Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adaptive Visuo-Tactile Fusion with Predictive Force Attention for Dexterous Manipulation

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A force-guided attention module and future-force prediction auxiliary task improve visuo-tactile fusion for dexterous manipulation, reaching 93% average success in real robot trials.

arxiv 2505.13982 v2 pith:UHRO7B66 submitted 2025-05-20 cs.RO

Jinzhou Li , Tianhao Wu , Jiyao Zhang , Zeyuan Chen , Haotian Jin , Mingdong Wu , Yujun Shen , Yaodong Yang
show 1 more author
Hao Dong
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords attentiondifferentfusionmanipulationmodalityacrossadjustsdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Robots that manipulate objects need both eyes and a sense of touch, but using both well is hard. This paper, called AdapTac, lets the robot decide on its own how much to rely on its camera versus its tactile sensors at each moment. The key trick is to use the force the robot feels as a guide: when the robot is reaching for an object, vision is more useful; once it touches the object, force sensing becomes more important. AdapTac computes attention weights between the force signal and the visual and tactile features, so the policy can shift focus automatically.

The authors also add a secondary task during training: predicting the force the robot will feel a few moments in the future. This encourages the model to pay attention to touch and makes training more stable. At test time, this predicted future force, combined with the current force, guides the attention.

In real-world experiments with a robot arm and a dexterous hand, AdapTac succeeded 93% of the time across three tasks: opening a box, reorienting a cup, and flipping a sponge. It outperformed three baselines, including a vision-only policy and a method that simply concatenates visual and tactile features. The authors also show that attention weights shift from vision during reaching to touch during contact, as expected.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The method 'achieves an average success rate of 93% across three fine-grained, contact-rich tasks in real-world experiments' (abstract), beating RISE (73%), 3DTacDex-P (40%), and FoAR (50%) on the same tasks. If true, the force-guided attention and future-force prediction provide a label-free way to adaptively balance visual and tactile information in dexterous manipulation.

Load-bearing premise

The pretrained tactile encoder from 3DTacDex [3] is used without adaptation to produce tactile features Ztac that remain informative in the new sensor and task setup. The paper's own baseline 3DTacDex-P, which uses this encoder with concatenation, performs at 40%, below vision-only RISE (73%), suggesting that tactile features alone are not robustly transferable; if these features are unreliable, the attention and force-prediction modules built on top of them would not yield the reported gains.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The core method adds one learned auxiliary head and attention weights, but relies on several pretrained components and unstated hyperparameters. The claims rest on the transferability of the tactile encoder and on force as a clean control signal.

free parameters (2)
  • loss weight alpha
    Hyperparameter in Eq. 5 (L = L_pi + alpha * L_ffp) balancing the future force prediction loss; it is tuned by hand and its value is not reported.
  • task-specific contact thresholds (in FoAR baseline)
    For the FoAR baseline, thresholds are manually selected per task to label contact, a choice the authors criticize but use for comparison.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Net force F_n_O, the sum of all taxel forces transformed to camera frame, is a reliable indicator of contact and manipulation stage.
    Used to construct the query Q_F in Sections IV-A and IV-B; if force is noisy or poorly calibrated, the attention mechanism is misled.
  • ad hoc to paper The pretrained tactile encoder of 3DTacDex [3] provides transferable features Z_tac without fine-tuning.
    Used throughout; the poor baseline performance of 3DTacDex-P suggests this assumption may be fragile.
  • domain assumption Future net force is predictable from current visual and tactile features and is useful for guiding attention.
    The diffusion force head is trained to predict future force; if future force is not predictable, the query is corrupted.
  • domain assumption The 3D diffusion policy (RISE) is a suitable base policy and its action head works with fused features.
    Adopted as base architecture; no comparison with other policy backbones is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Adaptive Visuo-Tactile Fusion with Predictive Force Attention for Dexterous Manipulation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UHRO7B66

@misc{pith2026250513982,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Adaptive Visuo-Tactile Fusion with Predictive Force Attention for Dexterous Manipulation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UHRO7B66}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.13982}
}
read the original abstract

Effectively utilizing multi-sensory data is important for robots to generalize across diverse tasks. However, the heterogeneous nature of these modalities makes fusion challenging. Existing methods propose strategies to obtain comprehensively fused features but often ignore the fact that each modality requires different levels of attention at different manipulation stages. To address this, we propose a force-guided attention fusion module that adaptively adjusts the weights of visual and tactile features without human labeling. We also introduce a self-supervised future force prediction auxiliary task to reinforce the tactile modality, improve data imbalance, and encourage proper adjustment. Our method achieves an average success rate of 93% across three fine-grained, contactrich tasks in real-world experiments. Further analysis shows that our policy appropriately adjusts attention to each modality at different manipulation stages. The videos can be viewed at https://adaptac-dex.github.io/.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.13982 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. we naturally use vision to quickly locate the object, and rely on touch to precisely adjust finger placement and apply suitable force during contact. Similarly, for robots to effectively perform such tasks, it is essential to understand when, where, and how contact occurs, and to integrate this understanding with visual sensory information. Recent studies have focused on integrating visual and tactile sensors into r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pipeline. a) We use pretrained tactile encoder to encode 3D tactile. b) We use sparse encoder to encode the point cloud. c) The encoded visual and tactile features are used to predict the future net force. d) The predicted future net force is combined with the observed net force to guide visuo-tactile fusion through an attention mechanism. e) The fused action feature is used as a condition for learning the dexterous… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Visualization of Our Policy’s Rollout and Attention Weights on Three Contact-Rich Manipulation Tasks. Note: this view corresponds to the robot’s observation perspective, with point cloud data serving as the visual input. The bar below each image shows the attention weights assigned to the tactile (blue) and visual (purple) modalities, with the numbers indicating the exact weight values at each stage of manipulation.… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of Our Policy on Unseen Objects. in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mind Meets Space: Rethinking Agentic Spatial Intelligence from a Neuroscience-inspired Perspective

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Agent spatial intelligence is organized into six neuroscience-inspired modules, and the field is reviewed through that lens without any experimental validation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    See to touch: Learning tactile dexterity through visual incentives,

    I. Guzey, Y . Dai, B. Evans, S. Chintala, and L. Pinto, “See to touch: Learning tactile dexterity through visual incentives,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 13 825–13 832

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Learning visuotactile skills with two multifingered hands,

    T. Lin, Y . Zhang, Q. Li, H. Qi, B. Yi, S. Levine, and J. Malik, “Learning visuotactile skills with two multifingered hands,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16823, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Canonical representation and force-based pretraining of 3d tactile for dexterous visuo-tactile policy learning,

    T. Wu, J. Li, J. Zhang, M. Wu, and H. Dong, “Canonical representation and force-based pretraining of 3d tactile for dexterous visuo-tactile policy learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17549 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Dexterity from touch: Self-supervised pre-training of tactile representations with robotic play,

    I. Guzey, B. Evans, S. Chintala, and L. Pinto, “Dexterity from touch: Self-supervised pre-training of tactile representations with robotic play,” in Conference on Robot Learning . PMLR, 2023, pp. 3142– 3166

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Rotating without seeing: Towards in-hand dexterity through touch,

    Z.-H. Yin, B. Huang, Y . Qin, Q. Chen, and X. Wang, “Rotating without seeing: Towards in-hand dexterity through touch,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10880, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Dexterous In-Hand Manipulation of Slender Cylindrical Objects through Deep Reinforcement Learning with Tactile Sensing

    W. Hu, B. Huang, W. W. Lee, S. Yang, Y . Zheng, and Z. Li, “Dexterous in-hand manipulation of slender cylindrical objects through deep reinforcement learning with tactile sensing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05141, 2023

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    3d-vitac: Learning fine-grained manipulation with visuo-tactile sensing,

    B. Huang, Y . Wang, X. Yang, Y . Luo, and Y . Li, “3d-vitac: Learning fine-grained manipulation with visuo-tactile sensing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24091, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Learning in-hand translation using tactile skin with shear and normal force sensing,

    J. Yin, H. Qi, J. Malik, J. Pikul, M. Yim, and T. Hellebrekers, “Learning in-hand translation using tactile skin with shear and normal force sensing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07885 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Connecting touch and vision via cross-modal prediction,

    Y . Li, J.-Y . Zhu, R. Tedrake, and A. Torralba, “Connecting touch and vision via cross-modal prediction,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2019, pp. 10 609–10 618

    2019

  2. [10]

    Multimodal visual-tactile rep- resentation learning through self-supervised contrastive pre-training,

    V . Dave, F. Lygerakis, and E. R ¨uckert, “Multimodal visual-tactile rep- resentation learning through self-supervised contrastive pre-training,” in Proceedings/IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Au- tomation. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Masked visual- tactile pre-training for robot manipulation,

    Q. Liu, Q. Ye, Z. Sun, Y . Cui, G. Li, and J. Chen, “Masked visual- tactile pre-training for robot manipulation,” in2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 13 859–13 875

    2024

  4. [12]

    Modality-specific atten- tion attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch,

    S. Badde, K. T. Navarro, and M. S. Landy, “Modality-specific atten- tion attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch,” Cognition, vol. 197, p. 104170, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Foar: Force-aware reactive policy for contact-rich robotic manipulation,

    Z. He, H. Fang, J. Chen, H.-S. Fang, and C. Lu, “Foar: Force-aware reactive policy for contact-rich robotic manipulation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15753, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Learning from demonstration,

    S. Schaal, “Learning from demonstration,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , M. Mozer, M. Jordan, and T. Petsche, Eds., vol. 9. MIT Press, 1996. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper files/paper/1996/file/ 68d13cf26c4b4f4f932e3eff990093b...

    1996

  7. [15]

    End-to-end training of deep visuomotor policies,

    S. Levine, C. Finn, T. Darrell, and P. Abbeel, “End-to-end training of deep visuomotor policies,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 17, no. 39, pp. 1–40, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://jmlr.org/papers/v17/15-522.html

    2016

  8. [16]

    One-shot imitation learning,

    Y . Duan, M. Andrychowicz, B. Stadie, O. Jonathan Ho, J. Schnei- der, I. Sutskever, P. Abbeel, and W. Zaremba, “One-shot imitation learning,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  9. [17]

    Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion,

    C. Chi, S. Feng, Y . Du, Z. Xu, E. Cousineau, B. Burchfiel, and S. Song, “Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion,” in Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) , 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” arXiv preprint arxiv:2006.11239 , 2020

    2006 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware,

    T. Z. Zhao, V . Kumar, S. Levine, and C. Finn, “Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware,” in Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) , 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    The surprising effectiveness of representation learning for visual imitation,

    J. Pari, N. M. Shafiullah, S. P. Arunachalam, and L. Pinto, “The surprising effectiveness of representation learning for visual imitation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.01511 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    3d diffusion policy,

    Y . Ze, G. Zhang, K. Zhang, C. Hu, M. Wang, and H. Xu, “3d diffusion policy,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03954 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Rise: 3d perception makes real-world robot imitation simple and effective,

    C. Wang, H. Fang, H.-S. Fang, and C. Lu, “Rise: 3d perception makes real-world robot imitation simple and effective,” in 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , 2024, pp. 2870–2877

    2024

  15. [23]

    Learning robotic manipulation policies from point clouds with conditional flow matching,

    E. Chisari, N. Heppert, M. Argus, T. Welschehold, T. Brox, and A. Valada, “Learning robotic manipulation policies from point clouds with conditional flow matching,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07343 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Dexcap: Scalable and portable mocap data collection system for dexterous manipulation,

    C. Wang, H. Shi, W. Wang, R. Zhang, L. Fei-Fei, and C. K. Liu, “Dexcap: Scalable and portable mocap data collection system for dexterous manipulation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07788 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Perceiver-actor: A multi-task transformer for robotic manipulation,

    M. Shridhar, L. Manuelli, and D. Fox, “Perceiver-actor: A multi-task transformer for robotic manipulation,” in 6th Annual Conference on Robot Learning , 2022. [Online]. Available: https: //openreview.net/forum?id=PS eCS WCvD

    2022

  18. [26]

    Act3d: 3d feature field transformers for multi-task robotic manipulation,

    T. Gervet, Z. Xian, N. Gkanatsios, and K. Fragkiadaki, “Act3d: 3d feature field transformers for multi-task robotic manipulation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.17817, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space,

    C. R. Qi, L. Yi, H. Su, and L. J. Guibas, “Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  20. [28]

    Perceiver: General perception with iterative attention,

    A. Jaegle, F. Gimeno, A. Brock, O. Vinyals, A. Zisserman, and J. Carreira, “Perceiver: General perception with iterative attention,” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2021, pp. 4651–4664

    2021

  21. [29]

    4d spatio-temporal convnets: Minkowski convolutional neural networks,

    C. Choy, J. Gwak, and S. Savarese, “4d spatio-temporal convnets: Minkowski convolutional neural networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2019, pp. 3075–3084

    2019

  22. [30]

    General in-hand object rotation with vision and touch,

    H. Qi, B. Yi, S. Suresh, M. Lambeta, Y . Ma, R. Calandra, and J. Malik, “General in-hand object rotation with vision and touch,” in Conference on Robot Learning . PMLR, 2023, pp. 2549–2564

    2023

  23. [31]

    Connecting look and feel: Associating the visual and tactile properties of physical materials,

    W. Yuan, S. Wang, S. Dong, and E. Adelson, “Connecting look and feel: Associating the visual and tactile properties of physical materials,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2017, pp. 5580–5588

    2017

  24. [32]

    Digit: A novel design for a low-cost compact high-resolution tactile sensor with application to in-hand manipulation,

    M. Lambeta, P.-W. Chou, S. Tian, B. Yang, B. Maloon, V . R. Most, D. Stroud, R. Santos, A. Byagowi, G. Kammerer et al. , “Digit: A novel design for a low-cost compact high-resolution tactile sensor with application to in-hand manipulation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters...

    2020

  25. [33]

    Digitizing touch with an artificial multimodal fingertip,

    M. Lambeta, T. Wu, A. Sengul, V . R. Most, N. Black, K. Sawyer, R. Mercado, H. Qi, A. Sohn, B. Taylor et al. , “Digitizing touch with an artificial multimodal fingertip,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.02479 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Omnitact: A multi-directional high-resolution touch sensor,

    A. Padmanabha, F. Ebert, S. Tian, R. Calandra, C. Finn, and S. Levine, “Omnitact: A multi-directional high-resolution touch sensor,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 618–624

    2020

  27. [35]

    Covering a robot fingertip with uskin: A soft electronic skin with distributed 3-axis force sensitive elements for robot hands,

    T. P. Tomo, A. Schmitz, W. K. Wong, H. Kristanto, S. Somlor, J. Hwang, L. Jamone, and S. Sugano, “Covering a robot fingertip with uskin: A soft electronic skin with distributed 3-axis force sensitive elements for robot hands,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 3, no....

    2017

  28. [36]

    Anyskin: Plug-and-play skin sensing for robotic touch,

    R. Bhirangi, V . Pattabiraman, E. Erciyes, Y . Cao, T. Hellebrekers, and L. Pinto, “Anyskin: Plug-and-play skin sensing for robotic touch,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08276 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Re- skin: versatile, replaceable, lasting tactile skins,

    R. Bhirangi, T. Hellebrekers, C. Majidi, and A. Gupta, “Re- skin: versatile, replaceable, lasting tactile skins,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00071, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Bootstrap your own latent a new approach to self-supervised learning,

    J.-B. Grill, F. Strub, F. Altch ´e, C. Tallec, P. H. Richemond, E. Buchatskaya, C. Doersch, B. A. Pires, Z. D. Guo, M. G. Azar et al. , “Bootstrap your own latent a new approach to self-supervised learning,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Informa...

    2020

  31. [39]

    Multi-fingered in-hand manipulation with various object properties using graph convolutional networks and distributed tactile sensors,

    S. Funabashi, T. Isobe, F. Hongyi, A. Hiramoto, A. Schmitz, S. Sug- ano, and T. Ogata, “Multi-fingered in-hand manipulation with various object properties using graph convolutional networks and distributed tactile sensors,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 7, no. 2,...

    2022

  32. [40]

    Tacgnn: Learning tactile-based in-hand manipulation with a blind robot using hierarchical graph neural network,

    L. Yang, B. Huang, Q. Li, Y .-Y . Tsai, W. W. Lee, C. Song, and J. Pan, “Tacgnn: Learning tactile-based in-hand manipulation with a blind robot using hierarchical graph neural network,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 3605–3612, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Making sense of vision and touch: Self- supervised learning of multimodal representations for contact-rich tasks,

    M. A. Lee, Y . Zhu, K. Srinivasan, P. Shah, S. Savarese, L. Fei-Fei, A. Garg, and J. Bohg, “Making sense of vision and touch: Self- supervised learning of multimodal representations for contact-rich tasks,” in 2019 International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IE...

    2019

  34. [42]

    Maniwav: Learning robot manipulation from in-the-wild audio-visual data,

    Z. Liu, C. Chi, E. Cousineau, N. Kuppuswamy, B. Burchfiel, and S. Song, “Maniwav: Learning robot manipulation from in-the-wild audio-visual data,” in 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning , 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Robot synesthesia: In-hand manipulation with visuotactile sensing,

    Y . Yuan, H. Che, Y . Qin, B. Huang, Z.-H. Yin, K.-W. Lee, Y . Wu, S.-C. Lim, and X. Wang, “Robot synesthesia: In-hand manipulation with visuotactile sensing,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 6558–6565

    2024

  36. [44]

    Visuo- tactile pretraining for cable plugging,

    A. George, S. Gano, P. Katragadda, and A. Barati Farimani, “Visuo- tactile pretraining for cable plugging,” arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv–2403, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Self-supervised visuo-tactile pretraining to locate and follow garment features,

    J. Kerr, H. Huang, A. Wilcox, R. Hoque, J. Ichnowski, R. Calandra, and K. Goldberg, “Self-supervised visuo-tactile pretraining to locate and follow garment features,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.13042 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Visuo-tactile transformers for manipulation,

    Y . Chen, M. Van der Merwe, A. Sipos, and N. Fazeli, “Visuo-tactile transformers for manipulation,” in 6th Annual Conference on Robot Learning

  39. [47]

    Leap hand: Low-cost, efficient, and anthropomorphic hand for robot learning,

    K. Shaw, A. Agarwal, and D. Pathak, “Leap hand: Low-cost, efficient, and anthropomorphic hand for robot learning,” in Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) , 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Reconstructing hands in 3d with transformers,

    G. Pavlakos, D. Shan, I. Radosavovic, A. Kanazawa, D. Fouhey, and J. Malik, “Reconstructing hands in 3d with transformers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 9826–9836

    2024

  41. [49]

    Dexpilot: Vision-based tele- operation of dexterous robotic hand-arm system,

    A. Handa, K. Van Wyk, W. Yang, J. Liang, Y .-W. Chao, Q. Wan, S. Birchfield, N. Ratliff, and D. Fox, “Dexpilot: Vision-based tele- operation of dexterous robotic hand-arm system,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 9164–9170

    2020

  42. [50]

    Anyteleop: A general vision-based dexterous robot arm- hand teleoperation system,

    Y . Qin, W. Yang, B. Huang, K. Van Wyk, H. Su, X. Wang, Y .-W. Chao, and D. Fox, “Anyteleop: A general vision-based dexterous robot arm- hand teleoperation system,” in Robotics: Science and Systems , 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    On the continuity of rotation representations in neural networks,

    Y . Zhou, C. Barnes, J. Lu, J. Yang, and H. Li, “On the continuity of rotation representations in neural networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2019, pp. 5745–5753

    2019

  44. [52]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 30, 2017

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.