Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Inflight calibration of SRG/ART-XC point spread function at large off-axis angles

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that the ART-XC telescope's scanning point spread function, measured on Sco X-1 and the Crab Nebula, matches the pre-launch ground calibration and can model the instrument's response out to about 50 arcminutes…

desk verdict Useful first in-flight calibration of the ART-XC slewing PSF, but the ground reference includes a calibration-only ring that the paper never masks, so the headline consistency claim needs to be revisited. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.13296 v1 pith:K2LNW6HQ submitted 2025-05-19 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HE

R. Krivonos , R. Burenin , E. Filippova , I. Lapshov , A. Tkachenko , A. Semena , I. Mereminskiy , V. Arefiev
show 7 more authors
A. Lutovinov B. D. Ramsey J. J. Kolodziejczak D. A. Swartz C.-T. Chen S. R. Ehlert A. Vikhlinin
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.HE
keywords X-rayastrophysicsinstrumentation:opticspointspreadfunctionin-flightcalibrationART-XCSRGslewingPSFall-skysurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes an in-flight calibration of the ART-XC X-ray telescope's point spread function at large off-axis angles, using bright sources observed while the telescope was scanning the sky. It shows that the 'slewing PSF' — the telescope response convolved with the 45-arcsecond detector pixels — is consistent with the pre-launch ground calibration of the mirror modules, and therefore can model the PSF out to off-axis distances of about 50 arcminutes in all-sky survey and scan modes. If the result holds, survey images can be corrected for the wide halos that bright sources imprint during slews, which is needed for detecting faint point sources and for measuring extended, low-surface-brightness X-ray emission. The paper also provides an analytic parametrization of the slewing PSF as a function of energy from 4 to 30 keV.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 'slewing PSF' (sPSF), defined as the ART-XC response obtained during scanning or all-sky survey observations: the optical PSF convolved with the flight detector's 45-arcsecond pixels, including the pixel-randomization step used in image reconstruction, and integrated over the survey scan geometry with its vignetting weighting. Because the pixel size is comparable to the on-axis half-power diameter, this convolved quantity is more stable than a pointed PSF and is the one actually relevant to survey images. For modeling, the ground PSF is represented by two components of an empirical inverse-power density profile $K(r,\sigma,\gamma)=(1+r^2/\sigma^2)^{-\gamma}$, and the flight sPSF by a Gaussian plus two such profiles; the paper tabulates the fitted parameters in nine energy bands from 4 to 30 keV. The comparison is carried out on radial surface-brightness profiles and enclosed-energy fractions, normalized within 3 arcminutes.

What would settle it

Compare the sPSF extracted from Sco X-1 with a pointed observation of the same source in which the telescope is held fixed and the image is rebinned to 45-arcsecond pixels; if the two profiles differ at radii of 20-150 arcseconds, the claim that the slewing PSF equals the ground PSF convolved with the detector pixel would be disproven.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the wide wing of the ART-XC point spread function, measured in flight, is the same geometric halo seen on the ground once detector-pixel convolution is accounted for. The radial profile of Sco X-1 in the 4-12 keV band follows the ground-calibrated profile beyond roughly 20 arcseconds, and the Crab Nebula's profile, extended inside about 150 arcseconds, agrees with Sco X-1 at larger radii. The resulting slewing PSF has a half-power diameter of about 48 arcseconds. Its enclosed-energy fraction is nearly independent of energy between 4 and 20 keV, which the paper interprets as evidence that the wide wings come from single-reflection geometry rather than from energy-dependent mirror-surface scattering.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that Sco X-1 is a true point source at 4-12 keV over the 20-150 arcsecond radii used for calibration, so any intrinsic extended emission or dust-scattered halo from Sco X-1 would be absorbed into the measured PSF rather than detected as disagreement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The calibrated slewing PSF can be used to subtract the halos of bright sources from ART-XC all-sky survey images, increasing sensitivity to faint point sources.
  • The same model applies to survey and scan modes, so observations with different slew patterns share a common PSF description out to about 50 arcminutes.
  • The 4-12 keV Crab profile matches the point-source PSF beyond about 150 arcseconds, meaning extended-source studies can use the calibrated PSF as the foreground model at large radii.
  • The energy-dependent parametrization from 4 to 30 keV lets survey data be analyzed in narrow energy bands without re-deriving the PSF each time.
  • The stray-light leak masks derived from the bright-source images can be applied to filter artifacts in general scientific observations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sPSF transfers directly from ground calibration for ART-XC, a similar transfer may hold for other grazing-incidence X-ray telescopes whose single-reflection wings are geometric, shortening future in-flight calibration campaigns.
  • The near energy-independence of the halo below 20 keV implies the same PSF model can be used to estimate and subtract unresolved X-ray background in cluster and Galactic-plane studies, an application the paper only gestures at.
  • A direct test of the point-source assumption would compare the Sco X-1 sPSF with the profile of a second bright, compact source observed at higher angular resolution; any mismatch inside 20 arcseconds would indicate intrinsic Sco X-1 structure absorbed into the calibration.
  • The band-wise parameter tables could be interpolated into a continuous energy-dependent PSF for event-by-event analysis, but the paper does not provide that step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper calibrates the far off-axis shape of the SRG/ART-XC point spread function using in-flight observations of Sco X-1 in all-sky survey mode and the Crab Nebula in scan mode. The authors reanalyze MSFC ground calibration data to extend the ground PSF to about 2000 arcsec, construct an averaged 'slewing PSF' (sPSF) by convolving the ground PSF with the flight detector pixel and vignetting weighting, and compare it with radial profiles extracted from the two bright sources in the 4-12 keV band. They report agreement between the ground-based sPSF and Sco X-1 beyond about 20 arcsec, use the Crab profile to identify extended emission inside about 150 arcsec, and provide a three-component analytic parametrization of the sPSF as a function of energy in nine bands from 4 to 30 keV. The central claim is that the slewing ART-XC PSF is consistent with MSFC ground calibration and can be used to model the PSF at large off-axis angles in survey and scan modes.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a flight-validated model of the ART-XC PSF out to roughly 50 arcmin, which is directly useful for removing halos of bright sources and for modeling extended emission in the all-sky survey and in pointed scanning observations. The reanalysis of the MSFC data extends the previously published ground calibration from 700 arcsec to the full CCD field of view, and the analytic parametrization across nine energy bands is a practical deliverable for the community. The paper uses a genuinely independent external benchmark (the MSFC ground measurement) rather than a purely self-calibrating loop, and it explicitly identifies and filters stray-light artifacts. However, the strength of the validation depends on several details that are not currently quantified or controlled, as detailed in the major comments.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Figs. 1 and 3] The manuscript explicitly states that the on-axis ground PSF contains a broad ring near 1000 arcsec produced by singly-reflected photons passing through a gap between the innermost hyperboloid shell and an inner baffle that was 'used only during calibration' and is absent in flight. The radial profile in Fig. 3 also notes an enhancement near 1000 arcsec. The MSFC sPSF used for comparison in Fig. 9 is obtained by averaging the ARTM0 PSF over offsets and azimuthal angles with vignetting weighting, but the text never states that this calibration-only ring was masked or subtracted before the average was formed or before the King-function fit. If the ring is present in the ground reference, then the flight data are being compared with a model that includes a known non-flight component, and any agreement near 1000 arcsec does not validate the ground model for flight use. The authors should either mask the ring region before constructing the MSFC sPSF or demonstrate explicitly that the ring does not affect the averaged sPSF; a simple radial masking test would resolve the concern.
  2. [Section 4, Fig. 9] The central consistency claim that the in-flight Sco X-1 sPSF 'follows the MSFC sPSF' is based on visual comparison of normalized radial profiles, with no goodness-of-fit statistic reported. The normalization is performed within a 3 arcmin aperture, which is an arbitrary choice, and the comparison extends to 2700 arcsec in Fig. 9. A quantitative residual analysis, such as chi-squared or a ratio profile with uncertainties over the full radial range, is needed to support the claim of consistency. The authors should also show how the conclusion changes when the normalization radius is varied, since the normalization region contains the core and inner wing where the ground and flight profiles already show some deviation.
  3. [Section 4] The point-source assumption for Sco X-1 is used in a mildly circular way: the paper states that Sco X-1 is consistent with a point source because it follows the MSFC sPSF, but the MSFC sPSF is the ground model that the in-flight measurement is meant to validate. Any intrinsic extended emission or dust-scattered halo from Sco X-1 would be absorbed into the calibrated sPSF. The authors should provide independent evidence for point-like behavior of Sco X-1 in the 4-12 keV band at the relevant radii, or quantify the possible contamination from a dust-scattering halo; the Crab comparison, which shows extended structure inside about 150 arcsec, indicates that such contamination is not automatically negligible.
  4. [Section 5.2 and Table 3] The analytic parametrization as a function of energy includes fits at the highest energy bands that appear poorly constrained. In Table 3, the E9 band gives sigma_core = 80 +/- 200 arcsec and sigma_halo = (1.68 +/- 1.60) x 10^3 arcsec, and the E8 band gives sigma_G = 26.7 +/- 6.0 arcsec with very large relative errors on the King parameters. These values indicate that the three-component model is degenerate or unconstrained at 19.2-30 keV. If the paper's claim is primarily that the sPSF shape is stable below about 12 keV and changes only in normalization above that, the text should say so explicitly; otherwise the E8-E9 parameters should not be presented as a validated parametrization.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Footnote 3 and Section 5.2] Footnote 3 states that the PSF wings at large distances are due to small-scale scattering from the optical surface and do not change between ground and orbit, while Section 5.2 concludes that the wings are dominated by purely geometric effects from singly-reflected photons and adduces the weak energy dependence as evidence against a microroughness-scattering origin. These two statements appear contradictory and should be reconciled.
  2. [Section 4, Fig. 10] The HPD values of 48 arcsec for Sco X-1 and 60 arcsec for the Crab Nebula are quoted without uncertainties; since the EEF curves are derived from the radial profiles shown in Fig. 9, error propagation should be provided.
  3. [Introduction and Section 5.2] There are typographical errors, including 'Ophiuhus' (should be 'Ophiuchus') and 'mirrror's' (should be 'mirror's'). In Table 3, the notation for products such as '(1.54 +/- 0.02)*10^-1' is ambiguous; consistent scientific notation would improve readability.
  4. [Section 4, Fig. 9 and Section 3] The figure caption for Fig. 9 does not state whether the in-flight radial profiles are background-subtracted and how the background regions were chosen for the flight images; this information is needed to assess the reliability of the profiles at the largest radii where the surface brightness is low.
  5. [Data Availability] The data availability statement indicates that the SRG/ART-XC data and software are private at the time of writing. For a calibration paper intended to provide a community PSF model, the absence of public access to the underlying data and analysis tools limits reproducibility, although the analytic parametrization in Table 3 is a useful partial substitute.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Mild logical circularity in the Sco X-1 point-source certification; the central ground-vs-flight comparison otherwise rests on an independent external MSFC benchmark.

  1. self definitional [Section 4, paragraph following Fig. 9; conclusion in Section 5.1]
    "As seen from the figure, Sco X-1 is consistent with a point source, since it follows the MSFC sPSF, however, the very central part deviates slightly compared to the ground measurements."

    The point-source status of Sco X-1 is justified by its agreement with the MSFC ground sPSF, which is the very model under inflight validation. The same Sco X-1 radial profile is then used to conclude that the inflight sPSF is consistent with ground calibration and can be used to model the PSF at large off-axis angles. Thus the model certifies the calibrator and the calibrator certifies the model, forming a closed justificatory loop. Any intrinsic extended emission or dust-scattered halo from Sco X-1 would be absorbed into the calibrated sPSF without breaking this loop. The circularity is mild because the MSFC ground measurement is an independent external benchmark and the Crab Nebula provides a second, independent reference at radii beyond about 150 arcsec.

full rationale

The central claim is that the slewing ART-XC PSF is consistent with MSFC ground calibration and can model large off-axis halos. The ground reference is an independent external measurement, not derived from the flight data, so the main comparison is not circular in the strong sense. The only significant circular step is the point-source certification of Sco X-1: the paper states that Sco X-1 is a point source because it follows the MSFC sPSF, and then uses Sco X-1 to validate that same MSFC sPSF. This is a logical loop, though a soft one, since the MSFC model does not depend on Sco X-1 for its construction. A separate correctness risk, not circularity, is explicitly admitted in Section 3: the ground ARTM0 PSF contains a broad ring near 1000 arcsec produced by a gap and inner baffle 'used only during calibration,' with the gap 'not present in the flight configuration'; the paper does not state that this calibration-only component was masked before averaging into the MSFC sPSF or fitting the King model, which could contaminate the large-off-axis comparison. The final analytic sPSF parametrization is explicitly fitted to Sco X-1 data and is presented as a calibration product rather than an independent prediction, so no fitted-input-called-prediction issue arises. Self-citations to [17] are ordinary references to the prior ground calibration and King-function form; they are not load-bearing in a way that forces the conclusion. Overall, the paper retains independent external content, so a score of 2 reflects one minor logical circularity rather than a fundamentally circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The slewing PSF is a derived calibration product, not a posited entity. The free parameters are the fitted constants of the empirical Gaussian and King models; they are the calibration output, so their fitted nature is expected, but they should not be mistaken for independent predictions.

free parameters (6)
  • Ground PSF core normalization N_core = 1.42 +/- 0.13 x 10^-3 arcsec^-2 (renormalized)
    Free normalization of the core King component in Eq. 2, fitted to averaged MSFC CCD ground data in Section 3.
  • Ground PSF core width sigma_core = 14.4 +/- 0.4 arcsec
    King function core scale fitted to MSFC ground data in Section 3.
  • Ground PSF wing fraction f_wing = 3.0 +/- 0.6 x 10^-4
    Relative weight of the wide King wing in Eq. 2, fitted to MSFC ground data.
  • Ground PSF wing width sigma_wing = 239 +/- 22 arcsec
    King function wing scale fitted to MSFC ground data.
  • sPSF three-component parameters (NG, sigma_G, N_core, sigma_core, gamma_core, N_halo, sigma_halo) = Nine energy bands in Table 3; e.g., E1: NG = 1.54e-1, sigma_G = 24.97, Ncore = 2.2e-2, sigma_core = 52, gamma_core =…
    Fitted to Sco X-1 radial profiles per energy band in Section 5.2, with gamma_halo fixed at 5. These are the calibration output, so fitted values are expected, but they are not independent predictions.
  • sPSF HPD values = 48 arcsec for Sco X-1 and MSFC; 60 arcsec for Crab
    Derived from the EEF curves in Figure 10 and used as summary metrics of the slewing PSF.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The two-component King function form (Eqs. 1-2) adequately represents the ground ART-XC PSF core and wings.
    Used as the model in Section 3; an empirical choice, not derived from optics. If the true PSF deviates from the King form, the inferred HPD and wing parameters would be biased.
  • domain assumption Sco X-1 is a point source at 4-12 keV at radii larger than about 20 arcsec.
    Section 4 and Figure 9: the inflight calibration derives the sPSF from the Sco X-1 radial profile. The paper asserts Sco X-1 is point-like partly because it follows the ground model that is being validated.
  • domain assumption The mirror PSF measured at MSFC at about 8 keV is representative of the 4-12 keV flight response when convolved with detector pixels.
    The consistency test in Figure 9 compares an 8 keV ground measurement with 4-12 keV flight data; Section 5.2 argues the sPSF shape is nearly energy-independent below 12 keV, but that argument uses the same inflight data.
  • domain assumption The ART-XC vignetting function used to build the ground sPSF is correct.
    Section 4: the MSFC sPSF is weighted by the ART-XC vignetting function, but the details of this weighting are not shown. A wrong vignetting model would break the ground-flight comparison.
  • domain assumption No significant changes to the mirror system occurred between ground calibration and orbit.
    The comparison in Figure 9 assumes the MSFC PSF shape applies on orbit after accounting for pixel size and vignetting. The paper notes the wings come from small-scale surface scattering and should not change, but this is an assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inflight calibration of SRG/ART-XC point spread function at large off-axis angles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K2LNW6HQ

@misc{pith2026250513296,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inflight calibration of SRG/ART-XC point spread function at large off-axis angles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K2LNW6HQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.13296}
}
read the original abstract

The knowledge of the point spread function (PSF) of the Mikhail Pavlinsky Astronomical Roentgen Telescope - X-ray Concentrator (ART-XC) telescope aboard the Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma (SRG) observatory plays an especially crucial role in the detection of point X-ray sources in the all-sky survey and the studies of extended X-ray objects with low surface brightness. In this work, we calibrate the far off-axis shape of the ART-XC PSF using in-flight data of Sco X-1 and the Crab Nebula, in all-sky survey or scan mode, respectively. We demonstrate that the so-called "slewing" ART-XC PSF (in contrast to the on-axis PSF), in convolution with the detector pixels, is consistent with ground calibration performed at the Marshall Space Flight Center, and can be used to model the PSF up to large off-axis distances in all-sky survey or scan modes. The radial profile of the Crab Nebula in the 4-12 keV band shows an extended structure out to ~150" and is consistent with Sco X-1 at larger off-axis angles. Finally, we performed an analytic parametrization of the slewing ART-XC PSF as a function of energy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SRG/ART-XC All-Sky X-ray Survey: Sensitivity Assessment Based on Aperture Photometry

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper presents an all-sky sensitivity map and web service that computes 4-12 keV upper-limit fluxes at any sky position from ART-XC survey data, using Poisson and Bayesian methods.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Its telescopes and first scientific results

    Sunyaev, R., Arefiev, V., Babyshkin, V., Bogomolov, A., Borisov, K., Buntov, M., Brunner, H., Burenin, R., Churazov, E., Coutinho, D., Eder, J., Eismont, N., Freyberg, M., Gilfanov, M., Gureyev, P., Hasinger, G., Khabibullin, I., Kolmykov, V., Komovkin, S., Krivonos, R., Lapshov, I., Levin, V., Lomakin, I., Lutovinov, A., Medvedev, P., Merloni, A., Mernik...

    arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    A&A 647, 1 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039313 arXiv:2010.03477 [astro-ph.HE]

    Predehl, P., Andritschke, R., Arefiev, V., Babyshkin, V., Batanov, O., Becker, W., B¨ ohringer, H., Bogomolov, A., Boller, T., Borm, K., Bornemann, W., Br¨ auninger, H., Br¨ uggen, M., Brunner, H., Brusa, M., Bulbul, E., Buntov, M., Burwitz, V., Burkert, W., Clerc, N., Churazov, E., Coutinho, D., Dauser, T., Dennerl, K., Doroshenko, V., Eder, J., Emberger...

    arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    A&A 650, 42 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/202040265 arXiv:2103.12479 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pavlinsky, M., Tkachenko, A., Levin, V., Alexandrovich, N., Arefiev, V., Babyshkin, V., Batanov, O., Bodnar, Y., Bogomolov, A., Bubnov, A., Buntov, M., Burenin, R., Chelovekov, I., Chen, C.-T., Drozdova, T., Ehlert, S., Filippova, E., Frolov, S., Gamkov, D., Garanin, S., Garin, M., Glushenko, A., Gorelov, A., Grebenev, S., Grigorovich, S., Gureev, P., Gur...

    work page arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    SRG/ART-XC Galactic Plane Survey near Galactic Longitude $l\simeq20^\circ$: Catalog of Sources

    Karasev, D.I., Semena, A.N., Mereminskiy, I.A., Lutovinov, A.A., Burenin, R.A., Krivonos, R.A., Sazonov, S.Y., Arefiev, V.A., Buntov, M.V., Lapshov, I.Y., Levin, V.V., Pavlinsky, M.N., Tkachenko, A.Y., Shtykovsky, A.E.: SRG/ART-XC Galac- tic Plane Survey near Galactic Longitude L=20 deg: Catalog of Sources. Astron- omy Letters 49(11), 662–672 (2023) https...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Semena, A., Mereminskiy, I., Lutovinov, A., Sazonov, S., Arefiev, V., Borisov, K., Burenin, R., Buntov, M., Garanin, S., Garin, M., Grigorovich, S., Karasev, D., Krivonos, R., Levin, V., Lapshov, I., Molkov, S., Pavlinsky, M., Shtykovsky, A., Semena, N., Sunyaev, R., Tkachenko, A., Vikhlinin, A., Voron, V.: SRG/ART- XC Galactic Bulge deep survey. II. Cata...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae189 2024

  6. [6]

    SRG/ART-XC all-sky X-ray survey: Catalog of sources detected during the first year

    Pavlinsky, M., Sazonov, S., Burenin, R., Filippova, E., Krivonos, R., Arefiev, V., Buntov, M., Chen, C.-T., Ehlert, S., Lapshov, I., Levin, V., Lutovinov, A., Lyapin, A., Mereminskiy, I., Molkov, S., Ramsey, B.D., Semena, A., Semena, N., Shtykovsky, A., Sunyaev, R., Tkachenko, A., Swartz, D.A., Vikhlinin, A.: SRG/ART-XC all-sky X-ray survey: Catalog of so...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    SRG/ART-XC all-sky X-ray survey: Catalog of sources detected during the first five surveys

    Sazonov, S., Burenin, R., Filippova, E., Krivonos, R., Arefiev, V., Borisov, K., Buntov, M., Chen, C.-T., Ehlert, S., Garanin, S., Garin, M., Grigorovich, S., Lapshov, I., Levin, V., Lutovinov, A., Mereminskiy, I., Molkov, S., Pavlinsky, M., Ramsey, B.D., Semena, A., Semena, N., Shtykovsky, A., Sunyaev, R., Tkachenko, A., Swartz, D.A., Uskov, G., Vikhlini...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    X-ray emission from Westerlund 2 detected by SRG/ART-XC and Chandra: search for radiation of TeV leptons

    Bykov, A.M., Uvarov, Y.A., Kalyashova, M.E., Badmaev, D.V., Lapshov, I.Y., Lutovinov, A.A., Mereminskiy, I.A., Semena, A.N.: X-ray emission from West- erlund 2 detected by SRG/ART-XC and Chandra: search for radiation of TeV leptons. MNRAS 525(1), 1553–1561 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stad2356 arXiv:2306.09960 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

Show all 22 references
  1. [9]

    ApJ 912(1), 17 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abec43 arXiv:2103.05728 [astro-ph.HE]

    Lutovinov, A., Tsygankov, S., Molkov, S., Doroshenko, V., Mushtukov, A., Arefiev, V., Lapshov, I., Tkachenko, A., Pavlinsky, M.: SRG/ART-XC and NuSTAR Observations of the X-Ray pulsar GRO J1008-57 in the Lowest Lumi- nosity State. ApJ 912(1), 17 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/...

    2021

  2. [10]

    A&A 661, 45 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 202141821 arXiv:2108.06365 [astro-ph.HE]

    Tsygankov, S.S., Molkov, S.V., Doroshenko, V., Mushtukov, A.A., Mereminskiy, I.A., Semena, A.N., Thalhammer, P., Wilms, J., Lutovinov, A.A.: SRG/ART-XC, Swift, NICER, and NuSTAR study of different states of the transient X-ray pul- sar MAXI J0903-531. A&A 661, 45 (2022) https:...

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    A&A 661, 21 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 202141147 arXiv:2106.14539 [astro-ph.HE]

    Doroshenko, V., Staubert, R., Maitra, C., Rau, A., Haberl, F., Santangelo, A., Schwope, A., Wilms, J., Buckley, D.A.H., Semena, A., Mereminskiy, I., Lutovi- nov, A., Gromadzki, M., Townsend, L.J., Monageng, I.M.: SRGA J124404.1- 632232/SRGU J124403.8-632231: New X-ray pulsar d...

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    A&A 661, 28 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141630 arXiv:2107.05587 [astro-ph.HE]

    Lutovinov, A.A., Tsygankov, S.S., Mereminskiy, I.A., Molkov, S.V., Semena, A.N., Arefiev, V.A., Bikmaev, I.F., Djupvik, A.A., Gilfanov, M.R., Karasev, D.I., Lapshov, I.Y., Medvedev, P.S., Shtykovsky, A.E., Sunyaev, R.A., Tkachenko, A.Y., Anand, S., Ashley, M.C.B., De, K., Kasl...

    2022

  5. [13]

    A&A 661, 33 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141813 arXiv:2107.05589 [astro-ph.HE] 16

    Mereminskiy, I.A., Mushtukov, A.A., Lutovinov, A.A., Tsygankov, S.S., Semena, A.N., Molkov, S.V., Shtykovsky, A.E.: Losing a minute every two years: SRG X- ray view of the rapidly accelerating X-ray pulsar SXP 1323. A&A 661, 33 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/20214181...

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Astron- omy Letters 48(12), 798–805 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377372211007X arXiv:2303.16645 [astro-ph.HE]

    Gorban, A.S., Molkov, S.V., Lutovinov, A.A., Semena, A.N.: Study of the X-ray Pulsar IGR J21343+4738 Based on NuSTAR, Swift, and SRG Data. Astron- omy Letters 48(12), 798–805 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377372211007X arXiv:2303.16645 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  7. [15]

    Astronomy Letters 49(5), 240–248 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773723050031

    Shtykovsky, A.E., Lutovinov, A.A., Krivonos, R.A., Gilfanov, M.R., Medvedev, P.S., Mereminskiy, I.A., Arefiev, V.A., Molkov, S.V., Sunyaev, R.A.: X-ray Halo of the Pulsar 4U 1538-52 from SRG Data. Astronomy Letters 49(5), 240–248 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773723050031

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    MNRAS 510(3), 3113–3118 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Krivonos, R., Arefiev, V., Lapshov, I., Filippova, E., Burenin, R., Semena, A., Grebenev, S., Sazonov, S., Shtykovsky, A., Tkachenko, A., Lutovinov, A.: Wide-field X-ray observations of the supernova remnant Puppis A with the SRG/ART-XC telescope. MNRAS 510(3), 3113–3118 (2022...

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Experimental Astronomy 44(1), 147–164 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-017-9555-0 arXiv:1708.09783 [astro-ph.IM]

    Krivonos, R., Tkachenko, A., Burenin, R., Filippova, E., Lapshov, I., Mereminskiy, I., Molkov, S., Pavlinsky, M., Sazonov, S., Gubarev, M., Kolodziejczak, J., O’Dell, S.L., Swartz, D., Zavlin, V.E., Ramsey, B.D.: Calibra- tion of the ART-XC mirror modules at MSFC. Experimental...

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    In: Takahashi, T., den Herder, J.-W.A., Bautz, M

    Levin, V., Pavlinsky, M., Akimov, V., Kuznetsova, M., Rotin, A., Krivchenko, A., Lapshov, I., Oleinikov, V.: ART-XC/SRG: status of the x-ray focal plane detector development. In: Takahashi, T., den Herder, J.-W.A., Bautz, M. (eds.) Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Ul...

    2014 doi

  11. [19]

    Part III

    Pavlinsky, M., Tkachenko, A., Levin, V., Krivchenko, A., Rotin, A., Kuznetsova, M., Lapshov, I., Krivonos, R., Semena, A., Semena, N., Serbinov, D., Shtykovsky, A., Yaskovich, A., Oleinikov, V., Glushenko, A., Mereminskiy, I., Molkov, S., Sazonov, S., Arefiev, V.: On-ground ca...

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    King, I.: The structure of star clusters. I. an empirical density law. AJ 67, 471 (1962) https://doi.org/10.1086/108756

    1962 doi

  13. [21]

    MNRAS 531(4), 4893–4899 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1393 arXiv:2310.06697 [astro-ph.HE]

    Mereminskiy, I., Lutovinov, A., Molkov, S., Krivonos, R., Semena, A., Sazonov, S., Tkachenko, A., Sunyaev, R.: Hard X-rays and QPO in Swift J1727.8-1613: the rise and plateau of the 2023 outburst. MNRAS 531(4), 4893–4899 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1393 arXiv:2310...

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    scan parkings

    Gaetz, T.J., Edgar, R.J., Jerius, D.H., Zhao, P., Smith, R.K.: Calibrating the 17 wings of the Chandra PSF. In: Flanagan, K.A., Siegmund, O.H.W. (eds.) X- Ray and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy XIII. Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conferenc...

    2004 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.