the two sections are internally inconsistent on this point.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Section 6.3] The table of contents labels this section as a 'Derivation of constraints on ALP-photon coupling from the gamma-ray observations of NGC 1275,' but the printed text does not actually perform the derivation; it refers the reader to a Zenodo repository for the code and notebooks. The text should make this division of labour explicit at the start of Section 6.3 (or in the introduction) to avoid overpromising in the narration.
  2. [General] There are a few minor typographical errors, such as 'the the signatures' at the end of Section 3.2 and 'an axion-universe' in Section 6.2; these should be corrected in a final pass.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the tutorial derivations are self-contained from the Lagrangian, and the data exercise is an explicit reproduction of a published analysis.

full rationale

The paper is a set of lecture notes whose central technical claims are derived in place rather than imported from the conclusion. Section 6.1 varies the axion-electrodynamics Lagrangian (Eq. 23) to obtain the modified Maxwell equations (Eqs. 26 and 27), and Section 6.2 linearizes those equations with an explicit plane-wave ansatz to build the propagation matrix (Eq. 34) and the conversion probability (Eq. 37). The final probability has the same functional form as the standard result quoted in Eq. 12, but it is derived from the Lagrangian in the text rather than assumed from that quotation; agreement with a known result is not circularity. The NGC 1275 exercise is explicitly a reproduction of the Fermi-LAT collaboration analysis [72] using public data and the external gammaALPs package, with the paper stating that limits are highly sensitive to the assumed magnetic-field model and citing [73] for the ordered-field case; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Some citations are to the authors' own previous work, but they are contextual or review citations (e.g., diffuse supernova axion bounds, INTEGRAL constraints) and do not carry the derivation of Eqs. 26-37. There is a printed sign inconsistency in Exercise 2's intermediate steps, but that is an algebraic slip, not a circular reduction of the result to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review, so it pulls its central physics from prior literature: the ALP-photon interaction, the mixing formalism, and the magnetic field models are all external inputs. It introduces no new free parameters, entities, or fitted quantities of its own.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The ALP-photon interaction Lagrangian L = -1/4 g_aγ F_μν tilde F_μν a (Eq. 3) describes a real coupling in nature.
    The whole review adopts this beyond-Standard-Model interaction as the benchmark. It is a hypothesis, not proven.
  • domain assumption The photon-ALP mixing formalism of Raffelt and Stodolsky (Eqs. 4-17) correctly captures the propagation phenomenology.
    The review uses this established framework without re-deriving its validity. It is a standard tool in the field.
  • domain assumption The astrophysical sources and magnetic field models described in Sections 2 and 4 are representative, and the Perseus cluster field in the tutorial can be modeled as homogeneous with Gaussian turbulence.
    The tutorial's constraints depend on this B-field model, and the paper itself notes limits nearly vanish for a purely ordered field (Sec. 4.3, citing [73]).
  • domain assumption The standard astrophysical expectations for gamma-ray spectra and EBL absorption are correct, so deviations can be attributed to ALPs.
    Signatures are defined as deviations from standard spectra; if the baseline astrophysics is wrong, the ALP interpretation changes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lecture Notes: WISPs in gamma-ray astrophysics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SBMDMBZI

@misc{pith2026250512905,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lecture Notes: WISPs in gamma-ray astrophysics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SBMDMBZI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12905}
}
read the original abstract

These lecture notes provide an overview of high-energy astrophysical processes involving axions, axion-like particles (ALPs), and other weakly interacting slim particles (WISPs) focusing on their potential observational signatures in astrophysical environments. After introducing key concepts in high-energy astrophysics, we present the fundamental properties of WISPs, emphasizing their phenomenological implications. Particular attention is given to ALP-photon conversion in strong magnetic fields and the possible decay signatures of ALPs in sources such as active galactic nuclei, galaxy clusters, and cosmic-ray accelerators. These effects can lead to distinctive modifications in astrophysical spectra, spatial distributions, and polarization patterns, providing unique probes of physics beyond the Standard Model. We discuss their role in dark matter scenarios and their potential impact on high-energy observations. The lecture series is supplemented by hands-on tutorials, including exercises on axion electrodynamics and an analysis of gamma-ray data from NGC 1275 to search for ALP-photon conversion signatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.12905 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Dependence of the ALP-photon conversion probability 𝑃(𝑎 → 𝛾) on the ALP mass. We display the cases 𝑚𝑎 = 10 neV (purple) and 𝑚𝑎 = 600 neV (orange) for a coupling strength of 𝑔𝑎𝛾 = 3 × 10−11 GeV−1 . The dashed vertical lines mark the onset and end of the strong mixing regime with energy. Note that the upper boundary of this regime is the same for both ALP masses. The conversion probability was calculated for a single … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the evolution of photon (purple) and ALP (yellow) fluxes as a function of distance travelled within a distant extragalactic host source (left panel) or the Milky Way (right panel). The photon flux is normalized to one, with the ALP flux scaled accordingly. The distance in the left panel is given in units of the host’s magnetic field coherence length. This panel also illustrates the effect… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Caputo and G

    A. Caputo and G. Raffelt,Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition,PoS COSMICWISPers(2024) 041 [2401.13728]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Tadhunter,An introduction to active galactic nuclei: Classification and unification, New Astronomy Reviews52(2008) 227

    C. Tadhunter,An introduction to active galactic nuclei: Classification and unification, New Astronomy Reviews52(2008) 227

    2008

  3. [3]

    D. C. Gabuzda,Inherent and Local Magnetic Field Structures in Jets from Active Galactic Nuclei,Galaxies9 (2021) 58

    2021

  4. [4]

    Orlando,Modeling the Evolution from Massive Stars to Supernovae and Supernova Remnants,PoSMULTIF2023(2024) 043 [2311.05612]

    S. Orlando,Modeling the Evolution from Massive Stars to Supernovae and Supernova Remnants,PoSMULTIF2023(2024) 043 [2311.05612]

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    S. P. Reynolds, B. M. Gaensler and F. Bocchino,Magnetic Fields in Supernova Remnants and Pulsar-Wind Nebulae, Space Science Reviews166 (2012) 231 [1104.4047]

    arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    T. A. Thompson, E. Quataert, E. Waxman, N. Murray and C. L. Martin,Magnetic Fields in Starburst Galaxies and the Origin of the FIR-Radio Correlation,Astrophys. J.645 (2006) 186 [astro-ph/0601626]

    arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Govoni and L

    F. Govoni and L. Feretti,Magnetic field in clusters of galaxies, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D13 (2004) 1549 [astro-ph/0410182]

    arXiv 2004

  8. [8]

    R. Hill, K. W. Masui and D. Scott,The Spectrum of the Universe, Appl. Spectrosc.72 (2018) 663 [1802.03694]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 127 references
  1. [9]

    Abramowski et al.,Diffuse Galactic gamma-ray emission with H.E.S.S,Phys

    H.E.S.S.Collaboration, A. Abramowski et al.,Diffuse Galactic gamma-ray emission with H.E.S.S,Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 122007 [1411.7568]

    2014 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Abdalla et al.,Characterising the VHE diffuse emission in the central 200 parsecs of our Galaxy with H.E.S.S,Astron

    HESSCollaboration, H. Abdalla et al.,Characterising the VHE diffuse emission in the central 200 parsecs of our Galaxy with H.E.S.S,Astron. Astrophys.612 (2018) A9 [1706.04535]. 25 Training School Lecture Notes: WISPs in gamma-ray astrophysics Francesca Calore

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    HA WCCollaboration, A. U. Abeysekara et al.,Galactic Gamma-Ray Diffuse Emission at TeV energies with HAWC Data, PoSICRC2021(2021) 835

    2021

  4. [12]

    Alfaro et al.,Galactic Gamma-Ray Diffuse Emission at TeV Energies with HAWC Data, Astrophys

    HA WCCollaboration, R. Alfaro et al.,Galactic Gamma-Ray Diffuse Emission at TeV Energies with HAWC Data, Astrophys. J.961 (2024) 104 [2310.09117]

    2024

  5. [13]

    Amenomori et al.,First Detection of sub-PeV Diffuse Gamma Rays from the Galactic Disk: Evidence for Ubiquitous Galactic Cosmic Rays beyond PeV Energies, Phys

    Tibet AS𝛾 CollaborationCollaboration, M. Amenomori et al.,First Detection of sub-PeV Diffuse Gamma Rays from the Galactic Disk: Evidence for Ubiquitous Galactic Cosmic Rays beyond PeV Energies, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 141101 [2104.05181]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Cao et al.,Measurement of Ultra-High-Energy Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emission of the Galactic Plane from 10 TeV to 1 PeV with LHAASO-KM2A, Phys

    LHAASO Collaboration, Z. Cao et al.,Measurement of Ultra-High-Energy Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emission of the Galactic Plane from 10 TeV to 1 PeV with LHAASO-KM2A, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 151001 [2305.05372]

    2023

  7. [15]

    Cao et al.,Measurement of Very-high-energy Diffuse Gamma-ray Emissions from the Galactic Plane with LHAASO-WCDA, 2411.16021

    LHAASO Collaboration, Z. Cao et al.,Measurement of Very-high-energy Diffuse Gamma-ray Emissions from the Galactic Plane with LHAASO-WCDA, 2411.16021

  8. [16]

    Franceschini,Photon–Photon Interactions and the Opacity of the Universe in Gamma Rays, Universe7 (2021) 146

    A. Franceschini,Photon–Photon Interactions and the Opacity of the Universe in Gamma Rays, Universe7 (2021) 146

    2021

  9. [17]

    Fabbrichesi, E

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli and G. Lanfranchi,The Dark Photon, 2005.01515

    2005 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Higaki, K

    T. Higaki, K. S. Jeong and F. Takahashi,The 7 keV axion dark matter and the X-ray line signal,Phys. Lett. B733 (2014) 25 [1402.6965]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Caputo, M

    A. Caputo, M. Regis, M. Taoso and S. J. Witte,Detecting the Stimulated Decay of Axions at RadioFrequencies,JCAP03(2019) 027 [1811.08436]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Caputo, C

    A. Caputo, C. P. n. Garay and S. J. Witte,Looking for Axion Dark Matter in Dwarf Spheroidals,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 083024 [1805.08780]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 99, 089901 (2019)]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Drewes et al.,A White Paper on keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter, JCAP01 (2017) 025 [1602.04816]

    M. Drewes et al.,A White Paper on keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter, JCAP01 (2017) 025 [1602.04816]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Bezrukov, H

    F. Bezrukov, H. Hettmansperger and M. Lindner,keV sterile neutrino Dark Matter in gauge extensions of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 085032 [0912.4415]

    2010 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Müller, P

    E. Müller, P. Carenza, C. Eckner and A. Goobar,Constraining MeV-scale axionlike particles with Fermi-LAT observations of SN 2023ixf,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023018 [2306.16397]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Caputo, H.-T

    A. Caputo, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano,Low-Energy Supernovae Severely Constrain Radiative Particle Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 221103 [2201.09890]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Calore, P

    F. Calore, P. Carenza, M. Giannotti, J. Jaeckel and A. Mirizzi,Bounds on axionlike particles from the diffuse supernova flux,Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 123005 [2008.11741]. 26 Training School Lecture Notes: WISPs in gamma-ray astrophysics Francesca Calore

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Caputo, G

    A. Caputo, G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano,Muonic boson limits: Supernova redux,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 035022 [2109.03244]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Calore, P

    F. Calore, P. Carenza, M. Giannotti, J. Jaeckel, G. Lucente, L. Mastrototaro and A. Mirizzi, 511 keV line constraints on feebly interacting particles from supernovae,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 063026 [2112.08382]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    De la Torre Luque, S

    P. De la Torre Luque, S. Balaji, P. Carenza and L. Mastrototaro,𝛾 rays from in-flight positron annihilation as a probe of new physics, 2405.08482

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Carenza, G

    P. Carenza, G. Lucente, L. Mastrototaro, A. Mirizzi and P. D. Serpico,Comprehensive constraints on heavy sterile neutrinos from core-collapse supernovae,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 063010 [2311.00033]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Raffelt and L

    G. Raffelt and L. Stodolsky,Mixing of the Photon with Low Mass Particles,Phys. Rev. D37 (1988) 1237

    1988

  23. [31]

    De Angelis, M

    A. De Angelis, M. Roncadelli and O. Mansutti,Evidence for a new light spin-zero boson fromcosmologicalgamma-raypropagation? ,Phys.Rev.D 76(2007)121301[ 0707.4312]

    2007 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Mirizzi and D

    A. Mirizzi and D. Montanino,Stochastic conversions of TeV photons into axion-like particles in extragalactic magnetic fields, JCAP12 (2009) 004 [0911.0015]

    2009 arXiv

  25. [33]

    De Angelis, G

    A. De Angelis, G. Galanti and M. Roncadelli,Relevance of axion-like particles for very-high-energy astrophysics, Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 105030 [1106.1132]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 87, 109903 (2013)]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Meyer, D

    M. Meyer, D. Montanino and J. Conrad,On detecting oscillations of gamma rays into axion-like particles in turbulent and coherent magnetic fields, JCAP09(2014) 003 [1406.5972]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Kartavtsev, G

    A. Kartavtsev, G. Raffelt and H. Vogel,Extragalactic photon-ALP conversion at CTA energies,JCAP01(2017) 024 [1611.04526]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Dobrynina, A

    A. Dobrynina, A. Kartavtsev and G. Raffelt,Photon-photon dispersion of TeV gamma rays and its role for photon-ALP conversion, Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 083003 [1412.4777]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 109905 (2017)]

    2015 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Calore, P

    F. Calore, P. Carenza, C. Eckner, M. Giannotti, G. Lucente, A. Mirizzi and F. Sivo, Uncovering axionlike particles in supernova gamma-ray spectra,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 043010 [2306.03925]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Meyer, J

    M. Meyer, J. Davies and J. Kuhlmann,gammaALPs: An open-source python package for computing photon-axion-like-particle oscillations in astrophysical environments, PoS ICRC2021(2021) 557 [2108.02061]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Fermi-LATCollaboration, W. B. Atwood et al.,The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission, Astrophys. J.697 (2009) 1071 [0902.1089]. 27 Training School Lecture Notes: WISPs in gamma-ray astrophysics Francesca Calore

    2009 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Abeysekara et al.,Observation of the Crab Nebula with the HAWC Gamma-Ray Observatory, Astrophys

    A. Abeysekara et al.,Observation of the Crab Nebula with the HAWC Gamma-Ray Observatory, Astrophys. J.843 (2017) 39 [1701.01778]

    2017 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Aharonian et al.,The observation of the Crab Nebula with LHAASO-KM2A for the performance study, Chin

    F. Aharonian et al.,The observation of the Crab Nebula with LHAASO-KM2A for the performance study, Chin. Phys. C45(2021) 025002 [2010.06205]

    2021

  34. [42]

    LHAASOCollaboration, Performance of LHAASO-WCDA and Observation of Crab Nebula as a Standard Candle, 2101.03508

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    F. R. Candón, D. F. G. Fiorillo, G. Lucente, E. Vitagliano and J. K. Vogel,NuSTAR bounds on radiatively decaying particles from M82, 2412.03660

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    N. H. Nguyen, E. H. Tanin and M. Kamionkowski,Spectra of axions emitted from main sequence stars, JCAP11 (2023) 091 [2307.11216]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Carenza, O

    P. Carenza, O. Straniero, B. Döbrich, M. Giannotti, G. Lucente and A. Mirizzi,Constraints on the coupling with photons of heavy axion-like-particles from Globular Clusters, Phys. Lett. B809 (2020) 135709 [2004.08399]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Lucente, P

    G. Lucente, P. Carenza, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti and A. Mirizzi,Heavy axion-like particles and core-collapse supernovae: constraints and impact on the explosion mechanism,JCAP 12(2020) 008 [2008.04918]

    2020

  39. [47]

    G. G. Raffelt,Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles. 5, 1996

    1996

  40. [48]

    Hanhart, D

    C. Hanhart, D. R. Phillips and S. Reddy,Neutrino and axion emissivities of neutron stars from nucleon-nucleon scattering data, Phys. Lett. B499 (2001) 9 [astro-ph/0003445]

    2001 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Carenza, T

    P. Carenza, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, G. Guo, G. Martínez-Pinedo and A. Mirizzi,Improved axion emissivity from a supernova via nucleon-nucleon bremsstrahlung,JCAP10(2019) 016 [1906.11844]. [Erratum: JCAP 05, E01 (2020)]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Carenza, B

    P. Carenza, B. Fore, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and S. Reddy,Enhanced Supernova Axion Emission and its Implications, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 071102 [2010.02943]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Ning and B

    O. Ning and B. R. Safdi,Leading Axion-Photon Sensitivity with NuSTAR Observations of M82 and M87, 2404.14476

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Carenza, M

    P. Carenza, M. Giannotti, J. Isern, A. Mirizzi and O. Straniero,Axion Astrophysics, 2411.02492

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    M. D. Diamond and G. Marques-Tavares,𝛾-Ray Flashes from Dark Photons in Neutron Star Mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 211101 [2106.03879]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and F. Iocco,Axions from neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 123007. 28 Training School Lecture Notes: WISPs in gamma-ray astrophysics Francesca Calore

    2022

  47. [55]

    P. S. B. Dev, J.-F. Fortin, S. P. Harris, K. Sinha and Y. Zhang,First Constraints on the Photon Coupling of Axionlike Particles from Multimessenger Studies of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 101003 [2305.01002]

    2024

  48. [56]

    Diamond, D

    M. Diamond, D. F. G. Fiorillo, G. Marques-Tavares, I. Tamborra and E. Vitagliano, Multimessenger Constraints on Radiatively Decaying Axions from GW170817,Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 101004 [2305.10327]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Vogel, R

    H. Vogel, R. Laha and M. Meyer,Diffuse axion-like particle searches,PoSNOW2018 (2019) 091 [1712.01839]

    2019 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Alves Batista and A

    R. Alves Batista and A. Saveliev,The Gamma-ray Window to Intergalactic Magnetism, Universe7 (2021) 223 [2105.12020]

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    T. R. Jaffe,Practical Modeling of Large-Scale Galactic Magnetic Fields: Status and Prospects,Galaxies7 (2019) 52 [1904.12689]

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Unger and G

    M. Unger and G. R. Farrar,The Coherent Magnetic Field of the Milky Way,Astrophys. J. 970 (2024) 95 [2311.12120]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Carenza, C

    P. Carenza, C. Evoli, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and D. Montanino,Turbulent axion-photon conversions in the Milky Way, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 023003 [2104.13935]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Payez, C

    A. Payez, C. Evoli, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and A. Ringwald,Revisiting the SN1987A gamma-ray limit on ultralight axion-like particles,JCAP02(2015) 006 [1410.3747]

    2015 arXiv

  55. [63]

    A.Lella,F.Calore,P.Carenza,C.Eckner,M.Giannotti,G.LucenteandA.Mirizzi, Probing protoneutron stars with gamma-ray axionscopes,JCAP11(2024) 009 [2405.02395]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    C. A. Manzari, Y. Park, B. R. Safdi and I. Savoray,Supernova Axions Convert to Gamma Rays in Magnetic Fields of Progenitor Stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 211002 [2405.19393]

    2024

  57. [65]

    Calore, P

    F. Calore, P. Carenza, C. Eckner, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, J. Jaeckel, K. Kotake, T. Kuroda, A. Mirizzi and F. Sivo,3D template-based Fermi-LAT constraints on the diffuse supernova axion-like particle background,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 063028 [2110.03679]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Kachelriess and J

    M. Kachelriess and J. Tjemsland,Detecting ALP wiggles at TeV energies,JCAP01(2024) 044 [2305.03604]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Kachelriess and J

    M. Kachelriess and J. Tjemsland,Photon-ALP oscillations with ELMAG,PoS CompTools2021(2022) 002

    2022

  60. [68]

    Majumdar, F

    J. Majumdar, F. Calore and D. Horns,Search for gamma-ray spectral modulations in Galactic pulsars,JCAP04(2018) 048 [1801.08813]

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    G. A. Pallathadka et al.,Reconciling hints on axion-like-particles from high-energy gamma rays with stellar bounds,JCAP11(2021) 036 [2008.08100]. 29 Training School Lecture Notes: WISPs in gamma-ray astrophysics Francesca Calore

    2021 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Xia, Y.-F

    Z.-Q. Xia, Y.-F. Liang, L. Feng, Q. Yuan, Y.-Z. Fan and J. Wu,Searching for the possible signal of the photon-axionlike particle oscillation in the combined GeV and TeV spectra of supernova remnants, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 123004 [1911.08096]

    2019 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Y.-F.Liang,C.Zhang,Z.-Q.Xia,L.Feng,Q.YuanandY.-Z.Fan, Constraintsonaxion-like particle properties with TeV gamma-ray observations of Galactic sources, JCAP06 (2019) 042 [1804.07186]

    2019 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Ajello et al.,Search for Spectral Irregularities due to Photon–Axionlike-Particle Oscillations with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys

    Fermi-LATCollaboration, M. Ajello et al.,Search for Spectral Irregularities due to Photon–Axionlike-Particle Oscillations with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 161101 [1603.06978]

    2016 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Libanov and S

    M. Libanov and S. Troitsky,On the impact of magnetic-field models in galaxy clusters on constraints on axion-like particles from the lack of irregularities in high-energy spectra of astrophysical sources,Phys. Lett. B802 (2020) 135252 [1908.03084]

    2020 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Abramowski et al.,Constraints on axionlike particles with H.E.S.S

    H.E.S.S.Collaboration, A. Abramowski et al.,Constraints on axionlike particles with H.E.S.S. from the irregularity of the PKS 2155-304 energy spectrum,Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 102003 [1311.3148]

    2013 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Zhang, Y.-F

    C. Zhang, Y.-F. Liang, S. Li, N.-H. Liao, L. Feng, Q. Yuan, Y.-Z. Fan and Z.-Z. Ren,New bounds on axionlike particles from the Fermi Large Area Telescope observation of PKS 2155-304, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 063009 [1802.08420]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Guo, H.-J

    J. Guo, H.-J. Li, X.-J. Bi, S.-J. Lin and P.-F. Yin,Implications of axion-like particles from the Fermi-LAT and H.E.S.S. observations of PG 1553+113 and PKS 2155−304,Chin. Phys. C45(2021) 025105 [2002.07571]

    2021 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Jedamzik and A

    K. Jedamzik and A. Saveliev,Stringent Limit on Primordial Magnetic Fields from the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 021301 [1804.06115]

    2019 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Wouters and P

    D. Wouters and P. Brun,Constraints on Axion-like Particles from X-Ray Observations of the Hydra Galaxy Cluster, Astrophys. J.772 (2013) 44 [1304.0989]

    2013 arXiv

  71. [79]

    M. Berg, J. P. Conlon, F. Day, N. Jennings, S. Krippendorf, A. J. Powell and M. Rummel, Constraints on Axion-Like Particles from X-ray Observations of NGC1275, Astrophys. J. 847 (2017) 101 [1605.01043]

    2017 arXiv

  72. [80]

    C. S. Reynolds, M. C. D. Marsh, H. R. Russell, A. C. Fabian, R. Smith, F. Tombesi and S. Veilleux,Astrophysical limits on very light axion-like particles from Chandra grating spectroscopy of NGC 1275, Astrophys. J.890(2020) 59 [1907.05475]

    2020 arXiv

  73. [81]

    M. C. D. Marsh, H. R. Russell, A. C. Fabian, B. P. McNamara, P. Nulsen and C. S. Reynolds,A New Bound on Axion-Like Particles, JCAP12(2017) 036 [1703.07354]

    2017 arXiv

  74. [82]

    J. P. Conlon, F. Day, N. Jennings, S. Krippendorf and M. Rummel,Constraints on Axion-Like Particles from Non-Observation of Spectral Modulations for X-ray Point Sources, JCAP07 (2017) 005 [1704.05256]. 30 Training School Lecture Notes: WISPs in gamma-ray astrophysics Francesca Calore

    2017 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Biteau and D

    J. Biteau and D. A. Williams,The extragalactic background light, the Hubble constant, and anomalies: conclusions from 20 years of TeV gamma-ray observations, Astrophys. J.812 (2015) 60 [1502.04166]

    2015 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Dominguez, M

    A. Dominguez, M. A. Sanchez-Conde and F. Prada,Axion-like particle imprint in cosmological very-high-energy sources,JCAP11(2011) 020 [1106.1860]

    2011 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Horns, L

    D. Horns, L. Maccione, M. Meyer, A. Mirizzi, D. Montanino and M. Roncadelli, Hardening of TeV gamma spectrum of AGNs in galaxy clusters by conversions of photons into axion-like particles, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 075024 [1207.0776]

    2012 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Montanino, F

    D. Montanino, F. Vazza, A. Mirizzi and M. Viel,Enhancing the Spectral Hardening of Cosmic TeV Photons by Mixing with Axionlike Particles in the Magnetized Cosmic Web, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 101101 [1703.07314]

    2017 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Buehler, G

    R. Buehler, G. Gallardo, G. Maier, A. Domínguez, M. López and M. Meyer,Search for the imprint of axion-like particles in the highest-energy photons of hard𝛾-ray blazars, JCAP 09(2020) 027 [2004.09396]

    2020 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Davies, M

    J. Davies, M. Meyer and G. Cotter,Constraints on axionlike particles from a combined analysis of three flaring Fermi flat-spectrum radio quasars, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 083027 [2211.03414]

    2023 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Davies, M

    J. Davies, M. Meyer and G. Cotter,Relevance of photon-photon dispersion within the jet for blazar axionlike particle searches, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 023017 [2112.08194]

    2022 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Liang, X.-F

    Y.-F. Liang, X.-F. Zhang, J.-G. Cheng, H.-D. Zeng, Y.-Z. Fan and E.-W. Liang,Effect of axion-like particles on the spectrum of the extragalactic gamma-ray background,JCAP11 (2021) 030 [2012.15513]

    2021 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Frederiks et al.,Properties of the Extremely Energetic GRB 221009A from Konus-WIND and SRG/ART-XC Observations, Astrophys

    D. Frederiks et al.,Properties of the Extremely Energetic GRB 221009A from Konus-WIND and SRG/ART-XC Observations, Astrophys. J. Lett.949 (2023) L7 [2302.13383]

    2023 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Burns et al.,GRB 221009A: The BOAT,Astrophys

    E. Burns et al.,GRB 221009A: The BOAT,Astrophys. J. Lett.946 (2023) L31 [2302.14037]

    2023 arXiv

  85. [93]

    P. K. Blanchard et al.,JWST detection of a supernova associated with GRB 221009A without an r-process signature, Nature Astron.8 (2024) 774 [2308.14197]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [94]

    D. D. Dzhappuev et al.,Swift J1913.1+1946/GRB 221009A: detection of a 250-TeV photon-like air shower by Carpet-2, The Astronomer’s Telegram15669(2022) 1

    2022

  87. [95]

    Cao et al.,Very high energy gamma-ray emission beyond 10 TeV from GRB 221009A,Sci

    LHAASO Collaboration, Z. Cao et al.,Very high energy gamma-ray emission beyond 10 TeV from GRB 221009A,Sci. Adv.9 (2023) adj2778 [2310.08845]

    2023

  88. [96]

    Gao, X.-J

    L.-Q. Gao, X.-J. Bi, J. Li, R.-M. Yao and P.-F. Yin,Constraints on axion-like particles from the observation of GRB 221009A by LHAASO, JCAP01 (2024) 026 [2310.11391]. 31 Training School Lecture Notes: WISPs in gamma-ray astrophysics Francesca Calore

    2024 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Galanti, L

    G. Galanti, L. Nava, M. Roncadelli, F. Tavecchio and G. Bonnoli,Observability of the Very-High-Energy Emission from GRB 221009A, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 251001 [2210.05659]

    2023 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Carenza and M

    P. Carenza and M. C. D. Marsh,On ALP scenarios and GRB 221009A, 2211.02010

    arXiv

  91. [99]

    Baktash, D

    A. Baktash, D. Horns and M. Meyer,Interpretation of multi-TeV photons from GRB221009A, 2210.07172

    arXiv

  92. [100]

    G. G. Raffelt, J. Redondo and N. Viaux Maira,The meV mass frontier of axion physics, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 103008 [1110.6397]

    2011 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Eckner and F

    C. Eckner and F. Calore,First constraints on axionlike particles from Galactic sub-PeV gamma rays,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 083020 [2204.12487]

    2022 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Mastrototaro, P

    L. Mastrototaro, P. Carenza, M. Chianese, D. F. G. Fiorillo, G. Miele, A. Mirizzi and D. Montanino,Constraining axion-like particles with the diffuse gamma-ray flux measured by the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 1012 [2206.08945]

    2022 arXiv

  95. [103]

    B. D. Blout, E. J. Daw, M. P. Decowski, P. T. P. Ho, L. J. Rosenberg and D. B. Yu,A Radio telescope search for axions, Astrophys. J.546 (2001) 825 [astro-ph/0006310]

    2001 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Regis, M

    M. Regis, M. Taoso, D. Vaz, J. Brinchmann, S. L. Zoutendijk, N. F. Bouché and M. Steinmetz,Searching for light in the darkness: Bounds on ALP dark matter with the optical MUSE-faint survey,Phys. Lett. B814 (2021) 136075 [2009.01310]

    2021 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Todarello, M

    E. Todarello, M. Regis, J. Reynoso-Cordova, M. Taoso, D. Vaz, J. Brinchmann, M. Steinmetz and S. L. Zoutendijke,Robust bounds on ALP dark matter from dwarf spheroidal galaxies in the optical MUSE-Faint survey,JCAP05(2024) 043 [2307.07403]

    2024 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Yin and K

    W. Yin and K. Hayashi,Indirect Detection of Decaying Dark Matter with High Angular Resolution: The Case for Axion Search by IRCS on the Subaru Telescope,Astrophys. J.960 (2024) 98 [2305.13415]

    2024 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Guo, Z.-Q

    W.-Q. Guo, Z.-Q. Xia and X. Huang,Constraining axion-like particles dark matter in Coma Berenices with FAST, Phys. Lett. B852 (2024) 138631 [2404.04881]

    2024 arXiv

  100. [108]

    J. W. Foster, M. Kongsore, C. Dessert, Y. Park, N. L. Rodd, K. Cranmer and B. R. Safdi, Deep Search for Decaying Dark Matter with XMM-Newton Blank-Sky Observations, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 051101 [2102.02207]

    2021 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Dessert, O

    C. Dessert, O. Ning, N. L. Rodd and B. R. Safdi,Resurrecting Hitomi for Decaying Dark Matter and Forecasting Leading Sensitivity for XRISM, Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 211002 [2305.17160]

    2024 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Dekker, E

    A. Dekker, E. Peerbooms, F. Zimmer, K. C. Y. Ng and S. Ando,Searches for sterile neutrinos and axionlike particles from the Galactic halo with eROSITA, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 023021 [2103.13241]. 32 Training School Lecture Notes: WISPs in gamma-ray astrophysics Francesca Calore

    2021 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Calore, A

    F. Calore, A. Dekker, P. D. Serpico and T. Siegert,Constraints on light decaying dark matter candidates from 16 yr of INTEGRAL/SPI observations,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 520 (2023) 4167 [2209.06299]

    2023

  104. [112]

    S. Roy, C. Blanco, C. Dessert, A. Prabhu and T. Temim,Sensitivity of JWST to eV-Scale Decaying Axion Dark Matter, 2311.04987

    arXiv

  105. [113]

    Janish and E

    R. Janish and E. Pinetti,Hunting Dark Matter Lines in the Infrared Background with the James Webb Space Telescope, 2310.15395

    arXiv

  106. [114]

    R. A. Battye, B. Garbrecht, J. I. McDonald, F. Pace and S. Srinivasan,Dark matter axion detection in the radio/mm-waveband,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 023504 [1910.11907]

    2020 arXiv

  107. [115]

    M. H. Chan,Constraining the axion–photon coupling using radio data of the Bullet cluster, Sci. Rep.11(2021) 20087 [2109.11734]

    2021 arXiv

  108. [116]

    J. L. Bernal, A. Caputo, G. Sato-Polito, J. Mirocha and M. Kamionkowski,Seeking dark matter with𝛾-ray attenuation, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 103046 [2208.13794]

    2023 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Caputo, A

    A. Caputo, A. Vittino, N. Fornengo, M. Regis and M. Taoso,Searching for axion-like particle decay in the near-infrared background: an updated analysis, JCAP05 (2021) 046 [2012.09179]

    2021 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Libanore and E

    S. Libanore and E. D. Kovetz,Upcoming searches for decaying dark matter with ULTRASAT ultraviolet maps, 2404.01500

    arXiv

  111. [119]

    Nakayama and W

    K. Nakayama and W. Yin,Anisotropic cosmic optical background bound for decaying dark matter in light of the LORRI anomaly, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 103505 [2205.01079]

    2022 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Carenza, G

    P. Carenza, G. Lucente and E. Vitagliano,Probing the blue axion with cosmic optical background anisotropies,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 083032 [2301.06560]

    2023 arXiv

  113. [121]

    J. L. Bernal, G. Sato-Polito and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmic Optical Background Excess, Dark Matter, and Line-Intensity Mapping, Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 231301 [2203.11236]

    2022 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Shirasaki,Searching for eV-mass Axion-like Particles with Cross Correlations between Line Intensity and Weak Lensing Maps,Phys

    M. Shirasaki,Searching for eV-mass Axion-like Particles with Cross Correlations between Line Intensity and Weak Lensing Maps,Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 103014 [2102.00580]

    2021 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Porras-Bedmar, M

    S. Porras-Bedmar, M. Meyer and D. Horns,Novel bounds on decaying axion-like-particle dark matter from the cosmic background, 2407.10618

    arXiv

  116. [124]

    Wang et al.,Spectroscopic search for optical emission lines from dark matter decay, Phys

    H. Wang et al.,Spectroscopic search for optical emission lines from dark matter decay, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 103007 [2311.05476]

    2024 arXiv

  117. [125]

    C. Sun, M. A. Buen-Abad and J. Fan,Probing New physics with high-redshift quasars: axions and non-standard cosmology,JCAP06(2024) 037 [2309.07212]. 33 Training School Lecture Notes: WISPs in gamma-ray astrophysics Francesca Calore

    2024 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Eckner,Tutorial on axion-like particle signatures in gamma-ray datasets for the 2nd Training School COST Action COSMIC WISPers (CA21106), Zenodo(2025)

    C. Eckner,Tutorial on axion-like particle signatures in gamma-ray datasets for the 2nd Training School COST Action COSMIC WISPers (CA21106), Zenodo(2025)

    2025

  119. [127]

    Meyer, J

    M. Meyer, J. Davies, J. Kuhlmann and C. Nigro,gammaalps: Conversion probability between photons and axions/axionlike particles,Zenodo (2021) . 34

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.