On the mean-field limit of Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck equations

Jinwook Jung; Li Chen; Peter Pickl; Zhenfu Wang

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 57 references

On the mean-field limit of Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck equations

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves quantitative propagation of chaos in L1 for Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck and Vlasov-Poisson limits, with explicit relative-entropy rates.

desk verdict Solid VPFP combination, but Theorem 1.3 is misstated as printed and the VP claim needs a proper σ_N→0 hypothesis. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.13038 v1 pith:4BGAFEKE submitted 2025-05-19 math-ph math.APmath.MP

Li Chen , Jinwook Jung , Peter Pickl , Zhenfu Wang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math-phmath.APmath.MP MSC 35Q8382C2282C4060H30

keywords propagationofchaosmean-fieldlimitVlasov-Poisson-Fokker-PlanckequationVlasov-PoissonrelativeentropyCoulombinteractionL1convergenceMcKean-Vlasovprocess

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a quantitative propagation of chaos result for systems of N Newtonian particles with a regularized Coulomb interaction, with or without velocity noise. It shows that the k-th marginal of the N-body distribution converges in L1 to the k-fold tensor product of the solution of the Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck equation when noise is present, or the Vlasov-Poisson equation when noise is absent or vanishing, at explicit rates. The main mechanism is controlling the relative entropy of the N-body density against the tensorized mean-field solution, using previously established probabilistic trajectory closeness between the true and mean-field flows. A reader should care because this gives strong, quantitative validation of effective kinetic equations from underlying many-body dynamics.

What carries the argument

The central object is the per-particle relative entropy $H_N(f_N^t \mid f_t^{\otimes N}) = \frac{1}{N}\int f_N^t \log\frac{f_N^t}{f_t^{\otimes N}}\,dZ_N$. Its time derivative is bounded by a sum of five error terms, each estimating a different source of discrepancy: the difference between true and mean-field trajectories, the difference between the true and regularized force fields, the regularization error, the law-of-large-numbers fluctuation of the empirical force, and the Lipschitz sensitivity of the kernel. Subadditivity of the scaled relative entropy plus the classical entropy-to-L1 inequality convert the entropy bound into L1 convergence of all marginals. The noise strength $\sigma$ appears in the denominator of the main bound, reflecting that the entropy-production term $\sigma \int |\nabla_v \log(f_N^t/f_t^{\otimes N})|^2 f_N^t$ is what absorbs force errors.

What would settle it

Run the N-particle system and the McKean-Vlasov flow for a smooth, compactly supported $f_0$ in $d=3$ with $\sigma=1$ and the truncated kernel (1.4), and measure the probability of the event $\sup_{t\in[0,T]} \|\Phi_N^t - \Psi_N^t\|_\infty > N^{-\delta}$. If this probability does not decay faster than any power of $N$ for some $\delta\in(0,1/3)$, Theorem 1.1's bound cannot hold as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that trajectory-level control is enough to upgrade weak propagation of chaos to strong L1 convergence for Vlasov-Poisson-type systems. Concretely, Theorem 1.1 states that for $\sigma>0$, $\sup_{0\le t\le T} H_N(f_N^t \mid f_t^{\otimes N}) \le C\exp(C\sqrt{\log N})/(\sigma N^{2\delta})$, and by the classical relative-entropy-to-L1 inequality and subadditivity this implies $\|f_N^{t,k} - f_t^{\otimes k}\|_{L^1}^2 \le 2k H_N(f_N^t \mid f_t^{\otimes N})$, so marginals converge in L1. Theorem 1.2 improves the rate in $d=3$ to $C(\log N)^{3/2}/(\sigma N^{2\lambda_2})$ using a mollified kernel. Theorem 1.3 extends the argument to the Vlasov-Poisson equation, giving $\sup_{0\le t\le T} H_N(f_N^t \mid \tilde f_t^{\otimes N}) \le C\sqrt{\sigma}(\sqrt{\sigma}+1)\exp(C\sqrt{\log N}) + C N^{-\delta}\log N$ against the $\sigma=0$ solution. The proof derives a differential inequality for the relative entropy whose error terms are controlled by the probability that true and effective trajectories stay $N^{-\delta}$-close.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the imported trajectory-comparison estimates, that true and mean-field trajectories stay $N^{-\delta}$- or $N^{-\lambda_2}$-close on $[0,T]$ with probability at least $1 - N^{-\alpha}$ for the stated ranges of $\delta$, $\lambda_1$, and $\lambda_2$, are valid; this paper takes those bounds as input and does not prove them, and without them the entropy inequalities break.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For fixed positive noise level, the one-particle marginal tends to the Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck solution in $L^1(\mathbb{R}^{2d})$ with rate $C/(\sqrt{\sigma}N^{\delta-})$, so the spatial density also converges in $L^1(\mathbb{R}^d)$.
In three dimensions with a mollified kernel, the convergence rate improves to polylogarithmic over $N^{2\lambda_2}$, with $\lambda_2 \in (3/10, 1/3)$.
When the noise strength tends to zero, the system can still converge to Vlasov-Poisson: Theorem 1.3 gives closeness to the $\sigma=0$ solution with error $C\sqrt{\sigma}\exp(C\sqrt{\log N}) + C N^{-\delta}\log N$.
For any fixed $k$, the $k$-marginal converges in $L^1$ with a constant linear in $k$, so the chaos is quantitative and uniform on the time interval $[0,T]$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If analogous trajectory-closeness estimates become available for first-order systems or for other singular kernels such as Riesz potentials, the entropy-transport argument in Sections 2 and 3 should transfer directly, giving L1 propagation of chaos there as well.
The $1/\sigma$ dependence in Theorem 1.1 suggests a quantitative transition: as noise vanishes, the Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck approximation degrades before the Vlasov-Poisson result takes over, with a crossover governed by $\sigma_N \gg N^{-2\delta}\exp(-C\sqrt{\log N})$.
The polylogarithmic improvement in Theorem 1.2 indicates that the mollified kernel mainly reduces the force-fluctuation error; one could test whether a different regularization achieves a rate closer to $N^{-2/3}$ in three dimensions.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Worth a look, especially for the VPFP part. The paper does what the abstract promises: it combines the Jabin–Wang relative entropy machinery with the trajectory closeness estimates of [10], [27], and [35] to get L1 propagation of chaos for regularized Coulomb systems. Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 are the real contribution. The entropy evolution computation is careful, the rate balancing checks out, and the authors are upfront that the trajectory controls are imported. That part is honest and the combination is new.

The soft spot is Theorem 1.3. The stress-test note is right. The proof in §3.2 ends with

d/dt H_N ≤ Cσ_N + C(N^{-δ}+√σ_N) exp(C√log N) + C N^{-δ}\log N,

so after integration the bound contains an N^{-δ} exp(C√log N) term and a plain σ_N term. The printed theorem instead says

sup H_N ≤ C√σ(√σ+1) exp(C√log N) + C N^{-δ}\log N,

no N^{-δ} exp term and no hypothesis that σ_N → 0. Worse, Theorem 1.3 inherits σ_N ≡ σ > 0 from Theorem 1.1. With σ fixed positive, the displayed bound doesn't go to zero, so the theorem as stated does not give convergence to Vlasov–Poisson. That's not a subtle gap; it's a statement/proof mismatch.

The fix is immediate: allow σ_N → 0 and print the integrated inequality from §3.2. With δ>0, N^{-δ} e^{C√log N} → 0, so the corrected bound does vanish. There's also a small sign/order issue in §3.3: the text says 'choosing σ_N := o(N^{-2δ} exp(C√log N))' but the preceding explicit bound needs σ_N large enough to kill the 1/(σ_N N^{2δ}) term, i.e. σ_N ≫ N^{-2δ} e^{C√log N}. Probably just a typo, but it should be fixed because someone will run into it.

I did not check every inequality in the entropy sections line by line, but the structure is coherent and I see no sign of a load-bearing error in the VPFP part. The reliance on [10], [27], [35] is a debt, not a flaw, since those are published results with stated assumptions; the paper acknowledges it.

In short: the VPFP result deserves a serious referee. The VP result as written does not. I'd send it to review with clear instruction that Theorem 1.3 must be restated with σ_N→0 and the correct integrated bound, and the §3.3 asymptotics cleaned up. After that it should be a solid paper.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies the mean-field limit of an N-particle Newtonian system with a regularized Coulomb interaction (a cut-off kernel or a smoothed kernel) and with white noise of strength σ_N. The effective equations are the Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck (VPFP) equation when σ_N converges to σ>0 and the Vlasov-Poisson (VP) equation when σ_N tends to zero. The authors prove quantitative propagation of chaos in relative entropy: for fixed positive noise, the scaled relative entropy between the N-particle law and the N-fold tensor product of the VPFP solution is bounded by C exp(C√log N)/(σ N^{2δ}) under a polynomial cut-off (Theorem 1.1), and an improved rate is given for a smoothed kernel in three dimensions (Theorem 1.2). For the vanishing-noise regime, Theorem 1.3 claims a relative entropy bound against the VP solution. The method combines the Jabin-Wang relative entropy approach with trajectory closeness estimates imported from [10, 27, 35], and then converts relative entropy into L1 convergence of marginals via Csiszár-Kullback-Pinsker and subadditivity.

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper yields quantitative strong (L1) propagation of chaos for singular kinetic equations with Coulomb-type interactions, going beyond the Wasserstein or convergence-in-probability statements previously available for these systems. The entropy computations are explicit and the rate balancing in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 checks out under the stated inequalities. The paper also credits and uses published trajectory-control results rather than reproving them, which is appropriate. The principal weakness is that Theorem 1.3 as printed does not match the estimate actually proved in Section 3.2, so the VP part of the paper needs a substantive correction before the central claim is reliable.

major comments (2)

[§3.2, Theorem 1.3] The bound stated in Theorem 1.3 is not the bound obtained by the proof. The proof ends with the differential inequality d/dt H_N(f_N^t|\tilde f_t^{⊗N}) + dissipation ≤ Cσ_N + C(N^{-δ}+√σ_N) exp(C√log N) + C N^{-δ} log N. Integrating over [0,T] and using H_N(0)=0 gives sup_{0≤t≤T} H_N ≤ C T σ_N + C T (N^{-δ}+√σ_N) exp(C√log N) + C T N^{-δ} log N. The theorem instead asserts C√σ(√σ+1) exp(C√log N) + C N^{-δ} log N and contains no hypothesis that σ_N tends to zero. Since Theorem 1.1, whose assumptions Theorem 1.3 inherits, fixes σ_N ≡ σ > 0, the passage to σ=0 is not justified as stated. For example, if σ_N = N^{-100} and δ = 1/4, the proof produces an N^{-δ} exp(C√log N) term that is much larger than the printed √σ_N exp(C√log N) term, so the claimed rate is unsupported. The theorem should be restated with the explicit hypothesis σ_N→0 and with the full integrated right-hand side (or an equivalent bound from which convergence follows).
[§3.3] The displayed chain in the alternative L1 proof is incorrect. It bounds ||f_t^{⊗N} - \tilde f_t^{⊗N}||_{L1}^2 by C H_1(f_t|\tilde f_t). By the same convexity/Csiszár-Kullback-Pinsker argument used in Remark 1.1, H(f_t^{⊗N}|\tilde f_t^{⊗N}) = N H_1(f_t|\tilde f_t), so the factor is N, not 1. In addition, the expression "σ_N := o(N^{-2δ} exp(C√log N))" is not a well-formed definition of a sequence. Since this subsection is presented as an alternative proof of L1 convergence to VP, it should be corrected or removed; the main proof of Theorem 1.3 does not depend on this remark.

minor comments (5)

[Theorem 1.2 statement] The statement writes H_N(f_N^t | f_t^{⊗k}); since H_N is defined between N-particle densities, the reference measure should be f_t^{⊗N}. In the proof, the notation also switches to \bar f_t^{⊗N} in the final estimate; please make the notation consistent.
[Proposition 2.2] Proposition 2.2 is stated for the regularized kernel (1.7), but it is invoked in the proof of Theorem 1.1, which uses the kernel (1.4). Please clarify which kernel the proposition concerns (presumably (1.4)) and adjust the cross-references.
[Equations (1.5)–(1.6)] The displayed consequence for the first marginal appears to invert the N- and σ-dependence: Remark 1.1 gives ||f^{N,1}_t - f_t||_{L1} = O(exp(C√log N)/(√σ N^δ)), not C√σ N^{δ-} as printed.
[Theorem 1.3 hypothesis] The assumption "for m>3" is unused in the statement; either remove it or state explicitly the intended polynomial moment/regularity condition on f0.
[Throughout] There are several typographical inconsistencies in the notation for the reference solution (f_t, \bar f_t, \tilde f_t) in the entropy estimates; a careful proofreading pass would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the relative entropy estimates are derived from imported, independently stated trajectory bounds; self-citations are load-bearing but not circular.

full rationale

No circular step is present. The derivation chain is explicit: the paper imports trajectory-closeness estimates (Theorem 2.1 from [10, Lemma 3.2]/[35, Theorem 4.2]; Theorem 2.2 from [27, Theorem 1.2]; the event estimates from [27, Proposition 3.2]) and uses the Jabin-Wang relative entropy framework [28] to turn the force discrepancy into a differential inequality for H_N. Each cited result has stated regularity and cut-off assumptions that do not include the relative entropy conclusion, so the citations—including those coauthored by Pickl and Wang—are independent evidence rather than a circular self-citation chain. Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 are not re-statements of the imported bounds: they combine entropy dissipation, LLN estimates, and the trajectory bounds to produce stronger quantitative rates. The VP case (Section 1) is explicitly stated without a full proof ('we will not carry out the full proof in the VP case but only state the result'): this is an omitted proof, not a circular reduction. A separate, non-circular correctness concern is that the printed Theorem 1.3 bound omits the N^{-δ} exp(C sqrt(log N)) and sigma_N terms that appear in the differential inequality at the end of Section 3.2, so the theorem statement as written does not follow from the displayed estimate; this is a statement/proof mismatch, not an input-output equivalence.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities, forces, particles, or conserved quantities are introduced. The free parameters are cut-off and rate exponents chosen by hand; all other inputs are standard assumptions on initial data, limiting PDE regularity, and previously published trajectory estimates.

free parameters (3)

Cut-off exponent delta = Theorem 1.1: delta in (0,1/d); Theorem 1.2: delta in [1/3, min((lambda1+3*lambda2+1)/6, (1-lambda2)/2))
Chosen by hand to balance the trajectory error, the law-of-large-numbers error, and the force regularization error. It is a rate parameter, not fitted to data, but the central bounds depend on it.
Rate exponent lambda2 = lambda2 in (3/10, 1/3) in Theorem 1.2
Chosen in an interval that makes the imported trajectory estimate from [27] and the entropy estimate compatible. The convergence rate in Theorem 1.2 is N^{-2*lambda2}.
Auxiliary exponent lambda1 = lambda1 in (0, lambda2/3) in Theorem 1.2
Introduced ad hoc in Theorem 1.2 to satisfy the cut-off interval condition together with lambda2.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Initial datum f0 satisfies f0 in L1∩L∞∩P2, finite entropy, and (1+|v|^2)^{m0/2} f0 in L∞; Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 add W^{1,1}∩W^{1,∞}, compact velocity support, and bounded log-gradient of f0.
These hypotheses are printed in Theorems 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 and are used to control densities, moments, and characteristic flows throughout the entropy estimates.
domain assumption The VPFP equation (1.3) and VP equation (3.2) admit unique solutions on [0,T] with density in L1∩L∞ and, for Theorem 1.3, with ∇rho-tilde in L1(0,T;L1∩L∞).
Used in estimates M2, K2, Lemma 3.1, and the trajectory comparisons; regularity for VPFP is quoted from [5,6,7] and for VP from the classical global existence theory.
domain assumption The trajectory comparison bounds of [10, Lemma 3.2], [27, Theorem 1.2], [35], [27, Lemma 2.6], and [27, Proposition 3.2] hold with N-independent constants for the specified cut-off exponents.
These imported results are the main engine that converts trajectory closeness into the force mismatch terms M_i and L_i in the relative entropy evolution. They are not proved in this paper.
standard math Standard inequalities are used without proof: Csiszár-Kullback-Pinsker, subadditivity of scaled relative entropy, Loeper's W2 stability estimate (2.6), Grönwall's lemma, Itô's formula, and the law-of-large-numbers estimate in Proposition 2.1.
These are standard background results invoked explicitly in Remark 1.1, Proposition 2.1, and the proofs of Theorems 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the mean-field limit of Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4BGAFEKE

@misc{pith2026250513038,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the mean-field limit of Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4BGAFEKE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.13038}
}

abstract

The derivation of effective descriptions for interacting many-body systems is an important branch of applied mathematics. We prove a propagation of chaos result for a system of $N$ particles subject to Newtonian time evolution with or without additional white noise influencing the velocities of the particles. We assume that the particles interact according to a regularized Coulomb-interaction with a regularization parameter that vanishes in the $N\to\infty$ limit. The respective effective description is the so called Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck (VPFP), respectively the Vlasov-Poisson (VP) equation in the case of no or sub-dominant white noise. To obtain our result we combine the relative entropy method from \cite{jabinWang2016} with the control on the difference between the trajectories of the true and the effective description provided in \cite{HLP20} for the VPFP case respectively in \cite{LP} for the VP case. This allows us to prove strong convergence of the marginals, i.e. convergence in $L^1$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

[10]

J. A. Carrillo, Y.-P. Choi and S. Salem, Propagation of c haos for the Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck equation with a polynomial cut-oﬀ, Commun. Contemp. Math., 21, (2019 ). 1850039

work page 2019
[27]

Huang, J.-G

H. Huang, J.-G. Liu and P. Pickl, On the mean-ﬁeld limit f or the Vlasov–Poisson–Fokker–Planck system, J. Stat. Phys., 181, (2020), 1915-1965

work page 2020
[35]

Lazarovici and P

D. Lazarovici and P. Pickl, A mean ﬁeld limit for the Vlasov–Poisson system , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 225 (2017), no. 3, 1201–1231

work page 2017
[1]

Batt, Global symmetric solutions of the initial value problem of stellar dynamics, J

J. Batt, Global symmetric solutions of the initial value problem of stellar dynamics, J. Diﬀerential Equations, 25, (1977), 342-364

work page 1977
[2]

Brenier, Convergence of the Vlasov-Poisson system to the incompressible Euler equations.” Communications in Partial Diﬀerential Equations 25, no

Y. Brenier, Convergence of the Vlasov-Poisson system to the incompressible Euler equations.” Communications in Partial Diﬀerential Equations 25, no. 3-4 (2000): 737-75 4

work page 2000
[3]

Duerinckx, and P-E

Bresch, Didier, M. Duerinckx, and P-E. Jabin. ”A duality method for mean-ﬁeld limits with singular interac- tions.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04695 (2024)

arXiv 2024
[4]

and Soler, J., 2023

Bresch, D., Jabin, P.E. and Soler, J., 2023. A new approac h to the mean-ﬁeld limit of Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equations. Analysis & PDE

work page 2023
[5]

Bouchut, F., Existence and uniqueness of a global smoot h solution for the Vlasov-Poisson-FokkerPlanck system in three dimensions, J. Funct. Anal., 1993, 111(1): 239–258

work page 1993

Show all 57 references

[6]

Degond, P., Global existence of smooth solutions for the Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equation in 1 and 2 space dimen- sions, Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4), 1986, 19(4): 519–542. /acute.ts1

1986
[7]

Victory, Jr. H. D., O’Dwyer, B. P., On classical solution s of Vlasov-Poisson Fokker-Planck systems, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 1990, 39(1): 105–156

1990
[8]

Bresch, P.-E

D. Bresch, P.-E. Jabin, and Z. Wang. On mean-ﬁeld limits a nd quantitative estimates with a large class of singular kernels: application to the patlak–keller–segel model. Comptes Rendus Mathematique , 357(9):708–720, 2019

2019
[9]

J. A. Carrillo, Y.-P. Choi and J. Jung, Quantifying the hy drodynamic limit of Vlasov-type equations with alignment and nonlocal forces, Math. Models Methods Appl. S ci., 31, (2021). 327-408

2021
[11]

L. Chen, A. Holzinger and X. Huo, Quantitative converge nce in relative entropy for a moderately interacting particle system on Rd, arXiv:2311.01980v1. MEAN-FIELD LIMIT OF VPFP 23

arXiv
[12]

L. Chen, A. Holzinger and A. J¨ ungel, Fluctuations arou nd the mean-ﬁeld limit for attractive Riesz potentials in the moderate regime, preprint
[13]

Choi and J

Y.-P. Choi and J. Jung, On weak solutions to the kinetic C ucker-Smale model with singular communication weights, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear
[14]

Dafermos

C.M. Dafermos. The second law of thermodynamics and sta bility. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 70: 167-179, 1979

1979
[15]

M., Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Conti nuum Physics, Vol

Dafermos, C. M., Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Conti nuum Physics, Vol. 325 of Grundlehren der Mathema- tischen Wissenschaften, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2000

2000
[16]

Duerinckx

M. Duerinckx. Mean-ﬁeld limits for some Riesz interact ion gradient ﬂows. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Anal- ysis, 48(3), 2269-2300, 2016

2016
[17]

and Wang, Z., 2023

Feng, X. and Wang, Z., 2023. Quantitative propagation o f chaos for 2d viscous vortex model on the whole space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05156

2023
[18]

Figalli and R

A. Figalli and R. Philipowski. Convergence to the visco us porous medium equation and propagation of chaos. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat , 4:185–203, 2008

2008
[19]

F. Golse. On the dynamics of large particle systems in th e mean ﬁeld limit. In Macroscopic and large scale phenomena: coarse graining, mean ﬁeld limits and ergodicit y, pages 1–144. Springer, 2016

2016
[20]

”Multidimensional high-ﬁeld limit of the electrostatic Vlasov–Poisson–Fokker–Planck system.” Jo urnal of Diﬀerential Equations 213, no

Goudon, Thierry, Juanjo Nieto, Fr´ ed´ eric Poupaud, an d Juan Soler. ”Multidimensional high-ﬁeld limit of the electrostatic Vlasov–Poisson–Fokker–Planck system.” Jo urnal of Diﬀerential Equations 213, no. 2 (2005): 418- 442

2005
[21]

”From Newton ’s second law to Euler’s equations of perfect ﬂuids.” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 149, no

Han-Kwan, Daniel, and Mikaela Iacobelli. ”From Newton ’s second law to Euler’s equations of perfect ﬂuids.” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 149, no. 7 (2021): 3045-3061

2021
[22]

Hauray and P.-E

M. Hauray and P.-E. Jabin, N-particles approximation o f the Vlasov equations with singular potential, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 183(3) (2007) 489–524

2007
[23]

Hauray and P.-E

M. Hauray and P.-E. Jabin, Particle approximation of Vl asov equations with singular forces: Propagation of chaos, Ann. Sci. /acute.ts1Ec. Norm. Sup /acute.ts1er. (4) 48(4) (2015) 891–940

2015
[24]

Hauray, and S

M. Hauray, and S. Mischler. On Kac’s chaos and related pr oblems. Journal of Functional Analysis , 266(10), 6055-6157, 2014

2014
[25]

and Wang, S., 2006

Xiao, L., Li, F. and Wang, S., 2006. Convergence of the Vl asov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck system to the incompress- ible Euler equations. Science in China Series A, 49, pp.255- 266

2006
[26]

and Wang, S., 2008

Hsiao, L., Li, F. and Wang, S., 2008. Monokinetic Limits of the Vlasov-Poisson/Maxwell-Fokker-Planck System. Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications, pp. 533-540

2008
[28]

Jabin, and Z

P.-E. Jabin, and Z. Wang. Mean ﬁeld limit and propagatio n of chaos for Vlasov systems with bounded forces. Journal of Functional Analysis , 271(12), 3588-3627, 2016

2016
[29]

Jabin and Z

P.-E. Jabin and Z. Wang. Mean ﬁeld limit for stochastic p article systems. In Active Particles, Volume 1 , pages 379–402. Springer, 2017

2017
[30]

Jabin and Z

P.-E. Jabin and Z. Wang. Quantitative estimates of prop agation of chaos for stochastic systems with W − 1, ∞ kernels. Inventiones mathematicae , 214(1):523–591, 2018

2018
[31]

Kang, From the Vlasov–Poisson equation with stro ng local alignment to the pressureless Euler–Poisson system, Appl

M.-J. Kang, From the Vlasov–Poisson equation with stro ng local alignment to the pressureless Euler–Poisson system, Appl. Math. Lett. 79 (2018) 85–91

2018
[32]

T. K. Karper, A. Mellet and K. Trivisa, Hydrodynamic lim it of the kinetic Cucker– Smale ﬂocking model, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 25 (2015) 131–163

2015
[33]

D. Lacker. Hierarchies, entropy, and quantitative pro pagation of chaos for mean ﬁeld diﬀusions. Probability and Mathematical Physics , 4(2), 377-432, 2023

2023
[34]

The microscopic foundations of Vlasov theory for jellium-like Newtonian N-body sys- tems

Kiessling, M.K.H., 2014. The microscopic foundations of Vlasov theory for jellium-like Newtonian N-body sys- tems. Journal of Statistical Physics, 155(6), pp.1299-132 8

2014
[36]

Y. Li, L. Chen, Z. Zhang, Convergence Towards the Population Cross-Diﬀusion System f rom Stochastic Many- Particle System , Commun. Math. Res. doi: 10. 4208/cmr. 2023-0002 Vol. 40, No . 1, pp. 43-63

2023
[37]

P. L. Lions, B. Perthame, Propagation of moments and reg ularity for the 3-dimensional Vlasov–Poisson system. Invent. Math. 105, (1991) 415–430

1991
[38]

Loeper, Uniqueness of the solution to the Vlasov-Poi sson system with bounded density, J

G. Loeper, Uniqueness of the solution to the Vlasov-Poi sson system with bounded density, J. Math. Pures Appl., 86, (2006), 68–79

2006
[39]

A. Majda. Compressible Fluid Flow and Systems of Conservation Laws in Several Space Variables . Springer, New York, 1984

1984
[40]

”From Vlasov-Poisson system to the in compressible Euler system.” Communications in Partial Diﬀerential Equations 26, no

Masmoudi, Nader. ”From Vlasov-Poisson system to the in compressible Euler system.” Communications in Partial Diﬀerential Equations 26, no. 9-10 (2001): 1913-1928. 24 CHEN, JUNG, PICKL, AND W ANG

2001
[41]

M´ el´ eard, and S

S. M´ el´ eard, and S. Roelly-Coppoletta. A propagation of chaos result for a system of particles with moderate interaction. Stochastic processes and their applications , 26, 317-332, 1987

1987
[42]

Miclo, and P

L. Miclo, and P. Del Moral, P. Genealogies and increasin g propagation of chaos for Feynman-Kac and genetic models. The Annals of Applied Probability , 11(4), 1166-1198, 2001

2001
[43]

Oelschl¨ ager

K. Oelschl¨ ager. A law of large numbers for moderately i nteracting diﬀusion processes. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Wahrschein- lichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete , 69(2):279–322, 1985

1985
[44]

Oelschl¨ ager

K. Oelschl¨ ager. A ﬂuctuation theorem for moderately i nteracting diﬀusion processes. Probability theory and related ﬁelds , 74(4): 591–616, 1987

1987
[45]

Oelschl¨ ager

K. Oelschl¨ ager. A sequence of integro-diﬀerential eq uations approximating a viscous porous medium equation. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Analysis und ihre Anwendungen, 20(1), 55-91, 2001

2001
[46]

Oelschl¨ ager

K. Oelschl¨ ager. Large systems of interacting particl es and the porous medium equation. Journal of diﬀerential equations, 88(2):294–346, 1990

1990
[47]

Oelschl¨ ager

K. Oelschl¨ ager. On the connection between Hamiltonia n many-particle systems and the hydrodynamical equa- tions. Archive for rational mechanics and analysis , 115, 297-310, 1991

1991
[48]

Olivera, A

C. Olivera, A. Richard, and M. Tomasevic. Quantitative particle approximation of nonlinear Fokker-Planck equations with singular kernel. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.00537 , 2020

2011 arXiv
[49]

Olivera, A

C. Olivera, A. Richard, and M. Tomasevic, M. Quantitati ve approximation of the Keller-Segel and Burgers equations by moderately interacting particles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.03177 , 2020

2004 arXiv
[50]

Pfaﬀelmoser, Global classical solutions of the Vlas ov-Poisson system in three dimensionsfor general initial data, J

K. Pfaﬀelmoser, Global classical solutions of the Vlas ov-Poisson system in three dimensionsfor general initial data, J. Diﬀerential Equations, 95, (1992) 281–303

1992
[51]

Philipowski

R. Philipowski. Interacting diﬀusions approximating the porous medium equation and propagation of chaos. Stochastic processes and their applications , 117(4):526–538, 2007

2007
[52]

S. Serfaty. Mean ﬁeld limit for coulomb-type ﬂows. Duke Mathematical Journal , 169(15):2887–2935, 2020

2020
[53]

S. Serfaty. Systems of points with coulomb interaction s. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathe- maticians: Rio de Janeiro 2018 , pages 935–977. World Scientiﬁc, 2018

2018
[54]

A. S. Sznitman. Topics in propagation of chaos. Lecture notes in mathematics , 165-251, 1991

1991
[55]

C. Villani. A review of mathematical topics in collisio nal kinetic theory. Handbook of mathematical ﬂuid dynamics , 1(71-305), 3-8, 2002

2002
[56]

Quasineutral limit of Euler–Poisson sy stem with and without viscosity

Wang, S., 2005. Quasineutral limit of Euler–Poisson sy stem with and without viscosity. Communications in Partial Diﬀerential Equations, 29(3-4), pp.419-456

2005
[57]

Yau, Relative entropy and hydrodynamics of Ginzburg-Landau mod els, Lett

H.-T. Yau, Relative entropy and hydrodynamics of Ginzburg-Landau mod els, Lett. Math. Phys., 22 (1991), no. 1, 63–80. (Li Chen) Institut f ¨ur Mathematik Universit¨at Mannheim, B6, 68159 Mannheim, Germany Email address : chen@math.uni-mannheim.de (Jinwook Jung) Department of M...

1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [10]

J. A. Carrillo, Y.-P. Choi and S. Salem, Propagation of c haos for the Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck equation with a polynomial cut-oﬀ, Commun. Contemp. Math., 21, (2019 ). 1850039

work page 2019

[2] [27]

Huang, J.-G

H. Huang, J.-G. Liu and P. Pickl, On the mean-ﬁeld limit f or the Vlasov–Poisson–Fokker–Planck system, J. Stat. Phys., 181, (2020), 1915-1965

work page 2020

[3] [35]

Lazarovici and P

D. Lazarovici and P. Pickl, A mean ﬁeld limit for the Vlasov–Poisson system , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 225 (2017), no. 3, 1201–1231

work page 2017

[4] [1]

Batt, Global symmetric solutions of the initial value problem of stellar dynamics, J

J. Batt, Global symmetric solutions of the initial value problem of stellar dynamics, J. Diﬀerential Equations, 25, (1977), 342-364

work page 1977

[5] [2]

Brenier, Convergence of the Vlasov-Poisson system to the incompressible Euler equations.” Communications in Partial Diﬀerential Equations 25, no

Y. Brenier, Convergence of the Vlasov-Poisson system to the incompressible Euler equations.” Communications in Partial Diﬀerential Equations 25, no. 3-4 (2000): 737-75 4

work page 2000

[6] [3]

Duerinckx, and P-E

Bresch, Didier, M. Duerinckx, and P-E. Jabin. ”A duality method for mean-ﬁeld limits with singular interac- tions.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04695 (2024)

arXiv 2024

[7] [4]

and Soler, J., 2023

Bresch, D., Jabin, P.E. and Soler, J., 2023. A new approac h to the mean-ﬁeld limit of Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equations. Analysis & PDE

work page 2023

[8] [5]

Bouchut, F., Existence and uniqueness of a global smoot h solution for the Vlasov-Poisson-FokkerPlanck system in three dimensions, J. Funct. Anal., 1993, 111(1): 239–258

work page 1993