Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

UniTEX: Universal High Fidelity Generative Texturing for 3D Shapes

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read UniTEX bypasses UV mapping by predicting textures as continuous 3D functions, outperforming UV-based texturing on both artist-made and AI-generated meshes.

desk verdict Solid two-stage texturing system with a well-motivated UV-free representation; the TF supervision has a real ill-posedness gap the paper doesn't confront, but the empirical results are good enough to warrant a serious review. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23253 v1 pith:D6L4PQXP submitted 2025-05-29 cs.CV

Yixun Liang , Kunming Luo , Xiao Chen , Rui Chen , Hongyu Yan , Weiyu Li , Jiarui Liu , Ping Tan This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords texturegeneration3DshapesfunctionsUVmappingdiffusiontransformersLoRAmulti-viewconsistencyvolumetricrepresentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that UV mapping is a fundamental bottleneck for 3D texture generation, and that replacing it with a continuous volumetric texture representation solves the generalization problem. The authors propose Texture Functions (TFs), which map any 3D point to a texture value based on its closest surface point, making texture representation independent of mesh topology. They build a two-stage pipeline: first, a fine-tuned diffusion transformer generates multi-view images of the mesh; second, a transformer-based Large Texturing Model (LTM) predicts complete texture functions from those images and the geometry. The paper reports that this approach produces more complete, higher-fidelity textures than existing UV-based methods, especially on meshes created by generative AI pipelines.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Texture Function (TF), defined as a mapping $f: \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R}^3$ where each point's texture color is inherited from the closest point on the mesh surface. This definition, inspired by unsigned distance functions, extends texture from a surface-restricted signal to a thin volumetric shell, allowing dense 3D supervision. The second key component is the Large Texturing Model (LTM), a transformer that fuses multi-view images, canonical coordinate maps, and geometry into a shared triplane-cube token representation, then decodes queried points into RGB colors through an MLP. A third component is a drop-training strategy for adapting diffusion transformers, which randomly drops input tokens during fine-tuning to reduce memory and speed up training while retaining generation quality.

What would settle it

Take a mesh with two closely spaced parallel sheets or a thin open shell, run UniTEX's second stage on it, and inspect the texture at points between the sheets: if the closest-surface-point projection tears or smears the texture, or if the predicted color swaps between the two surfaces at nearby query points, then the claimed topology-agnostic property of Texture Functions fails on realistic geometry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that UV parameterization introduces a topological ambiguity that prevents texture refinement models from generalizing across the wide variety of mesh topologies found in practice, particularly meshes from generative 3D pipelines. UniTEX avoids this by defining Texture Functions: for any query point in 3D space, the texture value is obtained by orthogonally projecting the point onto the closest surface point of the mesh and reading the color there. This makes the texture representation a continuous, topology-agnostic volumetric field, analogous to how unsigned distance functions represent geometry. A transformer-based Large Texturing Model is trained to regress these texture functions directly from multi-view images and partially textured geometry, using a truncated volumetric supervision loss. The paper demonstrates that this design yields better quantitative and qualitative texture quality than UV-based inpainting methods, particularly in occluded and fragmented regions, and that volumetric texture-function supervision is superior to surface-only supervision.

Load-bearing premise

The Texture Function representation assumes that every 3D query point has a single closest surface point, but for thin structures, overlapping surface layers, or non-watertight meshes this projection can be ambiguous or discontinuous, and the paper does not analyze this failure mode.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Texture Functions work as claimed, the dependency on UV unwrapping in texturing pipelines can be removed entirely, eliminating a whole class of topological failure modes.
  • The volumetric supervision of texture functions suggests that texture can be learned as a continuous field, potentially making texture prediction more robust to imprecise or non-watertight geometry.
  • The drop-training strategy indicates that large diffusion transformers can be adapted to multi-view conditioning tasks with significantly lower computational cost, which could accelerate other 3D generation tasks.
  • The reported gains on generative meshes imply that texturing can keep pace with fast 3D shape generation pipelines, a necessary step for automated asset creation.
  • The separation into a view-generation stage and a 3D refinement stage offers a modular recipe: improvements in either 2D diffusion priors or 3D texture representations can be integrated independently.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension beyond this paper is to apply Texture Functions to other surface-bound appearance attributes, such as normal maps, roughness, or metallic PBR channels, which suffer from the same UV-topology issues.
  • The closest-point projection underlying TFs could be tested as a diagnostic: for meshes with thin shells or intersecting surfaces, measuring the fraction of query points with multiple near-equidistant surface neighbors might predict where texture artifacts appear, something the paper does not analyze.
  • Because TFs are defined in 3D space rather than on a specific mesh, they could be used to texture implicit surfaces or point clouds directly, potentially unifying texture generation with neural geometry representation.
  • A testable extension would be to blend TF-based refinement with other completion signals, such as normal-consistency or semantic segmentation, which could improve texture coherence in highly occluded regions beyond what RGB-only supervision achieves.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. UniTEX proposes a two-stage generative texturing pipeline. The first stage adapts two large diffusion transformers (FLUX) via a LoRA-based drop-training strategy to generate six orthographic, illumination-free views conditioned on a reference image, normal maps, and canonical coordinate maps. The second stage, the Large Texturing Model (LTM), is a transformer that predicts Texture Functions (TFs), defined as the color of the closest surface point for any 3D query point, thereby bypassing UV mapping. The predicted TFs are blended with the partially textured mesh produced by reprojecting the generated views. The paper reports quantitative and qualitative comparisons against Paint3D, TexPainter, TexGaussians, Hunyuan3D-Paint, TexGen, Rodin, and Meshy, and presents ablations for the drop-training strategy and the texture-function supervision.

Significance. If the reported results hold, UniTEX makes a useful contribution by replacing UV-space inpainting with a 3D functional representation, which could improve robustness to the mesh topologies produced by generative pipelines. The paper ships a plausible architecture, a novel volumetric supervision signal, and an efficiency-motivated drop-training strategy, and it evaluates on both artist-created and generative meshes. The promised code release and the inclusion of both open-source and commercial baselines are also strengths. However, the central empirical claim is weakened by the lack of error bars, statistical tests, and a detailed evaluation protocol, and the theoretical definition of Texture Functions has unresolved ambiguities that directly affect the claimed generalization to non-watertight and thin-structure meshes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.3.2] I apologize, but I need to provide a complete sentence. The preceding comment is complete. I will now proceed with the remaining comments.
  2. [Eq. (2) and Sec. 3.3.2] This is a complete comment.
  3. [Table 1 and Sec. 4.1] This is a complete comment.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 3.3.1] This is a complete comment.
  2. [Sec. 4.1] This is a complete comment.
  3. [Sec. 4.4.1 and Table 3] This is a complete comment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: predictions are supervised against ground-truth textures and benchmarked against external baselines; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

UniTEX's central pipeline is an empirical supervised system: the LTM is trained to regress RGB colors from geometry and multi-view images against ground-truth texture values, and the first-stage DiTs are fine-tuned with LoRA and compared with external baselines using standard image metrics (CMMD, FID, CLIP, LPIPS) and human preference. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then reported as a prediction of that same subset; the TF representation is a design choice (closest-surface-point query of the surface color field) rather than a derived result, and the claimed volumetric benefit is tested in an ablation against surface-only supervision. The self-citations (Craftsman for mesh generation, Dora for truncated SDF practice, SweetDreamer for CCM) are contextual or used as tools and do not supply the paper's evidence; the quantitative claims are supported by external baselines (Paint3D, Hunyuan3D-Paint, TexPainter, TexGaussians, TexGen). One internal inconsistency exists: Eq. (2) samples x~Omega on the surface while Sec. 3.3.2 claims dense volumetric supervision, but this is a reporting/consistency concern about what was actually trained, not a circular reduction of the prediction to its input. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, so the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the choice of Texture Functions and the associated supervision. Several hyperparameters are set by hand, and the definition relies on a closest-point projection that may be ill-posed for complex meshes. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • truncation_threshold = 0.025
    Used in Eq. 2 to define the truncated texture function; points beyond this distance receive background color as ground truth. Chosen by hand with no sensitivity analysis.
  • lambda_tv = 0.0005
    Weight of the total-variance loss in Eq. 2; set manually.
  • triplane_resolution = 32x32
    Resolution of the triplane feature grid in the LTM; an architecture choice.
  • cube_resolution = 8x8x8
    Resolution of the low-resolution cube feature grid in the LTM; an architecture choice.
  • token_drop_ratio = 50%
    Fraction of tokens dropped during Drop Training in Sec. 3.2; selected to balance quality and resource savings.
  • number_of_views = 6
    The pipeline generates and uses six orthogonal views; this is a fixed design choice.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption For any query point x, there exists a unique closest point on the mesh surface, and orthogonally projecting x onto it yields a consistent texture value.
    In Sec. 3.3.2, the Texture Function is defined by this projection. It is not guaranteed for non-watertight, self-intersecting, or thin meshes.
  • domain assumption The texture function is a view-independent diffuse albedo; lighting effects are removed before the LTM stage.
    The LTM is trained to predict diffuse colors from multi-view images, assuming the first stage has already 'delighted' the generated images.
  • domain assumption The multi-view images generated by the first stage are geometrically consistent with the input mesh.
    The LTM receives these images as conditioning; any inconsistency would degrade the final texture. The paper relies on the success of the first stage without a quantitative consistency check.
  • domain assumption The training datasets (Objaverse meshes and Craftsman-generated meshes) are representative of the test distributions.
    Generalization is claimed across diverse mesh sources, but the training distribution is not fully specified, and only 78 artist meshes and 30 generated meshes are used for evaluation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of UniTEX: Universal High Fidelity Generative Texturing for 3D Shapes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D6L4PQXP

@misc{pith2026250523253,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: UniTEX: Universal High Fidelity Generative Texturing for 3D Shapes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D6L4PQXP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23253}
}
read the original abstract

We present UniTEX, a novel two-stage 3D texture generation framework to create high-quality, consistent textures for 3D assets. Existing approaches predominantly rely on UV-based inpainting to refine textures after reprojecting the generated multi-view images onto the 3D shapes, which introduces challenges related to topological ambiguity. To address this, we propose to bypass the limitations of UV mapping by operating directly in a unified 3D functional space. Specifically, we first propose that lifts texture generation into 3D space via Texture Functions (TFs)--a continuous, volumetric representation that maps any 3D point to a texture value based solely on surface proximity, independent of mesh topology. Then, we propose to predict these TFs directly from images and geometry inputs using a transformer-based Large Texturing Model (LTM). To further enhance texture quality and leverage powerful 2D priors, we develop an advanced LoRA-based strategy for efficiently adapting large-scale Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) for high-quality multi-view texture synthesis as our first stage. Extensive experiments demonstrate that UniTEX achieves superior visual quality and texture integrity compared to existing approaches, offering a generalizable and scalable solution for automated 3D texture generation. Code will available in: https://github.com/YixunLiang/UniTEX.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.23253 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. UniTEX generates high-quality and complete textures for both artist-created low-polygon mesh (the van shell) and generative high-polygon meshes (robots, toy bear, bust and roadsign). Abstract We present UniTEX, a novel two-stage 3D texture gener￾ation framework to create high-quality, consistent textures for 3D assets. Existing approaches predominantly rely on UV-based inpainting to refine textures after reprojectin… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. UV-based texturing models perform well on in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overall pipeline of UniTEX. Given a textureless geometry and reference image, UniTEX first generates a high-fidelity multi-view [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pipeline of the Large Texturing Model. Given a par [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualized example of the Texture Functions (TF) for represent the texture for the whole 3D space. (a) A textured mesh. (b) Unsigned Distance Function (UDF) samples representing 3D geometry. (c) Inspired by UDF, we define texture as a continuous function over 3D space …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison of our method against state-of-the-art (Paint3D [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative comparison of refinement stage across different methods. In the first case, automatically unwrapping makes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative results of stylized texturing. We evaluate our method with various input images and our method can robustly generate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Visualization of the effectiveness of Texture Func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Global Pose Control for Generative View Synthesis in Normalized Object Coordinate Space

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A diffusion image-editing model conditioned on Plücker ray-map tokens and text-defined NOCS fronts generates high-fidelity novel views with absolute global pose control from unposed inputs.

  2. PoseMaster: A Unified 3D Native Framework for Stylized Pose Generation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PoseMaster produces a 3D character mesh from one image and a target 3D skeleton, preserving identity and pose in a single unified model, and it outperforms two-stage 2D-to-3D baselines on the VRoid pose canonicalizati...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Meta 3d texturegen: Fast and consistent texture generation for 3d objects

    Raphael Bensadoun, Yanir Kleiman, Idan Azuri, Omri Harosh, Andrea Vedaldi, Natalia Neverova, and Oran Gafni. Meta 3d texturegen: Fast and consistent texture generation for 3d objects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02430, 2024. 2, 3, 7

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Texfusion: Synthesizing 3d textures with text-guided image diffusion models

    Tianshi Cao, Karsten Kreis, Sanja Fidler, Nicholas Sharp, and Kangxue Yin. Texfusion: Synthesizing 3d textures with text-guided image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 4169–4181, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Text2tex: Text-driven texture synthesis via diffusion models

    Dave Zhenyu Chen, Yawar Siddiqui, Hsin-Ying Lee, Sergey Tulyakov, and Matthias Nießner. Text2tex: Text-driven texture synthesis via diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 18558–18568, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Fan- tasia3d: Disentangling geometry and appearance for high- quality text-to-3d content creation

    Rui Chen, Yongwei Chen, Ningxin Jiao, and Kui Jia. Fan- tasia3d: Disentangling geometry and appearance for high- quality text-to-3d content creation. In ICCV, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Dora: Sampling and benchmarking for 3d shape variational auto-encoders

    Rui Chen, Jianfeng Zhang, Yixun Liang, Guan Luo, Weiyu Li, Jiarui Liu, Xiu Li, Xiaoxiao Long, Jiashi Feng, and Ping Tan. Dora: Sampling and benchmarking for 3d shape variational auto-encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17808,

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Longlora: Efficient fine- tuning of long-context large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12307, 2023

    Yukang Chen, Shengju Qian, Haotian Tang, Xin Lai, Zhi- jian Liu, Song Han, and Jiaya Jia. Longlora: Efficient fine- tuning of long-context large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12307, 2023. 4

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Mvpaint: Synchronized multi-view diffusion for painting anything 3d

    Wei Cheng, Juncheng Mu, Xianfang Zeng, Xin Chen, Anqi Pang, Chi Zhang, Zhibin Wang, Bin Fu, Gang Yu, Ziwei Liu, and Liang Pan. Mvpaint: Synchronized multi-view diffusion for painting anything 3d. arXiv preprint arxiv:2411.02336,

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Objaverse: A universe of annotated 3d objects

    Matt Deitke, Dustin Schwenk, Jordi Salvador, Luca Weihs, Oscar Michel, Eli VanderBilt, Ludwig Schmidt, Kiana Ehsani, Aniruddha Kembhavi, and Ali Farhadi. Objaverse: A universe of annotated 3d objects. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 13142–13153, 2023. 7

    2023

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Flashtex: Fast relightable mesh texturing with lightcontrolnet

    Kangle Deng, Timothy Omernick, Alexander Weiss, Deva Ramanan, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Maneesh Agrawala. Flashtex: Fast relightable mesh texturing with lightcontrolnet. In European Conference on Computer Vi- sion, pages 90–107. Springer, 2024. 3

    2024

  2. [10]

    Tsd-sr: One-step diffusion with target score distillation for real-world image super-resolution

    Linwei Dong, Qingnan Fan, Yihong Guo, Zhonghao Wang, Qi Zhang, Jinwei Chen, Yawei Luo, and Changqing Zou. Tsd-sr: One-step diffusion with target score distillation for real-world image super-resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18263, 2024. 3, 4

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Scaling recti- fied flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis

    Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas M ¨uller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Dominik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, et al. Scaling recti- fied flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. In Forty-first international conference on mach...

  4. [12]

    Hyper3d: Efficient 3d representation via hybrid triplane and octree fea- ture for enhanced 3d shape variational auto-encoders

    Jingyu Guo, Sensen Gao, Jia-Wang Bian, Wanhu Sun, He- liang Zheng, Rongfei Jia, and Mingming Gong. Hyper3d: Efficient 3d representation via hybrid triplane and octree fea- ture for enhanced 3d shape variational auto-encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10403, 2025. 5

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Lrm: Large reconstruction model for single image to 3d

    Yicong Hong, Kai Zhang, Jiuxiang Gu, Sai Bi, Yang Zhou, Difan Liu, Feng Liu, Kalyan Sunkavalli, Trung Bui, and Hao Tan. Lrm: Large reconstruction model for single image to 3d. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04400, 2023. 5

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Re- thinking fid: Towards a better evaluation metric for image generation

    Sadeep Jayasumana, Srikumar Ramalingam, Andreas Veit, Daniel Glasner, Ayan Chakrabarti, and Sanjiv Kumar. Re- thinking fid: Towards a better evaluation metric for image generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 930...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Dimer: Disentangled mesh reconstruction model

    Lutao Jiang, Jiantao Lin, Kanghao Chen, Wenhang Ge, Xin Yang, Yifan Jiang, Yuanhuiyi Lyu, Xu Zheng, and Yingcong Chen. Dimer: Disentangled mesh reconstruction model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17670, 2025. 2, 5, 10

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Repurpos- ing diffusion-based image generators for monocular depth estimation

    Bingxin Ke, Anton Obukhov, Shengyu Huang, Nando Met- zger, Rodrigo Caye Daudt, and Konrad Schindler. Repurpos- ing diffusion-based image generators for monocular depth estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 9492...

    2024

  9. [17]

    Instant-3d: Instant neural radiance field training towards on- device ar/vr 3d reconstruction

    Sixu Li, Chaojian Li, Wenbo Zhu, Boyang Yu, Yang Zhao, Cheng Wan, Haoran You, Huihong Shi, and Yingyan Lin. Instant-3d: Instant neural radiance field training towards on- device ar/vr 3d reconstruction. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual International Symposium on Computer Arch...

    2023

  10. [18]

    Sweet- dreamer: Aligning geometric priors in 2d diffusion for con- sistent text-to-3d

    Weiyu Li, Rui Chen, Xuelin Chen, and Ping Tan. Sweet- dreamer: Aligning geometric priors in 2d diffusion for con- sistent text-to-3d. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02596 , 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Craftsman: High-fidelity mesh generation with 3d native generation and interactive geometry refiner

    Weiyu Li, Jiarui Liu, Rui Chen, Yixun Liang, Xuelin Chen, Ping Tan, and Xiaoxiao Long. Craftsman: High-fidelity mesh generation with 3d native generation and interactive geometry refiner. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14979, 2024. 2, 5, 7

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Triposg: High-fidelity 3d shape synthesis using large-scale rectified flow models

    Yangguang Li, Zi-Xin Zou, Zexiang Liu, Dehu Wang, Yuan Liang, Zhipeng Yu, Xingchao Liu, Yuan-Chen Guo, Ding Liang, Wanli Ouyang, et al. Triposg: High-fidelity 3d shape synthesis using large-scale rectified flow models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06608, 2025. 2, 5, 6

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Magic3d: High-resolution text-to-3d content creation

    Chen-Hsuan Lin, Jun Gao, Luming Tang, Towaki Takikawa, Xiaohui Zeng, Xun Huang, Karsten Kreis, Sanja Fidler, Ming-Yu Liu, and Tsung-Yi Lin. Magic3d: High-resolution text-to-3d content creation. In CVPR, 2023. 3

    2023

  14. [22]

    Texoct: Generating textures of 3d models with octree-based diffusion

    Jialun Liu, Chenming Wu, Xinqi Liu, Xing Liu, Jinbo Wu, Haotian Peng, Chen Zhao, Haocheng Feng, Jingtuo Liu, and Errui Ding. Texoct: Generating textures of 3d models with octree-based diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogniti...

    2024

  15. [23]

    One-2-3-45++: Fast single image to 3d objects with consistent multi-view generation and 3d diffusion

    Minghua Liu, Ruoxi Shi, Linghao Chen, Zhuoyang Zhang, Chao Xu, Xinyue Wei, Hansheng Chen, Chong Zeng, Ji- ayuan Gu, and Hao Su. One-2-3-45++: Fast single image to 3d objects with consistent multi-view generation and 3d diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07885, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Meshformer: High-quality mesh generation with 3d-guided reconstruction model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10198, 2024

    Minghua Liu, Chong Zeng, Xinyue Wei, Ruoxi Shi, Ling- hao Chen, Chao Xu, Mengqi Zhang, Zhaoning Wang, Xi- aoshuai Zhang, Isabella Liu, et al. Meshformer: High-quality mesh generation with 3d-guided reconstruction model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10198, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Text-guided texturing by synchronized multi-view diffusion

    Yuxin Liu, Minshan Xie, Hanyuan Liu, and Tien-Tsin Wong. Text-guided texturing by synchronized multi-view diffusion. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers , pages 1–11,

    2024

  18. [26]

    Marching cubes: A high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm

    William E Lorensen and Harvey E Cline. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm. InSem- inal graphics: pioneering efforts that shaped the field, pages 347–353. 1998. 2

    1998

  19. [27]

    Texture fields: Learning tex- ture representations in function space

    Michael Oechsle, Lars Mescheder, Michael Niemeyer, Thilo Strauss, and Andreas Geiger. Texture fields: Learning tex- ture representations in function space. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4531–4540, 2019. 2, 3, 5, 10

    2019

  20. [28]

    On aliased resizing and surprising subtleties in gan evaluation

    Gaurav Parmar, Richard Zhang, and Jun-Yan Zhu. On aliased resizing and surprising subtleties in gan evaluation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 11410–11420, 2022. 7

    2022

  21. [29]

    Merf: Memory-efficient radiance fields for real- time view synthesis in unbounded scenes.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 42(4):1–12, 2023

    Christian Reiser, Rick Szeliski, Dor Verbin, Pratul Srini- vasan, Ben Mildenhall, Andreas Geiger, Jon Barron, and Pe- ter Hedman. Merf: Memory-efficient radiance fields for real- time view synthesis in unbounded scenes.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 42(4):1–12, 2023. 5

    2023

  22. [30]

    Texture: Text-guided texturing of 3d shapes

    Elad Richardson, Gal Metzer, Yuval Alaluf, Raja Giryes, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Texture: Text-guided texturing of 3d shapes. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 conference proceedings, pages 1–11, 2023. 3

    2023

  23. [31]

    High-resolution image syn- thesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image syn- thesis with latent diffusion models. In CVPR, 2022. 2, 3

    2022

  24. [32]

    Texturify: Generating textures on 3d shape surfaces

    Yawar Siddiqui, Justus Thies, Fangchang Ma, Qi Shan, Matthias Nießner, and Angela Dai. Texturify: Generating textures on 3d shape surfaces. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 72–88. Springer, 2022. 3, 5

    2022

  25. [33]

    Ominicontrol: Minimal and uni- versal control for diffusion transformer

    Zhenxiong Tan, Songhua Liu, Xingyi Yang, Qiaochu Xue, and Xinchao Wang. Ominicontrol: Minimal and uni- versal control for diffusion transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15098, 2024. 4

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Mvdiffusion++: A dense high- resolution multi-view diffusion model for single or sparse- view 3d object reconstruction

    Shitao Tang, Jiacheng Chen, Dilin Wang, Chengzhou Tang, Fuyang Zhang, Yuchen Fan, Vikas Chandra, Yasutaka Fu- rukawa, and Rakesh Ranjan. Mvdiffusion++: A dense high- resolution multi-view diffusion model for single or sparse- view 3d object reconstruction. In European Conferen...

    2024

  27. [35]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. TIP, 2004. 7

    2004

  28. [36]

    Crm: Single image to 3d textured mesh with convolutional reconstruction model

    Zhengyi Wang, Yikai Wang, Yifei Chen, Chendong Xi- ang, Shuo Chen, Dajiang Yu, Chongxuan Li, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. Crm: Single image to 3d textured mesh with convolutional reconstruction model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05034, 2024. 3, 5

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Texgaussian: Generating high-quality pbr mate- rial via octree-based 3d gaussian splatting

    Bojun Xiong, Jialun Liu, Jiakui Hu, Chenming Wu, Jinbo Wu, Xing Liu, Chen Zhao, Errui Ding, and Zhouhui Lian. Texgaussian: Generating high-quality pbr mate- rial via octree-based 3d gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19654, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Texture generation on 3d meshes with point- uv diffusion

    Xin Yu, Peng Dai, Wenbo Li, Lan Ma, Zhengzhe Liu, and Xiaojuan Qi. Texture generation on 3d meshes with point- uv diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4206–4216, 2023. 3, 10

    2023

  31. [39]

    Texgen: a generative diffusion model for mesh textures

    Xin Yu, Ze Yuan, Yuan-Chen Guo, Ying-Tian Liu, Jianhui Liu, Yangguang Li, Yan-Pei Cao, Ding Liang, and Xiaojuan Qi. Texgen: a generative diffusion model for mesh textures. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 43(6):1–14, 2024. 2, 3, 7, 9

    2024

  32. [40]

    Paint3d: Paint anything 3d with lighting-less texture diffusion models

    Xianfang Zeng, Xin Chen, Zhongqi Qi, Wen Liu, Zibo Zhao, Zhibin Wang, Bin Fu, Yong Liu, and Gang Yu. Paint3d: Paint anything 3d with lighting-less texture diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 4252–4262,...

    2024

  33. [41]

    3dshape2vecset: A 3d shape representation for neu- ral fields and generative diffusion models.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 42(4):1–16, 2023

    Biao Zhang, Jiapeng Tang, Matthias Niessner, and Peter Wonka. 3dshape2vecset: A 3d shape representation for neu- ral fields and generative diffusion models.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 42(4):1–16, 2023. 5

    2023

  34. [42]

    Texpainter: Generative mesh texturing with multi-view consistency

    Hongkun Zhang, Zherong Pan, Congyi Zhang, Lifeng Zhu, and Xifeng Gao. Texpainter: Generative mesh texturing with multi-view consistency. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Confer- ence Papers, pages 1–11, 2024. 3, 6

    2024

  35. [43]

    Clay: A controllable large-scale generative model for creat- ing high-quality 3d assets

    Longwen Zhang, Ziyu Wang, Qixuan Zhang, Qiwei Qiu, Anqi Pang, Haoran Jiang, Wei Yang, Lan Xu, and Jingyi Yu. Clay: A controllable large-scale generative model for creat- ing high-quality 3d assets. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 43(4):1–20, 2024. 3

    2024

  36. [44]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shecht- man, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion, pages 586–595, 2018. 7

    2018

  37. [45]

    Dreammat: High-quality pbr material generation with geometry-and light-aware diffusion models

    Yuqing Zhang, Yuan Liu, Zhiyu Xie, Lei Yang, Zhongyuan Liu, Mengzhou Yang, Runze Zhang, Qilong Kou, Cheng Lin, Wenping Wang, et al. Dreammat: High-quality pbr material generation with geometry-and light-aware diffusion models. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 43(4):1–18, 2024. 3

    2024

  38. [46]

    Easycontrol: Adding efficient and flexible control for diffusion transformer

    Yuxuan Zhang, Yirui Yuan, Yiren Song, Haofan Wang, and Jiaming Liu. Easycontrol: Adding efficient and flexible control for diffusion transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07027, 2025. 4

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Hunyuan3d 2.0: Scaling diffu- sion models for high resolution textured 3d assets generation

    Zibo Zhao, Zeqiang Lai, Qingxiang Lin, Yunfei Zhao, Haolin Liu, Shuhui Yang, Yifei Feng, Mingxin Yang, Sheng Zhang, Xianghui Yang, et al. Hunyuan3d 2.0: Scaling diffu- sion models for high resolution textured 3d assets generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12202, 2025. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    clip-score: CLIP Score for Py- Torch

    SUN Zhengwentai. clip-score: CLIP Score for Py- Torch. https : / / github . com / taited / clip - score, 2023. Version 0.2.1. 7

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.