Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

The Extreme Universe Observatory on a Super-Pressure Balloon II: Mission, Payload, and Flight

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A balloon mission cut to 37 hours still recorded about 10 cosmic-ray air-shower candidates from near space.

desk verdict Solid mission report with a genuinely preliminary candidate claim: the engineering is citable, but the 'about 10 events' headline should wait for the companion analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.20762 v1 pith:5UYUNZW2 submitted 2025-05-27 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IM

James.H. Adams Jr. , Denis Allard , Phillip Alldredge , Luis Anchordoqui , Anna Anzalone , Mahdi Bagheri , Matteo Battisti , Roberto Bellotti
show 91 more authors
Alexander Belov Mario Bertaina Peter Bertone Sylvie Blin-Bondil Jordan Bogdan Julia Burton Heigbes Francis Cafagna Rosella Caruso Marco Casolino Karel Černý Mark J. Christl Roberta Colalillo Hank J. Crawford Alexandre Creusot Austin Cummings Julia Desiato Rebecca Diesing Alessandro Di Nola Toshikazu Ebisuzaki Johannes Eser Francesco Fenu Silvia Ferrarese George Filippat{o}s William W. Finch Flavia Flaminio S. Flannery Claudio Fornaro Noah Friedlander Duncan Fuehne Christer Fuglesang Srikar Gadamsetty Diksha Garg Eleanor Gazda Alessio Golzio Fausto Guarino Claire Guépin Tobias Heibges Eleanor G. Judd Luke Kupari Pavel A. Klimov John F. Krizmanic Viktoria Kungel Evgeny Kuznetsov Marco Mignone Massimiliano Manfrin Wlodzimierz Marsza{l} John N. Matthews Kameron Mehling Marco Mese Stephan S. Meyer Hiroko Miyamoto Alexey S. Murashov Jane M. Nachtman Angela V. Olinto Yasar Onel Giuseppe Osteria A. Nepomuk Otte Beatrice Panico Etienne Parizot Tom Paul Miroslav Pech Francesco Perfetto Lech W. Piotrowski Zbigniew Plebaniak Jonatan Posligua Matthew Potts Guillaume Prévôt M. Przybylak Pat Reardon Mary Hall Reno Marco Ricci Oscar F. Romero Matamala Fred Sarazin Petr Schovánek Viktoria Scotti Kenji Shinozaki Jorge F. Soriano S. Stephanoff Patrick Sternberg Ben K. Stillwell Jacek Szabelski Yoshiyuki Takizawa Daniil Trofimov Fredrik Unel Valerio Vagelli Laura Valore Tonia M. Venters John Watts Jr. Lawrence Wiencke Hannah Wistrand Roy Young
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM
keywords ultra-high-energycosmicraysextensiveairshowersCherenkovtelescopefluorescencesuper-pressureballoonbi-focaltriggerEUSO-SPB2neutrinotarget-of-opportunity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports on EUSO-SPB2, a balloon-borne pair of telescopes meant to test techniques for a future orbital observatory that would study ultra-high-energy cosmic rays and very-high-energy neutrinos. The planned long-duration flight was cut short: a leaking balloon forced termination after 36 hours 52 minutes. Even so, the paper argues that all instruments were successfully commissioned, and that the Cherenkov telescope recorded about 10 candidate extensive-air-shower events from cosmic rays during 45 minutes of observing above Earth's limb. The fluorescence telescope saw no ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray events, which the paper says is consistent with the 0 to 2 events expected for its shortened exposure. If the candidate identifications hold, this establishes the first near-space detection of cosmic-ray air showers through Cherenkov light and validates the instrument chain for a longer-duration successor.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the bi-focal trigger. The Cherenkov telescope's four mirror segments are aligned so that parallel light from a distant source forms two spots separated by 12 mm, twice a pixel width, on the 512-pixel silicon-photomultiplier camera; an air-shower Cherenkov flash illuminates both spots with time-correlated pulses, whereas night-sky background fluctuations and individual charged-particle hits tend to produce single-spot or uncorrelated signals. The trigger requires a discriminator signal in one group of pixels and a laterally adjacent signal within 50 ns, and then records 5.12-microsecond traces digitized at 100 megasamples per second. The fluorescence telescope uses a complementary mechanism, a track-finding trigger that looks for 2x2 groups of pixels above threshold in three consecutive 1-microsecond time bins.

What would settle it

A full Monte Carlo of night-sky background and charged-particle hits, run through the Cherenkov telescope's trigger chain and compared event-by-event with the 2,893 triggers, that reproduces the observed two-spot rate without air showers would falsify the claim that the about 10 candidates are cosmic rays.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a near-space Cherenkov telescope can identify cosmic-ray-induced extensive air showers by their direct Cherenkov light, even on a short and prematurely terminated balloon flight. During 45 minutes with the Cherenkov telescope pointed 3 degrees above Earth's limb at about 33 km altitude, 2,893 bi-focal triggers were recorded, and about 10 of these were identified as high-energy cosmic-ray candidates with time-correlated signals in the two focal-plane spots and light levels well above background. The paper also reports that the fluorescence telescope collected 99,682 triggered events and found no track-like air-shower candidates, a null result the authors say is consistent with the predicted 0 to 2 events for the abbreviated exposure. The mission is therefore presented as an in-situ commissioning of both telescopes, the solar power system, and a high-bandwidth balloon telemetry link, with the Cherenkov detections supporting the expectation that the same instrument pointed below the limb would be sensitive to Earth-skimming tau-neutrino showers.

Load-bearing premise

That the roughly ten Cherenkov events are truly air showers rests on the assumption that a two-spot, time-correlated flash cannot be produced often enough by night-sky background or by charged particles striking the camera; the full background model and event-selection details are deferred to a later paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The above-limb Cherenkov observation demonstrates that a 1-meter-class Schmidt telescope at balloon altitude can record air-shower light signatures, which is the same detection channel a future orbital neutrino observatory would use for Earth-skimming tau neutrinos.
  • The fluorescence telescope's null result, with about 100,000 triggers and no air-shower candidates, is consistent with the 0 to 2 events expected for the shortened exposure, so the absence of an ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray event does not indicate an instrument failure.
  • The in-flight commissioning of the Cherenkov telescope, fluorescence telescope, infrared cloud camera, solar power, and high-bandwidth telemetry means a longer flight of the same payload could pursue the planned science goals, including target-of-opportunity neutrino observations.
  • The about 10 Cherenkov candidates provide the observational basis for the next step: a detailed analysis and simulation of the event sample, which the paper says is in preparation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, if the about 10 candidates survive the deferred background analysis, the bi-focal two-spot trigger would be a strong template for future balloon and satellite Cherenkov instruments because it converts a geometric constraint into a hardware-level background rejection.
  • Beyond the paper, the recorded 2,893 bi-focal triggers could be mined for single-spot events to map the night-sky background and charged-particle environment at float altitude, a diagnostic the paper does not report.
  • Beyond the paper, folding the second night's cloud maps into the Cherenkov trigger rate would test how much of the candidate rate and its spatial distribution is modulated by atmospheric attenuation, extending the paper's cloud analysis from the fluorescence channel to the Cherenkov channel.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports the EUSO-SPB2 balloon mission: the payload and instrument design, pre-flight laboratory and desert characterizations, flight operations, and representative data from the 36 hr 52 min flight. The FT collected about 100,000 triggers and the search for UHECR fluorescence candidates yielded a null result, reported as consistent with the 0 to 2 events expected for the curtailed exposure. The CT collected 2,893 bi-focal triggers in 45 minutes of above-limb pointing, from which the paper reports "about 10 candidate EAS events from cosmic rays" recorded via Cherenkov light, with the detailed selection and simulation analysis deferred to a companion paper ([48]). The paper also describes the IR cloud camera, solar power system, Starlink telemetry, and the unsuccessful attempt to conduct ToO observations during the second night.

Significance. If the candidate Cherenkov events survive detailed analysis, they would be a first near-space observation of Cherenkov light from cosmic-ray air showers and would validate the bi-focal trigger concept for future missions such as POEMMA and PBR. The paper's strengths are its thorough instrument descriptions, the pre-flight optical and field-test characterizations, the large 56 GB flight dataset downloaded via Starlink, and the FT null result with a stated exposure and sensitivity estimate. The central scientific claim about the CT candidates, however, is explicitly preliminary and rests on an unvalidated background rejection, which weakens the paper as a stand-alone report of a detection.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 8.3.5 and abstract] The central detection claim is not supported by the material in this paper. The 2,893 bi-focal triggers were produced by the trigger described in Section 6.2, which issues a readout when two laterally adjacent MUSIC discriminators fire within a 50 ns window; the paper gives no expected random-coincidence rate from the measured single-MUSIC dark or night-sky rates, no candidate-selection criteria, no background model, and no false-positive estimate at float. The manuscript itself states that "Publication of a detailed analysis and simulation of this data set is in preparation," so the "about 10 HECR candidates" reported in the abstract and conclusions are currently indistinguishable from the tail of the background population without the deferred analysis. Please either include the quantitative background estimate and selection criteria, or explicitly reframe the claim as preliminary trigger-level events pending the companion analysis.
  2. [Section 6.6 and Figure 23] The ground field tests demonstrate that real EAS-like signals can produce the two-spot bi-focal pattern, but they do not validate the trigger's background rejection in the flight environment. The field test was performed looking upward from 1.4 km altitude and reports a rate consistent with TeV-scale EAS expectations within a factor of about four, yet it does not measure the false-trigger rate with the aperture covered or with the bi-focal trigger alone. Because the float environment differs in night-sky background, charged-particle flux, and atmospheric slant depth, this test cannot substitute for a background estimate in the analysis of the 45 minutes of above-limb flight data. Please either provide such an estimate or weaken the corresponding claim in Section 8.3.5 and the conclusions.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 1 and Section 2] Table 1 lists the total weight as 2557 kg (5625 lb), while Section 2 states an overall limit of 5500 lb; please clarify the apparent discrepancy, for example by noting a waiver, a measurement tolerance, or a typographical error.
  2. [Reference [25]] Reference [25] is titled "The EUSO-SPB1 solar power system," but Section 3.3 describes the EUSO-SPB2 science power system; the title appears to be an error.
  3. [Section 8.3.5] The sentence "where the smaller atmospheric slant depth yields and lower atmospheric attenuation yields a lower energy threshold" is grammatically tangled and should be reworded, for example as "where the smaller atmospheric slant depth and the lower atmospheric attenuation yield a lower energy threshold."
  4. [Section 6.1] The manufacturer is spelled "Hammatsu" in Section 6.1; it should be "Hamamatsu," as used elsewhere in the text.
  5. [Figure 37 caption] The caption reads "Example of an EAS candidate observed Cherenkov Telescope on May 14 2023"; it should read "...observed with the Cherenkov Telescope...".
  6. [Section 8.3.5 and reference [48]] The text says the detailed analysis and simulation are "in preparation" while citing [48], a published ICRC2023 paper; please clarify the relationship between [48] and the forthcoming detailed analysis.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this is an empirical mission report whose claims rest on flight data and field tests, not on a derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

This paper is a payload/mission report rather than a derivation. The central claims—successful commissioning, about 10 CT EAS candidates, and the FT null result—are empirical statements based on flight telemetry and detector data. No fitted parameter is used as input to the conclusions: the only fitted quantities mentioned (laser trigger efficiency curve parameters A and B, Section 5.4) characterize instrument response to an external laser and are not used to define the science results. The CT candidate identification is deferred to a companion analysis [48], and the paper explicitly says 'Publication of a detailed analysis and simulation of this data set is in preparation' (Section 8.3.5); deferring analysis is an incompleteness or evidence concern, not circularity, because the candidates are not defined into existence by the present paper's assumptions. The FT null result is compared with an expectation of 0 to 2 events derived from exposure and sensitivity, and is not manufactured from the search procedure. Self-citations appear throughout, but they provide context, instrument descriptions, or deferred analyses, and the load-bearing empirical content (flight duration, trigger counts, HLED comparisons, example events) is presented from the mission's own data. The only serious issue—whether the bi-focal 50 ns adjacency trigger adequately rejects night-sky background and charged-particle hits—is a question of background validation and statistical support, not of circular derivation. Since no step reduces by construction to its own inputs, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on established domain assumptions about air-shower fluorescence, Cherenkov emission, atmospheric transmission, and reanalysis cloud data. The central scientific claim is an instrument demonstration, not a parameter-free derivation, so the main burden is the unverified candidate analysis and the MERRA-2 cloud attribution.

free parameters (1)
  • Laser trigger efficiency fit parameters A and B = not specified in text (Figure 14)
    Fit to the fraction of laser shots triggering the FT as a function of energy in the field campaign; used to quote the FT trigger threshold but not part of the central science claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The fluorescence yield of nitrogen in air, as measured by AIRFLY [29], is accurate for converting detected UV photons to EAS energy.
    Used to estimate FT sensitivity and expected event rates (Sections 1 and 5, Ref [29]).
  • domain assumption Atmospheric transmission and Cherenkov light production are correctly modeled for EASs, particularly in the limb geometry.
    Expected CT rates and the PeV threshold rely on atmospheric models and CORSIKA simulations (Section 6.6 and Refs [19,20,48]).
  • domain assumption MERRA-2 reanalysis cloud fields represent actual cloud cover over the flight path, so second-night clouds can be invoked to explain the FT null result.
    Section 8.3.4 and Figure 33; without this, the null result could be attributed to instrument sensitivity rather than clouds.
  • domain assumption The bi-focal trigger's two-spot signature is a reliable discriminant for parallel EAS light against background.
    Section 6.2; central to identification of the about 10 CT candidates, but background rejection is not quantitatively demonstrated in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Extreme Universe Observatory on a Super-Pressure Balloon II: Mission, Payload, and Flight." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5UYUNZW2

@misc{pith2026250520762,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Extreme Universe Observatory on a Super-Pressure Balloon II: Mission, Payload, and Flight},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5UYUNZW2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.20762}
}
abstract

The Extreme Universe Space Observatory on a Super Pressure Balloon 2 (EUSO-SPB2) is a pathfinder mission toward a space-based observatory such as the Probe of Extreme Multi-Messenger Astrophysics (POEMMA). The aim of POEMMA is the observation of Ultra High Energy COsmic Rays (UHECRs) in order to elucidate their nature and origins and to discover $\gtrsim$ 20 PeV very high energy neutrinos that originate from transient and steady astrophysical sources. EUSO-SPB2 was launched from W\=anaka New Zealand on May 13th, 2023 as a NASA Balloon Program Office test flight. The mission goals included making the first near-space altitude observations of the fluorescence emission from UHECR-induced extensive air showers (EASs) and making the first direct Cherenkov light emission from PeV cosmic rays traversing Earth's atmosphere. In addition, a Target of Opportunity program was developed for selecting and scheduling observations of potential neutrino sources as they passed just below the Earth's limb. Although a leaky balloon forced termination over the Pacific Ocean after 37 hours, data was collected to demonstrate the successful commissioning and operation of the instruments. This paper includes a description of the payload and the key instruments, pre-flight instrument characterizations in the lab and in the desert, flight operations and examples of the data collected. The flight was too short to catch a UHECR event via fluorescence, however about 10 candidate EAS events from cosmic rays were recorded via Cherenkov light.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. POEMMA-Balloon with Radio: An Overview

    astro-ph.IM 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PBR is a proposed ultra-long-duration balloon payload combining fluorescence, Cherenkov, and radio detectors to observe ultra-high-energy cosmic rays and neutrinos from suborbital altitude.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [48]

    EUSO collaboration, The EUSO-SPB2 Cherenkov telescope - performance and preliminary results, PoS ICRC2023 (2023) 1029

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    Kotera and A.V

    K. Kotera and A.V. Olinto, The Astrophysics of Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays , Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 49 (2011) 119 [ 1101.4256]

    arXiv 2011

  3. [2]

    Alves Batista et al., Open Questions in Cosmic-Ray Research at Ultrahigh Energies , Front

    R. Alves Batista et al., Open Questions in Cosmic-Ray Research at Ultrahigh Energies , Front. Astron. Space Sci. 6 (2019) 23 [ 1903.06714]

    arXiv 2019

  4. [3]

    Pierre Augercollaboration, Observation of a Large-scale Anisotropy in the Arrival Directions of Cosmic Rays above 8 × 1018 eV, Science 357 (2017) 1266 [ 1709.07321]

    arXiv 2017

  5. [4]

    IceCube, Fermi-LAT, MAGIC, AGILE, ASAS-SN, HA WC, H.E.S.S., INTEGRAL, Kanata, Kiso, Kapteyn, Liverpool Telescope, Subaru, Swift NuSTAR, VERITAS, VLA/17B-403 collaboration, Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A, Science 361 (2018) eaat1378 [ 1807.08816]

    arXiv 2018

  6. [5]

    IceCube collaboration, Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068, Science 378 (2022) 538 [ 2211.09972]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [6]

    Benson and J

    R. Benson and J. Linsley, Satellite observation of cosmic ray air showers , in 17th International Cosmic Ray Conference, 1, 1981

    work page 1981

  8. [7]

    Fuglesang, The EUSO program: imaging of ultra-high energy cosmic rays by high-speed UV-video from space, Nucl

    C. Fuglesang, The EUSO program: imaging of ultra-high energy cosmic rays by high-speed UV-video from space, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 873 (2017) 1

    work page 2017

Show all 49 references
  1. [8]

    POEMMA collaboration, The POEMMA (Probe of Extreme Multi-Messenger Astrophysics) observatory, JCAP 06 (2021) 007 [ 2012.07945]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Anchordoqui et al., Performance and science reach of the Probe of Extreme Multimessenger Astrophysics for ultrahigh-energy particles , Phys

    L.A. Anchordoqui et al., Performance and science reach of the Probe of Extreme Multimessenger Astrophysics for ultrahigh-energy particles , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 023012 [1907.03694]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Venters, M.H

    T.M. Venters, M.H. Reno, J.F. Krizmanic, L.A. Anchordoqui, C. Gu´ epin and A.V. Olinto, POEMMA’s target-of-opportunity sensitivity to cosmic neutrino transient sources , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 123013 [ 1906.07209]. – 37 –

    2020 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Cummings, R

    A.L. Cummings, R. Aloisio and J.F. Krizmanic, Modeling of the tau and muon neutrino-induced optical cherenkov signals from upward-moving extensive air showers , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 043017

    2021

  5. [12]

    Reno, J.F

    M.H. Reno, J.F. Krizmanic and T.M. Venters, Cosmic tau neutrino detection via cherenkov signals from air showers from earth-emerging taus , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 063010

    2019

  6. [13]

    Venters, M.H

    T.M. Venters, M.H. Reno, J.F. Krizmanic, L.A. Anchordoqui, C. Gu´ epin and A.V. Olinto, Poemma’s target-of-opportunity sensitivity to cosmic neutrino transient sources , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 123013

    2020

  7. [14]

    POEMMA, JEM-EUSOcollaboration, Astrophysical Implications of Neutrino Target-of-Opportunity Observations with Space-based and Suborbital Optical Cherenkov Detectors, PoS ICRC2021 (2021) 977 [ 2206.02730]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Cummings, J

    A. Cummings, J. Eser, G. Filippatos, A. Olinto, T. Venters and L. Wiencke, EUSO-SPB2: A balloon experiment for UHECR and VHE neutrino observation , EPJ Web Conf. 283 (2023) 06009

    2023

  9. [16]

    Abdellaoui, S

    G. Abdellaoui, S. Abe, J. Adams, D. Allard, G. Alonso, L. Anchordoqui et al., Euso-spb1 mission and science , Astroparticle Physics 154 (2024) 102891

    2024

  10. [17]

    Abdellaoui, S

    G. Abdellaoui, S. Abe, J.H. Adams, Jr., A. Ahriche, D. Allard, L. Allen et al., First observations of speed of light tracks by a fluorescence detector looking down on the atmosphere , JInst 13 (2018) P05023

    2018

  11. [18]

    Adams et al., A Review of the EUSO-Balloon Pathfinder for the JEM-EUSO Program , Space Sci

    J.H. Adams et al., A Review of the EUSO-Balloon Pathfinder for the JEM-EUSO Program , Space Sci. Rev. 218 (2022) 3

    2022

  12. [19]

    JEM-EUSO collaboration, Science and mission status of EUSO-SPB2 , PoS ICRC2021 (2021) 404 [ 2112.08509]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [20]

    JEM-EUSO, POEMMAcollaboration, The Extreme Universe Space Observatory on a Super-Pressure Balloon II mission , PoS ICRC2019 (2020) 466 [ 1909.12835]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [21]

    JEM-EUSO collaboration, Expected performance of the EUSO-SPB2 fluorescence telescope , PoS ICRC2021 (2021) 405 [ 2112.07561]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [22]

    JEM-EUSO collaboration, Overview of the EUSO-SPB2 target of opportunity program using the Cherenkov telescope, PoS ICRC2023 (2023) 1134

    2023

  16. [23]

    JEM-EUSO collaboration, Neutrino target-of-opportunity sky coverage and scheduler for EUSO-SPB2, PoS ICRC2023 (2023) 1038

    2023

  17. [24]

    NASA/BPO, Gondola structural design requirements (820-PG-8700.0.1) , Tech. Rep. https://www.csbf.nasa.gov/documents/gondola/820 PG-8700.0.1 20Gondola 20Structural 20Design 20Requirements.pdf, NASA Balloon Program Office (BPO) (2019)

    2019

  18. [25]

    et al., The EUSO-SPB1 solar power system , Manuscript in Preparation

    J.A.J. et al., The EUSO-SPB1 solar power system , Manuscript in Preparation

  19. [26]

    Kungel, Phd thesis: Optics and pre-flight testing of the telescopes of the extreme universe space observatory on a super pressure balloon ii payload , 2023

    V. Kungel, Phd thesis: Optics and pre-flight testing of the telescopes of the extreme universe space observatory on a super pressure balloon ii payload , 2023

    2023

  20. [27]

    et al., The EUSO-SPB2 Fluorescence Telescope for the Detection of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays, Astroparticle Physics 165 (2025) 103046 [ 2406.13673]

    J.A.J. et al., The EUSO-SPB2 Fluorescence Telescope for the Detection of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays, Astroparticle Physics 165 (2025) 103046 [ 2406.13673]

    2025 arXiv

  21. [28]

    S. Blin, P. Barrillon, C. de La Taille, F. Dulucq, P. Gorodetzky and G. Pr´ evˆ ot,Spaciroc3: 100 mhz photon counting asic for euso-spb , Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 912 (2018) 363

    2018

  22. [29]

    AIRFLY collaboration, Spectrally resolved pressure dependence measurements of air fluorescence emission with AIRFLY, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 597 (2008) 41. – 38 –

    2008

  23. [30]

    M. Mese, V. Scotti, A. Anastasio, A. Boiano, F. Cafagna, C. Fornaro et al., Description and performance results of the data processor of the spb2 fluorescence telescope , in Proceedings of 38th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2023) , Sissa Medialab, July, 2023, DOI

    2023

  24. [31]

    Mackovjak, P

    ˇS. Mackovjak, P. Bob ´ ık, J. Bal´ aˇ z, I. Strh´ arsk´ y, M. Putiˇ s and P. Gorodetzky,Airglow monitoring by one-pixel detector , Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 922 (2019) 150

    2019

  25. [32]

    Filippatos, M

    G. Filippatos, M. Battisti, A. Belov, M. Bertaina, F. Bisconti, J. Eser et al., Development of a cosmic ray oriented trigger for the fluorescence telescope on euso-spb2 , Advances in Space Research 70 (2022) 2794 [ 2201.00794]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [33]

    JEM-EUSO collaboration, EUSO-SPB2 fluorescence telescope trigger test within the EUSO@TurLab project, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1045 (2023) 167611

    2023

  27. [34]

    P. Hunt, J. Eser, R. Bachman, M. Manz, L. Wiencke, C. Baron et al., The JEM-EUSO global light system laser station prototype , PoS ICRC2015 (2016) 626

    2016

  28. [35]

    JEM-EUSO collaboration, Extreme universe space observatory on a super pressure balloon 1 calibration: from the laboratory to the desert , Experimental Astronomy 52 (2021) 125–140 [2011.09617]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [36]

    JEM-EUSO collaboration, EUSO-SPB2 fluorescence telescope calibration and field tests , PoS ICRC2023 (2023) 468 [ 2310.06209]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [37]

    et al., The camera and readout for the Trinity demonstrator and the EUSO-SPB2 Cherenkov telescope, Manuscript in Preparation

    M.B. et al., The camera and readout for the Trinity demonstrator and the EUSO-SPB2 Cherenkov telescope, Manuscript in Preparation

  31. [38]

    G´ omez, D

    S. G´ omez, D. Gasc´ on, G. Fern´ andez, A. Sanuy, J. Mauricio, R. Graciani et al.,MUSIC: An 8 channel readout ASIC for SiPM arrays , Tech. Rep

  32. [39]

    Pollacco et al., GET: A generic electronics system for TPCs and nuclear physics instrumentation, Nucl

    E.C. Pollacco et al., GET: A generic electronics system for TPCs and nuclear physics instrumentation, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 887 (2018) 81

    2018

  33. [40]

    Jin, T.P

    Z. Jin, T.P. Charlock, K. Rutledge, K. Stamnes and Y. Wang, Analytical solution of radiative transfer in the coupled atmosphere-ocean system with a rough surface , Appl. Opt. 45 (2006) 7443

    2006

  34. [41]

    Anzalone, M.E

    A. Anzalone, M.E. Bertaina, S. Briz, C. Cassardo, R. Cremonini, A.J. de Castro et al., Methods to retrieve the cloud-top height in the frame of the jem-euso mission , IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 57 (2019) 304

    2019

  35. [42]

    JEM-EUSO collaboration, UCIRC2: An infrared cloud monitor for EUSO-SPB2 , PoS ICRC2019 (2019) 241 [ 1909.02663]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [43]

    C.N. R. Massey and W. Jones, Forty days and forty-five nights at space’s edge , Nat Astron 8 (2024) 264

    2024

  37. [44]

    JEM-EUSO collaboration, EUSO-SPB2 fluorescence telescope in-flight performance and preliminary results, PoS ICRC2023 (2023) 251 [ 2308.13477]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [45]

    S. Abe, J. Adams, D. Allard, P. Alldredge, R. Aloisio, L. Anchordoqui et al., Euso-offline: A comprehensive simulation and analysis framework , Journal of Instrumentation 19 (2024) P01007

    2024

  39. [46]

    Gelaro, W

    R. Gelaro, W. McCarty, M.J. Su´ arez, R. Todling, A. Molod, L. Takacs et al., The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (merra-2) , Journal of Climate 30 (2017) 5419

    2017

  40. [47]

    10.5067/Q9QMY5PBNV1T

    (GMAO), MERRA-2, tavg1 2d rad nx, 2d, 1-hourly, time-averaged, single level, assimilation, radiation diagnostics v5.12.4 , 2015. 10.5067/Q9QMY5PBNV1T. – 39 –

    2015 doi

  41. [49]

    C.G. et al. Manuscript in Preparation . – 40 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.