Rubidium-Doped KTiOPO$_4$ Waveguides as a Dual-Type Photon Pair Source

Josu\'e R. Le\'on-Torres; Markus Gr\"afe; Patrick Hendra; Valerio Flavio Gili

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 27 references

Rubidium-Doped KTiOPO$_4$ Waveguides as a Dual-Type Photon Pair Source

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read One rubidium-doped KTP waveguide phase-matches both type-0 and type-II photon-pair generation at once, with type-0 brightness reaching 13.14 MHz per mW per nm.

desk verdict Dual-type SPDC in Rb-doped KTP is experimentally solid, but the paper's key QPM-order claim rests on an unjustified equality of waveguide dispersion and is not uniquely determined by the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14269 v1 pith:QHTJDMIG submitted 2025-05-20 quant-ph physics.optics

Patrick Hendra , Josué R. León-Torres , Valerio Flavio Gili , Markus Gräfe This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-phphysics.optics PACS 42.65.Lm42.65.Wi

keywords spontaneousparametricdown-conversionperiodicallypoledKTPrubidium-dopedKTiOPO4quasi-phasematchingwaveguidephoton-pairsourcetype-0andtype-IISPDCtelecomwavelengthbrightness

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper demonstrates that a single rubidium-doped periodically poled KTiOPO$_4$ (PPRKTP) waveguide can generate two different photon-pair processes at once when pumped with 45° linearly polarized light. Type-0 SPDC, in which both down-converted photons share the pump polarization, is phase matched at the third grating order through the nonlinear coefficient $d_{33}$; type-II SPDC, in which one photon is orthogonally polarized, is phase matched at the first order through $d_{24}$. The measured effective type-0 brightness is $13.14\ \mathrm{MHz\, mW^{-1} nm^{-1}}$ ($28.76\ \mathrm{MHz\, mW^{-1} THz^{-1}}$), with an estimated intrinsic rate of $254.28\ \mathrm{MHz\, mW^{-1}}$, while type-II is about an order of magnitude less bright. The grating orders are extracted by solving the two phase-matching equations together at the temperature where their signal and idler wavelengths coincide. If the claim holds, the same compact waveguide can serve as a bright same-polarization pair source and as a type-II pair source for quantum communication at telecom wavelengths.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is quasi-phase matching (QPM) in a periodically poled waveguide: a $9.96\ \mu\mathrm{m}$ domain period supplies a reciprocal grating vector that compensates the phase mismatch of the nonlinear process. What makes the dual source work is that the same period simultaneously satisfies two different phase-matching equations, type-0 (both down-converted photons $z$-polarized, using $d_{33}$) and type-II (signal $z$-polarized and idler $y$-polarized, using $d_{24}$), by engaging different grating harmonics. The analysis subtracts the two phase-matching equations at the temperature where the signal and idler wavelengths coincide, which cancels the unknown common terms and fixes the harmonic orders as $m_x=3$, $m_y=1$ with $k_\mathrm{wg}=-0.056\ \mu\mathrm{m^{-1}}$. The same mechanism explains the brightness ordering: type-0's larger $d_{33}$ partially compensates the reduced efficiency of third-order QPM, while type-II's smaller $d_{24}$ leaves it fainter.

What would settle it

Fabricate or select waveguides with different poling periods and measure the SPDC spectral brightness for type-0 and type-II as a function of grating order. If the assignment is correct, the effective nonlinearity of third-order QPM should be roughly one third that of a first-order process with the same $d_{33}$; a measured ratio near unity, or a non-integer solution when the phase-matching equations are solved with independently measured $k_\mathrm{wg}$ values for each polarization, would disprove the claimed orders.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that concurrent type-0 and type-II SPDC in a single PPRKTP waveguide is achieved with a 45° linearly polarized pump: the vertical component drives type-0 via third-order quasi-phase matching with $d_{33}=18.5\ \mathrm{pm/V}$, and the horizontal component drives type-II via first-order quasi-phase matching with $d_{24}=3.92\ \mathrm{pm/V}$. Solving the phase-matching equations at 66 °C, where both processes meet at $\lambda_s=762.71\ \mathrm{nm}$ and $\lambda_i=863.45\ \mathrm{nm}$, gives grating orders $m_x=3$ and $m_y=1$ and a common waveguide phase mismatch $k_\mathrm{wg}=-0.056\ \mu\mathrm{m^{-1}}$. Temperature-resolved spectra show a bright type-0 degenerate peak near 67.5 °C and a weaker secondary degeneracy near 56 °C, while type-II stays non-degenerate from 20 to 75 °C. Coincidence measurements at 63.5 °C yield pair rates of $5.417\pm0.097\ \mathrm{MHz\, mW^{-1}}$ (type-0) and $1.195\pm0.005\ \mathrm{MHz\, mW^{-1}}$ (type-II), which become $10.834$ and $2.390\ \mathrm{MHz\, mW^{-1}}$ after the 50:50 splitter correction, and an estimated $254.28$ and $56.09\ \mathrm{MHz\, mW^{-1}}$ after loss corrections.

Load-bearing premise

The order assignment rests on assuming the waveguide phase-mismatch term $k_\mathrm{wg}$ is the same for type-0 and type-II SPDC at 66 °C; if the waveguide contribution differs between the $z$-polarized and $y$-polarized modes, the inferred orders $m_x=3$, $m_y=1$ would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A single PPRKTP waveguide can act as either a bright same-polarization pair source or a type-II pair source, with the choice made by rotating the pump polarization.
Pumping at 45° excites both processes simultaneously in one device, so a chip-scale source can provide two wavelength-disjoint pair channels at the same time.
The type-0 effective spectral brightness of $13.14\ \mathrm{MHz\, mW^{-1} nm^{-1}}$ is competitive with the integrated PPLN and LNOI sources listed in the paper's comparison table.
Because rubidium doping permits smaller and more precise poling periods, the same platform can be used to engineer other multi-process QPM combinations.
The temperature range from 54 to 70 °C allows tuning the type-0 process through degeneracy while the type-II process remains non-degenerate, giving separate spectral windows for filtering.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the same waveguide is pumped coherently at 45°, the output state could contain a superposition of type-0 and type-II amplitudes; testing for cross-process interference or polarization entanglement would be a natural next experiment, but the paper does not claim this.
The estimated intrinsic type-0 rate, $254.28\ \mathrm{MHz\, mW^{-1}}$, suggests that with improved fiber and pump coupling the source might reach or exceed the brightness of the longer dual-type waveguide in the comparison; that extrapolation goes beyond the reported measurements.
An independent measurement of waveguide dispersion for $z$- and $y$-polarized modes would either confirm the $m_x=3$, $m_y=1$ assignment or reveal that the two processes actually use different orders; this is a testable consequence of the paper's shared-$k_\mathrm{wg}$ assumption.
The temperature at which type-0 and type-II wavelengths cross could be used as a tuning knob to swap the roles of the two processes in a quantum network, a possibility not discussed by the authors.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The core result is a real experimental step: dual type-0 and type-II SPDC in a rubidium-doped KTP waveguide, a platform not shown before. The spectra, coincidence counts, and CAR measurements are carefully done; the linear fits have high R² and the brightness numbers are placed in context against prior PPKTP and PPLN sources. The comparison with Chen et al. is honest, and the paper is clearly written.

The main soft spot is Section 3.3, the QPM-order determination. The authors assume the waveguide phase-mismatch term kwg is identical for the two processes because the signal and idler wavelengths coincide at 66 °C. That equality is not justified: the idler polarization differs (z for type-0, y for type-II), and waveguide dispersion is generally polarization-dependent. If kwg differs between the two processes, the two equations contain four unknowns and the pair (mx,my)=(3,1) is not determined. Even granting the equality, the subtraction only fixes the difference mx - my = 2, so (5,3) satisfies the equations just as well as (3,1). The abstract's central claim—third-order type-0 and first-order type-II QPM—is therefore not established by the presented data. The authors need an independent check of the waveguide contribution, a more complete model, or a much more cautious statement of the required orders.

A minor overstatement: the abstract says both processes are 'concurrently excited' by a 45° pump, but the measurements shown are for separate vertical and horizontal pump polarizations. Simultaneous excitation is plausible but not demonstrated in the data.

For a quantum-photonics audience, this is a useful data point on a new material platform, but the QPM-order claim needs to be fixed or softened. I would send it to peer review—the experiment is sound enough to warrant referee time—but I would not cite the QPM orders in their current form. The authors should either supply the missing constraint or present the orders as a tentative assignment.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experimental characterization of periodically poled Rb-doped KTiOPO4 (PPRKTP) waveguides as a source of both type-0 and type-II spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC). The authors measure temperature-dependent SPDC spectra, coincidence rates as a function of pump power, and coincidence-to-accidental ratios. From the phase-matching equations, they infer that type-0 SPDC is quasi-phase-matched via the third-order grating harmonic using d33 and type-II SPDC via the first-order harmonic using d24. They report an effective type-0 pair rate of 13.14 MHz mW−1 nm−1 (28.76 MHz mW−1 THz−1) and an intrinsic rate of 254.28 MHz mW−1 for type-0. The central claim of the paper is the specific QPM order assignment for the two processes.

Significance. If the QPM-order assignment is valid, the work provides a useful demonstration of a dual-type photon-pair source in Rb-doped KTP waveguides, a material that enables smaller poling periods and potentially lower loss. The experimental data are of good quality: the coincidence-vs-power fits have R²=0.998 and 0.999, and the temperature-dependent spectral maps clearly show distinct type-0 and type-II behaviors. However, the paper's most distinctive claim—the specific QPM orders for the two processes—is not uniquely determined by the data as presented, because it rests on an unvalidated assumption about the waveguide phase-mismatch term. The intrinsic-rate estimates also lack uncertainty propagation. These issues do not invalidate the observation of dual-type SPDC, but they weaken the stronger conclusions drawn in the abstract and conclusion.

major comments (2)

[Section 3.3, Eqs. (9)–(11)] The determination of QPM orders mx=3 and my=1 relies on the assumption that the waveguide phase-mismatch term kwg is identical for the type-0 and type-II processes at the 66°C intersection. The paper justifies this by noting that the signal and idler wavelengths are identical for both SPDC types at that temperature. However, the idler polarizations differ: type-0 uses a z-polarized idler, while type-II uses a y-polarized idler. Waveguide modal propagation constants are polarization-dependent in an ion-exchanged channel waveguide, so equal wavelengths do not imply equal kwg. If the two kwg values differ by Δkwg, the subtraction in Eq. (11) becomes my = mx − 2.01 + Δkwg/0.63, and the data no longer uniquely select (mx, my) = (3, 1). The paper needs to provide an independent determination of kwg for each polarization (e.g., from a known QPM process on the same waveguide, or from numerical mode solving) or at least a sensitivity analysis with respect to Δkwg. Without this, the abstract and conclusion's central claim is not fully supported.
[Abstract and Section 2] The abstract and conclusion state that by coupling a 45° linearly polarized pump laser, both type-0 and type-II SPDC are concurrently excited in the waveguide. The experimental section, however, describes separate measurements with vertically polarized pump light for type-0 and horizontally polarized pump light for type-II, and the spectral maps in Fig. 2 were obtained with those single polarizations. No data are shown for a 45° pump. Since the paper is titled a 'Dual-Type Photon Pair Source' and the abstract emphasizes concurrent generation, the authors should either present explicit data (e.g., a spectrum or coincidence measurement with 45° pump) or rephrase the claim to indicate that the two processes are separately excitable in the same waveguide, with the 45° scheme as an operational possibility.

minor comments (5)

[Section 3.3, Eq. (6)] The temperature correction Δn(T,λ) = n1(T−25°C) + n2(T−25°C) appears dimensionally incomplete; the second term should likely be n2(T−25°C)². Please correct the formula.
[Section 2 and 3.2] The text uses 'low-pass filters (LPFs)' with a cut-off at 647 nm to suppress the 405 nm pump, but a filter that transmits wavelengths above 647 nm is a long-pass filter. The later text in Section 3.2 correctly says 'long-pass filters.' Please fix the terminology in Section 2.
[Table 1, reference [8]] The table entry for 'Steiner et al. (2021)' lists '20 GHz' as a pair generation rate, which is not in the same units as the other entries and needs clarification. Also, reference [8] has an incomplete title: 'Quasi-phase-matched concurrent nonlinearities in periodically poled for quantum computing over the optical frequency comb' is missing the crystal name.
[Section 3.2] The x-axis of Fig. 3(a) is labeled 'input pump power'; please specify whether this is the power measured before the coupling lens or the power coupled into the waveguide. This matters because the intrinsic rate calculation uses a 35% pump coupling efficiency.
[Section 3.3, final paragraph] The text states that Chen et al. [10] used 'zeroth-order' QPM for type-0. QPM orders conventionally start at 1; 'zeroth-order' would correspond to no poling. Please clarify what is meant here.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the QPM-order assignment is inferred from measured wavelengths and literature dispersion data, not from a fitted target or self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is the assignment of QPM orders in Sec. 3.3. There, measured signal and idler wavelengths at 66°C are inserted into the two phase-matching equations along with the fixed poling period Λ=9.96 µm and literature Sellmeier/temperature coefficients. Subtracting the two equations cancels the shared kwg term, giving my = mx − 2.01, and the pair (mx=3, my=1) is selected using positive-integer and odd-order constraints. This is a parameter-free inference from measured spectra, not a quantity that is defined in terms of the result it claims to predict. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: kwg is solved for after the order assignment, and the reported pair rates are direct coincidence measurements with separately stated correction factors. The paper does not rely on self-citation for any load-bearing claim; the cited prior work supplies material data and general QPM background, and the authors of the present paper do not appear as the authors of the decisive cited results. The main vulnerability, namely the assumption that kwg is the same for type-0 and type-II even though the idler polarizations differ, is a physical-modeling assumption that may be incorrect and would affect the inferred orders, but it is not circular: the derivation does not reduce to its own inputs by construction. Accordingly, no circular step is identified and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the measured spectra and rates, plus the phase-matching analysis. The main free parameter is kwg, and the key assumptions are the applicability of undoped KTP dispersion to the Rb-doped waveguide and the polarization-independent kwg. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

kwg (waveguide phase mismatch) = -0.056 µm^-1
Chosen to balance the phase-matching equations after selecting mx=3 and my=1. Not independently measured; assumed equal for both SPDC types.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The Sellmeier equations and temperature coefficients for undoped KTP (Refs. [22,23]) are valid for the Rb-doped, ion-exchanged waveguide material.
Used in Eqs. (3)-(7) to compute refractive indices for phase-matching; ion exchange and Rb doping may alter indices.
ad hoc to paper The waveguide phase mismatch kwg is identical for type-0 and type-II SPDC at the wavelength intersection.
Stated in Section 3.3 before Eqs. (9)-(10); the idler polarization differs, so this is not self-evident.
standard math Only odd grating orders contribute to quasi-phase matching.
Cited Refs. [24,25]; used as a constraint to select mx=3, my=1.
domain assumption The secondary type-0 degenerate peak at 56°C is caused by a higher-order pump mode.
Attributed in Section 3.1 to a higher-order pump mode based on Ref. [15]; no modal measurement supports this.
ad hoc to paper The total photon-pair rate is contained within a 20 nm bandwidth for the spectral density conversion.
Used in Section 3.2 to convert 262.88 MHz/mW to 13.14 MHz/mW/nm; no filter measurement is reported.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rubidium-Doped KTiOPO$_4$ Waveguides as a Dual-Type Photon Pair Source." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QHTJDMIG

@misc{pith2026250514269,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rubidium-Doped KTiOPO$_4$ Waveguides as a Dual-Type Photon Pair Source},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QHTJDMIG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14269}
}

abstract

We investigate the dual generation of type-0 and type-II spontaneous parametric down conversions (SPDCs) within a single periodically poled rubidium-doped KTiOPO$_4$ (PPRKTP) waveguide. By coupling a 45 degree linearly polarized pump laser into the waveguide, both SPDC processes are concurrently excited: the type-0 SPDC process is facilitated via third-order quasi-phase matching (QPM) utilizing the nonlinear coefficient $d_{33}$ , while the type-II SPDC process employs first-order QPM with the nonlinear coefficient $d_{24}$. This dual-SPDC scheme holds potential for applications in quantum communication protocols targeting the telecommunication wavelength.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.14269 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Temperature-dependent spectral evolution of SPDC generated by waveguide [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** (a) Measured coincidence count rates for type-0 (blue dots) and type-II (red dots) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (a) SPDC spectral overlap for type-0 (blue dots) and type-II (red dots). Each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

[1]

PerspectivesforApplicationsofQuantumImaging,

M.GilaberteBasset, F.Setzpfandt, F.Steinlechner, etal., “PerspectivesforApplicationsofQuantumImaging,” Laser & Photonics Rev.13, 1900097 (2019)

work page 2019
[2]

Highly nondegenerate polarization-entangled photon pairs produced through noncritical phasematching in single-domain KTiOPO4,

J. B. Chin, D. Prato, and A. Ling, “Highly nondegenerate polarization-entangled photon pairs produced through noncritical phasematching in single-domain KTiOPO4,” arXiv:2502.18752 [quant-ph] (2025)

arXiv 2025
[3]

Spontaneous parametric down-conversion in periodically poled KTP waveguides and bulk crystals,

M. Fiorentino, S. M. Spillane, R. G. Beausoleil,et al., “Spontaneous parametric down-conversion in periodically poled KTP waveguides and bulk crystals,” Opt. Express15, 7479–7488 (2007)

work page 2007
[4]

Efficient heralding of polarization-entangled photons from type-0 and type-II spontaneous parametric downconversion in periodically poled KTiOPO4,

F. Steinlechner, M. Gilaberte, M. Jofre,et al., “Efficient heralding of polarization-entangled photons from type-0 and type-II spontaneous parametric downconversion in periodically poled KTiOPO4,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B31, 2068–2076 (2014)

work page 2014
[5]

High-performance source of spectrally pure, polarization entangled photon pairs based on hybrid integrated-bulk optics,

E. Meyer-Scott, N. Prasannan, C. Eigner,et al., “High-performance source of spectrally pure, polarization entangled photon pairs based on hybrid integrated-bulk optics,” Opt. Express26, 32475–32490 (2018)

work page 2018
[6]

Simultaneous phase matching and internal interference of two second-order nonlinear parametric processes,

B. F. Johnston, P. Dekker, M. J. Withford,et al., “Simultaneous phase matching and internal interference of two second-order nonlinear parametric processes,” Opt. Express14, 11756–11765 (2006)

work page 2006
[7]

Simultaneous type-I and type-II phase matching for second-order nonlinearity in integrated lithium niobate waveguide,

I. Briggs, S. Hou, C. Cui, and L. Fan, “Simultaneous type-I and type-II phase matching for second-order nonlinearity in integrated lithium niobate waveguide,” Opt. Express29, 26183–26190 (2021)

work page 2021
[8]

Quasi-phase-matched concurrent nonlinearities in periodically poled for quantum computing over the optical frequency comb ,

M. Pysher, A. Bahabad, P. Peng,et al., “Quasi-phase-matched concurrent nonlinearities in periodically poled for quantum computing over the optical frequency comb ,” Opt. Lett.35, 565–567 (2010)

work page 2010

Show all 27 references

[9]

Simultaneous type-0 and type-II spontaneous parametric down- conversions in a single periodically poled KTiOPO4 crystal,

H. J. Lee, H. Kim, M. Cha, and H. S. Moon, “Simultaneous type-0 and type-II spontaneous parametric down- conversions in a single periodically poled KTiOPO4 crystal,” Appl. Phys. B108, 585–589 (2012)

2012
[10]

A versatile waveguide source of photon pairs for chip-scale quantum information processing,

J. Chen, A. J. Pearlman, A. Ling,et al., “A versatile waveguide source of photon pairs for chip-scale quantum information processing,” Opt. Express17, 6727–6740 (2009)

2009
[11]

Ion-exchanged waveguides in periodically poled Rb-doped KTiOPO4 for efficient second harmonic generation,

P. Mutter, C. C. Kores, M. Widarsson,et al., “Ion-exchanged waveguides in periodically poled Rb-doped KTiOPO4 for efficient second harmonic generation,” Opt. Express28, 38822–38830 (2020)

2020
[12]

Domaindynamicsincoercive-fieldengineeredsub- 𝜇mperiodicallypoled Rb-doped KTiOPO4,

P.Mutter, A.Zukauskas, andC.Canalias, “Domaindynamicsincoercive-fieldengineeredsub- 𝜇mperiodicallypoled Rb-doped KTiOPO4,” Opt. Mater. Express12, 4332–4340 (2022)

2022
[13]

Cascaded counter-propagating nonlinear interactions in highly- efficient sub-µm periodically poled crystals,

A. Zukauskas, A.-L. Viotti, C. Liljestrand,et al., “Cascaded counter-propagating nonlinear interactions in highly- efficient sub-µm periodically poled crystals,” Sci. Reports7 (2017)

2017
[14]

Photon-pair production and frequency translation using backward-wave spontaneous parametric downconversion,

P. S. Kuo, D. V. Reddy, V. Verma,et al., “Photon-pair production and frequency translation using backward-wave spontaneous parametric downconversion,” Opt. Quantum1, 43–48 (2023)

2023
[15]

LiNbO3 waveguides for integrated SPDC spectroscopy,

A. S. Solntsev, P. Kumar, T. Pertsch,et al., “LiNbO3 waveguides for integrated SPDC spectroscopy,” APL Phot.3, 021301 (2018)

2018
[16]

Direct Measurement of the Spatial-Spectral Structure of Waveguided Parametric Down-Conversion,

P. J. Mosley, A. Christ, A. Eckstein, and C. Silberhorn, “Direct Measurement of the Spatial-Spectral Structure of Waveguided Parametric Down-Conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 233901 (2009)

2009
[17]

Efficientparametricfrequencyconversioninlithiumniobatenanophotonic chips,

J.yangChen,Y.M.Sua,Z.huiMa, etal.,“Efficientparametricfrequencyconversioninlithiumniobatenanophotonic chips,” OSA Continuum2, 2914–2924 (2019)

2019
[18]

High Quality Entangled Photon Pair Generation in Periodically Poled Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Waveguides,

J. Zhao, C. Ma, M. Rüsing, and S. Mookherjea, “High Quality Entangled Photon Pair Generation in Periodically Poled Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 163603 (2020)

2020
[19]

Ultrabright Entangled-Photon-Pair Generation from anAlGaAs-On- Insulator Microring Resonator,

T. J. Steiner, J. E. Castro, L. Chang,et al., “Ultrabright Entangled-Photon-Pair Generation from anAlGaAs-On- Insulator Microring Resonator,” PRX Quantum2, 010337 (2021)

2021
[20]

Scalable, fiber-compatible lithium-niobate-on-insulator micro-waveguides for efficient nonlinear photonics,

Y. Zhang, H. Li, T. Ding,et al., “Scalable, fiber-compatible lithium-niobate-on-insulator micro-waveguides for efficient nonlinear photonics,” Optica10, 688–693 (2023)

2023
[21]

OPTICAL AMPLIFIERS | Raman, Brillouin and Parametric Amplifiers,

M. Ferreira, “OPTICAL AMPLIFIERS | Raman, Brillouin and Parametric Amplifiers,” inEncyclopedia of Modern Optics,R. D. Guenther, ed. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2005), pp. 297–308

2005
[22]

Second harmonic generation and accurate index of refraction measurements in flux-grown KTiOPO4,

T. Y. Fan, C. E. Huang, B. Q. Hu,et al., “Second harmonic generation and accurate index of refraction measurements in flux-grown KTiOPO4,” Appl. Opt.26, 2390–2394 (1987)

1987
[23]

Temperature-dependent dispersion equations for KTiOPO4 and KTiOAsO4,

S. Emanueli and A. Arie, “Temperature-dependent dispersion equations for KTiOPO4 and KTiOAsO4,” Appl. Opt. 42, 6661–6665 (2003)

2003
[24]

Poling Quality Evaluation of Periodically Poled Lithium Niobate Using Diffraction Method,

K. Pandiyan, Y. S. Kang, H. H. Lim,et al., “Poling Quality Evaluation of Periodically Poled Lithium Niobate Using Diffraction Method,” J. Opt. Soc. Korea12, 205–209 (2008)

2008
[25]

Quasi-phase matched devices in Rb-doped KTiOPO4: counterpropagating nonlinear interactions, domain dynamics, and waveguides,

P. Mutter, “Quasi-phase matched devices in Rb-doped KTiOPO4: counterpropagating nonlinear interactions, domain dynamics, and waveguides,” Phd thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hannes Alvéns Väg 12, Stockholm (2022). Available at http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/di...

2022
[26]

A novel type of quasi-phasematching for the second harmonic generation,

E. G. Sokolovskaya, K. A. Fedorova, V. V. Dudelev,et al., “A novel type of quasi-phasematching for the second harmonic generation,” J. Physics: Conf. Ser.769, 012050 (2016)

2016
[27]

Magnitude of the nonlinear-optical coefficients of KTiOPO4,

H. Vanherzeele and J. D. Bierlein, “Magnitude of the nonlinear-optical coefficients of KTiOPO4,” Opt. Lett.17, 982–984 (1992)

1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

PerspectivesforApplicationsofQuantumImaging,

M.GilaberteBasset, F.Setzpfandt, F.Steinlechner, etal., “PerspectivesforApplicationsofQuantumImaging,” Laser & Photonics Rev.13, 1900097 (2019)

work page 2019

[2] [2]

Highly nondegenerate polarization-entangled photon pairs produced through noncritical phasematching in single-domain KTiOPO4,

J. B. Chin, D. Prato, and A. Ling, “Highly nondegenerate polarization-entangled photon pairs produced through noncritical phasematching in single-domain KTiOPO4,” arXiv:2502.18752 [quant-ph] (2025)

arXiv 2025

[3] [3]

Spontaneous parametric down-conversion in periodically poled KTP waveguides and bulk crystals,

M. Fiorentino, S. M. Spillane, R. G. Beausoleil,et al., “Spontaneous parametric down-conversion in periodically poled KTP waveguides and bulk crystals,” Opt. Express15, 7479–7488 (2007)

work page 2007

[4] [4]

Efficient heralding of polarization-entangled photons from type-0 and type-II spontaneous parametric downconversion in periodically poled KTiOPO4,

F. Steinlechner, M. Gilaberte, M. Jofre,et al., “Efficient heralding of polarization-entangled photons from type-0 and type-II spontaneous parametric downconversion in periodically poled KTiOPO4,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B31, 2068–2076 (2014)

work page 2014

[5] [5]

High-performance source of spectrally pure, polarization entangled photon pairs based on hybrid integrated-bulk optics,

E. Meyer-Scott, N. Prasannan, C. Eigner,et al., “High-performance source of spectrally pure, polarization entangled photon pairs based on hybrid integrated-bulk optics,” Opt. Express26, 32475–32490 (2018)

work page 2018

[6] [6]

Simultaneous phase matching and internal interference of two second-order nonlinear parametric processes,

B. F. Johnston, P. Dekker, M. J. Withford,et al., “Simultaneous phase matching and internal interference of two second-order nonlinear parametric processes,” Opt. Express14, 11756–11765 (2006)

work page 2006

[7] [7]

Simultaneous type-I and type-II phase matching for second-order nonlinearity in integrated lithium niobate waveguide,

I. Briggs, S. Hou, C. Cui, and L. Fan, “Simultaneous type-I and type-II phase matching for second-order nonlinearity in integrated lithium niobate waveguide,” Opt. Express29, 26183–26190 (2021)

work page 2021

[8] [8]

Quasi-phase-matched concurrent nonlinearities in periodically poled for quantum computing over the optical frequency comb ,

M. Pysher, A. Bahabad, P. Peng,et al., “Quasi-phase-matched concurrent nonlinearities in periodically poled for quantum computing over the optical frequency comb ,” Opt. Lett.35, 565–567 (2010)

work page 2010