Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Roughening and dynamics of an electric flux string in a (2+1)D lattice gauge theory

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a (2+1)-dimensional $</span>$Z_2$ lattice gauge theory, the electric flux string roughens at $g \approx 0.91$ and its excitations then behave as a single massless boson with central charge $c \approx 1$, a crossover visible in both the…

desk verdict Static results are solid confirmation of the standard roughening picture, but the new dynamical claim rests on an entropy slope that the paper's own convergence data do not yet support. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23853 v1 pith:ICXDKH3S submitted 2025-05-29 hep-lat cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thquant-ph

Francesco Di Marcantonio , Sunny Pradhan , Sofia Vallecorsa , Mari Carmen Bañuls , Enrique Rico Ortega This is my paper
classification hep-latcond-mat.stat-mechhep-thquant-ph PACS 11.15.Ha
keywords Z2latticegaugetheoryrougheningtransitionelectricfluxstringentanglemententropymatrixproductstatesLüschercorrectionBKTquantumquenchdynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the electric flux string that binds two static charges in a pure $Z_2$ lattice gauge theory in $(2+1)$ dimensions, using matrix-product-state simulations of the dual transverse-field Ising model. It tries to establish that, as the gauge coupling is lowered toward deconfinement, the string undergoes a roughening transition at $g \approx 0.91$ distinct from the deconfinement transition at $g_c \approx 0.5731$: above the roughening point the string is stiff, while below it the string becomes floppy and its transverse fluctuations are massless. Four static observations support this picture: the string width grows logarithmically with charge separation, the ground-state entanglement entropy scales as $(c/6) \log R$ with $c \approx 1$, the confining potential acquires the universal Lüscher correction of $-\pi/12$ per transverse direction, and the kink mass vanishes so rotational symmetry is restored. A dynamical observation adds to it: after a local quench that creates the string from the vacuum, the entanglement entropy grows linearly in time with a rate $0.97(5)$ essentially independent of the coupling in the roughening region, whereas in the deeply confined regime the rate decreases with $g$. The relevance is that a confining flux tube has its own quantum phase, and its low-energy description as a $(1+1)$-dimensional massless boson is visible in both static and dynamical quantities.

What carries the argument

The working horse is the duality between the $Z_2$ lattice gauge theory and a $(2+1)$-dimensional transverse-field Ising model, in which static charges become a defect line (the string path $\Gamma$) and the quench becomes a change from ferromagnetic to antiferromagnetic couplings along $\Gamma$; the authors simulate this dual model with matrix product states, using a vertical-strip mapping with periodic boundary conditions in the transverse direction. The main analytic instrument is the conformal-field-theory description of the effective string: identifying the string excitations with one massless boson in $1+1$ dimensions predicts $S \sim (c/6) \log R$ for entanglement, a Casimir term of $-\pi/24$ per transverse direction (rescaled to $-\pi/12$ here by the Hamiltonian speed of sound), and linear entropy growth after a quench. The BKT character of the roughening transition enters through the exponential closing of the kink mass, $\Delta(g) \sim A \exp(-b/\sqrt{g-g_r})$, which locates $g_r \approx 0.91$.

What would settle it

Repeat the quench protocol with bond dimension 512 or higher and extract the entanglement-growth slope in the roughening region: if the slope shifts appreciably or becomes $g$-dependent once the entropy is converged, the $c \approx 1$ dynamical claim fails. A purely static check is to compute the central charge on cylinders with larger transverse size and longer strings; if the plateau moves away from $c = 1$ as finite-size effects are reduced, the bosonic description is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the crossover region $g_c < g \lesssim g_r$, sometimes called the roughening region, the electric flux string behaves as a gapless bosonic $(1+1)$-dimensional system with central charge $c \approx 1$, even though the bulk gauge theory remains gapped and confining. The authors show that the ground-state entropy follows $S \sim (c/6) \log R$ with a central-charge plateau at $c \approx 1$; that the confining potential fits $V = \sigma R + \beta + \gamma/R$ with $\gamma$ approaching $-\pi/12$, the universal Casimir value for one massless bosonic transverse mode rescaled by a speed of sound $v_s \approx 2$; that the string width grows logarithmically with $R$; and that the kink mass, the energy difference between an on-axis and an off-axis string, extrapolates to zero as $R \to \infty$, signalling restoration of rotational symmetry. Dynamically, a local quench that inserts the string into the interacting vacuum produces linear growth of entanglement entropy at a rate near $0.97(5)$ that is independent of the coupling inside the roughening region, matching the behaviour expected for a critical one-dimensional system, while the width of the string grows at a coupling-dependent rate. Together these results identify roughening as a Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless-type transition of the effective string, not a bulk phase transition.

Load-bearing premise

The argument as a whole rests on the assumption that the bond-dimension truncation in the time evolution does not yet distort the intermediate-time window from which the entanglement-growth rates are extracted; the paper's own error analysis shows the entropy is not converged in bond dimension for times beyond about 4, so a distortion of that window would weaken the dynamical distinction between the roughening and confined regimes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Below $g_r \approx 0.91$ the string's low-energy physics is that of one free massless boson, so the flux tube's correlation functions and finite-size spectrum should follow $c=1$ conformal predictions rather than the stiff-string phenomenology of strong coupling.
  • The confining potential in the crossover region is fixed up to a non-universal sound speed: the Lüscher coefficient $\gamma \approx -\pi/12$ is universal once $v_s \approx 2$, so the same plateau should appear for any lattice gauge theory in $2+1$ dimensions with a single transverse direction.
  • Rotational symmetry restoration is quantitative: on-axis and off-axis potentials agree within the roughening region, so the lattice orientation no longer affects the static force between charges below $g_r$.
  • After a local string quench, entanglement grows at a rate close to 1 independent of $g$ and $R$ in the roughening region, a fingerprint that can distinguish floppy strings from stiff ones without resolving the string profile.
  • String-width dynamics is not a good probe of the crossover on its own, since its growth rate keeps depending on $g$; the entanglement rate is the cleaner discriminator.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not extract the entanglement velocity or the sound speed directly from the linear-growth slope; comparing $v_s$ from the Lüscher term with the entanglement-growth rate may give a sharper test of the boson picture than either measurement alone.
  • Because the static central-charge plateau saturates only on wider cylinders, the authors' $c \approx 1$ plateau should move closer to $g_c$ and flatten further as the transverse size $N$ grows; a converged large-$N$, large-$L$ study could strengthen or weaken the claim.
  • The same protocol applied to off-axis strings, which are rough by construction, could test whether the linear entanglement growth appears at all couplings for off-axis charges, sharpening the dynamical signature.
  • If the effective boson is universal, similar entropy-growth plateaus should appear for other gauge groups, such as $U(1)$ or $SU(2)$ in $2+1$ dimensions, connecting the roughening crossover to the broader question of string dynamics in confining theories.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the roughening transition in the (2+1)D pure Z2 lattice gauge theory using matrix product state simulations of the dual Ising model. Static results include a logarithmically growing string width, an entanglement entropy whose logarithmic coefficient suggests central charge c≈1, a confining potential with a Lüscher-like 1/R term, and a kink-mass analysis indicating restoration of rotational symmetry with a BKT estimate g_r≈0.91. Dynamically, the authors prepare a string by a local quench from the vacuum and use TEBD to observe that the entanglement entropy grows approximately linearly with time in the roughening region with a slope 0.97(5) that appears independent of g, while in the strongly confined region the growth rate decreases with g. The paper concludes that the string excitations are effectively described by a massless bosonic theory in the roughening region.

Significance. If the claims are fully supported, the paper would be a valuable demonstration that tensor networks can capture both static universal features of roughening and qualitative dynamical signatures of a massless effective string. Strengths include the use of several complementary observables (width, entropy, potential, rotational symmetry), explicit finite-size and bond-dimension checks in Appendix E, and a public code repository. The static evidence for the roughening region is credible, but the central dynamical claim about the g-independent entropy-growth rate is currently less secure because the TEBD simulations are not converged in bond dimension over the relevant time window. The extracted central charge and Lüscher coefficient are also presented as consistency checks rather than parameter-free derivations, which is appropriate but should be stated more carefully.

major comments (3)
  1. [IV A, Fig. 7a; Appendix E.3, Fig. 16f] The central dynamical result—the g-independent entropy-growth rate 0.97(5) in the roughening region—is not yet established because the TEBD data are not converged in bond dimension over the relevant time window. Appendix E.3 states that the entanglement entropy 'does not converge in bond dimension for t ≳ 4' for g=0.80, R=10, N=6 at χ=128 versus 256, while Fig. 7a uses χ=128 for the roughening-region curves with the same R and N=5. A fixed-χ truncation generically caps further entropy growth, so curves with different physical growth rates can appear to share a common slope if the fit extends into the non-converged regime. The manuscript does not report the individual slopes, the per-g fit ranges, or a χ-extrapolation of the slope. Please provide convergence checks on the actual fit window (for example χ=256 and χ=512 for g=0.75, 0.8, 0.9) and report the resulting slopes with uncertainties.
  2. [III C, Eqs. (16)–(17), Fig. 5b] The claim of observing the universal Lüscher term is weaker than it appears because the plateau at γ=-π/12 is converted into the universal value by the speed of sound v_s≈2, and v_s is inferred from the same plateau rather than independently measured. Since v_s is non-universal in the Hamiltonian lattice formulation, a fit with a free velocity cannot by itself confirm the universal -π/24(D-2) coefficient. An independent determination of v_s (for example from the string spectrum or from the lattice action) or an explicit calculation of the expected γ in the Hamiltonian formulation would be needed for the static prong to be a parameter-free confirmation of c=1.
  3. [III D and Appendix D, Eq. (D1), Figs. 6d–e] The estimate of the roughening point g_r≈0.907(1) rests on a fifth-order polynomial extrapolation of m_k(R) to R→∞ using data at R=10–20, and the appendix itself warns that the extrapolation yields slightly negative values of order 10^-3–10^-4 in [0.8,0.925] and that the result is sensitive to the polynomial order. Because g_r is used to delimit the roughening region in the dynamical discussion, the sensitivity of the BKT-fit parameters (g_r, A, b) to the extrapolation order should be quantified, or g_r should be determined by a more controlled method.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (21)] The sentence 'where A and b are to constant to be determined' contains a typo; it should read 'are constants to be determined'.
  2. [Fig. 7a] The shaded linear-growth window is not defined quantitatively in the main text; please specify the fit range in t for each coupling and state how the slope and its uncertainty were obtained.
  3. [Fig. 4a] The caption appears to contain a stray label 'central charge vs. g' that does not correspond to any panel; the panel labels in the figure should be made consistent with the caption.
  4. [IV A] The simulations in Fig. 7a use δt=0.01 for g=0.75,0.8,0.9 but δt=0.02 for g=1.0,1.2; since Appendix E.3 shows that Trotter step affects some observables, the different time steps should be justified or the analysis should confirm that the entropy slope is insensitive to δt for all couplings.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: extracted parameters are compared with, not used to define, the theoretical predictions.

full rationale

The paper's quantitative claims are obtained by fitting MPS ground-state and TEBD time-evolution data to standard closed-form expressions from external literature: S = (c/6) log(R) from CFT [94-98], V = sigma R + beta + gamma/R with gamma = -pi/24(D-2) from effective string theory [20,29,30,34,99-101], and BKT gap scaling for the kink mass [90]. In each case the parameter (c, gamma, g_r, the entropy-growth slope) is extracted from the data and then compared with an independent theoretical value; it is not inserted as an input and recovered as an output. The dynamical slope 0.97(5) is a direct measurement of S(t) and is compared only qualitatively with the general linear-growth expectation for critical 1D systems [107]; no equation in the paper defines the slope in terms of the bosonic model. The statement that the results are 'consistent with' a massless boson description is an interpretive comparison, not a derivation whose output equals its input. The only caveat is numerical rather than logical: Appendix E.3 reports that the dynamic entanglement entropy is not converged in bond dimension for t ≳ 4, which affects the reliability of the extracted slope but is a truncation-error concern, not circularity. No load-bearing self-citation chain was found; references to the authors' prior work (e.g., [64,98]) are background and do not force the conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the known gauge/Ising duality, the effective massless-boson description of the rough string, and the numerical fidelity of narrow-cylinder MPS/TEBD simulations. The main unaccounted-for input is the speed of sound v_s, inferred from the measured Lüscher coefficient, plus the usual fit parameters for the BKT estimate.

free parameters (4)
  • speed of sound v_s = approximately 2 (inferred from gamma approximately -pi/12)
    The Hamiltonian-formula for the Lüscher term is -pi v_s/24 per transverse direction; since the plateau is -pi/12, v_s is set to 2. No independent determination from the string spectrum is provided.
  • central charge c = approximately 1 (from S vs log R)
    Extracted via S ~ (c/6) log R in Fig. 4d; used as evidence for the bosonic description.
  • BKT fit parameters (g_r, A, b) = g_r = 0.907(1), A = 11(2), b = 1.44(6)
    Fit of m_k(R to infinity) to Delta(g) ~ A exp(-b/sqrt(g - g_r)) in Sect. III D and Appendix D.
  • kink-mass extrapolation polynomial coefficients a_1..a_5 = not reported
    Fifth-order polynomial in 1/R used to extrapolate m_k(R to infinity); the polynomial coefficients are fit parameters.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Z2 LGT in 2+1D is dual to the quantum Ising model, including with static charges implemented via phase factors.
    Invoked in Sect. II A and Appendix A; the duality is a known exact mapping (Refs. [84-87]).
  • domain assumption In the roughening phase the string is described at low energies by a massless free boson with central charge c = 1.
    Used in Sec. III B/C/IV to interpret the values c approximately 1, gamma = -pi/12 and the linear entropy growth; this is the established effective-string picture (Refs. [20,25,99-104]), not something the paper proves.
  • domain assumption The narrow-cylinder geometry (N = 4..6) with periodic boundary conditions and finite bond dimension is representative of the thermodynamic-limit string dynamics.
    Throughout Sec. III and IV; convergence in N and chi is only partially shown (Appendix E), and the extent of the roughening region depends on N.
  • domain assumption The local quench from the vacuum sector to the two-charge sector is equivalent to applying a string operator on the vacuum and produces only string-localized dynamics.
    Sect. IV, Eq. (22); the bulk is assumed to remain mostly stationary.
  • ad hoc to paper The kink mass m_k(R) can be extrapolated to R to infinity with a fifth-order polynomial in 1/R.
    Appendix D, Eq. (D1); no derivation is given for this scaling form, and the paper notes the extrapolation yields small negative values near the transition.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Roughening and dynamics of an electric flux string in a (2+1)D lattice gauge theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ICXDKH3S

@misc{pith2026250523853,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Roughening and dynamics of an electric flux string in a (2+1)D lattice gauge theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ICXDKH3S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23853}
}
abstract

We investigate the roughening transition in the pure $\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory in (2+1) dimensions. Using numerical simulations with matrix product states, we explore the static and dynamical properties of an electric flux string between two static charges as the coupling is varied and approaches the deconfinement phase transition from the confined phase. Within the roughening region, we obtain the universal L\"uscher correction to the confining potential and observe the expected restoration of rotational symmetry. Our simulations of the out-of-equilibrium evolution of a string reveal that the growth of the entanglement entropy of the state and the string width exhibit qualitatively different behavior in the roughening region compared to the deeply confined one. In particular, we find that the rate of entropy growth is consistent with an effective description of the string excitations by a bosonic model in the roughening phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.23853 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Phase diagram of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Picture of plaquette and link operators in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Cartoon picture of the setup. From the vacuum of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Numerical results on the string width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Numerical results on the confining potential ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Different string configurations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Electric field in time along a slice of the cylinder: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. In a dual formulation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Scaling of the kink mass as a function of 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Convergence in bond dimension of ’t Hooft and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Convergence in bond dimension of EE for 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Error dynamics in EE and string width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nonlocal Nonstabilizerness from Holographic Schwinger Pair Production

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    In holographic Schwinger pair production, the excess capacity of entanglement is √λ(d−2)/(d−1)³ — positive for d>2, zero for d=2 — so the produced pair carries nonlocal magic for d>2.

  2. Ground state preparation in $(2+1)$-dimensional pure $\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory via deterministic quantum imaginary time evolution

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Deterministic QITE with a Gauss-law-reduced Pauli pool reproduces DMRG ground-state energies of (2+1)-D pure Z2 lattice gauge theory to within 0.1% for ladders of up to 32 qubits and coupling λ ∈ [0.5, 5].

  3. Scaling and Luescher Term in a non-Abelian (2+1)d SU$(2)$ Quantum Link Model

    hep-lat 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In an SU(2) quantum link model on a hexagonal lattice, the static quark potential shows a coupling-dependent Lüscher term and logarithmically growing string width, indicating a rough confining string with no continuum limit.

  4. String Breaking Dynamics and Glueball Formation in a $2+1$D Lattice Gauge Theory

    hep-lat 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a 2+1D Z2 lattice gauge theory, string breaking happens only at specific resonances set by field strength and matter mass, while long strings can dynamically form closed electric loops analogous to glueballs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [83]

    D. Horn, M. Weinstein, and S. Yankielowicz, Hamilto- nian approach toz(n) lattice gauge theories, Physical Review D19, 3715–3731 (1979)

    work page 1979

  2. [1]

    As the physical dimension of our MPS is, as shown in Fig

    V acuum sector analysis For the results of the vacuum sector presented in the previous Appendix B, we use squareobclattices of side N=L= 4,5,6,7 and maximum bond dimension of χ= 64. As the physical dimension of our MPS is, as shown in Fig. 3, 2 N , the larger the transversal size, the more entanglement will build up, and the larger should be the bond dime...

  3. [2]

    The effective string symmetry isU(1) in the thermodynamic limit, but for us the transversal fluctuations are truncated and effectively represented by aZ N gauge group

    Two-particle sector analysis The numerics of the two-particle sector makes use of cylindrical lattices, which allows us to reduce finite size effects in the transversal direction. The effective string symmetry isU(1) in the thermodynamic limit, but for us the transversal fluctuations are truncated and effectively represented by aZ N gauge group. Thus, as ...

  4. [3]

    The Trotterization procedure can greatly affect the expectation values of our observables

    Dynamical error analysis In this section, we see the main limitations of our TEBD algorithm. The Trotterization procedure can greatly affect the expectation values of our observables. From Fig. 16a–d, we see that the string width varies by changing theδt, with a great influence at short times as shown in the inset, but the entanglement entropy con- verges...

  5. [4]

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls, R. Blatt, J. Catani, A. Celi, J. I. Cirac, M. Dalmonte, L. Fallani, K. Jansen, M. Lewenstein, S. Montangero,et al., Simulating lattice gauge theories within quantum technologies, The European Physical Journal D74, 1 (2020)

    2020

  6. [5]

    Towards analog quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories with trapped ions

    Z. Davoudi, M. Hafezi, C. Monroe, G. Pagano, A. Seif, and A. Shaw, Towards analog quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories with trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023015 (2020), arXiv:1908.03210 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  7. [6]

    Funcke, T

    L. Funcke, T. Hartung, K. Jansen, and S. K¨ uhn, Re- view on Quantum Computing for Lattice Field Theory, Proceedings of The 39th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2022)430, 228 (2023), arXiv:2302.00467 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [7]

    S. D. Bass and E. Zohar, Quantum technologies in parti- cle physics, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A380, 20210072 (2022)

    2022

Show all 125 references
  1. [8]

    C. W. Baueret al., Quantum simulation for high- energy physics, PRX Quantum4, 10.1103/prxquan- tum.4.027001 (2023)

    2023 doi

  2. [9]

    J. C. Halimeh, M. Aidelsburger, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and B. Yang, Cold-atom quantum simulators of gauge theories (2023), arXiv:2310.12201

    2023 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Di Meglioet al., Quantum computing for high-energy physics: State of the art and challenges, PRX Quantum 5, 10.1103/prxquantum.5.037001 (2024)

    A. Di Meglioet al., Quantum computing for high-energy physics: State of the art and challenges, PRX Quantum 5, 10.1103/prxquantum.5.037001 (2024)

    2024 doi

  4. [11]

    E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Na- ture534, 516 (2016)

    2016

  5. [12]

    Schweizer, F

    C. Schweizer, F. Grusdt, M. Berngruber, L. Barbiero, E. Demler, N. Goldman, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Floquet approach toZ 2 lattice gauge theories with ul- tracold atoms in optical lattices, Nature Physics15, 1168 (2019)

    2019

  6. [13]

    H.-H. Lu, N. Klco, J. M. Lukens, T. D. Morris, A. Bansal, A. Ekstr¨ om, G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, A. M. Weiner, M. J. Savage, and P. Lougovski, Simulations of subatomic many-body physics on a quantum frequency processor, Phys. Rev. A100, 012320 (2019)

    2019

  7. [14]

    B. Yang, H. Sun, R. Ott, H.-Y. Wang, T. V. Zache, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, P. Hauke, and J.-W. Pan, Obser- vation of gauge invariance in a 71-site bose–hubbard quantum simulator, Nature587, 392–396 (2020)

    2020

  8. [15]

    A. Mil, T. V. Zache, A. Hegde, A. Xia, R. P. Bhatt, M. K. Oberthaler, P. Hauke, J. Berges, and F. Jendrze- jewski, A scalable realization of local u(1) gauge invari- ance in cold atomic mixtures, Science367, 1128 (2020)

    2020

  9. [16]

    B. M. McCoy and T. T. Wu, Two-dimensional ising field theory in a magnetic field: Breakup of the cut in the two-point function, Physical Review D18, 1259–1267 (1978)

    1978

  10. [17]

    S. B. Rutkevich, Energy spectrum of bound-spinons in the quantum ising spin-chain ferromagnet, Journal of Statistical Physics131, 917–939 (2008)

    2008

  11. [18]

    Kormos, M

    M. Kormos, M. Collura, G. Tak´ acs, and P. Calabrese, Real-time confinement following a quantum quench to a non-integrable model, Nature Physics13, 246 (2017)

    2017

  12. [19]

    B. Lake, A. M. Tsvelik, S. Notbohm, D. Alan Tennant, T. G. Perring, M. Reehuis, C. Sekar, G. Krabbes, and B. B¨ uchner, Confinement of fractional quantum number particles in a condensed-matter system, Nature Physics 6, 50–55 (2009)

    2009

  13. [20]

    W. L. Tan, P. Becker, F. Liu, G. Pagano, K. S. Collins, A. De, L. Feng, H. B. Kaplan, A. Kyprianidis, R. Lund- gren, W. Morong, S. Whitsitt, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Domain-wall confinement and dynamics in a quantum simulator, Nature Physics17, 742–747 (2021)

    2021

  14. [21]

    L¨ uscher, G

    M. L¨ uscher, G. M¨ unster, and P. Weisz, How thick are chromo-electric flux tubes?, Nuclear Physics B180, 1–12 (1981)

    1981

  15. [22]

    Hasenfratz, E

    A. Hasenfratz, E. Hasenfratz, and P. Hasenfratz, Gener- alized roughening transition and its effect on the string tension, Nuclear Physics B180, 353–367 (1981)

    1981

  16. [23]

    L¨ uscher, Symmetry-breaking aspects of the rough- ening transition in gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B 180, 317–329 (1981)

    M. L¨ uscher, Symmetry-breaking aspects of the rough- ening transition in gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B 180, 317–329 (1981)

    1981

  17. [24]

    M¨ unster and P

    G. M¨ unster and P. Weisz, On the roughening transition in abelian lattice gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B180, 13–22 (1981)

    1981

  18. [25]

    M¨ unster and P

    G. M¨ unster and P. Weisz, On the roughening transition in non-abelian lattice gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B 180, 330–340 (1981)

    1981

  19. [26]

    Drouffe and J

    J. Drouffe and J. Zuber, Roughening transition in lattice gauge theories in arbitrary dimension: (i). theZ 2 case, Nuclear Physics B180, 253–263 (1981)

    1981

  20. [27]

    Drouffe and J

    J. Drouffe and J. Zuber, Roughening transition in lat- tice gauge theories in arbitrary dimension: (ii). the groupsZ 3,U(1),SU(2),SU(3), Nuclear Physics B180, 264–274 (1981)

    1981

  21. [28]

    S. T. Chui and J. D. Weeks, Phase transition in the two- dimensional coulomb gas, and the interfacial roughening transition, Physical Review B14, 4978–4982 (1976)

    1976

  22. [29]

    Fradkin, Roughening transition in quantum inter- faces, Physical Review B28, 5338–5341 (1983)

    E. Fradkin, Roughening transition in quantum inter- faces, Physical Review B28, 5338–5341 (1983)

    1983

  23. [30]

    Hasenbusch and K

    M. Hasenbusch and K. Pinn, Computing the roughening transition of ising and solid-on-solid models by bcsos model matching, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General30, 63–80 (1997)

    1997

  24. [31]

    Caselle, F

    M. Caselle, F. Gliozzi, U. Magnea, and S. Vinti, Width of long colour flux tubes in lattice gauge systems, Nu- clear Physics B460, 397–412 (1996)

    1996

  25. [32]

    Caselle, R

    M. Caselle, R. Fiore, F. Gliozzi, M. Hasenbusch, and P. Provero, String effects in the wilson loop: a high pre- cision numerical test, Nuclear Physics B486, 245–260 (1997)

    1997

  26. [33]

    Caselle, M

    M. Caselle, M. Hasenbusch, and M. Panero, String ef- fects in the 3d gauge ising model, Journal of High En- ergy Physics2003, 057–057 (2003)

    2003

  27. [34]

    Di Giacomo, M

    A. Di Giacomo, M. Maggiore, and ˇStefan. Olejn ´ ık, Ev- idence for flux tubes from cooled qcd configurations, Physics Letters B236, 199–202 (1990)

    1990

  28. [35]

    Di Giacomo, M

    A. Di Giacomo, M. Maggiore, and ˇStefan. Olejn ´ ık, Con- finement and chromoelectric flux tubes in lattice qcd, Nuclear Physics B347, 441–460 (1990)

    1990

  29. [36]

    Gliozzi, M

    F. Gliozzi, M. Pepe, and U.-J. Wiese, Width of the con- fining string in yang-mills theory, Physical Review Let- ters104, 10.1103/physrevlett.104.232001 (2010)

    2010 doi

  30. [37]

    L¨ uscher and P

    M. L¨ uscher and P. Weisz, Quark confinement and the bosonic string, Journal of High Energy Physics2002, 049–049 (2002). 19

    2002

  31. [38]

    Fukugita and T

    M. Fukugita and T. Niuya, The distribution of chro- moelectric flux in SU(2) lattice gauge theory, Physics Letters B132, 374–378 (1983)

    1983

  32. [39]

    Agostini, G

    V. Agostini, G. Carlino, M. Caselle, and M. Hasen- busch, The spectrum of the 2 + 1-dimensional gauge ising model, Nuclear Physics B484, 331–352 (1997)

    1997

  33. [40]

    Athenodorou, S

    A. Athenodorou, S. Dubovsky, C. Luo, and M. Teper, Excitations of ising strings on a lattice, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 10.1007/jhep05(2023)082 (2023)

    2023 doi

  34. [41]

    Athenodorou, B

    A. Athenodorou, B. Bringoltz, and M. Teper, Closed flux tubes and their string description in D=2+1 SU(N) gauge theories, Journal of High Energy Physics2011, 10.1007/jhep05(2011)042 (2011)

    2011 doi

  35. [42]

    Athenodorou, B

    A. Athenodorou, B. Bringoltz, and M. Teper, The closed string spectrum of SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimen- sions, Physics Letters B656, 132–140 (2007)

    2007

  36. [43]

    T. A. Cochranet al., Visualizing dynamics of charges and strings in (2+1)D lattice gauge theories (2024), arXiv:2409.17142 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [44]

    A. De, A. Lerose, D. Luo, F. M. Surace, A. Schuckert, E. R. Bennewitz, B. Ware, W. Morong, K. S. Collins, Z. Davoudi, A. V. Gorshkov, O. Katz, and C. Monroe, Observation of string-breaking dynamics in a quantum simulator (2024), arXiv:2410.13815 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [45]

    D. G. Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T. V. Zache, B. Braverman, M. Kornjaca, A. Lukin, S. H. Cantu, F. Liu, S. Wang, K. A., M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and A. Bylinskii, Obser- vation of string breaking on a (2 + 1)d rydberg quantum simulator (2024), arXiv:2410.16558 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [46]

    F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice gauge the- ories and string dynamics in rydberg atom quan- tum simulators, Physical Review X10, 10.1103/phys- revx.10.021041 (2020)

    2020 doi

  40. [47]

    Mildenberger, W

    J. Mildenberger, W. Mruczkiewicz, J. C. Halimeh, Z. Jiang, and P. Hauke, Confinement in aZ 2 lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer, Nature Physics 21, 312–317 (2025)

    2025

  41. [48]

    M. Meth, J. Zhang, J. F. Haase, C. Edmunds, L. Postler, A. J. Jena, A. Steiner, L. Dellantonio, R. Blatt, P. Zoller, T. Monz, P. Schindler, C. Muschik, and M. Ringbauer, Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer, Nature Physics 21, 570–576 (2025)

    2025

  42. [49]

    Verstraete, V

    F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. Cirac, Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin sys- tems, Advances in Physics57, 143–224 (2008)

    2008

  43. [50]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

    2011

  44. [51]

    Or´ us, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Annals of Physics349, 117–158 (2014)

    R. Or´ us, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Annals of Physics349, 117–158 (2014)

    2014

  45. [52]

    J. C. Bridgeman and C. T. Chubb, Hand-waving and in- terpretive dance: an introductory course on tensor net- works, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theo- retical50, 223001 (2017), arXiv:1603.03039 [quant-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Silvi, F

    P. Silvi, F. Tschirsich, M. Gerster, J. J¨ unemann, D. Jaschke, M. Rizzi, and S. Montangero, The tensor networks anthology: Simulation techniques for many- body quantum lattice systems, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes 10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.8 (2019)

    2019 doi

  47. [54]

    S.-J. Ran, E. Tirrito, C. Peng, X. Chen, L. Tagliacozzo, G. Su, and M. Lewenstein,Tensor Network Contrac- tions, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer International Publishing, 2020)

    2020

  48. [55]

    J. I. Cirac, D. P´ erez-Garc ´ ıa, N. Schuch, and F. Ver- straete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 045003 (2021), arXiv:2011.12127 [quant-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Okunishi, T

    K. Okunishi, T. Nishino, and U. Hiroshi, Developments in the Tensor Network — from Statistical Mechanics to Quantum Entanglement, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn91, 062001 (2022)

    2022

  50. [57]

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls, Tensor Network Algorithms: A Route Map, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys14, 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040721-022705 (2023)

    2023 doi

  51. [58]

    Carmen Ba˜ nuls and K

    M. Carmen Ba˜ nuls and K. Cichy, Review on novel meth- ods for lattice gauge theories, Reports on Progress in Physics83, 024401 (2020)

    2020

  52. [59]

    Meurice, R

    Y. Meurice, R. Sakai, and J. Unmuth-Yockey, Ten- sor lattice field theory for renormalization and quan- tum computing, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 025005 (2022), arXiv:2010.06539 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Kadoh, Recent progress in the tensor renormaliza- tion group, Proceedings of The 38th International Sym- posium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2021) 396, 633 (2022)

    D. Kadoh, Recent progress in the tensor renormaliza- tion group, Proceedings of The 38th International Sym- posium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2021) 396, 633 (2022)

    2022

  54. [61]

    Felser, P

    T. Felser, P. Silvi, M. Collura, and S. Montangero, Two- Dimensional Quantum-Link Lattice Quantum Electro- dynamics at Finite Density, Phys. Rev. X10, 041040 (2020), arXiv:1911.09693 [quant-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Robaina, M

    D. Robaina, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, and J. I. Cirac, Simu- lating 2+1DZ 3 lattice gauge theory with an infinite projected entangled-pair state, Physical Review Letters 126, 10.1103/physrevlett.126.050401 (2021)

    2021 doi

  56. [63]

    Magnifico, T

    G. Magnifico, T. Felser, P. Silvi, and S. Montangero, Lattice quantum electrodynamics in (3+1)-dimensions at finite density with tensor networks, Nature Commu- nications12, 3600 (2021), arXiv:2011.10658 [hep-lat]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Emonts, A

    P. Emonts, A. Kelman, U. Borla, S. Moroz, S. Gazit, and E. Zohar, Finding the ground state of a lattice gauge theory with fermionic tensor networks: A 2 + 1D Z2 demonstration, Phys. Rev. D107, 014505 (2023), arXiv:2211.00023 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Kelman, U

    A. Kelman, U. Borla, I. Gomelski, J. Elyovich, G. Roose, P. Emonts, and E. Zohar, Gauged gaussian projected entangled pair states: A high dimensional ten- sor network formulation for lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D110, 054511 (2024), arXiv:2404.13123 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Akiyama, Y

    S. Akiyama, Y. Meurice, and R. Sakai, Tensor renor- malization group for fermions, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter36, 343002 (2024), arXiv:2401.08542 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Pichler, M

    T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Zoller, and S. Montangero, Real-time dynamics in u(1) lattice gauge theories with tensor networks, Physical Review X6, 10.1103/physrevx.6.011023 (2016)

    2016 doi

  61. [68]

    Chanda, J

    T. Chanda, J. Zakrzewski, M. Lewenstein, and L. Tagli- acozzo, Confinement and Lack of Thermalization after Quenches in the Bosonic Schwinger Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 180602 (2020)

    2020

  62. [69]

    Notarnicola, M

    S. Notarnicola, M. Collura, and S. Montangero, Real-time-dynamics quantum simulation of (1 + 1)-dimensional lattice QED with Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013288 (2020). 20

    2020

  63. [70]

    Rigobello, S

    M. Rigobello, S. Notarnicola, G. Magnifico, and S. Mon- tangero, Entanglement generation in (1+1)D QED scat- tering processes, Phys. Rev. D104, 114501 (2021)

    2021

  64. [71]

    Belyansky, S

    R. Belyansky, S. Whitsitt, N. Mueller, A. Fahimniya, E. R. Bennewitz, Z. Davoudi, and A. V. Gorshkov, High-Energy Collision of Quarks and Hadrons in the Schwinger Model: From Tensor Networks to Cir- cuit QED, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2307.02522 (2023)

    2023 doi arXiv

  65. [72]

    Barata and E

    J. Barata and E. Rico, Real-time simulation of jet en- ergy loss and entropy production in high-energy scat- tering with matter, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17558 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Papaefstathiou, J

    I. Papaefstathiou, J. Knolle, and M. C. Ba˜ nuls, Real- time scattering in the lattice schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D111, 014504 (2025)

    2025

  67. [74]

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, C. J. D. Lin, and M. Schneider, Parton distribution functions in the schwinger model from tensor network states (2025), arXiv:2504.07508 [hep-lat]

    2025

  68. [75]

    J. B. Kogut, D. K. Sinclair, R. B. Pearson, J. L. Richardson, and J. Shigemitsu, Fluctuating string of lattice gauge theory: The heavy-quark potential, the restoration of rotational symmetry, and roughening, Physical Review D23, 2945–2961 (1981)

    1981

  69. [76]

    W.-T. Xu, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Tensor-network study of the roughening transition in (2 + 1)d lattice gauge theories (2025), arXiv:2503.19027 [cond-mat.str- el]

    2025 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Sugihara, Matrix product representation of gauge in- variant states in aZ 2 lattice gauge theory, Journal of High Energy Physics2005, 022–022 (2005)

    T. Sugihara, Matrix product representation of gauge in- variant states in aZ 2 lattice gauge theory, Journal of High Energy Physics2005, 022–022 (2005)

    2005

  71. [78]

    Tagliacozzo and G

    L. Tagliacozzo and G. Vidal, Entanglement renormal- ization and gauge symmetry, Phys. Rev. B83, 115127 (2011)

    2011

  72. [79]

    Wu and W.-Y

    Y. Wu and W.-Y. Liu, Accurate gauge-invariant tensor network simulations for abelian lattice gauge theory in (2+1)d (2025), arXiv:2503.20566 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Y. Liu, Y. Meurice, M. P. Qin, J. Unmuth-Yockey, T. Xiang, Z. Y. Xie, J. F. Yu, and H. Zou, Exact block- ing formulas for spin and gauge models, Phys. Rev. D 88, 056005 (2013)

    2013

  74. [81]

    Borla, J

    U. Borla, J. J. Osborne, S. Moroz, and J. C. Hal- imeh, String breaking in a 2+1dZ 2 lattice gauge theory (2025), arXiv:2501.17929 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Kogut and L

    J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Hamiltonian formulation of wilson’s lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D11, 395 (1975)

    1975

  76. [84]

    P´ erez-Garc ´ ıa, F

    D. P´ erez-Garc ´ ıa, F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product state representations, Quantum Inf. Comput.7, 401 (2007)

    2007

  77. [85]

    Paeckel, T

    S. Paeckel, T. K¨ ohler, A. Swoboda, S. R. Manmana, U. Schollw¨ ock, and C. Hubig, Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states, Annals Phys.411, 167998 (2019)

    2019

  78. [86]

    Krinitsin, N

    W. Krinitsin, N. Tausendpfund, M. Rizzi, M. Heyl, and M. Schmitt, Roughening dynamics of interfaces in two- dimensional quantum matter (2024), arXiv:2412.10145 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Fradkin and L

    E. Fradkin and L. Susskind, Order and disorder in gauge systems and magnets, Phys. Rev. D17, 2637 (1978)

    1978

  80. [88]

    J. B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.51, 659 (1979)

    1979

  81. [89]

    F. J. Wegner, Duality in generalized ising models and phase transitions without local order parameters, Jour- nal of Mathematical Physics12, 2259 (1971)

    1971

  82. [90]

    Cobanera, G

    E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov, The bond- algebraic approach to dualities, Advances in physics60, 679 (2011)

    2011

  83. [91]

    Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a con- tinuous symmetry group i

    V. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a con- tinuous symmetry group i. classical systems, Sov. Phys. JETP32, 493 (1971)

    1971

  84. [92]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics6, 1181–1203 (1973)

    1973

  85. [93]

    J. M. Kosterlitz, The critical properties of the two- dimensional xy model, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics7, 1046–1060 (1974)

    1974

  86. [94]

    Fr¨ ohlich and T

    J. Fr¨ ohlich and T. Spencer, The kosterlitz-thouless tran- sition in two-dimensional abelian spin systems and the coulomb gas, Communications in Mathematical Physics 81, 527–602 (1981)

    1981

  87. [95]

    H. W. J. Bl¨ ote and Y. Deng, Cluster monte carlo simu- lation of the transverse ising model, Physical Review E 66, 10.1103/physreve.66.066110 (2002)

    2002 doi

  88. [96]

    The saturation values will bew 2 →(2k 2 + 1)/6 ifN= 2kandw 2 →(k(k+ 1))/3 ifN= 2k+ 1

  89. [97]

    Amico, R

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, En- tanglement in many-body systems, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 517–576 (2008)

    2008

  90. [98]

    Holzhey, F

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen, and F. Wilczek, Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory, Nuclear Physics B424, 443 (1994)

    1994

  91. [99]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2004, P06002 (2004)

    2004

  92. [100]

    V. E. Korepin, Universality of entropy scaling in one di- mensional gapless models, Physical Review Letters92, 10.1103/physrevlett.92.096402 (2004)

    2004 doi

  93. [101]

    Vidal, J

    G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev, En- tanglement in quantum critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 227902 (2003)

    2003

  94. [102]

    L¨ uscher, K

    M. L¨ uscher, K. Symanzik, and P. Weisz, Anomalies of the free loop wave equation in the wkb approximation, Nuclear Physics B173, 365–396 (1980)

    1980

  95. [103]

    Kuti, Lattice qcd and string theory, International Journal of Modern Physics A21, 699–706 (2006)

    J. Kuti, Lattice qcd and string theory, International Journal of Modern Physics A21, 699–706 (2006)

    2006

  96. [104]

    Caselle, D

    M. Caselle, D. Fioravanti, F. Gliozzi, and R. Tateo, Quantisation of the effective string with tba, Journal of High Energy Physics2013, 1 (2013)

    2013

  97. [105]

    H. W. J. Bl¨ ote, J. L. Cardy, and M. P. Nightingale, Conformal invariance, the central charge, and univer- sal finite-size amplitudes at criticality, Physical Review Letters56, 742–745 (1986)

    1986

  98. [106]

    Affleck, Universal term in the free energy at a critical point and the conformal anomaly, inFinite-Size Scaling (Elsevier, 1988) p

    I. Affleck, Universal term in the free energy at a critical point and the conformal anomaly, inFinite-Size Scaling (Elsevier, 1988) p. 347–349

    1988

  99. [107]

    Francesco, P

    P. Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S´ en´ echal,Conformal field theory(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  100. [108]

    Lorentz-invariance on a lattice has to be understood as isotropy between the time and space directions

  101. [109]

    J. B. Kogut and D. K. Sinclair, Analyticity of the off- axis string tension and the restoration of rotational 21 symmetry in lattice systems, Physical Review D24, 1610–1616 (1981)

    1981

  102. [110]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems, Journal of Statisti- cal Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2005, P04010 (2005)

    2005

  103. [111]

    De Chiara, S

    G. De Chiara, S. Montangero, P. Calabrese, and F. Rosario, Entanglement entropy dynamics of heisen- berg chains, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2006, P03001 (2006)

    2006

  104. [112]

    Alba and P

    V. Alba and P. Calabrese, Entanglement and thermodynamics after a quantum quench in integrable systems, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences114, 7947 (2017), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1703516114

    2017 doi

  105. [113]

    Kim and D

    H. Kim and D. A. Huse, Ballistic spreading of entan- glement in a diffusive nonintegrable system, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 127205 (2013)

    2013

  106. [114]

    W. W. Ho and D. A. Abanin, Entanglement dynamics in quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B95, 094302 (2017)

    2017

  107. [115]

    Nahum, J

    A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. X7, 031016 (2017)

    2017

  108. [116]

    ˇZnidariˇ c, T

    M. ˇZnidariˇ c, T. c. v. Prosen, and P. Prelovˇ sek, Many- body localization in the heisenbergxxzmagnet in a random field, Phys. Rev. B77, 064426 (2008)

    2008

  109. [117]

    J. H. Bardarson, F. Pollmann, and J. E. Moore, Un- bounded growth of entanglement in models of many- body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 017202 (2012)

    2012

  110. [118]

    Fradm98, Quantum simulation package with MPS in python (2025),https://github.com/Fradm98/qs-mps [GitHub repository forqs-mps]

    2025

  111. [119]

    Nambu, Qcd and the string model, Physics Letters B80, 372–376 (1979)

    Y. Nambu, Qcd and the string model, Physics Letters B80, 372–376 (1979)

    1979

  112. [120]

    Goddard, J

    P. Goddard, J. Goldstone, C. Rebbi, and C. Thorn, Quantum dynamics of a massless relativistic string, Nu- clear Physics B56, 109–135 (1973)

    1973

  113. [121]

    Polyakov, Fine structure of strings, Nuclear Physics B268, 406–412 (1986)

    A. Polyakov, Fine structure of strings, Nuclear Physics B268, 406–412 (1986)

    1986

  114. [122]

    Polchinski and A

    J. Polchinski and A. Strominger, Effective string theory, Physical Review Letters67, 1681–1684 (1991)

    1991

  115. [123]

    Mishra, J

    T. Mishra, J. Carrasquilla, and M. Rigol, Phase diagram of the half-filled one-dimensionalt−V−V ′ model, Phys- ical Review B84, 10.1103/physrevb.84.115135 (2011)

    2011 doi

  116. [124]

    Dalmonte, J

    M. Dalmonte, J. Carrasquilla, L. Taddia, E. Erco- lessi, and M. Rigol, Gap scaling at berezinskii-kosterlitz- thouless quantum critical points in one-dimensional hubbard and heisenberg models, Physical Review B91, 10.1103/physrevb.91.165136 (2015)

    2015 doi

  117. [125]

    Woynarovich and H

    F. Woynarovich and H. P. Eckle, Finite-size corrections for the low lying states of a half-filled hubbard chain, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General20, L443–L449 (1987)

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.