Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 84 references

Symmetries and selection rules in photoelectron chiral dichroism from tailored light

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that every static or time-translational dynamical symmetry of a driving laser field becomes a selection rule in photoelectron circular dichroism, predicting two new parity rules for fields with inversion and…

desk verdict A solid Floquet-group framework for PECD selection rules with two new, likely correct predictions; the main derivation gap is fixable and should be addressed before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.16273 v1 pith:VVIHS4EG submitted 2025-05-22 physics.chem-ph physics.optics

Ofer Neufeld This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phphysics.optics
keywords photoelectroncirculardichroismchiralmoleculesdynamicalsymmetriesselectionrulestailoredlightgrouptheoryFloquettime-dependentdensityfunctional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a general group-theoretic link between symmetries of a tailored driving laser field and selection rules in photoelectron circular dichroism (PECD), the momentum-resolved difference in photoemission between enantiomers. The rule is that any symmetry of the electric field that is static or involves time translations becomes a selection rule in the PECD spectrum: rotational parts of the symmetry make the spectrum invariant under the same rotation of photoelectron momentum, while mirror parts force the PECD signal to be odd across the mirror plane. From this, the paper predicts two previously unknown selection rules: fields with dynamical inversion symmetry yield PECD odd under a two-fold rotation, and fields with dynamical improper-rotational symmetry of order four yield PECD odd under a four-fold rotation in the transverse plane and even under a two-fold rotation in other planes. The predictions are demonstrated with ab initio time-dependent density functional theory simulations on Bromochlorofluoromethane. If correct, the framework lets experimentalists choose laser symmetries to shape which parts of a chiral photoelectron spectrum carry information.

What carries the argument

The machinery is Floquet group theory for the driving field—a catalog of symmetries of a time-periodic electric field expressed as combined temporal and point-group operations—together with the decomposition of improper rotations into a rotation times a transverse mirror, $S_n = R_n \sigma_h$. The rotation part maps onto rotational invariance of the photoemission; the transverse mirror maps onto handedness exchange $R \leftrightarrow S$, which inserts a minus sign into the PECD subtraction. This decomposition is what converts a symmetry of the laser into a parity statement about the differential spectrum, and it is what generates the two new selection rules.

What would settle it

Measure or compute PECD in a gas of a chiral molecule driven by a long, non-collinear co-rotating $\omega$--$3\omega$ pulse with dynamical inversion symmetry. If $PECD(k_x,k_y,k_z)$ and $-PECD(-k_x,-k_y,k_z)$ differ systematically at long pulse durations, or if the relation fails for a second chiral molecule, the predicted selection rule is wrong. A complementary check is the total ionization chiral dichroism: the framework predicts it tends to zero as pulse duration grows, so a persistent nonzero integrated signal at long duration would refute the mapping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Floquet group of the driving electric field—the catalogue of its static and time-translational point-group symmetries—maps onto the symmetry skeleton of PECD spectra. For a dynamical symmetry whose point-group part is a rotation coupled to a time translation, the photoemission of each enantiomer is invariant under that rotation, so the subtracted PECD spectrum inherits the same invariance. For a point-group part that contains a mirror, the mirror acts on the randomly oriented molecular ensemble as an exchange of handedness $R \leftrightarrow S$, and because PECD is defined as $(P_R - P_S)/(P_R + P_S)$, that exchange produces a minus sign, making PECD odd across the mirror plane. Applying this to a non-collinear co-rotating $\omega$--$3\omega$ field with dynamical inversion symmetry predicts $PECD(k_x,k_y,k_z) = - PECD(-k_x,-k_y,k_z)$, and applying it to a crossed $\omega$--$2\omega$--$3\omega$ field with dynamical improper-rotational symmetry of order four predicts oddness under four-fold rotation in the transverse plane and evenness under two-fold rotation in the other two planes. The ab initio simulations reproduce both signatures, with deviations that shrink as the pulse duration grows.

Load-bearing premise

The argument relies on the premise that a mirror operation in the driving field acts on the randomly oriented chiral ensemble exactly like swapping molecular handedness, so that the PECD subtraction acquires a global minus sign; this premise is asserted from symmetry considerations rather than derived from the orientation-averaged ionization amplitudes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any static mirror plane in the driving field forces the usual forwards-backwards oddness of PECD; removing that mirror, for example by full three-dimensional polarization, removes the forwards-backwards asymmetry.
  • Fields with dynamical inversion symmetry impose a two-fold rotational oddness on PECD even though no plane of the spectrum is left-right symmetric.
  • Fields with dynamical improper-rotational symmetry of order four impose a four-fold rotational oddness in the transverse plane and a two-fold evenness in the other planes.
  • Selection rules from dynamical symmetries are only approximate for pulsed driving and become exact as the pulse lengthens, so pulse duration controls how strictly the parity relations hold.
  • Deliberately breaking all symmetries except the unavoidable forward-backward mirror, for example with collinear bi-elliptical beams, removes degeneracies and exposes more independent information in PECD spectra for ultrafast spectroscopy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Pith inference: because the argument uses only the Floquet group of the field and the R-minus-S structure of the observable, the same two classes of selection rules should appear in any enantio-sensitive observable built from the same subtraction, including energy-resolved or angle-integrated ionization yields.
  • Pith inference: the approximate nature of dynamical-symmetry rules gives a practical handle—few-cycle pulses with dynamical inversion symmetry produce a small but tunable total ionization chiral dichroism, so pulse duration could be used to control enantio-enrichment rather than only to approach the ideal selection rule.
  • Pith inference: testing a second chiral molecule under the same tailored fields would separate the universal symmetry prediction from molecule-specific amplitudes; the paper's ab initio demonstration on one molecule supports, but does not prove, the general rule.
  • Pith inference: the framework deliberately excludes time-reversal symmetries; extending the analysis to fields whose Floquet group includes time-reversal elements could yield additional constraints on PECD, and these would be experimentally distinguishable from the improper-rotation rules because they would not be tied to an R-to-S handedness swap.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a group-theoretic framework for deriving PECD selection rules from dynamical symmetries of tailored laser fields. It claims that rotational parts of a field symmetry map to invariance of the PECD spectrum, while mirror/improper parts map to an odd, sign-flipped response. The framework is used to predict two previously unknown rules: dynamical inversion symmetry should make PECD odd under a two-fold rotation, and dynamical improper rotation of order four should make PECD odd under a four-fold rotation in the transverse plane. These predictions are tested with ab initio TDDFT simulations of Bromochlorofluoromethane for non-collinear ω-3ω and crossed ω-2ω-3ω fields. The paper also proposes symmetry-broken bi-elliptical co-linear fields as a route to richer ultrafast chiral information.

Significance. If the framework is correct, it provides a unifying explanation of known PECD symmetries and a practical design rule for tailored-light chiral spectroscopy. The main strengths are the concrete, falsifiable predictions of new selection rules, the absence of fitted parameters, and the numerical validation via state-of-the-art t-SURFF TDDFT calculations. The pulse-duration dependence of the total ionization CD provides a useful quantitative test of the adiabatic nature of dynamical-symmetry rules. The central weakness is that the mirror-to-minus-sign step in Section III.B is asserted rather than derived from the orientation-averaged photoionization amplitudes; this gap is load-bearing because both new selection rules follow from it, though it appears closable through the standard covariance identity. A further, potentially more serious issue is that the plane-projected selection rules for the S4 field seem mis-stated and need clarification.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III.B] The core claim that the mirror factor of an improper dynamical symmetry 'effectively acts as a molecular handedness replacement R to S' and therefore introduces a global minus sign in the PECD subtraction is asserted without derivation from the orientation-averaged ionization amplitudes. This assertion is load-bearing because both new selection rules in Section IV (the dynamical inversion rule and the improper rotation rule) follow from it. Please supply the missing derivation: for any improper orthogonal transformation g, covariance of the electric-dipole Hamiltonian under simultaneous transformation of field, molecular geometry, and photoelectron momentum gives P_R^E(k) = P_S^{gE}(g k) after orientational averaging; combined with the dynamical symmetry E(t) = g E(t+T/n) and time-translation invariance of the long-pulse spectrum, this yields P_R^E(k) = P_S^E(g k) and hence PECD(g k) = -PECD(k). With this identity, the heuristic statement in Section III.B becomes a rigorous result.
  2. [Section IV, Fig. 3] The plane-projected selection rules for the S4 field appear to be mis-stated. From the identity PECD(g k) = -PECD(k) with g = S4 about the z-axis, projecting onto the xz plane (integrating over ky) gives PECD_xz(-kx,-kz) = -PECD_xz(kx,kz), i.e., oddness under an in-plane 180° rotation. Since g^2 = C2 is a proper rotational dynamical symmetry, one also obtains PECD_xz(-kx,kz) = PECD_xz(kx,kz), and combining these gives PECD_xz(kx,-kz) = -PECD_xz(kx,kz), a forward-backward oddness in the xz and yz projections. The caption's 'even under R2 in xz and yz planes' and the statement in the text that the spectra 'are not forwards-backwards asymmetric' need to be reconciled with these relations. Please specify explicitly which operation R2 denotes (a 180° rotation about the z-axis versus an in-plane 180° rotation) and report which projected symmetry the simulations actually satisfy.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section II] The abstract says 'resolved a long-standing issue' but should be 'resolves a long-standing issue', and the heading 'METHOLOGY' is a typo for 'METHODOLOGY'.
  2. [Figure captions] Several figure captions contain garbled or missing numerical values, for example '5×10 13 W/cm2' should presumably read '5×10^13 W/cm2', and the wavelength value '8 nm' in the Fig. 4 caption appears to have missing digits.
  3. [Introduction and Section IV] The notation 'up-down' and 'left-right' is used inconsistently: in the Introduction the up-down symmetry is defined with respect to ky, but in Section IV the same terms seem to be applied to different axes in the xz and yz planes. Please define the axes for each projected plane explicitly.
  4. [Section III.B] The statement that time-reversal elements cannot lead to PECD selection rules is supported by a brief physical argument but no formal derivation or reference. Since this point is not central to the new predictions, a short justification or a citation would be sufficient.
  5. [Supplementary Material] The 'super-sine' envelope formula in the supplementary material is garbled in the text; please provide a correctly typeset expression.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PECD selection rules are derived from field symmetries and independently confirmed by ab-initio TDDFT; the mirror-to-minus-sign step is an abbreviated derivation, not a restatement of the result.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are not circular. PECD is defined as a normalized difference between R and S photoelectron spectra, and the derivation chain maps dynamical symmetries of the driving field onto symmetries of these spectra. For pure rotational dynamical symmetries, the argument is that the field symmetry is inherited by the photoemission spectrum of each enantiomer, so the PECD spectrum becomes invariant under the same rotation. For improper rotations, the paper decomposes S_n = R_n sigma_h and argues that the mirror factor sigma_h interchanges R and S enantiomers, producing a minus sign in the subtracted PECD expression. This step is verbally asserted rather than fully derived, and a rigorous derivation would need to show, via covariance of the dipole Hamiltonian under simultaneous transformation of field, molecular geometry, and electron momentum, that P_R^E(k) = P_S^{gE}(g k) after orientational averaging. But this is a derivational gap, not a circular restatement: the conclusion does not reduce to the input by construction, and the missing identity is an independent mathematical statement. The two new selection rules (odd behavior under R2 for dynamical inversion symmetry, and odd/even behavior under R4/R2 for dynamical S4 symmetry) are predictions made before the ab-initio simulations, and the TDDFT spectra are compared with them rather than fitted to produce them. No free parameters are extracted from the target spectra and renamed as predictions. Self-citations, e.g. the Floquet group theory framework of Ref. [53], provide background methodology that is externally established and independently applicable; no load-bearing uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives. Overall, the load-bearing argument has an explicable but unproven heuristic step, yet no step in the paper's derivation is equivalent to its own input. The appropriate circularity score is therefore 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard PECD assumptions (random orientation, O(3) symmetry of the medium, dipole approximation), on Floquet group theory from prior work, and on a new, verbally stated rule connecting mirror parts of field symmetries to sign flips in PECD. No free parameters are fitted to the spectra; the laser parameters in the simulations are chosen inputs, not fit parameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The randomly oriented chiral medium is invariant under all rotations, i.e. O(3), but does not respect mirrors, inversion, or improper rotations.
    Section III.A states this explicitly. It is what allows rotational field symmetries to become symmetries of the orientation-averaged PECD while mirror operations are treated as handedness swaps.
  • standard math Field symmetries of E(t) can be classified by Floquet group theory, and a dynamical symmetry E(t) = g E(t+tau) constrains time-averaged observables through the spatial operator g.
    Borrowed from refs. [53,73-75] and applied in Section III.A. The paper does not rederive Floquet group theory; it relies on it as a tool.
  • ad hoc to paper An improper rotation S_n can be written as R_n * sigma_h, and sigma_h maps each enantiomeric ensemble to the other; in the PECD subtraction this produces a minus sign.
    Section III.B introduces this as the mechanism for the two new selection rules. It is stated in words, not derived from the orientation average. Numerics for CBrClFH are consistent with it, but it remains a modeling assumption rather than a proven lemma.
  • domain assumption For pulsed driving, dynamical symmetry selection rules are approximate and converge as pulse duration grows.
    Stated in Section IV and shown in Fig. 2 through the decay of total ionization CD with pulse length. This assumption is needed to reconcile visible deviations in the spectra with the predicted exact symmetry.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetries and selection rules in photoelectron chiral dichroism from tailored light." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VVIHS4EG

@misc{pith2026250516273,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetries and selection rules in photoelectron chiral dichroism from tailored light},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VVIHS4EG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.16273}
}
read the original abstract

Photoelectron circular dichroism (PECD) is a method whereby randomly oriented chiral molecules are irradiated by circularly-polarized light, photoionizing electrons, which are measured in a momentum-resolved manner. This scheme permits chiral light-matter interactions within the electric-dipole approximation (avoiding weak magnetic-dipole interactions), yielding huge chiral signals in the form of a forwards-backwards asymmetry in photoemission. Recently, more intricate realizations of PECD have been explored where the circularly-polarized light is replaced with elaborate polarization-tailored light (e.g. bi-chromatic, non-collinear, etc.), some of which do not even require circularly-polarized components, but still lead to massive chiral signals. However, the connection between generalized symmetries and asymmetries of the laser drive and selection rules in PECD have not yet been derived. Here we formulate this connection analytically from group theory, also predicting two previously unknown selection rules for PECD from fields with dynamical inversion and improper-rotational symmetries. We further propose bi-chromatic bi-elliptical fields for breaking symmetries in typical spectra, yielding potentially more information for ultrafast-resolved measurements. We numerically demonstrate all of our results with state-of-the-art ab-initio simulations in the archetypal chiral molecule, Bromochlorofluoromethane, providing predictions for experiments. Our work presents a roadmap for analyzing PECD from tailored light and resolved a long-standing issue in the field. It should motivate theoretical and experimental investigations in novel PECD set-ups.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [79]

    Habibovi ć, W

    D. Habibovi ć, W. Becker, D. B. Milo šević, Symmetries and Selection Rules of the Spectra of Photoelectrons and High-Order Harmonics Generated by Field -Driven Atoms and Molecules. Symmetry (Basel). (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [1]

    E. M. Carreira, H. Yamamoto, Comprehensive Chirality (Elsevier Ltd., 2012)

    2012

  3. [2]

    Hosur, S

    P. Hosur, S. Ryu, A. Vishwanath, Chiral topological insulators, superconductors, and other competing orders in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. B 81, 045120 (2010)

    2010

  4. [3]

    S.-T. Wang, D. -L. Deng, L. -M. Duan, Probe of Three -Dimensional Chiral Topological Insulators in an Optical Lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 033002 (2014)

    2014

  5. [4]

    Meyer-Ilse, D

    J. Meyer-Ilse, D. Akimov, B. Dietzek, Recent advances in ultrafast time-resolved chirality measurements: perspective and outlook. Laser Photon. Rev. 7, 495–505 (2013)

    2013

  6. [5]

    I. K. Reddy, R. Mehvar, Chirality in Drug Design and Development (CRC Press, 2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [6]

    Guerrero-Martínez, J

    A. Guerrero-Martínez, J. L. Alonso -Gómez, B. Auguié, M. M. Cid, L. M. Liz -Marzán, From individual to collective chirality in metal nanoparticles. Nano Today 6, 381–400 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [7]

    Berova, P

    N. Berova, P. L. Polavarapu, K. Nakanishi, R. W. Woody, Comprehensive Chiroptical Spectroscopy (Wiley, 2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 84 references
  1. [8]

    Ayuso, A

    D. Ayuso, A. F. Ordonez, O. Smirnova, Ultrafast chirality: the road to efficient chiral measurements. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 26962–26991 (2022)

    2022

  2. [9]

    Baykusheva, et al., Real-time probing of chirality during a chemical reaction

    D. Baykusheva, et al., Real-time probing of chirality during a chemical reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 23923–23929 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    Svoboda, et al

    V. Svoboda, et al. , Femtosecond photoelectron circular dichroism of chemical reactions. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq2811 (2023). 10

    2023

  4. [11]

    Beaulieu, et al

    S. Beaulieu, et al. , Attosecond -resolved photoionization of chiral molecules. Science 358, 1288 –1294 (2017)

    2017

  5. [12]

    Cireasa, et al., Probing molecular chirality on a sub -femtosecond timescale

    R. Cireasa, et al., Probing molecular chirality on a sub -femtosecond timescale. Nat. Phys. 11, 654–658 (2015)

    2015

  6. [13]

    Quack, J

    M. Quack, J. Stohner, Influence of Parity Violating Weak Nuclear Potentials on Vibrational and Rotational Frequencies in Chiral Molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3807–3810 (2000)

    2000

  7. [14]

    I. Erez, E. R. Wallach, Y. Shagam, Simultaneous Enantiomer -Resolved Ramsey Spectroscopy Scheme for Chiral Molecules. Phys. Rev. X 13, 41025 (2023)

    2023

  8. [15]

    Neufeld, O

    O. Neufeld, O. Wengrowicz, O. Peleg, A. Rubio, O. Cohen, Detecting multiple chiral centers in chiral molecules with high harmonic generation. Opt. Express 30, 3729–3740 (2022)

    2022

  9. [16]

    Habibović, K

    D. Habibović, K. R. Hamilton, O. Neufeld, L. Rego, Emerging tailored light sources for studying chirality and symmetry. Nat. Rev. Phys. (2024). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-024-00763-8

    2024 doi

  10. [17]

    Fischer, D

    P. Fischer, D. S. Wiersma, R. Righini, B. Champagne, A. D. Buckingham, Three-Wave Mixing in Chiral Liquids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4253–4256 (2000)

    2000

  11. [18]

    Leibscher, T

    M. Leibscher, T. F. Giesen, C. P. Koch, Principles of enantio -selective excitation in three -wave mixing spectroscopy of chiral molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 151, 14302 (2019)

    2019

  12. [19]

    Patterson, M

    D. Patterson, M. Schnell, J. M. Doyle, Enantiomer -specific detection of chiral molecules via microwave spectroscopy. Nature 497, 475 (2013)

    2013

  13. [20]

    Pérez, et al., Coherent Enantiomer-Selective Population Enrichment Using Tailored Microwave Fields

    C. Pérez, et al., Coherent Enantiomer-Selective Population Enrichment Using Tailored Microwave Fields. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 56, 12512–12517 (2017)

    2017

  14. [21]

    Eibenberger, J

    S. Eibenberger, J. Doyle, D. Patterson, Enantiomer -Specific State Transfer of Chiral Molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 123002 (2017)

    2017

  15. [22]

    Lee, et al., Quantitative Study of Enantiomer -Specific State Transfer

    J. Lee, et al., Quantitative Study of Enantiomer -Specific State Transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 173001 (2022)

    2022

  16. [23]

    Ayuso, et al

    D. Ayuso, et al. , Synthetic chiral light for efficient control of chiral light –matter interaction. Nat. Photonics 13, 866–871 (2019)

    2019

  17. [24]

    Neufeld, et al

    O. Neufeld, et al. , Ultrasensitive Chiral Spectroscopy by Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in High Harmonic Generation. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031002 (2019)

    2019

  18. [25]

    Fischer, F

    P. Fischer, F. W. Wise, A. C. Albrecht, Chiral and Achiral Contributions to Sum -Frequency Generation from Optically Active Solutions of Binaphthol. J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 8232–8238 (2003)

    2003

  19. [26]

    J.-H. Choi, S. Cheon, M. Cho, Calculations of vibrationally resonant sum - and difference -frequency- generation spectra of chiral molecules in solutions: Three -wave-mixing vibrational optical activity. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 74506 (2010)

    2010

  20. [27]

    M. A. Belkin, T. A. Kulakov, K.-H. Ernst, L. Yan, Y. R. Shen, Sum-Frequency Vibrational Spectroscopy on Chiral Liquids: A Novel Technique to Probe Molecular Chirality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4474 –4477 (2000)

    2000

  21. [28]

    M. A. Belkin, S. H. Han, X. Wei, Y. R. Shen, Sum-Frequency Generation in Chiral Liquids near Electronic Resonance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 113001 (2001)

    2001

  22. [29]

    G. J. Simpson, Molecular Origins of the Remarkable Chiral Sensitivity of Second-Order Nonlinear Optics. ChemPhysChem 5, 1301–1310 (2004)

    2004

  23. [30]

    Fischer, Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy of Chiral Molecules

    P. Fischer, Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy of Chiral Molecules. Chirality 17, 421–437 (2005)

    2005

  24. [31]

    Ayuso, A

    D. Ayuso, A. F. Ordonez, P. Decleva, M. Ivanov, O. Smirnova, Enantio -sensitive unidirectional light bending. Nat. Commun. 12, 3951 (2021)

    2021

  25. [32]

    Baykusheva, H

    D. Baykusheva, H. J. W örner, Chiral Discrimination through Bielliptical High -Harmonic Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031060 (2018)

    2018

  26. [33]

    Pitzer, et al., Direct Determination of Absolute Molecular Stereochemistry in Gas Phase by Coulomb Explosion Imaging

    M. Pitzer, et al., Direct Determination of Absolute Molecular Stereochemistry in Gas Phase by Coulomb Explosion Imaging. Science 341, 1096–1100 (2013)

    2013

  27. [34]

    Herwig, et al., Imaging the Absolute Configuration of a Chiral Epoxide in the Gas Phase

    P. Herwig, et al., Imaging the Absolute Configuration of a Chiral Epoxide in the Gas Phase. Science 342, 1084–1086 (2013)

    2013

  28. [35]

    Bégin, et al., Nonlinear helical dichroism in chiral and achiral molecules

    J.-L. Bégin, et al., Nonlinear helical dichroism in chiral and achiral molecules. Nat. Photonics 17, 82–88 (2023)

    2023

  29. [36]

    Brullot, M

    W. Brullot, M. K. Vanbel, T. Swusten, T. Verbiest, Resolving enantiomers using the optical angular momentum of twisted light. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501349 (2023)

    2023

  30. [37]

    Mayer, et al

    N. Mayer, et al. , Chiral topological light for detection of robust enantiosensitive observables. Nat. Photonics 18, 1155–1160 (2024)

    2024

  31. [38]

    Böwering, et al., Asymmetry in Photoelectron Emission from Chiral Molecules Induced by Circularly Polarized Light

    N. Böwering, et al., Asymmetry in Photoelectron Emission from Chiral Molecules Induced by Circularly Polarized Light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1187–1190 (2001)

    2001

  32. [39]

    M. H. M. Janssen, I. Powis, Detecting chirality in molecules by imaging photoelectron circular dichroism. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 856–871 (2014)

    2014

  33. [40]

    S. B. and A. F. and R. G. and R. C. and D. D. and B. F. and N. F. and F. L. and S. P. and T. R. and V. B. 11 and Y. M. and B. Pons, Universality of photoelectron circular dichroism in the photoionization of chiral molecules. New J. Phys. 18, 102002 (2016)

    2016

  34. [41]

    A. D. M üller, E. Kutscher, A. N. Artemyev, P. V Demekhin, Photoelectron circular dichroism in the multiphoton ionization by short laser pulses. III. Photoionization of fenchone in different regimes. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 44302 (2020)

    2020

  35. [42]

    Ritchie, Theory of the angular distribution of photoelectrons ejected from optically active molecules and molecular negative ions

    B. Ritchie, Theory of the angular distribution of photoelectrons ejected from optically active molecules and molecular negative ions. Phys. Rev. A 13, 1411–1415 (1976)

    1976

  36. [43]

    Powis, Photoelectron circular dichroism of the randomly oriented chiral molecules glyceraldehyde and lactic acid

    I. Powis, Photoelectron circular dichroism of the randomly oriented chiral molecules glyceraldehyde and lactic acid. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 301–310 (2000)

    2000

  37. [44]

    Comby, et al

    A. Comby, et al. , Relaxation Dynamics in Photoexcited Chiral Molecules Studied by Time -Resolved Photoelectron Circular Dichroism: Toward Chiral Femtochemistry. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 4514–4519 (2016)

    2016

  38. [45]

    D. Faccialà, et al., Time-Resolved Chiral X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy with Transiently Enhanced Atomic Site Selectivity: A Free -Electron Laser Investigation of Electronically Excited Fenchone Enantiomers. Phys. Rev. X 13, 11044 (2023)

    2023

  39. [46]

    V Demekhin, A

    P. V Demekhin, A. N. Artemyev, A. Kastner, T. Baumert, Photoelectron Circular Dichroism with Two Overlapping Laser Pulses of Carrier Frequencies ω and 2 ω Linearly Polarized in Two Mutually Orthogonal Directions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 253201 (2018)

    2018

  40. [47]

    Rozen, et al., Controlling Subcycle Optical Chirality in the Photoionization of Chiral Molecules

    S. Rozen, et al., Controlling Subcycle Optical Chirality in the Photoionization of Chiral Molecules. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031004 (2019)

    2019

  41. [48]

    Hofmann, et al., Sub-cycle resolved strong field ionization of chiral molecules and the origin of chiral photoelectron asymmetries

    M. Hofmann, et al., Sub-cycle resolved strong field ionization of chiral molecules and the origin of chiral photoelectron asymmetries. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043176 (2024)

    2024

  42. [49]

    Neufeld, O

    O. Neufeld, O. Cohen, Optical Chirality in Nonlinear Optics: Application to High Harmonic Generation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 133206 (2018)

    2018

  43. [50]

    Neufeld, M

    O. Neufeld, M. Even Tzur, O. Cohen, Degree of chirality of electromagnetic fields and maximally chiral light. Phys. Rev. A 101, 053831 (2020)

    2020

  44. [51]

    Neufeld, O

    O. Neufeld, O. Cohen, Unambiguous definition of handedness for locally chiral light. Phys. Rev. A 105, 23514 (2022)

    2022

  45. [52]

    Neufeld, H

    O. Neufeld, H. Hübener, A. Rubio, U. De Giovannini, Strong chiral dichroism and enantiopurification in above-threshold ionization with locally chiral light. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L032006 (2021)

    2021

  46. [53]

    Neufeld, D

    O. Neufeld, D. Podolsky, O. Cohen, Floquet group theory and its application to selection rules in harmonic generation. Nat. Commun. 10, 405 (2019)

    2019

  47. [54]

    M. E. Tzur, O. Neufeld, E. Bordo, A. Fleischer, O. Cohen, Selection rules in symmetry -broken systems by symmetries in synthetic dimensions. Nat. Commun. 13, 1312 (2022)

    2022

  48. [55]

    Lerner, et al., Multiscale dynamical symmetries and selection rules in nonlinear optics

    G. Lerner, et al., Multiscale dynamical symmetries and selection rules in nonlinear optics. Sci. Adv. 9, eade0953 (2023)

    2023

  49. [56]

    Neufeld, N

    O. Neufeld, N. Tancogne -Dejean, U. De Giovannini, H. H übener, A. Rubio, Light -Driven Extremely Nonlinear Bulk Photogalvanic Currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 126601 (2021)

    2021

  50. [57]

    Weitz, et al

    T. Weitz, et al. , Lightwave -driven electrons in a Floquet topological insulator. arXiv Prepr. arXiv2407.17917 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Feldman, M

    M. Feldman, M. Even Tzur, O. Cohen, Selection Rules of Linear and Nonlinear Polarization -Selective Absorption in Optically Dressed Matter. Photonics (2024)

    2024

  52. [59]

    Neufeld, N

    O. Neufeld, N. Tancogne -Dejean, U. De Giovannini, H. H übener, A. Rubio, Attosecond magnetization dynamics in non -magnetic materials driven by intense femtosecond lasers. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 39 (2023)

    2023

  53. [60]

    Fleischer, N

    A. Fleischer, N. Moiseyev, Adiabatic theorem for non -Hermitian time-dependent open systems. Phys. Rev. A 72, 032103 (2005)

    2005

  54. [61]

    Ito, et al., Build-up and dephasing of Floquet –Bloch bands on subcycle timescales

    S. Ito, et al., Build-up and dephasing of Floquet –Bloch bands on subcycle timescales. Nature (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05850-x

    2023 doi

  55. [62]

    Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

    M. A. L. Marques, et al. , “Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory ” in Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory, (Springer, 2003)

    2003

  56. [63]

    Castro, et al., octopus: a tool for the application of time -dependent density functional theory

    A. Castro, et al., octopus: a tool for the application of time -dependent density functional theory. Phys. status solidi 243, 2465–2488 (2006)

    2006

  57. [64]

    Andrade, et al., Real-space grids and the Octopus code as tools for the development of new simulation approaches for electronic systems

    X. Andrade, et al., Real-space grids and the Octopus code as tools for the development of new simulation approaches for electronic systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 31371–31396 (2015)

    2015

  58. [65]

    Tancogne-Dejean, et al., Octopus, a computational framework for exploring light -driven phenomena and quantum dynamics in extended and finite systems

    N. Tancogne-Dejean, et al., Octopus, a computational framework for exploring light -driven phenomena and quantum dynamics in extended and finite systems. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 124119 (2020)

    2020

  59. [66]

    Hartwigsen, S

    C. Hartwigsen, S. Goedecker, J. Hutter, Relativistic separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials from H to Rn. Phys. Rev. B 58, 3641–3662 (1998)

    1998

  60. [67]

    Legrand, E

    C. Legrand, E. Suraud, P. -G. Reinhard, Comparison of self -interaction-corrections for metal clusters. J. 12 Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, 1115–1128 (2002)

    2002

  61. [68]

    L. Tao, A. Scrinzi, Photo-electron momentum spectra from minimal volumes: The time-dependent surface flux method. New J. Phys. 14, 013021 (2012)

    2012

  62. [69]

    Scrinzi, t -SURFF: fully differential two -electron photo -emission spectra

    A. Scrinzi, t -SURFF: fully differential two -electron photo -emission spectra. New J. Phys. 14, 085008 (2012)

    2012

  63. [70]

    Wopperer, U

    P. Wopperer, U. De Giovannini, A. Rubio, Efficient and accurate modeling of electron photoemission in nanostructures with TDDFT. Eur. Phys. J. B 90, 51 (2017)

    2017

  64. [71]

    S. A. Sato, H. H übener, A. Rubio, U. De Giovannini, First -principles simulations for attosecond photoelectron spectroscopy based on time -dependent density functional theory. Eur. Phys. J. B 91, 126 (2018)

    2018

  65. [72]

    De Giovannini, H

    U. De Giovannini, H. Hübener, A. Rubio, A First-Principles Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Framework for Spin and Time -Resolved Angular -Resolved Photoelectron Spectroscopy in Periodic Systems. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 265–273 (2017)

    2017

  66. [73]

    Averbukh, O

    V. Averbukh, O. E. Alon, N. Moiseyev, High -order harmonic generation by molecules of discrete rotational symmetry interacting with circularly polarized laser field. Phys. Rev. A 64, 033411 (2001)

    2001

  67. [74]

    O. E. Alon, V. Averbukh, N. Moiseyev, Atoms, Molecules, Crystals and Nanotubes in Laser Fields: From Dynamical Symmetry to Selective High -Order Harmonic Generation of Soft X -Rays. Adv. Quantum Chem. 47, 393–421 (2004)

    2004

  68. [75]

    O. E. Alon, V. Averbukh, N. Moiseyev, Selection Rules for the High Harmonic Generation Spectra. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3743 (1998)

    1998

  69. [76]

    Shafir, Y

    D. Shafir, Y. Mairesse, D. M. Villeneuve, P. B. Corkum, N. Dudovich, Atomic wavefunctions probed through strong-field light–matter interaction. Nat. Phys. 5, 412–416 (2009)

    2009

  70. [77]

    Zhang, et al., Laser-sub-cycle two-dimensional electron-momentum mapping using orthogonal two - color fields

    L. Zhang, et al., Laser-sub-cycle two-dimensional electron-momentum mapping using orthogonal two - color fields. Phys. Rev. A 90, 61401 (2014)

    2014

  71. [78]

    Stremoukhov, et al., Origin of ellipticity of high -order harmonics generated by a two -color laser field in the cross-polarized configuration

    S. Stremoukhov, et al., Origin of ellipticity of high -order harmonics generated by a two -color laser field in the cross-polarized configuration. Phys. Rev. A 94, 013855 (2016)

    2016

  72. [80]

    D. B. Milo šević, W. Becker, R. Kopold, S. W., High -harmonic generation by a bichromatic bicircular laser field. Laser Phys. 11, 165–168 (2001)

    2001

  73. [81]

    Fleischer, O

    A. Fleischer, O. Kfir, T. Diskin, P. Sidorenko, O. Cohen, Spin angular momentum and tunable polarization in high-harmonic generation. Nat. Photonics 8, 543–549 (2014)

    2014

  74. [82]

    Kfir, et al

    O. Kfir, et al. , Generation of bright phase -matched circularly -polarized extreme ultraviolet high harmonics. Nat. Photonics 9, 99–105 (2015)

    2015

  75. [83]

    X.-M. Tong, S. -I. Chu, Generation of circularly polarized multiple high -order harmonic emission from two-color crossed laser beams. Phys. Rev. A 58, 2656(R) (1998)

    1998

  76. [84]

    Neufeld, O

    O. Neufeld, O. Cohen, Background -Free Measurement of Ring Currents by Symmetry -Breaking High- Harmonic Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 103202 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.