Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 5 cited by

Qiskit Machine Learning: an open-source library for quantum machine learning tasks at scale on quantum hardware and classical simulators

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper presents Qiskit Machine Learning, an open-source library that packages quantum kernels and variational circuits into a scikit-learn-style Python API for running quantum machine learning on simulators and real hardware.

desk verdict A clear, honest software description of a real open-source QML library, but the title's 'at scale' claim outruns the evidence in the paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.17756 v1 pith:2HW3R4DY submitted 2025-05-23 quant-ph cs.ETcs.LGphysics.comp-ph

M. Emre Sahin , Edoardo Altamura , Oscar Wallis , Stephen P. Wood , Anton Dekusar , Declan A. Millar , Takashi Imamichi , Atsushi Matsuo
show 1 more author
Stefano Mensa
This is my paper
classification quant-phcs.ETcs.LGphysics.comp-ph
keywords quantummachinelearningQiskitkernelsvariationalcircuitshybridquantum-classicalmodelsneuralnetworksopen-sourcelibrary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents Qiskit Machine Learning, a high-level Python library that bridges quantum computing and classical machine learning. The authors' claim is that the library wraps Qiskit's low-level primitives into ready-made models—quantum kernels for support vector machines, variational quantum classifiers and regressors, and quantum neural networks—so that both specialists and non-specialists can run QML on simulators and on real quantum hardware through a familiar Python interface. The significance is that it lowers the barrier to experimenting with quantum-enhanced machine learning and gives the field a common, modular toolset.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Qiskit primitive abstraction: the Sampler, which returns bitstring probabilities, and the Estimator, which returns expectation values, with the QuantumCircuit and observable inputs. On top of these sit two mathematical identities: the fidelity kernel $K(x,x') = |\langle \phi(x)|\phi(x')\rangle|^2$, which maps classical data into a quantum feature space, and the parameter-shift rule $\partial f(\theta)/\partial \theta_i = (f(\theta_i+s)-f(\theta_i-s))/(2\sin(s))$, which turns gradient computation into two circuit evaluations. Together these carry the kernel matrix construction and the gradient-based training of the variational models.

What would settle it

Install the library, build an EstimatorQNN on a one-qubit circuit with a known observable, and compare its output with the analytically exact expectation value; if the mismatch exceeds the documented tolerance, the claim that the components reliably compute on simulators fails. A second check would be to run the library's published VQC tutorial on a fixed dataset and compare the achieved accuracy to the value stated in the documentation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the authors' telling, Qiskit ML is an open-source module that sits at the application layer of the Qiskit ecosystem and provides a unified interface for training and evaluating quantum machine learning models. The core components are the EstimatorQNN and SamplerQNN neural-network classes, the FidelityQuantumKernel and TrainableFidelityQuantumKernel for SVM-style methods, the variational VQC and VQR algorithms, and gradient routines such as the parameter-shift rule and SPSA. The library is designed so that the same high-level code runs on Aer simulators or on IBM quantum hardware through the Sampler and Estimator primitives, and it connects to scikit-learn and PyTorch for hybrid workflows.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the advertised components—the QNNs, the quantum kernels, and the variational algorithms—actually run correctly and reliably on both real quantum hardware and simulators, a premise the paper asserts in prose but does not back with tests, benchmarks, or error analysis.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Users can switch between a classical simulator, a noisy hardware-emulation backend, and real IBM devices without rewriting model logic, because the primitive layer standardizes execution.
  • A scikit-learn user can run a quantum support vector classifier with the same fit/predict interface they already use, and a PyTorch user can embed quantum layers into hybrid models.
  • The parameter-shift rule and SPSA give deterministic and stochastic gradient options, allowing the same variational circuit to be trained on noiseless and noisy settings.
  • The modular class structure makes it straightforward to extend the library with new kernels, feature maps, or optimizers, which the authors expect to support research on early fault-tolerant hardware.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to benchmark the same QML task (e.g., classification accuracy and wall-clock time) through Qiskit ML on a simulator, a noise-emulated backend, and a real device; the paper itself provides no such benchmark, so the abstraction's practical overhead and robustness remain unverified.
  • The 'at scale' claim in the title is supported only by a cited external study on 156 qubits; if that result cannot be reproduced through the library's current API, the scale claim would need to be narrowed.
  • The library's long-term value depends on whether the primitive abstraction stays stable across Qiskit releases; a breaking change in the primitives would propagate to every high-level model the library exposes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents Qiskit Machine Learning (Qiskit ML), an open-source Python library for quantum machine learning, as a high-level interface over Qiskit primitives. It describes the library's design structure (Section II), including quantum neural networks (EstimatorQNN, SamplerQNN), variational classifiers/regressors (VQC, VQR), fidelity quantum kernels, quantum support vector machines, and Bayesian inference; reports standard QML formulas for parameter-shift gradients, kernel construction, and variational loss minimization; surveys external works that used Qiskit ML (Section III); and concludes with outlook and code-availability statements. The paper contains no experiments, benchmarks, error analyses, or end-to-end usage examples.

Significance. If the library indeed functions as described, it is a potentially valuable community resource that lowers the barrier to QML experimentation, integrates with scikit-learn and PyTorch, and provides access to IBM quantum hardware through Qiskit Runtime. The manuscript is honest in being descriptive rather than claiming new algorithmic results, and the cited equations are standard and correct. The open-source availability, Apache-2.0 license, and substantial list of contributors are strengths. However, as a standalone scientific contribution, the significance is limited by the absence of any validation: the title's 'at scale' claim and the abstract's implied reliability of the listed components are not evidenced within the manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Table I, and title] The central claim that Qiskit ML's components (EstimatorQNN, SamplerQNN, FidelityQuantumKernel, VQC, VQR, QBayesianInference) work reliably on simulators and IBM hardware at scale rests entirely on architecture descriptions and external citations. The manuscript provides no smoke test, no benchmark table, no timing or qubit-count data, no error bars, and no end-to-end example for any component. External applications cited in Section III (e.g., [37]) show that prior versions or related routines were used elsewhere, but they do not verify the current API described here. This is a missing-evidence gap rather than an internal inconsistency, but it is load-bearing for the paper's central claim.
  2. [Section III and Ref. [37]] The only concrete 'at scale' evidence in the manuscript is an external study on 156 qubits, which the present paper neither reproduces nor ties to a specific version or commit. Within the manuscript there is no demonstration of scaling on simulators or hardware, no discussion of the conditions under which the advertised routines scale, and no acknowledgment of known limitations such as exponential concentration that [37] must mitigate. Either add a validation section with actual scale experiments or qualify the title and abstract to avoid claiming demonstrated scale.
  3. [Section V and Section II] For a software library paper, the lack of a pinned release version, dependency versions, installation instructions, and a minimal working example makes the claimed 'modular, intuitive tool' not independently checkable from the manuscript. A concise reproducible example (e.g., a short script that trains a VQC on a toy dataset and reports its accuracy) would substantially strengthen the paper and would also let readers confirm the current API matches the description.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section I] There is a typo in the second paragraph: 'thereisagrowingneed' should read 'there is a growing need'.
  2. [Section II] The heading 'V ariational Quantum Algorithms' contains a stray space; also 'VQC/R' in Table I is nonstandard and should be expanded.
  3. [Section II.A] Equation (1) is correct, but the parameter-shift rule's condition on the shift s (nonzero, and the generator's eigenvalue spectrum) is not stated; a brief clarifying sentence would help non-specialist readers.
  4. [Section II.C] The optimizer 'NFT' is never expanded; spell it out as Nakanishi-Fujii-Todo or add a reference citation at first use.
  5. [Figure 1] The UML diagram uses arrows and symbols (e.g., the ⇡ notation) without a legend; a short caption explaining the notation would improve readability.
  6. [Section III] There are minor grammatical issues, e.g., 'Zoufal et al. [21] demonstrates' and 'Santi et al. [25] introduced' mix singular and plural verb forms; these should be harmonized.
  7. [General] The manuscript does not state supported Python or Qiskit versions; a short compatibility statement would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a descriptive software-library overview with no derivation chain; the self-citations in the literature survey are not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a descriptive software and ecosystem paper, not a derivation. Equations (1)-(3) are standard textbook formulas cited to external literature, and the design structure in Section II is architectural description; no quantity is fitted and then re-predicted, and no component is defined in terms of the claim it is supposed to support. The title's 'at scale' claim is supported by external literature in Section III, including [37]; although [37] shares an author with the present work and several cited items are IBM-affiliated, those citations report independent experiments (e.g., 156-qubit hardware runs) and are not used to define or derive the library's content. No self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, or uniqueness-imported-from-authors pattern appears. Concerns about the absence of benchmarks or standalone tests in the manuscript are an evidence/verification gap, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper makes no parameter fits and introduces no new entities. Its claims rest on the correct functioning of Qiskit primitives, standard classical ML libraries, and standard quantum mechanical results.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Qiskit primitives (Sampler, Estimator) return the documented probabilities and expectation values.
    The entire library design in Section II builds on these primitives, but no validation is given in this paper.
  • standard math The parameter-shift rule (Eq. 1) computes exact analytic gradients as claimed in [6].
    Standard result from the literature, cited as background for the library's gradient estimation.
  • domain assumption Classical software dependencies (NumPy, scikit-learn, PyTorch, SciPy) behave as documented.
    Relied on for the integration and workflows described in Sections I and II.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Qiskit Machine Learning: an open-source library for quantum machine learning tasks at scale on quantum hardware and classical simulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2HW3R4DY

@misc{pith2026250517756,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Qiskit Machine Learning: an open-source library for quantum machine learning tasks at scale on quantum hardware and classical simulators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2HW3R4DY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.17756}
}
read the original abstract

We present Qiskit Machine Learning (ML), a high-level Python library that combines elements of quantum computing with traditional machine learning. The API abstracts Qiskit's primitives to facilitate interactions with classical simulators and quantum hardware. Qiskit ML started as a proof-of-concept code in 2019 and has since been developed to be a modular, intuitive tool for non-specialist users while allowing extensibility and fine-tuning controls for quantum computational scientists and developers. The library is available as a public, open-source tool and is distributed under the Apache version 2.0 license.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. First-Principles Optical Descriptors and Hybrid Classical-Quantum Classification of Er-Doped CaF$_2$

    quant-ph 2026-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Classical and quantum classifiers label energy points from the TDDFT absorption spectra of pure vs Er-doped CaF2, with classical SVM at 0.983 test accuracy, but the benchmark uses only two spectra and is therefore not...

  2. Quantum Machine Learning Applied to the Sinking of the Titanic

    quant-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A benchmark of Qiskit variational classifiers on titanic3 finds the non-entangling ZFeatureMap outperforms the entangling ZZFeatureMap, but the reported SVC collapse is likely due to a small test set.

  3. Quantum Neural Networks for Wind Energy Forecasting: A Comparative Study of Performance and Scalability with Classical Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On one wind turbine dataset, simulated 4-qubit quantum neural networks with a Z feature map reach R2 around 0.94 and RMSE slightly below k-nearest neighbors, with training time scaling roughly linearly with dataset size.

  4. Comparative Analysis of QNN Architectures for Wind Power Prediction: Feature Maps and Ansatz Configurations

    quant-ph 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Z feature map quantum neural networks reach R^2 0.92-0.93 for wind power prediction in simulation, but the paper's claim that they outperform classical methods is contradicted by its MAE results.

  5. Towards quantum machine learning for assessing the resilience of post-quantum cryptography

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A 16-qubit QGAN can approximate the first-byte distribution of SPHINCS+ signatures in simulation, but the result is a small-scale, unbenchmarked demonstration with no attack.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [37]

    Miti- gating exponential concentration in covariant quantum kernels for subspace and real-world data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07915, 2024

    Gabriele Agliardi, Giorgio Cortiana, Anton Dekusar, Kumar Ghosh, Naeimeh Mohseni, Corey O’Meara, Víc- tor Valls, Kavitha Yogaraj, and Sergiy Zhuk. Miti- gating exponential concentration in covariant quantum kernels for subspace and real-world data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07915, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Wood, Jake Lishman, Julien Gacon, Simon Martiel, Paul D

    Ali Javadi-Abhari, Matthew Treinish, Kevin Krsulich, Christopher J. Wood, Jake Lishman, Julien Gacon, Simon Martiel, Paul D. Nation, Lev S. Bishop, An- drew W. Cross, Blake R. Johnson, and Jay M. Gam- betta. Quantum computing with Qiskit, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [2]

    Harris, K

    Charles R. Harris, K. Jarrod Millman, Stéfan J. van der Walt, Ralf Gommers, Pauli Virtanen, David Cour- napeau, Eric Wieser, Julian Taylor, Sebastian Berg, Nathaniel J. Smith, Robert Kern, Matti Picus, Stephan Hoyer, Marten H. van Kerkwijk, Matthew Brett, Al- lan Haldane, Jaime Fernández del Río, Mark Wiebe, Pearu Peterson, Pierre Gérard-Marchant, Kevin S...

    2020

  4. [3]

    Pedregosa, G

    F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duches- nay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825–2830, 2011

    2011

  5. [4]

    Au- tomatic differentiation in pytorch

    Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Soumith Chintala, Gregory Chanan, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Zeming Lin, Alban Desmaison, Luca Antiga, and Adam Lerer. Au- tomatic differentiation in pytorch. InNIPS-W, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [5]

    Pennylane: Automatic differentia- tion of hybrid quantum-classical computations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04968, 2018

    Ville Bergholm, Josh Izaac, Maria Schuld, Christian Gogolin, Shahnawaz Ahmed, Vishnu Ajith, M Sohaib Alam, Guillermo Alonso-Linaje, B AkashNarayanan, Ali Asadi, et al. Pennylane: Automatic differentia- tion of hybrid quantum-classical computations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04968, 2018

    arXiv 2018

  7. [6]

    Evaluating analytic gradi- ents on quantum hardware.Physical Review A, 99(3): 032331, 2019

    Maria Schuld, Ville Bergholm, Christian Gogolin, Josh Izaac, and Nathan Killoran. Evaluating analytic gradi- ents on quantum hardware.Physical Review A, 99(3): 032331, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [7]

    Simultaneous perturbation stochas- tic approximation of the quantum fisher information

    Julien Gacon, Christa Zoufal, Giuseppe Carleo, and Stefan Woerner. Simultaneous perturbation stochas- tic approximation of the quantum fisher information. Quantum, 5:567, 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    Pegasos: Primal estimated sub-gradient solver for SVM

    Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Yoram Singer, and Nathan Sre- bro. Pegasos: Primal estimated sub-gradient solver for SVM. In Proceedings of the 24th international confer- ence on Machine learning, pages 807–814, 2007

    2007

  2. [9]

    Quantum inference on bayesian networks

    Guang Hao Low, Theodore J Yoder, and Isaac L Chuang. Quantum inference on bayesian networks. Physical Review A, 89(6):062315, 2014

    2014

  3. [10]

    Quantum circuit representation of bayesian networks

    Sima E Borujeni, Saideep Nannapaneni, Nam H Nguyen, Elizabeth C Behrman, and James E Steck. Quantum circuit representation of bayesian networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 176:114768, 2021

    2021

  4. [11]

    An overview of the simultaneous pertur- bation method for efficient optimization.Johns Hopkins apl technical digest, 19(4):482–492, 1998

    James C Spall. An overview of the simultaneous pertur- bation method for efficient optimization.Johns Hopkins apl technical digest, 19(4):482–492, 1998

    1998

  5. [12]

    Quantum kernel alignment with stochastic gradient descent

    Gian Gentinetta, David Sutter, Christa Zoufal, Bryce Fuller, and Stefan Woerner. Quantum kernel alignment with stochastic gradient descent. In2023 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Quantum Computing and Engi- neering (QCE), volume 1, pages 256–262. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  6. [13]

    The power of quantum neural networks

    Amira Abbas, David Sutter, Christa Zoufal, Aurélien Lucchi, Alessio Figalli, and Stefan Woerner. The power of quantum neural networks. Nature Computational Science, 1(6):403–409, 2021

    2021

  7. [14]

    A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization

    Richard H Byrd, Peihuang Lu, Jorge Nocedal, and Ciyou Zhu. A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM Journal on scientific computing, 16(5):1190–1208, 1995

    1995

  8. [15]

    A view of algorithms for optimiza- tion without derivatives

    Michael JD Powell. A view of algorithms for optimiza- tion without derivatives. Mathematics Today-Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications, 43 (5):170–174, 2007

    2007

  9. [16]

    A software package for sequential quadratic programming

    Dieter Kraft. A software package for sequential quadratic programming. Forschungsbericht- Deutsche Forschungs- und Versuchsanstalt fur Luft- und Raum- fahrt, 1988

    1988

  10. [17]

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization

    Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Sequential minimal optimization for quantum-classical hybrid algorithms

    Ken M Nakanishi, Keisuke Fujii, and Synge Todo. Sequential minimal optimization for quantum-classical hybrid algorithms. Physical Review Research, 2(4): 043158, 2020

    2020

  12. [19]

    Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces

    Vojtěch Havlíček, Antonio D Córcoles, Kristan Temme, Aram W Harrow, Abhinav Kandala, Jerry M Chow, and Jay M Gambetta. Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces. Nature, 567(7747): 209–212, 2019

    2019

  13. [20]

    Covariant quantum kernels for data with group structure.Nature Physics, 20(3):479– 483, 2024

    JenniferRGlick, TanviPGujarati, AntonioDCorcoles, Youngseok Kim, Abhinav Kandala, Jay M Gambetta, and Kristan Temme. Covariant quantum kernels for data with group structure.Nature Physics, 20(3):479– 483, 2024

    2024

  14. [21]

    Quantum generative adversarial networks for learning and loading random distributions.npj Quantum Infor- mation, 5(1):103, 2019

    Christa Zoufal, Aurélien Lucchi, and Stefan Woerner. Quantum generative adversarial networks for learning and loading random distributions.npj Quantum Infor- mation, 5(1):103, 2019

    2019

  15. [22]

    An artificial neuron imple- mented on an actual quantum processor.npj Quantum Information, 5(1):1–8, 2019

    Francesco Tacchino, Chiara Macchiavello, Dario Ger- ace, and Daniele Bajoni. An artificial neuron imple- mented on an actual quantum processor.npj Quantum Information, 5(1):1–8, 2019

    2019

  16. [23]

    Opti- mizing quantum classification algorithms on classical benchmark datasets

    ManuelJohn, JulianSchuhmacher, PanagiotisBarkout- sos, Ivano Tavernelli, and Francesco Tacchino. Opti- mizing quantum classification algorithms on classical benchmark datasets. Entropy, 25(6):860, 2023

    2023

  17. [24]

    When machine learning meets quantum computers: A case study

    Weiwen Jiang, Jinjun Xiong, and Yiyu Shi. When machine learning meets quantum computers: A case study. InProceedings of the 26th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, pages 385–390. ACM,

  18. [25]

    Quantum text classifier: A synchronistic ap- proach towards classical and quantum machine learn- ing

    Prabhat Santi, Kamakhya Mishra, and Sibabrata Mo- hanty. Quantum text classifier: A synchronistic ap- proach towards classical and quantum machine learn- ing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12783, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.12783. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2305.12783

    2023 doi arXiv

  19. [26]

    Quan- tum machine learning with qiskit: Evaluating regres- sion accuracy and noise impact

    Amit Kumar, Neha Sharma, Nikhil Kumar Marriwala, Sunita Panda, M Aruna, and Jeetendra Kumar. Quan- tum machine learning with qiskit: Evaluating regres- sion accuracy and noise impact. IET Quantum Com- munication, 5(4):310–321, 2024

    2024

  20. [27]

    Pulse-efficient quantum machine learning

    André Melo, Nathan Earnest-Noble, and Francesco Tacchino. Pulse-efficient quantum machine learning. Quantum, 7:1130, 2023. doi:10.22331/q-2023-10-09-

    2023 doi

  21. [28]

    Classical splitting of parametrized quantum circuits

    Cenk Tüysüz, Giuseppe Clemente, Arianna Crippa, To- bias Hartung, Stefan Kühn, and Karl Jansen. Classical splitting of parametrized quantum circuits. Quantum Machine Intelligence, 5(2):34, 2023

    2023

  22. [29]

    Im- pact of quantum noise on the training of quantum gen- erative adversarial networks

    Kerstin Borras, Su Yeon Chang, Lena Funcke, Michele Grossi, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Dirk Kruecker, Stefan Kühn, Florian Rehm, Cenk Tüysüz, et al. Im- pact of quantum noise on the training of quantum gen- erative adversarial networks. In Journal of Physics: Conference Seri...

    2023

  23. [30]

    Symmetry breaking in geometric quantum machine learning in the presence of noise.PRX Quantum, 5(3):030314, 2024

    Cenk Tüysüz, Su Yeon Chang, Maria Demidik, Karl Jansen, SofiaVallecorsa, andMicheleGrossi. Symmetry breaking in geometric quantum machine learning in the presence of noise.PRX Quantum, 5(3):030314, 2024

    2024

  24. [31]

    Benchmarking Quan- tum Convolutional Neural Networks for Signal Clas- sification in Simulated Gamma-Ray Burst Detection

    Farida Farsian, Nicolò Parmiggiani, Alessandro Rizzo, Gabriele Panebianco, Andrea Bulgarelli, Francesco Schillirò, Carlo Burigana, Vincenzo Cardone, Luca Cappelli, Massimo Meneghetti, Giuseppe Murante, Giuseppe Sarracino, Roberto Scaramella, Vincenzo Testa, and Tiziana Trombet...

    2025 doi arXiv

  25. [32]

    Tavani, G

    M. Tavani, G. Barbiellini, A. Argan, A. Bulgarelli, P. Caraveo, A. Chen, V. Cocco, E. Costa, G. de Paris, E. Del Monte, G. Di Cocco, I. Donnarumma, M. Feroci, M. Fiorini, T. Froysland, F. Fuschino, M. Galli, F. Gi- anotti, A. Giuliani, Y. Evangelista, C. Labanti, I. Lap- shov,...

    2008

  26. [33]

    Rizzo, N

    A. Rizzo, N. Parmiggiani, A. Bulgarelli, A. Macaluso, V. Fioretti, L. Castaldini, A. Di Piano, G. Panebianco, C. Pittori, M. Tavani, C. Sartori, C. Burigana, V. Cardone, F. Farsian, M. Meneghetti, G. Murante, R. Scaramella, F. Schillirò, V. Testa, and T. Trombetti. Quantum Con...

    2024 doi arXiv

  27. [34]

    Quan- tum machine learning framework for longitudinal biomedical studies

    Maria Demidik, Filippo Utro, Alexey Galda, Karl Jansen, Daniel Blankenberg, and Laxmi Parida. Quan- tum machine learning framework for longitudinal biomedical studies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.18392, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Quantum machine learning framework for virtual screening in drug discovery: a prospective quantum advantage.Ma- chine Learning: Science and Technology, 4(1):015023, 2023

    Stefano Mensa, Emre Sahin, Francesco Tacchino, Pana- giotis Kl Barkoutsos, and Ivano Tavernelli. Quantum machine learning framework for virtual screening in drug discovery: a prospective quantum advantage.Ma- chine Learning: Science and Technology, 4(1):015023, 2023

    2023

  29. [36]

    Efficient parameter optimisation for quantum kernel alignment: A sub- sampling approach in variational training

    M Emre Sahin, Benjamin CB Symons, Pushpak Pati, Fayyaz Minhas, Declan Millar, Maria Gabrani, Stefano Mensa, and Jan Lukas Robertus. Efficient parameter optimisation for quantum kernel alignment: A sub- sampling approach in variational training. Quantum, 8:1502, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learning

    Yunchao Liu, Srinivasan Arunachalam, and Kristan Temme. A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learning. Nature Physics, 17(9): 1013–1017, 2021. Appendix A: Open-source contributors This list includes contributors to the source code of Qiskit ML, and the ...

    2021

  31. [1130]

    URL https://quantum-journal.org/papers/ q-2023-10-09-1130/. 6

    2023

  32. [2021]

    URLhttps://dl

    doi:10.1145/3394885.3431629. URLhttps://dl. acm.org/doi/10.1145/3394885.3431629

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.