Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

AnimeShooter: A Multi-Shot Animation Dataset for Reference-Guided Video Generation

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read AnimeShooter is the first reference-guided multi-shot animation dataset, with hierarchical story and shot annotations, and a baseline model that improves cross-shot character and style consistency.

desk verdict A genuinely useful dataset contribution, but the paper has not yet shown the annotations are accurate enough to support its central claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03126 v1 pith:Y2KRDPMU submitted 2025-06-03 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords reference-guidedvideogenerationmulti-shotanimationdatasethierarchicalstoryannotationcharacterreferenceimagecross-shotconsistencyautoregressivemultimodallargelanguagemodeldiffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

AnimeShooter is a dataset built to close a gap the paper identifies: existing video datasets describe single real-world clips, while animated storytelling needs consecutive shots that share characters, style, and narrative. The central claim is that AnimeShooter is the first reference-guided multi-shot animation dataset, pairing each story with hierarchical annotations—an overall storyline, main scenes, character profiles with reference images, and per-shot scene, character, narrative, and descriptive captions—plus an audio-synchronized subset. To show the dataset works, the authors train AnimeShooterGen, an autoregressive model that conditions each new shot on the reference image and the previously generated shots. On a 200-story benchmark with 800 shots, it outperforms per-shot generation and keyframe-to-video baselines on character-reference consistency, style consistency, and contextual consistency. If the dataset is sound, it gives the research community a standard resource for coherent, reference-guided animated video generation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a hierarchical story-script annotation pipeline plus an autoregressive reference-and-context conditioning loop. The captioning prompt instructs a multimodal language model to produce a storyline, main scenes, and character profiles, then decompose each segment into consecutive shots, each with scene, character list, narrative caption, and descriptive caption; reference images come from sampling frames, text-prompted character segmentation, and quality filtering. In the model, a pretrained multimodal large language model takes the reference image, the current shot caption, and the accumulated context (last frame plus caption of every earlier shot) and emits a conditioning signal; a learnable adapter called a Q-Former connects this signal to a pretrained video diffusion model that generates the shot. Because each generated shot's last frame is appended to the context, visual identity and style are carried forward shot to shot.

What would settle it

Take a random sample of AnimeShooter shots and have independent human annotators check whether each reference image matches the named character and whether the shot captions match the visual content; if a large fraction fails, the automated annotations cannot be trusted as training signal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes two things. First, a fully automated curation pipeline can turn publicly available anime videos into a large hierarchical dataset: a multimodal language model decomposes each one-minute story segment into shots and writes story-level and shot-level annotations, a segmentation model extracts character reference images, and a quality model filters bad frames and masks. Second, a generative model trained on those annotations can propagate a character reference and narrative context across shots: the multimodal language model reads the reference image, prior captions, and the last frames of earlier shots, produces a conditioning signal, and the diffusion model decodes the next shot, with the new shot's last frame feeding the next step. The reported experiments support the claim that this autoregressive reference-guided design yields stronger cross-shot appearance, style, and contextual consistency than generating each shot independently.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the automated pipeline—the language model's hierarchical scripts, the segmentation model's character masks, and the quality filter's verdicts—is accurate enough to provide reliable training signal, since only a small human-verified subset is reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A model trained on AnimeShooter can generate a multi-shot story in which the character's appearance and the artistic style follow a provided reference image.
  • Autoregressive conditioning on previously generated shots yields stronger cross-shot style and contextual consistency than generating each shot independently.
  • Sequences trained at three shots generalize to longer four-shot narratives at test time, suggesting the conditioning mechanism scales to longer stories.
  • AnimeShooter and AnimeShooter-audio supply 148K story-level samples, 2.2M shot-level annotations, and synchronized audio descriptions, giving the community a benchmark for reference-guided multi-shot animation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the annotation pipeline generalizes beyond anime, the same scripted-decomposition approach could build reference-guided datasets for storyboarded live-action or comic-style video, a direction the paper does not pursue.
  • The autoregressive design implies that errors in early shots propagate into later ones; a stress test on ten-to-twenty-shot stories would reveal how quickly consistency drifts.
  • Because the paper reports only a small human verification subset, an independent human audit of annotation accuracy would separate the contribution of data quality from that of the model architecture.
  • AnimeShooter-audio is presented as a resource rather than used in training; training a joint audio-visual model on it would directly test whether the subset's annotations improve synchronization, which the paper's naive text-to-audio pipeline does not achieve.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces AnimeShooter, a large-scale reference-guided multi-shot animation dataset, and AnimeShooterGen, a baseline model for reference-guided multi-shot video generation. The dataset is constructed by collecting animation videos from YouTube, splitting them into story units, using Gemini-2.0-flash to generate hierarchical story- and shot-level annotations, and using Sa2VA with InternVL filtering to produce character reference images. A smaller audio-annotated subset, AnimeShooter-audio, is also described. AnimeShooterGen combines an MLLM backbone with a video diffusion model, conditioning each generated shot on a reference image and previously generated shots, and is trained in several stages including a per-IP LoRA enhancement step. The authors report automatic metrics, MLLM-based evaluations, and a small user study, and conclude that the model trained on AnimeShooter achieves superior cross-shot visual consistency and reference adherence.

Significance. If the dataset is released with high-quality annotations and reference images, it would fill a real gap: existing video datasets are predominantly real-world, single-shot, and lack explicit reference images for character consistency. The paper provides a detailed description of the automated annotation pipeline, including the full prompts used for Gemini, Sa2VA, and InternVL, which is a useful practical contribution. The proposed AnimeShooterGen baseline is clearly specified and could serve as a starting point for the task. However, the central contribution is a dataset, and the manuscript does not currently provide quantitative validation of the annotation pipeline's accuracy, nor a controlled evaluation that isolates the dataset's contribution from the architecture, the per-IP fine-tuning, and the author-constructed test set. The dataset and code are not yet accessible for verification, so the reproducibility of the central claims is limited.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.4 (with Sections 3.2–3.3)] The paper reports only that 'human verification checkpoints on a small subset' were used, without sample size, per-stage accuracy, error taxonomy, or inter-annotator agreement. Because the dataset is the main contribution, the reliability of the Gemini story/shot decomposition, the Sa2VA segmentations, and the InternVL filtering is load-bearing; without quantitative validation of character-ID consistency, shot-boundary accuracy, and reference-image identity fidelity, the claim that AnimeShooter provides a reliable training signal is not yet established.
  2. [Section 5.1, Section C.2, Tables 2–3] The evaluation does not isolate the contribution of AnimeShooter. Both AnimeShooterGen and CogVideo-LoRA receive per-IP LoRA fine-tuning on the same 5–6 manually curated clips, and the test prompts are generated per IP from those same IPs; it is therefore unclear whether the reported gains come from the dataset's annotations or from the combination of autoregressive architecture, MLLM conditioning, and per-IP test-time fine-tuning. An ablation that removes the AnimeShooter training signal (e.g., training only on WebVid-style captions or on single-shot data) or an evaluation on held-out IPs without LoRA enhancement is needed to support the central claim.
  3. [Section 5.2, Tables 2–3, Section C.5] No statistical significance or confidence intervals are reported for any of the comparisons. The user study uses only 10 participants and 15 stories, and the MLLM-judge scores are averages over three presentation orders without a reliability or calibration analysis; the differences in Table 3 (e.g., OQ 7.19 vs. 6.96 vs. 6.76 for GPT-4o) are small and may not be meaningful. Quantitative significance testing or effect-size reporting is required before claiming 'superior cross-shot visual consistency.'
  4. [Section 6 and Section D] The paper's own limitation statements—test-time fine-tuning required for character consistency, no open-domain generation due to computational demands, and suboptimal audio-visual synchronization—are consistent with my reading and should be reflected in the evaluation claims. In particular, the qualitative and quantitative comparisons all use LoRA enhancement on the evaluation IPs, so the results do not demonstrate that the dataset alone enables the claimed consistency.
  5. [Section F] The manuscript states that the dataset, code, and model weights will be released, but no data, code, or evaluation split is currently available for inspection. Since the main contribution is the dataset and the automated pipeline is the only evidence of annotation quality, the absence of any downloadable sample or exact evaluation prompts prevents verification of the statistics in Table 1 and the annotation examples.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3] The first paragraph contains the typo 'construciton' and should read 'construction.'
  2. [Table 2 and Section C.3] The HarMeanP column is not marked with a direction arrow, even though the underlying DreamSim is a distance where lower is better; the text calls it 'Penalized Harmonic Mean Similarity,' which is confusing when applied to a distance metric. Please clarify whether lower or higher is better for this column.
  3. [Section 5.1 and Section C.2] The evaluation set consists of only 20 IPs with 5–6 manually curated clips per IP, and the 200 test stories are generated by a single LLM (DeepSeek) without manual verification or release of the prompts; this limits the diversity and external validity of the benchmark, and the prompts should be released for reproducibility.
  4. [Section 3.3 and Section A.2] The mask post-processing thresholds (over 15 contours, 5 disconnected components, 5%–90% area) are presented without justification or sensitivity analysis; please report how these choices affect the number of accepted reference images.
  5. [Section B.2] The training details state that Condition Alignment uses WebVid-10M and Single-Shot Training uses AnimeShooter, but the exact number of AnimeShooter samples used in each stage and the sampling strategy for the 3-shot sequences are not reported; please clarify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central claims are empirical and evaluated with externally defined metrics, and its self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

AnimeShooter is a dataset contribution whose central claim is that a model trained on it achieves superior cross-shot visual consistency and reference adherence. There is no derivation chain in which an output quantity is defined in terms of an input quantity, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The reference images and hierarchical annotations are produced by an automated pipeline and then used as training signal; the evaluation compares models on a custom 20-IP test set using CLIP, DreamSim, GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and user studies. These metrics are defined independently of the dataset's own annotations, and the baselines are finetuned under matched conditions, including the same per-IP LoRA enhancement procedure. The self-citations to AnimeGamer and Seed-Story support evaluation conventions only and do not carry the central claim. The lack of quantitative validation of the automated annotation pipeline is a correctness or evidence concern, not circularity, and the per-IP finetuning is disclosed as a limitation rather than hidden. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the reliability of an automated annotation pipeline. The paper provides no quantitative validation of the Gemini-generated scripts, Sa2VA masks, or InternVL quality checks beyond a small human verification subset. The evaluation protocol adds further assumptions about MLLM judges and the representativeness of the 20-IP test set. No free parameters are fitted to data in a derivation sense, but several pipeline thresholds and training hyperparameters are chosen by hand without ablation.

free parameters (6)
  • Maximum video duration filter = 20 minutes.
    Videos longer than 20 minutes are removed to keep character appearances consistent; this threshold is chosen by hand and is not ablated.
  • Segment duration target = Approximately 1 minute per story segment.
    Each YouTube video is cut into roughly one-minute segments treated as self-contained stories; this choice defines the dataset's story unit without validation.
  • Reference mask area thresholds = 5% to 90% of image area.
    Segmentation masks outside this size range are discarded; the bounds are set manually and affect reference image coverage and quality.
  • Mask post-processing thresholds = Reject masks with more than 15 contours or 5 disconnected components.
    These thresholds in Section A.2 control which Sa2VA masks pass; they are chosen without an ablation study.
  • CFG dropout probability = 0.05 for reference, caption, or both.
    Used in single-shot and multi-shot training to condition the model; the specific value is a hyperparameter and is not optimized or ablated.
  • MLLM evaluation averaging rounds = 3 rounds with changed presentation order.
    Scores from GPT-4o and Gemini 2.5 Pro are averaged over three rounds; this protocol choice reduces order bias but is a design decision.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Gemini-2.0-flash generates accurate hierarchical story scripts, shot decompositions, and captions from 1-minute video segments.
    Section 3.2 relies on Gemini for all narrative annotations; accuracy is checked only on a small human-verified subset and no agreement metrics are reported.
  • domain assumption Sa2VA text-prompted segmentation correctly isolates the target character from sampled frames.
    Section 3.3 uses Sa2VA masks as reference images; failures are handled morphologically but not measured quantitatively.
  • domain assumption InternVL quality filtering correctly identifies suitable reference images.
    Section 3.3 treats InternVL verdicts as ground truth for completeness, consistency, pose, and blur, without independent validation.
  • domain assumption One-minute video segments are coherent, self-contained narrative units.
    Section 3.1 defines each segment as one story; narrative completeness across arbitrary cut boundaries is assumed.
  • domain assumption MLLM judges provide valid proxies for human preference in video consistency evaluation.
    Section C.4 uses GPT-4o and Gemini scores averaged over rounds; correlation with human judgment is only partially addressed by a 10-participant study.
  • domain assumption YouTube-sourced videos can be redistributed as video IDs and annotations under CC BY-NC 4.0.
    Appendix F releases only IDs and masks, with source videos downloaded independently from YouTube; legal and availability constraints are not analyzed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AnimeShooter: A Multi-Shot Animation Dataset for Reference-Guided Video Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y2KRDPMU

@misc{pith2026250603126,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AnimeShooter: A Multi-Shot Animation Dataset for Reference-Guided Video Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y2KRDPMU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03126}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advances in AI-generated content (AIGC) have significantly accelerated animation production. To produce engaging animations, it is essential to generate coherent multi-shot video clips with narrative scripts and character references. However, existing public datasets primarily focus on real-world scenarios with global descriptions, and lack reference images for consistent character guidance. To bridge this gap, we present AnimeShooter, a reference-guided multi-shot animation dataset. AnimeShooter features comprehensive hierarchical annotations and strong visual consistency across shots through an automated pipeline. Story-level annotations provide an overview of the narrative, including the storyline, key scenes, and main character profiles with reference images, while shot-level annotations decompose the story into consecutive shots, each annotated with scene, characters, and both narrative and descriptive visual captions. Additionally, a dedicated subset, AnimeShooter-audio, offers synchronized audio tracks for each shot, along with audio descriptions and sound sources. To demonstrate the effectiveness of AnimeShooter and establish a baseline for the reference-guided multi-shot video generation task, we introduce AnimeShooterGen, which leverages Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) and video diffusion models. The reference image and previously generated shots are first processed by MLLM to produce representations aware of both reference and context, which are then used as the condition for the diffusion model to decode the subsequent shot. Experimental results show that the model trained on AnimeShooter achieves superior cross-shot visual consistency and adherence to reference visual guidance, which highlight the value of our dataset for coherent animated video generation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03126 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of AnimeShooter. It is a reference-guided multi-shot animation dataset featuring comprehensive hierarchical annotations and strong coherence across shots. At the story level, each sample includes an overall storyline, main scene descriptions, and detailed character profiles with reference images. At the shot level, consecutive shots are annotated with specific scenes, involved characters, and rich visual ca… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Video collection and annotation pipeline. We curate relevant videos from YouTube and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the model architecture. The two core components include the autoregressive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitatively comparisons on multi-shot animation generation. Our method delivers the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualization of using different references in MLLM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The prompt used for multi-shot captioning. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The prompt used for reference image generation. Top subfigure: Segmentation prompt for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The prompt used for constructing AnimeShooter-audio. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example of IP-specific dataset for evaluation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The prompt used for constructing evaluation dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The prompt used for MLLM assessment. generated by CogVideo-LoRA demonstrates a visually discordant art style. In contrast, our proposed AnimeShooterGen achieves superior preservation of character identity, color palette continuity, and stylistic consistency across gen…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Additional qualitative results. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Additional qualitative results. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The prompt used for generating descriptive audio captions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rethinking Position Embedding as a Context Controller for Multi-Reference and Multi-Shot Video Generation

    cs.CV 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SideInfo-RoPE encodes reference-identity agreement as an extra rotary axis, disambiguating similar characters in multi-reference multi-shot video generation while keeping full semantic attention.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [2]

    Frozen in time: A joint video and image encoder for end-to-end retrieval

    Max Bain, Arsha Nagrani, Gül Varol, and Andrew Zisserman. Frozen in time: A joint video and image encoder for end-to-end retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 1728–1738, 2021

  2. [3]

    Activitynet: A large-scale video benchmark for human activity understanding

    Fabian Caba Heilbron, Victor Escorcia, Bernard Ghanem, and Juan Carlos Niebles. Activitynet: A large-scale video benchmark for human activity understanding. In Proceedings of the ieee conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 961–970, 2015

  3. [4]

    Panda-70m: Captioning 70m videos with multiple cross-modality teachers

    Tsai-Shien Chen, Aliaksandr Siarohin, Willi Menapace, Ekaterina Deyneka, Hsiang-wei Chao, Byung Eun Jeon, Yuwei Fang, Hsin-Ying Lee, Jian Ren, Ming-Hsuan Yang, et al. Panda-70m: Captioning 70m videos with multiple cross-modality teachers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 13320–13331, 2024

  4. [5]

    Multi- subject open-set personalization in video generation

    Tsai-Shien Chen, Aliaksandr Siarohin, Willi Menapace, Yuwei Fang, Kwot Sin Lee, Ivan Skorokhodov, Kfir Aberman, Jun-Yan Zhu, Ming-Hsuan Yang, and Sergey Tulyakov. Multi- subject open-set personalization in video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.06187, 2025

  5. [6]

    Internvl: Scaling up vision foundation models and aligning for generic visual-linguistic tasks

    Zhe Chen, Jiannan Wu, Wenhai Wang, Weijie Su, Guo Chen, Sen Xing, Muyan Zhong, Qinglong Zhang, Xizhou Zhu, Lewei Lu, et al. Internvl: Scaling up vision foundation models and aligning for generic visual-linguistic tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 24185–24198, 2024

  6. [7]

    AnimeGamer: Infinite Anime Life Simulation with Next Game State Prediction

    Junhao Cheng, Yuying Ge, Yixiao Ge, Jing Liao, and Ying Shan. Animegamer: Infinite anime life simulation with next game state prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01014, 2025

  7. [8]

    Gemini, 2024

    Google DeepMind. Gemini, 2024

  8. [9]

    Cinema: Coherent multi-subject video generation via mllm-based guidance

    Yufan Deng, Xun Guo, Yizhi Wang, Jacob Zhiyuan Fang, Angtian Wang, Shenghai Yuan, Yiding Yang, Bo Liu, Haibin Huang, and Chongyang Ma. Cinema: Coherent multi-subject video generation via mllm-based guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10391, 2025

Show all 50 references
  1. [10]

    Dreamsim: Learning new dimensions of human visual similarity using synthetic data

    Stephanie Fu, Netanel Tamir, Shobhita Sundaram, Lucy Chai, Richard Zhang, Tali Dekel, and Phillip Isola. Dreamsim: Learning new dimensions of human visual similarity using synthetic data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09344, 2023

  2. [11]

    Talecrafter: Interactive story visualization with multiple characters

    Yuan Gong, Youxin Pang, Xiaodong Cun, Menghan Xia, Yingqing He, Haoxin Chen, Longyue Wang, Yong Zhang, Xintao Wang, Ying Shan, et al. Talecrafter: Interactive story visualization with multiple characters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18247, 2023

  3. [12]

    The llama 3 herd of models

    Aaron Grattafiori, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Alex Vaughan, et al. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783, 2024

  4. [13]

    Mix-of-show: Decentralized low-rank adaptation for multi-concept customization of diffusion models

    Yuchao Gu, Xintao Wang, Jay Zhangjie Wu, Yujun Shi, Yunpeng Chen, Zihan Fan, Wuyou Xiao, Rui Zhao, Shuning Chang, Weijia Wu, et al. Mix-of-show: Decentralized low-rank adaptation for multi-concept customization of diffusion models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys...

  5. [14]

    Roictrl: Boosting instance control for visual generation

    Yuchao Gu, Yipin Zhou, Yunfan Ye, Yixin Nie, Licheng Yu, Pingchuan Ma, Kevin Qinghong Lin, and Mike Zheng Shou. Roictrl: Boosting instance control for visual generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.17949, 2024

  6. [15]

    Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning

    Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, et al. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948, 2025

  7. [16]

    Long context tuning for video generation

    Yuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Ziyan Yang, Zhibei Ma, Zhijie Lin, Zhenheng Yang, Dahua Lin, and Lu Jiang. Long context tuning for video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10589, 2025. 10

  8. [17]

    Anys- tory: Towards unified single and multiple subject personalization in text-to-image generation

    Junjie He, Yuxiang Tuo, Binghui Chen, Chongyang Zhong, Yifeng Geng, and Liefeng Bo. Anys- tory: Towards unified single and multiple subject personalization in text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09503, 2025

  9. [18]

    Id-animator: Zero-shot identity-preserving human video generation

    Xuanhua He, Quande Liu, Shengju Qian, Xin Wang, Tao Hu, Ke Cao, Keyu Yan, and Jie Zhang. Id-animator: Zero-shot identity-preserving human video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15275, 2024

  10. [19]

    Cogvideo: Large-scale pretraining for text-to-video generation via transformers

    Wenyi Hong, Ming Ding, Wendi Zheng, Xinghan Liu, and Jie Tang. Cogvideo: Large-scale pretraining for text-to-video generation via transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15868 , 2022

  11. [20]

    Owl-1: Omni world model for consistent long video generation

    Yuanhui Huang, Wenzhao Zheng, Yuan Gao, Xin Tao, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Owl-1: Omni world model for consistent long video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09600, 2024

  12. [21]

    Conceptmaster: Multi-concept video customization on diffusion transformer models without test-time tuning

    Yuzhou Huang, Ziyang Yuan, Quande Liu, Qiulin Wang, Xintao Wang, Ruimao Zhang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, and Kun Gai. Conceptmaster: Multi-concept video customization on diffusion transformer models without test-time tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04698, 2025

  13. [22]

    Tangoflux: Super fast and faithful text to audio generation with flow matching and clap-ranked preference optimization

    Chia-Yu Hung, Navonil Majumder, Zhifeng Kong, Ambuj Mehrish, Amir Ali Bagherzadeh, Chuan Li, Rafael Valle, Bryan Catanzaro, and Soujanya Poria. Tangoflux: Super fast and faithful text to audio generation with flow matching and clap-ranked preference optimization. arXiv preprin...

  14. [23]

    Exploring the frontiers of animation video generation in the sora era: Method, dataset and benchmark

    Yudong Jiang, Baohan Xu, Siqian Yang, Mingyu Yin, Jing Liu, Chao Xu, Siqi Wang, Yidi Wu, Bingwen Zhu, Jixuan Xu, et al. Exploring the frontiers of animation video generation in the sora era: Method, dataset and benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10255, 2024

  15. [24]

    Videobooth: Diffusion-based video generation with image prompts

    Yuming Jiang, Tianxing Wu, Shuai Yang, Chenyang Si, Dahua Lin, Yu Qiao, Chen Change Loy, and Ziwei Liu. Videobooth: Diffusion-based video generation with image prompts. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6689–6700, 2024

  16. [25]

    Miradata: A large-scale video dataset with long durations and structured captions

    Xuan Ju, Yiming Gao, Zhaoyang Zhang, Ziyang Yuan, Xintao Wang, Ailing Zeng, Yu Xiong, Qiang Xu, and Ying Shan. Miradata: A large-scale video dataset with long durations and structured captions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 37:48955–48970, 2024

  17. [26]

    Animeceleb: Large-scale animation celebheads dataset for head reenactment

    Kangyeol Kim, Sunghyun Park, Jaeseong Lee, Sunghyo Chung, Junsoo Lee, and Jaegul Choo. Animeceleb: Large-scale animation celebheads dataset for head reenactment. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 414–430. Springer, 2022

  18. [27]

    Segment anything

    Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer Whitehead, Alexander C Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, et al. Segment anything. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 4015–4026, 2023

  19. [28]

    Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven Hoi. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. In International conference on machine learning, pages 19730–19742. PMLR, 2023

  20. [29]

    Anim-director: A large multimodal model powered agent for controllable animation video generation

    Yunxin Li, Haoyuan Shi, Baotian Hu, Longyue Wang, Jiashun Zhu, Jinyi Xu, Zhen Zhao, and Min Zhang. Anim-director: A large multimodal model powered agent for controllable animation video generation. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers, pages 1–11, 2024

  21. [30]

    Phantom: Subject-consistent video generation via cross-modal alignment

    Lijie Liu, Tianxiang Ma, Bingchuan Li, Zhuowei Chen, Jiawei Liu, Qian He, and Xinglong Wu. Phantom: Subject-consistent video generation via cross-modal alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11079, 2025

  22. [31]

    Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection

    Shilong Liu, Zhaoyang Zeng, Tianhe Ren, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Jie Yang, Qing Jiang, Chunyuan Li, Jianwei Yang, Hang Su, et al. Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 38–55. Springer...

  23. [32]

    Nvila: Efficient frontier visual language models

    Zhijian Liu, Ligeng Zhu, Baifeng Shi, Zhuoyang Zhang, Yuming Lou, Shang Yang, Haocheng Xi, Shiyi Cao, Yuxian Gu, Dacheng Li, et al. Nvila: Efficient frontier visual language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04468, 2024

  24. [33]

    Videostudio: Generating consistent-content and multi-scene videos

    Fuchen Long, Zhaofan Qiu, Ting Yao, and Tao Mei. Videostudio: Generating consistent-content and multi-scene videos. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 468–485. Springer, 2024

  25. [34]

    Gpt-4o: Multimodal large language model, 2025

    OpenAI. Gpt-4o: Multimodal large language model, 2025

  26. [35]

    Sakuga-42m dataset: Scaling up cartoon research

    Zhenglin Pan. Sakuga-42m dataset: Scaling up cartoon research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07425, 2024

  27. [36]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 4195–4205, 2023

  28. [37]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas Müller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023

  29. [38]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning , p...

  30. [39]

    Videofactory: Swap attention in spatiotemporal diffusions for text-to-video generation

    Wenjing Wang, Huan Yang, Zixi Tuo, Huiguo He, Junchen Zhu, Jianlong Fu, and Jiaying Liu. Videofactory: Swap attention in spatiotemporal diffusions for text-to-video generation. 2023

  31. [40]

    Internvid: A large-scale video-text dataset for multimodal understanding and generation

    Yi Wang, Yinan He, Yizhuo Li, Kunchang Li, Jiashuo Yu, Xin Ma, Xinhao Li, Guo Chen, Xinyuan Chen, Yaohui Wang, et al. Internvid: A large-scale video-text dataset for multimodal understanding and generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06942, 2023

  32. [41]

    Dreamrunner: Fine-grained storytelling video generation with retrieval-augmented motion adaptation

    Zun Wang, Jialu Li, Han Lin, Jaehong Yoon, and Mohit Bansal. Dreamrunner: Fine-grained storytelling video generation with retrieval-augmented motion adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16657, 2024

  33. [42]

    Understanding animation

    Paul Wells. Understanding animation. Routledge, 2013

  34. [43]

    Automated movie generation via multi-agent cot planning

    Weijia Wu, Zeyu Zhu, and Mike Zheng Shou. Automated movie generation via multi-agent cot planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07314, 2025

  35. [44]

    Pandora: Towards general world model with natural language actions and video states

    Jiannan Xiang, Guangyi Liu, Yi Gu, Qiyue Gao, Yuting Ning, Yuheng Zha, Zeyu Feng, Tianhua Tao, Shibo Hao, Yemin Shi, et al. Pandora: Towards general world model with natural language actions and video states. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09455, 2024

  36. [45]

    Dynamicrafter: Animating open-domain images with video diffusion priors

    Jinbo Xing, Menghan Xia, Yong Zhang, Haoxin Chen, Wangbo Yu, Hanyuan Liu, Gongye Liu, Xintao Wang, Ying Shan, and Tien-Tsin Wong. Dynamicrafter: Animating open-domain images with video diffusion priors. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 399–417. Springer, 2024

  37. [46]

    Lvd-2m: A long-take video dataset with temporally dense captions

    Tianwei Xiong, Yuqing Wang, Daquan Zhou, Zhijie Lin, Jiashi Feng, and Xihui Liu. Lvd-2m: A long-take video dataset with temporally dense captions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10816, 2024

  38. [47]

    Vript: A video is worth thousands of words

    Dongjie Yang, Suyuan Huang, Chengqiang Lu, Xiaodong Han, Haoxin Zhang, Yan Gao, Yao Hu, and Hai Zhao. Vript: A video is worth thousands of words. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:57240–57261, 2024

  39. [48]

    Seed-story: Multimodal long story generation with large language model

    Shuai Yang, Yuying Ge, Yang Li, Yukang Chen, Yixiao Ge, Ying Shan, and Yingcong Chen. Seed-story: Multimodal long story generation with large language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08683, 2024

  40. [49]

    Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models

    Hu Ye, Jun Zhang, Sibo Liu, Xiao Han, and Wei Yang. Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721, 2023. 12

  41. [50]

    The girl said goodbye to the bear

    Haobo Yuan, Xiangtai Li, Tao Zhang, Zilong Huang, Shilin Xu, Shunping Ji, Yunhai Tong, Lu Qi, Jiashi Feng, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Sa2va: Marrying sam2 with llava for dense grounded understanding of images and videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04001, 2025. 13 A Details for Data C...

  42. [51]

    a cow is mooning

    These audio captions subsequently guide TangoFlux in synthesizing audio tracks, which are then merged with the video sequences. However, results reveal substantial limitations in current simplistic zero-shot audio generation paradigms. Primarily, the decoupled generation proce...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.