A Vafa-Intriligator formula for semi-positive quotients of linear spaces

Riccardo Ontani

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 12 references

A Vafa-Intriligator formula for semi-positive quotients of linear spaces

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For semi-positive quotients $V/\!/G$, the genus-zero quasimap generating series is a rational function given by a finite sum over the fiber of a toric period map.

desk verdict Solid abelianization-to-toric reduction, but the Vafa-Intriligator theorem rests on a shaky comparison with Szenes-Vergne's Morrison-Plesser version; deserves refereeing with a mandate for major revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.17845 v1 pith:H7EF2M3V submitted 2025-05-23 math.AG

Riccardo Ontani This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AG MSC 14N3514L2414M25

keywords quasimapinvariantsVafa-IntriligatorformulaGITquotientsabelianisationJeffrey-Kirwanresiduessemi-positivegeneratingseriestoricreduction

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that, for smooth projective quotients of a vector space by a reductive group satisfying a semi-positive GIT condition, genus-zero quasimap invariants can be organised into a generating series that extends to a rational function. The rational function has the Vafa–Intriligator form: a finite sum of explicit rational contributions indexed by the preimage of a point under a toric period map. The proof goes through an abelianisation formula that expresses invariants of $V/\!/G$ as a Weyl-group average of invariants of the torus quotient $V/\!/T$, with a root-correction factor, and then through Jeffrey–Kirwan residue expressions that settle a known residue conjecture for targets of this form. A reader should care because these are general non-abelian GIT quotients, and the conclusion turns what is a priori an infinite formal power series into finitely computable intersection numbers.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is abelianisation: an invariant of $V/\!/G$ with insertion $P$ equals $\frac{1}{|W|}$ times the sum over lifts of the degree to a maximal torus $T$ of the corresponding invariant of $V/\!/T$ multiplied by a root-correction factor $\prod_{\alpha\in\Delta} D(\tilde\delta,\alpha)$. This reduces non-abelian targets to toric targets, where the quasimap moduli are toric quotients of linear spaces. There the paper uses the period map $p(u)=\sum_{\rho\in A}\frac{\log(\rho(u))}{2\pi i}[\rho]$ and its Jacobian determinant $D_A$ to apply the toric Vafa–Intriligator theorem: the generating series converges when the ray of the stability parameter meets the convergence domain, and on that domain it coincides with a finite sum over the fiber of $p$, twisted by the involution $\sigma$.

What would settle it

Take a rank-two semi-positive toric example whose momentum chamber splits into two simplicial cones, compute the coefficient growth of the abelian generating series in a $c$-positive basis to bound its convergence domain $D$, and check whether the ray spanned by the stability parameter intersects $D$; Lemma 5.4 predicts it does, and a miss would invalidate Theorem 5.3 and the equality in Theorem 5.4. Alternatively, evaluate the claimed identity at a point $q$ of the dual group where the defining sum has a denominator $D_A$ vanishing on the fiber; Remark 12 asserts the rational extension still exists there, so a computed pole would disprove the formula.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 5.4: for a representation $V$ of a reductive group $G$ with a stability parameter $\xi$ for which the action on the semistable locus is free and $V/\!/T$ is proper and semi-positive, the generating series $\langle P\rangle_y^G(q)$ of $\mathbb{C}^*$-equivariant genus-zero quasimap invariants extends to a rational function and equals $\langle P\rangle_y^B(\sigma(q))$ on its domain of convergence. Here $\langle P\rangle_y^B$ is the finite sum over $w\in p^{-1}(q)$ of explicit terms built from the weights of $T$ on $V$ and the roots of $G$, with the Jacobian determinant of the period map $p$ in the denominator, and $\sigma$ is an involution of the dual torus. If this is right, the paper's earlier abelianisation and residue results imply that the residue conjecture from [Kim+20] holds for all targets of the form $V/\!/G$, and that genus-zero quasimap counts for semi-positive quotients are finite and explicitly computable.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument assumes that the ray spanned by the stability parameter inside the character lattice meets the convergence domain of the abelian generating series; that lemma is asserted with a compressed proof, and the paper also relies on a reduction step that removes an auxiliary correction term from the toric formula without a fully detailed justification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Genus-zero quasimap invariants of semi-positive quotients $V/\!/G$ are finite and explicitly computable from the weights and roots of $V$, without summing infinitely many residue contributions.
The residue conjecture posed in [Kim+20] holds for every target of the form $V/\!/G$ covered by the hypotheses.
The non-equivariant limit $z=0$ gives a Jeffrey–Kirwan residue formula for ordinary quasimap invariants of $V/\!/G$.
In the Grassmannian case, with $V=\mathrm{Mat}_{r\times n}(\mathbb{C})$ and $G=\mathrm{GL}_r(\mathbb{C})$, the formula specialises to the known Vafa–Intriligator formula for Quot schemes.
The abelian series converges on a nonempty open region of the dual torus, and the non-abelian series inherits convergence on an analytic open subset of the dual group under semi-positivity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial extension: the right-hand side of Theorem 5.4 is independent of the stability parameter except through the domain where the left series converges, so wall-crossing between stability chambers reduces to choosing which region of the dual torus the series represents; this could yield a direct wall-crossing proof for these invariants.
Editorial extension: the finite-sum structure suggests a higher-genus analogue for these quotients, but the paper proves only genus zero and does not claim such an extension.
Editorial extension: applying the formula to quotients beyond Grassmannians, such as quiver flag varieties or partial flag varieties, should give explicit finite-sum intersection numbers that can be checked against known quantum-cohomology results.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a worthwhile reduction paper with one load-bearing proof gap in the toric input. The abelianization and JK-residue sections are careful and new; the Vafa-Intriligator theorem as stated is not yet fully supported.

What's actually new: Theorem 3.2 extends Webb's abelianization of I-functions to quasimap invariants with arbitrary insertions P; Theorem 4.1 gives the JK residue formula for nonabelian quotients, confirming the Kim-Oh-Ueda-Yoshida conjecture for V//G. The idea of reducing the VI formula to the toric case via a Weyl-group average is natural and the Grassmannian check is convincing.

The soft spots: Lemma 5.4 is compressed—the induction over simplicial cones and the convexity claim need more detail. That is probably fixable. The bigger problem is Appendix B. Theorem 5.4's proof is one sentence pointing to Szenes-Vergne, but the version the author needs (Theorem B.1) is not literally their theorem. Remark 16 admits SV04's series has an extra Morrison-Plesser class; the author says it doesn't appear for V//T, but doesn't reconcile that with the virtual class of Example 2.1, which itself contributes the factor ∏ρ^{-1-<λ,ρ>}. Equality (32) between xPy_T and xPy_{A,c} is the load-bearing line and is not justified. The descent step is also too quick: no invariance under the kernel of u is checked, and descent for rational functions is not trivial. This is a genuine gap, though I suspect the statement is true and provable by running the toric localization directly.

If I'm right, the paper is a solid framework with a fixable but real gap. I'd send it to a good referee with instructions to focus on Appendix B and Lemma 5.4. The audience is enumerative geometers in quasimaps and mirror symmetry; they will use the abelianization formula even while the VI part is being sorted out. My vote: accept for peer review, with the clear expectation of major revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies genus-zero C*-equivariant quasimap invariants of GIT quotients V//G of a linear representation V by a reductive group G. The main results are: an abelianisation formula (Theorem 3.2) expressing invariants of V//G as a Weyl-group average of invariants of V//T with an explicit root correction; a Jeffrey-Kirwan residue formula for fixed degree (Theorem 4.1, Corollary 4.1); and, under a semi-positivity assumption, a Vafa-Intriligator formula (Theorem 5.4) expressing the generating series as a finite sum over preimages of a map p on the dual torus. The proof strategy is to abelianise, apply the toric Vafa-Intriligator theorem of Szenes and Vergne, and then descend back to the dual group. The paper also recovers the Marian-Oprea formula for Grassmannians as a special case.

Significance. The abelianisation and residue formulae are detailed and give a substantial new computational tool: they reduce nonabelian quasimap invariants to explicit toric residues, with no fitted constants, and the specialization to Grassmannians reproduces a known formula. If Theorem 5.4 is fully established, it would provide a general Vafa-Intriligator formula for semi-positive quotients of linear spaces and settle the Kim-Oh-Ueda-Yoshida residue conjecture for this class of targets. However, the proof of Theorem 5.4 relies on two points that are not fully supported: the convergence lemma 5.4 and the no-Morrison-Plesser version of the Szenes-Vergne theorem in Appendix B. These points are load-bearing, so the main theorem is currently conditional.

major comments (2)

[Appendix B, Theorem B.1 and Remark 16] Theorem 5.4 is reduced in its proof to Theorem B.1, but Theorem B.1 is not actually established from the cited Szenes-Vergne result. Remark 16 concedes that in [SV04] every coefficient carries an additional Morrison-Plesser class, and the assertion that this class "doesn't appear" for V//T is not justified: Example 2.1 shows that the virtual class of the toric quasimap space involves the nontrivial factor prod_{rho: <delta,rho><0} rho^{-1-<delta,rho>}. Furthermore, the descent step at the end of Appendix B invokes [Vis04, Theorem 4.33] to conclude that xPy_B is rational on qT from rationality of xPy_B o u, but it does not check invariance of the function under the kernel of u, nor does it explain why descent for rational functions follows from descent for quasi-coherent sheaves. Because the proof of Theorem 5.4 is a direct appeal to Theorem B.1, this gap is load-bearing.
[Lemma 5.4] The proof of Lemma 5.4 is compressed and relies on the assertion that D is convex "by the general theory of power series". While convergence domains of power series are logarithmically convex, the convexity of the set D in the additive coordinates on chi(T)_R is not immediate from this phrase, because D is defined as a preimage under the exponential map and the relevant power series coordinates depend on a c-positive basis (Theorem 5.2). Since Lemma 5.4 is the step that produces a point in the intersection of the ray spanned by xi with the convergence domain, Theorem 5.3 and the equality in Theorem 5.4 on the stated convergence domain depend on it. A complete proof or a precise citation should be supplied, and the induction over simplicial cones should justify the claim that the auxiliary open set U intersects some top-dimensional cone in an interior point.

minor comments (4)

[Remark 10] There is a likely typo: the text says "if delta is not a xi-effective class, then the moduli space Q(V//T,delta) is nonempty and delta does not contribute to the power series"; the intended statement is presumably that the moduli space is empty.
[Definition 5.2 and Lemma 5.3] The sign conventions for the coordinate maps should be reconciled: Definition 5.2 sets q_i([psi]) = e^{2 pi i <lambda_i,psi>}, while Lemma 5.3 uses the map x -> (e^{-2 pi x_1}, ..., e^{-2 pi x_r}) with no reference to that formula.
[Theorem 5.2] The statement of Theorem 5.2 is grammatically tangled ("For every integral basis ... the dual basis lambda is called a c-positive basis. Let lambda be a c-positive basis. If lambda in chi(T)^* is a degree...") and should be rewritten so that the quantifiers over bases and degrees are explicit.
[Equation (1) and Definition 5.4] The notation D is used both for the rational function D(delta,w) in (1) and for the Jacobian determinant D_A in (24); this is potentially confusing and should be disambiguated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the nonabelian Vafa-Intriligator formula is derived from external toric results (Webb and Szenes-Vergne) via abelianization, with no fitted or self-defined quantity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is a reduction rather than a circle. Theorem 3.2 is imported from Webb's abelianization theorem [Web23], and Appendix A explicitly says 'No argument here is really original: we just check that Webb's proof goes through without obstructions'; so the abelianization input is an external result, not the paper's own conclusion. The toric Vafa-Intriligator equality xPyT(q) = xPyB(q) is cited to Szenes and Vergne [SV04, Theorem 4.1], and Theorem 5.4 combines that external toric formula with Theorem 5.1 (a direct consequence of the external abelianization) and Theorem 5.3. The right-hand side (25) is an explicit finite sum over the finite fibers of the map p, not a restatement of the generating series being computed; no parameter is fitted to the left-hand side. The only self-citation is [Ont23], used for the C*-equivariant Jeffrey-Kirwan localization theorem in Section 4; the paper itself describes the same residue formula as obtainable by an alternative route 'for example in the form of [Ont23]' (Section 1.1.2), and the main convergence/Vafa-Intriligator theorem does not depend on that intermediate theorem. Appendix B's adaptation of Szenes-Vergne is admittedly not verbatim: Remark 16 concedes that in [SV04] each coefficient carries an additional Morrison-Plesser class, and the fpqc descent step from u-rationality to rationality on qT is asserted rather than proved. That is a correctness gap in an external input, not a circularity, because Theorem B.1 is not defined in terms of the paper's own target invariants and no assumption is equivalent to the conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a reductionist proof: it imports quasimap localization, Webb's I-function abelianization, and Szenes-Vergne's toric Vafa-Intriligator theorem as external benchmarks. There are no free parameters fitted to data and no invented entities; the main assumptions are the GIT hypotheses of free actions, properness, and semi-positivity.

assumptions (9)

standard math Quasimap moduli spaces Q(V//G, delta) have a perfect obstruction theory and virtual fundamental class, as constructed in CKM14, Theorem 7.2.2.
Used throughout to define the invariants; taken as a black box from the quasimap literature.
standard math The C*-fixed locus of Q(V//G, delta) decomposes as the disjoint union of F_{delta1,delta2}, as in CK13, Section 4, recalled as Proposition 2.1.
This localization structure is the starting point for all fixed-locus computations in Sections 2 and 3.
standard math Martin-Maddock integration formula (Theorem 3.1): if g*alpha = j*beta then the integral over V//G equals 1/|W| times the integral over V//T of beta times the product of root line bundle classes.
This is the key bridge between nonabelian and abelian quotients in the abelianisation argument.
standard math Webb's abelian-nonabelian correspondence for I-functions (Web23, Theorem 1.1.1) and its fixed-locus version in Lemma A.1.
The paper's Lemma 3.1 is explicitly a check that Webb's proof extends to insertions P different from 1.
standard math Szenes-Vergne toric Vafa-Intriligator formula (SV04, Theorem 4.1), in the form recalled as Theorem B.1.
Theorem 5.4 is a reduction to this toric result via the abelianisation formula.
standard math Shoemaker's identification NE(xi) = c^vee for the effective cone of stable quasimap degrees (Sho22, Theorem 1.7), used in Lemma 5.1.
This converts the semi-positivity condition into a statement about the chamber c in the momentum cone.
domain assumption The actions of G and T are free on the semistable loci and V//T, hence V//G, is proper.
This is a standing hypothesis of the paper and excludes non-free GIT quotients; it is needed for the moduli spaces to be well behaved.
domain assumption Semi-positivity: the anticanonical character kappa = sum of weights lies in the closure of the chamber c, and is in the interior in the positive case.
This assumption controls convergence of the generating series and is the condition under which the Vafa-Intriligator formula is proved.
standard math The convergence domain D of a multivariable power series is logarithmically convex, used in Lemma 5.4.
This classical fact is invoked without proof, but the specific intersection argument in Lemma 5.4 is not fully written out.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Vafa-Intriligator formula for semi-positive quotients of linear spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H7EF2M3V

@misc{pith2026250517845,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Vafa-Intriligator formula for semi-positive quotients of linear spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H7EF2M3V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.17845}
}

abstract

We consider genus zero quasimap invariants of smooth projective targets of the form $V/\!/G$, where $V$ is a representation of a reductive group $G$. In particular we consider integrals of cohomology classes arising as characteristic classes of the universal quasimap. In this setting, we provide a way to express the invariants of $V/\!/G$ in terms of invariants of $V/\!/T$, where $T$ is a maximal subtorus of $G$. Using this, we obtain residue formulae for such invariants as conjectured by Kim, Oh, Yoshida and Ueda. Finally, under some positivity assumptions on $V/\!/G$, we prove a Vafa-Intriligator formula for the generating series of such invariants, expressing them as finite sums of explicit contributions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.17845 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** For every simplicial cone s spanned by integral elements of c, a translation s is contained in the inverse image D of the convergence domain of xPy T . Being χpGqR a linear subspace, this means that if it intersects the interior of s, then it intersects D too. Lemma 5.4. Let L be a ray centered at the origin of χpTqR and contained in the interior of the chamber c. Then D X L ‰ H. Proof. Consider a decomposition of … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

[1]

Towards a Schubert calculus for maps from a Riemann surface to a Grassmannian

[Ber94] A. Bertram. “Towards a Schubert calculus for maps from a Riemann surface to a Grassmannian”. In:International Journal of Mathemat- ics 5.06 (1994). arXiv:alg-geom/9403007, pp. 811–825. [BF97] K. Behrend and B. Fantechi. “The intrinsic normal cone”. In:Inven- tiones Mathematicae128 (1997). arXiv:alg-geom/9601010, p

work page Pith review arXiv 1994
[5]

arXiv:math/9903178. 1999, p

arXiv 1999
[45]

Toric Residues and Mirror Symmetry

[BM02] V. V. Batyrev and E. N. Materov. “Toric residues and mir- ror symmetry”. In: Moscow Mathematical Journal 2.3 (2002). arXiv:math/0203216, pp. 435–475. [Bri96] M. Brion. “The push-forward and Todd class of flag bundles”. In: Banach Center Publications36 (1996), pp. 45–50. [BV99] M. Brion and M. Vergne. “Arrangement of hyperplanes. I. Rational functio...

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[291]

Residue Mirror Symmetry for Grassmannians

[Kim+20] B. Kim et al. “Residue Mirror Symmetry for Grassmannians”. In: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics332 (2020). arXiv:1607.08317. [Mad14] Z. Maddock. “A ratio of integration between quotients in geo- metric invariant theory”. In:Transformation Groups 19.1 (2014). arXiv:1210.4253, pp. 131–158. [Mar00] S. Martin. “Symplectic quotients by...

arXiv 2020
[453]

NotesonGrothendiecktopologies,fiberedcategoriesand descent theory

[Vis04] A.Vistoli.“NotesonGrothendiecktopologies,fiberedcategoriesand descent theory”. In:arXiv preprint(2004). arXiv:math/0412512. [Web19] R. Webb. “Quasimaps and some examples of stacks for everybody”. arXiv:1910.07262

arXiv 2004
[715]

Moduli stacks of stable toric quasimaps

[CK10] I. Ciocan-Fontanine and B. Kim. “Moduli stacks of stable toric quasimaps”. In: Advances in Mathematics 225.6 (2010). arXiv:0908.4446, pp. 3022–3051. [CK13] I. Ciocan-Fontanine and B. Kim. “Wall-crossing in genus zero quasimap theory and mirror maps”. In:Algebraic Geometry1 (Apr. 2013). arXiv:1304.7056. [CKM14] I. Ciocan-Fontanine, B. Kim, and D. Ma...

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[2000]

Counts of maps to Grassmannians and intersections on the moduli space of bundles

[MO07a] A. Marian and D. Oprea. “Counts of maps to Grassmannians and intersections on the moduli space of bundles”. In:Journal of Differ- ential Geometry76.1 (2007). arXiv:math/0602335, pp. 155–175. [MO07b] A. Marian and D. Oprea. “Virtual intersections on the Quot scheme and Vafa-Intriligator formulas”. In: Duke Math. J. 136.1 (2007). arXiv:math/0505685,...

work page Pith review arXiv 2007
[2013]

A mirror theorem for toric complete intersections

[Giv98] A. Givental. “A mirror theorem for toric complete intersections”. In: Topological field theory, primitive forms and related topics . arXiv:alg-geom/9701016. Springer, 1998, pp. 141–175. [GP97] T. B. Graber and R. Pandharipande. “Localization of virtual classes”. In: Inventiones mathematicae 135 (1997). arXiv:alg- geom/9708001, pp. 487–518. [JK95] ...

work page Pith review arXiv 1997

Show all 12 references

[2019]

The abelian–nonabelian correspondence for I-functions

[Web23] R. Webb. “The abelian–nonabelian correspondence for I-functions”. In: International Mathematics Research Notices 2023.3 (2023). arXiv:1804.07786, pp. 2592–2648. [Zho22] Y. Zhou. “Quasimap wall-crossing for GIT quotients”. In: Inven- tiones mathematicae227.2 (2022). arX...

2023 arXiv
[2022]

On quantum cohomology rings of Fano manifolds and a formula of Vafa and Intriligator

[ST97] B. Siebert and G. Tian. “On quantum cohomology rings of Fano manifolds and a formula of Vafa and Intriligator”. In:Asian Journal of Mathematics 1.4 (1997). arXiv:alg-geom/9403010, pp. 679–695. 43 [Sta25] T. Stacks project authors. The Stacks project. https://stacks. mat...

1997 arXiv
[2023]

Log Calabi-Yau surfaces and Jeffrey- Kirwan residues

[OS24] R. Ontani and J. Stoppa. “Log Calabi-Yau surfaces and Jeffrey- Kirwan residues”. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society176.3 (2024). arXiv:2109.13048, pp. 547–592. [Sho22] M. Shoemaker. “A Kleiman criterion for GIT stack quotients”. arXiv:2211.09218

2024 arXiv
[2025]

Toric reduction and a conjecture of Batyrev and Materov

[SV04] A. Szenes and M. Vergne. “Toric reduction and a conjecture of Batyrev and Materov”. In:Inventiones Mathematicae158.3 (2004). arXiv:math/0306311, p

2004 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Towards a Schubert calculus for maps from a Riemann surface to a Grassmannian

[Ber94] A. Bertram. “Towards a Schubert calculus for maps from a Riemann surface to a Grassmannian”. In:International Journal of Mathemat- ics 5.06 (1994). arXiv:alg-geom/9403007, pp. 811–825. [BF97] K. Behrend and B. Fantechi. “The intrinsic normal cone”. In:Inven- tiones Mathematicae128 (1997). arXiv:alg-geom/9601010, p

work page Pith review arXiv 1994

[2] [5]

arXiv:math/9903178. 1999, p

arXiv 1999

[3] [45]

Toric Residues and Mirror Symmetry

[BM02] V. V. Batyrev and E. N. Materov. “Toric residues and mir- ror symmetry”. In: Moscow Mathematical Journal 2.3 (2002). arXiv:math/0203216, pp. 435–475. [Bri96] M. Brion. “The push-forward and Todd class of flag bundles”. In: Banach Center Publications36 (1996), pp. 45–50. [BV99] M. Brion and M. Vergne. “Arrangement of hyperplanes. I. Rational functio...

work page Pith review arXiv 2002

[4] [291]

Residue Mirror Symmetry for Grassmannians

[Kim+20] B. Kim et al. “Residue Mirror Symmetry for Grassmannians”. In: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics332 (2020). arXiv:1607.08317. [Mad14] Z. Maddock. “A ratio of integration between quotients in geo- metric invariant theory”. In:Transformation Groups 19.1 (2014). arXiv:1210.4253, pp. 131–158. [Mar00] S. Martin. “Symplectic quotients by...

arXiv 2020

[5] [453]

NotesonGrothendiecktopologies,fiberedcategoriesand descent theory

[Vis04] A.Vistoli.“NotesonGrothendiecktopologies,fiberedcategoriesand descent theory”. In:arXiv preprint(2004). arXiv:math/0412512. [Web19] R. Webb. “Quasimaps and some examples of stacks for everybody”. arXiv:1910.07262

arXiv 2004

[6] [715]

Moduli stacks of stable toric quasimaps

[CK10] I. Ciocan-Fontanine and B. Kim. “Moduli stacks of stable toric quasimaps”. In: Advances in Mathematics 225.6 (2010). arXiv:0908.4446, pp. 3022–3051. [CK13] I. Ciocan-Fontanine and B. Kim. “Wall-crossing in genus zero quasimap theory and mirror maps”. In:Algebraic Geometry1 (Apr. 2013). arXiv:1304.7056. [CKM14] I. Ciocan-Fontanine, B. Kim, and D. Ma...

work page Pith review arXiv 2010

[7] [2000]

Counts of maps to Grassmannians and intersections on the moduli space of bundles

[MO07a] A. Marian and D. Oprea. “Counts of maps to Grassmannians and intersections on the moduli space of bundles”. In:Journal of Differ- ential Geometry76.1 (2007). arXiv:math/0602335, pp. 155–175. [MO07b] A. Marian and D. Oprea. “Virtual intersections on the Quot scheme and Vafa-Intriligator formulas”. In: Duke Math. J. 136.1 (2007). arXiv:math/0505685,...

work page Pith review arXiv 2007

[8] [2013]

A mirror theorem for toric complete intersections

[Giv98] A. Givental. “A mirror theorem for toric complete intersections”. In: Topological field theory, primitive forms and related topics . arXiv:alg-geom/9701016. Springer, 1998, pp. 141–175. [GP97] T. B. Graber and R. Pandharipande. “Localization of virtual classes”. In: Inventiones mathematicae 135 (1997). arXiv:alg- geom/9708001, pp. 487–518. [JK95] ...

work page Pith review arXiv 1997