Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Macdonald deformation of Vogel's universality and link hyperpolynomials

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that, in the ADE series, products of Macdonald-deformed Littlewood-Richardson coefficients with Macdonald dimensions are universal in the adjoint square, and writes universal Hopf-link and T[2,2n] hyperpolynomials from…

desk verdict Plausible, genuinely new universal adjoint-square decomposition for Macdonald theory, with the load-bearing PAdj term left as an unexhibited remainder — worth refereeing despite the 'fully proved' overstatement. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.16569 v2 pith:AFEAIVXM submitted 2025-05-22 hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.QA

Liudmila Bishler , Andrei Mironov , Alexei Morozov This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.QA
keywords Vogel'suniversalityMacdonalddimensionsLittlewood-RichardsoncoefficientshyperpolynomialsHopflinktoruslinksT[22n]ADErootsystemsrefinedChern-Simonstheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Vogel's universality packages the adjoint-sector representation theory of simple Lie algebras into formulas depending only on three plane coordinates a, b, c. This paper asks what survives when quantum dimensions are replaced by their Macdonald (q,t)-deformed versions, as they must be in refined Chern-Simons theory and knot hyperpolynomials. The claim is that the universal objects are not the deformed dimensions themselves but their products with the deformed Littlewood-Richardson coefficients, and the paper proves this for the square of the adjoint representation, decomposed into six 'universally irreducible' pieces, across the simply laced ADE series. From that proof it writes explicit universal hyperpolynomials for the Hopf link and for all 2-strand torus links T[2,2n] colored by the adjoint representation. A sympathetic reader should care because universality is what lets a single q,t formula describe link invariants for infinitely many gauge groups.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the universal decomposition (25)-(26), written with $\xi(x)=\{x\}/\{qx/t\}$ and variables $u=q^a$, $v=t^b$, $w=t^c$, $T=(q^2/t^2)uvw$. The three $Y_2$ terms are obtained from one another by permuting $u,v,w$, while $X_2$ and $P_\emptyset$ are symmetric, and the six entries are the 'uirreps', combinations of ordinary irreps that cannot be distinguished on the Vogel plane. The decomposition is derived by evaluating the Macdonald product rule at the refined Weyl-vector point $x=q^{2\rho_k}$, where the factorization formula (19) turns Macdonald polynomials into factorized Macdonald dimensions. The refined framing factors $f_\Lambda=q^{(\Lambda,\Lambda)/2+(\Lambda,\rho_k)}$ carry the powers needed to evolve the Hopf link into the $T[2,2n]$ series, and the fact that the undeformed adjoint-square pattern (9) survives $q,t$-deformation supplies the list of uirreps.

What would settle it

Evaluate, for $D_6$, the product $C^{Y_2(b)}_{\mathrm{Adj},\mathrm{Adj}}\,\mathrm{Md}_{Y_2(b)}$ directly from the Macdonald decomposition (16) and compare it with the universal expression $Y_2(a)|_{u\leftrightarrow v}$ from (26), using the Vogel parameters of $D_6$; a single generic pair $(q,t)$ where they disagree falsifies the main claim and invalidates the Hopf formula (50).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the ADE series, the paper proves that the square of the adjoint Macdonald dimension decomposes as $$(\mathrm{Md}_{\mathrm{Adj}})^2 = X_2 + Y_2(a)+Y_2(b)+Y_2(c)+P_{\mathrm{Adj}}+P_\emptyset,$$ where each of the six terms is the product of a $(q,t)$-deformed Littlewood-Richardson coefficient and a Macdonald dimension, and each product is a universal function of $u=q^a$, $v=t^b$, $w=t^c$, and $T=(q^2/t^2)uvw$, symmetric under permutations of $u,v,w$. The explicit formulas in (26) match the direct Macdonald computations for the $A_n$, $D_n$ ($n\ge5$), and $E_6,E_7,E_8$ series, which the paper states as a complete proof of its main claim for $\mu=\nu=\mathrm{Adj}$. From this decomposition it derives the universal Hopf-link hyperpolynomial (50) and the torus-link hyperpolynomials $T[2,2n]$ (52), by raising the refined framing factors $f_\Lambda$ to the required powers. The structural point is that universality attaches to the product $C^\lambda_{\mathrm{Adj},\mathrm{Adj}}\,\mathrm{Md}_\lambda$, not to either factor alone; the adjoint term $P_{\mathrm{Adj}}$ is the remainder after the other universal terms are subtracted and is not independently established.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the six-term decomposition of the adjoint square and the universality of the five explicit terms are complete for every ADE algebra, so that the leftover adjoint term $P_{\mathrm{Adj}}$ and the Hopf and torus-link hyperpolynomials built from it can be declared universal by subtraction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Hopf link hyperpolynomial colored by the adjoint representation is fixed by a single formula (50) valid for all ADE algebras, not a separate computation for each gauge group.
  • The same universality extends to all 2-strand torus links $T[2,2n]$ by replacing $f_\Lambda^{-2}$ with $f_\Lambda^{-2n}$ in (52); at $n=0$ the formula reduces to the square of the adjoint Macdonald dimension, which is the consistency check.
  • The claim implies that Macdonald dimensions alone are not universal; the universal quantity is always the product with the corresponding deformed Littlewood-Richardson coefficient, exactly the combination appearing in refined Chern-Simons invariants.
  • Universality is restricted to the simply laced ADE algebras; attempts at other Dynkin diagrams fail at the level of Macdonald dimensions.
  • For knots, the $T[2,2n+1]$ series, the same method does not yet settle universality because the required $\gamma$-factors have not been shown to be universal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable consequence the paper leaves implicit: setting $t=q$ in (50) should reproduce the known universal HOMFLY Hopf invariant for the adjoint representation, and running that check on $E_6$ would independently confirm the subtracted term $P_{\mathrm{Adj}}$.
  • The subtraction method for $P_{\mathrm{Adj}}$ suggests a strategy for higher uirreps such as the antisymmetric cube $X_3$: if all explicit terms are universal, the remainder may be fixed by consistency at $n=0$ and the trivial-link limit, potentially avoiding the direct computation of complicated Littlewood-Richardson coefficients.
  • Since $Y_2(c)$ must vanish for the $A$-series and the exceptional algebras, the 'six uirreps' are not six representations in every algebra; whether this selection rule is governed by the $u,v,w$ symmetry alone could determine how far the conjecture extends beyond the simply laced case.
  • The average identity (56), where an average of two ordinary non-universal Macdonald polynomials produces a universal object in the adjoint case, hints at a general projection mechanism from non-universal representation theory to Vogel universality.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Macdonald (q,t) deformation of Vogel's universality for ADE Lie algebras. Its central conjecture is that universality holds not for Macdonald dimensions Md_λ themselves, but for the products C^λ_{μν}·Md_λ of Macdonald-deformed Littlewood-Richardson coefficients with Macdonald dimensions. For the square of the adjoint representation, the paper writes a six-uirrep decomposition (25)-(26), verifies it explicitly for the A and D series in Eqs. (14), (16), (20), (21), and asserts an exact match for E6, E7, E8 via the unified formulas (40). It then derives universal Taki factors and uses them to propose universal hyperpolynomials for the Hopf link and torus links T[2,2n], Eqs. (50) and (52), and discusses unresolved issues for torus knots.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper gives a concrete and checkable q,t-refinement of Vogel's universality and connects it to refined Chern-Simons theory and hyperpolynomials. The explicit A- and D-series formulas and the universal decomposition (25)-(26) are strong, falsifiable results, and the proposed universal Hopf and torus-link formulas are interesting outputs. However, the E-series verification is presented only as an assertion, and the crucial quantity P_Adj is never exhibited explicitly; both points are load-bearing for the claim that the main conjecture is fully proved for all ADE algebras. These issues are addressable, but the present version is not yet fully convincing.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.4] The sentence after Eq. (40) that 'there is an exact match' is the whole E-series verification, but the computation is not shown. To establish (26) for E6, E7 and E8 one must substitute the s-dependent variables (39) into (40) and check that the right-hand side of (25)-(26), including the unexhibited P_Adj, reproduces (Md^E_Adj)^2 and the individual terms X2, Y2(a), Y2(b) and P_∅ for each exceptional algebra. This is a nontrivial rational-function identity in q and t, and it is load-bearing for the claim in the Introduction and §4.4 that the main claim is 'fully proved for all ADE algebras'. Please display this check explicitly, or supply a reproducible computation, and state precisely which identities are being compared.
  2. [§3, Eqs. (25)-(26); §6] The quantity P_Adj is never written explicitly: it is defined only as the remainder after subtracting X2, Y2(a), Y2(b), Y2(c) and P_∅ from (Md_Adj)^2. As the authors correctly note in the concluding section, its universality 'follows only from the fact that all other terms at both sides of (25) are universal.' That inference is valid only if the decomposition (9) is complete and every explicit term is universal for q≠t; a discrepancy that vanishes at t=q would be invisible in the classical limit but would propagate into P_Adj and hence into the Hopf hyperpolynomial (50). Since Eq. (50) is one of the two main outputs, P_Adj needs an independent derivation or an explicit closed form, not only a subtraction argument.
  3. [§2.1-2.2 and Introduction] The verification is carried out for A_N with N≥4 and D_n with n≥5, but the conclusion claims all ADE algebras. The low-rank cases A_1, A_2 and D_4 are not treated, and in these cases some of the Young-diagram identifications used in (10) and (15) degenerate or acquire extra symmetries. Either extend the check to these algebras or state explicitly that the universal formulas are verified for generic rank and then list which remaining ADE cases are covered by direct inspection.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.2] The sentence about the A-series value of f_{Y2(c)} is hard to parse: since Y2(c) is absent for the A series, please clarify whether the displayed ratio f_{Y2(c)}=(q/t)f_Adj is a hypothetical value and explain in what sense its non-coincidence with f_Adj would break universality.
  2. [§5.4, Eq. (56)] The two displayed formulas in (56) have the same right-hand side, but the following text says that the right-hand side should involve the mirror-reflected Hopf hyperpolynomial with (q,t) replaced by (q^{-1},t^{-1}); please correct the notation so that the two cases are distinguished.
  3. [References] Reference [21] combines two different papers in one entry: the published paper by Bishler and Mironov and a separate manuscript 'Vogel's universality and Macdonald dimensions' described as being prepared. Please separate these and give the second item a stable identifier if one exists.
  4. [Eq. (13)] Equation (13) appears to contain the partition [332^{N-4}11], whereas the surrounding decomposition (10)-(12) and Eq. (14) use [332^{N-4}12]=[221^{N-4}]; please check whether this is a typographical error.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the universal decomposition is checked against independent A/D/E Macdonald data; PAdj is a derived remainder, not a fitted input.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the products C^lambda_Adj,Adj * Md_lambda are universal for the six uirreps in the adjoint square. The evidence for A and D series comes from explicit Macdonald polynomial identities, equations (14) and (16), and the E-series check is a comparison of the listed Macdonald dimensions, equations (30), (34), (38), and the unified formulas (40), against the proposed universal expressions (26). This is an external consistency check against independent Macdonald-dimension computations, not a fit of parameters to the same data that is later called a prediction. The term PAdj is indeed defined as the remainder after subtracting the other universal terms in (25), and the paper explicitly states in Section 6 that its universality 'follows only from the fact that all other terms at both sides of (25) are universal.' This is a valid logical inference: if the left side and all explicit terms are universal functions of u, v, w, then their difference is also universal. It is not circular, although it does mean that the E-series match does not independently test PAdj. The Hopf hyperpolynomial (50) and the torus-link formula (52) are obtained by inserting the universal decomposition into the standard Rosso-Jones/evolution structure; they are consequences of the decomposition rather than predictions fitted to the same data. The cited prior work [21], by overlapping authors, supplies the Macdonald-dimension framework, but the present verification rests on explicit Macdonald polynomial identities and Cherednik's factorization theorem, so the self-citation is not the sole load-bearing support. The E-series match is asserted rather than displayed, which is a reproducibility and verification concern, not a circularity. No circular step of the enumerated kinds is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central formulas rest on standard Macdonald theory plus a domain restriction to ADE. No free parameters are fitted; the universality of PAdj is a remainder and thus a structural assumption rather than an independent derivation.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Macdonald polynomials factorize at the refined Weyl vector (Eq. 19), giving closed formulas for Macdonald dimensions.
    Used to write all explicit Md formulas (20), (21), (30), (34), (38); cited to Macdonald and Cherednik.
  • domain assumption The Macdonald Littlewood-Richardson coefficients N^lambda_mu_nu vanish exactly when the classical coefficients vanish, preserving representation product structure (Eq. 3).
    This is the basis for interpreting (3) as a deformation of (2); stated in the introduction without proof.
  • domain assumption Universality is assumed to hold only in the simply laced (ADE) case; Macdonald deformation for other Dynkin diagrams is known to be problematic.
    Restricts the whole paper to ADE; the authors cite known obstacles for B,C,F,G.
  • domain assumption The refined Rosso-Jones formula (42) and framing factors (45)-(46) give the correct Hopf hyperpolynomial for all ADE algebras.
    Used to derive the universal Hopf hyperpolynomial (50); not re-derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption For torus links T[2,2n], the evolution method reduces to raising framing factors to powers (Eq. 52).
    This converts the n=1 Hopf result into the full T[2,2n] family; no independent proof is given.
  • domain assumption The CMM integral identity (56) computes the Hopf hyperpolynomial from an average of two Macdonald polynomials.
    Invoked to illustrate universality of the r.h.s.; cited from [57].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Macdonald deformation of Vogel's universality and link hyperpolynomials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AFEAIVXM

@misc{pith2026250516569,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Macdonald deformation of Vogel's universality and link hyperpolynomials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AFEAIVXM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.16569}
}
abstract

Vogel's universality implies a unified description of the adjoint sector of representation theory for simple Lie algebras in terms of three parameters $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$, which are homogeneous coordinates of Vogel's plane. Actually this is true (if at all) only for a piece of representation theory captured by knot/Chern-Simons theory, where some irreducible representations are often undistinguishable and combined into new ``universally-irreducible" entities (uirreps). We consider from this point of view the recently discovered Macdonald deformation of quantum dimensions, for which a kind of universality holds for the ADE series. The claim is that universal are not Macdonald dimensions themselves, but their products with Littlewood-Richardson coefficients, which themselves are functions of $q$ and $t$ in Macdonald theory. These products are precisely what arises in knot/refined Chern-Simons theory. Actually, we consider the simplest decomposition of adjoint square into six uirreps and obtain the universal formulas for hyperpolynomials of the Hopf link and, more generally, of the torus links $T[2,2n]$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Torus knots in adjoint representation and Vogel's universality

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Universal adjoint invariants for T[4,n] torus knots are constructed via Vogel's universality, completing the T[4,n] case after previous T[2,n] and T[3,n] results.

  2. Vogel's universality and Macdonald dimensions

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper gives a single rational formula for adjoint Macdonald dimensions that unifies the simply laced Lie algebras A_n, D_n, E6, E7, E8, plus explicit mixed-root-system dimension formulas.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [21]

    Bishler, A

    L. Bishler, A. Mironov, Phys.Lett. B867 (2025) 139596, arXiv:2504.13831 L. Bishler, Vogel’s universality and Macdonald dimensions , being prepared for publication

    arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    Vogel, Algebraic structures on modules of diagrams , Preprint (1995), available at https://webusers

    P. Vogel, Algebraic structures on modules of diagrams , Preprint (1995), available at https://webusers. imj-prg.fr/~pierre.vogel/diagrams.pdf, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 215 (2011) 1292-1339

    1995

  3. [2]

    Vogel, The Universal Lie algebra , Preprint (1999), available at https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/ ~pierre.vogel/grenoble-99b.pdf 13

    P. Vogel, The Universal Lie algebra , Preprint (1999), available at https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/ ~pierre.vogel/grenoble-99b.pdf 13

    work page 1999

  4. [3]

    Khudoteplov, E

    D. Khudoteplov, E. Lanina, A. Sleptsov, Construction of Lie algebra weight system kernel via Vogel algebra, arXiv:2411.14417

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    Khudoteplov, A

    D. Khudoteplov, A. Morozov, A. Sleptsov, Can Yang-Baxter imply Lie algebra? , arXiv:2503.13437

    arXiv

  6. [5]

    Aganagic, S

    M. Aganagic, S. Shakirov, Commun. Math. Phys. 333 (2015) 187-228, arXiv:1105.5117

    arXiv 2015

  7. [6]

    Aganagic, S

    M. Aganagic, S. Shakirov, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 85 (2012) 3-32, arXiv:1202.2489

    arXiv 2012

  8. [7]

    Avetisyan, R.L

    M.Y. Avetisyan, R.L. Mkrtchyan, JHEP 10 (2021) 033, arXiv:2107.08679

    arXiv 2021

Show all 57 references
  1. [8]

    Mkrtchyan, Phys

    R.L. Mkrtchyan, Phys. Lett. b808 (2020) 135692, arXiv:2007.09346

    2020 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Avetisyan, R.L

    M.Y. Avetisyan, R.L. Mkrtchyan, JHEP 2022 (2022) 97, arXiv:2205.12832

    2022 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Avetisyan, Vogel’s Universality and its Applications , arXiv:2207.04302

    M. Avetisyan, Vogel’s Universality and its Applications , arXiv:2207.04302

    arXiv

  4. [11]

    Avetisyan, R.L

    M.Y. Avetisyan, R.L. Mkrtchyan, J. Geom. Phys. 191 (2023) 104907, arXiv:2302.14319

    2023 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Avetisyan, R.L

    M.Y. Avetisyan, R.L. Mkrtchyan, Phys. Part. Nucl. 54 (2023) 1059-1062, arXiv:2304.05184

    2023 arXiv

  6. [13]

    P.Dunin-Barkowski, A.Mironov, A.Morozov, A.Sleptsov, A.Smirnov, JHEP 03 (2013) 021, arXiv:1106.4305

    2013 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Cherednik, Jones polynomials of torus knots via DAHA , arXiv:1111.6195

    I. Cherednik, Jones polynomials of torus knots via DAHA , arXiv:1111.6195

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    Dunfield, S

    N.M. Dunfield, S. Gukov, J. Rasmussen, Experimental Math. 15 (2006) 129-159, math/0505662

    2006 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Khovanov, Duke Math

    M. Khovanov, Duke Math. J. 101 (2000) 359-426

    2000

  10. [17]

    Bar-Natan, Algebr

    D. Bar-Natan, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 2 (2002) 337-370, math/0201043

    2002 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Carqueville, D

    N. Carqueville, D. Murfet, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 14 (2014) 489-537, arXiv:1108.1081

    2014 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Khovanov, L

    M. Khovanov, L. Rozansky, math.QA/0401268; Geom. Topol. 12 (2008) 1387-1425, math.QA/0505056

    2008

  13. [20]

    Dolotin, A

    V. Dolotin, A. Morozov, Nucl. Phys. B878 (2014) 12-81, arXiv:1308.5759

    2014 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Krefl, A

    D. Krefl, A. Schwarz, Journal of Geometry and Physics, 74 (2013) 119-129, arXiv:1304.7873

    2013 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Mkrtchyan, A.P

    R.L. Mkrtchyan, A.P. Veselov, JHEP 08 (2012) 153, arXiv:1203.0766

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Mkrtchyan, JHEP 09 (2013) 54, arXiv:1302.1507

    R.L. Mkrtchyan, JHEP 09 (2013) 54, arXiv:1302.1507

    2013 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Krefl, R

    D. Krefl, R. Mkrtchyan, JHEP 10 (2015) 45, arXiv:1506.03907

    2015 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Mkrtchyan, J

    R.L. Mkrtchyan, J. Geom. Phys. 129 (2018) 186-191, arXiv:1709.03261

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Westbury, Proceedings of the Tenth Oporto Meeting on Geometry, Topology and Physics, 18 (2001) suppl

    B. Westbury, Proceedings of the Tenth Oporto Meeting on Geometry, Topology and Physics, 18 (2001) suppl. 2003, pp. 49-82

    2001

  20. [28]

    Mkrtchyan, Nucl

    R.L. Mkrtchyan, Nucl. Phys. B921 (2017) 236-249, arXiv:1610.09910

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Landsberg, L

    J.M. Landsberg, L. Manivel, Adv. Math. 201 (2006) 379-407

    2006

  22. [30]

    Mkrtchyan, A.N

    R.L. Mkrtchyan, A.N. Sergeev, A.P. Veselov, J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012) 102106, arXiv:1105.0115

    2012 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Avetisyan, A.P

    M.Y. Avetisyan, A.P. Isaev, S.O. Krivonos, R.L. Mkrtchyan, Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics, 31 (2024) 379-388, arXiv:2311.05358

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Isaev, A.A

    A.P. Isaev, A.A. Provorov, Theor.Math.Phys. 206 (2021) 3-22, arXiv:2012.00746

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Isaev, S.O

    A.P. Isaev, S.O. Krivonos, J. Math. Phys. 62 (2021) 083503, arXiv:2102.08258

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Isaev, S.O

    A.P. Isaev, S.O. Krivonos, A.A. Provorov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A38 (2023) 235003, arXiv:2212.14761

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Khudaverdian, R.L

    H.M. Khudaverdian, R.L. Mkrtchyan, Lett. Math. Phys. 107 (2017) 1491-1514, arXiv:1602.00337

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Mironov, R

    A. Mironov, R. Mkrtchyan, A. Morozov, JHEP 02 (2016) 078, arXiv:1510.05884 14

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Mironov, A

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, Phys. Lett. B755 (2016) 47-57, arXiv:1511.09077

    2016 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Anokhina, A

    A. Anokhina, A. Morozov, JHEP 07 (2014) 063, arXiv:1403.8087

    2014 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Macdonald, S` eminaire Lotharingien Combin.45 (2000), Article B45a, 40 pp, arXiv:math/0011046

    I.G. Macdonald, S` eminaire Lotharingien Combin.45 (2000), Article B45a, 40 pp, arXiv:math/0011046

    2000 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Macdonald, SIAM J.Math

    I.G. Macdonald, SIAM J.Math. Anal. 13:6 (1982) 988-1007

    1982

  33. [41]

    Cherednik, Inventiones mathematicae, 125 (1996) 391, q-alg/9412016

    I. Cherednik, Inventiones mathematicae, 125 (1996) 391, q-alg/9412016

    1996 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Cherednik, The Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, 141 (1995) 191-216

    I. Cherednik, The Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, 141 (1995) 191-216

    1995

  35. [43]

    Koornwinder, in: Hypergeometric Functions on Domains of Positivity, Jack Polynomials, and Appli- cations (Tampa, FL, 1991), Contemp

    T.H. Koornwinder, in: Hypergeometric Functions on Domains of Positivity, Jack Polynomials, and Appli- cations (Tampa, FL, 1991), Contemp. Math. 138, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1992, 189-204

    1991

  36. [44]

    Iqbal, C

    A. Iqbal, C. Kozcaz, JHEP 04 (2012) 046, arXiv:1111.0525

    2012 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Awata, H

    H. Awata, H. Kanno, A. Mironov, A. Morozov, Nucl. Phys. B949 (2019) 114816, arXiv:1905.00208

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Rosso, V.F.R

    M. Rosso, V.F.R. Jones, J. Knot Theory Ramifications, 2 (1993) 97-112

    1993

  39. [47]

    X.-S. Lin, H. Zheng, Trans.Amer.Math.Soc. 362 (2010) 1-18, math/0601267

    2010 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Taki, JHEP 0803 (2008) 048, arXiv:0710.1776; arXiv:0805.0336

    M. Taki, JHEP 0803 (2008) 048, arXiv:0710.1776; arXiv:0805.0336

    2008 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Mironov, A

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, A. Morozov, AIP Conf. Proc. 1562 (2013) 123-155, arXiv:1306.3197

    2013 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Cherednik, R

    I. Cherednik, R. Elliot, Refined composite invariants of torus knots via DAHA , arXiv:1503.01441

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    H.Awata, H.Kanno, A.Mironov, A.Morozov, A.Morozov, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 046018, arXiv:1806.01146

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Bouchard, B

    V. Bouchard, B. Florea and M. Marino, JHEP 02 (2005) 002, arXiv:hep-th/0411227

    2005 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Mironov and A

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov, Nucl. Phys. B960 (2020) 115191, arXiv:2003.07836

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Cherednik, Internat.Math.Res.Notices, 1997 (10) (1997) 449-467, q-alg/9702022

    I. Cherednik, Internat.Math.Res.Notices, 1997 (10) (1997) 449-467, q-alg/9702022

    1997 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Etingof, A

    P. Etingof, A. Kirillov, Electr.Res.Announc.Amer.Math.Soc. 4 (1998) 43-47, q-alg/9712051

    1998 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Chalykh, P

    O. Chalykh, P. Etingof, Advances in Mathematics, 238 (2013) 246-289, arXiv:1111.0515

    2013 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Mironov, A

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, A. Popolitov, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 126026, arXiv:2410.03175 15

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.