REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by
Cross-DINO: Cross the Deep MLP and Transformer for Small Object Detection
T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Cross-DINO claims that three coordinated fixes — a context-rich MLP backbone, a twice-gated encoder fusion, and a size-aware classification loss — raise COCO small-object AP_S from 32.0 to 36.4 while using fewer parameters than the DINO…
desk verdict The +4.4 AP_S claim is probably real, but the Boost loss doesn't do what the paper says it does, and the beta selection is internally inconsistent. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing mechanism is the Category-Size (CS) soft label, $cs_i = \sqrt{(h_i/H)(w_i/W)}\, y_i$, which fuses each object's class label with the square root of its area ratio to the image, and the Boost loss built on it; this is the component that directly targets low class-prediction scores for small objects. Two supporting mechanisms carry the rest of the argument: the CLAP-Strip-MLP backbone, an attention-free MLP whose overlapping-patch cropping makes it resolution-adaptive while mixing short- and long-range context, and the Cross Coding Twice Module (CCTM), a twice-gated fusion that re-injects fine-grained backbone detail into the blur-prone transformer encoder features. Together they supply richer initial features, counteract encoder blur, and reweight classification loss by object size.
What would settle it
On COCO val2017 with the same 12-epoch DINO recipe, replace the CS target $cs_i = \sqrt{(h_i/H)(w_i/W)}\, y_i$ with $cs_i = ((h_i/H)(w_i/W))^p\, y_i$ for several exponents p (e.g., 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2) and for a size-only reweighting with no class term; if AP_S stays roughly flat across p and across the no-class variant, the specific square-root category-size form is not what carries the gain.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the small-object deficit of DETR-like detectors is not one problem but three, and that a detector built to address all three at once beats the standard DINO baseline by +4.4% $AP_S$ (36.4% vs. 32.0%) on COCO val2017 using fewer parameters (45M vs. 47M) under the same 12-epoch training. The first fix is a deep MLP backbone, CLAP-Strip-MLP, whose strip-wise token mixing captures both local and global context; a cropping-with-overlap scheme lets this fixed-resolution MLP accept arbitrary image sizes. The second is CCTM, which uses two gated crossings to let transformer encoder features absorb fine-grained detail from backbone features, countering the blur that repeated attention layers impose on small objects. The third is Boost loss, whose Category-Size soft label $cs_i = \sqrt{(h_i/H)(w_i/W)}\, y_i$ reweights each positive classification term by object size, raising the training pressure on exactly the small objects whose confidence scores lag. The paper reports consistent $AP_S$ gains across ResNet50, Swin-T, and CLAP-Strip-T backbones, and improvements over DINO on WiderPerson, VisDrone2019, and SODA-D, while noting that on AI-TOD the CLAP-Strip-T backbone's fewer channels hurt until the input resolution is increased.
Load-bearing premise
The recipe depends on the assumption that multiplying a box's class label by the square root of its area ratio to the image, used as the training target, is what improves small-object detection, rather than just any stronger emphasis on small boxes.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- A DETR-like detector can gain 4.4 points of small-object AP on COCO val2017 without adding parameters, since Cross-DINO with CLAP-Strip-T runs at 45M parameters versus DINO's 47M.
- The CLAP cropping scheme converts fixed-resolution deep MLP backbones into general-purpose, arbitrary-resolution backbones, making them usable in dense prediction tasks beyond classification.
- Injecting backbone detail into encoder features through twice-gated fusion is a workable antidote to encoder feature blur for small objects.
- Boost loss raises classification attention on small objects: on all three backbones tested, replacing the standard focal loss with Boost loss improves AP_S, with the largest single-component gain on CLAP-Strip-T (+1.2 AP_S).
- The gains transfer across scene types: +3.7 AP on VisDrone2019, +4.3 AP on SODA-D, and +0.86 AP on WiderPerson with the Swin-T backbone.
Reading between the lines
- Editorial extension: the CS soft label is a geometric reweighting of standard classification loss; a natural test is whether the square-root area ratio is special or whether any monotone size function (e.g., linear or log area) gives the same gain.
- Editorial extension: CCTM's twice-gated fusion could be dropped into other encoder-decoder dense-prediction models, such as segmentation or keypoint detectors, wherever encoder downsampling blurs small structures.
- Editorial extension: the AI-TOD result suggests a boundary condition — an MLP backbone with 31.25% of ResNet's channels underserves very tiny objects — so the paper's recipe may need a channel-wider MLP or higher input resolution to keep its edge in extreme tiny-object regimes.
- Editorial extension: because the paper does not isolate feature-resolution from context-aggregation effects, an alternative explanation for part of the gain is that the deeper MLP simply provides a higher-quality feature pyramid; comparing Cross-DINO against DINO with a high-resolution ResNet variant would separate the two.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. Cross-DINO extends the DINO DETR-style detector with three components aimed at small object detection: (1) CLAP-Strip-T, an adaptation of the Strip-MLP backbone to arbitrary input resolutions via overlapping crops; (2) a Cross Coding Twice Module (CCTM) that fuses backbone features with transformer encoder features; and (3) a Boost Loss with a new 'Category-Size' (CS) soft label that is meant to re-weight classification objective toward small objects. The paper reports consistent gains over DINO on COCO val2017 (36.4% AP_S vs. 32.0% with the CLAP-Strip-T backbone), WiderPerson, VisDrone2019, SODA-D, and smaller gains on AI-TOD, using a 12-epoch training schedule and comparable parameter counts.
Significance. If the claims hold, the paper would provide a useful practical recipe for improving small-object detection in DETR-like detectors, and it would demonstrate that MLP-style backbones can be adapted to dense prediction tasks without retraining. The paper includes a broad set of comparisons and ablations across five datasets, which is a strength. However, the central novelty that is most load-bearing—the Boost Loss and its CS soft-label formulation—is currently not adequately justified quantitatively, and the stated mechanism does not match the equation as written. The backbone and module contributions are plausible and well evaluated, but the loss contribution needs correction or re-analysis before the headline result can be fully credited.
major comments (4)
- [Sec. III-D, Eq. (5)] The positive term of the Boost loss is α(1 - ĉs^β)^γ cs^β log(p_i). Since cs_i = sqrt((h_i/H)(w_i/W)) decreases with object size, the multiplier cs^β also decreases with decreasing size (for β=1, a 8×8 object in a 640×640 image gives cs≈0.0125 while an 80×80 object gives cs≈0.096). The claimed effect that 'smaller objects get larger loss' is therefore not implemented by this equation; the product (1 - ĉs^β)^γ cs^β is not monotone in size and can be inverted over plausible ranges. Table IX in the appendix computes the relative distance only for the (1 - ĉs^β)^γ factor, omitting the cs^β multiplier, so it does not support the stated behavior. Please provide a corrected loss form, a numerical demonstration that the full weight is monotone in the intended direction, or an explicit statement that the implemented loss is a different form than Eq. (5).
- [Sec. III-D, Eq. (4)-(5)] The paper repeatedly calls CS a 'soft label' and says it is used as 'new ground truth', but Eq. (5) is not cross-entropy with respect to the soft label cs. A standard soft-label cross-entropy for binary classification would include -(1-cs)log(1-p) in the positive-class term; here cs appears only as a multiplicative weight in the term -(cs^β)log(p). This is a semantic mismatch that affects the interpretation of the method. Please clarify whether cs is a soft label or a loss weight, and if it is a weight, justify the square-root-area functional form with a comparison to other size transforms (e.g., linear area, log-area, or relative-area-to-image).
- [Table VI and Table X] The hyperparameter β is set differently across settings without a sensitivity study on COCO: β=1.0 for COCO-ResNet50, β=0.1 for COCO-Swin-T, β=0.1 for SODA-D, β=0.05 for AI-TOD. Table X, the only β ablation, is on VisDrone and shows that β=0.25 gives a higher AP (35.8) than the chosen β=0.1 (35.4), with only a small drop in AP_vt; the paper does not explain why β=0.1 is then preferred. Because Boost Loss is credited with gains up to +1.2 AP_S in the CLAP-Strip-T ablation (Table VI), the dependence of the method on a per-dataset, per-backbone β choice is load-bearing and must be analyzed on the main benchmark (COCO) and, ideally, with a principled selection rule.
- [Sec. III-B and Appendix 'Methodology of CLAP'] The CLAP method is essential for using Strip-MLP as a general backbone, but it is only validated through an ERF visualization (Fig. 11) and indirect detection results. No ablation compares CLAP with alternative resolution-adaptation strategies (e.g., tiling without overlap, padding to a multiple of the fixed size, or interpolation to the fixed size), and no sensitivity to the overlap sizes lw/lh is reported. A quantitative comparison or an ablation on the overlap parameter would significantly strengthen the claim that the proposed cropping scheme, rather than the backbone capacity difference, is responsible for the observed gains.
minor comments (6)
- [Eq. (4)-(5), notation] The notation for y_i is ambiguous: y_i could be a scalar class index or a one-hot vector, and the loss in Eq. (5) is written in a form that resembles binary classification. Please define the multi-class version (e.g., with sum over classes) and state how p_i is computed from the model's softmax.
- [Fig. 3 and Sec. III-D] The caption of Fig. 3 says that Cross-DINO detects 'harder' small objects with lower scores, resulting in a decrease in average confidence scores, which appears to contradict the motivation of Boost Loss as improving class prediction scores. The main text should discuss this trade-off explicitly.
- [Table I] The row 'DINO [49] Swin-T' cites reference [49] (detrex) rather than the original DINO paper; this should be clarified so readers know the baseline source.
- [Sec. III-C, Eq. (3)] The fixed weight of 2 for the encoder feature in Ecf = 2E·B'E' + B·(1-B'E') is introduced without an ablation or sensitivity analysis; a brief justification or a small study would make this design choice transparent.
- [Appendix, Table IX] In the caption of Table IX, γ is listed as 0.25, while the main text states the default γ=2.0; the inconsistency is confusing and should be corrected.
- [Sec. I and Conclusion] The paper says 'we introduce a new deep MLP model' but actually the deep MLP component is the existing Strip-MLP adapted by CLAP; rephrase to avoid overclaiming novelty of the backbone architecture itself.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: external benchmarks and independent ablations ground the claims.
full rationale
Cross-DINO's central claims are empirical results on external benchmarks (COCO val2017, VisDrone2019 test-dev, SODA-D test, WiderPerson, AI-TOD), not quantities derived by definition from the method's own equations. The CLAP-Strip-T backbone is built on the authors' earlier Strip-MLP (ref. [5]), but that citation is an independently published ICCV paper with released code, and its contribution here is established by the paper's own DINO-CLAP-Strip-T ablation (+3.0 AP_S over DINO), not by an appeal to authority or a uniqueness theorem. CCTM is a gating module whose internal design is tested by component ablations (Table VIII), and Boost loss is a loss-function proposal whose effect is measured by train/val comparisons (Tables VI, XI). The appendix does reveal that beta was selected on the VisDrone2019 test set (Table X), which is a legitimate test-set-tuning concern and a correctness risk, but it is not circularity: the reported AP is not forced by construction from the definition of cs, and no equation in the paper reduces a predicted quantity to a fitted parameter or defines a component in terms of the target metric. The skeptic's concern that Eq. (5)'s cs^beta multiplier may not implement the stated 'smaller objects get larger loss' mechanism is a mathematical-correctness issue, not circularity, since the loss's effectiveness is an empirical finding rather than an input assumption. Self-citations [4] and [5] are not load-bearing as arguments. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (4)
- alpha (α) =
0.25
- gamma (γ) =
2.0
- beta (β) =
1.0 for COCO, 0.1 for VisDrone/SODA-D, 0.05 for AI-TOD
- CCTM encoder-feature weight of 2 =
2
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption The soft label cs = sqrt((h/H)*(w/W))*y correctly encodes the desired relationship between object size and classification confidence.
- domain assumption The backbone feature B and encoder feature E are compatible for element-wise gating in CCTM because they have the same spatial resolution and feature dimension.
- ad hoc to paper Applying the pre-trained Strip-MLP as overlapping patches using CLAP preserves the information aggregation properties of the original fixed-resolution model.
- domain assumption DINO's training recipe and post-processing are sufficient for a fair comparison, and the models are not overfitting to small-object metrics despite no error bars.
- domain assumption The AP and related metrics on COCO, VisDrone, AI-TOD, SODA-D, and WiderPerson are the right evaluation for SOD and improvements on them are not metric-specific artifacts.
invented entities (2)
-
CLAP method (Cropping with Adaptive overLaPping)
-
Category-Size (CS) soft label
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Cross-DINO: Cross the Deep MLP and Transformer for Small Object Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JDQNKYIN
@misc{pith2026250521868,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Cross-DINO: Cross the Deep MLP and Transformer for Small Object Detection},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JDQNKYIN}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.21868}
}
read the original abstract
Small Object Detection (SOD) poses significant challenges due to limited information and the model's low class prediction score. While Transformer-based detectors have shown promising performance, their potential for SOD remains largely unexplored. In typical DETR-like frameworks, the CNN backbone network, specialized in aggregating local information, struggles to capture the necessary contextual information for SOD. The multiple attention layers in the Transformer Encoder face difficulties in effectively attending to small objects and can also lead to blurring of features. Furthermore, the model's lower class prediction score of small objects compared to large objects further increases the difficulty of SOD. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel approach called Cross-DINO. This approach incorporates the deep MLP network to aggregate initial feature representations with both short and long range information for SOD. Then, a new Cross Coding Twice Module (CCTM) is applied to integrate these initial representations to the Transformer Encoder feature, enhancing the details of small objects. Additionally, we introduce a new kind of soft label named Category-Size (CS), integrating the Category and Size of objects. By treating CS as new ground truth, we propose a new loss function called Boost Loss to improve the class prediction score of the model. Extensive experimental results on COCO, WiderPerson, VisDrone, AI-TOD, and SODA-D datasets demonstrate that Cross-DINO efficiently improves the performance of DETR-like models on SOD. Specifically, our model achieves 36.4% APs on COCO for SOD with only 45M parameters, outperforming the DINO by +4.4% APS (36.4% vs. 32.0%) with fewer parameters and FLOPs, under 12 epochs training setting. The source codes will be available at https://github.com/Med-Process/Cross-DINO.
Figures
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
DS-Det: Single-Query Paradigm and Attention Disentangled Learning for Flexible Object Detection
A flexible-query transformer detector that separates cross-attention localization from self-attention deduplication reports consistent accuracy gains over DINO across five backbones.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Brais Bosquet, Daniel Cores, Lorenzo Seidenari, V ´ıctor M Brea, Manuel Mucientes, and Alberto Del Bimbo. A full data augmentation pipeline for small object detection based on generative adversarial networks. Pattern Recognition, 133:108998, 2023
work page 2023
-
[2]
Cascade r-cnn: Delving into high quality object detection
Zhaowei Cai and Nuno Vasconcelos. Cascade r-cnn: Delving into high quality object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 6154–6162, 2018
work page 2018
-
[3]
Visible and clear: Finding tiny objects in difference map
Bing Cao, Haiyu Yao, Pengfei Zhu, and Qinghua Hu. Visible and clear: Finding tiny objects in difference map. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1–18. Springer, 2025
work page 2025
-
[4]
Mlp-dino: Category modeling and query graphing with deep mlp for object detection
Guiping Cao, Wenjian Huang, Xiangyuan Lan, Jianguo Zhang, Dongmei Jiang, and Yaowei Wang. Mlp-dino: Category modeling and query graphing with deep mlp for object detection. In IJCAI, 2024
work page 2024
-
[5]
Strip-mlp: Efficient token interaction for vision mlp
Guiping Cao, Shengda Luo, Wenjian Huang, Xiangyuan Lan, Dongmei Jiang, Yaowei Wang, and Jianguo Zhang. Strip-mlp: Efficient token interaction for vision mlp. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 1494–1504, 2023
work page 2023
-
[6]
Cf-detr: Coarse-to- fine transformers for end-to-end object detection
Xipeng Cao, Peng Yuan, Bailan Feng, and Kun Niu. Cf-detr: Coarse-to- fine transformers for end-to-end object detection. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume 36, pages 185–193, 2022
work page 2022
-
[7]
End-to-end object detection with transformers
Nicolas Carion, Francisco Massa, Gabriel Synnaeve, Nicolas Usunier, Alexander Kirillov, and Sergey Zagoruyko. End-to-end object detection with transformers. In European conference on computer vision , pages 213–229. Springer, 2020
2020
-
[8]
Crossvit: Cross-attention multi-scale vision transformer for image classification
Chun-Fu Richard Chen, Quanfu Fan, and Rameswar Panda. Crossvit: Cross-attention multi-scale vision transformer for image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 357–366, 2021
2021
Show all 77 references
-
[9]
Diffusiondet: Diffusion model for object detection
Shoufa Chen, Peize Sun, Yibing Song, and Ping Luo. Diffusiondet: Diffusion model for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 19830–19843, 2023
2023
-
[10]
Towards large-scale small object detection: Survey and benchmarks
Gong Cheng, Xiang Yuan, Xiwen Yao, Kebing Yan, Qinghua Zeng, Xingxing Xie, and Junwei Han. Towards large-scale small object detection: Survey and benchmarks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 45(11):13467–13488, 2023
2023
-
[11]
Dynamic head: Unifying object detection heads with attentions
Xiyang Dai, Yinpeng Chen, Bin Xiao, Dongdong Chen, Mengchen Liu, Lu Yuan, and Lei Zhang. Dynamic head: Unifying object detection heads with attentions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 7373–7382, 2021
2021
-
[12]
Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei- Fei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 248–255. Ieee, 2009
2009
-
[13]
Pedes- trian detection: An evaluation of the state of the art
Piotr Dollar, Christian Wojek, Bernt Schiele, and Pietro Perona. Pedes- trian detection: An evaluation of the state of the art. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 34(4):743–761, 2011
2011
-
[14]
An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale
Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weis- senborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In International C...
2020
-
[15]
Centernet: Keypoint triplets for object detection
Kaiwen Duan, Song Bai, Lingxi Xie, Honggang Qi, Qingming Huang, and Qi Tian. Centernet: Keypoint triplets for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 6569–6578, 2019
2019
-
[16]
Dssd: Deconvolutional single shot detector
Cheng-Yang Fu, Wei Liu, Ananth Ranga, Ambrish Tyagi, and Alexan- der C Berg. Dssd: Deconvolutional single shot detector. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06659, 2017
2017 arXiv
-
[17]
Ps-rcnn: Detecting secondary human instances in a crowd via primary object suppression
Zheng Ge, Zequn Jie, Xin Huang, Rong Xu, and Osamu Yoshie. Ps-rcnn: Detecting secondary human instances in a crowd via primary object suppression. In 2020 IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo (ICME), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2020
2020
-
[18]
Save the tiny, save the all: hierarchical activation network for tiny object detection
Guangqian Guo, Pengfei Chen, Xuehui Yu, Zhenjun Han, Qixiang Ye, and Shan Gao. Save the tiny, save the all: hierarchical activation network for tiny object detection. IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, 34:221–234, 2023
2023
-
[19]
Mask r-cnn
Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Doll ´ar, and Ross Girshick. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2961–2969, 2017
2017
-
[20]
Deep residual learning for image recognition
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 770–778, 2016
2016
-
[21]
Multi- scale feature balance enhancement network for pedestrian detection
Yuzhe He, Ning He, Ren Zhang, Kang Yan, and Haigang Yu. Multi- scale feature balance enhancement network for pedestrian detection. Multimedia Systems, 28(3):1135–1145, 2022
2022
-
[22]
Gaussian error linear units (gelus)
Dan Hendrycks and Kevin Gimpel. Gaussian error linear units (gelus). arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08415 , 2016
2016 arXiv
-
[23]
Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications
Andrew G Howard, Menglong Zhu, Bo Chen, Dmitry Kalenichenko, Weijun Wang, Tobias Weyand, Marco Andreetto, and Hartwig Adam. Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861 , 2017
2017 arXiv
-
[24]
Dq-detr: Detr with dynamic query for tiny object detection
Yi-Xin Huang, Hou-I Liu, Hong-Han Shuai, and Wen-Huang Cheng. Dq-detr: Detr with dynamic query for tiny object detection. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 290–305. Springer, 2025
2025
-
[25]
Detrs with hybrid matching
Ding Jia, Yuhui Yuan, Haodi He, Xiaopei Wu, Haojun Yu, Weihong Lin, Lei Sun, Chao Zhang, and Han Hu. Detrs with hybrid matching. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19702–19712, 2023
2023
-
[26]
Augmentation for small object detection
Mate Kisantal, Zbigniew Wojna, Jakub Murawski, Jacek Naruniec, and Kyunghyun Cho. Augmentation for small object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.07296, 2019
1902 arXiv
-
[27]
Cornernet: Detecting objects as paired keypoints
Hei Law and Jia Deng. Cornernet: Detecting objects as paired keypoints. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) , pages 734–750, 2018
2018
-
[28]
Dn-detr: Accelerate detr training by introducing query denoising
Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Shilong Liu, Jian Guo, Lionel M Ni, and Lei Zhang. Dn-detr: Accelerate detr training by introducing query denoising. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 13619–13627, 2022
2022
-
[29]
Focal loss for dense object detection
Tsung-Yi Lin, Priya Goyal, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, and Piotr Doll ´ar. Focal loss for dense object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , pages 2980–2988, 2017
2017
-
[30]
Microsoft coco: Common objects in context
Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Doll´ar, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceeding...
2014
-
[31]
Are we ready for a new paradigm shift? a survey on visual deep mlp
Ruiyang Liu, Yinghui Li, Linmi Tao, Dun Liang, and Hai-Tao Zheng. Are we ready for a new paradigm shift? a survey on visual deep mlp. Patterns, 3(7):100520, 2022
2022
-
[32]
Dab-detr: Dynamic anchor boxes are better queries for detr
Shilong Liu, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Xiao Yang, Xianbiao Qi, Hang Su, Jun Zhu, and Lei Zhang. Dab-detr: Dynamic anchor boxes are better queries for detr. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021
2021
-
[33]
Detection transformer with stable matching
Shilong Liu, Tianhe Ren, Jiayu Chen, Zhaoyang Zeng, Hao Zhang, Feng Li, Hongyang Li, Jun Huang, Hang Su, Jun Zhu, et al. Detection transformer with stable matching. In 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 6468–6477. IEEE, 2023
2023
-
[34]
Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection
Shilong Liu, Zhaoyang Zeng, Tianhe Ren, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Jie Yang, Chunyuan Li, Jianwei Yang, Hang Su, Jun Zhu, et al. Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.05499 , 2023
2023 arXiv
-
[35]
Ssd: Single shot multibox detector
Wei Liu, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Christian Szegedy, Scott Reed, Cheng-Yang Fu, and Alexander C Berg. Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14, p...
2016
-
[36]
A survey and performance evaluation of deep learning methods for small object detection
Yang Liu, Peng Sun, Nickolas Wergeles, and Yi Shang. A survey and performance evaluation of deep learning methods for small object detection. Expert Systems with Applications , 172:114602, 2021
2021
-
[37]
Vmamba: Visual state space model
Yue Liu, Yunjie Tian, Yuzhong Zhao, Hongtian Yu, Lingxi Xie, Yaowei Wang, Qixiang Ye, and Yunfan Liu. Vmamba: Visual state space model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10166 , 2024
2024 arXiv
-
[38]
Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows
Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Baining Guo. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 10012–10022, 2021
2021
-
[39]
A convnet for the 2020s
Zhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer, Trevor Darrell, and Saining Xie. A convnet for the 2020s. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11976–11986, 2022
2022
-
[40]
Decoupled weight decay regulariza- tion
Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regulariza- tion. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018
2018
-
[41]
Understand- ing the effective receptive field in deep convolutional neural networks
Wenjie Luo, Yujia Li, Raquel Urtasun, and Richard Zemel. Understand- ing the effective receptive field in deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems , 29, 2016
2016
-
[42]
Cascade transformer decoder based occluded pedestrian detection with dynamic deformable convolution and gaussian projection channel atten- tion mechanism
Chunjie Ma, Li Zhuo, Jiafeng Li, Yutong Zhang, and Jing Zhang. Cascade transformer decoder based occluded pedestrian detection with dynamic deformable convolution and gaussian projection channel atten- tion mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia , 2023
2023
-
[43]
Conditional detr for fast training convergence
Depu Meng, Xiaokang Chen, Zejia Fan, Gang Zeng, Houqiang Li, Yuhui Yuan, Lei Sun, and Jingdong Wang. Conditional detr for fast training convergence. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 3651–3660, 2021. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA 12
2021
-
[44]
Efficient featurized image pyramid network for single shot detector
Yanwei Pang, Tiancai Wang, Rao Muhammad Anwer, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, and Ling Shao. Efficient featurized image pyramid network for single shot detector. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 7336–7344, 2019
2019
-
[45]
Detectors: Detecting objects with recursive feature pyramid and switchable atrous convolu- tion
Siyuan Qiao, Liang-Chieh Chen, and Alan Yuille. Detectors: Detecting objects with recursive feature pyramid and switchable atrous convolu- tion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 10213–10224, 2021
2021
-
[46]
You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection
Joseph Redmon, Santosh Divvala, Ross Girshick, and Ali Farhadi. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 779–788, 2016
2016
-
[47]
Transformers in small object detection: A benchmark and survey of state-of-the-art
Aref Miri Rekavandi, Shima Rashidi, Farid Boussaid, Stephen Hoefs, Emre Akbas, et al. Transformers in small object detection: A benchmark and survey of state-of-the-art. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.04902 , 2023
2023 arXiv
-
[48]
Faster r- cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks
Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster r- cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. Advances in neural information processing systems , 28, 2015
2015
-
[49]
detrex: Benchmarking detection transformers
Tianhe Ren, Shilong Liu, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Ailing Zeng, Jie Yang, Xingyu Liao, Ding Jia, Hongyang Li, He Cao, et al. detrex: Benchmarking detection transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.07265, 2023
2023 arXiv
-
[50]
Sparse detr: Efficient end-to-end object detection with learnable sparsity
Byungseok Roh, JaeWoong Shin, Wuhyun Shin, and Saehoon Kim. Sparse detr: Efficient end-to-end object detection with learnable sparsity. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021
2021
-
[51]
Iterdet: iterative scheme for object detection in crowded environments
Danila Rukhovich, Konstantin Sofiiuk, Danil Galeev, Olga Barinova, and Anton Konushin. Iterdet: iterative scheme for object detection in crowded environments. In Structural, Syntactic, and Statistical Pattern Recognition: Joint IAPR International Workshops, S+ SSPR 2020, Padua...
2020
-
[52]
Object detection in medical images based on hierarchical transformer and mask mechanism
Yuntao Shou, Tao Meng, Wei Ai, Canhao Xie, Haiyan Liu, and Yina Wang. Object detection in medical images based on hierarchical transformer and mask mechanism. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 2022
2022
-
[53]
Sniper: Efficient multi- scale training
Bharat Singh, Mahyar Najibi, and Larry S Davis. Sniper: Efficient multi- scale training. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 31. Curran Associates, Inc., 2018
2018
-
[54]
Sparse r-cnn: End-to-end object detection with learnable proposals
Peize Sun, Rufeng Zhang, Yi Jiang, Tao Kong, Chenfeng Xu, Wei Zhan, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Lei Li, Zehuan Yuan, Changhu Wang, et al. Sparse r-cnn: End-to-end object detection with learnable proposals. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recogn...
2021
-
[55]
An image patch is a wave: Phase-aware vision mlp
Yehui Tang, Kai Han, Jianyuan Guo, Chang Xu, Yanxi Li, Chao Xu, and Yunhe Wang. An image patch is a wave: Phase-aware vision mlp. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10935–10944, 2022
2022
-
[56]
Multi- scale sampling attention graph convolutional networks for skeleton- based action recognition
Haoyu Tian, Yipeng Zhang, Hanbo Wu, Xin Ma, and Yibin Li. Multi- scale sampling attention graph convolutional networks for skeleton- based action recognition. Neurocomputing, page 128086, 2024
2024
-
[57]
Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention
Hugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa, Alexandre Sablayrolles, and Herv ´e J´egou. Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention. In International conference on machine learning , pages 10347–10357. PMLR, 2021
2021
-
[58]
Yolov7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors
Chien-Yao Wang, Alexey Bochkovskiy, and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao. Yolov7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 7464–7475, 2023
2023
-
[59]
A normalized gaussian wasserstein distance for tiny object detection
Jinwang Wang, Chang Xu, Wen Yang, and Lei Yu. A normalized gaussian wasserstein distance for tiny object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.13389, 2021
2021 arXiv
-
[60]
Tiny object detection in aerial images
Jinwang Wang, Wen Yang, Haowen Guo, Ruixiang Zhang, and Gui-Song Xia. Tiny object detection in aerial images. In 2020 25th international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR) , pages 3791–3798. IEEE, 2021
2020
-
[61]
Convnext v2: Co-designing and scaling convnets with masked autoencoders
Sanghyun Woo, Shoubhik Debnath, Ronghang Hu, Xinlei Chen, Zhuang Liu, In So Kweon, and Saining Xie. Convnext v2: Co-designing and scaling convnets with masked autoencoders. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 16133–16142, 2023
2023
-
[62]
Rfla: Gaussian receptive field based label assignment for tiny object detection
Chang Xu, Jinwang Wang, Wen Yang, Huai Yu, Lei Yu, and Gui-Song Xia. Rfla: Gaussian receptive field based label assignment for tiny object detection. In European conference on computer vision , pages 526–543. Springer, 2022
2022
-
[63]
Querydet: Cas- caded sparse query for accelerating high-resolution small object detec- tion
Chenhongyi Yang, Zehao Huang, and Naiyan Wang. Querydet: Cas- caded sparse query for accelerating high-resolution small object detec- tion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 13668–13677, 2022
2022
-
[64]
Rep- points: Point set representation for object detection
Ze Yang, Shaohui Liu, Han Hu, Liwei Wang, and Stephen Lin. Rep- points: Point set representation for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 9657–9666, 2019
2019
-
[65]
Efficient detr: improving end-to-end object detector with dense prior
Zhuyu Yao, Jiangbo Ai, Boxun Li, and Chi Zhang. Efficient detr: improving end-to-end object detector with dense prior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.01318, 2021
2021 arXiv
-
[66]
Multi-scale context aggregation by dilated convolutions
Fisher Yu and Vladlen Koltun. Multi-scale context aggregation by dilated convolutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.07122 , 2015
2015 arXiv
-
[67]
Small object detection via coarse-to-fine proposal generation and imitation learning
Xiang Yuan, Gong Cheng, Kebing Yan, Qinghua Zeng, and Junwei Han. Small object detection via coarse-to-fine proposal generation and imitation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 6317–6327, 2023
2023
-
[68]
Dino: Detr with improved denoising anchor boxes for end-to-end object detection
Hao Zhang, Feng Li, Shilong Liu, Lei Zhang, Hang Su, Jun Zhu, Lionel Ni, and Heung-Yeung Shum. Dino: Detr with improved denoising anchor boxes for end-to-end object detection. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022
2022
-
[69]
Single-shot refinement neural network for object detection
Shifeng Zhang, Longyin Wen, Xiao Bian, Zhen Lei, and Stan Z Li. Single-shot refinement neural network for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4203–4212, 2018
2018
-
[70]
Widerperson: A diverse dataset for dense pedestrian detection in the wild
Shifeng Zhang, Yiliang Xie, Jun Wan, Hansheng Xia, Stan Z Li, and Guodong Guo. Widerperson: A diverse dataset for dense pedestrian detection in the wild. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia , 22(2):380– 393, 2019
2019
-
[71]
Less is more: Focus attention for efficient detr
Dehua Zheng, Wenhui Dong, Hailin Hu, Xinghao Chen, and Yunhe Wang. Less is more: Focus attention for efficient detr. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 6674–6683, 2023
2023
-
[72]
Learning deep features for discriminative localization
Bolei Zhou, Aditya Khosla, Agata Lapedriza, Aude Oliva, and Antonio Torralba. Learning deep features for discriminative localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2921–2929, 2016
2016
-
[73]
Detection and tracking meet drones challenge
Pengfei Zhu, Longyin Wen, Dawei Du, Xiao Bian, Heng Fan, Qinghua Hu, and Haibin Ling. Detection and tracking meet drones challenge. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 44(11):7380–7399, 2021
2021
-
[74]
Deformable detr: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection
Xizhou Zhu, Weijie Su, Lewei Lu, Bin Li, Xiaogang Wang, and Jifeng Dai. Deformable detr: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2020
2020
-
[75]
Detrs with collaborative hy- brid assignments training
Zhuofan Zong, Guanglu Song, and Yu Liu. Detrs with collaborative hy- brid assignments training. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 6748–6758, 2023
2023
-
[76]
Learning data augmentation strategies for object detection
Barret Zoph, Ekin D Cubuk, Golnaz Ghiasi, Tsung-Yi Lin, Jonathon Shlens, and Quoc V Le. Learning data augmentation strategies for object detection. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXVII 16 , pages 566–5...
2020
-
[77]
Object detection in 20 years: A survey
Zhengxia Zou, Keyan Chen, Zhenwei Shi, Yuhong Guo, and Jieping Ye. Object detection in 20 years: A survey. Proceedings of the IEEE , 111(3):257–276, 2023. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA 13 APPENDIX METHODOLOGY OF CLAP a) Issue of Fixed Image Size for the Deep MLP: In the main...
2023
Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.