Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 49 references

Full spectral response of grating-induced loss in photonic crystal microrings

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Grating-induced loss in photonic crystal microrings is governed by one ratio, N/m, which maps out a full spectrum of radiation and mode-coupling loss channels.

desk verdict Useful measured loss map for PhCRs at 1550 nm with plausible physics, but the broadband 'full spectral response' for a fixed device is an unverified extrapolation that needs a second-wavelength check. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14974 v1 pith:ZZMNS4NT submitted 2025-05-20 physics.optics

Daniel Pimbi , Yi Sun , Roy Zektzer , Xiyuan Lu , Kartik Srinivasan This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.79.Dj42.60.Da42.65.-k
keywords photoniccrystalmicroringgrating-inducedlossorbitalangularmomentumqualityfactornonlinearphotonicsradiationmodecouplingbroadbandspectralmapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that grating-induced loss in photonic crystal microrings is controlled by a single dimensionless ratio, $N/m = \lambda/\Lambda$, where $N$ is the number of grating periods, $m$ the azimuthal mode number, $\lambda$ the modal wavelength, and $\Lambda$ the grating period. By measuring 37 devices with different grating periods at a fixed wavelength, the authors map out the full loss spectrum and identify distinct loss channels: a broad vertical-emission region centered at $N/m = 1$, a sharp radiation peak near $N/m \approx 0.33$, a symmetric surface-radiation peak near $1.67$, and TE$_0$–TE$_1$ mode-coupling peaks near $0.13$ and $1.87$, with negligible excess loss for $N/m \geq 2$. The result matters because nonlinear PhCR devices operate across widely separated wavelengths, so a single device can land in a lossy region even when its design wavelength is safe. If correct, the spectrum gives a loss-aware design rule for avoiding degraded $Q$ and even for deliberately suppressing unwanted nonlinear processes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is $N/m = \lambda/\Lambda = \lambda_0/(n_{\mathrm{eff}}\Lambda)$, which equates the grating-to-mode-number ratio with the ratio of modal wavelength to grating period. Because the experimental study varies $N$ at fixed $m$ and wavelength, this identity lets the authors reparametrize single-wavelength, many-device data into a broadband spectrum for a single device of fixed $\Lambda$. The physical mechanisms are assigned using two supplementary tools: the OAM radiation angle $\theta_r$ from Snell's law with internal ejection angle $\theta_e = (l/m)(\pi/2)$, and the phase mismatch $\Delta\beta = \beta_1 - \beta_2 - 2\pi/\Lambda$ among TE$_0$, TE$_1$, OAM, and counterpropagating TE$_0$ modes. Together these identify which loss features are radiation into claddings and which are mode conversions.

What would settle it

Measure or simulate the same fixed-$\Lambda$ PhCR (for example $\Lambda = 730$ nm) at several different free-space wavelengths across the 400–2470 nm range and check whether the loss peaks appear at the $N/m$ positions predicted from the 1550 nm data; if the peaks shift, split, or change relative strength with wavelength, the claim that loss depends only on $N/m$ fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that grating-induced loss in a PhCR is a function of the ratio $N/m$ rather than of the grating period or wavelength separately. Experimentally, at $\lambda_0 \approx 1550$ nm with $m = 165$, varying $N$ from 0 to 600 produces a loss spectrum with a broad excess-loss band centered at $N/m = 1$ from vertical out-coupling into OAM-carrying states; a pronounced radiation peak at $N/m \approx 0.33$; a symmetric surface-radiation peak at $N/m \approx 1.67$; TE$_0$–TE$_1$ forward/backward coupling peaks at $N/m \approx 0.13$ and $1.87$; and essentially no excess loss for $N/m \geq 2$, including the Bragg backscattering condition at $N/m = 2$. 3D FDTD simulations reproduce the main features, and radiation-angle and phase-mismatch calculations assign each peak to a physical mechanism. The paper then transforms this $N/m$ spectrum into a wavelength-dependent loss spectrum for a fixed grating period $\Lambda = 730$ nm, showing which wavelengths of a broadband nonlinear process will suffer degraded $Q$.

Load-bearing premise

The broadband spectrum for a fixed device is obtained by reparametrizing loss measured at a single wavelength (1550 nm) across many devices with different grating periods, assuming the loss depends only on the ratio $N/m$ and that wavelength enters only through the effective index $n_{\mathrm{eff}}$; if grating-induced loss changes with absolute wavelength through dispersion, cladding contrast, or mode-field redistribution, the predicted spectrum would be inaccurate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A fixed-Λ PhCR spanning a wide bandwidth will have degraded Q at wavelengths corresponding to N/m ≈ 0.33 and across the broad OAM loss region up to N/m ≈ 1.7, raising thresholds and lowering conversion efficiency in OPO and four-wave mixing Bragg scattering.
  • The Bragg mode-splitting condition at N/m = 2 carries negligible excess loss, so it remains a safe choice for phase matching long-wavelength modes.
  • Loss-aware design can avoid the loss channels by applying mode splitting to the shortest-wavelength mode instead, since no excess loss is seen for N/m > 2.
  • The broad excess-loss region can be used deliberately to suppress competing nonlinear processes by aligning unwanted wavelengths with it.
  • The positions of loss peaks in N/m are stable as the grating modulation amplitude increases; only the overall loss magnitude grows, and small TE0–TM0 coupling peaks appear at higher amplitudes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the N/m scaling is universal, the same loss spectrum should reappear in other PhCR geometries and material systems once rescaled by their effective index, so the peak positions could serve as a design-rule table across platforms, a transfer the paper does not itself demonstrate.
  • The mapping from fixed-wavelength multi-device data to a broadband spectrum assumes loss depends only on N/m, with dispersion entering only through the effective index; measuring a single fixed-Λ device at several wavelengths would test this assumption directly.
  • The near-symmetric placement of peaks around N/m = 1 (0.13/1.87, 0.33/1.67) hints at a reciprocal phase-matching picture in which forward and backward couplings mirror each other, so a coupled-mode theory could likely predict the whole spectrum from one side.
  • In high-power comb generation, the broad OAM loss region could act as a built-in limiter on parasitic modes, potentially improving soliton stability by damping unwanted resonances, a consequence the paper suggests but does not quantify.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental and numerical study of grating-induced loss in photonic crystal microrings (PhCRs). The authors measure 37 devices with a fixed microring circumference and azimuthal mode number (m=165) at a fixed free-space wavelength (λ0≈1550 nm), varying the grating period Λ (or number of periods N) from 0 to about 600. From transmission fits they extract the loaded Q and total loss κ, and plot κ versus N/m, where N/m = λ/Λ = λ0/(neffΛ). They identify distinct loss channels: a broad excess-loss region centered at N/m≈1 attributed to vertical out-coupling into OAM states, a pronounced radiation peak at N/m≈0.33, a symmetric peak near N/m≈1.67, TE0–TE1 coupling peaks near N/m≈0.13 and 1.87, and negligible excess loss for N/m≥2 including the Bragg condition at N/m=2. These observations are compared with 3D FDTD simulations and interpreted through OAM radiation-angle and phase-mismatch calculations. In the latter part of the paper, the authors transform the measured N/m-dependent loss into a wavelength-dependent loss spectrum for a single fixed-period device (Λ=730 nm) spanning roughly 400–2470 nm, and they discuss implications for OPO and four-wave-mixing Bragg scattering.

Significance. If the N/m-universality assumption underlying the wavelength mapping is correct, the paper provides a useful design rule for PhCR-based nonlinear photonics, showing where grating-induced loss degrades Q for far-detuned pump, signal, and idler wavelengths. The strength of the work is the systematic 37-device experimental dataset at 1550 nm and the generally good qualitative agreement between experiment and FDTD for the positions of the main loss channels. The phase-mismatch and radiation-angle analysis is physically transparent and helps assign mechanisms to the observed peaks. However, the central 'full spectral response' claim for a fixed device is not independently validated: it is obtained by a change of variables from single-wavelength data, and the paper does not present experimental or FDTD results at any second wavelength. The appendix itself shows that loss amplitudes redistribute when the cladding environment changes, indicating that N/m alone does not fix the loss spectrum.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 3(a)–(b) and accompanying text] The fixed-Λ spectrum over 400–2470 nm is generated by reparametrizing the 1550 nm loss-versus-N/m curve via N/m = λ0/(neff(λ0)Λ). This assumes that grating-induced loss is a universal function of N/m only, with absolute wavelength entering only through the TE0 effective index. No experimental or FDTD data at any other wavelength is presented to test this assumption. The effective indices of the TE1, TM0, and OAM modes that determine the phase-matching conditions and radiation angles in Fig. 2(d) are dispersive, so the positions and amplitudes of the identified loss channels (e.g., the N/m≈0.33 peak and the broad OAM band) could shift or change strength at shorter or longer wavelengths. I recommend either validating the mapping with a second-wavelength measurement or FDTD simulation at one or two probe wavelengths for a fixed Λ, or explicitly presenting Fig. 3(b) as a model extrapolation rather than an experimentally established 'full spectral response.'
  2. [Appendix, Figs. 6–7] The appendix shows that changing the cladding environment from asymmetric (air/SiO2) to symmetric (SiO2/SiO2) substantially redistributes loss between channels (ii)/(v) and (iii)/(vi), and changes the total loss by 56–97% depending on grating configuration. This demonstrates that loss amplitudes are not determined by N/m alone but also depend on the refractive-index environment and modal field overlap, both of which vary with absolute wavelength. Consequently, the universal curve used to generate Fig. 3(b) carries an unquantified error. The manuscript should state this limitation explicitly and, if possible, estimate how much the loss-channel positions and strengths move over the 400–2470 nm range when the dispersions of neff for all relevant modes are included.
  3. [Section II, Fig. 2(d) and simulation text] The 3D FDTD results are computed with a grating modulation amplitude of A=20 nm and then 'rescaled' to the experimental A=6 nm, but the rescaling law is not specified or justified. Because the simulated loss magnitudes are compared directly with the measured κ values, this rescaling factor acts as a free parameter that can absorb discrepancies in amplitude. The authors should state whether the rescaling is a fixed power-law scaling, a best fit to the experimental data, or derived from a separate set of simulations, and they should report the resulting uncertainty in the loss magnitudes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption for panel (d) says the experimental loss values are 'extracted from the transmission spectra in (a)', but panel (a) contains SEM images; the transmission spectra appear in panel (c).
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption states 'λ = 2π(RR−RW)/m = λ0/(neffΛ)', which is dimensionally incorrect: λ = λ0/neff, while N/m = λ/Λ = λ0/(neffΛ). This should be corrected to avoid confusing the variable transformation.
  3. [Abstract and Conclusion] The abstract and conclusion state that the paper establishes the 'full spectral response' of grating-induced loss. Given that the experimental evidence is obtained at a single free-space wavelength, the broadband part of the claim should be qualified as a predicted or extrapolated response unless additional validation is added.
  4. [Section II, regions ii and vi] The TE0–TE1 coupling peaks are predicted by FDTD and phase-mismatch analysis but are not observed in the experimental transmission measurements. The text should state more prominently that these channels are numerical predictions rather than directly measured features.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; the Fig. 3(b) broadband map is a transparent reparametrization of the measured κ(N/m) data, not an independent validation.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The loss-versus-N/m spectrum in Fig. 2(d) is original experimental data measured at λ0 ≈ 1550 nm across 37 devices with varying grating period, and the 3D FDTD simulations independently reproduce the main loss peaks at the same fixed wavelength. The phase-mismatch and OAM radiation-angle analyses use effective indices obtained from 2D eigenmode simulations rather than parameters fitted to the loss data, so the peak identifications are not fit-to-claim. The only mildly concerning step is the transformation in Fig. 3(a)-(b), where the fixed-Λ 'full spectral response' κ(λ0) is obtained by mapping the measured κ(N/m) through the identity N/m = λ/Λ = λ0/(neffΛ). This is an explicit change of variables, not a new calculation or measurement at other wavelengths, and the paper labels it as a mathematical mapping. The y-axis loss values are therefore the same measured values, and the wavelength axis is rescaled using a separately computed neff(λ0). This is not circular in the logical sense, but it does rest on an untested scale-invariance assumption that the loss depends only on the ratio λ/Λ, which is a validation burden rather than a circularity. Self-citations, such as [29] for the OAM ejection-angle formula, are present but not load-bearing because the paper's own FDTD field profiles and loss data independently support the OAM interpretation. Overall, no step reduces the claimed result to its own input by construction, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experiments themselves are free of fitted parameters, but the simulated total loss relies on an undocumented amplitude rescaling, and the full-spectrum claim rests on a scale-invariance premise that is not independently tested.

free parameters (1)
  • FDTD A=20 nm to A=6 nm loss rescaling factor = Implicit
    3D FDTD uses A=20 nm due to the 20 nm mesh; losses are rescaled to experimental A=6 nm with no stated scaling law, effectively adjusting simulation magnitude to match experiment.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Grating-induced loss depends only on N/m = lambda/Lambda and not on absolute wavelength for the mapping in Fig. 3.
    Measurements and simulations are at 1550 nm only; the wavelength sweep for fixed Lambda is a variable transformation, not an independent calculation or measurement.
  • domain assumption Loss in a half-ring FDTD simulation equals half the loss of the full ring, so doubling is valid.
    Section II states the intrinsic loss is multiplied by two to account for the full PhCR device; no symmetry or convergence check is shown.
  • domain assumption Loss scales from A=20 nm to A=6 nm without changing the spectral shape.
    Fig. 4 shows peak positions are robust to A, but the quantitative magnitude scaling between A=20 nm and A=6 nm is not derived or separately validated.
  • domain assumption Bus-ring coupling loss is accurately captured by a separate grating-free FDTD simulation and is additive to intrinsic loss.
    The total simulated loss adds a coupling loss from a grating-free microring simulation; no experimental baseline for the coupling contribution is shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Full spectral response of grating-induced loss in photonic crystal microrings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZZMNS4NT

@misc{pith2026250514974,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Full spectral response of grating-induced loss in photonic crystal microrings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZZMNS4NT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14974}
}
read the original abstract

Photonic crystal microrings (PhCRs) have emerged as powerful and versatile platforms for integrated nonlinear photonics, offering precise control over frequency and phase matching while maintaining high optical quality factors. Through grating-mediated mode coupling, PhCRs enable advanced dispersion engineering, which is critical for wideband nonlinear processes such as optical parametric oscillation, Kerr frequency comb generation, and dual-pump spontaneous and Bragg scattering four-wave mixing. Beyond dispersion control, PhCRs also facilitate the manipulation of orbital angular momentum (OAM) emission, a key functionality for encoding high-dimensional quantum states in emerging quantum photonic platforms. Despite these advances, the broadband spectral behavior of grating-induced losses in PhCRs remains largely unexplored, with most studies focusing on grating periods near the modal wavelength or its half. Such losses can significantly impact broadband nonlinear processes, where excess loss at unintended wavelengths can degrade device performance. In this work, we experimentally characterize grating-induced losses in PhCRs and reveal their full spectral response as a function of the ratio between modal wavelength and grating period. We identify distinct loss channels arising from either radiation or mode conversion, including a broad excess-loss region attributed to vertical out-coupling into OAM-carrying states. These observations are supported by three-dimensional finite-difference time-domain simulations and further analyzed through OAM radiation angle and phase-mismatch analysis. The resulting broadband loss spectrum highlights critical design trade-offs and provides practical guidelines for optimizing PhCR-based devices for nonlinear photonic applications involving widely separated frequencies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.14974 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Applications of photonic crystal microring resonators (PhCRs) and an approach for characterizing their broadband [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Experimental characterization of grating-induced loss in PhCRs, supported by 3D FDTD simulations. (a) Scanning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. A mathematical approach (a) for mapping the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Simulated grating-induced loss spectra as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schematic illustrations of PhCRs with inner and outer sidewall sinusoidal gratings. (a) Cross-sectional view of a PhCR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Numerical simulation of grating-induced loss in PhCRs with outer and inner sidewall gratings under asymmetric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Numerical simulation of grating-induced loss in PhCRs with outer and inner sidewall gratings under symmetric cladding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Slow-light dispersion in periodically patterned silicon microring resonators,

    J. Y. Lee and P. M. Fauchet, “Slow-light dispersion in periodically patterned silicon microring resonators,” Opt. Lett.37(1), 58–60 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Resonance-splitting and enhanced notch depth in SOI ring resonators with mutual mode coupling,

    Z. Zhang, M. Dainese, L. Wosinski, and M. Qiu, “Resonance-splitting and enhanced notch depth in SOI ring resonators with mutual mode coupling,” Opt. Express16(7), 4621–4630 (2008). URLhttps://opg. optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-16-7-4621

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Selective engineering of cavity resonance for frequency matching in optical parametric processes,

    X. Lu, S. Rogers, W. C. Jiang, and Q. Lin, “Selective engineering of cavity resonance for frequency matching in optical parametric processes,” Applied Physics Letters 105(15) (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Rod and slit photonic crystal microrings for on-chip cav- ity quantum electrodynamics,

    X. Lu, F. Zhou, Y. Sun, A. Chanana, M. Wang, A. Mc- Clung, V. A. Aksyuk, M. Davanco, and K. Srinivasan, “Rod and slit photonic crystal microrings for on-chip cav- ity quantum electrodynamics,” Nanophotonics12, 521– 529 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Using Backscattering and Backcoupling in Silicon Ring Resonators as a New De- gree of Design Freedom,

    A. Li and W. Bogaerts, “Using Backscattering and Backcoupling in Silicon Ring Resonators as a New De- gree of Design Freedom,” Laser & Photonics Reviews 13(2019). URLhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:165055443

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Side-mode suppressed filter based on anangular grating-subwavelength grating microring res- onator with high flexibility in wavelength design,

    N. Wu and L. Xia, “Side-mode suppressed filter based on anangular grating-subwavelength grating microring res- onator with high flexibility in wavelength design,” Ap- plied Optics58(26), 7174–7180 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Performance of SOI Bragg grating ring resonator for nonlinear sensing applications,

    F. De Leonardis, C. E. Campanella, B. Troia, A. G. Perri, and V. M. Passaro, “Performance of SOI Bragg grating ring resonator for nonlinear sensing applications,” Sen- sors14(9), 16,017–16,034 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Photonic crystal microring resonator for label-free biosensing,

    S. M. Lo, S. Hu, G. Gaur, Y. Kostoulas, S. M. Weiss, and P. M. Fauchet, “Photonic crystal microring resonator for label-free biosensing,” Optics express25(6), 7046–7054 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Integrated label-free optical biochemical sen- sor with a large measurement range based on an angu- lar grating-microring resonator,

    T. Ma, L. Sun, J. Yuan, X. Sang, B. Yan, K. Wang, and C. Yu, “Integrated label-free optical biochemical sen- sor with a large measurement range based on an angu- lar grating-microring resonator,” Applied Optics55(18), 4784–4790 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Realization of a narrowband single wave- length microring mirror,

    A. Arbabi, Y. M. Kang, C.-Y. Lu, E. Chow, and L. L. Goddard, “Realization of a narrowband single wave- length microring mirror,” Applied Physics Letters99(9), 091,105 (2011). https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3633111/13813748/091105 1 online.pdf, URLhttps...

    2011 doi

  3. [11]

    Grating integrated single mode micror- ing laser,

    A. Arbabi, S. M. Kamali, E. Arbabi, B. G. Griffin, and L. L. Goddard, “Grating integrated single mode micror- ing laser,” Optics Express23(4), 5335–5347 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Optical-parametric oscillation in photonic-crystal ring resonators,

    J. A. Black, G. Brodnik, H. Liu, S.-P. Yu, D. R. Carlson, J. Zang, T. C. Briles, and S. B. Papp, “Optical-parametric oscillation in photonic-crystal ring resonators,” Optica9(10), 1183–1189 (2022). URLhttps://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm? URI=optica-9-10-1183

    2022

  5. [13]

    Kerr optical parametric oscillation in a photonic crystal microring for accessing the infrared,

    X. Lu, A. Chanana, F. Zhou, M. Davanco, and K. Srini- vasan, “Kerr optical parametric oscillation in a photonic crystal microring for accessing the infrared,” Opt. Lett. 47(13), 3331–3334 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Wavelength-accurate nonlinear con- version through wavenumber selectivity in photonic crys- tal resonators,

    J. R. Stone, X. Lu, G. Moille, D. Westly, T. Rahman, and K. Srinivasan, “Wavelength-accurate nonlinear con- version through wavenumber selectivity in photonic crys- tal resonators,” Nat. Photonics18, 192–199 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Broadband and ac- curate electric tuning of on-chip efficient nonlinear para- metric conversion,

    J. Li, Y. Zhang, J. Zeng, and S. Yu, “Broadband and ac- curate electric tuning of on-chip efficient nonlinear para- metric conversion,” Optica12(3), 424–432 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Tailoring microcombs with inverse-designed, meta-dispersion microresonators,

    E. Lucas, S.-P. Yu, T. C. Briles, D. R. Carlson, and S. B. Papp, “Tailoring microcombs with inverse-designed, meta-dispersion microresonators,” Nat. Photon.17, 943– 950 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Im- plementing photonic-crystal resonator frequency combs in a photonic foundry,

    H. Liu, I. Dickson, A. Antohe, L. G. Carpenter, J. Zang, A. R. Carollo, A. Dan, J. A. Black, and S. B. Papp, “Im- plementing photonic-crystal resonator frequency combs in a photonic foundry,” Opt. Lett.50(8), 2570–2573 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Integrated vortex soliton microcombs,

    Y. Liu, C. Lao, M. Wang, Y. Cheng, Y. Wang, S. Fu, C. Gao, J. Wang, B.-B. Li, Q. Gong,et al., “Integrated vortex soliton microcombs,” Nature Photonics18(6), 632–637 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Integrated optical vortex microcomb,

    B. Chen, Y. Zhou, Y. Liu, C. Ye, Q. Cao, P. Huang, C. Kim, Y. Zheng, L. K. Oxenløwe, K. Yvind,et al., “Integrated optical vortex microcomb,” Nature Photon- ics18(6), 625–631 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Spontaneous pulse formation in edgeless photonic crystal resonators,

    S.-P. Yu, D. C. Cole, H. Jung, G. T. Moille, K. Srini- vasan, and S. B. Papp, “Spontaneous pulse formation in edgeless photonic crystal resonators,” Nat. Photonics 15(6), 461–467 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    A contin- uum of bright and dark-pulse states in a photonic-crystal resonator,

    S.-P. Yu, E. Lucas, J. Zang, and S. B. Papp, “A contin- uum of bright and dark-pulse states in a photonic-crystal resonator,” Nature Communications13(1), 3134 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Synthetic reflection self-injection- locked microcombs,

    A. E. Ulanov, T. Wildi, N. G. Pavlov, J. D. Jost, M. Kar- pov, and T. Herr, “Synthetic reflection self-injection- locked microcombs,” Nature Photonics18(3), 294–299 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Band flipping and bandgap closing in a photonic crystal ring and its applications,

    X. Lu, A. Chanana, Y. Sun, A. McClung, M. Davanco, and K. Srinivasan, “Band flipping and bandgap closing in a photonic crystal ring and its applications,” Optics Express32(11), 20,360–20,369 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Quadrature squeezing in a nanophotonic microres- onator,

    A. E. Ulanov, B. Ruhnke, T. Wildi, and T. Herr, “Quadrature squeezing in a nanophotonic microres- onator,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17337 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Taming Brillouin Optomechanics Using Supermode Mi- croresonators,

    M. Wang, Z.-G. Hu, C. Lao, Y. Wang, X. Jin, X. Zhou, Y. Lei, Z. Wang, W. Liu, Q.-F. Yang, and B.-B. Li, “Taming Brillouin Optomechanics Using Supermode Mi- croresonators,” Phys. Rev. X14, 011,056 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Integrated Compact Optical Vortex Beam Emitters,

    X. Cai, J. Wang, M. J. Strain, B. Johnson-Morris, J. Zhu, M. Sorel, J. L. O’Brien, M. G. Thompson, and S. Yu, “Integrated Compact Optical Vortex Beam Emitters,” Science338(6105), 363–366 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    Orbital angular momentum of light for communica- tions,

    A. E. Willner, K. Pang, H. Song, K. Zou, and H. Zhou, “Orbital angular momentum of light for communica- tions,” Applied Physics Reviews8(4) (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Fractional Optical Angular Momentum and Multi-Defect-Mediated Mode Renormalization and Orientation Control in Photonic Crystal Microring Resonators,

    M. Wang, F. Zhou, X. Lu, A. McClung, M. Davanco, V. A. Aksyuk, and K. Srinivasan, “Fractional Optical Angular Momentum and Multi-Defect-Mediated Mode Renormalization and Orientation Control in Photonic Crystal Microring Resonators,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 186,101 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Highly- twisted states of light from a high quality factor photonic crystal ring,

    X. Lu, M. Wang, F. Zhou, M. Heuck, W. Zhu, V. A. Aksyuk, D. R. Englund, and K. Srinivasan, “Highly- twisted states of light from a high quality factor photonic crystal ring,” Nat. Commun.14(1), 1119 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Universal frequency engineering tool for micro- cavity nonlinear optics: multiple selective mode splitting of whispering-gallery resonances,

    X. Lu, A. Rao, G. Moille, D. A. Westly, and K. Srini- 12 vasan, “Universal frequency engineering tool for micro- cavity nonlinear optics: multiple selective mode splitting of whispering-gallery resonances,” Photon. Res.8(11), 1676–1686 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    High-Q slow light and its localization in a photonic crystal microring,

    X. Lu, A. McClung, and K. Srinivasan, “High-Q slow light and its localization in a photonic crystal microring,” Nat. Photonics16, 66–71 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Multi-mode microcavity frequency engineering through a shifted grating in a photonic crys- tal ring,

    X. Lu, Y. Sun, A. Chanana, U. A. Javid, M. Davanco, and K. Srinivasan, “Multi-mode microcavity frequency engineering through a shifted grating in a photonic crys- tal ring,” Photon. Res.11(11), A72 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Fourier synthesis dispersion engineering of pho- tonic crystal microrings for broadband frequency combs,

    G. Moille, X. Lu, J. Stone, D. Westly, and K. Srini- vasan, “Fourier synthesis dispersion engineering of pho- tonic crystal microrings for broadband frequency combs,” Commun. Phys.6(1), 144 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Broadband mid-infrared frequency comb generation in a Si3N4 microresonator,

    K. Luke, Y. Okawachi, M. R. Lamont, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, “Broadband mid-infrared frequency comb generation in a Si3N4 microresonator,” Opt. Lett. 40(21), 4823–4826 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Cavity-enhanced on-chip absorption spectroscopy using microring res- onators,

    A. Nitkowski, L. Chen, and M. Lipson, “Cavity-enhanced on-chip absorption spectroscopy using microring res- onators,” Optics express16(16), 11,930–11,936 (2008)

    2008

  28. [36]

    Design optimization for manufacturing polymer microring lasers: Focus on sur- face scattering losses,

    P. Sorayaie, L. Hajshahvaladi, M. Kolahdouz, K. Gol- shan, and G.-M. Parsanasab, “Design optimization for manufacturing polymer microring lasers: Focus on sur- face scattering losses,” Optics & Laser Technology182, 112,101 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Influence of surface roughness on microring-based phase shifters,

    H. Lee, T. Kananen, A. Soman, and T. Gu, “Influence of surface roughness on microring-based phase shifters,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters31(11), 813–816 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Broadband resonator-waveguide coupling for ef- ficient extraction of octave-spanning microcombs,

    G. Moille, Q. Li, T. C. Briles, S.-P. Yu, T. Drake, X. Lu, A. Rao, D. Westly, S. B. Papp, and K. Srini- vasan, “Broadband resonator-waveguide coupling for ef- ficient extraction of octave-spanning microcombs,” Opt. Lett.44(19), 4737–4740 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Distinguishing under-and over-coupled reso- nances without prior knowledge,

    C. Cui, L. Zhang, B.-H. Wu, S. Liu, P.-K. Chen, and L. Fan, “Distinguishing under-and over-coupled reso- nances without prior knowledge,” Optica11(2), 176–177 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Methods to achieve ultra-high quality fac- tor silicon nitride resonators,

    X. Ji, S. Roberts, M. Corato-Zanarella, and M. Lip- son, “Methods to achieve ultra-high quality fac- tor silicon nitride resonators,” APL Photonics6(7), 071,101 (2021). URLhttps://aip.scitation.org/doi/ 10.1063/5.0057881

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    Yariv and P

    A. Yariv and P. Yeh,Photonics: Optical Electronics in Modern Communications(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    2007

  34. [42]

    Sub- wavelength grating for enhanced ring resonator biosen- sor,

    J. Flueckiger, S. Schmidt, V. Donzella, A. Sherwali, D. M. Ratner, L. Chrostowski, and K. C. Cheung, “Sub- wavelength grating for enhanced ring resonator biosen- sor,” Optics express24(14), 15,672–15,686 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Compact, spatial-mode- interaction-free, ultralow-loss, nonlinear photonic in- tegrated circuits,

    X. Ji, J. Liu, J. He, R. N. Wang, Z. Qiu, J. Riemens- berger, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Compact, spatial-mode- interaction-free, ultralow-loss, nonlinear photonic in- tegrated circuits,” Communications Physics5(1), 84 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Design space exploration of microring resonators in silicon photonic interconnects: impact of the ring curvature,

    M. Bahadori, M. Nikdast, S. Rumley, L. Y. Dai, N. Janosik, T. Van Vaerenbergh, A. Gazman, Q. Cheng, R. Polster, and K. Bergman, “Design space exploration of microring resonators in silicon photonic interconnects: impact of the ring curvature,” Journal of lightwave tech- nology...

    2018

  37. [45]

    Diffraction- less propagation beyond the sub-wavelength regime: a new type of nanophotonic waveguide,

    C. Alonso-Ramos, X. Le Roux, J. Zhang, D. Benedikovic, V. Vakarin, E. Dur´ an-Valdeiglesias, D. Oser, D. P´ erez- Galacho, F. Mazeas, L. Labont´ e,et al., “Diffraction- less propagation beyond the sub-wavelength regime: a new type of nanophotonic waveguide,” Scientific Reports...

    2019

  38. [46]

    Milliwatt-threshold visible–telecom optical parametric oscillation using silicon nanophotonics,

    X. Lu, G. Moille, A. Singh, Q. Li, D. A. Westly, A. Rao, S.-P. Yu, T. C. Briles, S. B. Papp, and K. Srinivasan, “Milliwatt-threshold visible–telecom optical parametric oscillation using silicon nanophotonics,” Optica6(12), 1535–1541 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Efficient and low- noise single-photon-level frequency conversion interfaces using silicon nanophotonics,

    Q. Li, M. Davan¸ co, and K. Srinivasan, “Efficient and low- noise single-photon-level frequency conversion interfaces using silicon nanophotonics,” Nature Photonics10(6), 406–414 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Hyperpara- metric oscillation via bound states in the continuum,

    F. Lei, Z. Ye, K. Twayana, Y. Gao, M. Girardi, ´O. B. Helgason, P. Zhao, and V. Torres-Company, “Hyperpara- metric oscillation via bound states in the continuum,” Physical Review Letters130(9), 093,801 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Energy dissipation engineering for widely tunable (1.2–2.1µm) optical para- metric oscillation in integrated chalcogenide microres- onators,

    D. Xia, J. Zhao, H. Cheng, Z. Wang, J. Huang, L. Luo, D. Liu, S. Yang, B. Zhang, and Z. Li, “Energy dissipation engineering for widely tunable (1.2–2.1µm) optical para- metric oscillation in integrated chalcogenide microres- onators,” Laser & Photonics Reviews18(10), 2301,098 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.