Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 10 cited by

UNIC: Unified In-Context Video Editing

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single diffusion transformer, with no adapter modules and no inversion stage, can perform six distinct video editing tasks by concatenating the source video, the noisy target, and task conditions into one token sequence that full 3D…

desk verdict UNIC is a clean in-context unification of six video editing tasks, but its benchmark shares construction with its training data, so the 'superior on each task' claim is softer than it looks. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04216 v1 pith:EG663Y3J submitted 2025-06-04 cs.CV

Zixuan Ye , Xuanhua He , Quande Liu , Qiulin Wang , Xintao Wang , Pengfei Wan , Di Zhang , Kun Gai
show 2 more authors
Qifeng Chen Wenhan Luo
This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords in-contextvideoeditingdiffusiontransformerunifiedtokenizationrotarypositionembeddingconditionbiasmulti-modalconditioningtaskcomposition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that most video editing operations are the same operation once the inputs are reformatted. UNIC writes every input as one of three kinds of tokens: the noisy target video, the reference video, and task-specific condition tokens, then concatenates them into a single sequence that the diffusion transformer's native 3D attention reads end to end. This removes both task-specific adapter modules and the extra DDIM-inversion stage used by prior editing methods. Two small mechanisms, task-aware RoPE indices and a learnable condition bias, keep the mixed sequence from collapsing into token collisions and task confusion. If the central claim is right, a single model replaces the current collection of task-specific video editors and can combine tasks it was never explicitly trained to combine.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the concatenated token sequence $z = [z_{\text{tar}}; z_{\text{ref}}; z_{\text{cond}}]$ run through the native 3D full attention of a pre-trained video diffusion transformer, a 1B-parameter DiT fine-tuned with flow matching. Two mechanisms stabilize it. Task-aware RoPE assigns rotary positional indices by task type: conditions with direct frame correspondence, such as a reference video, camera poses, or a propagation first frame, reuse the noisy video's indices $0$ to $N-1$, while non-frame-aligned conditions such as ID images and style references get non-overlapping slots at a base offset $m=N$ plus a fixed task offset, with ID at $+100$ and style at $+200$, and the reference video shifted by $+300$ for camera tasks to signal soft guidance. Condition bias is a zero-initialized, learnable embedding added to every token of a given task type before attention, letting the model tell tasks apart even when they share a modality, since an image can mean an identity to insert, a style to follow, or nothing to delete.

What would settle it

Build a test set of the same six tasks in which the ground-truth edited videos come from human editors working with manual tools or established editing software instead of from the paper's SAM2/inpaint/ControlNet pipelines, then run UNIC and the same task-specific baselines on those pairs; if identity similarity, style scores, or camera alignment drop substantially on the human-made pairs, or if task-specific models trained on human data overtake it, the in-context tokenization is not what is carrying the result, the synthetic data pipeline is.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim, stated in Section 3.2, is that 'the specific combination of reference video tokens and multi-modal condition tokens can represent any video editing task.' On that basis, UNIC concatenates the noisy target latent $z_{\text{tar}}$, the reference video tokens $z_{\text{ref}}$, and the condition tokens $z_{\text{cond}}$ along the frame dimension into one sequence $z = [z_{\text{tar}}; z_{\text{ref}}; z_{\text{cond}}]$, and lets the transformer's full 3D self-attention perform the editing in context. The authors argue this removes the two standard scaffolding pieces of video editing, inversion-based noise initialization and per-condition control modules, leaving only modality-specific tokenizers that any method needs anyway. On a self-constructed six-task benchmark, the paper reports that this single model matches or beats task-specific systems on identity alignment, style transfer, and camera control, and that stacking conditions from different tasks produces coherent outputs, such as re-camera control plus stylization in one pass, an ability it calls emergent task composition.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the machine-generated training videos are faithful stand-ins for real editing: identity edits are produced by SAM2 segmentation, cv2.inpaint, and a trained ControlNet cleanup, and stylization pairs are made by generating a stylized video with a T2V model and then converting it back to a realistic counterpart with a tile-based ControlNet; if those pipelines encode shortcuts or artifacts, the unified model learns those rather than genuine editing, and its benchmark numbers will not reproduce on real editing inputs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single frozen-architecture model handles local edits (ID insert/swap/delete), global edits (stylization, first-frame propagation), and re-rendering (camera control) without adapters, eliminating both the parameter overhead of control modules and the doubled inference cost of DDIM inversion.
  • New editing tasks reduce to providing a tokenizer and a RoPE slot: audio-driven lip-sync or depth-guided edits would not require new network modules, only new condition tokens.
  • Conditions from different tasks can be stacked at inference time, for example re-camera control plus stylization or ID insert plus stylization, producing coherent outputs the model was not explicitly trained on, which is the paper's emergent task-composition claim.
  • Sequential training, hard-to-easy or easy-to-hard, is the recipe that makes unification work; joint training from scratch learns the easy tasks but performs poorly on the hardest one, camera control.
  • Both stabilizing mechanisms matter together: condition bias alone or task-aware RoPE alone improves over the baseline, but the full pair gives the best identity, style, and camera metrics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The formulation implies that video editing and video generation are the same capability, generation with extra reference tokens appended; if so, the boundary between editing models and base generators should keep dissolving, and the long-term test is whether the same recipe scales to dozens of condition types in one sequence.
  • The benchmark numbers rest on training pairs the paper generated itself, SAM2 masks plus inpainting plus a trained ControlNet for identity edits, and a stylized T2V video converted back to realistic frames for stylization; a reader should expect real-world performance to be set by how faithfully those pipelines model actual edits, and a human-annotated test set would settle it.
  • The fixed task-offset scheme is a convention, not a necessity: offsets could be learned or dynamically allocated, and the practice of filling unused ID slots with black images shows the model relies on slot discipline, so pushing to many concurrent conditions may need a softer addressing scheme.
  • If the synthetic-data concern is borne out, the architecture insight may still survive: the same in-context sequence could be re-trained on high-quality, human-verified pairs, separating the tokenization claim from the data claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes UNIC, a unified in-context video editing framework that represents all conditioning inputs (reference video, images, camera poses, text) as tokens concatenated with the noisy latent along the frame dimension, and processes them jointly with the native 3D attention of a diffusion transformer, avoiding task-specific adapters and DDIM inversion. To make joint training across six tasks stable, the paper introduces task-aware RoPE indices and per-task learnable condition biases. The model is trained on a mix of self-constructed synthetic pairs for ID insert/swap/delete and stylization (Appendix B) and the ReCamMaster multi-camera dataset for re-camera control; evaluation uses a self-constructed benchmark covering the six tasks (Appendix A). The paper reports comparisons with task-specific and unified baselines, ablations on training order, task-specific versus unified training, and the proposed components, and demonstrates qualitative task-composition examples.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, UNIC would be a meaningful step toward unified video editing because it removes the need for task-specific control modules and inversion, and it shows that a single frozen architecture can handle several heterogeneous editing tasks. The task-aware RoPE and condition bias are simple, well-motivated additions that address real problems in concatenating variable-length multi-modal tokens, and the ablations (Tables 2–4) provide useful evidence for their benefit. The unified training is also shown to be competitive with task-specific training. However, the validity of the central empirical claims is currently limited by the self-constructed training/evaluation data, which share the same synthetic pairing pipelines, and by several overstatements in the abstract and conclusion relative to the presented numbers.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B.1–B.2 and Appendix A] The evaluation benchmark is constructed from the same synthetic pairing pipelines used to build the training data, which is a load-bearing weakness for the claim of general editing ability. For ID insertion (B.1), the reference video is produced by SAM2 segmentation, cv2.inpaint, and a ControlNet artifact-removal that is trained on the original target video; for stylization (B.2), the source video is generated by first creating a stylized T2V video and then converting it back to realistic with a tile-based ControlNet. The benchmark cases in A.1–A.4 are generated by the same procedures. As a result, Table 1 does not demonstrate generalization to independently created edits or to real editing operations; the model may have learned to invert the specific degradation used to create the reference rather than to perform the task. Please provide an external benchmark or a user study with real editing operations, and/or an analysis of performance under distribution shift.
  2. [Abstract and Table 1] The abstract and conclusion state that the method achieves "superior performance on each task," but Table 1 shows concrete counterexamples: on ID Delete, VideoPainter achieves PSNR 22.987 vs. 19.171 and RefVideo-CLIP 0.920 vs. 0.900 for Ours; on Stylization, StyleMaster achieves CSD-Score 0.306 vs. 0.259 for Ours. Even if the unified model is competitive overall, the claim of superiority on every task is not supported by the presented numbers. Please qualify the claim to match the data and discuss where and why the method trails specialized baselines.
  3. [Section 3.2 and Section 4] The paper claims in Section 3.2 that "the specific combination of reference video tokens and multi-modal condition tokens can represent any video editing task," and the abstract highlights "emergent task composition abilities." However, only six tasks are evaluated, and task composition is shown only qualitatively in Fig. 1, with no quantitative metric or comparison. These claims go beyond the evidence presented. Please either provide systematic composition experiments or soften the universality/emergence claims to reflect the demonstrated scope.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2.2] In Eq. (4), the base offset m is defined as the video length N, but in Appendix C.1 the ID and style tokens use a fixed base offset of 6. Please clarify whether these examples assume a fixed frame count N=6 and unify the notation.
  2. [Section 4.1] For the propagation versions Ours(Prop) in ID Swap/Delete and Stylization, the text says the edited first frame is obtained using Insert-Anything, FLUX, and the first frame of StyleMaster; please report which tool is used for each task, since this affects comparability.
  3. [Appendix C.1] The text conditioning is referred to as "Text T5 Tokenizer" but the specific T5 model variant is not cited, and it is unclear whether text tokens are included in the concatenated sequence in the same way as the other condition tokens. Please clarify and cite the text encoder.
  4. [General] The paper does not state whether the benchmark and trained model will be released. Given that the benchmark is self-constructed and central to the evaluation, please add an availability statement for code and data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: UNIC's claims are empirical and its three-token formulation is a framing, not a derived result.

full rationale

UNIC is an empirical system paper; it does not claim a formal derivation of a prediction from first principles. The three-token formulation (noisy tokens, reference video tokens, multi-modal condition tokens) is a design taxonomy used to motivate concatenation, not a theorem; Section 3.1's statement that this 'can represent any video editing task' is definitional framing rather than a derived result. The main quantitative claim ('superior performance on each task') rests on a self-constructed benchmark (Appendix A) whose construction shares tools and pipelines with the training data (Appendix B), which is a legitimate generalization/validity concern and a possible shortcut risk, but not circularity: the evaluation cases are separate from training, and the reported numbers are measurements, not quantities forced by construction or by fitted parameters. Overlapping-author citations (ReCamMaster [17], StyleMaster [11], FullDiT [47]) are used as baselines, dataset sources, or prior motivation; none is load-bearing for UNIC's own architecture or for a uniqueness claim, and no argument in the paper reduces to a self-citation. The 'emergent task composition' claim is qualitative and not derived from a fitted quantity. Therefore no step in the paper's claimed derivation chain is equivalent to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework relies on several unproven domain assumptions: representational sufficiency of three token types, sufficiency of full attention for content preservation, and fidelity of synthetically constructed training data. The hand-fixed RoPE offsets (100, 200, 300) and slot count (3) are design choices, not learned or searched. No invented physical entities are introduced; the added components are learnable embeddings and index conventions.

free parameters (4)
  • Task-specific RoPE offset for ID image tokens = 100
    Set in Appendix C.1 to start ID token indices at N+100; chosen by hand to avoid overlap, no search reported.
  • Task-specific RoPE offset for style tokens = 200
    Set in Appendix C.1 so style tokens start at N+200; hand-chosen to keep style separate from ID slots.
  • RoPE shift for reference video in re-camera control = 300
    Set in Appendix C.1; reference video tokens shifted by +300 for soft-reference tasks, a design choice without a dedicated ablation.
  • ID token slot count = 3
    Defined in Appendix C.1; supports up to three ID images, with remaining slots filled by black-image embeddings; capacity is hand-chosen.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Flow matching training objective (Eq. 1) with Gaussian prior x0 and linear interpolation is a valid way to train and fine-tune the video DiT.
    Inherited from prior flow-matching text-to-video models; not re-derived in this work.
  • domain assumption Every video editing task can be expressed as the combination of noisy tokens, reference video tokens, and multi-modal condition tokens.
    Section 3.1 states this representational claim; it is not proven and is central to the framework.
  • domain assumption Concatenating all tokens along the frame dimension and applying full 3D attention is sufficient to preserve reference video content and inject conditions without adapters.
    Section 3.2.1; supported only by the paper's internal experiments.
  • ad hoc to paper The synthetic stylization and ID training pairs produced by SAM2, inpainting, a trained ControlNet, and T2V-to-Real conversion are valid training targets for real editing.
    Appendix B.1-B.2 describes this pipeline; if these pairs contain artifacts, the model may learn pipeline-specific shortcuts.
  • domain assumption Hand-fixed RoPE offsets (100, 200, 300) and slot count 3 remain valid across variable video lengths.
    Appendix C.1 defines these constants; the paper does not analyze failure when videos are longer or tasks have more conditions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of UNIC: Unified In-Context Video Editing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EG663Y3J

@misc{pith2026250604216,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: UNIC: Unified In-Context Video Editing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EG663Y3J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04216}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advances in text-to-video generation have sparked interest in generative video editing tasks. Previous methods often rely on task-specific architectures (e.g., additional adapter modules) or dedicated customizations (e.g., DDIM inversion), which limit the integration of versatile editing conditions and the unification of various editing tasks. In this paper, we introduce UNified In-Context Video Editing (UNIC), a simple yet effective framework that unifies diverse video editing tasks within a single model in an in-context manner. To achieve this unification, we represent the inputs of various video editing tasks as three types of tokens: the source video tokens, the noisy video latent, and the multi-modal conditioning tokens that vary according to the specific editing task. Based on this formulation, our key insight is to integrate these three types into a single consecutive token sequence and jointly model them using the native attention operations of DiT, thereby eliminating the need for task-specific adapter designs. Nevertheless, direct task unification under this framework is challenging, leading to severe token collisions and task confusion due to the varying video lengths and diverse condition modalities across tasks. To address these, we introduce task-aware RoPE to facilitate consistent temporal positional encoding, and condition bias that enables the model to clearly differentiate different editing tasks. This allows our approach to adaptively perform different video editing tasks by referring the source video and varying condition tokens "in context", and support flexible task composition. To validate our method, we construct a unified video editing benchmark containing six representative video editing tasks. Results demonstrate that our unified approach achieves superior performance on each task and exhibits emergent task composition abilities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04216 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Unified In-Context Video Editing enables unified video editing and emergent task composition. Here we demonstrate the unification of six representative tasks, including ID In￾sert/Delete/Swap, Re-Camera Control, Stylization, and Propagation. the reference video. However, these methods often fail to achieve ideal results and will inevitably introduce an additional stage, doubling the inference steps and cost. Another… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Architectural comparison for incorporating conditioning signals. (a) Extra Stage: Utilizes DDIM inversion on a reference video to derive inverted noise. (b) Extra One-to-One Control Modules: Employs dedicated, separate modules to process each control signal (e.g., reference video, multi-modal signals) and inject guidance into the diffusion model. (c) In-Context Video Editing (Ours): Our proposed method directly inte… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overall Pipeline of Unified In-Context Video Editing. Our framework utilizes a unified transformer architecture for video editing. The model input is created by concatenating noisy tokens, reference video tokens, and multi-modal condition tokens (task-specific controls like images), these combined tokens form a single input sequence along the frame dimension. By simply modifying the multi-modal condition tokens, thi… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LiveEdit: Towards Real-Time Diffusion-Based Streaming Video Editing

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    LiveEdit distills a bidirectional video foundation model into a unidirectional streaming editor via three-stage training plus mask caching to reach 12.66 FPS with stable edits.

  2. ContextMaster: Interactive Multi-Shot Video Creation via Fixed-Budget Sparse Context Routing

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A unified video model with role-aware context and fixed-budget sparse attention enables interactive multi-shot generation, reference conditioning, and editing at 16 FPS on a single GPU.

  3. JoyAI-Video-Edit: Real-Time Open-Ended Video Editing with Autoregressive Diffusion

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 16B causal autoregressive diffusion system reports real-time 720p video editing at about 30 FPS on one B200 GPU, beating streaming editors and matching several offline systems in benchmark scores.

  4. FlexComposer: Unified Video Compositing from Images to Dynamic Footage with Flexible Trajectory Control

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single video-diffusion framework composites both static images and dynamic footage along user-defined trajectories by transporting canonical foreground latents directly into the background latent sequence.

  5. VIPER: Visual In-Context Physics Reasoning for Physically Plausible Video Generation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An MLLM extracts transferable physical cues from a reference video and conditions a pretrained I2V generator so new scenes follow that physics without exhaustive prompts.

  6. FlowMimic: Mask-free Visual Editing and Generation with Pixel-pair Warped Flow Field for Online Video Editing Data Generation and Modality Mimicry

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Video editing can be learned from image-edit pairs that are synthetically warped into videos, plus self-distillation losses that align image and video outputs.

  7. ReBind: Multi-Reference Video Editing via Structured Instructions with Explicit Reference Relationships

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Writing editing instructions that explicitly bind each attribute to a reference image via `<Image_N>` tokens substantially improves multi-reference video editing, and a specialized MLLM trained with GRPO generates the...

  8. Under One Sun: Multi-Object Generative Perception of Materials and Illumination

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Factorizing video editing into semantic-token anchoring and motion-restoration pre-training produces strong zero-shot and SOTA open-source instruction-guided video edits without heavy external structural priors.

  9. VideoCanvas: Unified Video Completion from Arbitrary Spatiotemporal Patches via In-Context Conditioning

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single diffusion model with in-context conditioning and fractional RoPE positions completes videos from arbitrary spatio-temporal image patches.

  10. O-DisCo-Edit: Object Distortion Control for Unified Realistic Video Editing

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A video editor trained on randomly distorted objects, then steered by adaptive noise at inference, is claimed to surpass dedicated and unified editors across eight tasks with far less training.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 10 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Videocrafter1: Open diffusion models for high-quality video generation, 2023

    Haoxin Chen, Menghan Xia, Yingqing He, Yong Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Shaoshu Yang, Jinbo Xing, Yaofang Liu, Qifeng Chen, Xintao Wang, Chao Weng, and Ying Shan. Videocrafter1: Open diffusion models for high-quality video generation, 2023

    2023

  2. [2]

    Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianxiao Yang, Jianyuan Zeng, Jiayu Wang, Jingfeng Zhang, Jingren Zhou, Jinkai Wang, Jixuan Chen, Kai Zhu, Kang Zhao, Keyu Yan, Lianghua Huang, Mengyang Feng, Ningyi Zhang, Pandeng Li, Pingyu Wu, Ruihang Chu, Ruili Feng, Shiwei Zhang, Siyang Sun, Tao Fang, Tianxing Wa...

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Cogvideo: Large-scale pretraining for text-to-video generation via transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15868, 2022

    Wenyi Hong, Ming Ding, Wendi Zheng, Xinghan Liu, and Jie Tang. Cogvideo: Large-scale pretraining for text-to-video generation via transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15868, 2022

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072, 2024

    Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Ltx-video: Realtime video latent diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.00103, 2024

    Yoav HaCohen, Nisan Chiprut, Benny Brazowski, Daniel Shalem, Dudu Moshe, Eitan Richard- son, Eran Levin, Guy Shiran, Nir Zabari, Ori Gordon, et al. Ltx-video: Realtime video latent diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.00103, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Kling ai.https://klingai.com/, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Id-animator: Zero-shot identity-preserving human video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15275, 2024

    Xuanhua He, Quande Liu, Shengju Qian, Xin Wang, Tao Hu, Ke Cao, Keyu Yan, and Jie Zhang. Id-animator: Zero-shot identity-preserving human video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15275, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Magic mirror: Id-preserved video generation in video diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03931, 2025

    Yuechen Zhang, Yaoyang Liu, Bin Xia, Bohao Peng, Zexin Yan, Eric Lo, and Jiaya Jia. Magic mirror: Id-preserved video generation in video diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03931, 2025

    arXiv 2025

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Identity-preserving text-to-video generation by frequency decomposition.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.17440, 2024

    Shenghai Yuan, Jinfa Huang, Xianyi He, Yunyuan Ge, Yujun Shi, Liuhan Chen, Jiebo Luo, and Li Yuan. Identity-preserving text-to-video generation by frequency decomposition.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.17440, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Stylecrafter: Enhancing stylized text-to-video generation with style adapter.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00330, 2023

    Gongye Liu, Menghan Xia, Yong Zhang, Haoxin Chen, Jinbo Xing, Yibo Wang, Xintao Wang, Yujiu Yang, and Ying Shan. Stylecrafter: Enhancing stylized text-to-video generation with style adapter.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00330, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Stylemas- ter: Stylize your video with artistic generation and translation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07744, 2024

    Zixuan Ye, Huijuan Huang, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, and Wenhan Luo. Stylemas- ter: Stylize your video with artistic generation and translation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07744, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Generative video propagation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19761, 2024

    Shaoteng Liu, Tianyu Wang, Jui-Hsien Wang, Qing Liu, Zhifei Zhang, Joon-Young Lee, Yijun Li, Bei Yu, Zhe Lin, Soo Ye Kim, et al. Generative video propagation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19761, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Anyv2v: A plug-and-play framework for any video-to-video editing tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14468, 2024

    Max Ku, Cong Wei, Weiming Ren, Huan Yang, and Wenhu Chen. Anyv2v: A plug-and-play framework for any video-to-video editing tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14468, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Videoany- door: High-fidelity video object insertion with precise motion control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01427, 2025

    Yuanpeng Tu, Hao Luo, Xi Chen, Sihui Ji, Xiang Bai, and Hengshuang Zhao. Videoany- door: High-fidelity video object insertion with precise motion control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01427, 2025. 10

    2025 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Cococo: Improving text-guided video inpainting for better consistency, controllability and compatibility

    Bojia Zi, Shihao Zhao, Xianbiao Qi, Jianan Wang, Yukai Shi, Qianyu Chen, Bin Liang, Rong Xiao, Kam-Fai Wong, and Lei Zhang. Cococo: Improving text-guided video inpainting for better consistency, controllability and compatibility. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artific...

    2025

  8. [16]

    Video diffusion models are strong video inpainter

    Minhyeok Lee, Suhwan Cho, Chajin Shin, Jungho Lee, Sunghun Yang, and Sangyoun Lee. Video diffusion models are strong video inpainter. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 39, pages 4526–4533, 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    Recammaster: Camera-controlled generative rendering from a single video.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11647, 2025

    Jianhong Bai, Menghan Xia, Xiao Fu, Xintao Wang, Lianrui Mu, Jinwen Cao, Zuozhu Liu, Haoji Hu, Xiang Bai, Pengfei Wan, et al. Recammaster: Camera-controlled generative rendering from a single video.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11647, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Video-p2p: Video editing with cross-attention control

    Shaoteng Liu, Yuechen Zhang, Wenbo Li, Zhe Lin, and Jiaya Jia. Video-p2p: Video editing with cross-attention control. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8599–8608, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Flatten: optical flow-guided attention for consistent text-to-video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05922, 2023

    Yuren Cong, Mengmeng Xu, Christian Simon, Shoufa Chen, Jiawei Ren, Yanping Xie, Juan- Manuel Perez-Rua, Bodo Rosenhahn, Tao Xiang, and Sen He. Flatten: optical flow-guided attention for consistent text-to-video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05922, 2023

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07598, 2025

    Zeyinzi Jiang, Zhen Han, Chaojie Mao, Jingfeng Zhang, Yulin Pan, and Yu Liu. Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07598, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Videocomposer: Compositional video synthesis with motion controllability.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024

    Xiang Wang, Hangjie Yuan, Shiwei Zhang, Dayou Chen, Jiuniu Wang, Yingya Zhang, Yujun Shen, Deli Zhao, and Jingren Zhou. Videocomposer: Compositional video synthesis with motion controllability.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13077, 2023

    Yabo Zhang, Yuxiang Wei, Dongsheng Jiang, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, and Qi Tian. Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13077, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Revideo: Remake a video with motion and content control.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:18481–18505, 2024

    Chong Mou, Mingdeng Cao, Xintao Wang, Zhaoyang Zhang, Ying Shan, and Jian Zhang. Revideo: Remake a video with motion and content control.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:18481–18505, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    An Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Haoran Wei, et al. Qwen2. 5 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15115, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Longbench v2: Towards deeper understanding and reasoning on realistic long-context multitasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15204, 2024

    Yushi Bai, Shangqing Tu, Jiajie Zhang, Hao Peng, Xiaozhi Wang, Xin Lv, Shulin Cao, Jiazheng Xu, Lei Hou, Yuxiao Dong, et al. Longbench v2: Towards deeper understanding and reasoning on realistic long-context multitasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15204, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, et al. Qwen2. 5-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Internvideo2

    Yi Wang, Xinhao Li, Ziang Yan, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Xiangyu Zeng, Chenting Wang, Changlian Ma, Haian Huang, Jianfei Gao, et al. Internvideo2. 5: Empowering video mllms with long and rich context modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12386, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Longvila: Scaling long-context visual language models for long videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10188, 2024

    Yukang Chen, Fuzhao Xue, Dacheng Li, Qinghao Hu, Ligeng Zhu, Xiuyu Li, Yunhao Fang, Haotian Tang, Shang Yang, Zhijian Liu, et al. Longvila: Scaling long-context visual language models for long videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10188, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Insert anything: Image insertion via in-context editing in dit.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15009, 2025

    Wensong Song, Hong Jiang, Zongxing Yang, Ruijie Quan, and Yi Yang. Insert anything: Image insertion via in-context editing in dit.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15009, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Ominicontrol: Minimal and universal control for diffusion transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15098, 2024

    Zhenxiong Tan, Songhua Liu, Xingyi Yang, Qiaochu Xue, and Xinchao Wang. Ominicontrol: Minimal and universal control for diffusion transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15098, 2024. 11

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Omnigen: Unified image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11340, 2024

    Shitao Xiao, Yueze Wang, Junjie Zhou, Huaying Yuan, Xingrun Xing, Ruiran Yan, Chaofan Li, Shuting Wang, Tiejun Huang, and Zheng Liu. Omnigen: Unified image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11340, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Videopainter: Any-length video inpainting and editing with plug-and-play context control

    Yuxuan Bian, Zhaoyang Zhang, Xuan Ju, Mingdeng Cao, Liangbin Xie, Ying Shan, and Qiang Xu. Videopainter: Any-length video inpainting and editing with plug-and-play context control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05639, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Motionctrl: A unified and flexible motion controller for video generation

    Zhouxia Wang, Ziyang Yuan, Xintao Wang, Yaowei Li, Tianshui Chen, Menghan Xia, Ping Luo, and Ying Shan. Motionctrl: A unified and flexible motion controller for video generation. InACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers, pages 1–11, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Cinemaster: A 3d-aware and controllable framework for cinematic text-to-video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08639, 2025

    Qinghe Wang, Yawen Luo, Xiaoyu Shi, Xu Jia, Huchuan Lu, Tianfan Xue, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, and Kun Gai. Cinemaster: A 3d-aware and controllable framework for cinematic text-to-video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08639, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    3dtrajmaster: Mastering 3d trajectory for multi-entity motion in video generation

    FU Xiao, Xian Liu, Xintao Wang, Sida Peng, Menghan Xia, Xiaoyu Shi, Ziyang Yuan, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, and Dahua Lin. 3dtrajmaster: Mastering 3d trajectory for multi-entity motion in video generation. InThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    2024

  28. [36]

    Dreamvideo-2: Zero-shot subject-driven video customization with precise motion control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13830, 2024

    Yujie Wei, Shiwei Zhang, Hangjie Yuan, Xiang Wang, Haonan Qiu, Rui Zhao, Yutong Feng, Feng Liu, Zhizhong Huang, Jiaxin Ye, et al. Dreamvideo-2: Zero-shot subject-driven video customization with precise motion control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13830, 2024

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Conceptmaster: Multi-concept video customization on diffusion transformer models without test-time tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04698, 2025

    Yuzhou Huang, Ziyang Yuan, Quande Liu, Qiulin Wang, Xintao Wang, Ruimao Zhang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, and Kun Gai. Conceptmaster: Multi-concept video customization on diffusion transformer models without test-time tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04698, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Syncammaster: Synchronizing multi-camera video generation from diverse viewpoints.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07760, 2024

    Jianhong Bai, Menghan Xia, Xintao Wang, Ziyang Yuan, Xiao Fu, Zuozhu Liu, Haoji Hu, Pengfei Wan, and Di Zhang. Syncammaster: Synchronizing multi-camera video generation from diverse viewpoints.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07760, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Follow-your-canvas: Higher-resolution video outpaint- ing with extensive content generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01055, 2024

    Qihua Chen, Yue Ma, Hongfa Wang, Junkun Yuan, Wenzhe Zhao, Qi Tian, Hongmei Wang, Shaobo Min, Qifeng Chen, and Wei Liu. Follow-your-canvas: Higher-resolution video outpaint- ing with extensive content generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01055, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Magicedit: High-fidelity and temporally coherent video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14749, 2023

    Jun Hao Liew, Hanshu Yan, Jianfeng Zhang, Zhongcong Xu, and Jiashi Feng. Magicedit: High-fidelity and temporally coherent video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14749, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3836–3847, 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    Instruct-imagen: Image generation with multi-modal instruction

    Hexiang Hu, Kelvin CK Chan, Yu-Chuan Su, Wenhu Chen, Yandong Li, Kihyuk Sohn, Yang Zhao, Xue Ben, Boqing Gong, William Cohen, et al. Instruct-imagen: Image generation with multi-modal instruction. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognit...

    2024

  35. [43]

    Ace: All-round creator and editor following instructions via diffusion transformer

    Zhen Han, Zeyinzi Jiang, Yulin Pan, Jingfeng Zhang, Chaojie Mao, Chenwei Xie, Yu Liu, and Jingren Zhou. Ace: All-round creator and editor following instructions via diffusion transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00086, 2024

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Unireal: Universal image generation and editing via learning real-world dynamics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07774, 2024

    Xi Chen, Zhifei Zhang, He Zhang, Yuqian Zhou, Soo Ye Kim, Qing Liu, Yijun Li, Jianming Zhang, Nanxuan Zhao, Yilin Wang, et al. Unireal: Universal image generation and editing via learning real-world dynamics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07774, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    One diffusion to generate them all.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16318, 2024

    Duong H Le, Tuan Pham, Sangho Lee, Christopher Clark, Aniruddha Kembhavi, Stephan Mandt, Ranjay Krishna, and Jiasen Lu. One diffusion to generate them all.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16318, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Dreamo: A unified framework for image customization

    Chong Mou, Yanze Wu, Wenxu Wu, Zinan Guo, Pengze Zhang, Yufeng Cheng, Yiming Luo, Fei Ding, Shiwen Zhang, Xinghui Li, et al. Dreamo: A unified framework for image customization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16915, 2025. 12

    2025

  39. [47]

    Fulldit: Multi-task video generative foundation model with full attention

    Xuan Ju, Weicai Ye, Quande Liu, Qiulin Wang, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, Kun Gai, and Qiang Xu. Fulldit: Multi-task video generative foundation model with full attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19907, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers

    Mathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou, Julien Mairal, Piotr Bojanowski, and Armand Joulin. Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 9650–9660, 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. InInternational conference on machine learning, pag...

    2021

  42. [50]

    Measuring style similarity in diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01292, 2024

    Gowthami Somepalli, Anubhav Gupta, Kamal Gupta, Shramay Palta, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping, Abhinav Shrivastava, and Tom Goldstein. Measuring style similarity in diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01292, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Style injection in diffusion: A training-free approach for adapting large-scale diffusion models for style transfer

    Jiwoo Chung, Sangeek Hyun, and Jae-Pil Heo. Style injection in diffusion: A training-free approach for adapting large-scale diffusion models for style transfer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8795–8805, 2024

    2024

  44. [52]

    Cami2v: Camera- controlled image-to-video diffusion model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15957, 2024

    Guangcong Zheng, Teng Li, Rui Jiang, Yehao Lu, Tao Wu, and Xi Li. Cami2v: Camera- controlled image-to-video diffusion model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15957, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Vbench: Comprehensive benchmark suite for video generative models

    Ziqi Huang, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Fan Zhang, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, Yuanhan Zhang, Tianxing Wu, Qingyang Jin, Nattapol Chanpaisit, et al. Vbench: Comprehensive benchmark suite for video generative models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Patt...

    2024

  46. [54]

    Flux.https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux, 2024

    Black Forest Labs. Flux.https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Artgrid.Artgrid:https://artgrid.io, 2025

    2025

  48. [56]

    Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00714, 2024

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman Rädle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Eric Mintun, Junting Pan, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Nicolas Carion, Chao-Yuan Wu, Ross Girshick, Piotr Dollár, and Christoph Feichtenh...

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    hard” and progressing to “easy

    Qiuheng Wang, Yukai Shi, Jiarong Ou, Rui Chen, Ke Lin, Jiahao Wang, Boyuan Jiang, Haotian Yang, Mingwu Zheng, Xin Tao, et al. Koala-36m: A large-scale video dataset improving con- sistency between fine-grained conditions and video content.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08260, 2024....

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.