Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 84 references

The Stellar Populations and Rest-Frame Colors of Star-Forming Galaxies at $z \approx 8$: Exploring the Impact of Filter Choice and Star Formation History Assumption with JADES

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Dense NIRCam coverage — eight or more filters with a medium band — recovers stellar populations and rest-frame colors for roughly 80 percent of typical $z\approx8$ star-forming galaxies without the MIRI 7.7 $\mu$m point.

desk verdict A careful z≈8 NIRCam-vs-MIRI comparison whose central 80% claim is weakened by low-S/N MIRI benchmarks; still worth refereeing if the high-S/N subset holds. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02099 v1 pith:S5IO76VU submitted 2025-06-02 astro-ph.GA

Jakob M. Helton , Stacey Alberts , George H. Rieke , Kevin N. Hainline , Zhiyuan Ji , Marcia J. Rieke , Benjamin D. Johnson , Brant Robertson
show 25 more authors
Sandro Tacchella Lily Whitler William M. Baker Rachana Bhatawdekar Kristan Boyett Andrew J. Bunker Phillip A. Cargile Stefano Carniani Stephane Charlot Jacopo Chevallard Emma Curtis-Lake Eiichi Egami Daniel J. Eisenstein Ryan Hausen Jianwei Lyu Roberto Maiolino Erica Nelson Pablo G. Pérez-González Pierluigi Rinaldi Meredith Stone Fengwu Sun Christina C. Williams Christopher N. A. Willmer Chris Willott Joris Witstok
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords high-redshiftgalaxiesstellarpopulationsspectralenergydistributionfittingJWST/NIRCamJWST/MIRIrest-framecolorsstarformationhistoryEpochofReionization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether JWST's mid-infrared channel is truly necessary to measure the stellar content of galaxies in the first billion years of cosmic time. The authors take 22 star-forming galaxies at $7 < z \leq 9$ with the deepest existing NIRCam and MIRI imaging in the JADES field and refit their spectral energy distributions with and without the MIRI/F770W point, which at these redshifts samples the rest-frame $I$-band. Dense NIRCam coverage — eight or more filters, including at least one medium band — reproduces the stellar masses, ages, star formation rates, and rest-frame colors obtained with MIRI for roughly 80 percent of the sample, with median offsets consistent with zero. The result matters because MIRI observes slowly over a small field of view; if the claim holds, large surveys of the Epoch of Reionization can characterize typical galaxies with NIRCam alone and reserve MIRI time for the anomalous minority.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing comparison is between SED fits that include and exclude the MIRI/F770W photometric point, made informative by the fact that at $z\approx8$ the $7.7\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ filter lands on the rest-frame $I$-band. The fitting machinery is Bayesian spectral energy distribution modeling with flexible stellar population synthesis, MIST stellar tracks, a Chabrier initial mass function, two-component Charlot & Fall dust attenuation, and self-consistent photoionization nebular emission, run across four star formation history priors — constant, delayed-tau, non-parametric continuity, and bursty — and four filter sets that mirror real surveys: JOF (16 filters), JADES (11), CEERS (10), and COSMOS-Web (6). The delayed-tau prior does specific work in the argument: it allows a rising, cosmologically motivated star formation history with only two free parameters, and the paper finds it produces the smallest offsets and scatter when MIRI is added, making it the recommended assumption for photometric studies of these galaxies.

What would settle it

Repeat the with-and-without-MIRI comparison on a sample whose F770W detections sit at signal-to-noise above 5, or on simulated galaxies with known input stellar populations, and check whether the offsets between NIRCam-only and NIRCam-plus-MIRI fits for stellar mass and age stay within a few tenths of a dex; the compensation claim fails if systematic offsets appear at high signal-to-noise. A second test is to rerun the same filter sets on shallower NIRCam photometry, because the paper varies only filter choice and never simulates survey depth.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that filter choice, not the presence of a $7.7\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ data point, controls whether the stellar populations of typical star-forming galaxies at $z\approx8$ are reliably recovered. For galaxies near rest-UV absolute magnitude $M_{\mathrm{UV}}\approx-20$ and continuum slope $\beta\approx-2$, Bayesian SED fits using the JOF, JADES, or CEERS filter sets — 10 to 16 NIRCam filters, each including at least one medium band — yield stellar masses, mass-weighted ages, star formation rates, rest-optical equivalent widths, and rest-frame colors that barely move when MIRI/F770W is dropped, with median offsets within about 0.05 dex and 68% scatter of roughly 0.1–0.4 dex. The sparse COSMOS-Web set (six filters) fails this test: including MIRI shifts galaxies toward lower mass (median $-0.37$ dex), younger age ($-0.40$ dex), and bluer rest-optical colors. Roughly 20 percent of the sample (four galaxies) is genuinely MIRI-dependent, splitting into two anomalously red sources — plausibly older populations, dust, or active galactic nuclei — and two anomalously blue sources whose observed 7.7 $\mu$m flux falls below the NIRCam-only prediction; these are presented as the cases where mid-infrared data are indispensable.

Load-bearing premise

The benchmark 'with MIRI' answers come from F770W measurements required only to exceed a signal-to-noise ratio of 1.5, so for the faintest galaxies the MIRI point is nearly uninformative and finding that it changes little is partly guaranteed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Typical star-forming galaxies at $z\approx8$ — $M_{\mathrm{UV}}\approx-20$ and $\beta\approx-2$ — can have their stellar masses, ages, star formation rates, and rest-frame colors measured from NIRCam alone, provided the survey uses eight or more filters including at least one medium band.
  • With sparse NIRCam coverage (six filters, as in COSMOS-Web), omitting the 7.7 $\mu$m point biases fits toward lower mass, younger age, and bluer rest-optical and near-infrared colors.
  • Roughly one in five galaxies at these redshifts is MIRI-dependent — two anomalously red and two anomalously blue in this sample — so mid-infrared imaging remains necessary to find and characterize the outliers.
  • The delayed-tau star formation history is the recommended prior for photometric SED fitting of high-redshift star-forming galaxies, giving the most consistent results when the MIRI point is added.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper varies filter choice but not survey depth, so the NIRCam-only recipe is demonstrated only at JADES-like depth; a shallower eight-filter survey may still need MIRI, and testing that is the natural next step.
  • Because the 'with MIRI' benchmark admits detections at S/N > 1.5, the four anomalous galaxies may be only the visible tip: a sample restricted to F770W detections at S/N > 5 could reveal more sources whose properties NIRCam alone gets wrong.
  • The two anomalously red galaxies suggest that a NIRCam-only survey at $z\approx8$ could miss or misclassify dusty or AGN-bearing systems, so counting such objects may require the very MIRI imaging the paper argues can be spared for typical galaxies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes a sample of 22 star-forming galaxies at 7 < z_phot ≤ 9 in the JADES GOODS-S field with JWST/NIRCam and MIRI/F770W imaging. The authors fit stellar population parameters and rest-frame colors with Prospector using four filter sets (COSMOS-Web, CEERS, JADES, JOF) and four star formation history assumptions (constant, delayed-tau, continuity, bursty continuity). The central analysis compares results obtained with and without the MIRI/F770W photometric point, and the paper concludes that dense NIRCam coverage (eight or more filters including at least one medium band) can compensate for the missing rest-frame I-band for roughly 80% of the sample, while the delayed-tau SFH gives the most consistent results when MIRI is included.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper has practical value for survey design at z ≈ 8: it would imply that deep NIRCam medium-band imaging can substitute for expensive MIRI observations for typical star-forming galaxies. The analysis is careful in several respects: photometry is measured in a consistent forced-aperture framework, a wide grid of filter sets and SFH assumptions is explored, and the authors are transparent about the depth limitation in Section 5. The with/without MIRI comparison is a legitimate empirical test rather than a circular derivation. However, the benchmark MIRI measurements are weak for a substantial fraction of the sample, and the absence of depth simulations means the generalization to shallower surveys such as CEERS is not yet supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1, Figure 7, Table 3] The central claim that dense NIRCam coverage compensates for missing rest-frame I-band coverage rests on the comparison between fits with and without MIRI/F770W. Section 3.1 defines a detection as S/N > 1.5 and reports that only 14 of 22 sources have S/N > 3. At S/N = 1.5 the F770W flux uncertainty is roughly 67%, and even at S/N = 3 it is about 33%. A photometric point this weak has little leverage on a Prospector posterior, so the fact that 18 of 22 fits are 'unaffected' by its inclusion is partly expected regardless of NIRCam filter coverage. The 80% figure is therefore inflated by exactly the sources for which the MIRI benchmark is least informative. The authors should demonstrate that the conclusion holds for the S/N > 3 subsample, or perform injection/recovery tests in which synthetic F770W fluxes of varying S/N are added to the fits and the parameter shifts are measured.
  2. [Section 5, first paragraph; Abstract; Section 6] The paper explicitly states that 'we do not simulate or explore the impact of differences in observational depth' and that only the adopted filter set is changed while using the same photometric measurements. Nevertheless, the Abstract and Section 6 generalize the conclusion to 'extragalactic surveys like JADES and CEERS.' CEERS has different NIRCam depths than the ultra-deep JADES data used here, and the CEERS filter set in Table 2 is also different in detail. Because the analysis does not vary depth, the claim that NIRCam alone is sufficient for robust characterization in shallower surveys is not established by the data. Depth simulations, or at least a re-analysis restricted to the depth actually available in CEERS-like observations, are needed before this generalization can be supported.
  3. [Section 5.3, Tables 3 and 4] The recommendation that the parametric delayed-tau SFH is 'most consistent' is based on it providing the smallest offsets and scatters around those offsets when including MIRI/F770W. This is a consistency criterion relative to a benchmark that is itself the same Prospector model with one low-weight photometric point added. Given the weak S/N of many F770W measurements, a model that is simply insensitive to the extra point will trivially score well on this criterion. The paper's stronger statement that delayed-tau SFH is 'physically motivated' and 'provides key insights into the physics governing early galaxy formation' therefore goes beyond what the comparison demonstrates. The authors should reframe this as a statement about internal consistency, or validate the delayed-tau preference against a higher-S/N benchmark or against spectroscopic constraints.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Table 2] The CEERS filter set is listed as containing 10 filters, but the row shows only 9 checkmarks and omits F090W, which is part of the actual CEERS NIRCam filter complement. Please reconcile the header count with the entries in the table.
  2. [Figure 6 caption] The caption states that the atypical-galaxy result is true for a 'small fraction (≈10%)' of the sample, whereas the text in Section 4.3 and Section 5.1 states N = 4 galaxies, which is ≈18%, rounded to ≈20%. The caption should be corrected to match the text.
  3. [Title and Table 2 header] The title contains 'Rest-F rame' with a stray space, and the table header similarly shows 'F rame' in places. These are typographical artifacts that should be cleaned up.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the with/without-MIRI comparison is an empirical leave-one-out sensitivity test, not a derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is tested by refitting the same Prospector model to observed photometry with and without the MIRI/F770W point; the 'without-MIRI' fit is an out-of-sample prediction of the F770W flux, and the 'with-MIRI' fit serves as a comparison benchmark rather than as a fitted input renamed as a prediction. No parameter is fitted to the target quantity and then reported as an independent result. The sample selection, photometric catalogs, and MIRI measurements come from JADES/team data releases (Rieke et al. 2023; Alberts et al. 2024b), but these are reproducible external data products, and the central inference does not rest on a load-bearing self-citation. The delayed-tau SFH preference is a transparent ranking by the stated metric (smallest with/without-MIRI offsets) rather than a hidden ansatz or an imported uniqueness claim. Two caveats, both empirical rather than circular: Section 3.1 adopts S/N>1.5 for MIRI detections and notes that only 14/22 sources have S/N>3, so the benchmark is weak for roughly one-third of the sample; and Section 5 explicitly states that observational depth is not varied. These limit the generalizability of the 'NIRCam compensates for MIRI' conclusion but do not make the with/without comparison equivalent to its inputs by construction. The identification of 'typical' galaxies from the 80% unaffected subset has a mildly self-referential flavor, but the paper independently anchors 'typical' to rest-UV properties (M_UV ≈ −20, β_UV ≈ −2), so it remains an interpretive generalization rather than a definitional circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed stellar population synthesis models, dust attenuation laws, nebular emission treatment, and SFH priors. All are standard in the field, but none are independently validated in this paper. The recommendation of delayed-tau SFH is based on internal consistency of the fits, not on external ground truth.

free parameters (3)
  • Stellar mass (log10 M*/Msun) = 8.2-9.7 per galaxy
    Central derived quantity in Prospector fits; compared with and without MIRI to assess filter-set impact.
  • Delayed-tau e-folding time τ = 0.001-30 Gyr prior, fitted per galaxy
    Used in the recommended DtSFH model; the fitted τ influences the SFH shape and thus the internal-consistency conclusion.
  • Dust optical depths τ_dust,1 and τ_dust,2 = 0-2 and 0-4 prior, fitted per galaxy
    Charlot & Fall two-component dust model; these parameters affect rest-frame optical colors and are fitted per galaxy.
assumptions (9)
  • domain assumption Chabrier (2003) IMF with mass range 0.08-120 Msun
    Adopted in Section 4.2 for all stellar population fits.
  • domain assumption MIST stellar evolution tracks including rotation
    Used with FSPS in Section 4.2 to model stellar populations.
  • domain assumption FSPS stellar population synthesis code
    The SED fitting engine, as stated in Section 4.2.
  • domain assumption Charlot & Fall (2000) two-component dust attenuation
    Adopted in Section 4.2 to model diffuse and birth-cloud dust.
  • domain assumption Calzetti et al. (2000) dust attenuation curve with power-law modifier
    Used in Section 4.2 for the shape of the diffuse dust curve.
  • domain assumption Madau (1995) IGM absorption with free f_IGM scaling
    Adopted in Section 4.2 to account for intergalactic absorption.
  • domain assumption Byler et al. (2017) Cloudy nebular emission with free Z_gas and ionization parameter
    Used to self-consistently model emission lines and continuum in Section 4.2.
  • domain assumption Four adopted SFH priors (constant, delayed-tau, continuity, bursty continuity)
    Defined in Section 4.2; the comparison of these priors is central to the SFH-recommendation conclusion.
  • domain assumption Sample selection criteria: 7<z_phot<=9, P(z>7)>=0.99, mF277W<29.0
    Defined in Section 3.1; the sample frame limits the generality of the conclusions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Stellar Populations and Rest-Frame Colors of Star-Forming Galaxies at $z \approx 8$: Exploring the Impact of Filter Choice and Star Formation History Assumption with JADES." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S5IO76VU

@misc{pith2026250602099,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Stellar Populations and Rest-Frame Colors of Star-Forming Galaxies at $z \approx 8$: Exploring the Impact of Filter Choice and Star Formation History Assumption with JADES},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S5IO76VU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02099}
}
abstract

Our understanding of the physical properties of star-forming galaxies during the Epoch of Reionization (EoR, at $z > 6$) suffers from degeneracies among the apparent properties of the stars, the nebular gas, and the dust. These degeneracies are most prominent with photometry, which has insufficient (1) spectral resolution and (2) rest-frame spectral coverage. We explore ways to break these degeneracies with a sample of $N = 22$ high-redshift star-forming galaxies at $7 < z_{\mathrm{phot}} \leq 9$, using some of the deepest existing imaging from JWST/NIRCam and JWST/MIRI with JADES. Key to this study is the imaging from JWST/MIRI at $7.7\ \mu\mathrm{m}$, which provides coverage of the rest-frame $I$-band at the observed redshifts. We infer stellar population properties and rest-frame colors using a variety of filter sets and star formation history assumptions to explore the impact of these choices. Evaluating these quantities both with and without the $7.7\ \mu\mathrm{m}$ data point shows that dense spectral coverage with JWST/NIRCam (eight or more filters, including at least one medium-band) can compensate for lacking the rest-frame $I$-band coverage for the vast majority ($\approx 80\%$) of our sample. Furthermore, these galaxy properties are most consistently determined by assuming the delayed-tau star formation history, which provides the smallest offsets and scatters around these offsets when including JWST/MIRI. Within extragalactic surveys like JADES and CEERS, our findings suggest that robust characterization of the stellar population properties and rest-frame colors for high-redshift star-forming galaxies is possible with JWST/NIRCam alone at $z \approx 8$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02099 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Histograms showing the distribution of apparent magnitudes in F277W for galaxies at 7 < zphot ≤ 9 within the ultra-deep JADES MIRI/F770W parallel region in GOODS-S, assuming the fiducial photometry described in Section 2. The grey shaded regions represent galaxies from the initial photometric sample while the blue (pink) shaded regions represent galaxies from the final photometric sample of MIRI/F770W detections (no… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Observed color in NIRCam/F410M with respect to NIRCam/F444W as a function of photometric redshift for the final photometric sample described in Section 3.1. The blue (pink) points represent galaxies with MIRI/F770W detections (non-detections). The rest-optical nebular emis￾sion lines Hβ and [OIII]λλ4960, 5008 produce excess flux in F410M relative to F444W at z ≲ 7.6 (F444W relative to F410M at z ≳ 7.6). The vast maj… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Rest-UV continuum slope versus absolute mag￾nitude for the final photometric sample described in Sec￾tion 3.1. The blue (pink) points represent galaxies with MIRI/F770W detections (non-detections). We should note that the adopted apparent magnitude cut (mF277W < 29.0) is effectively a rest-UV absolute magnitude cut at fixed rest￾UV continuum slope for these redshifts. Therefore, the UV￾faintest sources are also the … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top panel: Example of an SED for a typical galaxy (JADES−GS−ID−165595, or JADES−GS+53.05830−27.88486, at zspec = 8.585) from the final photometric sample of MIRI/F770W detections described in Section 3.1. The grey points represent the observed photometry assuming the J…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of derived stellar population properties for galaxies from the final photometric sample of MIRI/F770W detections described in Section 3.1. Values are reported as the difference between derived properties when including (Xwith MIRI) and excluding (Xwithout MI…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    C., Helton, J

    Alberts, S., Williams, C. C., Helton, J. M., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 975, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cc

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cc

  2. [2]

    2024b, ApJ, 976, 224, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7396 Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S

    Alberts, S., Lyu, J., Shivaei, I., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 976, 224, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7396 Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2023, Nature, 622, 707, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06521-7 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Pric...

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7396 2023

  3. [3]

    B., Finkelstein, S

    Bagley, M. B., Finkelstein, S. L., Rojas-Ruiz, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 209, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09dc

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad09dc 2024

  4. [4]

    Beckwith, S. V. W., Stiavelli, M., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1729, doi: 10.1086/507302

    doi:10.1086/507302 2006

  5. [5]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Franx, M., & Ford, H. 2008, ApJ, 686, 230, doi: 10.1086/590103

    doi:10.1086/590103 2008

  6. [6]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2010, ApJL, 709, L133, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/709/2/L133 —. 2015, ApJ, 803, 34, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/34

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/709/2/l133 2010

  7. [7]

    J., Oesch, P

    Bouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., Stefanon, M., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abf83e

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abf83e 2021

  8. [8]

    J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al

    Boyett, K., Bunker, A. J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 1796, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2430

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2430 2024

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    2022, astropy/photutils: 1.5.0, 1.5.0, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6825092

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2022, astropy/photutils: 1.5.0, 1.5.0, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6825092

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    B., van Dokkum, P

    Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., & Coppi, P. 2008, ApJ, 686, 1503, doi: 10.1086/591786

    2008 doi

  3. [11]

    J., Wilkins, S., Ellis, R

    Bunker, A. J., Wilkins, S., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 409, 855, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17350.x

    2010

  4. [12]

    J., Conroy, C., & Johnson, B

    Byler, N., Dalcanton, J. J., Conroy, C., & Johnson, B. D. 2017, ApJ, 840, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c66

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  6. [14]

    L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T

    Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582, doi: 10.1086/174346

    1994 doi

  7. [15]

    M., Kartaltepe, J

    Casey, C. M., Kartaltepe, J. S., Drakos, N. E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  9. [17]

    Charlot, S., & Fall, S. M. 2000, ApJ, 539, 718, doi: 10.1086/309250

    2000 doi

  10. [18]

    2016, ApJ, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    Conroy, C., & Gunn, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 712, 833, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833

    2010 doi

  12. [20]

    E., & White, M

    Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 486, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486 D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., Carniani, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A152, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348636 D’Eugenio, F., Cameron, A. J., Scholtz, J., et al. 2025, ApJS, 277, 4, doi: 10.38...

    2009 doi

  13. [21]

    2016, ApJS, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    Dotter, A. 2016, ApJS, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    J., Mortlock, A., et al

    Duncan, K., Conselice, C. J., Mortlock, A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 2960, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1622

    2014 doi

  15. [23]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2023a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.02465, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.02465

    doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    J., Johnson, B

    Eisenstein, D. J., Johnson, B. D., Robertson, B., et al. 2023b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.12340, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.12340

    doi

  17. [25]

    P., Whitler, L., et al

    Endsley, R., Stark, D. P., Whitler, L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 2312, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1919 —. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1111, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1857

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    J., Porter, R

    Ferland, G. J., Porter, R. L., van Hoof, P. A. M., et al. 2013, RMxAA, 49, 137, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1302.4485

    2013 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    L., Bagley, M., Song, M., et al

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M., Song, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3aed

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2023, ApJL, 946, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acade4

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    2016, The Journal of Open Source Software, 1, 24, doi: 10.21105/joss.00024

    Foreman-Mackey, D. 2016, The Journal of Open Source Software, 1, 24, doi: 10.21105/joss.00024

    2016 doi

  22. [30]

    2014, python-fsps: Python bindings to FSPS (v0.1.1), v0.1.1,

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Sick, J., & Johnson, B. 2014, python-fsps: Python bindings to FSPS (v0.1.1), v0.1.1,

    2014

  23. [31]

    Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12157

    doi

  24. [32]

    R., et al

    Fujimoto, S., Wang, B., Weaver, J. R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 250, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9027 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    C., Koekemoer, A

    Giavalisco, M., Ferguson, H. C., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2004, ApJL, 600, L93, doi: 10.1086/379232

    2004 doi

  26. [34]

    M., Brasseur, C

    Ginsburg, A., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., Brasseur, C. E., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    2012, A&A, 547, A51, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219669

    Grazian, A., Castellano, M., Fontana, A., et al. 2012, A&A, 547, A51, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219669

    2012 doi

  28. [36]

    2015, A&A, 575, A96, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424750

    Grazian, A., Fontana, A., Santini, P., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A96, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424750

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    N., Johnson, B

    Hainline, K. N., Johnson, B. D., Robertson, B., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1ee4

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  31. [39]

    M., Sun, F., Woodrum, C., et al

    Helton, J. M., Sun, F., Woodrum, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6867

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    M., Rieke, G

    Helton, J. M., Rieke, G. H., Alberts, S., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02503-z 24Helton et al

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  34. [42]

    I., Rinaldi, P., et al

    Iani, E., Caputi, K. I., Rinaldi, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad15f6

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1606.00841, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1606.00841

    Illingworth, G., Magee, D., Bouwens, R., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1606.00841, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1606.00841

    2016 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    C., Tacchella, S., et al

    Ji, Z., Williams, C. C., Tacchella, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6e7f

    2024 doi

  37. [45]

    D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J

    Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2021, ApJS, 254, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abef67

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    2013, ApJL, 775, L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16

    Kriek, M., & Conroy, C. 2013, ApJL, 775, L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16

    2013 doi

  39. [47]

    E., Hook, R

    Krist, J. E., Hook, R. N., & Stoehr, F. 2011, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8127, Optical Modeling and Performance Predictions V, ed. M. A. Kahan, 81270J, doi: 10.1117/12.892762 Labb´ e, I., Huang, J., Franx, M., et al. 20...

    2011 doi

  40. [48]

    1995, ApJ, 441, 18, doi: 10.1086/175332

    Madau, P. 1995, ApJ, 441, 18, doi: 10.1086/175332

    1995 doi

  41. [49]

    J., Dunlop, J

    McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., Cirasuolo, M., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 403, 960, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16176.x

    2010

  42. [50]

    J., Dunlop, J

    McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., Bowler, R. A. A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 2696, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt627

    2013 doi

  43. [51]

    2024, ApJ, 961, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0966

    Narayanan, D., Lower, S., Torrey, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0966

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    I., et al

    Navarro-Carrera, R., Rinaldi, P., Caputi, K. I., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 207, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0df6

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    A., Bouwens, R

    Oesch, P. A., Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., et al. 2010, ApJL, 709, L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/709/1/L16 —. 2012, ApJ, 759, 135, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/135 —. 2014, ApJ, 786, 108, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/108

    2010 doi

  46. [54]

    A., Brammer, G., Naidu, R

    Oesch, P. A., Brammer, G., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 2864, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2411

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    B., & Gunn, J

    Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713, doi: 10.1086/160817

    1983 doi

  48. [56]

    W., Yang, G., et al

    Papovich, C., Cole, J. W., Yang, G., et al. 2023, ApJL, 949, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc948

    2023 doi

  49. [57]

    2011, ApJS, 192, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    2011 doi

  50. [58]

    2013, ApJS, 208, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    2013 doi

  51. [59]

    2015, ApJS, 220, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 220, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    2015 doi

  52. [60]

    B., et al

    Paxton, B., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8

    2018 doi

  53. [61]

    D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al

    Perrin, M. D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9143, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. J. Oschmann, Jacobus M., M. Clampi...

    2014 doi

  54. [62]

    2023, MNRAS, 519, 1526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3214

    Popesso, P., Concas, A., Cresci, G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 1526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3214

    2023 doi

  55. [63]

    2007, AJ, 134, 1103, doi: 10.1086/520330

    Quadri, R., Marchesini, D., van Dokkum, P., et al. 2007, AJ, 134, 1103, doi: 10.1086/520330

    2007 doi

  56. [64]

    J., Robertson, B., Tacchella, S., et al

    Rieke, M. J., Robertson, B., Tacchella, S., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acf44d

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    G., Rieke, G

    Rinaldi, P., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.01852, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.01852

    2025 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    D., Tacchella, S., et al

    Robertson, B., Johnson, B. D., Tacchella, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad463d

    2024 doi

  59. [67]

    2009, A&A, 502, 423, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911781

    Schaerer, D., & de Barros, S. 2009, A&A, 502, 423, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911781

    2009 doi

  60. [68]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 6139, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3605

    Simmonds, C., Tacchella, S., Hainline, K., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 6139, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3605

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    J., Labb´ e, I., et al

    Smit, R., Bouwens, R. J., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 58, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/58

    2014 doi

  62. [70]

    Speagle, J. S. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3132, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa278

    2020 doi

  63. [71]

    P., Schenker, M

    Stark, D. P., Schenker, M. A., Ellis, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 763, 129, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/129

    2013 doi

  64. [72]

    Johnson, B. D. 2018, ApJ, 868, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e0

    2018 doi

  65. [73]

    L., Bagley, M., et al

    Tacchella, S., Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4cad

    2022 doi

  66. [74]

    D., Robertson, B

    Tacchella, S., Johnson, B. D., Robertson, B. E., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 6236, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1408 The Pandas Development Team. 2022, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, v1.5.0, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7093122

    2023 doi

  67. [75]

    W., Stark, D

    Topping, M. W., Stark, D. P., Endsley, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 4087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae800 van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science and Engineering, 13, 22, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37

    2024 doi

  68. [76]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  69. [77]

    2024a, ApJ, 963, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad187c The Stellar Populations and Rest-Frame Colors of Star-Forming Galaxies atz≈8 25

    Wang, B., Leja, J., Atek, H., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 963, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad187c The Stellar Populations and Rest-Frame Colors of Star-Forming Galaxies atz≈8 25

    doi

  70. [78]

    2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.02399, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.02399

    Wang, T., Sun, H., Zhou, L., et al. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.02399, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.02399

    doi arXiv

  71. [79]

    2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3021, doi: 10.21105/joss.03021

    Waskom, M. 2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3021, doi: 10.21105/joss.03021

    2021 doi

  72. [80]

    E., Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P

    Whitaker, K. E., Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/86

    2011 doi

  73. [81]

    E., Ashas, M., Illingworth, G., et al

    Whitaker, K. E., Ashas, M., Illingworth, G., et al. 2019, ApJS, 244, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab3853

    2019 doi

  74. [82]

    C., Alberts, S., Ji, Z., et al

    Williams, C. C., Alberts, S., Ji, Z., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3f17

    2024 doi

  75. [83]

    2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 121, e2317375121, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2317375121

    Woodrum, C., Rieke, M., Ji, Z., et al. 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 121, e2317375121, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2317375121

    2024 doi

  76. [84]

    continuity

    Yan, H., Finkelstein, S. L., Huang, K.-H., et al. 2012, ApJ, 761, 177, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/177 26Helton et al. APPENDIX A.PHYSICAL PROPERTIES FOR THE FINAL PHOTOMETRIC SAMPLE OF MIRI/F770W NON-DETECTIONS Table A1 provides a summary of physical quantities for the final...

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.