Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 81 references

Subgap pumping of antiferromagnetic Mott insulators: photoexcitation mechanisms and applications

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Subgap laser pumping of a Mott insulator yields four photoexcitation regimes, with the Mott gap feeding back on its own carrier generation in real time.

desk verdict A careful variational treatment of subgap pumping in Mott insulators that plausibly recovers the known Keldysh limits and adds two new regimes, but the central cooperative-regime claim rests on an explicitly incomplete analytic derivation and an unbenchmarked mean-field ansatz. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15343 v1 pith:76NLYZSG submitted 2025-05-21 cond-mat.str-el

Radu Andrei , Mingyao Guo , Mustafa Ali , Hoon Kim , Richard D. Averitt , David Hsieh , Eugene Demler This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords MottinsulatorHubbardmodelKeldyshcrossovermultiphotonexcitationLandau-Zenertunnelinggaprenormalizationtime-dependentvariationalmethoddoublon-holepairs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that strong subgap pumping of an antiferromagnetic Mott insulator is governed by four photoexcitation mechanisms, not just the familiar two. A time-dependent variational treatment of the half-filled 2D Hubbard model recovers the conventional multiphoton and Landau-Zener tunneling rates on either side of the Keldysh crossover, and adds a broad cooperative region where the generation rate has tunneling field dependence yet shows multiphoton frequency thresholds, plus a low-field regime of incoherent linear absorption controlled by the dephasing rate. The central new element is real-time feedback: the photocarriers themselves suppress the Mott gap, which in turn slows or accelerates further carrier production, producing saturation on resonance and effective threshold lowering below resonance. If correct, the framework unifies single-shot rate calculations with steady-state descriptions, and identifies the momentum distribution of excited quasiparticles and coherent acoustic phonons as experimentally accessible fingerprints of the active mechanism.

What carries the argument

The central object is a time-dependent Gaussian variational density matrix for the antiferromagnetic (spin-density-wave) state of the Hubbard model, factorized over momentum sectors in the reduced Brillouin zone and restricted to doublon-hole pairs at zero total momentum. Its evolution is governed by a time-dependent Bogoliubov angle $\varphi_k(t) = \arctan[2\epsilon_k(t)/(US(t))]$, a quasiparticle dispersion $E_k(t) = \sqrt{\epsilon_k^2(t) + (US(t)/2)^2}$, and the self-consistency condition on the N\'eel order parameter $S(t)$, so the gap $\Delta(t) = US(t)$ responds to the carriers it helps create. The analytic engine is a generalized resonance condition that matches the poles of a two-frequency propagator $H(\Omega,\omega)$ at the doublon-hole energy $2E_k$ against peaks of the spectral weight of $\partial_t\varphi_k$; this yields the multiphoton power law $(eE_0a/\hbar\omega_d)^{2\Delta/\omega_d}$, the tunneling exponential $\exp(-\gamma\Delta/eE_0a)$, and, at finite $\Gamma$, the linear-absorption rate proportional to $\Gamma$.

What would settle it

Benchmark the same driven half-filled 2D Hubbard model ($U=1.93$ eV, $\tau=189$ meV, 100 fs Gaussian pump) against a method that does not assume the ansatz, such as dynamical mean-field theory, tensor networks, or time-dependent exact diagonalization on small clusters, and compare total photocarrier density, momentum distributions, and real-time saturation curves. If the exact calculation shows no persistent multiphoton thresholds above the Keldysh line, no saturation plateau while the pump is still on, or no sharp onset of absorption when the transiently renormalized gap crosses $n\omega_d$, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that a subgap-driven antiferromagnetic Mott insulator has not two but four photoexcitation regimes. Besides the standard multiphoton and Landau-Zener tunneling mechanisms separated by the Keldysh crossover, the authors find a broad cooperative region in which the carrier density follows the exponential tunneling dependence on field, $n \propto E^2 \exp(-\gamma\Delta/eEa)$, while simultaneously displaying sharp multiphoton thresholds whenever the gap is an integer multiple of the pump frequency, $\Delta/\omega_d \in \mathbb{Z}$; below a multiphoton-onset line, an incoherent linear-absorption pathway set by the dephasing rate $\Gamma$ dominates. Because the time-dependent variational treatment computes the N\'eel order parameter, and therefore the Mott gap $\Delta(t) = US(t)$, self-consistently during the pulse, gap suppression feeds back into the generation rate: on resonance the pump is driven out of resonance and carrier density saturates in real time, while below resonance transient micromotion can suppress the gap enough to bring the pump into resonance and effectively lower the multiphoton threshold. The momentum distribution of doublon-hole pairs (the charge excitations left when hopping transfers an electron across the Mott gap) immediately after the pump is proposed as a quantitative diagnostic of the active mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The entire picture rests on the variational ansatz: the driven state is assumed to be a product of independent momentum sectors containing only zero-total-momentum doublon-hole pairs, with a single Markovian dephasing rate and no carrier redistribution among momenta during the pump, so that all correlations beyond this simple structure are neglected on the pump timescale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single set of evolution equations reproduces both the rigid-band analytic regimes and the strong-drive phenomenology, so pump shape and pump duration become control parameters that interpolate between rate-like generation, saturation, and quasi-steady states.
  • Experiments inferring the excitation mechanism from field dependence alone will misread the cooperative region: carrier density scales as tunneling in the field while frequency thresholds at $\Delta/\omega_d \in \mathbb{Z}$ persist, meaning multiphoton and tunneling signatures coexist above the Keldysh line.
  • Near a multiphoton resonance at strong drive, pump-probe measurements should show carrier density saturating before the pulse peak, because the renormalized gap has already pushed the system off resonance.
  • Pumping just below $\Delta_0/n$ should show a drive-strength-dependent redshift of the absorption edge, with efficient excitation switching on once micromotion-driven gap suppression closes the detuning.
  • The momentum-space spread of photocarriers, and the amplitude of coherent acoustic phonons emitted at wavevector $\sim \lambda_{\rm pump}^{-1}$, both track the total carrier density and can serve as regime diagnostics in momentum-resolved and transient-reflectivity experiments.
  • Inference beyond the paper: the threshold-lowering mechanism implies that pulse shape is an active control knob, so a chirped pulse that walks the instantaneous frequency across the dropping gap could sustain resonance longer and raise the saturated carrier density above what a transform-limited pulse produces.
  • Inference beyond the paper: the single-Markovian-rate ansatz makes the saturation effect a prediction to be stress-tested by numerically exact methods that include doublon-doublon interactions and non-Markovian relaxation, which could sharpen or wash out the saturation plateau and shift the boundary of the incoherent regime.
  • Inference beyond the paper: the momentum-distribution diagnostic suggests a direct cold-atom test, in which quantum gas microscopy maps the distribution of doublon-hole pairs after a lattice-shaking pulse, exposing the predicted crossover from flat tunneling profiles to contour-localized multiphoton profiles to striped incoherent profiles without phononic or disorder complications.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies photoexcitation of the half-filled two-dimensional Hubbard model under subgap ac driving, using a time-dependent Gaussian variational ansatz built on the SDW mean-field state. It derives coupled evolution equations for the doublon-hole coherences and the self-consistent Néel order parameter, then analyzes the rigid-band limit to obtain approximate analytic rates: multiphoton excitation (Eq. 12), tunneling (Eq. 13), and a new incoherent linear-absorption pathway (Eq. 16). On this basis it claims a four-regime landscape in the frequency-field plane, including a cooperative region in which the field dependence is tunneling-like while frequency thresholds remain at integer Δ/ω_d, and a low-field incoherent region. The numerical solution of the full variational equations for cuprate-like parameters is used to study gap-renormalization feedback, saturation and threshold-lowering dynamics, momentum-resolved carrier distributions, and coherent acoustic phonon generation as a probe of photocarrier density.

Significance. If correct, the paper would provide a unified variational framework that recovers the known Keldysh multiphoton/tunneling limits while predicting additional experimentally accessible regimes and real-time gap-feedback effects. The analytic derivations are careful in the rigid-band sector, the incoherent formula (D49) is explicit, and the parameters are physical inputs rather than back-fitted free parameters; the recovery of the dc tunneling and multiphoton functional forms of Ref. [23] is a genuine strength. The momentum-distribution metric of Fig. 5 and the acoustic-phonon probe of Sec. V are potentially useful and testable. However, the paper's central new claim, the cooperative regime, rests on an incomplete analytic derivation of γ(ω_d) and on an unbenchmarked variational ansatz in exactly the strong-drive regime where the ansatz is least controlled; the significance is therefore conditional on resolving those issues.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II B and Appendix D3b, Eq. (13)] The cooperative regime, which is the paper's central new claim, is encoded in the frequency-dependent tunneling rate γ(ω_d) appearing in Eq. (13). However, Appendix D3b explicitly states that 'a more precise calculation of this enhancement needs to count all possible combinations of frequencies {n_i} satisfying the generalized resonance, rather than just the case n_1 ∼ n_2 ∼ ... ≡ n considered above'. No closed expression for γ(ω_d) is provided; the numerical fits in Fig. 3c extract the slope ex post, so the claimed coexistence of tunneling field dependence and multiphoton frequency thresholds is not an analytically established prediction. Please complete the calculation of γ(ω_d) from the generalized resonance condition (D36), or replace the claim with a direct numerical verification that is not based on fits to the asserted form.
  2. [Section II A, Eq. (5), and Appendix C] The variational density matrix factorizes over momentum sectors, keeps only zero-total-momentum doublon-hole pairs, collapses decoherence into a single Markovian rate Γ, and neglects intraband relaxation during the pump. No benchmark against numerically exact methods (DMFT, MPS, or exact diagonalization) is provided. The cooperative regime eEa ≫ ℏω_d is precisely where the vector potential sweeps the full Brillouin zone and the final carrier density becomes large, so inter-sector correlations, doublon-doublon scattering, and non-Markovian effects are expected to be strongest; the sharp thresholds in Fig. 2 and the saturation/threshold-lowering effects in Figs. 8 and 9 could therefore be artifacts of the ansatz. I ask for a concrete benchmark on a small cluster or 1D chain, or an explicit argument identifying a controlled limit in which the ansatz becomes exact, before the high-field predictions are presented as quantitative.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Footnote [58]] The footnote contains a duplicated phrase: 'At first, it may seem surprising that the regionsAt first, it may seem surprising that the regions in Fig. 2b...'.
  2. [Appendix D1, Eq. (D11)] There is a typo: 'intergral over δ' should be 'integral over δ'.
  3. [Figure 3 caption] The caption reads 'at frequecy ω_d = Δ0/10'; this should be 'frequency'.
  4. [Section III B] The text switches between the continuous-wave amplitude E_0 used in the analytic rates and the peak pulse field E_p used in the numerics; the statement that E_p should replace E_0 is physically reasonable, but the approximation should be justified more explicitly, since the pulse envelope modifies the effective duration available for tunneling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central derivation starts from the Hubbard Hamiltonian and an explicit variational ansatz, is benchmarked against the independent rigid-band results of Ref. [23], and does not back-fit any target observable through free parameters.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain starts from the explicit Hubbard Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) and an explicit variational density matrix (Eq. 5), with inputs U, tau, Gamma, and T_pump stated as material and pump parameters rather than fitted to the target outputs. The analytic photoexcitation rates (Eqs. 11-14 and 16) follow by expansion in d_t phi and by the Bessel/Jacobi-Anger structure of a monochromatic Peierls drive; no target observable is back-substituted into the derivation. The multiphoton and dc-tunneling limits are benchmarked against the functional forms of the independent 1D calculation in Ref. [23]. The finite-frequency tunneling enhancement and the cooperative region are derived (App. D3b) from the same resonance-matching procedure, and later compared to numerical solutions of the same evolution equations; this is an internal consistency check, not a fit of the predicted quantity. The acknowledged incompleteness in App. D3b ('a more precise calculation needs to count all possible combinations') limits the analytic precision of the gamma(omega_d) enhancement but does not make the argument circular. The self-citations with overlapping authorship (e.g., Refs. [34,67]) are used as experimental motivation or future-direction context and are not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely by citation. The lack of an exact numerical benchmark (DMFT, MPS, or exact diagonalization) for the variational ansatz is a correctness and robustness concern, not a circularity. No circular step could be identified and quoted, so the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rest on a variational mean-field decoupling of the Hubbard interaction, a factorized Gaussian density matrix, and a single dephasing rate. These are stated, but they are not benchmarked against numerically exact methods in the strong-drive regime. The analytic results additionally assume a rigid band and small ∂tφ; the finite-frequency tunneling derivation further assumes equal frequency components. No target data are fitted: U, τ, Γ, and T_pump are inputs chosen for cuprate-like parameters.

free parameters (5)
  • Hubbard interaction U = 1.93 eV
    On-site interaction chosen to represent cuprate parent compounds with U/τ ~ 10; input parameter, not fitted to the paper's predictions.
  • Nearest-neighbor hopping τ = 189 meV
    Hopping chosen with U/τ ≈ 10.2 to approximate one-band cuprate models; input parameter.
  • Dephasing rate Γ = 1.64 meV
    Single effective Markovian dephasing rate acting in all momentum sectors; chosen small relative to Δ0 = 1.8 eV. Its finite value creates the incoherent low-field regime.
  • Pump duration T_pump = 100 fs
    Gaussian envelope width (141 fs field width); chosen to be short compared with intraband relaxation, as assumed in Eq. (19).
  • Pump penetration depth λ_pump = 100a
    Used in Section V to create a spatially nonuniform drive for acoustic phonon generation; chosen by hand.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Mean-field SDW factorization of the Hubbard interaction keeps only q=0 and q=Q=(π,π) correlators.
    Appendix A2, Eqs. (A9)-(A15). The entire variational Hamiltonian (A16) and the order parameter evolution rely on this decoupling.
  • domain assumption Gaussian product-state density matrix factorizes over k and spin sectors, with only two-point correlators.
    Appendix C1, Eq. (C1), and main text Eq. (5); restricts dynamics to independent zero-total-momentum doublon-hole sectors.
  • domain assumption Pump duration is much shorter than intraband relaxation, so inter-k scattering is neglected and a single dephasing rate Γ acts.
    Main text Eq. (19) and Appendix C2; used to drop Γ_relax from the ρz equation and to define Γ = Γ_relax + 2Γ_deph.
  • domain assumption Rigid-band approximation S(t) ≈ S0 for analytic rates.
    Appendix D1, Eq. (D1); used to derive the multiphoton, tunneling, and incoherent rate formulas (11)-(16).
  • domain assumption Expansion parameter (∂t φ)/U small and eEa ≤ U in the analytic treatment.
    Appendix D1; justifies the perturbative treatment of ∂tφ and the rigid-band analytic rates.
  • domain assumption Long-range Néel order along z with ordering wavevector Q = (π,π).
    Eqs. (2)-(3) and Appendix A2; authors argue only short-range correlations are essential above T_N (footnote 69).
  • domain assumption Timescale separation T_pump << τ_intraband << τ_acoustic << τ_recombination.
    Eq. (19); used in Section V to treat electronic expectations as a quench for acoustic phonons and to ignore recombination.
  • domain assumption Pulsed driving replaced by monochromatic field in analytic derivations.
    Appendix D2/D3; expansions in harmonics of ω_d and Jacobi-Anger; Section D4 acknowledges non-monochromatic corrections.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Subgap pumping of antiferromagnetic Mott insulators: photoexcitation mechanisms and applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/76NLYZSG

@misc{pith2026250515343,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Subgap pumping of antiferromagnetic Mott insulators: photoexcitation mechanisms and applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/76NLYZSG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15343}
}
read the original abstract

We study the behavior of the 2D repulsive Hubbard model on a square lattice at half filling, under strong driving with ac electric fields, by employing a time-dependent Gaussian variational approach. Within the same theoretical framework, we analytically obtain the conventional Keldysh crossover between multiphoton and tunneling photoexcitation mechanisms, as well as two new regimes beyond the Keldysh paradigm. We discuss how dynamical renormalization of the Mott-Hubbard gap feeds back into the photoexcitation process, modulating the carrier generation rate in real time. The momentum distribution of quasiparticle excitations immediately after the drive is calculated, and shown to contain valuable information about the generation mechanism. Finally, we discuss experimental probing of the pump-induced nonequilibrium electronic state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.15343 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Schematic depiction of photoexcitation regimes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Momentum distribution of photoexcited quasiparticles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Normalized deviation in photocarrier density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Typical time dependence of total carrier density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Effects of gap renormalization on multiphoton frequency conditions. Left: pumping the system on-resonance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Real-time illustration of photocarrier saturation, due to exiting a resonance region. Driving parameters are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Effective lowering of a multiphoton threshold, due to gap renormalization. Real-time photocarrier density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Typical shape for the density of states, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Typical Fourier transforms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Constant energy contours in the magnetic BZ, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: For a weak electric field, tuning the pump frequency moves the region in the BZ resonant with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Crossing the boundary between photoexcitation regimes by tuning pump frequency: above the 3-photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Crossing the incoherent / multiphoton regime boundary by increasing the driving field, for a fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Momentum distributions in the 3-photon regime, with slight gap suppression. Calculated for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: Momentum distributions in the 2-photon regime, with stronger gap suppression; although the driving [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_19.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Oka, Nonlinear doublon production in a mott insu- lator: Landau-dykhne method applied to an integrable model, Phys

    T. Oka, Nonlinear doublon production in a mott insu- lator: Landau-dykhne method applied to an integrable model, Phys. Rev. B86, 075148 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [1]

    System Hamiltonian and external drive As a prototype of strongly interacting electron systems, we consider a 2D single-band Fermi-Hubbard model at half filling, with an on-site interaction termUtaken to be much stronger than the nearest-neighbor hoppingτ. Assuming that the external driving is spatially uniform, we incorporate it in the Hamiltonian via a P...

    work page

  3. [2]

    Order parameter and factorizing the interaction term The relevant SDW operator on the square lattice, with ˆztaken as the ordering axis, is [71] Sz Q ≡ 1 N X k,β,γ c† k+Q,β σβγ z ck,γ = 1 N X k,α α c† k+Q,αck,α. (A6) This will acquire an expectation valueS 0 in the varia- tional ground state|Ω⟩: Ω|Sz Q|Ω ≡S 0.(A7) The self-consistent variational approach ...

    work page

  4. [3]

    1 2 1 + ϵk(t)p ϵ2 k(t) + (U S(t)/2)2 !#1/2 ,(A19a) vk(t) =

    Solution of the decoupled Hamiltonian, and self-consistency condition Ignoring the energy-shift terms in (A15), we are left with H HF(t) = X k,α ϵk(t)c † k,αck,α − U S(t) 2 X k,α α c† k+Q,αck,α = X k∈BZ ′ α ϵk(t)c † k,αck,α +ϵ k+Q(t)c † k+Q,αck+Q,α − U S(t) 2 α c† k+Q,αck,α − U S(t) 2 α c† k,αck+Q,α = X k∈BZ ′ α c† k,α c† k+Q,α ϵk(t)−αU S(t)/2 −αU S(t)/2−...

    work page

  5. [4]

    The observable’s expectation becomes ⟨O⟩= trace(Oρ) =O 0 + 2Oxρx + 2Oyρy −O zρz + (Odouble +O empty −2O 0)ρ t (C30) a

    Computing observables An observable defined on a single (k, α) sector can be expanded as O=O 0 σ0 +O x ασx +O y ασy +O z σz +O doublePdouble +O emptyPempty (C29) whereP double projects onto the doubly-occupied state in the sector, andP empty onto the electronic vacuum. The observable’s expectation becomes ⟨O⟩= trace(Oρ) =O 0 + 2Oxρx + 2Oyρy −O zρz + (Odou...

    work page

  6. [5]

    On the other hand, (∂φ) ω mostly gets contributions at frequencies set by the pump field strengthE(via Bloch oscillations) or the pump frequency ωd itself

    Incoherent excitation mechanism As discussed previously,H(Ω, ω) will have most of its weight where Ω is low, andωis on the order of the gap ∆ =U S. On the other hand, (∂φ) ω mostly gets contributions at frequencies set by the pump field strengthE(via Bloch oscillations) or the pump frequency ωd itself. In the regimeℏω d, eEa≪∆, these two terms will be far...

    work page 1920

  7. [8]

    Kaiser, S

    S. Kaiser, S. R. Clark, D. Nicoletti, G. Cotugno, R. I. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Lupi, H. Okamoto, T. Hasegawa, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, Optical Properties of a Vi- brationally Modulated Solid State Mott Insulator, Scien- tific Reports4, 3823 (2014), publisher: Nature Publish- ing Group

    2014

  8. [9]

    Novelli, G

    F. Novelli, G. De Filippis, V. Cataudella, M. Espos- ito, I. Vergara, F. Cilento, E. Sindici, A. Amaricci, C. Giannetti, D. Prabhakaran, S. Wall, A. Perucchi, S. Dal Conte, G. Cerullo, M. Capone, A. Mishchenko, M. Gr¨ uninger, N. Nagaosa, F. Parmigiani, and D. Fausti, Witnessing the formation and relaxation of dressed quasi- particles in a strongly correl...

    work page 2014

Show all 81 references
  1. [10]

    X. Wang, R. Y. Engel, I. Vaskivskyi, D. Turenne, V. Shokeen, A. Yaroslavtsev, O. Gr ˚ an¨ as, R. Knut, J. O. Schunck, S. Dziarzhytski, G. Brenner, R.-P. Wang, M. Kuhlmann, F. Kuschewski, W. Bronsch, C. Sch¨ ußler- Langeheine, A. Styervoyedov, S. S. P. Parkin, F. Parmi- giani, ...

    2022

  2. [11]

    J. R. Hortensius, D. Afanasiev, M. Matthiesen, R. Leen- ders, R. Citro, A. V. Kimel, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, B. A. Ivanov, and A. D. Caviglia, Coherent spin-wave transport in an antiferromagnet, Nature Physics17, 1001 (2021), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2021

  3. [12]

    Radovskaia, R

    V. Radovskaia, R. Andrei, J. R. Hortensius, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, R. Citro, S. Chattopadhyay, M. X. Na, B. A. Ivanov, E. Demler, A. V. Kimel, A. D. Caviglia, and D. Afanasiev, Photoengineering the Magnon Spectrum in an Insulating Antiferromagnet (2025), arXiv:2505.00459 [cond-mat]

    2025 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Perfetti, P

    L. Perfetti, P. A. Loukakos, M. Lisowski, U. Boven- siepen, H. Berger, S. Biermann, P. S. Cornaglia, A. Georges, and M. Wolf, Time Evolution of the Elec- tronic Structure of$1T\mathrm{\text{\ensuremath{- }}}{\mathrm{TaS}} {2}$through the Insulator-Metal Transition, Physical Re...

    2006

  5. [14]

    Gillmeister, D

    K. Gillmeister, D. Goleˇ z, C.-T. Chiang, N. Bittner, Y. Pavlyukh, J. Berakdar, P. Werner, and W. Widdra, Ultrafast coupled charge and spin dynamics in strongly correlated NiO, Nature Communications11, 4095 (2020), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2020

  6. [15]

    M. P. M. Dean, Y. Cao, X. Liu, S. Wall, D. Zhu, R. Mankowsky, V. Thampy, X. M. Chen, J. G. Vale, D. Casa, J. Kim, A. H. Said, P. Juhas, R. Alonso-Mori, J. M. Glownia, A. Robert, J. Robinson, M. Sikorski, S. Song, M. Kozina, H. Lemke, L. Patthey, S. Owada, T. Katayama, M. Yabas...

    2016

  7. [16]

    D. Choi, C. Yue, D. Azoury, Z. Porter, J. Chen, F. Petoc- chi, E. Baldini, B. Lv, M. Mogi, Y. Su, S. D. Wilson, M. Eckstein, P. Werner, and N. Gedik, Light-induced in- sulator–metal transition in Sr2IrO4 reveals the nature of the insulating ground state, Proceedings of the Nat...

    2024

  8. [17]

    Stojchevska, I

    L. Stojchevska, I. Vaskivskyi, T. Mertelj, P. Kusar, D. Svetin, S. Brazovskii, and D. Mihailovic, Ultrafast Switching to a Stable Hidden Quantum State in an Elec- tronic Crystal, Science344, 177 (2014), publisher: Amer- ican Association for the Advancement of Science

    2014

  9. [18]

    Janod, J

    E. Janod, J. Tranchant, B. Corraze, M. Querr´ e, P. Stoliar, M. Rozenberg, T. Cren, D. Roditchev, V. T. Phuoc, M.-P. Besland, and L. Cario, Resistive Switching in Mott Insulators and Correlated Systems, Advanced Functional Materials25, 6287 (2015), eprint: https://onlinelibrar...

    2015 doi

  10. [19]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 041002 (2021), publisher: American Physical Society

    2021

  11. [20]

    Murakami, D

    Y. Murakami, D. Goleˇ z, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Photo-induced nonequilibrium states in mott insulators (2023), arXiv:2310.05201 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [21]

    L. V. Keldysh, Ionization in the Field of a Strong Elec- tromagnetic Wave, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.20, 1307 (1965)

    1965

  13. [22]

    For the detailed dependence ofξ/aonU/τ in the 1D Hubbard model, see also Ref

    In the limit of strong interactionsU/τ≫1 (see Section II for definitions of the interactionUand electron hopping τ), the correlation lengthξis on the order of the lattice constanta. For the detailed dependence ofξ/aonU/τ in the 1D Hubbard model, see also Ref. [68] and Figure 3...

  14. [24]

    Eckstein, T

    M. Eckstein, T. Oka, and P. Werner, Dielectric break- down of mott insulators in dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 146404 (2010). 19

    2010

  15. [25]

    Aron, Dielectric breakdown of a mott insulator, Phys

    C. Aron, Dielectric breakdown of a mott insulator, Phys. Rev. B86, 085127 (2012)

    2012

  16. [26]

    Eckstein and P

    M. Eckstein and P. Werner, Dielectric breakdown of mott insulators – doublon production and doublon heat- ing, Journal of Physics: Conference Series427, 012005 (2013)

    2013

  17. [27]

    Lee and K

    W.-R. Lee and K. Park, Dielectric breakdown via emer- gent nonequilibrium steady states of the electric-field- driven mott insulator, Phys. Rev. B89, 205126 (2014)

    2014

  18. [28]

    J. Li, C. Aron, G. Kotliar, and J. E. Han, Electric- field-driven resistive switching in the dissipative hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 226403 (2015)

    2015

  19. [29]

    Mazza, A

    G. Mazza, A. Amaricci, M. Capone, and M. Fabrizio, Field-driven mott gap collapse and resistive switch in cor- related insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 176401 (2016)

    2016

  20. [30]

    Udono, T

    M. Udono, T. Kaneko, and K. Sugimoto, Wannier-stark ladders and stark shifts of excitons in mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B108, L081304 (2023)

    2023

  21. [31]

    Tsuji, T

    N. Tsuji, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Correlated electron sys- tems periodically driven out of equilibrium: Floquet + dmft formalism, Phys. Rev. B78, 235124 (2008)

    2008

  22. [32]

    Herrmann, Y

    A. Herrmann, Y. Murakami, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Floquet prethermalization in the resonantly driven hub- bard model, Europhysics Letters120, 57001 (2018)

    2018

  23. [33]

    Murakami and P

    Y. Murakami and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium steady states of electric field driven mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B98, 075102 (2018)

    2018

  24. [34]

    X. Li, H. Ning, O. Mehio, H. Zhao, M.-C. Lee, K. Kim, F. Nakamura, Y. Maeno, G. Cao, and D. Hsieh, Keldysh space control of charge dynamics in a strongly driven mott insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 187402 (2022)

    2022

  25. [35]

    Goleˇ z, M

    D. Goleˇ z, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Dynamics of screening in photodoped mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B 92, 195123 (2015)

    2015

  26. [36]

    Goleˇ z, M

    D. Goleˇ z, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Multiband nonequilibrium gw + edmft formalism for correlated in- sulators, Phys. Rev. B100, 235117 (2019)

    2019

  27. [37]

    Goleˇ z, E

    D. Goleˇ z, E. Paprotzki, P. Werner, and M. Eckstein, The- ory of ultrafast screening of$U$in driven charge-transfer insulators: A time-resolved x-ray absorption study, Phys- ical Review B111, 045147 (2025), publisher: American Physical Society

    2025

  28. [38]

    Hackl, T

    L. Hackl, T. Guaita, T. Shi, J. Haegeman, E. Demler, and J. I. Cirac, Geometry of variational methods: dynamics of closed quantum systems, SciPost Phys.9, 048 (2020)

    2020

  29. [39]

    T. Shi, E. Demler, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Variational study of fermionic and bosonic systems with non-gaussian states: Theory and applications, Annals of Physics390, 245 (2018)

    2018

  30. [40]

    M. J. Stephen, Transport equations for superconductors, Phys. Rev.139, A197 (1965)

    1965

  31. [41]

    Betbeder-Matibet and P

    O. Betbeder-Matibet and P. Nozieres, Transport equa- tions in clean superconductors, Annals of Physics51, 392 (1969)

    1969

  32. [42]

    R. A. Barankov, L. S. Levitov, and B. Z. Spivak, Col- lective rabi oscillations and solitons in a time-dependent bcs pairing problem, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 160401 (2004)

    2004

  33. [43]

    E. A. Yuzbashyan, B. L. Altshuler, V. B. Kuznetsov, and V. Z. Enolskii, Solution for the dynamics of the bcs and central spin problems, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and General38, 7831 (2005)

    2005

  34. [44]

    E. A. Yuzbashyan, B. L. Altshuler, V. B. Kuznetsov, and V. Z. Enolskii, Nonequilibrium cooper pairing in the nonadiabatic regime, Phys. Rev. B72, 220503 (2005)

    2005

  35. [45]

    E. A. Yuzbashyan, O. Tsyplyatyev, and B. L. Altshuler, Relaxation and persistent oscillations of the order pa- rameter in fermionic condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 097005 (2006)

    2006

  36. [46]

    Chern and K

    G.-W. Chern and K. Barros, Nonequilibrium dynamics of superconductivity in the attractive hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B99, 035162 (2019)

    2019

  37. [47]

    J. R. Schrieffer, X. G. Wen, and S. C. Zhang, Dynamic spin fluctuations and the bag mechanism of high-T c su- perconductivity, Phys. Rev. B39, 11663 (1989)

    1989

  38. [48]

    Thomsen, H

    C. Thomsen, H. T. Grahn, H. J. Maris, and J. Tauc, Sur- face generation and detection of phonons by picosecond light pulses, Phys. Rev. B34, 4129 (1986)

    1986

  39. [49]

    Bozovic, M

    I. Bozovic, M. Schneider, Y. Xu, R. Sobolewski, Y. H. Ren, G. L¨ upke, J. Demsar, A. J. Taylor, and M. Onel- lion, Long-lived coherent acoustic waves generated by femtosecond light pulses, Phys. Rev. B69, 132503 (2004)

    2004

  40. [50]

    Ruello and V

    P. Ruello and V. E. Gusev, Physical mechanisms of coher- ent acoustic phonons generation by ultrafast laser action, Ultrasonics56, 21 (2015)

    2015

  41. [51]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 1698 (1979)

    1979

  42. [52]

    Johnston, F

    S. Johnston, F. Vernay, B. Moritz, Z.-X. Shen, N. Na- gaosa, J. Zaanen, and T. P. Devereaux, Systematic study of electron-phonon coupling to oxygen modes across the cuprates, Phys. Rev. B82, 064513 (2010)

    2010

  43. [53]

    Sheshadri, D

    K. Sheshadri, D. Malterre, A. Fujimori, and A. Chainani, Connecting the one-band and three-band hubbard mod- els of cuprates via spectroscopy and scattering experi- ments, Phys. Rev. B107, 085125 (2023)

    2023

  44. [54]

    Note that only the short-range part of AFM correlations is essential here, so the results will also be qualitatively valid aboveT N ; see Appendix A 1 for further discussion

  45. [55]

    (8) directly is much more convenient than computingφ k(ω) and multiplying byiω; hence the unusual notation

    Note that Fourier transforming eq. (8) directly is much more convenient than computingφ k(ω) and multiplying byiω; hence the unusual notation. The resonance condi- tion (10) is also more transparent in this form

  46. [56]

    However, for our strongly-interacting regimeU/τ∼10, we haveξ≈a, and for simplicity we useaas our typical length scale

    As discussed in the introduction, the length scale charac- terizing this crossover in the literature is the doublon-hole correlation lengthξ, rather than the lattice constanta. However, for our strongly-interacting regimeU/τ∼10, we haveξ≈a, and for simplicity we useaas our typ...

  47. [57]

    We remark that resonant features have been numerically found in a different context, when analyzing nonequilib- rium steady states of continuously driven Mott insula- tors in infinite dimensions [33]. However, we expect the extremely high field strengths considered in that cas...

  48. [58]

    2b whereµ matches the multiphoton ordernare very narrow, com- pared to the area marked ‘Multiphoton excitation’ in Fig- ure 1

    At first, it may seem surprising that the regionsAt first, it may seem surprising that the regions in Fig. 2b whereµ matches the multiphoton ordernare very narrow, com- pared to the area marked ‘Multiphoton excitation’ in Fig- ure 1. Part of the cause is the strongly-peaked de...

  49. [59]

    S. Ito, M. Sch¨ uler, M. Meierhofer, S. Schlauderer, J. Freudenstein, J. Reimann, D. Afanasiev, K. A. Kokh, O. E. Tereshchenko, J. G¨ udde, M. A. Sentef, U. H¨ ofer, and R. Huber, Build-up and dephasing of floquet–bloch bands on subcycle timescales, Nature616, 696 (2023)

    2023

  50. [60]

    Abergel, Band build-up, Nature Physics19, 621 (2023)

    D. Abergel, Band build-up, Nature Physics19, 621 (2023)

    2023

  51. [61]

    R¨ osch and O

    O. R¨ osch and O. Gunnarsson, Electron-Phonon In- teraction in the$t\mathrm{\text{\ensuremath{-}}}J$ Model, Physical Review Letters92, 146403 (2004), pub- lisher: American Physical Society

    2004

  52. [62]

    T. P. Devereaux, A. Virosztek, and A. Zawadowski, Neutron scattering and the${B} {1g}$phonon in the cuprates, Physical Review B59, 14618 (1999), publisher: American Physical Society

    1999

  53. [63]

    Strohmaier, D

    N. Strohmaier, D. Greif, R. J¨ ordens, L. Tarruell, H. Moritz, T. Esslinger, R. Sensarma, D. Pekker, E. Alt- man, and E. Demler, Observation of elastic doublon de- cay in the fermi-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 080401 (2010)

    2010

  54. [64]

    Sensarma, D

    R. Sensarma, D. Pekker, E. Altman, E. Demler, N. Strohmaier, D. Greif, R. J¨ ordens, L. Tarruell, H. Moritz, and T. Esslinger, Lifetime of double occu- pancies in the fermi-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B82, 224302 (2010)

    2010

  55. [65]

    Werner and M

    P. Werner and M. Eckstein, Phonon-enhanced relaxation and excitation in the holstein-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B88, 165108 (2013)

    2013

  56. [66]

    Optical phonons may contribute to Γ, an argument which is sketched in Section B 1

    Electron-phonon coupling has not been explicitly con- sidered in previous sections because acoustic phonon en- ergies are too low to significantly alter the high-energy photoexcitaton process. Optical phonons may contribute to Γ, an argument which is sketched in Section B 1

  57. [67]

    Mehio, X

    O. Mehio, X. Li, H. Ning, Z. Lenarˇ ciˇ c, Y. Han, M. Buch- hold, Z. Porter, N. J. Laurita, S. D. Wilson, and D. Hsieh, A hubbard exciton fluid in a photo-doped antiferromag- netic mott insulator, Nature Physics19, 1876 (2023)

    2023

  58. [68]

    C. A. Stafford and A. J. Millis, Scaling theory of the mott-hubbard metal-insulator transition in one dimen- sion, Phys. Rev. B48, 1409 (1993)

    1993

  59. [69]

    AboveTN , we re- tain strong short-range spin correlations even in the ab- sence of long-range order

    At low temperatures, we expect an AFM phase, where the N´ eel order assumption is justified. AboveTN , we re- tain strong short-range spin correlations even in the ab- sence of long-range order. As the typical doublon-hole correlation length is short - on the order of a few la...

  60. [70]

    This justifies ignoring the direct effect of the electric field on the SSH part of the Hamiltonian

    During the drive, Peierls phases should also be added to the hopping terms in (A5); however, we will only consider pulses of much shorter duration compared to the char- acteristic timescale of the low-energy acoustic phonons. This justifies ignoring the direct effect of the el...

  61. [71]

    In real space, this readsS z Q = 1 N P j eiQ·j (nj↑ −n j↓)

  62. [72]

    However, sinceS(t) is time-dependent, this term should be considered towards conservation of energy

  63. [73]

    We are ignoring Γrelax in the equation forρ z, but keeping it in those forρ x/y. The reason is that, in the former case, it only leads to a (slow) redistribution of the photoex- cited carriers between momentum states; in the latter, it strongly impacts excitation rates under w...

  64. [74]

    However, performing this procedure is not 25 straightfoward in the original electron basis, due to the strong Hubbard interaction

    Effect of phonons on short timescales For the duration of the pump, we are interested in the phonons as a source of decoherence and relaxation of quasiparticles, so we can integrate them out to obtain jump operators. However, performing this procedure is not 25 straightfoward ...

  65. [75]

    magnons, optical phonons, etc)

    Coherent phonons at intermediate times Following photoexcitation, quasiparticles can relax within their respective Hubbard bands, by transferring energy to other degrees of freedom (e.g. magnons, optical phonons, etc). After this has occurred, but on timescales still shorter t...

  66. [76]

    To include effects of quasipar- ticle scattering / dephasing, we formulate the problem as an open system

    Density-matrix ansatz As discussed in section A 2, we employ a Gaussian ansatz which captures correlations between operators with momentakandk+Qand identical spins, while taking other expectations of the form D c† kck+q E to van- ish wheneverq/∈ {0,Q}. To include effects of qu...

  67. [77]

    Combined with the assumption that all sectors start in their respective|Ω k⟩, we see that the drive will only couple the first two states in each basis

    Time evolution of density matrix elements Since we restrict our attention to spatially uniform driving of the system, only doublon-hole pairs at zero total momentum will be created, and the electronic occupations of each momentum sector defined above will be constant. Combined...

  68. [78]

    Time evolution of order parameter We now turn to the evolution ofS, which is coupled to the system (C18) via the definition (C8) ofφ, as well as its presence in the quasiparticle dispersion (A21). Recall the expression (A24) forS z Q in the doublon/hole basis: Sz Q = 1 N X k∈B...

  69. [79]

    Rather, the system of equations (C18) contains another natural expansion parameter in the form of (∂tφ)/U

    Perturbative approach As the tunneling expression (13) contains an expo- nential dependence onE −1, it will not be recovered by standard perturbation theory in the electric field E. Rather, the system of equations (C18) contains another natural expansion parameter in the form ...

  70. [80]

    It follows from the structure of the equations (D2) that ρz will contain contributions at even order in (∂ tφ)/U, whileρ + will only have odd ones. Then, at first order, useρ (0) z = 1 to find ∂tρ(1) + = ∂tφ 2 + 2i(E k +iΓ)ρ (1) + (D3) The complication is thatE k is also time-...

  71. [81]

    Consider for simplicity a monochromatic drive E=E 0 cos(ωdt), such that the vector potential is given byA(t) =−(E 0/ωd) sin(ωdt)

    High-frequency regime We start by recovering the conventional multiphoton and dc tunneling regimes, in the absence of decoherence terms; let Γ→0 +, and work with the expression (D15). Consider for simplicity a monochromatic drive E=E 0 cos(ωdt), such that the vector potential ...

  72. [82]

    Low-frequency regime Having recovered the usual multiphoton dependence from the high-frequency limitℏω d ≫ E0ea, we turn to the opposite regimeℏω d ≪ E0ea, to investigate tunneling. a. DC limit Let us first considerω d →0, which allows for the vector potential to be taken of t...

  73. [83]

    Non-monochromatic driving In a realistic experimental setting, and especially when strong electric fields are required, the sample will be pumped with short laser pulses, which will therefore con- tain a finite range of frequencies. In general, we should write for the field an...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.