Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Metallic layered materials with magnetic frustration: An ARPES view of the SmAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ and TbAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Through ARPES and DFT, this paper establishes that SmAuAl4Ge2 and TbAuAl4Ge2 have quasi-2D Fermi surfaces well captured by the non-magnetic analogue YAuAl4Ge2, with TbAuAl4Ge2 showing an exchange-split near-Fermi-level structure caused by…

desk verdict A solid ARPES characterization of two frustrated magnets whose central Fermi-surface description stands, but the exchange-splitting attribution for Tb is not supported by the temperature dependence and needs revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.20544 v1 pith:EKIZQ75A submitted 2025-05-26 cond-mat.str-el

P. Rezende-Gonçalves , A. Antezak , T. Kato , K. Feng , F. Fortuna , P. Le Fèvre , M. Rosmus , N. Olszowska
show 5 more authors
T. Sobol D. J. Singh R. E. Baumbach A. F. Santander-Syro E. Frantzeskakis
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 71.18.+y79.60.-i71.20.-b
keywords ARPESFermisurfacemagneticfrustrationf-electronhybridizationlanthanideintermetallicsspin-orbitcouplingterminationquasi-2Delectronicstructure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish the experimental electronic structure of two members of a new family of layered, geometrically frustrated magnets, SmAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ and TbAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$, and to determine how their localized $4f$ moments affect that structure. Using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy together with density functional theory, it claims that both compounds have a quasi-two-dimensional Fermi surface built from three hole pockets around $\bar{\Gamma}$ and three electron pockets around $\bar{M}$, and that this surface is well reproduced by the non-magnetic analogue YAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$, confirming negligible hybridization between $f$ and conduction electrons. The paper further claims that in TbAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ the near-Fermi-level bands are doubled and the Fermi sheets split, an effect that can only be accounted for by including the localized Tb moments through exchange interaction combined with spin-orbit coupling. It also identifies the cleavage plane as the Al(1) layer and shows that surface-localized states appear in well-ordered regions.

What carries the argument

The central comparison object is the non-magnetic analogue YAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$: the paper replaces the lanthanide with yttrium in density functional theory calculations, so that the near-$E_F$ band structure can be computed without $4f$ states masking it. The mechanism carrying the main physics claim is the exchange-splitting calculation for TbAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$, where a ferromagnetic Tb ordering is imposed within DFT$+U$ (with $U=7$ eV and spin-orbit coupling), producing spin and orbital moments consistent with the Tb $f^8$ shell; the resulting split Fermi sheets are directly compared with the measured doubled bands. A second piece of machinery is the slab calculation: six-layer YAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ slabs with different terminations, one of them being an Au layer with an Al monolayer on top, are used to match the measured surface states and to identify the Al(1) cleavage plane.

What would settle it

Spin-resolved ARPES on TbAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ below its ordering temperature would settle the claim: if the measured spin polarization of the doubled near-$E_F$ bands does not match the exchange-split bands computed for the imposed ferromagnetic Tb ordering, the attribution to bulk exchange splitting fails. Alternatively, recomputing the band structure with the experimentally reported antiferromagnetic or multi-$k$ magnetic configuration and checking whether it reproduces the split Fermi sheets would directly test the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, on the paper's own terms, is that the $f$ electrons in this material family act on the Fermi surface only through their spin degree of freedom. The ARPES Fermi surface maps and dispersions of SmAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ and TbAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ match the density functional theory band structure of the non-magnetic YAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ except for one notable detail: in TbAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$, each hole-like band near $E_F$ appears doubled and each Fermi sheet is split. Because a calculation that places a ferromagnetic Tb moment, with spin-orbit coupling included, reproduces this splitting while the Y calculation does not, the paper concludes that exchange coupling between conduction-electron spins and the localized $4f$ moments, together with spin-orbit coupling, is the mechanism. The $f$ electrons thus hybridize negligibly with the conduction bands yet still modify the Fermi surface indirectly, a distinction the paper argues is useful for interpreting the family's complex magnetism.

Load-bearing premise

The exchange-splitting result that anchors the paper's most novel claim is computed with a ferromagnetic Tb ordering, even though the actual compound undergoes a complex double magnetic transition; if the true magnetic configuration produces a different exchange field, the predicted splitting pattern and its attribution to bulk exchange would be weakened.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For this materials family, band-structure models can use the non-magnetic Y analogue to describe the Fermi surface, since the $f$ electrons do not hybridize appreciably with the conduction bands.
  • TbAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ serves as a concrete example where localized moments alter the Fermi surface and conduction properties without Kondo-type hybridization.
  • The quasi-2D Fermi surface with multiple hole and electron pockets is consistent with the good metallic transport reported for both compounds and gives a band-structure basis for interpreting their field-induced magnetic states.
  • Because the exchange splitting is a bulk effect, its absence in rougher surface regions reflects surface disorder rather than a change in the intrinsic electronic structure.
  • The identification of the Al(1) termination and its surface states provides a reference for future photoemission and scanning-probe experiments on this layered family.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The exchange-splitting pattern should depend on the direction and magnitude of the Tb moment; ARPES across the 13.9 K and 9.8 K magnetic transitions, or under an applied magnetic field, could test whether the observed splittings track the evolving magnetic order.
  • If the mechanism is generic, other members of the LnAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ family with ordered localized moments, such as the Gd compound, should show similar doubled Fermi sheets in their magnetically ordered states despite negligible $f$ hybridization.
  • The coexistence of well-ordered Al(1)-terminated regions with rougher Au-like regions suggests that macroscopic transport may include surface contributions, and that micro-focused photoemission or scanning tunneling microscopy could resolve the intrinsic surface state S1 that the present slab calculations do not reproduce.
  • Spin-resolved ARPES would directly visualize the exchange-split majority and minority spin channels that the ferromagnetic calculation predicts, providing a sharper test of the proposed mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an ARPES study of SmAuAl4Ge2 and TbAuAl4Ge2, two members of a frustrated triangular-lattice lanthanide family. It shows that their measured Fermi surfaces consist of three hole pockets around Γ̄ and three electron pockets around M̄, with quasi-2D character established by photon-energy-dependent ARPES and MDC analysis, and that these features are well reproduced by PBE-GGA band calculations of the non-magnetic analogue YAuAl4Ge2. The paper further assigns the dominant cleavage surface to the Al(1) termination by comparing ARPES and core-level data with slab calculations. Finally, it attributes a near-EF doubling of bands observed in TbAuAl4Ge2 to exchange splitting from the localized Tb 4f moments combined with spin-orbit coupling, based on a DFT+U calculation with ferromagnetic Tb ordering.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides the first detailed ARPES view of two compounds in a family of frustrated magnets, establishing weak f-conduction hybridization and a strongly two-dimensional Fermi surface, and identifying the cleavage plane. The use of an independent bulk DFT calculation of a non-magnetic analogue as a comparison standard, rather than fits to the ARPES data, is a strength. However, the most novel claim, the exchange-splitting origin of the band doubling, rests on a calculation for a ferromagnetic configuration that is not the experimental ground state and is not directly tested by the temperature-dependent data. This claim therefore needs additional support or recalibration before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [II C and III C] The exchange-splitting attribution in Sec. III C relies on a DFT+U calculation performed with a ferromagnetic Tb ordering (Sec. II C), whereas the actual TbAuAl4Ge2 ground state is reported to involve a complex double magnetic transition at 13.9 K and 9.8 K (Refs. 23,24). The ARPES maps showing the doubled bands (Figs. 4(a) and 5(a)) were acquired at 16 K, above both transitions, and the temperature-dependent data in Figs. 2(d)-(e) show no change in the near-EF structure between 16 K and 8 K. A static exchange field from the assumed ferromagnetic order is therefore an untested stand-in for the real magnetic configuration. To support the claim, the authors should either perform calculations with the reported magnetic order (or a set of plausible configurations) and show that the splitting pattern is robust, or provide an explicit argument for why the exchange field is insensitive to the magnetic structure. Without this, the statement that the doubling 'can only be explained by the inclusion of the magnetic moments' is not justified.
  2. [III C] The data in Figs. 5(a)-5(d) show that the doubled near-EF bands are observed only in region A and not in region B, yet the text states that the splitting is a bulk effect 'and should be present all over the cleavage surface.' The explanation that rougher regions obscure details is not quantitatively supported; if the splitting were a bulk exchange effect of the size visible in Fig. 5(c), it should survive at least in some form in region B. The paper should address this internal inconsistency, for example by comparing MDC fits in both regions at the same emission angles and energies, or by demonstrating that the roughness in region B is sufficient to destroy the bulk coherence. Alternatively, if the splitting is surface-sensitive, the bulk exchange interpretation is weakened.
  3. [III A] The temperature-dependent ARPES in Figs. 2(d)-(e) shows no change across the 13.9 K and 9.8 K magnetic transitions. The authors dismiss this with the argument that replica intensities are low and any gap is below resolution, but this argument applies to a new periodicity or band folding, not to the exchange splitting that is the subject of Sec. III C. If the exchange splitting were caused by the ordered moments, one would expect it to appear or grow below the ordering temperature. The paper needs to either explain why the splitting is temperature-independent in a static exchange-field picture, or present additional data (e.g., high-resolution spectra across the transition) that test this expectation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II B] The statement that measurements were performed at temperatures not higher than 20 K should specify which data sets correspond to 16 K and which to 8 K, since the temperature comparison in Figs. 2(d)-(e) is central to the discussion.
  2. [III A] The discussion of the innermost state's potential out-of-plane dispersion would benefit from showing the full kz map with the closed contour extracted, as the current Fig. 3(c) is difficult to evaluate due to intensity variations.
  3. [III B] The S1 feature at the Fermi level is not reproduced by either slab calculation; the text dismisses this with a reference to the f-electron DOS, but the possibility of a Tb-derived state or many-body effect should be discussed more explicitly.
  4. [III C] The phrase 'This is no surprising' should read 'This is not surprising.'
  5. [Fig. 3 caption] The captions for panels (g) and (h) do not list the photon energies for panel (h); please add them for completeness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: ARPES and DFT comparison is external; termination and exchange-splitting assignments are model comparisons rather than fits.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (quasi-2D Fermi surface with three hole pockets around Γ-bar and three electron pockets around M-bar, captured by the non-magnetic analogue YAuAl4Ge2) is established by comparing ARPES maps (Figs. 1(d)-(e), 2(a)-(b), 3) with bulk DFT calculations of YAuAl4Ge2 (Figs. 1(c), 2(c), 3(f)) that were performed independently and contain no ARPES-derived parameters. The termination assignment (Al(1) layer, Sec. III B) is a discrete model comparison: the experimental S2 feature at K-bar matches the Al(1)-on-Au slab (Fig. 4(d)) and not the Au-terminated slab (Fig. 4(c)); this is hypothesis selection, not fitting. The exchange-splitting attribution (Sec. III C) is supported by a DFT+U calculation with ferromagnetic Tb ordering (Sec. II C) whose input (U=7 eV, ordered Tb moments) is not fitted to the observed band doubling; the splitting in Fig. 5(e) is an output of the calculation, and the absence of splitting in the Y analogue (Fig. 5(f)) provides a controlled comparison. The self-citations to Refs. 22-24 (prior work by some of the same authors) are used only for the known magnetic transition temperatures and lattice parameters, which are external experimental facts and are not the basis of the paper's derivation. The possible mismatch between the assumed ferromagnetic Tb order and the actual complex magnetic ground state is a physical validity concern, not a circularity. No equation or fitted parameter is recycled as a prediction, so no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's claims rest on a modest number of standard domain assumptions: the accuracy of PBE-GGA for these metallic bands, the transferability of the Y proxy, a stated-but-unverified photon-energy to kz mapping, and the adequacy of six-layer slabs. The only ad hoc input tied to the novel physics claim is the ferromagnetic ordering of Tb moments used to compute the exchange-split Fermi surface, which is not the experimentally determined magnetic structure. One hand-chosen parameter (U = 7 eV) enters the Tb calculation. No invented entities are introduced. The load on assumptions is typical for ARPES plus DFT work, with the FM-ordering assumption being the most consequential.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard U (Tb 4f) = 7 eV
    Chosen by hand in Sec. II C using the PBE+U fully localized limit. It localizes the Tb f-states at 10 to 5 eV binding and sets the exchange field that produces the split Fermi surface in Fig. 5(e); the near-EF comparison to Y is largely insensitive to it, but the exchange-splitting claim inherits its value.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA Kohn-Sham bands of YAuAl4Ge2 accurately represent the near-EF bands of the real compounds
    The central comparison in Sec. III A treats the calculated band structure of Fig. 2(c) and the Fermi surface of Fig. 1(c) as the reference for the ARPES data. PBE-GGA is known to describe such metallic bands well, but it is an approximation without an error estimate.
  • domain assumption Y is a faithful proxy for Sm and Tb in the near-EF electronic structure
    Secs. II C and III A replace Sm/Tb with Y since 'the lanthanide atom is not expected to affect the crystal structure', and the DOS 'show no differences with the lanthanide analogues' (SI1). The experimental agreement partly justifies this, but it is an asserted chemical transferability rather than a demonstrated equivalence.
  • domain assumption The photon-energy-to-kz mapping (inner potential) is such that the probed kz range covers the relevant part of the 3D Brillouin zone
    Sec. III A concludes the states are 2D from the absence of dispersion between 70-150 eV photons; the inner potential used for the kz assignment is not stated.
  • ad hoc to paper A ferromagnetic Tb configuration captures the exchange field of the real complex magnetic ground state
    Sec. II C: the split Fermi surface of Fig. 5(e) and the band doubling claimed in Sec. III C are computed with 'a ferromagnetic Tb ordering', while the actual compound orders through a double transition at 13.9 K and 9.8 K with complex spin arrangements (Refs. 23, 24). No alternative magnetic configuration is tested.
  • domain assumption Six-layer slab models with added vacuum capture the surface electronic structure relevant to the termination identification
    Secs. II C and III B: the Al(1)-termination conclusion rests on matching slab bands to ARPES; the authors note finite-thickness artifacts ('faint lines between these three main sets of bulk bands'), and the S1 feature is not reproduced.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Metallic layered materials with magnetic frustration: An ARPES view of the SmAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ and TbAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EKIZQ75A

@misc{pith2026250520544,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Metallic layered materials with magnetic frustration: An ARPES view of the SmAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ and TbAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EKIZQ75A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.20544}
}
abstract

Compounds of the new materials class LnTAl$_4$X$_2$ (Ln = lanthanide, X = tetrel, T = transition metal) host exotic magnetic phenomena due to geometric frustration induced by their triangular lattice. Complex spin arrangements, magnetic fluctuations and double magnetic transitions have been well observed by means of magneto-transport. Nevertheless, the experimental electronic structure of this family of materials has been poorly studied. We have investigated the experimental electronic structure of two members of this class of materials: SmAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$ and TbAuAl$_4$Ge$_2$. By means of Angle-Resolved PhotoEmission Spectroscopy (ARPES) accompanied by Density Functional Theory calculations (DFT), we reveal common trends and features, the important effect of localized spin moments on the electronic structure, the presence of surface-localized electronic states and the nature of the surface termination layer. Low-dimensionality, exchange interaction, and spin-orbit coupling are all important ingredients of the electronic structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.20544 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) ARPES energy-momentum map of SmAuAl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a),(b) ARPES energy-momentum map of SmAuAl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a),(b) ARPES energy-momentum maps of TbAuAl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a), (b) Energy-momentum dispersions along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    acknowledges Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Re- search (JSPS KAKENHI Grant No

    T.K. acknowledges Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Re- search (JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. JP23KJ0099) and support from GP-Spin at Tohoku University. R.B. and K.F. were supported by the National Science Foundation through Grant No. DMR-1904361

    work page

  2. [2]

    Kondo, Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys, Prog

    J. Kondo, Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys, Prog. Theor. Phys. 32, 37 (1964)

    1964

  3. [3]

    M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, Indirect exchange cou- pling of nuclear magnetic moments by conduction elec- trons, Phys. Rev. 96, 99 (1954)

    1954

  4. [4]

    Pr¨ user, P

    H. Pr¨ user, P. E. Dargel, M. Bouhassoune, R. G. Ul- brich, T. Pruschke, S. Lounis, and M. Wenderoth, Interplay between the Kondo effect and the Ruder- man–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida interaction, Nat. Commun. 5, 5417 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    J. R. Iglesias, C. Lacroix, and B. Coqblin, Revisited Do- niach diagram: Influence of short-range antiferromag- netic correlations in the Kondo lattice, Phys. Rev. B 56, 11820 (1997)

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    The Future of the Correlated Electron Problem

    A. Alexandradinata, N. P. Armitage, A. Baydin, W. Bi, Y. Cao, H. J. Changlani, E. Chertkov, E. H. d. S. Neto, L. Delacretaz, I. E. Baggari, G. M. Ferguson, W. J. Gannon, S. A. A. Ghorashi, B. H. Goodge, O. Goulko, G. Grissonnanche, A. Hallas, I. M. Hayes, Y. He, E. W. Huang, A. Kogar, D. Kumah, J. Y. Lee, A. Legros, F. Mahmood, Y. Maximenko, N. Pellatz, H...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    Coleman and A

    P. Coleman and A. H. Nevidomskyy, Frustration and the Kondo effect in heavy fermion materials, J. Low Temp. Phys. 161, 182 (2010). 11

    work page 2010

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    G. H. Wannier, Antiferromagnetism. the triangular Ising net, Phys. Rev. 79, 357 (1950)

    1950

  2. [10]

    Nomoto and R

    T. Nomoto and R. Arita, Cluster multipole dynamics in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 012045 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    F. Lu, L. Yuan, J. Zhang, B. Li, Y. Luo, and Y. Li, The observation of quantum fluctuations in a kagome Heisen- berg antiferromagnet, Commun. Phys. 5, 272 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    M. R. Norman, Colloquium: Herbertsmithite and the search for the quantum spin liquid, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 041002 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Taguchi, Y

    Y. Taguchi, Y. Oohara, H. Yoshizawa, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Spin chirality, Berry phase, and anomalous Hall effect in a frustrated ferromagnet, Science 291, 2573 (2001)

    2001

  6. [14]

    Taguchi, T

    Y. Taguchi, T. Sasaki, S. Awaji, Y. Iwasa, T. Tayama, T. Sakakibara, S. Iguchi, T. Ito, and Y. Tokura, Magnetic field induced sign reversal of the anomalous Hall effect in a pyrochlore ferromagnet Nd2Mo2O7: Evidence for a spin chirality mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 257202 (2003)

    2003

  7. [15]

    Castelnovo, R

    C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Magnetic monopoles in spin ice, Nature 451, 42 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    R. F. Wang, C. Nisoli, R. S. Freitas, J. Li, W. McConville, B. J. Cooley, M. S. Lund, N. Samarth, C. Leighton, V. H. Crespi, and P. Schiffer, Artificial ‘spin ice’ in a geometri- cally frustrated lattice of nanoscale ferromagnetic islands, Nature 439, 303 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Fritsch, N

    V. Fritsch, N. Bagrets, G. Goll, W. Kittler, M. J. Wolf, K. Grube, C.-L. Huang, and H. V. L¨ ohneysen, Approach- ing quantum criticality in a partially geometrically frus- trated heavy-fermion metal, Phys. Rev. B 89, 054416 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    Sengupta, M

    K. Sengupta, M. K. Forthaus, H. Kubo, K. Katoh, K. Umeo, T. Takabatake, and M. M. Abd-Elmeguid, Ge- ometrical frustration versus magnetic order in the heavy- fermion antiferromagnet YbAgGe under high pressure, Phys. Rev. B 81, 125129 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    Tokiwa, C

    Y. Tokiwa, C. Stingl, M.-S. Kim, T. Takabatake, and P. Gegenwart, Characteristic signatures of quantum crit- icality driven by geometrical frustration, Sci. Adv. 1, e1500001 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    M. Cong, H. Ge, L. Zhang, W. Ren, N. Zhao, T. Li, S. Wang, J. Zhu, J. Mei, Q. Zhang, J. Sheng, F. Gao, B. Li, Z. Zhang, and L. Wu, Magnetic phase dia- gram and multiple field-induced states in the intermetal- lic triangular-lattice antiferromagnet NdAuAl 4Ge2 with Ising-like s...

    2023

  13. [21]

    Zhang, N

    S. Zhang, N. Aryal, K. Huang, K.-W. Chen, Y. Lai, D. Graf, T. Besara, T. Siegrist, E. Manousakis, and R. E. Baumbach, Electronic structure and magnetism in the layered triangular lattice compound CeAuAl 4Ge2, Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 044404 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    K. Feng, J. R. G. Cabral, K. Wei, and R. Baumbach, Re- vealing complex spin states in GdNiAl 4Ge2, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 124409 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    K. Feng, C. Bush, O. Oladehin, M. Lee, and R. Baum- bach, Complex antiferromagnetic order in the metallic triangular lattice compound SmAuAl 4Ge2, Phys. Rev. B 109, 014436 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    K. Feng, I. A. Leahy, O. Oladehin, K. Wei, M. Lee, and R. Baumbach, Magnetic ordering in GdAuAl 4Ge2 and TbAuAl4Ge2: Layered compounds with triangular lan- thanide nets, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 564, 170006 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    I. A. Leahy, K. Feng, R. Dery, R. Baumbach, and M. Lee, Field-induced magnetic states in the metallic rare-earth layered triangular antiferromagnet TbAuAl 4Ge2, Phys. Rev. B 106, 094426 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y. Wang, F. Zhang, H. Rong, Y. Cai, L. Wang, X.-M. Ma, S. Guo, Z. Chen, Y. Wang, Z. Jiang, Y. Yang, Z. Liu, M. Ye, J. Lin, J. Mei, Z. Hao, Z. Xie, and C. Chen, Multiple surface states, nontrivial band topology, and an- tiferromagnetism in GdAuAl 4Ge2, Chinese Phys. B...

    2023

  19. [27]

    Wu and M

    X. Wu and M. G. Kanatzidis, REAuAl 4Ge2 and REAuAl4(AuxGe1−x)2 (RE=rare earth element): Qua- ternary intermetallics grown in liquid aluminum, J. Solid State Chem. 178, 3233 (2005)

    2005

  20. [28]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  21. [29]

    D. J. Singh and L. Nordstrom, Planewaves, Pseudopo- tentials, and the LAPW Method (Springer, 2005)

    2005

  22. [30]

    Blaha, K

    P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, F. Tran, R. Laskowski, G. K. H. Madsen, and L. D. Marks, WIEN2k: An APW+lo pro- gram for calculating the properties of solids, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 074101 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- tra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  24. [32]

    Zhang, P

    P. Zhang, P. Richard, T. Qian, Y.-M. Xu, X. Dai, and H. Ding, A precise method for visualizing dispersive features in image plots, Ver. Sci. Instrum. 824, 43712 (2011)

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.