Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 6 cited by

Selfless reduced free product $C^*$-algebras

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Voiculescu's free semicircular C*-algebras are selfless

desk verdict This paper settles the open problem of strict comparison for Voiculescu's free semicircular C*-algebras via a genuine new framework (rapid decay for filtrations), and it deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.13265 v2 pith:7JXO6AMJ submitted 2025-05-19 math.OA

Ben Hayes , Srivatsav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli , Leonel Robert This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.OA MSC 46L0546L1046L5446L35
keywords selflessC*-algebrasstrictcomparisonreducedfreeproductsrapiddecaypropertysemicircularsystemsAraki-WoodsalgebrascentralsequencealgebraII1factors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the reduced free product of two C*-probability spaces is selfless whenever both sides admit a rapid-decay filtration and the second side's GNS completion is either a II1-factor or has diffuse central sequence algebra. Selflessness is a strong regularity property which, for a tracial algebra, implies simplicity, uniqueness of the trace, stable rank one, and strict comparison of positive elements. The flagship instance is Voiculescu's free semicircular C*-algebras $S_n$: realized as reduced free products of copies of $(C([-2,2]),\text{semicircular measure})$, they are selfless for $n\ge 2$, and therefore have strict comparison, settling a question that had remained open. The proof also yields new selfless and purely infinite free Araki--Woods algebras, and a complete classification of selflessness for free products of two finite-dimensional abelian C*-algebras.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a C*-algebraic analogue of rapid decay: a filtration $(V_n)$ of subspaces with $V_0 = \mathbb{C}1$, $V_m V_n \subseteq V_{m+n}$, dense union, for which the operator norm on $V_n$ is bounded by a polynomial in $n$ times the 2-norm coming from the state. The paper shows this property survives reduced free products, using a Khintchine-type inequality of Ricard and Xu that controls the operator norm of alternating centered words by their 2-norm. Selflessness is then obtained through maps $\phi_{v_k}$ that conjugate one copy of $A_1$ by carefully chosen unitaries $v_k$ in $A_2$; the unitaries are asymptotically orthogonal to the filtration, which is guaranteed by the II1-factor or diffuse-central-sequence-algebra hypothesis, and this makes the maps asymptotically trace-preserving and asymptotically contractive, so a diagonal argument embeds $A_1 * A_2 * A_3$ into the ultrapower of $A_1 * A_2$.

What would settle it

Find a tracial state on $S_n$ ($n\ge 2$) other than the free semicircular trace. Selflessness implies the tracial state is unique, so any second tracial state would disprove Theorem A; a direct search could examine the diagonal embedding of the free product into its ultrapower and look for an invariant mean distinct from the free semicircular trace.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem C: if $(A_1,\rho)$ and $(A_2,\tau)$ are unital C*-probability spaces with $A_2$ separable and $\tau$ tracial, both admitting filtrations with the rapid decay property, and the GNS completion of $A_2$ is either a II1-factor or has diffuse central sequence algebra, then the reduced free product $A_1 * A_2$ is selfless. The theorem is proved by embedding a larger free product into the C*-ultrapower of $A_1 * A_2$, using conjugation maps $x \mapsto v_k x v_k^*$ by unitaries $v_k \in A_2$ that are asymptotically orthogonal to the filtration subspaces. From this criterion, Theorem A follows by identifying $S_n$ with the $n$-fold reduced free product of $(C([-2,2]),\text{semicircular distribution})$, whose GNS completion is $L^\infty([-2,2])$ with diffuse center. The paper also establishes permanence properties of rapid decay, purely infinite examples, and a necessary-and-sufficient classification for free products of finite-dimensional abelian C*-algebras.

Load-bearing premise

The proof needs the second factor's GNS completion to be either a II1-factor or an algebra with diffuse central sequence algebra; the boundary case of a diffuse algebra whose central sequence algebra is atomic is explicitly left open, and the construction of asymptotically orthogonal unitaries fails there.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Voiculescu's free semicircular C*-algebras $S_n$ for $n\ge 2$ have strict comparison, and being simple and monotracial their Cuntz semigroup is determined by the tracial simplex.
  • The free Araki--Woods C*-algebras $\Gamma(H_{\mathbb{R}}, U_t)$ with $\dim H_{\mathbb{R}} \ge 3$ and nontrivial one-parameter group are selfless, simple, and purely infinite.
  • Free products of the form $(M_m(\mathbb{C}),\rho_1) * (M_n(\mathbb{C}),\operatorname{tr})$ with $m,n\ge 2$ and $\rho_1$ faithful are selfless, and purely infinite when $\rho_1$ is nontracial.
  • A free product $(A,\tau_A) * (B,\tau_B)$ of finite-dimensional abelian C*-algebras is selfless exactly when $\dim(A)+\dim(B)\ge 5$ and $\tau_A(p)+\tau_B(q)<1$ for every pair of minimal projections $p,q$.
  • Reduced free products $C^*_\lambda(G) * A$ with $G$ an icc group with rapid decay and $A$ admitting a rapid-decay filtration become selfless in cases not previously reachable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the excluded boundary case (diffuse GNS completion with atomic central sequence algebra) can be handled by an extension of the same construction, Theorem C would become a dichotomy-free statement covering all separable rapid-decay tracial factors.
  • Because selflessness is preserved under reduced free products and direct limits, the same machinery may apply to free products of tracial algebras from compact quantum groups or measured spaces where rapid-decay filtrations are known but strict comparison was unexplored.
  • A natural test of sharpness is whether the classification in Theorem D persists when finite-dimensional abelian algebras are replaced by diffuse abelian algebras such as $C([0,1])$ with atomless measures; Theorem C already covers those, and the precise boundary may follow the same dimension-plus-trace pattern.
  • The explicit embedding of $A_1 * A_2 * A_3$ into $(A_1 * A_2)^\omega$ could be used to compute traces on the ultrapower, potentially clarifying the structure of the Cuntz semigroup of $S_n$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theory of rapid decay for filtrations on C*-probability spaces, proves permanence properties including preservation under reduced free products via the Ricard-Xu Khintchine-type inequalities, and uses this framework together with von Neumann algebraic techniques to prove selflessness of reduced free products under general hypotheses. The main advertised applications are Theorem A, that Voiculescu's free semicircular C*-algebras S_n are selfless for n≥2 and hence have strict comparison, together with new purely infinite examples and a classification of selfless reduced free products of finite-dimensional abelian C*-algebras (Theorem D). The central route is Theorem C (Theorem 7.1): if A1 and A2 have rapid decay filtrations and the GNS completion of A2 is either a II1-factor or has diffuse central sequence algebra, then A1*A2 is selfless.

Significance. If correct, Theorem A settles an open question on strict comparison for a canonical family of non-nuclear C*-algebras outside the reduced group C*-algebra class. The rapid decay framework for filtrations is a reusable tool, and the general criterion Theorem C is broad. The paper is careful and honest: it explicitly flags the unresolved diffuse-but-atomic central sequence algebra boundary case in Remark 7.5, and the main theorem is a forward derivation from established results with no fitted parameters. The proofs contain substantial and plausible technical work, especially the trace cross-term estimates in Theorem 6.4 and the finite-dimensional diagonal arguments in Section 7.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 7, proof of Theorem 7.1] In both cases of the verification of Theorem 6.4, the chosen subspaces do not satisfy the hypothesis 1∈bF_{n,k}: Case 1 uses bF_{n,k}=u_k^*(V_n⊖C1)u_k+V_n⊖C1 and Case 2 uses bF_{n,k}=V_n⊖C1. The repair is to adjoin C1, i.e. take bF_{n,k}=C1+u_k^*(V_n⊖C1)u_k+V_n⊖C1 (or simply bF_{n,k}=V_n in Case 2); the estimates are unchanged, and the additional scalar term is controlled by τ(u_k a)→0 from Proposition 7.2 or 7.3. This should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Section 7, Proposition 7.3] The sentence 'Replacing eh with f(eh) where f:R→[-1/2,1/2] is continuous and the identity on [-1/2,1/2], we may assume that ∥eh∥≤1/2' is not correct as written, because h=Ψ(t↦2πt) has spectrum in [-π,π], so f(eh) need not be a lift of h. One can either choose h=Ψ(t) with t∈[-1/2,1/2] before defining u_k=e^{2πi eh_k}, or simply use a bounded lift of h without the truncation, since boundedness of the lift is all that is needed.
  3. [Section 6, proof of Theorem 6.4] The 'diagonal argument' at the end of the proof is compressed. Since A1 is not assumed separable, the reader should be told explicitly how to pass from the double limit in (r,k) to a single family of maps satisfying the hypotheses of Proposition 2.1; one valid route is to take a free ultrafilter on the directed set N×N and use the finite intersection property of the sets on which the norm and trace estimates hold, or to use the uniformity in d∈V_n that the preceding estimates actually provide.
  4. [Section 7, proof of Theorem 7.1, first paragraph] When constructing the finite-dimensional filtration (V_n) of A2, the subspaces E_n^{(r)} should be chosen self-adjoint (e.g. by replacing them with E_n^{(r)}+(E_n^{(r)})^*), so that the resulting V_n is stable under the adjoint operation as required by the definition of a filtration.
  5. [Section 3.3, Example 2] There is a typographical error: 'if an only if' should read 'if and only if'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem A is derived forward from the paper's own rapid-decay and blueprint theorems, with no fitted or self-referential step.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Theorem A (Theorem 7.6) is obtained by identifying S_n as the reduced free product of n copies of (C([-2,2]), tau_sc), using the paper's own verification of rapid decay for the semicircular filtration (Example 6), the standard fact that the GNS completion of C([-2,2]) for an atomless measure is L^infinity([-2,2]) with diffuse center, and the paper's general Theorem 7.1 via the blueprint Theorem 6.4. The cited results from the third author's prior work [50] are permanence and structural properties of selflessness whose assumptions do not include the conclusion that S_n is selfless; they are used as general tools, not as a restatement of the target. Other external inputs such as Popa's Haar unitary theorem and Kirchberg-Rordam central sequence results are standard and do not encode the conclusion. No parameter is fitted to the target result, and the explicitly excluded boundary case in Remark 7.5 does not arise for C([-2,2]). Hence no step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a chain of established operator-algebraic theorems plus the newly introduced rapid decay definitions. No free parameters are fitted to data; numerical constants in the inequalities are universal and do not encode the conclusions. The only potentially heavy external inputs are Popa's ultrapower theorem, Kirchberg-Rordam central sequence surjectivity, Dykema's structural classifications, and Robert's prior permanence theorems for selflessness.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Ricard-Xu Khintchine type inequalities for reduced free products (Theorem 2.5 of [48])
    Basis for Lemma 4.4 and Theorem 4.5, giving L2 to operator norm estimates for words in free products.
  • standard math Popa's theorem on existence of a Haar unitary freely independent from a separable II1 factor in its tracial ultrapower [47]
    Used in Proposition 7.2 to construct unitaries with asymptotic orthogonality properties.
  • standard math Kirchberg-Rordam surjectivity of the central sequence map for C*-ultrapowers [35, Theorem 3.3]
    Used in Proposition 7.3 to lift unitaries from the central sequence algebra of the tracial ultrapower to the C*-ultrapower.
  • standard math Dykema's structural classifications of free products of finite-dimensional abelian C*-algebras and von Neumann algebras [18, Theorem 1], [16, Theorem 2.3], [21, Theorem 1]
    Used in Theorem D to reduce the finite-dimensional abelian case to settings where Theorem 7.1 applies.
  • domain assumption Permanence properties of selflessness from Robert [50, Theorems 3.1, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4]
    These prior results by the third author provide the definition, consequences, and stability of selflessness under free products, corners, and direct limits; the current paper relies on them without reproving them.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Selfless reduced free product $C^*$-algebras." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7JXO6AMJ

@misc{pith2026250513265,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Selfless reduced free product $C^*$-algebras},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7JXO6AMJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.13265}
}
abstract

We study selflessness in the general setting of reduced free products of $C^*$-algebras. Towards this end, we develop a suitable theory of rapid decay for filtrations in arbitrary $C^*$-probability spaces. We provide several natural examples and permanence properties of this phenomenon. By using this framework in combination with von Neumann algebraic techniques involving approximate forms of orthogonality, we are able to prove selflessness for general families of reduced free product $C^*$-algebras. As an instance of our results, we prove selflessness and thus strict comparison for the canonical $C^*$-algebras generated by Voiculescu's free semicircular systems. Our results also provide new examples of purely infinite reduced free products.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Selfless C*-correspondences, operator valued C*-probability spaces and completely positive maps

    math.OA 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A unified theory of selfless C*-correspondences is developed and applied to completely positive maps and conditional expectations, yielding new permanence, regularity, and absorption results.

  2. An isomorphism theorem for infinite reduced free products

    math.OA 2026-02 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The infinite reduced free product C^{*r∞} absorbs any 1-NCCW direct limit A with trivial K-theory, so A *r C^{*r∞} ≅ C^{*r∞}; in particular C([0,1])^{*r∞} ≅ Z^{*r∞}.

  3. The Selfless Dichotomy

    math.OA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Nonfaithful selfless C*-probability spaces are purely infinite and simple, so every selfless C*-algebra is either purely infinite or stably finite and hence pure.

  4. Selfless reduced $C^{*}$-algebras of linear groups

    math.OA 2026-02 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    For nontrivial linear groups, the reduced C*-algebra is selfless exactly when it is simple, i.e., when the group has trivial amenable radical.

  5. Some remarks on decay in countable groups and amalgamated free products

    math.GR 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Subexponential decay (SD) is introduced as a weakening of rapid decay; permanence of SD/RD under amalgamated free products is proved with sharp distortion bounds, with applications to selflessness of reduced C*-algebras.

  6. Strongly converging unitary representations for extensions by exact groups

    math.OA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Extensions by exact groups—semidirect products, abelian-base wreath products, graph wreath products, and certain free-by-cyclic groups—are shown to admit strongly converging finite-dimensional unitary representations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Strict comparison in reduced groupC∗-algebras, 2025

    Tattwamasi Amrutam, David Gao, Srivatsav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, and Gregory Patchell. Strict comparison in reduced groupC∗-algebras, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    An introduction to II1 factors.book in progress, 2016

    Claire Anantharaman and Sorin Popa. An introduction to II1 factors.book in progress, 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Tensor products and regularity proper- ties of Cuntz semigroups.Mem

    Ramon Antoine, Francesc Perera, and Hannes Thiel. Tensor products and regularity proper- ties of Cuntz semigroups.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 251(1199):viii–191, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Free products of C*-algebras.Trans

    Daniel Avitzour. Free products of C*-algebras.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 271(2):423–435, 1982

    1982

  5. [5]

    Mixed identities in linear groups — effective versions, 2025, in preparation

    Nir Avni and Tsachik Gelander. Mixed identities in linear groups — effective versions, 2025, in preparation

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Growth estimates for discrete quantum groups.Infin

    Teodor Banica and Roland Vergnioux. Growth estimates for discrete quantum groups.Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top., 12(2):321–340, 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Comparison theory for simple C*-algebras

    Bruce Blackadar. Comparison theory for simple C*-algebras. In David E. Evans and Masamichi Takesaki, editors,Operator Algebras and Applications, London Math. Soc. Lec- ture Note Ser., pages 21–54. Cambridge University Press, 1989

    work page 1989

  8. [8]

    Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006

    Bruce Blackadar.Operator algebras, volume 122 ofEncyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. Theory ofC∗-algebras and von Neumann algebras, Operator Algebras and Non-commutative Geometry, III

    work page 2006

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    A multiplicative ergodic theorem for von Neumann algebra valued cocycles.Comm

    Lewis Bowen, Ben Hayes, and Frank Lin. A multiplicative ergodic theorem for von Neumann algebra valued cocycles.Comm. Math. Phys., 384:1291–1350, 2021. 42 B. HAYES, S. KUNNA W ALKAM ELAYA V ALLI, AND L. ROBERT

    2021

  2. [10]

    Strong asymptotic freeness for free orthogonal quantum groups.Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, 57(4):708–720, 2014

    Michael Brannan. Strong asymptotic freeness for free orthogonal quantum groups.Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, 57(4):708–720, 2014

    2014

  3. [11]

    Carri´ on, James Gabe, Christopher Schafhauser, Aaron Tikuisis, and Stuart White

    Jos´ e R. Carri´ on, James Gabe, Christopher Schafhauser, Aaron Tikuisis, and Stuart White. Classifying∗-homomorphisms II.in preparation

  4. [12]

    Carri´ on, James Gabe, Christopher Schafhauser, Aaron Tikuisis, and Stuart White

    Jos´ e R. Carri´ on, James Gabe, Christopher Schafhauser, Aaron Tikuisis, and Stuart White. Classifying∗-homomorphisms I: Unital simple nuclear C*-algebras.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06480, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Uniform propertyΓ

    Jorge Castillejos, Samuel Evington, Aaron Tikuisis, and Stuart White. Uniform propertyΓ. Int. Math. Res. Not., 2022(13):9864–9908, 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    Introduction to the rapid decay property

    Indira Chatterji. Introduction to the rapid decay property. InAround Langlands correspon- dences, volume 691 ofContemp. Math., pages 53–72. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2017

    2017

  7. [15]

    J. Dixmier. Quelques propri´ et´ es des suites centrales dans les facteurs de typeII1.Invent. Math., 7:215–225, 1969

    1969

  8. [16]

    Kenneth J. Dykema. Free products of hyperfinite von Neumann algebras and free dimension. Duke Math. J., 69(1):97–119, 1993

    1993

  9. [17]

    Kenneth J. Dykema. Free products of finite-dimensional and other von Neumann algebras with respect to non-tracial states. InFree probability theory (Waterloo, ON, 1995), volume 12 ofFields Inst. Commun., pages 41–88. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997

    1995

  10. [18]

    Kenneth J. Dykema. Simplicity and the stable rank of some free productC∗-algebras.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 351(1):1–40, 1999

    1999

  11. [19]

    Kenneth J. Dykema. Purely infinite, simpleC∗-algebras arising from free product construc- tions. II.Math. Scand., 90(1):73–86, 2002

    2002

  12. [20]

    Dykema and Mikael Rørdam

    Kenneth J. Dykema and Mikael Rørdam. Projections in free product C*-algebras.Geom. Funct. Anal., 8(1):1–16, 1998

    1998

  13. [21]

    Dykema and Mikael Rørdam

    Kenneth J. Dykema and Mikael Rørdam. Projections in free product C*-algebras. II.Math. Z., 234(1):103–113, 2000

    2000

  14. [22]

    Folland.Real analysis

    Gerald B. Folland.Real analysis. Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, second edition, 1999. Modern techniques and their applications, A Wiley-Interscience Publication

    1999

  15. [23]

    A classification of finite simple amenableZ- stable C*-algebras, I: C*-algebras with generalized tracial rank one.C

    Guihua Gong, Huaxin Lin, and Zhuang Niu. A classification of finite simple amenableZ- stable C*-algebras, I: C*-algebras with generalized tracial rank one.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Soc. R. Can., 42(3):63–450, 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    A classification of finite simple amenableZ- stableC ∗-algebras, II:C ∗-algebras with rational generalized tracial rank one.C

    Guihua Gong, Huaxin Lin, and Zhuang Niu. A classification of finite simple amenableZ- stableC ∗-algebras, II:C ∗-algebras with rational generalized tracial rank one.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Soc. R. Can., 42(4):451–539, 2020

    2020

  17. [25]

    Complete growth functions of hyperbolic groups.Invent

    Rostislav Grigorchuk and Tatiana Nagnibeda. Complete growth functions of hyperbolic groups.Invent. Math., 130(1):159–188, 1997

    1997

  18. [26]

    An example of a non nuclear C*-algebra, which has the metric approximation property.Invent

    Uffe Haagerup. An example of a non nuclear C*-algebra, which has the metric approximation property.Invent. Math., 50(3):279–293, 1978

    1978

  19. [27]

    Quasitraces on exact C*-algebras are traces.C

    Uffe Haagerup. Quasitraces on exact C*-algebras are traces.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Soc. R. Can., 36(2-3):67–92, 2014

    2014

  20. [28]

    A new application of random matrices: Ext(C∗ red(F2))is not a group.Ann

    Uffe Haagerup and Steen Thorbjørnsen. A new application of random matrices: Ext(C∗ red(F2))is not a group.Ann. of Math. (2), 162(2):711–775, 2005

    2005

  21. [29]

    PierredelaHarpe.Groupeshyperboliques, alg` ebresd’op´ erateursetunth´ eor` emedeJolissaint. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math., 307(14):771–774, 1988

    1988

  22. [30]

    Free products of finite-dimensional and other von Neu- mann algebras in terms of free Araki-Woods factors.Adv

    Michael Hartglass and Brent Nelson. Free products of finite-dimensional and other von Neu- mann algebras in terms of free Araki-Woods factors.Adv. Math., 382:Paper No. 107656, 54, 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    Transitivity degrees of countable groups and acylindrical hy- perbolicity.Israel J

    Michael Hull and Denis Osin. Transitivity degrees of countable groups and acylindrical hy- perbolicity.Israel J. Math., 216(1):307–353, 2016

    2016

  24. [32]

    K-Theory, 2(6):723–735, 1989

    Paul Jolissaint.K-theory of reducedC∗-algebras and rapidly decreasing functions on groups. K-Theory, 2(6):723–735, 1989

    1989

  25. [33]

    Rapidly decreasing functions in reduced C*-algebras of groups.Trans

    Paul Jolissaint. Rapidly decreasing functions in reduced C*-algebras of groups.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 317(1):167–196, 1990

    1990

  26. [34]

    A. A. Kalyuzhnyi, G. B. Podkolzin, and Yu.˜A. Chapovsky. Harmonic analysis on a locally compact hypergroup.Methods Funct. Anal. Topology, 16(4):304–332, 2010. SELFLESS REDUCED FREE PRODUCTC ∗-ALGEBRAS 43

    2010

  27. [35]

    Central sequenceC∗-algebras and tensorial absorp- tion of the Jiang-Su algebra.J

    Eberhard Kirchberg and Mikael Rørdam. Central sequenceC∗-algebras and tensorial absorp- tion of the Jiang-Su algebra.J. Reine Angew. Math., 695:175–214, 2014

    2014

  28. [36]

    OnC ∗-algebras having linear, polynomial and subexponential growth.Invent

    Eberhard Kirchberg and Ghislain Vaillant. OnC ∗-algebras having linear, polynomial and subexponential growth.Invent. Math., 108(3):635–652, 1992

    1992

  29. [37]

    K-th´ eorie bivariante pour les alg` ebres de Banach et conjecture de Baum- Connes.Invent

    Vincent Lafforgue. K-th´ eorie bivariante pour les alg` ebres de Banach et conjecture de Baum- Connes.Invent. Math., 149(1):1–95, 2002

    2002

  30. [38]

    Strict comparison and stable rank one, 2024

    Huaxin Lin. Strict comparison and stable rank one, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Strongly convergent unitary representations of limit groups.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.08953, 2022

    Larsen Louder and Michael Magee. Strongly convergent unitary representations of limit groups.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.08953, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Strict comparison andZ-absorption of nuclear C*-algebras

    Hiroki Matui and Yasuhiko Sato. Strict comparison andZ-absorption of nuclear C*-algebras. Acta Math., 209(1):179–196, 2012

    2012

  33. [41]

    A short note on strong convergence ofq-Gaussians.Internat

    Akihiro Miyagawa. A short note on strong convergence ofq-Gaussians.Internat. J. Math., 34(14):Paper No. 2350087, 8, 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    F. J. Murray and J. Von Neumann. On rings of operators.Ann. of Math. (2), 37(1):116–229, 1936

    1936

  35. [43]

    Dixmier approximation and symmetric amenability forC ∗-algebras.J

    Narutaka Ozawa. Dixmier approximation and symmetric amenability forC ∗-algebras.J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, 20(3):349–374, 2013

    2013

  36. [44]

    Narutaka Ozawa and Marc A. Rieffel. Hyperbolic groupC∗-algebras and free-productC ∗- algebras as compact quantum metric spaces.Canad. J. Math., 57(5):1056–1079, 2005

    2005

  37. [45]

    K-groups of reduced crossed products by free groups.J

    Mihai Pimsner and Dan-Virgil Voiculescu. K-groups of reduced crossed products by free groups.J. Operator Theory, 8(1):131–156, 1982

    1982

  38. [46]

    Strong convergence for reduced free products.Infin

    Gilles Pisier. Strong convergence for reduced free products.Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top., 19(2):1650008, 22, 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    Free-independent sequences in type II1 factors and related problems.Ast´ erisque, 232:187–202, 1995

    Sorin Popa. Free-independent sequences in type II1 factors and related problems.Ast´ erisque, 232:187–202, 1995

    1995

  40. [48]

    Khintchine type inequalities for reduced free products and applications.J

    ´Eric Ricard and Quanhua Xu. Khintchine type inequalities for reduced free products and applications.J. Reine Angew. Math., 599:27–59, 2006

    2006

  41. [49]

    Classification of inductive limits of 1-dimensional NCCW complexes.Adv

    Leonel Robert. Classification of inductive limits of 1-dimensional NCCW complexes.Adv. Math., 231(5):2802–2836, 2012

    2012

  42. [50]

    Selfless C*-algebras.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.14188, 2023

    Leonel Robert. Selfless C*-algebras.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.14188, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    The stable and the real rank ofZ-absorbing C*-algebras.Int

    Mikael Rørdam. The stable and the real rank ofZ-absorbing C*-algebras.Int. J. Math., 15(10):1065–1084, 2004

    2004

  44. [52]

    International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics

    Walter Rudin.Functional analysis. International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, second edition, 1991

    1991

  45. [53]

    MarkSapir.Therapiddecaypropertyandcentroidsingroups.J. Topol. Anal., 7(03):513–541, 2015

    2015

  46. [54]

    Negative resolution to the C∗-algebraic Tarski problem, 2025

    Christopher Schafhauser and Srivatsav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli. Negative resolution to the C∗-algebraic Tarski problem, 2025

    2025

  47. [55]

    Free quasi-free states.Pacific J

    Dimitri Shlyakhtenko. Free quasi-free states.Pacific J. Math., 177(2):329–368, 1997

    1997

  48. [56]

    Equilibrium measures and capacities in spectral theory.Inverse Probl

    Barry Simon. Equilibrium measures and capacities in spectral theory.Inverse Probl. Imaging, 1(4):713–772, 2007

    2007

  49. [57]

    XXIII ofAmerican Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications

    G´ abor Szeg¨ o.Orthogonal polynomials, volume Vol. XXIII ofAmerican Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, fourth edition, 1975

    1975

  50. [58]

    Discrete cores of type III free product factors.Amer

    Yoshimichi Ueda. Discrete cores of type III free product factors.Amer. J. Math., 138(2):367– 394, 2016

    2016

  51. [59]

    Folner conditions, nuclearity, and subexponential growth inC∗-algebras

    Ghislain Vaillant. Folner conditions, nuclearity, and subexponential growth inC∗-algebras. J. Funct. Anal., 141(2):435–448, 1996

    1996

  52. [61]

    The property of rapid decay for discrete quantum groups.J

    Roland Vergnioux. The property of rapid decay for discrete quantum groups.J. Operator Theory, 57(2):303–324, 2007

    2007

  53. [62]

    Structural properties of reducedC∗-algebras associated with higher-rank lattices, 2025

    Itamar Vigdorovich. Structural properties of reducedC∗-algebras associated with higher-rank lattices, 2025

    2025

  54. [63]

    D. V. Voiculescu, K. J. Dykema, and A. Nica.Free random variables, volume 1 ofCRM Monograph Series. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1992. A noncommutative probability approach to free products with applications to random matrices, operator algebras and harmonic ...

    1992

  55. [64]

    Circular and semicircular systems and free product factors

    Dan Voiculescu. Circular and semicircular systems and free product factors. InOperator algebras, unitary representations, enveloping algebras, and invariant theory (Paris, 1989), volume 92 ofProgr. Math., pages 45–60. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1990

    1989

  56. [65]

    On the existence of quasicentral approximate units relative to normed ideals

    Dan Voiculescu. On the existence of quasicentral approximate units relative to normed ideals. I.J. Funct. Anal., 91(1):1–36, 1990

    1990

  57. [66]

    Math., 104(1):201– 220, 1991

    DanVoiculescu.Limitlawsforrandommatricesandfreeproducts.Invent. Math., 104(1):201– 220, 1991

    1991

  58. [67]

    TheK-groups of theC∗-algebra of a semicircular family.K-Theory, 7(1):5–7, 1993

    Dan Voiculescu. TheK-groups of theC∗-algebra of a semicircular family.K-Theory, 7(1):5–7, 1993

    1993

  59. [68]

    Abstract classification theorems for amenable C*-algebras.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03782, 2023

    Stuart White. Abstract classification theorems for amenable C*-algebras.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03782, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Structure of nuclear C*-algebras: from quasidiagonality to classification and back again

    Wilhelm Winter. Structure of nuclear C*-algebras: from quasidiagonality to classification and back again. InProceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, pages 1801–

  61. [1823]

    Department of Mathematics, University of Virginia 141 Cabell Drive, Kerchof Hall P.O

    World Scientific, 2018. Department of Mathematics, University of Virginia 141 Cabell Drive, Kerchof Hall P.O. Box 400137, Charlottesville, V A 22904 Email address:brh5c@virginia.edu Department of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive # 0112, La Jo...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.