Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 70 references

The UD-NewsCrawl Treebank: Reflections and Challenges from a Large-scale Tagalog Syntactic Annotation Project

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper presents UD-NewsCrawl, a 15,619-sentence manually annotated Tagalog treebank, and shows that parsers trained on it outperform previous Tagalog dependency parsers.

desk verdict A genuinely useful 15.6k-sentence Tagalog treebank, released, but the annotation-quality evidence is circular and needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.20428 v1 pith:32SGCAAQ submitted 2025-05-26 cs.CL

Angelina A. Aquino , Lester James V. Miranda , Elsie Marie T. Or This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CL
keywords TagalogtreebankUniversalDependenciesdependencyparsinglow-resourceNLPsyntacticannotationsymmetricalvoicetransformerbaselines
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

UD-NewsCrawl is presented as the largest Tagalog dependency treebank to date: 15,619 sentences and roughly 360,800 tokens manually annotated under the Universal Dependencies scheme, a cross-linguistic standard for parts of speech, morphological features, and syntactic relations. The paper documents a sixteen-month annotation effort involving native-speaker annotators, expert review, re-annotation, and a semi-automated quality-control loop, and it reports baseline taggers and parsers trained on the treebank. The central claim is that this resource moves Tagalog from a data-starved state—the two prior public treebanks contain only 149 sentences—to one where supervised transformer-based parsing is practical, with the best configuration beating previously reported results on both prior treebanks. The paper also argues that Tagalog's symmetrical voice system and flexible lexical categories force annotation choices that reveal English-centric assumptions in Universal Dependencies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the treebank itself: 15,619 sentences, each annotated with lemmas, universal parts of speech, a selected set of morphological features, and dependency relations, divided into training, development, and test splits. It carries the argument because it is the training signal for all baselines and the evidence that Tagalog syntax can be learned by supervised models. The second mechanism is a set of language-specific annotation conventions: the asymmetrical-voice treatment of Tagalog voice (all three voice forms are basic transitive clauses, with the ang-marked noun phrase as nsubj and non-subject agents labeled obj:agent), the morphological rule that assigns a word's part of speech by its affixes, and a silver-standard parsing model trained on the same annotations to flag disagreements for human review.

What would settle it

Take a random sample of, say, 200 UD-NewsCrawl sentences and have a new set of Tagalog-speaking linguists annotate them independently under the same guidelines; if inter-annotator agreement for dependency relations falls well below the 0.68 kappa the paper reports from its silver-standard model, the treebank's reliability premise is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that UD-NewsCrawl captures enough of Tagalog syntax that a parser trained on it outperforms all previously reported Tagalog parsers, including on the smaller existing Tagalog treebanks, and that the treebank provides the first canonical train/dev/test split for the language. The annotation adopts an asymmetrical-voice analysis: actor-, patient-, and locative-focus sentences are all treated as basic transitive clauses rather than active/passive pairs, the ang-marked argument is the dependency subject, and voice is stored as a morphological feature. The best baseline, built on multilingual transformer representations, reaches about 81 percent labeled attachment score on the test split, roughly five points above a model with no contextual embeddings, while a parser trained on a typologically similar language transfers poorly. The paper reads those results as evidence that Tagalog needs dedicated syntactic annotation and that the resulting treebank can serve as a reusable training and evaluation resource.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the treebank's annotations are accurate and consistent enough to serve as reliable training and evaluation data, even though the reported agreement is measured against a model trained on the same annotations and no independent inter-annotator agreement is reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Tagalog dependency parsing gains a canonical large training set, so future systems can be compared on a fixed split instead of through k-fold cross-validation on 149 sentences.
  • The best pipeline's gains transfer to the two older Tagalog treebanks, indicating that the resource captures syntactic patterns common to different genres and annotation styles.
  • The poor cross-lingual transfer results imply that dedicated Tagalog annotation is necessary and that multilingual transfer alone is not enough to parse Tagalog well.
  • The documented annotation decisions provide a concrete case for updating Universal Dependencies' language-specific guidelines for Tagalog, particularly for voice, determiners, and auxiliary-like words.
  • The treebank and baselines give a reusable benchmark for future work on lemmatization, part-of-speech tagging, morphological analysis, and dependency parsing in a low-resource Austronesian language.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the main quality metric is agreement between human annotations and a model trained on those same annotations, the reported kappa values do not measure reproducibility; an independent double-annotation study would be the natural next test.
  • With over 60 percent of sentences in entertainment and health topics and all text from 2011 news crawl, models trained here may lose accuracy on contemporary or conversational Tagalog; a small out-of-domain evaluation would quantify that drop.
  • The annotation choices that restrict determiner and auxiliary categories mean downstream models inherit sharp category boundaries; applications needing nuanced function-word behavior should check whether those boundaries matter.
  • The paper's critique of the subject relation suggests a testable alternative: labeling the ang-marked argument with a topic-like relation rather than nsubj, then comparing parser scores and linguistic adequacy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper introduces UD-NewsCrawl, a Tagalog Universal Dependencies treebank of 15,619 sentences manually annotated by 15 native-speaker annotators, and positions it as the largest Tagalog treebank to date. It describes the data collection from Leipzig NewsCrawl, the iterative annotation workflow, semi-automated quality control, and baseline dependency-parsing experiments with several feature representations, including fastText, monolingual RoBERTa-Tagalog, mDeBERTa-v3, and XLM-RoBERTa. The paper also evaluates cross-treebank generalization on UD-TRG and UD-Ugnayan, analyzes the topic distribution of the corpus, and discusses typological challenges that Tagalog poses for Universal Dependencies.

Significance. If the annotation-quality concern is addressed, this is a substantial contribution to low-resource NLP: it increases the available Tagalog UD treebank data by two orders of magnitude, is publicly released, and provides reproducible baseline models. The detailed documentation of annotation decisions for Tagalog voice marking, root categorization, and UD guideline departures is valuable for future work on Philippine-type languages. The paper also honestly documents topic skew and domain bias. These concrete, released resources are the main strengths of the manuscript.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.4 and §6.1, Table 3] The only quantitative quality evidence is Cohen's κ between the original annotations and a silver-standard model that was itself trained on those annotations (§4.4). This is not independent evidence of annotation reliability: the model is a function of the labels it is compared against, so the reported κ values (0.68–0.75) cannot establish human consistency or correctness. The paper reports no inter-annotator agreement, and the percentage of corrected sentences in Table 3 is computed only over sentences where the model disagreed, so it does not give an overall error rate. Because the treebank's reliability is load-bearing for its use as a gold-standard resource, this point needs to be addressed, for example by reporting IAA on a sample or by evaluating a held-out set against an external gold standard.
  2. [§6.2, Table 4] The claim that the models 'achieve state-of-the-art performance' is not supported by the comparisons shown. The earlier results in Table 4 come from systems trained on different data, with different model families, and under different evaluation protocols, so 'surpassing previously reported benchmarks' is not equivalent to state-of-the-art parsing for Tagalog. The authors should either rephrase this as 'outperforms previously published numbers on these datasets' with the caveat that the comparison is not controlled, or add a controlled comparison under identical training and evaluation conditions.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Abstract and dataset link] The dataset link 'Datasethf.co/datasets/UD-Filipino/UD_Tagalog-NewsCrawl' appears malformed; it should be given as a full URL, and the collection should be cited with a stable identifier.
  2. [§1] The phrase 'de factonation' appears to be a typo for 'de facto national', and the citation 'Philippine Statistics Authority)' is missing a year and has an unbalanced parenthesis.
  3. [§4.3] The abbreviation 'c.f.' should be 'cf.'.
  4. [Appendix D.2] There is a typo: 'hyperperameters' should be 'hyperparameters'.
  5. [Figure 1] The interlinear glosses in Figure 1 lack spaces between morpheme-by-morpheme gloss items (e.g., 'AV.PRF-giveNOMmanGENflowerLOCwoman'), making them difficult to read; adding spaces would improve clarity.
  6. [§6.1] The sentence 'The percentage of corrected sentences shows that a small portion of the annotations required adjustments' is vague because the percentage is computed only over sentences where the silver model disagreed; the denominator should be stated explicitly.
  7. [Appendix B.1] The full annotation guidelines are deferred until 'after the review period'; for a resource paper, the guidelines should be released with the final version so that annotation decisions are reproducible.
  8. [§3.1 and §B.1.4] The phrase 'ayinversion marker' should be 'ay inversion marker' (with a space) for consistency with standard Tagalog grammatical terminology.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Quality evidence is circular: agreement is measured against a silver-standard model trained on the same annotations, and no inter-annotator agreement is reported.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.4 (Treebank quality-control) and Section 6.1 (Quality analysis), Table 3]
    "First, we trained a silver-standard parsing model on our existing annotations using spaCy (Honnibal et al., 2020) and identified instances where the model's morphological annotations and dependency parsing relations disagree with human annotations. ... Table 3 shows the initial disagreement, as measured by Cohen's κ between the silver-standard model and the original annotations, together with the proportion of the disagreed sentences that we corrected."

    The silver-standard model is trained on the same UD-NewsCrawl annotations that §6.1 then uses as the reference for agreement. The reported κ values (0.68–0.75) therefore measure how well the model reproduces the labels it was fitted to, not an independent measure of annotation quality or human consistency. No inter-annotator agreement is reported, so the conclusion that 'the annotations are fairly consistent' rests entirely on a self-comparison with a model fitted to those same annotations. This is a fitted-input-called-prediction pattern: the model's agreement with its own training data is presented as evidence for the reliability of that data.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — that UD-NewsCrawl is the largest Tagalog treebank to date and supports dependency parser baselines — is independent and not circular. The parser experiments in §5 and the cross-treebank generalization study in §6.2 are genuine empirical contributions. However, the only quantitative quality evidence in §6.1 is Cohen's κ between the original annotations and a silver-standard model trained on those same annotations in §4.4. Because the model learns from the labels it is compared against, these agreement values do not independently verify human consistency or annotation correctness. The paper also reports no inter-annotator agreement, despite having 15 annotators. The paper's own Limitations section concedes that 'some inconsistencies may still exist despite quality-control,' which further tempers the quality claim. Overall, the central contribution stands on its own, but the quality-assurance evaluation is partially circular, warranting a score of 4 rather than 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on no fitted mathematical constants; the listed assumptions are domain choices that the paper itself acknowledges in places.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The Universal Dependencies framework is an appropriate annotation scheme for Tagalog despite known mismatches.
    The paper's entire premise is that UD can be applied to Tagalog, even while Section 3.2 and Section 7 document known incompatibilities (e.g., nsubj defined in Indo-European terms).
  • ad hoc to paper A silver-standard model trained on partially incorrect labels can identify annotation inconsistencies.
    Section 4.4 states this premise to justify using a model trained on existing annotations for quality control; it is not independently validated.
  • domain assumption The Leipzig NewsCrawl 2011 corpus is representative enough of Tagalog for training parsers.
    The treebank is built entirely from this corpus; the authors themselves note domain and topic bias in the Limitations section.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The UD-NewsCrawl Treebank: Reflections and Challenges from a Large-scale Tagalog Syntactic Annotation Project." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/32SGCAAQ

@misc{pith2026250520428,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The UD-NewsCrawl Treebank: Reflections and Challenges from a Large-scale Tagalog Syntactic Annotation Project},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/32SGCAAQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.20428}
}
read the original abstract

This paper presents UD-NewsCrawl, the largest Tagalog treebank to date, containing 15.6k trees manually annotated according to the Universal Dependencies framework. We detail our treebank development process, including data collection, pre-processing, manual annotation, and quality assurance procedures. We provide baseline evaluations using multiple transformer-based models to assess the performance of state-of-the-art dependency parsers on Tagalog. We also highlight challenges in the syntactic analysis of Tagalog given its distinctive grammatical properties, and discuss its implications for the annotation of this treebank. We anticipate that UD-NewsCrawl and our baseline model implementations will serve as valuable resources for advancing computational linguistics research in underrepresented languages like Tagalog.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.20428 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Example sentences illustrating features of Tagalog voice marking under a symmetrical voice analysis: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Annotation workflow for UD-NEWSCRAWL. sentences being isolated from their original con￾text, and some errors in the automated sentence tokenization produced fragments or run-on sen￾tences instead, which made the subsequent annota￾tion more challenging. 4.3 Annotation procedure An initial set of annotation guidelines was prepared based on the UD framework and the project’s anal￾ysis objectives. We then employed an it… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Topic distribution of UD-NEWSCRAWL using categories from SIB-200 (Adelani et al., 2024). previously reported benchmarks on both treebanks. The cross-treebank generalization indicates that de￾spite potential differences in domain, annotation style, or text genre, the syntactic patterns encoded in these models are potentially transferrable across various contexts. 6.3 Topics in UD-NEWSCRAWL Set-up. In order to identif… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Embedding map generated using the Nomic Atlas API for fine-grained topic classification. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Prompt template for topic classification. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Breakdown of L3 errors that relate to incom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    David Adelani, Hannah Liu, Xiaoyu Shen, Nikita Vassilyev, Jesujoba Alabi, Yanke Mao, Haonan Gao, and En-Shiun Lee. 2024. https://aclanthology.org/2024.eacl-long.14/ SIB -200: A simple, inclusive, and big evaluation dataset for topic classification in 200+ languages and dialects . In Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Associa...

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Z eljko Agi \'c . 2017. https://aclanthology.org/W17-0401 Cross-lingual parser selection for low-resource languages . In Proceedings of the N o D a L i D a 2017 Workshop on Universal Dependencies ( UDW 2017) , pages 1--10, Gothenburg, Sweden. Association for Computational Linguistics

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Angelina Aquino and Franz de Leon. 2020. https://aclanthology.org/2020.udw-1.2 Parsing in the absence of related languages: Evaluating low-resource dependency parsers on T agalog . In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW 2020), pages 8--15, Barcelona, Spain (Online). Association for Computational Linguistics

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Angelina Aquino and Franz de Leon. 2022. https://aclanthology.org/2022.paclic-1.22 Zero-shot and few-shot approaches for tokenization, tagging, and dependency parsing of T agalog text . In Proceedings of the 36th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pages 190--202, Manila, Philippines. Association for Computational Linguistics

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Mikel Artetxe, Sebastian Ruder, and Dani Yogatama. 2019. On the cross-lingual transferability of monolingual representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.11856

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Maria Bardaj\' i , Elsie Or, Angelina Aquino, and Nikolaus Himmelmann. 2024. The challenges of symmetrical voice languages for universal dependencies. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Jonathan Berant, Andrew Chou, Roy Frostig, and Percy Liang. 2013. https://aclanthology.org/D13-1160/ Semantic parsing on F reebase from question-answer pairs . In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1533--1544, Seattle, Washington, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics

    2013

  8. [8]

    Shaily Bhatt and Fernando Diaz. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.942 Extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in large language models . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, pages 16055--16074, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics

    doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.942 2024

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Frank R Blake. 1917. Reduplication in tagalog. The American journal of philology, 38(4):425--431

    1917

  2. [10]

    Robert Blust. 1991. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3623084 The Greater Central Philippines Hypothesis . Oceanic Linguistics, 30(2):73--129

    1991

  3. [11]

    Piotr Bojanowski, Edouard Grave, Armand Joulin, and Tomas Mikolov. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00051 Enriching word vectors with subword information . Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5:135--146

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    Jill Carrier-Duncan. 1985. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178418 Linking of thematic roles in derivational word formation . Linguistic Inquiry, 16(1):1--34

    1985

  5. [13]

    Alexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary, Guillaume Wenzek, Francisco Guzm \'a n, Edouard Grave, Myle Ott, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.747 Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning ...

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    Jan Christian Blaise Cruz and Charibeth Cheng. 2022. https://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.703 Improving large-scale language models and resources for F ilipino . In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 6548--6555, Marseille, France....

    2022

  7. [15]

    Ernesto H. Cubar. 1975. Topicalization and Some Related Processes in Philippine Languages. University of the Philippines Department of Linguistics. Reprinted in The Archive Classics (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    V. P. De Guzman. 1978. Syntactic Derivation of Tagalog Verbs. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu

    1978

  9. [17]

    Manning, Joakim Nivre, and Daniel Zeman

    Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Christopher D. Manning, Joakim Nivre, and Daniel Zeman. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00402 U niversal D ependencies . Computational Linguistics, 47(2):255--308

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Fiona de Vos. 2010. Essential Tagalog Grammar: A Reference for Learners of Tagalog. Learning Tagalog

    2010

  11. [19]

    Mathieu Dehouck and Pascal Denis. 2019. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1017 Phylogenic multi-lingual dependency parsing . In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North A merican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume...

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    Peter Dirix, Liesbeth Augustinus, Daniel van Niekerk, and Frank Van Eynde. 2017. https://aclanthology.org/W17-0405/ U niversal D ependencies for A frikaans . In Proceedings of the N o D a L i D a 2017 Workshop on Universal Dependencies ( UDW 2017) , pages 38--47, Gothenburg, S...

    2017

  13. [21]

    Timothy Dozat, Peng Qi, and Christopher D. Manning. 2017. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K17-3002 S tanford ' s graph-based neural dependency parser at the C o NLL 2017 shared task . In Proceedings of the C o NLL 2017 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal D...

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Dryer and Martin Haspelmath

    Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. 2013. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13950591 WALS Online (v2020.4) . Data set

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Amy Yang, Angela Fan, et al. 2024. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Eberhard, Gary F

    David M. Eberhard, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig, editors. 2024. http://www.ethnologue.com Ethnologue: Languages of the World , 27 edition. SIL International, Dallas, Texas

    2024

  17. [25]

    Leo James English. 1986. Tagalog-English dictionary. Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer Manila

    1986

  18. [26]

    William Foley. 2008. The place of philippine languages in a typology of voice systems. In P. K. Austin and S. Musgraves, editors, Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, pages 22--44. CSLI Publications

    2008

  19. [27]

    Kar \"e n Fort. 2016. Collaborative Annotation for Reliable Natural Language Processing: Technical and Sociological Aspects. John Wiley & Sons

    2016

  20. [28]

    Dirk Goldhahn, Thomas Eckart, and Uwe Quasthoff. 2012. https://aclanthology.org/L12-1154/ Building large monolingual dictionaries at the L eipzig corpora collection: From 100 to 200 languages . In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Eva...

    2012

  21. [29]

    Pengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, and Weizhu Chen. 2021. https://openreview.net/forum?id=XPZIaotutsD DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attention . In International Conference on Learning Representations

    2021

  22. [30]

    Santiago Herrera, Caio Corro, and Sylvain Kahane. 2024. https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.1314/ Sparse logistic regression with high-order features for automatic grammar rule extraction from treebanks . In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computa...

    2024

  23. [31]

    u r Sprachwissenschaft, Universit \

    Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 1991. The Philippine Challenge to Universal Grammar . Number N.F. 15 in Arbeitspapier / Institut f \"u r Sprachwissenschaft, Universit \"a t K \"o ln

    1991

  24. [32]

    Himmelmann

    Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2005. Tagalog. In K. Alexander Adelaar and Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, editors, The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, 1st edition, page 27. Routledge

    2005

  25. [33]

    Himmelmann

    Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2007. Lexical categories and voice in tagalog. In P. K. Austin and S. Musgrave, editors, Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, pages 247--293

    2007

  26. [34]

    Matthew Honnibal and Mark Johnson. 2015. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D15-1162 An improved non-monotonic transition system for dependency parsing . In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1373--1378, Lisbon, Portugal. Ass...

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    Matthew Honnibal, Ines Montani, Sofie Van Landeghem, and Adriane Boyd. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1212303 spaCy: Industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    Jem R Javier and Elsie Marie T Or. 2022. Tagalog linguistics: Historical development and theoretical trends. In The Routledge Handbook of Asian Linguistics, pages 33--46. Routledge

    2022

  29. [37]

    Pratik Joshi, Sebastin Santy, Amar Budhiraja, Kalika Bali, and Monojit Choudhury. 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.560 The state and fate of linguistic diversity and inclusion in the NLP world . In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Co...

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Hiroshi Kanayama and Ran Iwamoto. 2020. https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.500/ How universal are U niversal D ependencies? exploiting syntax for multilingual clause-level sentiment detection . In Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages...

    2020

  31. [39]

    Daniel Kaufman. 2009. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/THLI.2009.001 Austronesian nominalism and its consequences: A tagalog case study . Theoretical Linguistics, 35(1):1--49

    2009 doi

  32. [40]

    Dan Kondratyuk and Milan Straka. 2019. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1279 75 languages, 1 model: Parsing U niversal D ependencies universally . In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conferenc...

    2019 doi

  33. [41]

    Paul Kroeger. 1993. Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Center for the Study of Language (CSLI)

    1993

  34. [42]

    Shalom Lappin. 2024. Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of large language models. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 33(1):9--20

    2024

  35. [43]

    Percy Liang, Michael Jordan, and Dan Klein. 2011. https://aclanthology.org/P11-1060/ Learning dependency-based compositional semantics . In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 590--599, Por...

    2011

  36. [44]

    Mary L McHugh. 2012. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia medica, 22(3):276--282

    2012

  37. [45]

    Lester James Miranda. 2023 a . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.nlposs-1.1 calaman C y: A T agalog natural language processing toolkit . In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop for Natural Language Processing Open Source Software (NLP-OSS 2023), pages 1--7, Singapore. Association f...

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    Lester James Miranda. 2023 b . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.sealp-1.2 Developing a named entity recognition dataset for T agalog . In Proceedings of the First Workshop in South East Asian Language Processing, pages 13--20, Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia. Association for Computa...

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    Lester James Miranda, \'A kos K \'a d \'a r, Adriane Boyd, Sofie Van Landeghem, Anders S gaard, and Matthew Honnibal. 2022. Multi hash embeddings in spacy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09255

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Kadri Muischnek, Kaili M \"u \"u risep, and Tiina Puolakainen. 2016. https://aclanthology.org/L16-1247/ E stonian dependency treebank: from constraint grammar tagset to U niversal D ependencies . In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Ev...

    2016

  41. [49]

    u ller, Ryan Cotterell, Alexander Fraser, and Hinrich Sch \

    Thomas M \"u ller, Ryan Cotterell, Alexander Fraser, and Hinrich Sch \"u tze. 2015. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D15-1272 Joint lemmatization and morphological tagging with lemming . In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, page...

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    Manning, Sampo Pyysalo, Sebastian Schuster, Francis Tyers, and Daniel Zeman

    Joakim Nivre, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Filip Ginter, Jan Haji c , Christopher D. Manning, Sampo Pyysalo, Sebastian Schuster, Francis Tyers, and Daniel Zeman. 2020. https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.497 U niversal D ependencies v2: An evergrowing multilingual treebank co...

    2020

  43. [51]

    Timothy Osborne and Kim Gerdes. 2019. The status of function words in dependency grammar: A critique of universal dependencies (ud). Glossa: a journal of general linguistics (2016-2021)

    2019

  44. [52]

    2020 census of population and housing report no

    Philippine Statistics Authority . 2020 census of population and housing report no. 21 - demographic and housing characteristics (non-sample variables). Retrieved from https://library.psa.gov.ph/

    2020

  45. [53]

    Peng Qi, Yuhao Zhang, Yuhui Zhang, Jason Bolton, and Christopher D. Manning. 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-demos.14 S tanza: A python natural language processing toolkit for many human languages . In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Co...

    2020 doi

  46. [54]

    Uwe Quasthoff and Matthias Richter. 1998. Projekt Der Deutsche Wortschatz. na

    1998

  47. [55]

    Andrea Rackowski and Norvin Richards. 2005. Phrase edge and extraction: A tagalog case study. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(4):565--599

    2005

  48. [56]

    Ria P. Rafael. 2016. Sinong pasimuno? paggamit ng subject at topic sa pag-aaral ng wika' (who's the initiator? the use of subject and topic in language studies). Daluyan: Journal ng Wikang Filipino, 22(1/2):165--180

    2016

  49. [57]

    Lawrence Reid. 2005. Tagalog and philippine languages. In Philipp Skutch, editor, Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Routledge, New York

    2005

  50. [58]

    Himmelmann

    Sonja Riesberg, Kurt Malcher, and Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0055 How universal is agent-first? evidence from symmetrical voice languages . Language, 95(3):523--561

    2019

  51. [59]

    Michael J Ryan, William Held, and Diyi Yang. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.853 Unintended impacts of LLM alignment on global representation . In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), p...

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    Stephanie Dawn Samson. 2018. A treebank prototype of Tagalog . Bachelor's thesis, University of T \"u bingen, Germany

    2018

  53. [61]

    Paul Schachter. 1976. The subject in philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above. In Charles Li, editor, Subject and Topic, pages 491--518. Academic Press, New York

    1976

  54. [62]

    Paul Schachter and Fe T. Otanes. 1972. Tagalog Reference Grammar. University of California Press

    1972

  55. [63]

    Milan Straka, Jan Haji c , and Jana Strakov \'a . 2016. https://aclanthology.org/L16-1680 UDP ipe: Trainable pipeline for processing C o NLL - U files performing tokenization, morphological analysis, POS tagging and parsing . In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conferenc...

    2016

  56. [64]

    Roberto D Tangco and Ricardo Ma Nolasco. 2002. ‘taglish’verbs: How english loanwords make it into the philippine languages. In Tenth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, pages 391--406

    2002

  57. [65]

    Simone Tedeschi, Valentino Maiorca, Niccol \`o Campolungo, Francesco Cecconi, and Roberto Navigli. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.215 W iki NE u R al: C ombined neural and knowledge-based silver data creation for multilingual NER . In Findings of the Ass...

    2021 doi

  58. [66]

    Jianwei Wang, Tianyin Wang, and Ziqian Zeng. 2024. https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.1088/ On the use of silver standard data for zero-shot classification tasks in information extraction . In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguis...

    2024

  59. [67]

    Xin Zhang, Yanzhao Zhang, Dingkun Long, Wen Xie, Ziqi Dai, Jialong Tang, Huan Lin, Baosong Yang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, et al. 2024. mgte: Generalized long-context text representation and reranking models for multilingual text retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference ...

    2024

  60. [68]

    Zhisong Zhang, Emma Strubell, and Eduard Hovy. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.414 A survey of active learning for natural language processing . In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 6166--6190, Abu D...

    2022 doi

  61. [69]

    online" 'onlinestring :=

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint eprinttype howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year doi pubmed url lastchecked label extra.label sort.label short.list...

  62. [70]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.